Structural and functional characterization of a ubiquitin variant engineered for tight and specific binding to an alpha‐helical ubiquitin interacting motif

Ubiquitin interacting motifs (UIMs) are short α‐helices found in a number of eukaryotic proteins. UIMs interact weakly but specifically with ubiquitin conjugated to other proteins, and in so doing, mediate specific cellular signals. Here we used phage display to generate ubiquitin variants (UbVs) targeting the N‐terminal UIM of the yeast Vps27 protein. Selections yielded UbV.v27.1, which recognized the cognate UIM with high specificity relative to other yeast UIMs and bound with an affinity more than two orders of magnitude higher than that of ubiquitin. Structural and mutational studies of the UbV.v27.1‐UIM complex revealed the molecular details for the enhanced affinity and specificity of UbV.v27.1, and underscored the importance of changes at the binding interface as well as at positions that do not contact the UIM. Our study highlights the power of the phage display approach for selecting UbVs with unprecedented affinity and high selectivity for particular α‐helical UIM domains within proteomes, and it establishes a general approach for the development of inhibitors targeting interactions of this type.     

Crystal structures of Lys‐63‐linked tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin reveal a highly extended chain architecture

The covalent attachment of different types of poly‐ubiquitin chains signal different outcomes for the proteins so targeted. For example, a protein modified with Lys‐48‐linked poly‐ubiquitin chains is targeted for proteasomal degradation, whereas Lys‐63‐linked chains encode nondegradative signals. The structural features that enable these different types of chains to encode different signals have not yet been fully elucidated. We report here the X‐ray crystal structures of Lys‐63‐linked tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin at resolutions of 2.3 and 1.9 Å, respectively. The tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin species adopt essentially identical structures. In both instances, the ubiquitin chain assumes a highly extended conformation with a left‐handed helical twist; the helical chain contains four ubiquitin monomers per turn and has a repeat length of ～110 Å. Interestingly, Lys‐48 ubiquitin chains also adopt a left‐handed helical structure with a similar repeat length. However, the Lys‐63 architecture is much more open than that of Lys‐48 chains and exposes much more of the ubiquitin surface for potential recognition events. These new crystal structures are consistent with the results of solution studies of Lys‐63 chain conformation, and reveal the structural basis for differential recognition of Lys‐63 versus Lys‐48 chains. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Molecular Basis for Phosphorylation-dependent SUMO Recognition by the DNA Repair Protein RAP80

Recognition and repair of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSB) involves the targeted recruitment of BRCA tumor suppressors to damage foci through binding of both ubiquitin (Ub) and the Ub-like modifier SUMO. RAP80 is a component of the BRCA1 A complex, and plays a key role in the recruitment process through the binding of Lys⁶³-linked poly-Ub chains by tandem Ub interacting motifs (UIM). RAP80 also contains a SUMO interacting motif (SIM) just upstream of the tandem UIMs that has been shown to specifically bind the SUMO-2 isoform. The RAP80 tandem UIMs and SIM function collectively for optimal recruitment of BRCA1 to DSBs, although the molecular basis of this process is not well understood. Using NMR spectroscopy, we demonstrate that the RAP80 SIM binds SUMO-2, and that both specificity and affinity are enhanced through phosphorylation of the canonical CK2 site within the SIM. The affinity increase results from an enhancement of electrostatic interactions between the phosphoserines of RAP80 and the SIM recognition module within SUMO-2. The NMR structure of the SUMO-2·phospho-RAP80 complex reveals that the molecular basis for SUMO-2 specificity is due to isoform-specific sequence differences in electrostatic SIM recognition modules.     

VHS domains of ESCRT‐0 cooperate in high‐avidity binding to polyubiquitinated cargo

VHS (Vps27, Hrs, and STAM) domains occur in ESCRT‐0 subunits Hrs and STAM, GGA adapters, and other trafficking proteins. The structure of the STAM VHS domain–ubiquitin complex was solved at 2.6 Å resolution, revealing that determinants for ubiquitin recognition are conserved in nearly all VHS domains. VHS domains from all classes of VHS‐domain containing proteins in yeast and humans, including both subunits of ESCRT‐0, bound ubiquitin in vitro. ESCRTs have been implicated in the sorting of Lys63‐linked polyubiquitinated cargo. Intact human ESCRT‐0 binds Lys63‐linked tetraubiquitin 50‐fold more tightly than monoubiquitin, though only 2‐fold more tightly than Lys48‐linked tetraubiquitin. The gain in affinity is attributed to the cooperation of flexibly connected VHS and UIM motifs of ESCRT‐0 in avid binding to the polyubiquitin chain. Mutational analysis of all the five ubiquitin‐binding sites in yeast ESCRT‐0 shows that cooperation between them is required for the sorting of the Lys63‐linked polyubiquitinated cargo Cps1 to the vacuole.     

