心脏疾病中G蛋白的变化

G蛋白是一类重要的信号转导分子,其生理功能是将细胞膜受体所识别的各种细胞外信号同细胞内一系列效应分子偶联起来,引起核基因转录及蛋白质结构和功能的变化。G蛋白在心脏表达的亚型有Gs、Gi/o、Gq／11、G12／13,参与心肌收缩力、心率、心律和心肌细胞生长的调节。本文着重讨论了心脏G蛋白的分类、结构和功能,以及在心肌肥大、心力衰竭、急性心肌缺血和心律失常等心脏疾病中的改变,以加深对这些疾病的发病机制和病理生理过程的认识。     

Alternate coupling of receptors to Gs and Gi in pancreatic and submandibular gland cells.

Many Gs-coupled receptors can activate both cAMP and Ca2+ signaling pathways. Three mechanisms for dual activation have been proposed. One is receptor coupling to both Gs and G15 (a Gq class heterotrimeric G protein) to initiate independent signaling cascades that elevate intracellular levels of cAMP and Ca+2, respectively. The other two mechanisms involve cAMP-dependent protein kinase-mediated activation of phospholipase Cbeta either directly or by switching receptor coupling from Gs to Gi. These mechanisms were primarily inferred from studies with transfected cell lines. In native cells we found that two Gs-coupled receptors (the vasoactive intestinal peptide and beta-adrenergic receptors) in pancreatic acinar and submandibular gland duct cells, respectively, evoke a Ca2+ signal by a mechanism involving both Gs and Gi. This inference was based on the inhibitory action of antibodies specific for Galphas, Galphai, and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, pertussis toxin, RGS4, a fragment of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase and inhibitors of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. By contrast, Ca2+ signaling evoked by Gs-coupled receptor agonists was not blocked by Gq class-specific antibodies and was unaffected in Galpha15 -/- knockout mice. We conclude that sequential activation of Gs and Gi, mediated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase, may represent a general mechanism in native cells for dual stimulation of signaling pathways by Gs-coupled receptors.     

Emerging structural biology of lipid G protein‐coupled receptors

The first crystal structure of a G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) was that of the bovine rhodopsin, solved in 2000, and is a light receptor within retina rode cells that enables vision by transducing a conformational signal from the light‐induced isomerization of retinal covalently bound to the receptor. More than 7 years after this initial discovery and following more than 20 years of technological developments in GPCR expression, stabilization, and crystallography, the high‐resolution structure of the adrenaline binding β₂‐adrenergic receptor, a ligand diffusible receptor, was discovered. Since then, high‐resolution structures of more than 53 unique GPCRs have been determined leading to a significant improvement in our understanding of the basic mechanisms of ligand‐binding and ligand‐mediated receptor activation that revolutionized the field of structural molecular pharmacology of GPCRs. Recently, several structures of eight unique lipid‐binding receptors, one of the most difficult GPCR families to study, have been reported. This review presents the outstanding structural and pharmacological features that have emerged from these new lipid receptor structures. The impact of these findings goes beyond mechanistic insights, providing evidence of the fundamental role of GPCRs in the physiological integration of the lipid signaling system, and highlighting the importance of sustained research into the structural biology of GPCRs for the development of new therapeutics targeting lipid receptors.     

Signaling via histamine receptors in cat duodenal smooth muscle cells

Histamine produced concentration-dependent contractions in cat duodenal smooth muscle cells that were obtained by enzymatic digestion of smooth muscle with collagenase F. Pyrilamine, an H1 receptor antagonist, inhibited the contractile response while famotidine, an H2 receptor antagonist, augmented it. In cells with selectively preserved H1 receptors, produced by pretreatment with pyrilamine followed by inactivation of all unprotected receptors with N-ethylmaleimide, histamine-induced contraction was significantly augmented as compared with control cells. Pertussis toxin (PTX) had no effect on contraction, suggesting that the H1 receptor is coupled to a PTX-insensitive G protein. Gi2, Gi3, Go, Gs, and Gq subunits were present in cat duodenum, and histamine-induced contraction was inhibited by Gq antibody after cell permeabilization. Neomycin, a PLC inhibitor, inhibited the histamine-induced cell contraction, but not rhoCMB, a PLD inhibitor, or DEDA, a PLA2 inhibitor. Heparin, an IP3 receptor inhibitor, inhibited contraction whereas chelerythrine, a PKC inhibitor, had no effect. We conclude that histamine-induced contraction in cat duodenal smooth muscle cells is mediated by H1 receptors coupled to a PTX-insensitive Gq protein and results in activation of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC).     

