Origins of translation: the hypothesis of permanently attached adaptors

A mechanism for prebiotic translation is proposed in which primeval transfer-RNA (adaptors) are assumed to be permanently associated with messenger nucleic acid molecules. Residual 'fossil' evidences are found to be present within the base sequences of contemporary tRNAs, suggesting the existence of inter-primal-tRNA interactions necessary for the mechanism. The structure of proposed primal-tRNA is such that it can not only choose its own amino acid in the absence of aminoacyl synthetase, but can also associate nonspecifically with adjacent primal-tRNA molecules attached to the neighbouring codons. Such associations can give rise, through cooperative binding between message and adaptors to the 'static template surfaces' which can direct translation of nucleotide sequences into those of amino acids. The origins of ribosomes and contemporary genetic code are suggested by this hypothesis. Proposed structures and processes are thermodynamically compatible. The approximate date of occurrence of the proposed system is calculated, which is consistent with the period of occurrence of the earliest organism with ribosomes.     

Quantitative study of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte immunotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

We suggest that tRNA actively participates in the transfer of 3D information from mRNA to peptides - in addition to its well-known, "classical" role of translating the 3-letter RNA codes into the one letter protein code. The tRNA molecule displays a series of thermodynamically favored configurations during translation, a movement which places the codon and coded amino acids in proximity to each other and make physical contact between some amino acids and their codons possible. This specific codon-amino acid interaction of some selected amino acids is necessary for the transfer of spatial information from mRNA to coded proteins, and is known as RNA-assisted protein folding.     

Genetic code development by stop codon takeover

A novel theoretical consideration of the origin and evolution of the genetic code is presented. Code development is viewed from the perspective of simultaneously evolving codons, anticodons and amino acids. Early code structure was determined primarily by thermodynamic stability considerations, requiring simplicity in primordial codes. More advanced coding stages could arise as biological systems became more complex and precise in their replication. To be consistent with these ideas, a model is described in which codons become permanently associated with amino acids only when a codon-anticodon pairing is strong enough to permit rapid translation. Hence all codons are essentially chain-termination or "stop" codons until tRNA adaptors evolve having the ability to bind tightly to them. This view, which draws support from several lines of evidence, differs from the prevalent thinking on code evolution which holds that codons specifying newer amino acids were derived from codons encoding older amino acids.     

Influenza C virus RNA 7 codes for a nonstructural protein.

The complete nucleotide sequence of RNA segment 7 of influenza C/California/78 virus was determined by using cloned cDNA derived from viral RNA. The gene is 934 nucleotides long and possesses a long open reading frame which can code for a protein of 286 amino acids. Hybrid arrest translation experiments with the cloned cDNA fragment and poly(A)-containing RNA isolated from virus-infected cells showed that a 28,500-molecular-weight protein is coded for by RNA 7. Comparison of the proteins induced in the cell-free system and in virus-infected cells with those found in purified virus suggests that the 28,500-molecular-weight protein is a nonstructural protein.     

Physico-chemical constraints connected with the coding properties of the genetic system

New insights on the origin of the genetic code, based on the analysis of the physico-chemical properties of its molecular constituents (RNA and amino acids), are reported in this paper. We point out a symmetry in the genetic code table and show that it can be explained by the nature of the anticodon-codon interaction. The importance of the strength of this interaction is examined and a correlation is found between the free-energy change (DeltaG(0)) of anticodon-codon association and the volume of the corresponding amino acids. This correlation is investigated in conjunction with the well-known one linking the hydrophobicity of the anticodons with that of the amino acids. We show that they can be considerated separately and that the energy vs. volume correlation may be explained by the process implicating the peptide bond formation between two successive amino acids during translation. This interpretation is supported by a statistical pattern of bases (purines or pyrimidines), observed in present coding genes, and by considerations involving the availability of the different kinds of amino acids. Finally, we try to explain the hydrophobicity correlation when reconstructing the events at the time of the so-called "RNA World". The whole of our investigation shows that the genetic code might be sufficiently robust to exist without the participation of pre-existing proteins, and that this robustness is a consequence of the physico-chemical properties of the four bases of the genetic system.     

Neutral adaptation of the genetic code to double-strand coding

Summary We lay new foundations to the hypothesis that the genetic code is adapted to evolutionary retention of information in the antisense strands of natural DNA/RNA sequences. In particular, we show that the genetic code exhibits, beyond the neutral replacement patterns of amino acid substitutions, optimal properties by favoring simultaneous evolution of proteins encoded in DNA/RNA sense-antisense strands. This is borne out in the sense-antisense transformations of the codons of every amino acid which target amino acids physicochemically similar to each other. Moreover, silent mutations in the sense strand generate conservative ones in its antisense counterpart and vice versa. Coevolution of proteins coded by complementary strands is shown to be a definite possibility, a result which does not depend on any physical interaction between the coevolving proteins. Likewise, the degree to which the present genetic code is dedicated to evolutionary sense-antisense tolerance is demonstrated by comparison with many randomized codes. Double-strand coding is quantified from an information-theoretical point of view.     

