On the larval development of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Eubranchipus grubii</Emphasis> (Crustacea,Branchiopoda, Anostraca), with notes on the basal phylogeny of the Branchiopoda

Selected larval stages of Eubranchipus grubii (Anostraca) from Danish temporary waters are examined by scanning electron microscopy in a phylogenetic context. The study focuses on limb development and body segmentation. It is shown that the large, proximal endite of the trunk limbs in the adult Anostraca is actually a fusion product of two smaller endites which make their appearance in the early larval development. This gives a total of six endites along the inner margin of the trunk limbs. An unsegmented endopod follows more distally. A small additional, seventh endite makes a short appearance in late larvae, but has disappeared in the adults. The naupliar feeding apparatus is of the same type as found in other branchiopods, and has previously been suggested as an autapomorphy for the Branchiopoda. The similarities between the naupliar feeding apparatus of E. grubii and other branchiopods include the presence of a long protopod with a characteristic morphology of the coxal and basipodal masticatory spines/setae, and a three-segmented mandibular palp (basipod and two endopod segments) with a largely similar setation in all taxa. The mode of trunk limb development is also the same as seen in most other recent branchiopods. The phylogenetic significance for the basal phylogeny of the Branchiopoda of these and other morphological features is discussed in relation to the phylogenetic position of two branchiopod fossils, Lepidocaris rhyniensis and Rehbachiella kinnekullensis. While R. kinnekullensis has previously been suggested to be a stem lineage branchiopod, the position of L. rhyniensis is more uncertain. Three different possible phylogenetic positions of L. rhyniensis are discussed: (a) L. rhyniensis as a stem lineage anostracan, (b) L. rhyniensis as a stem lineage branchiopod or (c) L. rhyniensis as a stem lineage phyllopod. It seems most plausible to consider L. rhyniensis a stem lineage anostracan.     

The evolutionary transformation of phyllopodous to stenopodous limbs in the Branchiopoda (Crustacea)--is there a common mechanism for early limb development in arthropods?

Arthropods and in particular crustaceans show a great diversity concerning their limb morphology. This makes the homologization of limbs and their parts and our understanding of evolutionary transformations of these limb types problematical. To address these problems we undertook a comparative study of the limb development of two representatives of branchiopod crustaceans, one with phyllopodous the other with stenopodous trunk limbs. The trunk limb ontogeny of a 'larger branchiopod', Cyclestheria hislopi ('Conchostraca') and the raptorial cladoceran Leptodora kindtii (Haplopoda) has been examined by various methods such as SEM, Hoechst fluorescent stain and expression of the Distal-less gene. The early ontogeny of the trunk limbs in C. hislopi and L. kindtii is similar. In both species the limbs are formed as ventrally placed, elongate, subdivided limb buds. However, in C. hislopi, the portions of the early limb bud end up constituting the endites and the endopod of the phyllopodous filtratory limb in the adult, whereas in L. kindtii, similar limb bud portions end up constituting the actual segments in the segmented, stenopodous, and raptorial trunk limbs of the adults. Hence, the portions of the limbs corresponding to the endites of the phyllopodous trunk limbs in C. hislopi (and other 'larger branchiopods') are homologous to the segments of the stenopodous trunk limbs in L. kindtii. It is most parsimonious to assume that the segmented trunk limbs in L. kindtii have developed from phyllopodous limbs with endites and not vice versa. This study has demonstrated at least one way in which segmented limbs have been derived from phyllopodous, multi-lobate limbs during evolution. Similar pathways can be assumed for the evolution of stenopodous, segmented and uniramous limbs in other crustaceans. Irrespective of the differences in the adult limb morphology, the early patterning of arthropod limbs seems to follow a similar principle.     

Larval development of Japanese 'conchostracans': part 1, larval development of Eulimnadia braueriana (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata, Limnadiidae) compared to that of other limnadiids

