Specific but interdependent functions for Arabidopsis AGO4 and AGO6 in RNA‐directed DNA methylation

Argonaute (AGO) family proteins are conserved key components of small RNA‐induced silencing pathways. In the RNA‐directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway in Arabidopsis, AGO6 is generally considered to be redundant with AGO4. In this report, our comprehensive, genomewide analyses of AGO4‐ and AGO6‐dependent DNA methylation revealed that redundancy is unexpectedly negligible in the genetic interactions between AGO4 and AGO6. Immunofluorescence revealed that AGO4 and AGO6 differ in their subnuclear co‐localization with RNA polymerases required for RdDM. Pol II and AGO6 are absent from perinucleolar foci, where Pol V and AGO4 are co‐localized. In the nucleoplasm, AGO4 displays a strong co‐localization with Pol II, whereas AGO6 co‐localizes with Pol V. These patterns suggest that RdDM is mediated by distinct, spatially regulated combinations of AGO proteins and RNA polymerases. Consistently, Pol II physically interacts with AGO4 but not AGO6, and the levels of Pol V‐dependent scaffold RNAs and Pol V chromatin occupancy are strongly correlated with AGO6 but not AGO4. Our results suggest that AGO4 and AGO6 mainly act sequentially in mediating small RNA‐directed DNA methylation.     

Histone H4K20 tri‐methylation at late‐firing origins ensures timely heterochromatin replication

Among other targets, the protein lysine methyltransferase PR‐Set7 induces histone H4 lysine 20 monomethylation (H4K20me1), which is the substrate for further methylation by the Suv4‐20h methyltransferase. Although these enzymes have been implicated in control of replication origins, the specific contribution of H4K20 methylation to DNA replication remains unclear. Here, we show that H4K20 mutation in mammalian cells, unlike in Drosophila, partially impairs S‐phase progression and protects from DNA re‐replication induced by stabilization of PR‐Set7. Using Epstein–Barr virus‐derived episomes, we further demonstrate that conversion of H4K20me1 to higher H4K20me2/3 states by Suv4‐20h is not sufficient to define an efficient origin per se, but rather serves as an enhancer for MCM2‐7 helicase loading and replication activation at defined origins. Consistent with this, we find that Suv4‐20h‐mediated H4K20 tri‐methylation (H4K20me3) is required to sustain the licensing and activity of a subset of ORCA/LRWD1‐associated origins, which ensure proper replication timing of late‐replicating heterochromatin domains. Altogether, these results reveal Suv4‐20h‐mediated H4K20 tri‐methylation as a critical determinant in the selection of active replication initiation sites in heterochromatin regions of mammalian genomes.     

RNA‐directed DNA methylation requires an AGO4‐interacting member of the SPT5 elongation factor family

Recent studies have identified a conserved WG/GW‐containing motif, known as the Argonaute (AGO) hook, which is involved in the recruitment of AGOs to distinct components of the eukaryotic RNA silencing pathways. By using this motif as a model to detect new components in plant RNA silencing pathways, we identified SPT5‐like, a plant‐specific AGO4‐interacting member of the nuclear SPT5 (Suppressor of Ty insertion 5) RNA polymerase (RNAP) elongation factor family that is characterized by the presence of a carboxy‐terminal extension with more than 40 WG/GW motifs. Knockout SPT5‐like mutants show a decrease in the accumulation of several 24‐nt RNAs and hypomethylation at different loci revealing an implication in RNA‐directed DNA methylation (RdDM). Here, we propose that SPT5‐like emerged in plants as a facultative RNAP elongation factor. Its plant‐specific origin and role in RdDM might reflect functional interactions with plant‐specific RNA Pols required for RdDM.     

RNA‐directed DNA methylation efficiency depends on trigger and target sequence identity

RNA‐directed DNA methylation (RdDM) in plants has been extensively studied, but the RNA molecules guiding the RdDM machinery to their targets are still to be characterized. It is unclear whether these molecules require full complementarity with their target. In this study, we have generated Nicotiana tabacum (Nt) plants carrying an infectious tomato apical stunt viroid (TASVd) transgene (Nt‐TASVd) and a non‐infectious potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTVd) transgene (Nt‐SB2). The two viroid sequences exhibit 81% sequence identity. Nt‐TASVd and Nt‐SB2 plants were genetically crossed. In the progeny plants (Nt‐SB2/TASVd), deep sequencing of small RNAs (sRNAs) showed that TASVd infection was associated with the accumulation of abundant small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that mapped along the entire TASVd but only partially matched the SB2 transgene. TASVd siRNAs efficiently targeted SB2 RNA for degradation, but no transitivity was detectable. Bisulfite sequencing in the Nt‐SB2/TASVd plants revealed that the TASVd transgene was targeted for dense cis‐RdDM along its entire sequence. In the same plants, the SB2 transgene was targeted for trans‐RdDM. The SB2 methylation pattern, however, was weak and heterogeneous, pointing to a positive correlation between trigger–target sequence identity and RdDM efficiency. Importantly, trans‐RdDM on SB2 was also detected at sites where no homologous siRNAs were detected. Our data indicate that RdDM efficiency depends on the trigger–target sequence identity, and is not restricted to siRNA occupancy. These findings support recent data suggesting that RNAs with sizes longer than 24 nt (>24‐nt RNAs) trigger RdDM.     