Ubiquitin-interacting Motifs Confer Full Catalytic Activity,but Not Ubiquitin Chain Substrate Specificity,to Deubiquitinating Enzyme USP37

Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) consist of a family of deubiquitinating enzymes with more than 50 members in humans. Three of them, including USP37, contain ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs), an ∼20-amino acid α-helical stretch that binds to ubiquitin. However, the roles of the UIMs in these USP enzymes remain unknown. USP37 has three UIMs, designated here as UIMs 1, 2, and 3 from the N-terminal side, between the Cys and His boxes comprising the catalytic core. Here, we examined the role of the UIMs in USP37 using its mutants that harbor mutations in the UIMs. The nuclear localization of USP37 was not affected by the UIM mutations. However, mutations in UIM2 or UIM3, but not UIM1, resulted in a significant decrease in USP37 binding to ubiquitinated proteins in the cell. In vitro, a region of USP37 harboring the three UIMs also bound to both Lys⁴⁸-linked and Lys⁶³-linked ubiquitin chains in a UIM2- and UIM3-dependent manner. The level of USP37 ubiquitination was also reduced by mutations in UIM2 or UIM3, suggesting their role in ubiquitination of USP37 itself. Finally, mutants lacking functional UIM2 or UIM3 exhibited a reduced isopeptidase activity toward ubiquitinated proteins in the cell and both Lys⁴⁸-linked and Lys⁶³-linked ubiquitin chains. These results suggested that the UIMs in USP37 contribute to the full enzymatic activity, but not ubiquitin chain substrate specificity, of USP37 possibly by holding the ubiquitin chain substrate in the proximity of the catalytic core.     

Double-sided ubiquitin binding of Hrs-UIM in endosomal protein sorting

Hrs has an essential role in sorting of monoubiquitinated receptors to multivesicular bodies for lysosomal degradation, through recognition of ubiquitinated receptors by its ubiquitin-interacting motif (UIM). Here, we present the structure of a complex of Hrs-UIM and ubiquitin at 1.7-A resolution. Hrs-UIM forms a single alpha-helix, which binds two ubiquitin molecules, one on either side. These two ubiquitin molecules are related by pseudo two-fold screw symmetry along the helical axis of the UIM, corresponding to a shift by two residues on the UIM helix. Both ubiquitin molecules interact with the UIM in the same manner, using the Ile44 surface, with equal binding affinities. Mutational experiments show that both binding sites of Hrs-UIM are required for efficient degradative protein sorting. Hrs-UIM belongs to a new subclass of double-sided UIMs, in contrast to its yeast homolog Vps27p, which has two tandem single-sided UIMs.     

S5a promotes protein degradation by blocking synthesis of nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains

Ubiquitin (Ub)–protein conjugates formed by purified ring‐finger or U‐box E3s with the E2, UbcH5, resist degradation and disassembly by 26S proteasomes. These chains contain multiple types of Ub forks in which two Ub's are linked to adjacent lysines on the proximal Ub. We tested whether cells contain factors that prevent formation of nondegradable conjugates and whether the forked chains prevent proteasomal degradation. S5a is a ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) protein present in the cytosol and in the 26S proteasome. Addition of S5a or a GST‐fusion of S5a's UIM domains to a ubiquitination reaction containing 26S proteasomes, UbcH5, an E3 (MuRF1 or CHIP), and a protein substrate, dramatically stimulated its degradation, provided S5a was present during ubiquitination. Mass spectrometry showed that S5a and GST–UIM prevented the formation of Ub forks without affecting synthesis of standard isopeptide linkages. The forked Ub chains bind poorly to 26S proteasomes unlike those synthesized with S5a present or linked to Lys63 or Lys48 chains. Thus, S5a (and presumably certain other UIM proteins) function with certain E3/E2 pairs to ensure synthesis of efficiently degraded non‐forked Ub conjugates.     

