Activation mechanisms of αVβ3 integrin by binding to fibronectin: A computational study

Integrin αVβ3 plays an important role in regulating cellular activities and in human diseases. Although the structure of αVβ3 has been studied by crystallography and electron microscopy, the detailed activation mechanism of integrin αVβ3 induced by fibronectin remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the conformational and dynamical motion changes of Mn²⁺‐bound integrin αVβ3 by binding to fibronectin with molecular dynamics simulations. Results showed that fibronectin binding to integrin αVβ3 caused the changes of the conformational flexibility of αVβ3 domains, the essential mode of motion for the domains of αV subunit and β3 subunit and the degrees of correlated motion of residues between the domains of αV subunit and β3 subunit of integrin αVβ3. The angle of Propeller domain with respect to the Calf‐2 domain of αV subunit and the angle of Hybrid domain with respect to βA domain of β3 subunit significantly increased when integrin αVβ3 was bound to fibronectin. These changes could result in the conformational change tendency of αVβ3 from a bend conformation to an extended conformation and lead to the open swing of Hybrid domain relative to βA domain of β3 subunit, which have demonstrated their importance for αVβ3 activation. Fibronectin binding to integrin αVβ3 significantly decreased the relative position of α1 helix to βA domain and that to metal ion‐dependent adhesion site, stabilized Mn²⁺ ions binding in integrin αVβ3 and changed fibronectin conformation, which are important for αVβ3 activation. Results from this study provide important molecular insight into the “outside‐in” activation mechanism of integrin αVβ3 by binding to fibronectin.     

Integrin αvβ3 enhances the suppressive effect of interferon‐γ on hematopoietic stem cells

Hematopoietic homeostasis depends on the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which are regulated within a specialized bone marrow (BM) niche. When HSC sense external stimuli, their adhesion status may be critical for determining HSC cell fate. The cell surface molecule, integrin αvβ3, is activated through HSC adhesion to extracellular matrix and niche cells. Integrin β3 signaling maintains HSCs within the niche. Here, we showed the synergistic negative regulation of the pro‐inflammatory cytokine interferon‐γ (IFNγ) and β3 integrin signaling in murine HSC function by a novel definitive phenotyping of HSCs. Integrin αvβ3 suppressed HSC function in the presence of IFNγ and impaired integrin β3 signaling mitigated IFNγ‐dependent negative action on HSCs. During IFNγ stimulation, integrin β3 signaling enhanced STAT1‐mediated gene expression via serine phosphorylation. These findings show that integrin β3 signaling intensifies the suppressive effect of IFNγ on HSCs, which indicates that cell adhesion via integrin αvβ3 within the BM niche acts as a context‐dependent signal modulator to regulate the HSC function under both steady‐state and inflammatory conditions.     

Engineered cystine knot peptides that bind αvβ3, αvβ5, and α5β1 integrins with low‐nanomolar affinity

There is a critical need for compounds that target cell surface integrin receptors for applications in cancer therapy and diagnosis. We used directed evolution to engineer the Ecballium elaterium trypsin inhibitor (EETI‐II), a knottin peptide from the squash family of protease inhibitors, as a new class of integrin‐binding agents. We generated yeast‐displayed libraries of EETI‐II by substituting its 6‐amino acid trypsin binding loop with 11‐amino acid loops containing the Arg‐Gly‐Asp integrin binding motif and randomized flanking residues. These libraries were screened in a high‐throughput manner by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting to identify mutants that bound to α_vβ₃ integrin. Select peptides were synthesized and were shown to compete for natural ligand binding to integrin receptors expressed on the surface of U87MG glioblastoma cells with half‐maximal inhibitory concentration values of 10–30 nM. Receptor specificity assays demonstrated that engineered knottin peptides bind to both α_vβ₃ and α_vβ₅ integrins with high affinity. Interestingly, we also discovered a peptide that binds with high affinity to α_vβ₃, α_vβ₅, and α₅β₁ integrins. This finding has important clinical implications because all three of these receptors can be coexpressed on tumors. In addition, we showed that engineered knottin peptides inhibit tumor cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix protein vitronectin, and in some cases fibronectin, depending on their integrin binding specificity. Collectively, these data validate EETI‐II as a scaffold for protein engineering, and highlight the development of unique integrin‐binding peptides with potential for translational applications in cancer. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Impaired integrin α5/β1‐mediated hepatocyte growth factor release by stellate cells of the aged liver