As a part of a project to compare phylogenetically the larval or embryonic development of all major taxa of the Branchiopoda (Crustacea), the larval development of the Japanese spinicaudatan clam shrimp Eulimnadia braueriana Ishikawa, 1895, is described. Seven naupliar stages are recognized, based mainly on significant morphological differences between them, but in one case, on size alone. The seven stages range in length from 156 µm to 760 µm. Nauplius 1 is nonfeeding with incompletely developed and nonfunctional feeding structures. Nauplius 2 has apparently functional feeding structures, including a well-developed mandibular gnathobase, setulate protopodal endites of the antennae, and setules on various setae involved in swimming and food manipulation. Nauplius 3 is morphologically identical to Nauplius 2, but more than 50% larger. In nauplius 4, the coxal endite (naupliar process) of the antennae develops a bifid tip. Nauplius 5 has a lateral pair of primordial carapace lobes, and the first 4–5 pairs of trunk limb buds are weakly developed, making the anterior part of the trunk wider than the posterior. In nauplius 6, five pairs of trunk limb buds are visible externally and a small carapace has appeared, reaching approximately to trunk limbs 2; also, the pair of large buds behind the mandibles in previous stages has become divided into a large, anterior, setose bud and two smaller, posterior buds. The identities of these structures as either paragnaths or maxillules/maxillae remain uncertain. In nauplius 7, about six pairs of trunk limb buds are visible externally. The general morphology of the nauplius larvae of E. braueriana is much like those of the well-known Limnadia lenticularis (Linnaeus, 1758) and Eulimnadia texana Packard, 1871, including an elongate, lanceolate labrum; however, because of various heterochronies, the correspondence between the larval sequences of these species is not perfect. There is even less correspondence with the 5-stage larval development reported for Limnadia stanleyana King, 1855, and the spatulate labra of that species and Jmnadia spp. are different from those of other known limnadiid nauplii. The larvae of E. braueriana possess many typical (and synapomorphic) branchiopod features, such as the general morphology of the appendages involved in feeding and the mode of trunk limb development, while the small buds of the first antennae and the exact number and development of the parts of the trunk limbs are typical for the Spinicaudata.     

Comparative morphology among trunk limbs of Caenestheriella gifuensis and Leptestheria kawachiensis (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Spinicaudata)

Morphological differences among groups of the 24 trunk limbs of Caenestheriella gifuensis (Ishikawa, 1895) and differences between males and females are described and illustrated. A setose attenuate lobe located proximally near enditic lobe 1 and a discoid lobe covered with small setae proximal to enditic lobe 1 are newly described. The five ventral enditic lobes, endopod, exopod, and dorsal exite of traditional spinicaudatan morphology are redescribed. Trunk limbs 1–4 of females bear a palp on enditic lobe 5 and trunk limbs 1–15 of males bear a similar palp. A second, articulating palp is associated with the base of the endopod of trunk limbs 1–2 of males. The proximal part of trunk limbs 19–24, bearing enditic lobe 1, articulates by an arthrodial membrane with the remainder of the limb, and the exite is distal to this arthrodial membrane. Development of trunk limbs, ascertained through an examination of early juvenile instars of Leptestheria kawachiensis Uéno, 1927, includes an asetose limb followed in time by a series of setose limbs that increase in morphological complexity with age. The number of lobes on the asetose limb varies from seven (corresponding to five enditic lobes, an endopod, and an exopod) on anterior limbs to five on trunk limb 24, which lacks the lobes corresponding to enditic lobe 4 and the endopod; these two structures are added later to setose limbs. The attenuate lobe, the discoid lobe, the exite of all trunk limbs, and the palps of the anterior trunk limbs are added to the setose limbs. Development of anterior limbs is accelerated relative to that of posterior limbs, and development of the more posterior limbs is truncated relative to that of limbs immediately anterior to them. Enditic lobe 4 and the endopod of limbs like trunk limb 24 develop from, or are patterned by, enditic lobe 5; the articulating palp of male trunk limbs 1–2 also may be added in this way. A comparison of these observations with development of the copepod maxilliped suggests that the spinicaudatan trunk limb is composed of a praecoxa with three lobes, a coxa and a basis each with one lobe, and an endopod of three segments in females and four in males. This is similar to the homology scheme previously proposed by Hansen in 1925. A critique is given of attempts to homologize parts of arthropod limbs based on developmental gene expression patterns. Stenopodal to phyllopodal transformations of maxillipeds in copepods provide a model at least partly applicable to spinicaudatans, and a ‘multibranched’ interpretation of spinicaudatan (and by extension branchiopodan) limb morphology is rejected. There is nothing intrinsic to the structure of the adult trunk limbs suggesting that they are similar to the adult limbs of the ancestral branchiopod or the ancestral crustacean, but early developmental steps of more posterior limbs are good matches for the morphology of an ancestral crustacean biramal limb predicted by a hypothesis of duplication of the proximo‐distal axis. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 139 , 547–564. No claim to original US government works.     

