Distinct roles for β‐arrestin2 and arrestin‐domain‐containing proteins in β2 adrenergic receptor trafficking

β‐arrestin 1 and 2 (also known as arrestin 2 and 3) are homologous adaptor proteins that regulate seven‐transmembrane receptor trafficking and signalling. Other proteins with predicted ‘arrestin‐like’ structural domains but lacking sequence homology have been indicated to function like β‐arrestin in receptor regulation. We demonstrate that β‐arrestin2 is the primary adaptor that rapidly binds agonist‐activated β₂ adrenergic receptors (β₂ARs) and promotes clathrin‐dependent internalization, E3 ligase Nedd4 recruitment and ubiquitin‐dependent lysosomal degradation of the receptor. The arrestin‐domain‐containing (ARRDC) proteins 2, 3 and 4 are secondary adaptors recruited to internalized β₂AR–Nedd4 complexes on endosomes and do not affect the adaptor roles of β‐arrestin2. Rather, the role of ARRDC proteins is to traffic Nedd4–β₂AR complexes to a subpopulation of early endosomes.     

Insights into β2‐adrenergic receptor binding from structures of the N‐terminal lobe of ARRDC3

ARRDC3 is one of six known human α‐arrestins, and has been implicated in the downregulation of the β2‐adrenergic receptor (β2AR). ARRDC3 consists of a two‐lobed arrestin fold and a C‐terminal tail containing two PPYX motifs. In the current model for receptor downregulation by ARRDC3, the arrestin fold portion is thought to bind the receptor, while the PPXY motifs recruit ubiquitin ligases of the NEDD4 family. Here we report the crystal structures of the N‐terminal lobe of human ARRDC3 in two conformations, at 1.73 and 2.8 Å resolution, respectively. The structures reveal a large electropositive region that is capable of binding phosphate ions of crystallization. Residues within the basic patch were shown to be important for binding to β2AR, similar to the situation with β‐arrestins. This highlights potential parallels in receptor recognition between α‐ and β‐arrestins.     

β1‐adrenergic receptor antagonists signal via PDE4 translocation

It is generally assumed that antagonists of G_s‐coupled receptors do not activate cAMP signalling, because they do not stimulate cAMP production via G_s‐protein/adenylyl cyclase activation. Here, we report a new signalling pathway whereby antagonists of β₁‐adrenergic receptors (β₁ARs) increase cAMP levels locally without stimulating cAMP production directly. Binding of antagonists causes dissociation of a preformed complex between β₁ARs and Type‐4 cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDE4s). This reduces the local concentration of cAMP‐hydrolytic activity, thereby increasing submembrane cAMP and PKA activity. Our study identifies receptor/PDE4 complex dissociation as a novel mechanism of antagonist action that contributes to the pharmacological properties of β₁AR antagonists and might be shared by other receptor subtypes.     

Arrestin domain‐containing protein 3 recruits the NEDD4 E3 ligase to mediate ubiquitination of the β2‐adrenergic receptor

Prolonged stimulation of the β2‐adrenergic receptor (β2AR) leads to receptor ubiquitination and downregulation. Using a genome‐wide RNA interference screen, we identified arrestin domain‐containing 3 (ARRDC3) as a gene required for β2AR regulation. The ARRDC3 protein interacts with ubiquitin ligase neural precursor development downregulated protein 4 (NEDD4) through two conserved PPXY motifs and recruits NEDD4 to the activated receptor. The ARRDC3 protein also interacts and co‐localizes with activated β2AR. Knockdown of ARRDC3 expression abolishes the association between NEDD4 and β2AR. Furthermore, functional inactivation of ARRDC3, either through small interfering RNA (siRNA)‐mediated knockdown or overexpression of a mutant that does not interact with NEDD4, blocks receptor ubiquitination and degradation. Our results establish ARRDC3 as an essential adaptor for β2AR ubiquitination.     