Hepatic blood flow and sinusoidal endothelial fenestration decrease during aging. Consequently, fluid mechanical forces are reduced in the space of Disse where hepatic stellate cells (HSC) have their niche. We provide evidence that integrin α₅/β₁ is an important mechanosensor in HSC involved in shear stress‐induced release of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), an essential inductor of liver regeneration which is impaired during aging. The expression of the integrin subunits α₅ and β₁ decreases in liver and HSC from aged rats. CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated integrin α₅ and β₁ knockouts in isolated HSC lead to lowered HGF release and impaired cellular adhesion. Fluid mechanical forces increase integrin α₅ and laminin gene expression whereas integrin β₁ remains unaffected. In the aged liver, laminin β2 and γ1 protein chains as components of laminin‐521 are lowered. The integrin α₅ knockout in HSC reduces laminin expression via mechanosensory mechanisms. Culture of HSC on nanostructured surfaces functionalized with laminin‐521 enhances Hgf expression in HSC, demonstrating that these ECM proteins are critically involved in HSC function. During aging, HSC acquire a senescence‐associated secretory phenotype and lower their growth factor expression essential for tissue repair. Our findings suggest that impaired mechanosensing via integrin α₅/β₁ in HSC contributes to age‐related reduction of ECM and HGF release that could affect liver regeneration.     

Signalling mechanisms of the leukocyte integrin αMβ2: Current and future perspectives

Integrins are a family of heterodimeric cell adhesion receptors expressed on most cells and are involved in many cellular functions including phagocytosis, a process by which professional phagocytes recognise, bind and internalise foreign materials larger than 0.5 µm in diameter. An example of a phagocytic integrin receptor is αMβ2, and this review seeks to provide fresh insights into the current knowledge of this subject. Key areas that this review will emphasise include, the classical understanding of bi‐directional signalling to and from αMβ2 (aka inside‐out and outside‐in signalling, respectively). For inside‐out signalling, we will review the involvement of the small GTPase, Rap1, FERM‐containing proteins such as talin and kindlin‐3, some of the kinases, and the GEF, cytohesin‐1 and vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). We also summarise studies into outside‐in signalling, focussing on the roles of RhoA and RhoG, and activation of Rac1 through the complex comprising TIAM, 14‐3‐3 and β2. We will also consider non‐classical signalling processes, which include integrin clustering and membrane ruffling. Through this review, we hope to highlight the importance of αMβ2 signalling mechanisms and their relevance to other integrin‐mediated events.     

Cyclic strain induces reorganization of integrin α5β1 and α2β1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells

Cyclic strain has been shown to modulate endothelial cell (EC) morphology, proliferation, and function. We have recently reported that the focal adhesion proteins focal adhesion kinase (pp125^FAK) and paxillin, are tyrosine phosphorylated in EC exposed to strain and these events regulate the morphological change and migration induced by cyclic strain. Integrins are also localized on focal adhesion sites and have been reported to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of pp125^FAK under a variety of stimuli. To study the involvement of different integrins in signaling induced by cyclic strain, we first observed the redistribution of α and β integrins in EC subjected to 4 h cyclic strain. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) seeded on either fibronectin or collagen surfaces were subjected to 10% average strain at a frequency 60 cycles/min. Confocal microscopy revealed that β₁ integrin reorganized in a linear pattern parallel with the long axis of the elongated cells creating a fusion of focal adhesion plaques in EC plated on either fibronectin (a ligand for α₅β₁) or collagen (a ligand for α₂β₁) coated plates after 4 h exposure to cyclic strain. β₃ integrin, which is a vitronectin receptor, did not redistribute in EC exposed to cyclic strain. Cyclic strain also led to a reorganization of α₅ and α₂ integrins in a linear pattern in HUVEC seeded on fibronectin or collagen, respectively. The expression of integrins α₅, α₂, and β₁ did not change even after 24 h exposure to strain when assessed by immunoprecipitation of these integrins. Cyclic strain-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of pp125^FAK occurred concomitant with the reorganization of β₁ integrin. We concluded that α₅β₁ and α₂β₁ integrins play an important role in transducing mechanical stimuli into intracellular signals. J. Cell. Biochem. 64:505–513. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Rap1 controls activation of the αMβ2 integrin in a talin‐dependent manner