Transitions in functional morphology from “large branchiopods” to Cladocera: Video and confocal microscopic studies of Cyclestheria hislopi (Cyclestherida) and Sida crystallina (Cladocera: Ctenopoda)

Great diversity is found in morphology and functionality of arthropod appendages, both along the body axis of individual animals and between different life-cycle stages. Despite many branchiopod crustaceans being well known for displaying a relatively simple arrangement of many serially post-maxillary appendages (trunk limbs), this taxon also shows an often unappreciated large variation in appendage morphology. Diplostracan branchiopods exhibit generally a division of labor into locomotory antennae and feeding/filtratory post-maxillary appendages (trunk limbs). We here study the functionality and morphology of the swimming antennae and feeding appendages in clam shrimps and cladocerans and analyze the findings in an evolutionary context (e.g., possible progenetic origin of Cladocera). We focus on Cyclestheria hislopi (Cyclestherida), sister species to Cladocera and exhibiting many “large” branchiopod characters (e.g., many serially similar appendages), and Sida crystallina (Cladocera, Ctenopoda), which likely exhibits plesiomorphic cladoceran traits (e.g., six pairs of serially similar appendages). We combine (semi-)high-speed recordings of behavior with confocal laser scanning microscopy analyses of musculature to infer functionality and homologies of locomotory and filtratory appendages in the two groups. Our morphological study shows that the musculature in all trunk limbs (irrespective of limb size) of both C. hislopi and S. crystallina comprises overall similar muscle groups in largely corresponding arrangements. Some differences between C. hislopi and S. crystallina, such as fewer trunk limbs and antennal segments in the latter, may reflect a progenetic origin of Cladocera. Other differences seem related to the appearance of a specialized type of swimming and feeding in Cladocera, where the anterior locomotory system (antennae) and the posterior feeding system (trunk limbs) have become fully separated functionally from each other. This separation is likely one explanation for the omnipresence of cladocerans, which have conquered both freshwater and marine free water masses and a number of other habitats.     

A eucrustacean from the Cambrian ‘Orsten’ of Sweden with epipods and a maxillary excretory opening

The Cambrian species Paulinecaris siveterae n. gen. n. sp., known from two trunk fragments, represents the first record of epipods (serving as gills and osmoregulatory structures) in a crustacean from the Swedish ‘Orsten’. Moreover, it is the first report of the maxillary excretory opening of a crustacean based on Cambrian material of ‘Orsten’‐type preservation. One specimen comprises the maxillary segment with an appendage and several thoracic segments with parts of their limbs; a second specimen is a fragment possibly of a more posterior part of the trunk. As in other known small eucrustaceans, the tergites of the new species lack prominent tergopleurae, so that the limbs insert directly ventral to the tergal margins. Limb preservation includes the maxilla and several thoracopods, all possessing a prominent, fleshy basipod with six setose endites along their median rim distally to the proximal endite. The presence of long and prominent limbs of P. siveterae suggests that it had good swimming ability, while the slight C‐like curvature of their basal limb part, basipod, indicates involvement of the limbs also in so‐called ‘sucking chambers’ for suspension feeding coupled with locomotion. The estimated total length of P. siveterae, 2–3 mm, is comparable to that of extant cephalocarids, but its appendages are twice as long and wide. The limbs of P. siveterae also differ in size and armature from extant eucrustaceans as well as early representatives of this group known from the ‘Orsten’ assemblages. The general morphology of the limbs, for example in having a fleshy and C‐shaped basipod with several setae‐bearing endites medially, identifies P. siveterae as an entomostracan eucrustacean, but a lack of further details precludes its affinity with any of the in‐group taxa. Three epipods on the outer edge of the basipod, as in P. siveterae, are also known from the Cambrian eucrustacean Yicaris dianensis from China and early ontogenetic stages of extant fairy shrimps (Anostraca); their adult stages have two epipods. This hints at an original number of three epipods in the ground pattern of Entomostraca, but some uncertainty remains with regard to the eucrustacean ground pattern because Malacostraca possess a maximum number of two.     