A model for the development of genetic translation

Several models have been advanced, both in this journal and others, for the development of the genetic code and translation apparatus. Eigen in particular has put forward a detailed model based on the hypercycle. This paper uses some of these previous ideas to develop a new model of the code and translation in which the pairs AU and GC play complementary roles, and in whichtRNAs develop from a molecule withtwo loops which stacks in repetitive patterns without the need for a messenger RNA. Thus a bridge is provided between random, (or autocatalytic) polymerization, and coded translation. In addition, alternative postulates to several of Eigen's ideas are tested by computer simulation.     

RNA–Amino Acid Binding: A Stereochemical Era for the Genetic Code

By combining crystallographic and NMR structural data for RNA-bound amino acids within riboswitches, aptamers, and RNPs, chemical principles governing specific RNA interaction with amino acids can be deduced. Such principles, which we summarize in a “polar profile”, are useful in explaining newly selected specific RNA binding sites for free amino acids bearing varied side chains charged, neutral polar, aliphatic, and aromatic. Such amino acid sites can be queried for parallels to the genetic code. Using recent sequences for 337 independent binding sites directed to 8 amino acids and containing 18,551 nucleotides in all, we show a highly robust connection between amino acids and cognate coding triplets within their RNA binding sites. The apparent probability (P) that cognate triplets around these sites are unrelated to binding sites is ≅5.3 × 10⁻⁴⁵ for codons overall, and P ≅ 2.1 × 10⁻⁴⁶ for cognate anticodons. Therefore, some triplets are unequivocally localized near their present amino acids. Accordingly, there was likely a stereochemical era during evolution of the genetic code, relying on chemical interactions between amino acids and the tertiary structures of RNA binding sites. Use of cognate coding triplets in RNA binding sites is nevertheless sparse, with only 21% of possible triplets appearing. Reasoning from such broad recurrent trends in our results, a majority (approximately 75%) of modern amino acids entered the code in this stereochemical era; nevertheless, a minority (approximately 21%) of modern codons and anticodons were assigned via RNA binding sites. A Direct RNA Template scheme embodying a credible early history for coded peptide synthesis is readily constructed based on these observations.     

Evolution of the Genetic Code by Incorporation of Amino Acids that Improved or Changed Protein Function

Fifty years have passed since the genetic code was deciphered, but how the genetic code came into being has not been satisfactorily addressed. It is now widely accepted that the earliest genetic code did not encode all 20 amino acids found in the universal genetic code as some amino acids have complex biosynthetic pathways and likely were not available from the environment. Therefore, the genetic code evolved as pathways for synthesis of new amino acids became available. One hypothesis proposes that early in the evolution of the genetic code four amino acids—valine, alanine, aspartic acid, and glycine—were coded by GNC codons (N = any base) with the remaining codons being nonsense codons. The other sixteen amino acids were subsequently added to the genetic code by changing nonsense codons into sense codons for these amino acids. Improvement in protein function is presumed to be the driving force behind the evolution of the code, but how improved function was achieved by adding amino acids has not been examined. Based on an analysis of amino acid function in proteins, an evolutionary mechanism for expansion of the genetic code is described in which individual coded amino acids were replaced by new amino acids that used nonsense codons differing by one base change from the sense codons previously used. The improved or altered protein function afforded by the changes in amino acid function provided the selective advantage underlying the expansion of the genetic code. Analysis of amino acid properties and functions explains why amino acids are found in their respective positions in the genetic code.     

The origin of polynucleotide-directed protein synthesis

Summary If protein synthesis evolved in an RNA world it was probably preceded by simpler processes by means of which interaction with amino acids conferred selective advantage on replicating RNA molecules. It is suggested that, at first, the simple attachment of amino acids to the 2′(3′)-termini of RNA templates favored initiation of replication at the end of the template rather than at internal positions. The second stage in the evolution of protein synthesis would probably have been the association of pairs of charged RNA adaptors in such a way as to favor noncoded formation of peptides. Only after this process had become efficient could coded synthesis have begun.     

A speculation on the origin of protein synthesis.

It is suggested that protein sythesis may have begun without even a primitive ribosome if the primitive tRNA could take up two configuration and could bind to the messenger RNA with five base-pairs instead of the present three. This idea would impose base sequence restriction on the early messages and on the early genetic code such that the first four amino acids coded were glycine, serine, aspartic acid and aspargine. A possible mechanism is suggested for the polymerization of the early message.     