The small GTPase Rap1 and the cytoskeletal protein talin regulate binding of C3bi‐opsonised red blood cells (RBC) to integrin α_Mβ₂ in phagocytic cells, although the mechanism has not been investigated. Using COS‐7 cells transfected with α_Mβ₂, we show that Rap1 acts on the β₂ and not the α_M chain, and that residues 732–761 of the β₂ subunit are essential for Rap1‐induced RBC binding. Activation of α_Mβ₂ by Rap1 was dependent on W747 and F754 in the β₂ tails, which are required for talin head binding, suggesting a link between Rap1 and talin in this process. Using talin1 knock‐out cells or siRNA‐mediated talin1 knockdown in the THP‐1 monocytic cell line, we show that Rap1 acts upstream of talin but surprisingly, RIAM knockdown had little effect on integrin‐mediated RBC binding or cell spreading. Interestingly, Rap1 and talin influence each other's localisation at phagocytic cups, and co‐immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that they interact together. These results show that Rap1‐mediated activation of α_Mβ₂ in macrophages shares both common and distinct features from Rap1 activation of α_IIbβ₃ expressed in CHO cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 111: 999–1009, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Advances and perspectives of the architecture of hemidesmosomes: Lessons from structural biology

Hemidesmosomes (HD) are adhesive protein complexes that mediate stable attachment of basal epithelial cells to the underlying basement membrane. The organization of HDs relies on a complex network of protein-protein interactions, in which integrin α6β4 and plectin play an essential role. Here we summarize the current knowledge of the structure of hemidesmosomal proteins, which includes the structures of the first and second fibronectin type III (FnIII) domains and the calx-β domain of the integrin β4 subunit, the actin binding domain of plectin, and two non-overlapping pairs of spectrin repeats of plectin and BPAG1e. Binding of plectin to the β4 subunit is critical for the formation and the stability of HDs. The recent 3D structure of the primary complex between the integrin β4 subunit and plectin has provided a first insight into the macromolecular recognition mechanisms responsible for HD assembly. Two missense mutations in β4 linked to non lethal forms of epidermolysis bullosa map on the plectin-binding surface. Finally, the formation of the β4-plectin complex induces conformational changes in β4 and plectin, suggesting that their interaction may be subject to allosteric regulation.     

Role of the I-domain in collagen binding specificity and activation of the integrins α1β1 and α2β1

Adhesion to collagens by most cell types is mediated by the integrins α1β1 and α2β1. Both integrin α subunits belong to a group which is characterized by the presence of an I domain in the N-terminal half of the molecule, and this domain has been implicated in the ligand recognition. Since purified α1β1 and α2β1 differ in their binding to collagens I and IV and recognize different sites within the major cell binding domain of collagen IV, we investigated the potential role of the α1 and α2 I domains in specific collagen adhesion. We find that introducing the α2 I domain into α1 results in surface expression of a functional collagen receptor. The adhesion mediated by this chimeric receptor (α1-2-1β1) is similar to the adhesion profile conferred by α2β1, not α1β1. The presence of α2 or α1-2-1 results in preferential binding to collagen I, whereas α1 expressing cells bind better to collagen IV. In addition, α1 containing cells bind to low amounts of a tryptic fragment of collagen IV, whereas α2 or α1-2-1 bearing cells adhere only to high concentrations of this substrate. We also find that collagen adhesion of NIH-3T3 mediated by α2β1 or α1-2-1β1, but not by α1, requires the presence of Mn²⁺ ions. This ion requirement was not found in CHO cells, implicating the I domain in cell type-specific activation of integrins. J. Cell. Physiol. 176:634–641, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Mapping of heparin/heparan sulfate binding sites on αvβ3 integrin by molecular docking

