A GDF5 Point Mutation Strikes Twice - Causing BDA1 and SYNS2

Growth and Differentiation Factor 5 (GDF5) is a secreted growth factor that belongs to the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) family and plays a pivotal role during limb development. GDF5 is a susceptibility gene for osteoarthritis (OA) and mutations in GDF5 are associated with a wide variety of skeletal malformations ranging from complex syndromes such as acromesomelic chondrodysplasias to isolated forms of brachydactylies or multiple synostoses syndrome 2 (SYNS2). Here, we report on a family with an autosomal dominant inherited combination of SYNS2 and additional brachydactyly type A1 (BDA1) caused by a single point mutation in GDF5 (p.W414R). Functional studies, including chondrogenesis assays with primary mesenchymal cells, luciferase reporter gene assays and Surface Plasmon Resonance analysis, of the GDF5^W414R variant in comparison to other GDF5 mutations associated with isolated BDA1 (p.R399C) or SYNS2 (p.E491K) revealed a dual pathomechanism characterized by a gain- and loss-of-function at the same time. On the one hand insensitivity to the main GDF5 antagonist NOGGIN (NOG) leads to a GDF5 gain of function and subsequent SYNS2 phenotype. Whereas on the other hand, a reduced signaling activity, specifically via the BMP receptor type IA (BMPR1A), is likely responsible for the BDA1 phenotype. These results demonstrate that one mutation in the overlapping interface of antagonist and receptor binding site in GDF5 can lead to a GDF5 variant with pathophysiological relevance for both, BDA1 and SYNS2 development. Consequently, our study assembles another part of the molecular puzzle of how loss and gain of function mutations in GDF5 affect bone development in hands and feet resulting in specific types of brachydactyly and SYNS2. These novel insights into the biology of GDF5 might also provide further clues on the pathophysiology of OA.     

Study of the interactions between a proline‐rich protein and a flavan‐3‐ol by NMR: Residual structures in the natively unfolded protein provides anchorage points for the ligands

Astringency is one of the major organoleptic properties of food and beverages that are made from plants, such as tea, chocolate, beer, or red wine. This sensation is thought to be due to interactions between tannins and salivary proline‐rich proteins, which are natively unfolded proteins. A human salivary proline‐rich protein, namely IB‐5, was produced by the recombinant method. Its interactions with a model tannin, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), the major flavan‐3‐ol in green tea, were studied here. Circular dichroism experiments showed that IB‐5 presents residual structures (PPII helices) when the ionic strength is close to that in saliva. In the presence of these residual structures, IB‐5 undergoes an increase in structural content upon binding to EGCG. NMR data corroborated the presence of preformed structural elements within the protein prior to binding and a partial assignment was proposed, showing partial structuration. TOCSY experiments showed that amino acids that are involved in PPII helices are more likely to interact with EGCG than those in random coil regions, as if they were anchorage points for the ligand. The signal from IB‐5 in the DOSY NMR spectrum revealed an increase in polydispersity upon addition of EGCG while the mean hydrodynamic radius remained unchanged. This strongly suggests the formation of IB‐5/EGCG aggregates. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 91: 745–756, 2009. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com     

Structural basis for decreased induction of class IB PI3‐kinases expression by MIF inhibitors

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a master regulator of proinflammatory cytokines and plays pathological roles when not properly regulated in rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, atherosclerosis, asthma and cancer. Unlike canonical cytokines, MIF has vestigial keto‐enol tautomerase activity. Most of the current MIF inhibitors were screened for the inhibition of this enzymatic activity. However, only some of the enzymatic inhibitors inhibit receptor‐mediated biological functions of MIF, such as cell recruitment, through an unknown molecular mechanism. The goal of this study was to understand the molecular basis underlying the pharmacological inhibition of biological functions of MIF. Here, we demonstrate how the structural changes caused upon inhibitor binding translate into the alteration of MIF‐induced downstream signalling. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor activates phosphoinositide 3‐kinases (PI3Ks) that play a pivotal role in immune cell recruitment in health and disease. There are several different PI3K isoforms, but little is known about how they respond to MIF. We demonstrate that MIF up‐regulates the expression of Class IB PI3Ks in leucocytes. We also demonstrate that MIF tautomerase active site inhibitors down‐regulate the expression of Class IB PI3Ks as well as leucocyte recruitment in vitro and in vivo. Finally, based on our MIF:inhibitor complex crystal structures, we hypothesize that the reduction in Class IB PI3K expression occurs because of the displacement of Pro1 towards the second loop of MIF upon inhibitor binding, which results in increased flexibility of the loop 2 and sub‐optimal MIF binding to its receptors. These results will provide molecular insights for fine‐tuning the biological functions of MIF.     