Larval development of Lynceus brachyurus (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Laevicaudata): redescription of unusual crustacean nauplii, with special attention to the molt between last nauplius and first juvenile

The larval development of "conchostracans" has received only scattered attention. Here I present the results of a study on the larval (naupliar) development and the metamorphosis of Lynceus brachyurus, a member of the bivalved branchiopod order the Laevicaudata. Lynceus brachyurus is the only species of the "Conchostraca" in Denmark. The phylogenetic position of the Laevicaudata has traditionally been a source of controversy, and this study does not solve the question completely. This work focuses on features potentially important for phylogeny. The general appearance of the larvae of L. brachyurus has been known for more than a century and a half, and some of its unique features include a large, larval dorsal shield; a huge, plate-like labrum; and a pair of immovable, horn-like antennules. However, many details relating to limb morphology, potentially important for phylogeny, have not been studied previously. Based on size categories, five or six larval stages can be recognized. The larvae approximately double their length and width during development (length: 230-520 microm). Most morphological features stay largely unchanged during development, but the antennal coxal masticatory spines are significant exceptions: they become bifid after one of the first molts. In all larval stages only the antennae and the mandibles actively move. In late naupliar stages the trunk limbs become visible as rows of laterally placed, undeveloped, and still immovable lobes. Swimming is performed by the antennae, whereas the mandibles appear to be involved mainly in feeding, as in other branchiopod larvae. The last naupliar stage undergoes a small metamorphosis to the first juvenile stage, the details of which in part were studied by following the premolt juvenile condition through the cuticle of the last stage nauplius. Among other changes there is a characteristic change in the shape and morphology of the univalved dorsal naupliar shield to a bivalved juvenile carapace. The general morphologies of the antennae and the mandibles are very similar to those of other branchiopod larvae and fall well within the "branchiopod naupliar feeding apparatus" recognized as a branchiopod synapomorphy by Olesen (2003), but some specific features shared with the larvae of other "conchostracans" are also identified. These special "conchostracan" features include: 1) a similar antennular setation; 2) a similar comb-like setulation of the bifid antennal coxal processes; and 3) mandibular palpsetae with setules condensed. In light of recent suggestions concerning branchiopod phylogeny (Cyclestheria as a sister group to the Cladocera), these similarities probably do not support a monophyletic "Conchostraca" but rather are symplesiomorphies of this taxon. A final decision must await a phylogenetic analysis of a more complete set of characters.     

Mating Behaviour in Laevicaudatan Clam Shrimp (Crustacea,Branchiopoda) and Functional Morphology of Male Claspers in a Phylogenetic Context: A Video-Based Analysis

Clam shrimps are freshwater branchiopod crustaceans which often present complicated breeding systems including asexual reproduction (parthenogenesis) and mixed mating systems (in androdioecious species both selfing and outcrossing occurs due to the co-presence of hermaphrodites and males). Reproductive patterns of Spinicaudata, which contains most clam shrimp species, have received much attention. Another group of clam shrimps, Laevicaudata, which holds a key position in branchiopod phylogeny, has practically not been studied. As a part of the mating process, males clasp to the carapace margin of the females with a pair (or two pairs) of anterior trunk limbs modified as claspers. Previous studies have shown that clasper morphology is important in a phylogenetic context, and that some parts of the claspers in Spinicaudata and Laevicaudata may have undergone a remarkable parallel evolution. Here we have used video microscopy to study aspects of the mating behaviour, egg extrusion, and fertilization in Lynceus brachyurus (Laevicaudata). It is shown that fertilization is likely to be external and that the peculiar tri-lobed lateral lamellae of female''s hind body assist in guiding the egg mass to the exopodal egg carriers where they are collected by their distal setation. The functional morphology of the male claspers was studied in detail by close-up video recordings. The movable “finger” of the clasper bends around the female''s carapace edge and serves to hold the female during mating. The larger palp grasps around the female carapace margin in a way very similar to the movable “finger”, possibly indirectly providing sensory input on the “finger” position. A brief comparative study of the claspers of a spinicaudatan clam shrimp showed both similarities and differences to the laevicaudatan claspers. The presence of two pairs of claspers in Spinicaudata seems to give males a better hold of the female which may play a role during extended mate guarding.     

Alonella and Dunhevedia (Chydoridae,Cladocera): Morphology of trunk limbs

Summary The legs of some species of genera Alonella and Dunhevedia are described, including the type species of these genera. The structure of the endites and gnathobases is depicted and described in detail. The structure of legs of the studied species is compared with that of species of some other genera, including Eurycercus and Saycia.     