β-hexosaminidase immunolocalization and α- and β-subunit gene expression in the rat testis and epididymis

β-hexosaminidase is an essential lysosomal enzyme whose absence in man results in a group of disorders, the G_M2 gangliosidoses. β-hexosaminidase activity is many times higher in the epididymis than in other tissues, is present in sperm, and is postulated to be required for mammalian fertilization. To better understand which cells are responsible for β-hexosaminidase expression and how it is regulated in the male reproductive system, we quantitated the mRNA expression of the α- and β-subunits of β-hexosaminidase and carried out immunocytochemical localization studies of the enzyme in the rat testis and epididymis. β-hexosaminidase α-subunit mRNA was abundant and differentially expressed in the adult rat testis and epididymis, at 13- and 2-fold brain levels, respectively. In contrast, β-subunit mRNA levels in the testis and epididymis were 0.3- and 5-fold brain levels. During testis development from 7–91 postnatal days of age, testis levels of α-subunit mRNA increased 10-fold and coincided with the appearance of spermatocytes and spermatids in the epithelium; in contrast, β-subunit mRNA was expressed at low levels throughout testis development. In isolated male germ cells, β-hexosaminidase α-subunit expression was most abundant in haploid round spermatids, whereas the β-subunit mRNA was not detected in germ cells. Within the epididymis both α- and β-subunit mRNA concentrations were highest in the corpus, with 1.5-fold and 9-fold initial segment values, respectively. Light microscopic immunocytochemistry revealed that β-hexosaminidase was localized to Sertoli cells and interstitial macrophages in the testis. In the epididymis, β-hexosaminidase staining was most intense in narrow cells in the initial segment, principal cells in the caput, and proximal corpus, and clear cells throughout the duct. Electron microscopic immunocytochemistry revealed that β-hexosaminidase was predominantly present in lysosomes in Sertoli and epididymal cells. The cellular and regional specificity of β-hexosaminidase immunolocalization suggest an important role for the enzyme in testicular and epididymal functions. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 46:227–242, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Components of the Gs signaling cascade exhibit distinct changes in mobility and membrane domain localization upon β2‐adrenergic receptor activation

The G protein signaling cascade is a key player in cell signaling. Cascade activation leads to a redistribution of its members in various cellular compartments. These changes are likely related to the “second wave” of signaling from endosomes. Here, we set out to determine whether G_s signaling cascade members expressed at very low levels exhibit altered mobility and localize in clathrin‐coated structures (CCSs) or caveolae upon activation by β₂‐adrenergic receptors (β₂AR). Activated β₂AR showed decreased mobility and sustained accumulation in CCSs but not in caveolae. Arrestin 3 translocated to the plasma membrane after β₂AR activation and showed very low mobility and pronounced accumulation in CCSs. In contrast, Gα_s and Gγ₂ exhibited a modest reduction in mobility but no detectable accumulation in or exclusion from CCSs or caveolae. The effector adenylyl cyclase 5 (AC5) showed a slight mobility increase upon β₂AR stimulation, no redistribution to CCSs, and weak activation‐independent accumulation in caveolae. Our findings show an overall decrease in the mobility of most activated G_s signaling cascade members and confirm that β₂AR and arrestin 3 accumulate in CCSs, while Gα_s, Gγ₂ and AC5 can transiently enter CCSs and caveolae but do not accumulate in and are not excluded from these domains.     