Allosteric HIV‐1 integrase inhibitors promote aberrant protein multimerization by directly mediating inter‐subunit interactions: Structural and thermodynamic modeling studies

Allosteric HIV‐1 integrase (IN) inhibitors (ALLINIs) bind at the dimer interface of the IN catalytic core domain (CCD), and potently inhibit HIV‐1 by promoting aberrant, higher‐order IN multimerization. Little is known about the structural organization of the inhibitor‐induced IN multimers and important questions regarding how ALLINIs promote aberrant IN multimerization remain to be answered. On the basis of physical chemistry principles and from our analysis of experimental information, we propose that inhibitor‐induced multimerization is mediated by ALLINIs directly promoting inter‐subunit interactions between the CCD dimer and a C‐terminal domain (CTD) of another IN dimer. Guided by this hypothesis, we have built atomic models of inter‐subunit interfaces in IN multimers by incorporating information from hydrogen‐deuterium exchange (HDX) measurements to drive protein‐protein docking. We have also developed a novel free energy simulation method to estimate the effects of ALLINI binding on the association of the CCD and CTD. Using this structural and thermodynamic modeling approach, we show that multimer inter‐subunit interface models can account for several experimental observations about ALLINI‐induced multimerization, including large differences in the potencies of various ALLINIs, the mechanisms of resistance mutations, and the crucial role of solvent exposed R‐groups in the high potency of certain ALLINIs. Our study predicts that CTD residues Tyr226, Trp235 and Lys266 are involved in the aberrant multimer interfaces. The key finding of the study is that it suggests the possibility of ALLINIs facilitating inter‐subunit interactions between an external CTD and the CCD‐CCD dimer interface.     

Coevolutionary constraints in the sequence‐space of macromolecular complexes reflect their self‐assembly pathways

Is the order in which biomolecular subunits self‐assemble into functional macromolecular complexes imprinted in their sequence‐space? Here, we demonstrate that the temporal order of macromolecular complex self‐assembly can be efficiently captured using the landscape of residue‐level coevolutionary constraints. This predictive power of coevolutionary constraints is irrespective of the structural, functional, and phylogenetic classification of the complex and of the stoichiometry and quaternary arrangement of the constituent monomers. Combining this result with a number of structural attributes estimated from the crystal structure data, we find indications that stronger coevolutionary constraints at interfaces formed early in the assembly hierarchy probably promotes coordinated fixation of mutations that leads to high‐affinity binding with higher surface area, increased surface complementarity and elevated number of molecular contacts, compared to those that form late in the assembly. Proteins 2017; 85:1183–1189. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15) suppresses in vitro angiogenesis through a novel interaction with connective tissue growth factor (CCN2)

Growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15) and the CCN family member, connective tissue growth factor (CCN2), are associated with cardiac disease, inflammation, and cancer. The precise role and signaling mechanism for these factors in normal and diseased tissues remains elusive. Here we demonstrate an interaction between GDF‐15 and CCN2 using yeast two‐hybrid assays and have mapped the domain of interaction to the von Willebrand factor type C domain of CCN2. Biochemical pull down assays using secreted GDF‐15 and His‐tagged CCN2 produced in PC‐3 prostate cancer cells confirmed a direct interaction between these proteins. To investigate the functional consequences of this interaction, in vitro angiogenesis assays were performed. We demonstrate that GDF‐15 blocks CCN2‐mediated tube formation in human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC) cells. To examine the molecular mechanism whereby GDF‐15 inhibits CCN2‐mediated angiogenesis, activation of α_Vβ₃ integrins and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) was examined. CCN2‐mediated FAK activation was inhibited by GDF‐15 and was accompanied by a decrease in α_Vβ₃ integrin clustering in HUVEC cells. These results demonstrate, for the first time, a novel signaling pathway for GDF‐15 through interaction with the matricellular signaling molecule CCN2. Furthermore, antagonism of CCN2 mediated angiogenesis by GDF‐15 may provide insight into the functional role of GDF‐15 in disease states. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 1424–1433, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

ALS/FTD‐associated FUS activates GSK‐3β to disrupt the VAPB–PTPIP51 interaction and ER–mitochondria associations