Phylogeny of Branchiopoda (Crustacea) based on a combined analysis of morphological data and six molecular loci

The phylogenetic relationships of branchiopod crustaceans have been in the focus of a number of recent morphological and molecular systematic studies. Although agreeing in some respects, major differences remain. We analyzed molecular sequences and morphological characters for 43 branchiopods and two outgroups. The branchiopod terminals comprise all eight “orders”. The molecular data include six loci: two nuclear ribosomal genes (18S rRNA, 28S rRNA), two mitochondrial ribosomal genes (12S rRNA, 16S rRNA), one nuclear protein coding gene (elongation factor 1α), and one mitochondrial protein coding gene (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I). A total of 65 morphological characters were analyzed dealing with different aspects of branchiopod morphology, including internal anatomy and larval characters. The morphological analysis resulted in a monophyletic Phyllopoda, with Notostraca as the sister group to the remaining taxa supporting the Diplostraca concept (“Conchostraca” + Cladocera). “Conchostraca” is not supported but Cyclestheria hislopi is the sister group to Cladocera (constituting together Cladoceromorpha) and Spinicaudata is closer to Cladoceromorpha than to Laevicaudata. Cladocera is supported as monophyletic. The combined analysis under equal weighting gave results in some respects similar to the morphological analysis. Within Phyllopoda, Cladocera, Cladoceromorpha and Spinicaudata + Cladoceromorpha are monophyletic. The combined analysis is different from the morphological analysis with respect to the position of Notostraca and Laevicaudata. Here, Laevicaudata is the sister group to the remaining Phyllopoda and Notostraca is sister group to Spinicaudata and Cladoceromorpha. A sensitivity analysis using 20 different parameter sets (different insertion–deletion [indel]/substitution and transversion/transition ratios) show the monophyly of Anostraca, Notostraca, Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, Cladoceromorpha, Cladocera, and within Cladocera, of Onychopoda and Gymnomera under all or almost all (i.e., 19 of 20) parameter sets. Analyses with an indel‐to‐transversion ratio up to 2 result in monophyletic Phyllopoda, with Laevicaudata as sister group to the remaining Phyllopoda and with Spinicaudata and Cladoceromorpha as sister groups. Almost all analyses (including those with higher indel weights) result in the same topology when only ingroup taxa are considered. © The Willi Hennig Society 2007.     

The development of the nervous system in Laevicaudata (Crustacea, Branchiopoda): insights into the evolution and homologies of branchiopod limbs and ‘frontal organs’

We investigated the development of the external morphology and of the nervous system in Lynceus biformis and Lynceus brachyurus (Laevicaudata, Branchiopoda), by using immunohistochemical methods in combination with a confocal laser scanning analysis. In both Lynceus species, a free-swimming nauplius larva, equipped with three appendages, hatches from resting eggs. Despite their close phylogenetic relationship to each other, considerable differences are present in their external morphology. Hatching L. brachyurus larvae are equipped with a large and flattened labrum, where in contrast, the L. biformis larvae possess a smaller labrum with four conspicuous posteriorly directed spines at its margin. Despite these differences, the development of the nervous system is quite similar in both species. The hatching larvae are equipped with a naupliar nervous system, and only in the more advanced stages, the development of the ventral nerve cord starts. Furthermore, our investigation into the nervous system provided insights into architecture and evolution of protocerebral sensory organs, the dorsal setae field and the dorsal frontal organ, only present in Laevicaudata. The identification of frontal filaments with an associated frontal filament organ in Lynceus revealed—after a comprehensive comparison with other branchiopods—that these organs exist throughout Branchiopoda and are comparable to those in other crustaceans. Additionally, our results of the peripheral nervous system analysis showed that the innervation pattern of the naupliar appendages (antenna and mandible) and the trunk appendages could be serially homologized, despite much difference in gross morphology of these. Based on the innervation pattern of limbs, we suggest that the larval uniramous mandibular palp, found in the larvae of all ‘large’ branchiopods, is largely exopodal of nature (contrary to most earlier statements) and that the endopodite of the trunk limbs consists of only one distal endite-like segment (confirming some earlier statements) and not of three as proposed by others.     