The DNA‐ and RNA‐binding protein FACTOR of DNA METHYLATION 1 requires XH domain‐mediated complex formation for its function in RNA‐directed DNA methylation

Studies have identified a sub‐group of SGS3‐LIKE proteins including FDM1–5 and IDN2 as key components of RNA‐directed DNA methylation pathway (RdDM). Although FDM1 and IDN2 bind RNAs with 5′ overhangs, their functions in the RdDM pathway remain to be examined. Here we show that FDM1 interacts with itself and with IDN2. Gel filtration suggests that FDM1 may exist as a homodimer in a heterotetramer complex in vivo. The XH domain of FDM1 mediates the FDM1–FDM1 and FDM1–IDN2 interactions. Deletion of the XH domain disrupts FDM1 complex formation and results in loss‐of‐function of FDM1. These results demonstrate that XH domain‐mediated complex formation of FDM1 is required for its function in RdDM. In addition, FDM1 binds unmethylated but not methylated DNAs through its coiled‐coil domain. RNAs with 5′ overhangs does not compete with DNA for binding by FDM1, indicating that FDM1 may bind DNA and RNA simultaneously. These results provide insight into how FDM1 functions in RdDM.     

Histone modifications in Arabidopsis- high methylation of H3 lysine 9 is dispensable for constitutive heterochromatin

N-terminal modifications of nucleosomal core histones are involved in gene regulation, DNA repair and recombination as well as in chromatin modeling. The degree of individual histone modifications may vary between specific chromatin domains and throughout the cell cycle. We have studied the nuclear patterns of histone H3 and H4 acetylation and of H3 methylation in Arabidopsis. A replication-linked increase of acetylation only occurred at H4 lysine 16 (not for lysines 5 and 12) and at H3 lysine 18. The last was not observed in other plants. Strong methylation at H3 lysine 4 was restricted to euchromatin, while strong methylation at H3 lysine 9 occurred preferentially in heterochromatic chromocenters of Arabidopsis nuclei. Chromocenter appearance, DNA methylation and histone modification patterns were similar in nuclei of wild-type and kryptonite mutant (which lacks H3 lysine 9-specific histone methyltransferase), except that methylation at H3 lysine 9 in heterochromatic chromocenters was reduced to the same low level as in euchromatin. Thus, a high level of H3methylK9 is apparently not necessary to maintain chromocenter structure and does not prevent methylation of H3 lysine 4 within Arabidopsis chromocenters.     

Maternal components of RNA‐directed DNA methylation are required for seed development in Brassica rapa

Small RNAs trigger repressive DNA methylation at thousands of transposable elements in a process called RNA‐directed DNA methylation (RdDM). The molecular mechanism of RdDM is well characterized in Arabidopsis, yet the biological function remains unclear, as loss of RdDM in Arabidopsis causes no overt defects, even after generations of inbreeding. It is known that 24 nucleotide Pol IV‐dependent siRNAs, the hallmark of RdDM, are abundant in flowers and developing seeds, indicating that RdDM might be important during reproduction. Here we show that, unlike Arabidopsis, mutations in the Pol IV‐dependent small RNA pathway cause severe and specific reproductive defects in Brassica rapa. High rates of abortion occur when seeds have RdDM mutant mothers, but not when they have mutant fathers. Although abortion occurs after fertilization, RdDM function is required in maternal somatic tissue, not in the female gametophyte or the developing zygote, suggesting that siRNAs from the maternal soma might function in filial tissues. We propose that recently outbreeding species such as B. rapa are key to understanding the role of RdDM during plant reproduction.     

The HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1‐containing complex provides H3K9me1 for Suv39‐mediated K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin

Trimethylation of lysine 9 in histone H3 (H3K9me3) enrichment is a characteristic of pericentric heterochromatin. The hypothesis of a stepwise mechanism to establish and maintain this mark during DNA replication suggests that newly synthesized histone H3 goes through an intermediate methylation state to become a substrate for the histone methyltransferase Suppressor of variegation 39 (Suv39H1/H2). How this intermediate methylation state is achieved and how it is targeted to the correct place at the right time is not yet known. Here, we show that the histone H3K9 methyltransferase SetDB1 associates with the specific heterochromatin protein 1α (HP1α)–chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF1) chaperone complex. This complex monomethylates K9 on non‐nucleosomal histone H3. Therefore, the heterochromatic HP1α–CAF1–SetDB1 complex probably provides H3K9me1 for subsequent trimethylation by Suv39H1/H2 in pericentric regions. The connection of CAF1 with DNA replication, HP1α with heterochromatin formation and SetDB1 for H3K9me1 suggests a highly coordinated mechanism to ensure the propagation of H3K9me3 in pericentric heterochromatin during DNA replication.     