β‐arrestin‐1 mediates the TCR‐triggered re‐routing of distal receptors to the immunological synapse by a PKC‐mediated mechanism

T‐cell receptors (TCR) recognize their antigen ligand at the interface between T cells and antigen‐presenting cells, known as the immunological synapse (IS). The IS provides a means of sustaining the TCR signal which requires the continual supply of new TCRs. These are endocytosed and redirected from distal membrane locations to the IS. In our search for novel cytoplasmic effectors, we have identified β‐arrestin‐1 as a ligand of non‐phosphorylated resting TCRs. Using dominant‐negative and knockdown approaches we demonstrate that β‐arrestin‐1 is required for the internalization and downregulation of non‐engaged bystander TCRs. Furthermore, TCR triggering provokes the β‐arrestin‐1‐mediated downregulation of the G‐protein coupled chemokine receptor CXCR4, but not of other control receptors. We demonstrate that β‐arrestin‐1 recruitment to the TCR, and bystander TCR and CXCR4 downregulation, are mechanistically mediated by the TCR‐triggered PKC‐mediated phosphorylation of β‐arrestin‐1 at Ser163. This mechanism allows the first triggered TCRs to deliver a stop migration signal, and to promote the internalization of distal TCRs and CXCR4 and their translocation to the IS. This receptor crosstalk mechanism is critical to sustain the TCR signal.     

The importance of valine 114 in ligand binding in β2‐adrenergic receptor

G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane signaling molecules, with a majority of them performing important physiological roles. β₂‐Adrenergic receptor (β₂‐AR) is a well‐studied GPCRs that mediates natural responses to the hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline. Analysis of the ligand‐binding region of β₂‐AR using the recently solved high‐resolution crystal structures revealed a number of highly conserved amino acids that might be involved in ligand binding. However, detailed structure‐function studies on some of these residues have not been performed, and their role in ligand binding remains to be elucidated. In this study, we have investigated the structural and functional role of a highly conserved residue valine 114, in hamster β₂‐AR by site‐directed mutagenesis. We replaced V114 in hamster β₂‐AR with a number of amino acid residues carrying different functional groups. In addition to the complementary substitutions V114I and V114L, the V114C and V114E mutants also showed significant ligand binding and agonist dependent G‐protein activation. However, the V114G, V114T, V114S, and V114W mutants failed to bind ligand in a specific manner. Molecular modeling studies were conducted to interpret these results in structural terms. We propose that the replacement of V114 influences not only the interaction of the ethanolamine side‐chains but also the aryl‐ring of the ligands tested. Results from this study show that the size and orientation of the hydrophobic residue at position V114 in β₂‐AR affect binding of both agonists and antagonists, but it does not influence the receptor expression or folding.     

Competing G protein‐coupled receptor kinases balance G protein and β‐arrestin signaling

Seven‐transmembrane receptors (7TMRs) are involved in nearly all aspects of chemical communications and represent major drug targets. 7TMRs transmit their signals not only via heterotrimeric G proteins but also through β‐arrestins, whose recruitment to the activated receptor is regulated by G protein‐coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). In this paper, we combined experimental approaches with computational modeling to decipher the molecular mechanisms as well as the hidden dynamics governing extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) activation by the angiotensin II type 1A receptor (AT_1AR) in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells. We built an abstracted ordinary differential equations (ODE)‐based model that captured the available knowledge and experimental data. We inferred the unknown parameters by simultaneously fitting experimental data generated in both control and perturbed conditions. We demonstrate that, in addition to its well‐established function in the desensitization of G‐protein activation, GRK2 exerts a strong negative effect on β‐arrestin‐dependent signaling through its competition with GRK5 and 6 for receptor phosphorylation. Importantly, we experimentally confirmed the validity of this novel GRK2‐dependent mechanism in both primary vascular smooth muscle cells naturally expressing the AT_1AR, and HEK293 cells expressing other 7TMRs.     