The larval development of an Australian limnadiid clam shrimp (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata), and a comparison with other Limnadiidae

The adult morphology of the Australian Limnadopsis shows some remarkable differences to that of other Limnadiidae. These differences are not reflected in its larval development. In Limnadopsis parvispinus, larval development comprises six stages. In stages I and II only the three naupliar appendages are present: the antennule as a small bud, the biramous antenna as the main swimming organ, and the mandible. The antennal protopod bears two endites, the proximal naupliar process and a more distal endite. In stage III a bifid naupliar process (in earlier stages not bifid) and the first signs of the carapace and trunk limb anlagen (undifferentiated rudiments) appear. In stage IV the carapace anlagen become more pronounced. The number of trunk limb anlagens increases to five, and differentiation has commenced. In stage V the first five pairs of trunk limbs are differentiated to varying degrees. The anterior-most four pairs of trunk limbs are subdivided into five endites, a small endopod, an exopod and an epipod. The bivalved carapace covers the anterior-most limbs. In larval stage VI the carapace is larger and the trunk limbs are further differentiated. A general pattern in the sequence of larval stages is the increasing number of sensilla on the antennules. From the last larval to the first postlarval stage, a significant change in morphology takes place. The trunk limbs are now used for swimming. Typical larval organs are much smaller than in the last larval stage. A comparison with other representatives of the Limnadiidae shows a high degree of correspondence, with most differences explained by the heterochronous appearance of characters during development. Five to seven stages are described for all studied Limnadiidae, including one particular stage in which four fully developed setae, a bifid naupliar process and the first signs of carapace anlagen are present. These characters are found in stage III in L. parvispinus, Limnadia stanleyana, Eulimnadia texana, and Imnadia yeyetta but in stage IV in E. braueriana and L. lenticularis. Based on a comparison of the larval stages of six limnadiid and one cyzicid species, we conclude that at least six naupliar stages belong to the limnadiid ground pattern.     

Alona brandorffi sp. n. (Crustacea: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) – a new species from Brazil, related to A. verrucosa Sars, 1901

Alona brandorffi sp. n, related to A. verrucosa Sars, 1901 is described from Boa Vista, Brazil. Parthenogenetic females and males of A. brandorffi were studied. Examination of trunk limbs of A. brandorffi reveals several unusual modifications in structure, unique for the genus, such as very short setae on endites 2 and 3 of limb I, peculiar IDL setae, limb II with scrapers 7–8 with reduced distal part and only six, instead of seven setae in the filter plate, limb IV with only three, instead of four, setae on the inner lobe. The relationships and place of A. brandorffi within the genus Alona are discussed.     

Finding the neck–trunk boundary in snakes: Anteroposterior dissociation of myological characteristics in snakes and its implications for their neck and trunk body regionalization

The neck and trunk regionalization of the presacral musculoskeletal system in snakes and other limb‐reduced squamates was assessed based on observations on craniovertebral and body wall muscles. It was confirmed that myological features characterizing the neck in quadrupedal squamates (i.e., squamates with well‐developed limbs) are retained in all examined snakes, contradicting the complete lack of the neck in snakes hypothesized in previous studies. However, the posterior‐most origins of the craniovertebral muscles and the anterior‐most bony attachments of the body wall muscles that are located at around the neck–trunk boundary in quadrupedal squamates were found to be dissociated anteroposteriorly in snakes. Together with results of a recent study that the anterior expression boundaries of Hox genes coinciding with the neck–trunk boundary in quadrupedal amniotes were dissociated anteroposteriorly in a colubrid snake, these observations support the hypothesis that structures usually associated with the neck–trunk boundary in quadrupedal squamates are displaced relative to one another in snakes. Whereas certain craniovertebral muscles are elongated in some snakes, results of optimization on an ophidian cladogram show that the most recent common ancestor of extant snakes would have had the longest craniovertebral muscle, M. rectus capitis anterior, that is elongated only by several segments compared with that of quadrupedal squamates. Therefore, even such a posteriorly displaced “cervical” characteristic plesiomorphically lies fairly anteriorly in the greatly elongated precloacal region of snakes, suggesting that the trunk, not the neck, would have contributed most to the elongation of the snake precloacal region. A similar dissociation of structures usually associated with the neck–trunk boundary in quadrupedal squamates is observed in limb‐reduced squamates, suggesting that these forms and snakes may share a developmental mechanism producing modifications in the anterior–posterior patterning associated with body elongation. J. Morphol. 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Functional morphology of amplexus (clasping) in spinicaudatan clam shrimps (Crustacea,Branchiopoda) and its evolution in bivalved branchiopods: A video‐based analysis