Residue-specific Incorporation of Noncanonical Amino Acids into Model Proteins Using an Escherichia coli Cell-free Transcription-translation System

The canonical set of amino acids leads to an exceptionally wide range of protein functionality. Nevertheless, the set of residues still imposes limitations on potential protein applications. The incorporation of noncanonical amino acids can enlarge this scope. There are two complementary approaches for the incorporation of noncanonical amino acids. For site-specific incorporation, in addition to the endogenous canonical translational machineries, an orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase-tRNA pair must be provided that does not interact with the canonical ones. Consequently, a codon that is not assigned to a canonical amino acid, usually a stop codon, is also required. This genetic code expansion enables the incorporation of a noncanonical amino acid at a single, given site within the protein. The here presented work describes residue-specific incorporation where the genetic code is reassigned within the endogenous translational system. The translation machinery accepts the noncanonical amino acid as a surrogate to incorporate it at canonically prescribed locations, i.e., all occurrences of a canonical amino acid in the protein are replaced by the noncanonical one. The incorporation of noncanonical amino acids can change the protein structure, causing considerably modified physical and chemical properties. Noncanonical amino acid analogs often act as cell growth inhibitors for expression hosts since they modify endogenous proteins, limiting in vivo protein production. In vivo incorporation of toxic noncanonical amino acids into proteins remains particularly challenging. Here, a cell-free approach for a complete replacement of L-arginine by the noncanonical amino acid L-canavanine is presented. It circumvents the inherent difficulties of in vivo expression. Additionally, a protocol to prepare target proteins for mass spectral analysis is included. It is shown that L-lysine can be replaced by L-hydroxy-lysine, albeit with lower efficiency. In principle, any noncanonical amino acid analog can be incorporated using the presented method as long as the endogenous in vitro translation system recognizes it.     

Simplification of the genetic code: restricted diversity of genetically encoded amino acids

At earlier stages in the evolution of the universal genetic code, fewer than 20 amino acids were considered to be used. Although this notion is supported by a wide range of data, the actual existence and function of the genetic codes with a limited set of canonical amino acids have not been addressed experimentally, in contrast to the successful development of the expanded codes. Here, we constructed artificial genetic codes involving a reduced alphabet. In one of the codes, a tRNA^Ala variant with the Trp anticodon reassigns alanine to an unassigned UGG codon in the Escherichia coli S30 cell-free translation system lacking tryptophan. We confirmed that the efficiency and accuracy of protein synthesis by this Trp-lacking code were comparable to those by the universal genetic code, by an amino acid composition analysis, green fluorescent protein fluorescence measurements and the crystal structure determination. We also showed that another code, in which UGU/UGC codons are assigned to Ser, synthesizes an active enzyme. This method will provide not only new insights into primordial genetic codes, but also an essential protein engineering tool for the assessment of the early stages of protein evolution and for the improvement of pharmaceuticals.     

The Plausibility of RNA-Templated Peptides: Simultaneous RNA Affinity for Adjacent Peptide Side Chains

According to the RNA world hypothesis, coded peptide synthesis (translation) must have been first catalyzed by RNAs. Here, we show that small RNA sequences can simultaneously bind the dissimilar amino acids His and Phe in peptide linkage. We used in vitro counterselection/selection to isolate a pool of RNAs that bind the dipeptide NH(2)-His-Phe-COOH with K (D) ranging from 36 to 480 μM. These sites contact both side chains, usually including the protonated imidazole of His, but bind-free L: -His and L: -Phe with much lower, sometimes undetectable, affinities. The most frequent His-Phe sites do not usually contain previously isolated sites for individual amino acids, and are only ≈35 % larger than previously known separate His and Phe sites. Nonetheless, His-Phe sites appear enriched in His anticodons, as previous L: -His sites also were. Accordingly, these data add to existing experimental evidence for a stereochemical genetic code. In these peptide sites, bound amino acids approach each other to a proximity that allows a covalent peptide linkage. Isolation of several RNAs embracing two amino acids with a linking peptide bond supports the idea that a direct-RNA-template could encode primordial peptides, though crucial experiments remain.     

On the origin of the translation system and the genetic code in the RNA world by means of natural selection, exaptation, and subfunctionalization

Background  

The origin of the translation system is, arguably, the central and the hardest problem in the study of the origin of life, and one of the hardest in all evolutionary biology. The problem has a clear catch-22 aspect: high translation fidelity hardly can be achieved without a complex, highly evolved set of RNAs and proteins but an elaborate protein machinery could not evolve without an accurate translation system. The origin of the genetic code and whether it evolved on the basis of a stereochemical correspondence between amino acids and their cognate codons (or anticodons), through selectional optimization of the code vocabulary, as a "frozen accident" or via a combination of all these routes is another wide open problem despite extensive theoretical and experimental studies. Here we combine the results of comparative genomics of translation system components, data on interaction of amino acids with their cognate codons and anticodons, and data on catalytic activities of ribozymes to develop conceptual models for the origins of the translation system and the genetic code.     