Heparin/heparan sulfate interact with growth factors, chemokines, extracellular proteins, and receptors. Integrins are αβ heterodimers that serve as receptors for extracellular proteins, regulate cell behavior, and participate in extracellular matrix assembly. Heparin binds to RGD‐dependent integrins (αIIbβ3, α5β1, αvβ3, and αvβ5) and to RGD‐independent integrins (α4β1, αXβ2, and αMβ2), but their binding sites have not been located on integrins. We report the mapping of heparin binding sites on the ectodomain of αvβ3 integrin by molecular modeling. The surface of the ectodomain was scanned with small rigid probes mimicking the sulfated domains of heparan sulfate. Docking results were clustered into binding spots. The best results were selected for further docking simulations with heparin hexasaccharide. Six potential binding spots containing lysine and/or arginine residues were identified on the ectodomain of αvβ3 integrin. Heparin would mostly bind to the top of the genu domain, the Calf‐I domain of the α subunit, and the top of the β subunit of RGD‐dependent integrins. Three spots were close enough from each other on the integrin surface to form an extended binding site that could interact with heparin/heparan sulfate chains. Because heparin does not bind to the same integrin site as protein ligands, no steric hindrance prevents the formation of ternary complexes comprising the integrin, its protein ligand, and heparin/heparan sulfate. The basic amino acid residues predicted to interact with heparin are conserved in the sequences of RGD‐dependent but not of RGD‐independent integrins suggesting that heparin/heparan sulfate could bind to different sites on these two integrin subfamilies. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Osteopontin mediates macrophage chemotaxis via α4 and α9 integrins and survival via the α4 integrin

Osteopontin (OPN) is highly expressed by macrophages and plays a key role in the pathology of several chronic inflammatory diseases including atherosclerosis and the foreign body reaction. However, the molecular mechanism behind OPN regulation of macrophage functions is not well understood. OPN is a secreted molecule and interacts with several integrins via two domains: the RGD sequence binding to α_v‐containing integrins, and the SLAYGLR sequence binding to α₄β₁, α₄β₇, and α₉β₁ integrins. Here we determined the role of OPN in macrophage survival, chemotaxis, and activation state. For survival studies, OPN treated‐bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDMs) were challenged with growth factor withdrawal and neutralizing integrin antibodies. We found that survival in BMDMs is mediated primarily through the α₄ integrin. In chemotaxis studies, we observed that migration to OPN was blocked by neutralizing α₄ and α₉ integrin antibodies. Further, OPN did not affect macrophage activation as measured by IL‐12 production. Finally, the relative contributions of the RGD and the SLAYGLR functional domains of OPN to leukocyte recruitment were evaluated in an in vivo model. We generated chimeric mice expressing mutated forms of OPN in myeloid‐derived leukocytes, and found that the SLAYGLR functional domain of OPN, but not the RGD, mediates macrophage accumulation in response to thioglycollate‐elicited peritonitis. Collectively, these data indicate that α₄ and α₉ integrins interacting with OPN via the SLAYGLR domain play a key role in macrophage biology by regulating migration, survival, and accumulation. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 1194–1202, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Identification of active sequences in human laminin α5 G domain

Human laminin‐511 (α5β1γ1) and its truncated protein, laminin‐511 E8 fragment, bind to integrin α6β1 and have been widely used for embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell culture under feeder‐free conditions. In this study, we focused on human laminin α5 chain G domain, which is thought to be critical for the biological functions of laminin‐511, and screened its biologically active sequences using a synthetic peptide library. We synthesized 115 peptides (hA5G1‐hA5G115) covering the entire laminin α5 chain G domain and evaluated cell attachment activity using both the peptide‐coated plate and peptide‐chitosan matrix (peptide‐ChtM) assays. Seventeen peptides demonstrated cell attachment activity in the assays. Both hA5G18 and hA5G26‐coated plates and hA5G74‐ChtMs promoted integrin β1‐mediated cell attachment. These findings are useful for the study of molecular mechanisms of laminin‐511, and the active peptides have a potential for use as a molecular probe for cell adhesion receptors.     