Mechanisms of extracellularly regulated kinases 1/2 activation in adrenal glomerulosa cells by lysophosphatidic acid and epidermal growth factor

The regulation of adrenal function, including aldosterone production from adrenal glomerulosa cells, is dependent on a variety of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). In many cell types, GPCR-mediated MAPK activation is mediated through transactivation of RTKs, in particular the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGF-R). However, the extent to which this cross-communication between GPCRs and RTKs is operative in the adrenal glomerulosa has not been defined. Bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells express receptors for lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and EGF. In cultured bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells, LPA, which is predominantly coupled to Gi and partially to Gq/protein kinase C alpha and epsilon, caused phosphorylation of Src (at Tyr416), proline-rich tyrosine kinase (Pyk2 at Tyr402), EGF-R, protein kinase B/Akt, extracellularly regulated signal kinases 1/2, and their dependent protein, p90 ribosomal S6 kinase. Overexpression of dominant negative mutants of Ras or EGF-R, and selective inhibition of EGF-R kinase with AG1478, significantly reduced LPA-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation. However, this was not impaired by inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and heparin-binding EGF. LPA-induced ERK1/2 activation occurs predominantly through EGF-R transactivation by Gi/Src and partly through activation of protein kinase C, which acts downstream of EGF-R and Ras. In contrast, LPA-induced phosphorylation of Shc and ERK1/2 in clonal hepatocytes (C9 cells) was primarily mediated through MMP-dependent transactivation of the EGF-R. These observations in adrenal glomerulosa and hepatic cells demonstrate that LPA phosphorylates ERK1/2 through EGF-R transactivation in a MMP-dependent or -independent manner in individual target cells. This reflects the ability of GPCRs expressed in cell lines and neoplastic cells to utilize distinct signaling pathways that can elicit altered responses compared with those of native tissues.     

Heterodimerization of apelin receptor and neurotensin receptor 1 induces phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and cell proliferation via Gαq‐mediated mechanism

Dimerization of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) is crucial for receptor function including agonist affinity, efficacy, trafficking and specificity of signal transduction, including G protein coupling. Emerging data suggest that the cardiovascular system is the main target of apelin, which exerts an overall neuroprotective role, and is a positive regulator of angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in heart failure. Moreover, ACE2 cleaves off C‐terminal residues of vasoactive peptides including apelin‐13, and neurotensin that activate the apelin receptor (APJ) and neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) respectively, that belong to the A class of GPCRs. Therefore, based on the similar mode of modification by ACE2 at peptide level, the homology at amino acid level and the capability of forming dimers with other GPCRs, we have been suggested that APJ and NTSR1 can form a functional heterodimer. Using co‐immunoprecipitation, BRET and FRET, we provided conclusive evidence of heterodimerization between APJ and NTSR1 in a constitutive and induced form. Upon agonist stimulation, hetrodimerization enhanced ERK_1/2 activation and increased proliferation via activation of Gq α‐subunits. These novel data provide evidence for a physiological role of APJ/NTSR1 heterodimers in terms of ERK_1/2 activation and increased intracellular calcium and induced cell proliferation and provide potential new pharmaceutical targets for cardiovascular disease.     