Structural basis for specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by NZF domains of TAB2 and TAB3

TAB2 and TAB3 activate the Jun N‐terminal kinase and nuclear factor‐κB pathways through the specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by its Npl4 zinc‐finger (NZF) domain. Here we report crystal structures of the TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains in complex with Lys 63‐linked diubiquitin at 1.18 and 1.40 Å resolutions, respectively. Both NZF domains bind to the distal ubiquitin through a conserved Thr‐Phe dipeptide that has been shown to be important for the interaction of the NZF domain of Npl4 with monoubiquitin. In contrast, a surface specific to TAB2 and TAB3 binds the proximal ubiquitin. Both the distal and proximal binding sites of the TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains recognize the Ile 44‐centred hydrophobic patch on ubiquitin but do not interact with the Lys 63‐linked isopeptide bond. Mutagenesis experiments show that both binding sites are required to enable binding of Lys 63‐linked diubiquitin. We therefore propose a mechanism for the recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains in which diubiquitin units are specifically recognized by a single NZF domain.     

Mapping the interactions between Lys48 and Lys63-linked di-ubiquitins and a ubiquitin-interacting motif of S5a

Numerous cellular processes are regulated by (poly)ubiquitin-mediated signaling events, which involve a covalent modification of the substrate protein by a single ubiquitin or a chain of ubiquitin molecules linked via a specific lysine. Remarkably, the outcome of polyubiquitination is linkage-dependent. For example, Lys48-linked chains are the principal signal for proteasomal degradation, while Lys63-linked chains act as nonproteolytic signals. Despite significant progress in characterization of various cellular pathways involving ubiquitin, understanding of the structural details of polyubiquitin chain recognition by downstream cellular effectors is missing. Here we use NMR to study the interaction of a ubiquitin-interacting motif (UIM) of the proteasomal subunit S5a with di-ubiquitin, the simplest model for polyubiquitin chain, to gain insights into the mechanism of polyubiquitin recognition by the proteasome. We have mapped the binding interface and characterized the stoichiometry and the process of UIM binding to Lys48- and Lys63-linked di-ubiquitin chains. Our data provide the first direct evidence that UIM binding involves a conformational transition in Lys48-linked di-ubiquitin, which opens the hydrophobic interdomain interface. This allows UIM to enter the interface and bind directly to the same ubiquitin hydrophobic-patch surface as utilized in UIM:monoubiquitin complexes. The results indicate that up to two UIM molecules can bind di-ubiquitin, and the binding interface between UIM and ubiquitin units in di-ubiquitin is essentially the same for both Lys48- and Lys63-linked chains. Our data suggest possible structural models for the binding of UIM and of full-length S5a to di-ubiquitin.     

Lysine 63‐linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome

Recruitment of substrates to the 26S proteasome usually requires covalent attachment of the Lys48‐linked polyubiquitin chain. In contrast, modifications with the Lys63‐linked polyubiquitin chain and/or monomeric ubiquitin are generally thought to function in proteasome‐independent cellular processes. Nevertheless, the ubiquitin chain‐type specificity for the proteasomal targeting is still poorly understood, especially in vivo. Using mass spectrometry, we found that Rsp5, a ubiquitin‐ligase in budding yeast, catalyzes the formation of Lys63‐linked ubiquitin chains in vitro. Interestingly, the 26S proteasome degraded well the Lys63‐linked ubiquitinated substrate in vitro. To examine whether Lys63‐linked ubiquitination serves in degradation in vivo, we investigated the ubiquitination of Mga2‐p120, a substrate of Rsp5. The polyubiquitinated p120 contained relatively high levels of Lys63‐linkages, and the Lys63‐linked chains were sufficient for the proteasome‐binding and subsequent p120‐processing. In addition, Lys63‐linked chains as well as Lys48‐linked chains were detected in the 26S proteasome‐bound polyubiquitinated proteins. These results raise the possibility that Lys63‐linked ubiquitin chain also serves as a targeting signal for the 26S proteaseome in vivo.     