Defective FUS metabolism is strongly associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia (ALS/FTD), but the mechanisms linking FUS to disease are not properly understood. However, many of the functions disrupted in ALS/FTD are regulated by signalling between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria. This signalling is facilitated by close physical associations between the two organelles that are mediated by binding of the integral ER protein VAPB to the outer mitochondrial membrane protein PTPIP51, which act as molecular scaffolds to tether the two organelles. Here, we show that FUS disrupts the VAPB–PTPIP51 interaction and ER–mitochondria associations. These disruptions are accompanied by perturbation of Ca²⁺ uptake by mitochondria following its release from ER stores, which is a physiological read‐out of ER–mitochondria contacts. We also demonstrate that mitochondrial ATP production is impaired in FUS‐expressing cells; mitochondrial ATP production is linked to Ca²⁺ levels. Finally, we demonstrate that the FUS‐induced reductions to ER–mitochondria associations and are linked to activation of glycogen synthase kinase‐3β (GSK‐3β), a kinase already strongly associated with ALS/FTD.     

The interaction between uPAR and vitronectin triggers ligand‐independent adhesion signalling by integrins

The urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a non‐integrin vitronectin (VN) cell adhesion receptor linked to the plasma membrane by a glycolipid anchor. Through structure–function analyses of uPAR, VN and integrins, we document that uPAR‐mediated cell adhesion to VN triggers a novel type of integrin signalling that is independent of integrin–matrix engagement. The signalling is fully active on VN mutants deficient in integrin binding site and is also efficiently transduced by integrins deficient in ligand binding. Although integrin ligation is dispensable, signalling is crucially dependent upon an active conformation of the integrin and its association with intracellular adaptors such as talin. This non‐canonical integrin signalling is not restricted to uPAR as it poses no structural constraints to the receptor mediating cell attachment. In contrast to canonical integrin signalling, where integrins form direct mechanical links between the ECM and the cytoskeleton, the molecular mechanism enabling the crosstalk between non‐integrin adhesion receptors and integrins is dependent upon membrane tension. This suggests that for this type of signalling, the membrane represents a critical component of the molecular clutch.     

The GDF‐5 mutant M1673 exerts robust anabolic and anti‐catabolic effects in chondrocytes

The growth and differentiation factor 5 (GDF‐5) is known to play a key role in cartilage morphogenesis and homeostasis, and a single‐nucleotide polymorphism in its promoter sequence was found to be associated with osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, GDF‐5 was shown to promote extracellular matrix (ECM) production in healthy chondrocytes, to stimulate chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and to protect against OA progression in vivo. Therefore, GDF‐5 appears to be a promising treatment for osteoarthritis. However, GDF‐5 also promotes osteogenesis and hypertrophy, limiting its therapeutic utility. To circumvent this, a GDF‐5 mutant with lower hypertrophic and osteogenic properties was engineered: M1673. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of GDF‐5 and M1673 on primary porcine and human OA chondrocytes. We found that both GDF‐5 and M1673 can robustly stimulate ECM accumulation, type II collagen and aggrecan expression in porcine and human OA chondrocytes in 3D culture. In addition, both molecules also down‐regulated MMP13 and ADAMTS5 expression. These results suggest that M1673 retained the anabolic and anti‐catabolic effects of GDF‐5 on chondrocytes and is an alternative to GDF‐5 for osteoarthritis.     

Different combinations of atomic interactions predict protein‐small molecule and protein‐DNA/RNA affinities with similar accuracy

Interactions between proteins and other molecules play essential roles in all biological processes. Although it is widely held that a protein's ligand specificity is determined primarily by its three‐dimensional structure, the general principles by which structure determines ligand binding remain poorly understood. Here we use statistical analyses of a large number of protein?ligand complexes with associated binding‐affinity measurements to quantitatively characterize how combinations of atomic interactions contribute to ligand affinity. We find that there are significant differences in how atomic interactions determine ligand affinity for proteins that bind small chemical ligands, those that bind DNA/RNA and those that interact with other proteins. Although protein‐small molecule and protein‐DNA/RNA binding affinities can be accurately predicted from structural data, models predicting one type of interaction perform poorly on the others. Additionally, the particular combinations of atomic interactions required to predict binding affinity differed between small‐molecule and DNA/RNA data sets, consistent with the conclusion that the structural bases determining ligand affinity differ among interaction types. In contrast to what we observed for small‐molecule and DNA/RNA interactions, no statistical models were capable of predicting protein?protein affinity with >60% correlation. We demonstrate the potential usefulness of protein‐DNA/RNA binding prediction as a possible tool for high‐throughput virtual screening to guide laboratory investigations, suggesting that quantitative characterization of diverse molecular interactions may have practical applications as well as fundamentally advancing our understanding of how molecular structure translates into function. Proteins 2015; 83:2100–2114. © 2015 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Molecular Analysis of Two Novel Missense Mutations in the GDF5 Proregion That Reduce Protein Activity and Are Associated with Brachydactyly Type C