Functional α1‐ and β2‐adrenergic receptors in human osteoblasts

Central (hypothalamic) control of bone mass is proposed to be mediated through β2‐adrenergic receptors (β2‐ARs). While investigations in mouse bone cells suggest that epinephrine enhances both RANKL and OPG mRNA via both β‐ARs and α‐ARs, whether α‐ARs are expressed in human bone cells is controversial. The current study investigated the expression of α1‐AR and β2‐AR mRNA and protein and the functional role of adrenergic stimulation in human osteoblasts (HOBs). Expression of α1B‐ and β2‐ARs was examined by RT‐PCR, immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blot (for α1B‐ARs). Proliferation in HOBs was assessed by ³H‐thymidine incorporation and expression of RANKL and OPG was determined by quantitative RT‐PCR. RNA message for α1B‐ and β2‐ARs was expressed in HOBs and MG63 human osteosarcoma cells. α1B‐ and β2‐AR immunofluorescent localization in HOBs was shown for the first time by deconvolution microscopy. α1B‐AR protein was identified in HOBs by Western blot. Both α1‐agonists and propranolol (β‐blocker) increased HOB replication but fenoterol, a β2‐agonist, inhibited it. Fenoterol nearly doubled RANKL mRNA and this was inhibited by propranolol. The α1‐agonist cirazoline increased OPG mRNA and this increase was abolished by siRNA knockdown of α1B‐ARs in HOBs. These data indicate that both α1‐ARs and β2‐ARs are present and functional in HOBs. In addition to β2‐ARs, α1‐ARs in human bone cells may play a role in modulation of bone turnover by the sympathetic nervous system. J. Cell. Physiol. 220: 267–275, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The stress response neuropeptide CRF increases amyloid‐β production by regulating γ‐secretase activity

The biological underpinnings linking stress to Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk are poorly understood. We investigated how corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF), a critical stress response mediator, influences amyloid‐β (Aβ) production. In cells, CRF treatment increases Aβ production and triggers CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1) and γ‐secretase internalization. Co‐immunoprecipitation studies establish that γ‐secretase associates with CRFR1; this is mediated by β‐arrestin binding motifs. Additionally, CRFR1 and γ‐secretase co‐localize in lipid raft fractions, with increased γ‐secretase accumulation upon CRF treatment. CRF treatment also increases γ‐secretase activity in vitro, revealing a second, receptor‐independent mechanism of action. CRF is the first endogenous neuropeptide that can be shown to directly modulate γ‐secretase activity. Unexpectedly, CRFR1 antagonists also increased Aβ. These data collectively link CRF to increased Aβ through γ‐secretase and provide mechanistic insight into how stress may increase AD risk. They also suggest that direct targeting of CRF might be necessary to effectively modulate this pathway for therapeutic benefit in AD, as CRFR1 antagonists increase Aβ and in some cases preferentially increase Aβ42 via complex effects on γ‐secretase.     

Desensitization of β‐adrenergic receptors in lung injury induced by 2‐chloroethyl ethyl sulfide,a mustard analog

2‐Choloroethyl Ethyl Sulfide (CEES) exposure causes inflammatory lung diseases, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis. This may be associated with oxidative stress, which has been implicated in the desensitization of beta‐adrenergic receptors (β‐ARs). The objective of this study was to investigate whether lung injury induced by intratracheal CEES exposure (2 mg/kg body weight) causes desensitization of β‐ARs. The animals were sacrificed after 7 days and lungs were removed. Lung injury was established by measuring the leakage of iodinated‐bovine serum albumin ([¹²⁵I]‐BSA) into lung tissue. Receptor‐binding characteristics were determined by measuring the binding of [³H] dihydroalprenolol ([³H] DHA) (0.5–24 nM) to membrane fraction in the presence and absence of DLDL ‐propranolol (10 μ M). Both high‐ and low‐affinity β‐ARs were identified in the lung. Binding capacity was significantly higher in low‐affinity site in both control and experimental groups. Although CEES exposure did not change K_D and B_max at the high‐affinity site, it significantly decreased both K_D and B_max at low affinity sites. A 20% decrease in β₂‐AR mRNA level and a 60% decrease in membrane protein levels were observed in the experimental group. Furthermore, there was significantly less stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity by both cholera toxin and isoproterenol in the experimental group in comparison to the control group. Treatment of lungs with 3‐isobutyl‐1‐methylxanthine (IBMX), an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE) could not abolish the difference between the control group and the experimental group on the stimulation of the adenylate cyclase activity. Thus, our study indicates that CEES‐induced lung injury is associated with desensitization of β₂‐AR. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 23:59–70, 2009; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/jbt.20265     