A ubiquitin-interacting motif from Hrs binds to and occludes the ubiquitin surface necessary for polyubiquitination in monoubiquitinated proteins

The ubiquitin-interacting motif (UIM) is a short, approximately 20 residue, structural element, which is present in, but not limited to, the proteins involved in endocytotic and proteasomal degradation. UIMs facilitate endocytotic vesicular sorting of the monoubiquitinated proteins and may be important for the targeting of the polyubiquitinated proteins to the proteasome. Using heteronuclear NMR backbone and side-chain chemical shift mapping of the ubiquitin interaction surface, the UIM from the hepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substrate, Hrs, specifically binds to the ubiquitin hydrophobic surface using UIM's well-conserved central helical LALAL motif. Molecular modeling of the ubiquitin:UIM_Hrs complex suggests that binding occurs through a specific interaction of Leu263 and Leu267 of the UIM_Hrs with two ubiquitin hydrophobic patches located in close proximity to the ubiquitin major polyubiquitination site, Lys48. Intramolecular binding of ubiquitin to a UIM in monoubiquitinated proteins would render Lys48 unavailable for further ubiquitination, thus, explaining the absolute requirement of UIMs for monoubiquitination. Two leucines, Leu265 and Leu269, located on the opposite face of UIM_Hrs can also interact, albeit less favorably than Leu263 and Leu267, with the ubiquitin hydrophobic patches, suggesting a possible mode for polyubiquitin:UIM binding and apparent preference of UIMs for polyubiquitins.     

NMR analysis of Lys63-linked polyubiquitin recognition by the tandem ubiquitin-interacting motifs of Rap80

Ubiquitin is a post-translational modifier that is involved in cellular functions through its covalent attachment to target proteins. Ubiquitin can also be conjugated to itself at seven lysine residues and at its amino terminus to form eight linkage-specific polyubiquitin chains for individual cellular processes. The Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chain is recognized by tandem ubiquitin-interacting motifs (tUIMs) of Rap80 for the regulation of DNA repair. To understand the recognition mechanism between the Lys63-linked diubiquitin (K63-Ub₂) and the tUIMs in solution, we determined the solution structure of the K63-Ub₂:tUIMs complex by using NOE restraints and RDC data derived from NMR spectroscopy. The structure showed that the tUIMs adopts a nearly straight and single continuous α-helix, and the two ubiquitin units of the K63-Ub₂ separately bind to each UIM motif. The interfaces are formed between Ile44-centered patches of the two ubiquitin units and the hydrophobic residues of the tUIMs. We also showed that the linker region between the two UIM motifs possesses a random-coil conformation in the free state, but undergoes the coil-to-helix transition upon complex formation, which simultaneously fixes the relative position of ubiquitin subunits. These data suggest that the relative position of ubiquitin subunits in the K63-Ub₂:tUIMs complex is essential for linkage-specific binding of Rap80 tUIMs.     

Epsin 1 is a polyubiquitin-selective clathrin-associated sorting protein

Epsin 1 engages several core components of the endocytic clathrin coat, yet the precise mode of operation of the protein remains controversial. The occurrence of tandem ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs) suggests that epsin could recognize a ubiquitin internalization tag, but the association of epsin with clathrin-coat components or monoubiquitin is reported to be mutually exclusive. Here, we show that endogenous epsin 1 is clearly an integral component of clathrin coats forming at the cell surface and is essentially absent from caveolin-1-containing structures under normal conditions. The UIM region of epsin 1 associates directly with polyubiquitin chains but has extremely poor affinity for monoubiquitin. Polyubiquitin binding is retained when epsin synchronously associates with phosphoinositides, the AP-2 adaptor complex and clathrin. The enrichment of epsin within clathrin-coated vesicles purified from different tissue sources varies and correlates with sorting of multiubiquitinated cargo, and in cultured cells, polyubiquitin, rather than non-conjugable monoubiquitin, promotes rapid internalization. As epsin interacts with eps15, which also contains a UIM region that binds to polyubiquitin, epsin and eps15 appear to be central components of the vertebrate poly/multiubiquitin-sorting endocytic clathrin machinery.     