Growth and differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) plays a central role in bone and cartilage development by regulating the proliferation and differentiation of chondrogenic tissue. GDF5 is synthesized as a preproprotein. The biological function of the proregion comprising 354 residues is undefined. We identified two families with a heterozygosity for the novel missense mutations p.T201P or p.L263P located in the proregion of GDF5. The patients presented with dominant brachydactyly type C characterized by the shortening of skeletal elements in the distal extremities. Both mutations gave rise to decreased biological activity in in vitro analyses. The variants reduced the GDF5-induced activation of SMAD signaling by the GDF5 receptors BMPR1A and BMPR1B. Ectopic expression in micromass cultures yielded relatively low protein levels of the variants and showed diminished chondrogenic activity as compared to wild-type GDF5. Interestingly, stimulation of micromass cells with recombinant human proGDF5^T201P and proGDF5^L263P revealed their reduced chondrogenic potential compared to the wild-type protein. Limited proteolysis of the mutant recombinant proproteins resulted in a fragment pattern profoundly different from wild-type proGDF5. Modeling of a part of the GDF5 proregion into the known three-dimensional structure of TGFβ1 latency-associated peptide revealed that the homologous positions of both mutations are conserved regions that may be important for the folding of the mature protein or the assembly of dimeric protein complexes. We hypothesize that the missense mutations p.T201P and p.L263P interfere with the protein structure and thereby reduce the amount of fully processed, biologically active GDF5, finally causing the clinical loss of function phenotype.     

Exploring additivity effects of double mutations on the binding affinity of protein‐protein complexes

Additivity in binding affinity of protein‐protein complexes refers to the change in free energy of binding (ΔΔG_bind) for double (or multiple) mutations which is approximately equal to the sum of their corresponding single mutation ΔΔG_bind values. In this study, we have explored the additivity effect of double mutants, which shows a linear relationship between the binding affinity of double and sum of single mutants with a correlation of 0.90. However, the comparison of ΔΔG_bind values showed a mean absolute deviation of 0.86 kcal/mol, and 25.6% of the double mutants show a deviation of more than 1 kcal/mol, which are identified as non‐additive. The additivity effects have been analyzed based on the influence of structural features such as accessible surface area, long range order, binding propensity change, surrounding hydrophobicity, flexibility, atomic contacts between the mutations and distance between the 2 mutations. We found that non‐additive mutations tend to be closer to each other and have more contacts. We have also used machine learning methods to discriminate additive and non‐additive mutations using structure‐based features, which showed the accuracies in the range of 0.77–0.92 for protein‐protein complexes belonging to different functions. Further, we have compared the additivity effects of protein stability along with binding affinity and explored the similarities and differences between them. The results obtained in this study provide insights into the effects of various structural features on binding affinity of double mutants, and will aid the development of accurate methods to predict the binding affinity of double mutants.     

Structural,thermodynamic, and phosphatidylinositol 3‐phosphate binding properties of Phafin2

Phafin2 is a phosphatidylinositol 3‐phosphate (PtdIns(3)P) binding protein involved in the regulation of endosomal cargo trafficking and lysosomal induction of autophagy. Binding of Phafin2 to PtdIns(3)P is mediated by both its PH and FYVE domains. However, there are no studies on the structural basis, conformational stability, and lipid interactions of Phafin2 to better understand how this protein participates in signaling at the surface of endomembrane compartments. Here, we show that human Phafin2 is a moderately elongated monomer of ～28 kDa with an intensity‐average hydrodynamic diameter of ～7 nm. Circular dichroism (CD) analysis indicates that Phafin2 exhibits an α/β structure and predicts ～40% random coil content in the protein. Heteronuclear NMR data indicates that a unique conformation of Phafin2 is present in solution and dispersion of resonances suggests that the protein exhibits random coiled regions, in agreement with the CD data. Phafin2 is stable, displaying a melting temperature of 48.4°C. The folding‐unfolding curves, obtained using urea‐ and guanidine hydrochloride‐mediated denaturation, indicate that Phafin2 undergoes a two‐state native‐to‐denatured transition. Analysis of these transitions shows that the free energy change for urea‐ and guanidine hydrochloride‐induced Phafin2 denaturation in water is ～4 kcal mol^?1. PtdIns(3)P binding to Phafin2 occurs with high affinity, triggering minor conformational changes in the protein. Taken together, these studies represent a platform for establishing the structural basis of Phafin2 molecular interactions and the role of the two potentially redundant PtdIns(3)P‐binding domains of the protein in endomembrane compartments.     