A speculation on the origin of protein synthesis

It is suggested that protein synthesis may have begun without even a primitive ribosome if the primitive tRNA could take up two configurations and could bind to the messenger RNA with five base-pairs instead of the present three. This idea would impose base sequence restriction on the early messages and on the early genetic code such that the first four amino acids coded were glycine, serine, aspartic acid and aspargine. A possible mechanism is suggested for the polymerization of the early message.This paper is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Aharon Katzir.     

Origin of the genetic code: A physical-chemical model of primitive codon assignments

Selective compartmentalization of amino acids and nucleotides according to their polarities is proposed as a physical-chemical model for the origin of the genetic code. Assumptions made in this hypothesis are: (1) an oil-slick covered the surface of the primitive ocean, constituents of which formed association colloids or micelles at the water-oil-air interfaces; (2) depending on the polarity of the media, these aggregates possessed hydrophilic and hydrophobic interiors where selective uptake of amino acids and nucleic acid constituents could take place; and 93) condensation and polymerization in the micellar phase were enhanced. According to the chromatographically observed polarities, for example, lysine and uridylate fall into the hydrophilic compartment, and phenylalanine and adenylate are enriched in the hydrophobic environment. These components could eventually be condensed to form a charged adaptor loop with an anticodon which is complementary to the presently valid codon. Only two groups of amino acids, hydrophilic and hydrophobic, were recognized by the primitive translation mechanism. Implications of this hypothesis for the further development of the genetic code is discussed. The catalytic power of micelles have been substantiated by successful synthesis of nucleotides under relatively mild conditions using thiophosphates as high energy phosphates.     

The RNA origin of transfer RNA aminoacylation and beyond

Aminoacylation of tRNA is an essential event in the translation system. Although in the modern system protein enzymes play the sole role in tRNA aminoacylation, in the primitive translation system RNA molecules could have catalysed aminoacylation onto tRNA or tRNA-like molecules. Even though such RNA enzymes so far are not identified from known organisms, in vitro selection has generated such RNA catalysts from a pool of random RNA sequences. Among them, a set of RNA sequences, referred to as flexizymes (Fxs), discovered in our laboratory are able to charge amino acids onto tRNAs. Significantly, Fxs allow us to charge a wide variety of amino acids, including those that are non-proteinogenic, onto tRNAs bearing any desired anticodons, and thus enable us to reprogramme the genetic code at our will. This article summarizes the evolutionary history of Fxs and also the most recent advances in manipulating a translation system by integration with Fxs.     

Origin of translation: The hypothesis of permanently attached adaptors

A mechanism for prebiotic translation is proposed in which primeval transfer-RNA (adaptors) are assumed to be permanently associated with messenger nucleic acid molecules. Residual fossil evidences are found to be present within the base sequences of contemporary tRNAs, suggesting the existence of inter-primal-tRNA interactions necessary for the mechanism. The structure of proposed primal-tRNA is such that it can not only choose its own amino acid in the absence of aminoacyl synthetase, but can also associate nonspecifically with adjacent primal-tRNA molecules attached to the neighbouring codons. Such associations can give rise, through cooperative binding between message and adaptors to the static template surfaces which can direct translation of nucleotide sequences into those of amino acids. The origins of ribosomes and contemporary genetic code are suggested by this hypothesis. Proposed structures and processes are thermodynamically compatible. The approximate date of occurence of the proposed system is calculated, which is consistent with the period of occurence of the earliest organisms with ribosomes.     

A model for the coevolution of the genetic code and the process of protein synthesis: Review and assessment

The contemporary genetic code and the process of protein biosynthesis most assuredly evolved from a simpler code and process. We believe that there was obligatory coevolution of the two and that the earlier code and process must have involved a more direct linkage between the amino acids and the informational macromolecule. We propose that an early form of translating existed in which amino acids were attached directly to the ‘messenger’ RNA along the backbone as 2'OH aminoacyl esters. These esters then condensed with each other on the RNA backbone yielding a peptide covalently attached to the RNA, without the use of tRNAs and ribosomes. This presentation is concerned with experimental data which indicate that such a simple translation system is possible and must have involved the following steps: (1) formation of the aminoacyl adenylate anhydride, (2) transfer of the amino acid from the adenylate to imidazole, (3) transfer of the amino acid from imidazole to 2'OH groups along the backbone of RNAs (4) condensation of the amino acids to yield peptides. Steps (1)–(3) have been confirmed in chemical systems. Our preliminary evidence indicates step (4) is also possible. The aminoacylation of polyribonucleotides and the subsequent formation of peptides is a dynamic and experimentally accessible system for studying genetic coding specifities and our present studies are now concentrated on step (4), looking for such specifities.