Effects of the β‐agonist,isoprenaline, on the down‐regulation,functional responsiveness and trafficking of β2‐adrenergic receptors with N‐terminal polymorphisms

The β₂‐AR (β₂‐adrenergic receptor) is an important target for respiratory and CVD (cardiovascular disease) medications. Clinical studies suggest that N‐terminal polymorphisms of β₂‐AR may act as disease modifiers. We hypothesized that polymorphisms at amino acids 16 and 27 result in differential trafficking and down‐regulation of β₂‐AR variants following β‐agonist exposure. The functional consequences of the four possible combinations of these polymorphisms in the human β₂‐AR (designated β₂‐AR‐RE, β₂‐AR‐GE, β₂‐AR‐RQ and β₂‐AR‐GQ) were studied using site‐directed mutagenesis and recombinant expression in HEK‐293 cells (human embryonic kidney cells). Ligand‐binding assays demonstrated that after 24 h exposure to 1 μM isoprenaline, isoforms with Arg¹⁶ (β₂‐AR‐RE and β₂‐AR‐RQ) underwent increased down‐regulation compared with isoforms with Gly¹⁶ (β₂‐AR‐GE and β₂‐AR‐GQ). Consistent with these differences in down‐regulation between isoforms, prolonged isoprenaline treatment resulted in diminished cAMP response to subsequent isoprenaline challenge in β₂‐AR‐RE relative to β₂‐AR‐GE. Confocal microscopy revealed that the receptor isoforms had similar co‐localization with the early endosomal marker EEA1 following isoprenaline treatment, suggesting that they had similar patterns of internalization. None of the isoforms exhibited significant co‐localization with the recycling endosome marker Rab11 in response to isoprenaline treatment. Furthermore, we found that prolonged isoprenaline treatment led to a higher degree of co‐localization of β₂‐AR‐RE with the lysosomal marker LAMP1 (lysosome‐associated membrane protein 1) compared with that of β₂‐AR‐GE. Taken together, these results indicate that a mechanism responsible for differential responses of these receptor isoforms to the β‐agonist involves differences in the efficiency with which agonist‐activated receptors are trafficked to the lysosomes for degradation, or differences in degradation in the lysosomes.     

Calcium sensing receptor stimulates breast cancer cell migration via the Gβγ-AKT-mTORC2 signaling pathway

Calcium sensing receptor, a pleiotropic G protein coupled receptor, activates secretory pathways in cancer cells and putatively exacerbates their metastatic behavior. Here, we show that various CaSR mutants, identified in breast cancer patients, differ in their ability to stimulate Rac, a small Rho GTPase linked to cytoskeletal reorganization and cell protrusion, but are similarly active on the mitogenic ERK pathway. To investigate how CaSR activates Rac and drives cell migration, we used invasive MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. We revealed, by pharmacological and knockdown strategies, that CaSR activates Rac and cell migration via the Gβγ-PI3K-mTORC2 pathway. These findings further support current efforts to validate CaSR as a relevant therapeutic target in metastatic cancer.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12079-021-00662-y.     