Structural and functional studies of USP20 ZnF‐UBP domain by NMR

Deubiquitinase USP20/VDU2 has been demonstrated to play important roles in multiple cellular processes by controlling the life span of substrate proteins including hypoxia‐inducible factor HIF1α, and so forth. USP20 contains four distinct structural domains including the N‐terminal zinc‐finger ubiquitin binding domain (ZnF‐UBP), the catalytic domain (USP domain), and two tandem DUSP domains, and none of the structures for these four domains has been solved. Meanwhile, except for the ZnF‐UBP domain, the biological functions for USP20's catalytic domain and tandem DUSP domains have been at least partially clarified. Here in this study, we determined the solution structure of USP20 ZnF‐UBP domain and investigated its binding properties with mono‐ubiquitin and poly‐ubiquitin (K48‐linked di‐ubiquitin) by using NMR and molecular modeling techniques. USP20's ZnF‐UBP domain forms a spherically shaped fold consisting of a central β‐sheet with either one α‐helix or two α‐helices packed on each side of the sheet. However, although having formed a canonical core structure essential for ubiquitin recognition, USP20 ZnF‐UBP presents weak ubiquitin binding capacity. The structural basis for understanding USP20 ZnF‐UBP's ubiquitin binding capacity was revealed by NMR data‐driven docking. Although the electrostatic interactions between D264 of USP5 (E87 in USP20 ZnF‐UBP) and R74 of ubiquitin are kept, the loss of the extensive interactions formed between ubiquitin's di‐glycine motif and the conserved and non‐conserved residues of USP20 ZnF‐UBP domain (W41, E55, and Y84) causes a significant decrease in its binding affinity to ubiquitin. Our findings indicate that USP20 ZnF‐UBP domain might have a physiological role unrelated to its ubiquitin binding capacity.     

Molecular discrimination of structurally equivalent Lys 63‐linked and linear polyubiquitin chains

At least eight types of ubiquitin chain exist, and individual linkages affect distinct cellular processes. The only distinguishing feature of differently linked ubiquitin chains is their structure, as polymers of the same unit are chemically identical. Here, we have crystallized Lys 63‐linked and linear ubiquitin dimers, revealing that both adopt equivalent open conformations, forming no contacts between ubiquitin molecules and thereby differing significantly from Lys 48‐linked ubiquitin chains. We also examined the specificity of various deubiquitinases (DUBs) and ubiquitin‐binding domains (UBDs). All analysed DUBs, except CYLD, cleave linear chains less efficiently compared with other chain types, or not at all. Likewise, UBDs can show chain specificity, and are able to select distinct linkages from a ubiquitin chain mixture. We found that the UBAN (ubiquitin binding in ABIN and NEMO) motif of NEMO (NF‐κB essential modifier) binds to linear chains exclusively, whereas the NZF (Npl4 zinc finger) domain of TAB2 (TAK1 binding protein 2) is Lys 63 specific. Our results highlight remarkable specificity determinants within the ubiquitin system.     

Dimerization of a ubiquitin variant leads to high affinity interactions with a ubiquitin interacting motif

We previously described structural and functional characterization of the first ubiquitin variant (UbV), UbV.v27.1, engineered by phage display to bind with high affinity to a specific ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM). We identified two substitutions relative to ubiquitin (Gly10Val/His68Tyr) that were critical for enhancing binding affinity but could only rationalize the mechanism of action of the Tyr68 substitution. Here, we extend our characterization and uncover the mechanism by which the Val10 substitution enhances binding affinity. We show that Val10 in UbV.v27.1 drives UbV dimerization through an intermolecular β‐strand exchange. Dimerization serves to increase the contact surface between the UIM and UbV and also affords direct contacts between two UIMs through an overall 2:2 binding stoichiometry. Our identification of the role of Val10 in UbV dimerization suggests a general means for the development of dimeric UbVs with improved affinity and specificity relative to their monomeric UbV counterparts. Statement: Previously, we used phage display to engineer a UbV that bound tightly and specifically to a UIM. Here, we discovered that tight binding is partly due to the dimerization of the UbV, which increases the contact surface between the UbV and UIM. We show that UbV dimerization is dependent on the Gly10Val substitution, and posit that dimerization may provide a general means for engineering UbVs with improved binding properties.     