Talin‐driven inside‐out activation mechanism of platelet αIIbβ3 integrin probed by multimicrosecond,all‐atom molecular dynamics simulations

Platelet aggregation is the consequence of the binding of extracellular bivalent ligands such as fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor to the high affinity, active state of integrin αIIbβ3. This state is achieved through a so‐called “inside‐out” mechanism characterized by the membrane‐assisted formation of a complex between the F2 and F3 subdomains of intracellular protein talin and the integrin β3 tail. Here, we present the results of multi‐microsecond, all‐atom molecular dynamics simulations carried on the complete transmembrane (TM) and C‐terminal (CT) domains of αIIbβ3 integrin in an explicit lipid‐water environment, and in the presence or absence of the talin‐1 F2 and F3 subdomains. These large‐scale simulations provide unprecedented molecular‐level insights into the talin‐driven inside‐out activation of αIIbβ3 integrin. Specifically, they suggest a preferred conformation of the complete αIIbβ3 TM/CT domains in a lipid‐water environment, and testable hypotheses of key intermolecular interactions between αIIbβ3 integrin and the F2/F3 domains of talin‐1. Notably, not only do these simulations give support to a stable left‐handed reverse turn conformation of the αIIb juxtamembrane motif rather than a helical turn, but they raise the question as to whether TM helix separation is required for talin‐driven integrin activation. Proteins 2014; 82:3231–3240. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The structure of the integrin αIIbβ3 transmembrane complex explains integrin transmembrane signalling

Heterodimeric integrin adhesion receptors regulate cell migration, survival and differentiation in metazoa by communicating signals bi‐directionally across the plasma membrane. Protein engineering and mutagenesis studies have suggested that the dissociation of a complex formed by the single‐pass transmembrane (TM) segments of the α and β subunits is central to these signalling events. Here, we report the structure of the integrin αIIbβ3 TM complex, structure‐based site‐directed mutagenesis and lipid embedding estimates to reveal the structural event that underlies the transition from associated to dissociated states, that is, TM signalling. The complex is stabilized by glycine‐packing mediated TM helix crossing within the extracellular membrane leaflet, and by unique hydrophobic and electrostatic bridges in the intracellular leaflet that mediate an unusual, asymmetric association of the 24‐ and 29‐residue αIIb and β3 TM helices. The structurally unique, highly conserved integrin αIIbβ3 TM complex rationalizes bi‐directional signalling and represents the first structure of a heterodimeric TM receptor complex.     

Expression of estrogen receptor β increases integrin α1 and integrin β1 levels and enhances adhesion of breast cancer cells

Estrogen effects on mammary gland development and differentiation are mediated by two receptors (ERα and ERβ). Estrogen‐bound ERα induces proliferation of mammary epithelial and cancer cells, while ERβ is important for maintenance of the differentiated epithelium and inhibits proliferation in different cell systems. In addition, the normal breast contains higher ERβ levels compared to the early stage breast cancers, suggesting that loss of ERβ could be important in cancer development. Analysis of ERβ?/? mice has consistently revealed reduced expression of cell adhesion proteins. As such, ERβ is a candidate modulator of epithelial homeostasis and metastasis. Consequently, the aim of this study was to analyze estrogenic effects on adhesion of breast cancer cells expressing ERα and ERβ. As ERβ is widely found in breast cancer but not in cell lines, we used ERα positive T47‐D and MCF‐7 human breast cancer cells to generate cells with inducible ERβ expression. Furthermore, the colon cancer cell lines SW480 and HT‐29 were also used. Integrin α1 mRNA and protein levels increased following ERβ expression. Integrin β1—the unique partner for integrin α1—increased only at the protein level. ERβ expression enhanced the formation of vinculin containing focal complexes and actin filaments, indicating a more adhesive potential. This was confirmed by adhesion assays where ERβ increased adhesion to different extracellular matrix proteins, mostly laminin. In addition, ERβ expression was associated to less cell migration. These results indicate that ERβ affects integrin expression and clustering and consequently modulates adhesion and migration of breast cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 222:156–167, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Divalent cations regulate the organization of integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 on the cell surface