Pre‐synaptic GABAB receptors inhibit glutamate release through GIRK channels in rat cerebral cortex

Neuronal G protein‐gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels mediate the slow inhibitory effects of many neurotransmitters post‐synaptically. However, no evidence exists that supports that GIRK channels play any role in the inhibition of glutamate release by GABA_B receptors. In this study, we show for the first time that GABA_B receptors operate through two mechanisms in nerve terminals from the cerebral cortex. As shown previously, GABA_B receptors reduces glutamate release and the Ca²⁺ influx mediated by N‐type Ca²⁺ channels in a mode insensitive to the GIRK channel blocker tertiapin‐Q and consistent with direct inhibition of this voltage‐gated Ca²⁺ channel. However, by means of weak stimulation protocols, we reveal that GABA_B receptors also reduce glutamate release mediated by P/Q‐type Ca²⁺ channels, and that these responses are reversed by the GIRK channel blocker tertiapin‐Q. Consistent with the functional interaction between GABA_B receptors and GIRK channels at nerve terminals we demonstrate by immunogold electron immunohistochemistry that pre‐synaptic boutons of asymmetric synapses co‐express GABA_B receptors and GIRK channels, thus suggesting that the functional interaction of these two proteins, found at the post‐synaptic level, also occurs at glutamatergic nerve terminals.     

A Single Conserved Leucine Residue on the First Intracellular Loop Regulates ER Export of G Protein‐Coupled Receptors

The intrinsic structural determinants for export trafficking of G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been mainly identified in the termini of the receptors. In this report, we determined the role of the first intracellular loop (ICL1) in the transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the cell surface of GPCRs. The α_2B‐adrenergic receptor (AR) mutant lacking the ICL1 is unable to traffic to the cell surface and to initiate signaling measured as ERK1/2 activation. Mutagenesis studies identify a single Leu48 residue in the ICL1 modulates α_2B‐AR export from the ER. The ER export function of the Leu48 residue can be substituted by Phe, but not Ile, Val, Tyr and Trp, and is unlikely involved in correct folding or dimerization of α_2B‐AR in the ER. Importantly, the isolated Leu residue is remarkably conserved in the center of the ICL1s among the family A GPCRs and is also required for the export to the cell surface of β₂‐AR, α_1B‐AR and angiotensin II type 1 receptor. These data indicate a crucial role for a single Leu residue within the ICL1 in ER export of GPCRs.     

Up-regulation of GABAB Receptor Signaling by Constitutive Assembly with the K+ Channel Tetramerization Domain-containing Protein 12 (KCTD12)

GABA_B receptors are the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) for GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. Native GABA_B receptors comprise principle and auxiliary subunits that regulate receptor properties in distinct ways. The principle subunits GABA_B1a, GABA_B1b, and GABA_B2 form fully functional heteromeric GABA_B(1a,2) and GABA_B(1b,2) receptors. Principal subunits regulate forward trafficking of the receptors from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane and control receptor distribution to axons and dendrites. The auxiliary subunits KCTD8, -12, -12b, and -16 are cytosolic proteins that influence agonist potency and G-protein signaling of GABA_B(1a,2) and GABA_B(1b,2) receptors. Here, we used transfected cells to study assembly, surface trafficking, and internalization of GABA_B receptors in the presence of the KCTD12 subunit. Using bimolecular fluorescence complementation and metabolic labeling, we show that GABA_B receptors associate with KCTD12 while they reside in the endoplasmic reticulum. Glycosylation experiments support that association with KCTD12 does not influence maturation of the receptor complex. Immunoprecipitation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer experiments demonstrate that KCTD12 remains associated with the receptor during receptor activity and receptor internalization from the cell surface. We further show that KCTD12 reduces constitutive receptor internalization and thereby increases the magnitude of receptor signaling at the cell surface. Accordingly, knock-out or knockdown of KCTD12 in cultured hippocampal neurons reduces the magnitude of the GABA_B receptor-mediated K⁺ current response. In summary, our experiments support that the up-regulation of functional GABA_B receptors at the neuronal plasma membrane is an additional physiological role of the auxiliary subunit KCTD12.     