Involvement of β‐adrenergic receptor in synaptic vesicle swelling and implication in neurotransmitter release

Secretory vesicle swelling is required for vesicular discharge during cell secretion. The G_αo‐mediated water channel aquaporin‐6 (AQP‐6) involvement in synaptic vesicle (SV) swelling in neurons has previously been reported. Studies demonstrate that in the presence of guanosine triphosphate (GTP), mastoparan, an amphiphilic tetradecapeptide from wasp venom, activates G_o protein GTPase, and stimulates SV swelling. Stimulation of G proteins is believed to occur via insertion of mastoparan into the phospholipid membrane to form a highly structured α‐helix that resembles the intracellular loops of G protein‐coupled adrenergic receptors. Consequently, the presence of adrenoceptors and the presence of an endogenous β‐adrenergic agonist at the SV membrane is suggested. Immunoblot analysis of SV using β‐adrenergic receptor antibody, and vesicle swelling experiments using β‐adrenergic agonists and antagonists, demonstrate the presence of functional β‐adrenergic receptors at the SV membrane. Since a recent study shows vH⁺‐ATPase to be upstream of AQP‐6 in the pathway leading from G_αo‐mediated swelling of SV, participation of an endogenous β‐adrenergic agonist, in the binding and stimulation of its receptor to initiate the swelling cascade is demonstrated.     

Binding of rat α1-inhibitor-3-methylamine to the α2-macroglobulin signaling receptor induces second messengers

Binding of receptor-recognized forms of tetrameric human α₂-macroglobulin (α₂M*) to a macrophage signaling receptor induces cAMP synthesis, increases in inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP₃) synthesis, and a concomitant rise in cytosolic free calcium ([Ca²⁺]_i). The α₂M* signaling receptor is coupled to a pertussis-toxin insensitive G protein. Binding of α₂M* also occurs to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/α₂M receptor (LRP/α₂MR), but this binding does not induce signal transduction. Rat α₁-inhibitor-3 (α₁I₃) is a monomeric member of the α-macroglobulin/complement superfamily. Like α₂M, it can react with proteinases or methylamine which induces a conformational change causing activated α₁I₃ to bind to LRP/α₂MR. We now report that α₁I₃-methylamine binds to the macrophage α₂M* signaling receptor inducing a rapid rise in the synthesis of IP₃ with a subsequent 1.5- to 3-fold rise in [Ca²⁺]_i. α₁I₃-methylamine binding to macrophages also caused a statistically significant elevation in cAMP. Native α₁I₃, like α₂M, was unable to induce signal transduction. α₁I₃ forms a complex with α₁-microglobulin, which has a distinct conformation from α₁I₃ and is recognized by LRP/α₂MR. This complex also induces an increase in [Ca²⁺]_i comparable to the effect of α₁I₃-methylamine on macrophages. It is concluded that activation of α₁I₃ by methylamine or binding of α₁-microglobulin causes similar conformational changes in the inhibitor, exposing the receptor recognition site for the α₂M* signaling receptor, as well as for LRP/α₂MR. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Structural classification of αββ and ββα supersecondary structure units in proteins

We present a fully automatic structural classification of supersecondary structure units, consisting of two hydrogen-bonded β strands, preceded or followed by an α helix. The classification is performed on the spatial arrangement of the secondary structure elements, irrespective of the length and conformation of the intervening loops. The similarity of the arrangements is estimated by a structure alignment procedure that uses as similarity measure the root mean square deviation of superimposed backbone atoms. Applied to a set of 141 well-resolved nonhomologous protein structures, the classification yields 11 families of recurrent arrangements. In addition, fragments that are structurally intermediate between the families are found; they reveal the continuity of the classification. The analysis of the families shows that the α helix and β hairpin axes can adopt virtually all relative orientations, with, however, some preferable orientations; moreover, according to the orientation, preferences in the left/right handedness of the α–β connection are observed. These preferences can be explained by favorable side by side packing of the α helix and the β hairpin, local interactions in the region of the α–β connection or stabilizing environments in the parent protein. Furthermore, fold recognition procedures and structure prediction algorithms coupled to database-derived potentials suggest that the preferable nature of these arrangements does not imply their intrinsic stability. They usually accommodate a large number of sequences, of which only a subset is predicted to stabilize the motif. The motifs predicted as stable could correspond to nuclei formed at the very beginning of the folding process. Proteins 30:193–212, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.