Phosphoinositide 3‐kinases in cell migration

Cell migration is essential for many biological processes in animals and is a complex highly co‐ordinated process that involves cell polarization, actin‐driven protrusion and formation and turnover of cell adhesions. The PI3K (phosphoinositide 3‐kinase) family of lipid kinases regulate cell migration in many different cell types, both through direct binding of proteins to their lipid products and indirectly through crosstalk with other pathways, such as Rho GTPase signalling. Emerging evidence suggests that the involvement of PI3Ks at different stages of migration varies even within one cell type, and is dependent on the combination of external stimuli, as well as on the signalling status of the cell. In addition, it appears that different PI3K isoforms have distinct roles in cell polarization and migration. This review describes how PI3K signalling is regulated by pro‐migratory stimuli, and the diverse ways in which PI3K‐mediated signal transduction contributes to different aspects of cell migration.     

Low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 6 regulates alternative pre‐mRNA splicing

Low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein 6 (LRP6) serves as a Wnt coreceptor. Although Wnt/LRP6 signalling is best known for the β‐catenin‐dependent regulation of target genes in tissue development and homeostasis, emerging evidence demonstrates the biological aspects of LRP6 beyond a Wnt coreceptor. Whether LRP6 modulates tissue development in a Wnt/β‐catenin signalling‐independent manner remains unknown. Using a model of striated muscle development, we observed that LRP6 was almost undetectable in proliferating myoblasts, whereas its expression gradually increased in the nucleus of myodifferentiating cells. During myodifferentiation, LRP6 modulated the muscle‐specific splicing of integrin‐β1D and consequent myotube maturation independently of the β‐catenin‐dependent Wnt signalling. Furthermore, we identified that the carboxy‐terminal serine‐rich region in LRP6 bond to the adenine‐rich sequence within alternative exon D (AED) of integrin‐β1 pre‐mRNA, and therefore, elicited AED inclusion when the spliceosome was recruited to the splice site. The interaction of LRP6 with the adenine‐rich sequence was sufficient to overcome AED exclusion by a splicing repressor, polypyrimidine tract binding protein‐1. Besides the integrin‐β1, deep RNA sequencing in different types of cells revealed that the LRP6‐mediated splicing regulation was widespread. Thus, our findings implicate LRP6 as a potential regulator for alternative pre‐mRNA splicing.     

Altered‐specificity mutants of the HIV Rev arginine‐rich motif‐RRE IIB interaction

Arginine‐rich motifs (ARMs) bind RNA structures with high affinity and specificity, and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exploits ARM‐RNA interactions to regulate its lifecycle. The expression of HIV structural genes relies on recognition between the ARM of its Rev protein and its primary binding site, an internal loop in the viral RNA, the Rev‐response element region IIB (IIB). Many functional variants of the Rev ARM‐IIB interaction have been discovered, yet how easily it can evolve new specificities is poorly explored. A double mutant of Rev ARM, R35G‐N40 V, uses an unknown strategy to recognize IIB. Here, isothermal titration calorimetry and gel shift assays show that the R35G‐N40V‐IIB interaction has high affinity and specificity in vitro and a larger unfavorable entropy change upon binding than that of wild‐type Rev ARM‐IIB. In stark contrast with the critical dependence of wild‐type Rev on Arg35, Arg39, Asn40, and Arg44, mutational profiling shows R35G‐N40V is highly mutable at positions 40 and 44 and dependent on Gly35, Arg38, Arg39, Arg42, and Arg43. Affinity measurements in vitro and reporter assay measurements in vivo are consistent with the wild‐type Rev ARM and R35G‐N40V maintaining their recognition strategies when binding IIB mutants specific to wild‐type Rev ARM and R35G‐N40V, respectively. Some single amino acid mutants of wild‐type Rev ARM and R35G‐N40V have enhanced specificity, recognizing mutant IIBs yet not wild‐type IIB. These results provide another example of viral ARM‐RNA interactions evolving new specificities with few mutations, consistent with neutral theories of evolution.     