Sex‐specific alterations in GABA receptor‐mediated responses in laterodorsal tegmentum are associated with prenatal exposure to nicotine

Smoking during pregnancy is associated with deleterious physiological and cognitive effects on the offspring, which are likely due to nicotine‐induced alteration in the development of neurotransmitter systems. Prenatal nicotine exposure (PNE) in rodents is associated with changes in behaviors controlled in part by the pontine laterodorsal tegmentum (LDT), and LDT excitatory signaling is altered in a sex and age‐dependent manner by PNE. As effects on GABAergic LDT signaling are unknown, we used calcium imaging to evaluate GABA_A receptor‐ (GABA_AR as well as GABA_A‐_ρR) and GABA_B receptor (GABA_BR)‐mediated calcium responses in LDT brain slices from female and male PNE mice in two different age groups. Overall, in older PNE females, changes in calcium induced by stimulation of GABA_AR and GABA_BR, including GABA_A‐_ρR were shifted toward calcium rises. In both young and old males, PNE was associated with alterations in calcium mediated by all three receptors; however, the GABA_AR was the most affected. These results show for the first time that PNE is associated with alterations in GABAergic transmission in the LDT in a sex‐ and age‐dependent manner, and these data are the first to show PNE‐associated alterations in functionality of GABA receptors in any nucleus. PNE‐associated alterations in LDT GABAergic transmission within the LDT would be expected to alter output to target regions and could play a role in LDT‐implicated, negative behavioral outcomes following gestational exposure to smoking. Accordingly, our data provide further supportive evidence of the importance of eliminating the consumption of nicotine during pregnancy.     

β‐arrestin1 phosphorylation by GRK5 regulates G protein‐independent 5‐HT4 receptor signalling

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been found to trigger G protein‐independent signalling. However, the regulation of G protein‐independent pathways, especially their desensitization, is poorly characterized. Here, we show that the G protein‐independent 5‐HT₄ receptor (5‐HT₄R)‐operated Src/ERK (extracellular signal‐regulated kinase) pathway, but not the G_s pathway, is inhibited by GPCR kinase 5 (GRK5), physically associated with the proximal region of receptor’ C‐terminus in both human embryonic kidney (HEK)‐293 cells and colliculi neurons. This inhibition required two sequences of events: the association of β–arrestin1 to a phosphorylated serine/threonine cluster located within the receptor C‐t domain and the phosphorylation, by GRK5, of β–arrestin1 (at Ser⁴¹²) bound to the receptor. Phosphorylated β‐arrestin1 in turn prevented activation of Src constitutively bound to 5‐HT₄Rs, a necessary step in receptor‐stimulated ERK signalling. This is the first demonstration that β‐arrestin1 phosphorylation by GRK5 regulates G protein‐independent signalling.     

A mouse model for visualization of GABAB receptors

GABA_B receptors are the G‐protein‐coupled receptors for the neurotransmitter γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA). Receptor subtypes are based on the subunit isoforms GABA_B1a and GABA_B1b, which combine with GABA_B2 subunits to form heteromeric receptors. Here, we used a modified bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) containing the GABA_B1 gene to generate transgenic mice expressing GABA_B1a and GABA_B1b subunits fused to the enhanced green fluorescence protein (eGFP). We demonstrate that the GABA_B1‐eGFP fusion proteins reproduce the cellular expression patterns of endogenous GABA_B1 proteins in the brain and in peripheral tissue. Crossing the GABA_B1‐eGFP BAC transgene into the GABA_B1^?/? background restores pre and postsynaptic GABA_B functions, showing that the GABA_B1‐eGFP fusion proteins substitute for the lack of endogenous GABA_B1 proteins. Finally, we demonstrate that the GABA_B1‐eGFP fusion proteins replicate the temporal expression patterns of native GABA_B receptors in cultured neurons. These transgenic mice therefore provide a validated tool for direct visualization of native GABA_B receptors. genesis 47:595–602, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Reconstitution reveals additional roles for N- and C-terminal domains of g(alpha) in muscarinic receptor coupling