Extracellular divalent cations are important regulators of integrin ligand binding activity. In this study we evaluated how divalent cations affect the organization of integrins into focal adhesion sites. Integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 were compared because they share a high degree of structural homology and because both integrins mediate cell adhesion to vitronectin. On MG-63 osteosarcoma cells, we found that both the extent and pattern of integrin organization was regulated by the type of extracellular divalent ion. Integrin αvβ3 organized in focal contacts when Mn²⁺ or Mg²⁺ was present, but not in Ca²⁺. In contrast, αvβ5 organized in focal contacts only when Ca²⁺ or Mg²⁺ was present. Integrin αvβ5 clustered in a centrally located punctate field on the ventral surface of the cell in the presence of Mn²⁺. These observations reveal a previously unappreciated role for divalent ions in regulating the organization of integrins into focal adhesion sites. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Steps in integrin β1-chain glycosylation mediated by TGFβ1 signaling through ras

Ras is activated by transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) in several cell types, but the biological consequences of this activation are largely unknown. We now show that ras mediates two stages in integrin β1-chain maturation: 1) glycosylation of the 86-kD core peptide, which is a TGFβ1-independent process, and 2) TGFβ1-mediated conversion of the 115-kD β1 integrin precursor into the mature 130-kD form. HD3 colon epithelial cells maintain elevated levels of integrin α2β1 heterodimers, strong binding to collagen I, and autocrine regulation by TGFβ1, which converts β1 integrin into the mature cell surface form. Each of three HD3 cell clones that stably express dominant negative ras (N17ras) exhibited abnormal glycosylation of the integrin β1-chain, decreased cell surface expression of the mature integrin β1, and impaired binding to collagen and laminin. Autocrine levels of TGFβ were not altered by expression of N17ras. The aberrant glycosylation of the integrin β1-chain was reversed by antisense oligonucleotides specific to the DNA sequence encoding the rasS17N mutation. Glycosylation of the 86-kD core peptide was delayed in the N17ras transfectants, but was not altered by either the addition of TGFβ1 or inhibition of autocrine TGFβ1. In contrast, conversion of the partially glycosylated β1 integrin precursor into the mature 130-kD isoform was accelerated by exogenous TGFβ1 and blocked by neutralizing antibody to autocrine TGFβ1 in control cell lines. Neither effect was seen in the N17ras transfectants, indicating that TGFβ1 modulates integrin β1-chain maturation by activating ras proteins. Cell fractionation studies demonstrated that this conversion takes place within the Golgi. J. Cell. Physiol. 181:33–44, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Cross-talk between integrin α6β4 and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) through direct α6β4 binding to IGF1 and subsequent α6β4-IGF1-IGF1R ternary complex formation in anchorage-independent conditions

Integrin αvβ3 plays a role in insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF1) signaling (integrin-IGF1 receptor (IGF1R) cross-talk). The specifics of the cross-talk are, however, unclear. In a current model, "ligand occupancy" of αvβ3 (i.e. the binding of extracellular matrix proteins) enhances signaling induced by IGF1 binding to IGF1R. We recently reported that IGF1 directly binds to αvβ3 and induces αvβ3-IGF1-IGF1R ternary complex formation. Consistently, the integrin binding-defective IGF1 mutant (R36E/R37E) is defective in inducing ternary complex formation and IGF signaling, but it still binds to IGF1R. Like αvβ3, integrin α6β4 is overexpressed in many cancers and is implicated in cancer progression. Here, we discovered that α6β4 directly bound to IGF1, but not to R36E/R37E. Grafting the β4 sequence WPNSDP (residues 167-172), which corresponds to the specificity loop of β3, to integrin β1 markedly enhanced IGF1 binding to β1, suggesting that the WPNSDP sequence is involved in IGF1 recognition. WT IGF1 induced α6β4-IGF1-IGF1R ternary complex formation, whereas R36E/R37E did not. When cells were attached to matrix, exogenous IGF1 or α6β4 expression had little or no effect on intracellular signaling. When cell-matrix adhesion was reduced (in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-coated plates), IGF1 induced intracellular signaling and enhanced cell survival in an α6β4-dependent manner. Also IGF1 enhanced colony formation in soft agar in an α6β4-dependent manner. These results suggest that IGF binding to α6β4 plays a major role in IGF signaling in anchorage-independent conditions, which mimic the in vivo environment, and is a novel therapeutic target.