Role of DNA methylation and histone modifications in structural maintenance of heterochromatin domains (chromocenters)

Effects of DNA methylation inhibitor; 5-azacytidine (5-aza-C); and histone acetylation inhibitor, trichostatine A (TSA), on the structure of pericentric heterochromatin of L929 mouse cells have been studied. 5-aza-C treatment for 48 h resulted in the transformation of ovoid chromocenters into elongated structures in 85% of cells. Hypotonic treatment of these cells reveals tandemly arranged DAPI-positive globules that are well distinguishable by light microscopy. Similar globular units can be observed in hypotonic-treated control cells. TSA treatment for 48 h causes dramatic decrease in HP1α content in cells. In 25% of treated cells chromocenters became highly decondensed and can not be reliably detected by light and electron microscopy. 85% cells demonstrate globular chromocenters with low HP1α content. Hypotonic treatment induces transformation of compact chromocenters into ring-like structures that can be either single or clustered. Rings are formed by uniform fiber in which no globular subunits are detected. The data obtained are discussed concerning several mechanisms of heterochromatin structure maintenance and the role of epigenetic factors.     

Agglomerates of aberrant DNA methylation are associated with toxicant-induced malignant transformation

Epigenetic dysfunction is a known contributor in carcinogenesis, and is emerging as a mechanism involved in toxicant-induced malignant transformation for environmental carcinogens such as arsenicals or cadmium. In addition to aberrant DNA methylation of single genes, another manifestation of epigenetic dysfunction in cancer is agglomerative DNA methylation, which can participate in long-range epigenetic silencing that targets many neighboring genes and has been shown to occur in several types of clinical cancers. Using in vitro model systems of toxicant-induced malignant transformation, we found hundreds of aberrant DNA methylation events that emerge during malignant transformation, some of which occur in an agglomerative fashion. In an arsenite-transformed prostate epithelial cell line, the protocadherin (PCDH), HOXC and HOXD gene family clusters are targeted for agglomerative DNA methylation. The agglomerative DNA methylation changes induced by arsenicals appear to be common and clinically relevant events, since they occur in other human cancer cell lines and models of malignant transformation, as well as clinical cancer specimens. Aberrant DNA methylation in general occurred more often within histone H3 lysine-27 trimethylation stem cell domains. We found a striking association between enrichment of histone H3 lysine-9 trimethylation stem cell domains and toxicant-induced agglomerative DNA methylation, suggesting these epigenetic modifications may become aberrantly linked during malignant transformation. In summary, we found an association between toxicant-induced malignant transformation and agglomerative DNA methylation, which lends further support to the hypothesis that epigenetic dysfunction plays an important role in toxicant-induced malignant transformation.     

Agglomerates of aberrant DNA methylation are associated with toxicant-induced malignant transformation

Epigenetic dysfunction is a known contributor in carcinogenesis, and is emerging as a mechanism involved in toxicant-induced malignant transformation for environmental carcinogens such as arsenicals or cadmium. In addition to aberrant DNA methylation of single genes, another manifestation of epigenetic dysfunction in cancer is agglomerative DNA methylation, which can participate in long-range epigenetic silencing that targets many neighboring genes and has been shown to occur in several types of clinical cancers. Using in vitro model systems of toxicant-induced malignant transformation, we found hundreds of aberrant DNA methylation events that emerge during malignant transformation, some of which occur in an agglomerative fashion. In an arsenite-transformed prostate epithelial cell line, the protocadherin (PCDH), HOXC and HOXD gene family clusters are targeted for agglomerative DNA methylation. The agglomerative DNA methylation changes induced by arsenicals appear to be common and clinically relevant events, since they occur in other human cancer cell lines and models of malignant transformation, as well as clinical cancer specimens. Aberrant DNA methylation in general occurred more often within histone H3 lysine-27 trimethylation stem cell domains. We found a striking association between enrichment of histone H3 lysine-9 trimethylation stem cell domains and toxicant-induced agglomerative DNA methylation, suggesting these epigenetic modifications may become aberrantly linked during malignant transformation. In summary, we found an association between toxicant-induced malignant transformation and agglomerative DNA methylation, which lends further support to the hypothesis that epigenetic dysfunction plays an important role in toxicant-induced malignant transformation.