The molecular basis for selectivity of M1 and M2 muscarinic receptor coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins has been studied using receptors expressed in Sf9 cell membranes and reconstituted with purified chimeric G(alpha) subunits containing different regions of Gi1alpha and Gq(alpha). The abilities of G protein heterotrimers containing chimeric alpha subunits to stabilize the high-affinity state of the receptors for agonist and to undergo receptor stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange was compared with G protein heterotrimers containing either native Gi1alpha or Gq(alpha). The data confirm the importance of the proper context of the C-terminus of Galpha by demonstrating that the C-terminus of Gi1alpha, when placed in the context of Gq(alpha), prevents coupling to muscarinic M1 receptors, while the C-terminus of Gq(alpha), when placed in the context of Gi1alpha, prevents coupling to muscarinic M2 receptors. However, C-terminal amino acids of Gq(alpha) placed in the context of Gi1alpha were not sufficient to allow M1 receptor coupling, nor were C-terminal amino acids of Gi1alpha placed in the context of Gq(alpha) sufficient for M2 receptor coupling. The unique six amino acid N-terminal extension of Gq(alpha) when added to the N-terminus of Gi1alpha neither prevented M2 receptor coupling nor permitted M1 receptor coupling. A Gi1alpha-based chimera containing both N- and C-terminal regions of Gq(alpha) gained the ability to productively couple M1 receptors suggesting that the proper context of both N- and C-termini is required for muscarinic receptor coupling.     

Cre‐dependent DREADD (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs) mice

DREADDs, designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs, are engineered G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCR) which can precisely control GPCR signaling pathways (for example, Gq, Gs, and Gi). This chemogenetic technology for control of GPCR signaling has been successfully applied in a variety of in vivo studies, including in mice, to remotely control GPCR signaling, for example, in neurons, glia cells, pancreatic β‐cells, or cancer cells. In order to fully explore the in vivo applications of the DREADD technology, we generated hM3Dq and hM4Di strains of mice which allow for Cre recombinase‐mediated restricted expression of these pathway‐selective DREADDs. With the many Cre driver lines now available, these DREADD lines will be applicable to studying a wide array of research and preclinical questions. genesis 54:439–446, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Signaling mechanisms and physiological functions of G‐protein Gα13 in blood vessel formation,bone homeostasis,and cancer

Heterotrimeric G‐proteins are cellular signal transducers. They mainly relay signals from G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs function as guanine nucleotide‐exchange factors to active these G‐proteins. Based on the sequence and functional similarities, these G‐proteins are grouped into four subfamilies: G_s, G_i, G_q, and G_12/13. The G_12/13 subfamily consists of two members: G₁₂ and G₁₃. G_12/13‐mediated signaling pathways play pivotal roles in a variety of physiological processes, while aberrant regulation of this pathway has been identified in various human diseases. Here we summarize the signaling mechanisms and physiological functions of Gα₁₃ in blood vessel formation and bone homeostasis. We further discuss the expanding roles of Gα₁₃ in cancers, serving as oncogenes as well as tumor suppressors.     

Structural biology of G protein‐coupled receptor signaling complexes

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of cell surface receptors that mediate numerous cell signaling pathways, and are targets of more than one‐third of clinical drugs. Thanks to the advancement of novel structural biology technologies, high‐resolution structures of GPCRs in complex with their signaling transducers, including G‐protein and arrestin, have been determined. These 3D complex structures have significantly improved our understanding of the molecular mechanism of GPCR signaling and provided a structural basis for signaling‐biased drug discovery targeting GPCRs. Here we summarize structural studies of GPCR signaling complexes with G protein and arrestin using rhodopsin as a model system, and highlight the key features of GPCR conformational states in biased signaling including the sequence motifs of receptor TM6 that determine selective coupling of G proteins, and the phosphorylation codes of GPCRs for arrestin recruitment. We envision the future of GPCR structural biology not only to solve more high‐resolution complex structures but also to show stepwise GPCR signaling complex assembly and disassembly and dynamic process of GPCR signal transduction.     

The third intracellular loop stabilizes the inactive state of the neuropeptide Y1 receptor

Constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can signal even in the absence of ligand binding. Most Class I GPCRs are stabilized in the resting conformation by intramolecular interactions involving transmembrane domain (TM) 3 and TM6, particularly at loci 6.30 and 6.34 of TM6. Signaling by Gi/Go-coupled receptors such as the Neuropeptide Y1 receptor decreases already low basal metabolite levels. Thus, we examined constitutive activity using a biochemical assay mediated by a Gi/Gq chimeric protein and a more direct electrophysiological assay. Wild-type (WT-Y1) receptors express no measurable, agonist-independent activation, while mu-opioid receptors (MOR) and P2Y12 purinoceptors showed clear evidence of constitutive activation, especially in the electrophysiological assay. Neither point mutations at TM6 (T6.30A or N6.34A) nor substitution of the entire TM3 and TM6 regions from the MOR into the Y1 receptor increased basal WT-Y1 activation. By contrast, chimeric substitution of the third intracellular loop (ICL3) generated a constitutively active, Y1-ICL3-MOR chimera. Furthermore, the loss of stabilizing interactions from the native ICL3 enhanced the role of surrounding residues to permit basal receptor activation; because constitutive activity of the Y1-ICL3-MOR chimera was further increased by point mutation at locus 6.34, which did not alter WT-Y1 receptor activity. Our results indicate that the ICL3 stabilizes the Y1 receptor in the inactive state and confers structural properties critical for regulating Y receptor activation and signal transduction. These studies reveal the active participation of the ICL3 in the stabilization and activation of Class I GPCRs.     

Interactions of endothelin receptor subtypes A and B with Gi, Go, and Gq in reconstituted phospholipid vesicles

To understand the biochemical basis for the functional divergence of the human endothelin receptor subtypes A (ETAR) and B (ETBR), they were expressed, purified from insect Sf9 cells, and reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles with the Go, Gq, and Gi proteins. For each G protein, a unique pattern of reactivity was observed with the different receptor subtypes. Both ETAR and ETBR activated Go to a similar maximal extent, and both subtypes activated Gq with similar EC50 values; however, the ETAR displayed a 2-3-fold higher maximal extent of activation. In contrast, both subtypes activated Gi to a similar maximal extent, but the ETAR displayed a 4-fold higher EC50 value as compared to the ETBR. To test whether these coupling specificities are influenced by C-terminal palmitoylation of the receptor, we mutated a cluster of cysteine residues near the end of the seventh transmembrane helix in both receptors. While the cysteine mutations in the ETBR resulted in a partially palmitoylated receptor, the replacement of these cysteine residues in the ETAR yielded a mostly palmitoyl-deficient receptor and had no effect on Go activation, but caused a reduction in the extents of Gi and Gq stimulation. Together, these studies provide important insights into the specificity of G protein coupling in the endothelin receptors. The ability to discriminate between the different G proteins under various physiological conditions may be a key element in the selection of distinct signal transduction pathways by the two receptor subtypes.     

A rapid fluorogenic GPCR–β‐arrestin interaction assay

Detection of protein–protein interactions involved in signal transduction in live cells and organisms has a variety of important applications. We report a fluorogenic assay for G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR)–β‐arrestin interaction that is genetically encoded, generalizes to multiple GPCRs, and features high signal‐to‐noise because fluorescence is absent until its components interact upon GPCR activation. Fluorescence after protease‐activated receptor‐1 activation developed in minutes and required specific serine–threonine residues in the receptor carboxyl tail, consistent with a classical G protein‐coupled receptor kinase dependent β‐arrestin recruitment mechanism. This assay provides a useful complement to other in vivo assays of GPCR activation.     

Elastic network normal mode dynamics reveal the GPCR activation mechanism

G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCR) are a family of membrane‐embedded metabotropic receptors which translate extracellular ligand binding into an intracellular response. Here, we calculate the motion of several GPCR family members such as the M2 and M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, the A_2A adenosine receptor, the β₂‐adrenergic receptor, and the CXCR4 chemokine receptor using elastic network normal modes. The normal modes reveal a dilation and a contraction of the GPCR vestibule associated with ligand passage, and activation, respectively. Contraction of the vestibule on the extracellular side is correlated with cavity formation of the G‐protein binding pocket on the intracellular side, which initiates intracellular signaling. Interestingly, the normal modes of rhodopsin do not correlate well with the motion of other GPCR family members. Electrostatic potential calculation of the GPCRs reveal a negatively charged field around the ligand binding site acting as a siphon to draw‐in positively charged ligands on the membrane surface. Altogether, these results expose the GPCR activation mechanism and show how conformational changes on the cell surface side of the receptor are allosterically translated into structural changes on the inside. Proteins 2014; 82:579–586. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.