Male clam shrimps (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, and Cyclestherida) have their first one or two trunk limb pairs modified as “claspers,” which are used to hold the female during mating and mate guarding. Clasper morphology has traditionally been important for clam shrimp taxonomy and classification, but little is known about how the males actually use the claspers during amplexus (clasping). Homologies of the various clasper parts (“movable finger,” “large palp,” “palm,” “gripping area,” and “small palp”) have long been discussed between the three clam shrimp taxa, and studies have shown that only some structures are homologous while others are convergent (“partial homology”). We studied the clasper functionality in four spinicaudatan species using video recordings and scanning electron microscopy, and compared our results with other clam shrimp groups. General mating behavior and carapace morphology was also studied. Generally, spinicaudatan and laevicaudatan claspers function similarly despite some parts being nonhomologous. We mapped clasper morphology and functionality aspects on a branchiopod phylogeny. We suggest that the claspers of the three groups were adapted from an original, simpler clasper, each for a “stronger” grip on the female's carapace margin: 1) Spinicaudata have two clasper pairs bearing an elongated apical club/gripping area with one setal type; 2); Cyclestherida have one clasper pair with clusters of molariform setae on the gripping area and at the movable finger apex; and 3) Laevicaudata have one clasper pair, but have incorporated an additional limb portion into the clasper palm and bear a diverse set of setae. J. Morphol. 278:523–546, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

SEM studies on the early larval development of Triops cancriformis (Bosc)(Crustacea: Branchiopoda, Notostraca)

We investigated early larval development in the notostracan Triops cancriformis (Bosc, 1801–1802) raised from dried cysts under laboratory conditions. We document the five earliest stages using scanning electron microscopy. The stage I larva is a typical nauplius, lecithotropic and without trunk limbs. The stage II larva is feeding and has trunk limb precursors and a larger carapace. Stage III larvae have larger trunk limbs and a more adult shape. Stage IV larvae have well developed trunk limbs, and stage V larvae show atrophy of the antennae. We describe the ontogeny of selected features such as trunk limbs and carapace, discuss ontogeny and homologization of head appendages, follow the development of the feeding mechanism, and discuss trunk limb ontogeny.     

Limb development in a primitive crustacean,Triops longicaudatus: subdivision of the early limb bud gives rise to multibranched limbs

 Recent advances in developmental genetics of Drosophila have uncovered some of the key molecules involved in the positioning and outgrowth of the leg primordia. Although expression patterns of these molecules have been analyzed in several arthropod species, broad comparisons of mechanisms of limb development among arthropods remain somewhat speculative since no detailed studies of limb development exist for crustaceans, the postulated sister group of insects. As a basis for such comparisons, we analysed limb development in a primitive branchiopod crustacean, Triops longicaudatus. Adults have a series of similar limbs with eight branches or lobes that project from the main shaft. Phalloidin staining of developing limbs buds shows the distal epithelial ridge of the early limb bud exhibits eight folds that extend in a dorsal ventral (D/V) arc across the body. These initial folds subsequently form the eight lobes of the adult limb. This study demonstrates that, in a primitive crustacean, branched limbs do not arise via sequential splitting. Current models of limb development based on Drosophila do not provide a mechanism for establishing eight branches along the D/V axis of a segment. Although the events that position limbs on a body segment appear to be conserved between insects and crustaceans, mechanisms of limb branching may not. Received: 28 February 1996/Accepted: 24 June 1996     

Muscle development in dendrobranchiate shrimp, with comparison with Artemia

The muscle pattern of malacostracan and entomostracan crustacean nauplius larvae was compared using fluorescent phallotoxins. In the dendrobranchiate malacostracan Sicyonia ingentis, F-actin staining was first detected in limb setae at 12 h, likely within sensory nerves. Staining of F-actin was detected in the trunk at 15 h and grew into the naupliar limbs. Sarcomeres were detected at 19 h, identifying the structures as extrinsic limb muscles. The extrinsic limb muscles enlarged but retained their general pattern during the later nauplius stages. Longitudinal trunk muscles and circumferential visceral muscle (VM) developed in the post-naupliar region during nauplius instars 4 and 5, at the time when the gut also formed. In the anostracan branchiopod Artemia salina, the newly hatched nauplius contained an extensive system of extrinsic and intrinsic limb muscles. The gut was almost complete at hatching, along with its associated circumferential VM. Muscles similar in position and structure could be identified in nauplii from the two taxa, but different anatomical origins of extrinsic muscles were evident. Whether the naupliar limb muscles are homologous in malacostracans and branchiopods remains an open question. The strong musculature of the dendrobranchiate naupliar limbs correlates with the use of all three pairs of limbs for swimming.