The possible roles of B‐cell novel protein‐1 (BCNP1) in cellular signalling pathways and in cancer

B‐cell novel protein‐1 (BCNP1) or Family member of 129C (FAM129C) was identified as a B‐cell‐specific plasma‐membrane protein. Bioinformatics analysis predicted that BCNP1 might be heavily phosphorylated. The BCNP1 protein contains a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, two proline‐rich (PR) regions and a Leucine Zipper (LZ) domain suggesting that it may be involved in protein‐protein interactions. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data sets, we investigated the correlation of alteration of the BCNP1 copy‐number changes and mutations in several cancer types. We also investigated the function of BCNP1 in cellular signalling pathways. We found that BCNP1 is highly altered in some types of cancers and that BCNP1 copy‐number changes and mutations co‐occur with other molecular alteration events for TP53 (tumour protein P53), PIK3CA (Phosphatidylinositol‐4,5‐Bisphosphate 3‐Kinase, Catalytic Subunit Alpha), MAPK1 (mitogen‐activated protein kinase‐1; ERK: extracellular signal regulated kinase), KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) and AKT2 (V‐Akt Murine Thymoma Viral Oncogene Homolog 2). We also found that PI3K (Phoshoinositide 3‐kinase) inhibition and p38 MAPK (p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase) activation leads to reduction in phosphorylation of BCNP1 at serine residues, suggesting that BCNP1 phosphorylation is PI3K and p38MAPK dependent and that it might be involved in cancer. Its degradation depends on a proteasome‐mediated pathway.     

Allosteric activation of exopolysaccharide synthesis through cyclic di‐GMP‐stimulated protein–protein interaction

In many bacterial pathogens, the second messenger c‐di‐GMP stimulates the production of an exopolysaccharide (EPS) matrix to shield bacteria from assaults of the immune system. How c‐di‐GMP induces EPS biogenesis is largely unknown. Here, we show that c‐di‐GMP allosterically activates the synthesis of poly‐β‐1,6‐N‐acetylglucosamine (poly‐GlcNAc), a major extracellular matrix component of Escherichia coli biofilms. C‐di‐GMP binds directly to both PgaC and PgaD, the two inner membrane components of the poly‐GlcNAc synthesis machinery to stimulate their glycosyltransferase activity. We demonstrate that the PgaCD machinery is a novel type c‐di‐GMP receptor, where ligand binding to two proteins stabilizes their interaction and promotes enzyme activity. This is the first example of a c‐di‐GMP‐mediated process that relies on protein–protein interaction. At low c‐di‐GMP concentrations, PgaD fails to interact with PgaC and is rapidly degraded. Thus, when cells experience a c‐di‐GMP trough, PgaD turnover facilitates the irreversible inactivation of the Pga machinery, thereby temporarily uncoupling it from c‐di‐GMP signalling. These data uncover a mechanism of c‐di‐GMP‐mediated EPS control and provide a frame for c‐di‐GMP signalling specificity in pathogenic bacteria.     

Structural insights of Mycobacterium GTPase‐Obg and anti‐sigma‐F factor Usfx interaction

An essential protein for bacterial growth, GTPase‐Obg (Obg), is known to play an unknown but crucial role in stress response as its expression increases in Mycobacterium under stress conditions. It is well reported that Obg interacts with anti‐sigma‐F factor Usfx; however, a detailed analysis and structural characterization of their physical interaction remain undone. In view of above‐mentioned points, this study was conceptualized for performing binding analysis and structural characterization of Obg‐Usfx interaction. The binding studies were performed by surface plasmon resonance, while in silico docking analysis was done to identify crucial residues responsible for Obg‐Usfx interaction. Surface plasmon resonance results clearly suggest that N‐terminal and G domains of Obg mainly contribute to Usfx binding. Also, binding constants display strong affinity that was further evident by intermolecular hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions in the predicted complex. Strong interaction between Obg and Usfx supports the view that Obg plays an important role in stress response, essentially required for Mycobacterium survival. As concluded by various studies that Obg is crucial for Mycobacterium survival under stress, this structural information may help us in designing novel and potential inhibitors against resistant Mycobacterium strains.