Conformational Dynamics and Structural Plasticity Play Critical Roles in the Ubiquitin Recognition of a UIM Domain

Ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs) are an important class of protein domains that interact with ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like proteins. These approximately 20-residue-long domains are found in a variety of ubiquitin receptor proteins and serve as recognition modules towards intracellular targets, which may be individual ubiquitin subunits or polyubiquitin chains attached to a variety of proteins. Previous structural studies of interactions between UIMs and ubiquitin have shown that UIMs adopt an extended structure of a single α-helix, containing a hydrophobic surface with a conserved sequence pattern that interacts with key hydrophobic residues on ubiquitin. In light of this large body of structural studies, details regarding the presence and the roles of structural dynamics and plasticity are surprisingly lacking. In order to better understand the structural basis of ubiquitin-UIM recognition, we have characterized changes in the structure and dynamics of ubiquitin upon binding of a UIM domain from the yeast Vps27 protein. The solution structure of a ubiquitin-UIM fusion protein designed to study these interactions is reported here and found to consist of a well-defined ubiquitin core and a bipartite UIM helix. Moreover, we have studied the plasticity of the docking interface, as well as global changes in ubiquitin due to UIM binding at the picoseconds-to-nanoseconds and microseconds-to-milliseconds protein motions by nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation. Changes in generalized-order parameters of amide groups show a distinct trend towards increased structural rigidity at the UIM-ubiquitin interface relative to values determined in unbound ubiquitin. Analysis of ¹⁵N Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill relaxation dispersion measurements suggests the presence of two types of motions: one directly related to the UIM-binding interface and the other induced to distal parts of the protein. This study demonstrates a case where localized interactions among protein domains have global effects on protein motions at timescales ranging from picoseconds to milliseconds.     

A single MIU motif of MINDY‐1 recognizes K48‐linked polyubiquitin chains

The eight different types of ubiquitin (Ub) chains that can be formed play important roles in diverse cellular processes. Linkage‐selective recognition of Ub chains by Ub‐binding domain (UBD)‐containing proteins is central to coupling different Ub signals to specific cellular responses. The motif interacting with ubiquitin (MIU) is a small UBD that has been characterized for its binding to monoUb. The recently discovered deubiquitinase MINDY‐1/FAM63A contains a tandem MIU repeat (tMIU) that is highly selective at binding to K48‐linked polyUb. We here identify that this linkage‐selective binding is mediated by a single MIU motif (MIU2) in MINDY‐1. The crystal structure of MIU2 in complex with K48‐linked polyubiquitin chains reveals that MIU2 on its own binds to all three Ub moieties in an open conformation that can only be accommodated by K48‐linked triUb. The weak Ub binder MIU1 increases overall affinity of the tMIU for polyUb chains without affecting its linkage selectivity. Our analyses reveal new concepts for linkage selectivity and polyUb recognition by UBDs.     

The Brichos domain of prosurfactant protein C can hold and fold a transmembrane segment

Prosurfactant protein C (proSP‐C) is a 197‐residue integral membrane protein, in which the C‐terminal domain (CTC, positions 59–197) is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen and contains a Brichos domain (positions 94–197). Mature SP‐C corresponds largely to the transmembrane (TM) region of proSP‐C. CTC binds to SP‐C, provided that it is in nonhelical conformation, and can prevent formation of intracellular amyloid‐like inclusions of proSP‐C that harbor mutations linked to interstitial lung disease (ILD). Herein it is shown that expression of proSP‐C (1–58), that is, the N‐terminal propeptide and the TM region, in HEK293 cells results in virtually no detectable protein, while coexpression of CTC in trans yields SDS‐soluble monomeric proSP‐C (1–58). Recombinant human (rh) CTC binds to cellulose‐bound peptides derived from the nonpolar TM region, but not the polar cytosolic part, of proSP‐C, and requires ≥5‐residues for maximal binding. Binding of rhCTC to a nonhelical peptide derived from SP‐C results in α‐helix formation provided that it contains a long TM segment. Finally, rhCTC and rhCTC Brichos domain shows very similar substrate specificities, but rhCTC^L188Q, a mutation linked to ILD is unable to bind all peptides analyzed. These data indicate that the Brichos domain of proSP‐C is a chaperone that induces α‐helix formation of an aggregation‐prone TM region.