Plk3 Interacts with and Specifically Phosphorylates VRK1 in Ser342, a Downstream Target in a Pathway That Induces Golgi Fragmentation

Golgi fragmentation is a process that is necessary to allow its redistribution into daughter cells during mitosis, a process controlled by serine-threonine kinases. This Golgi fragmentation is activated by MEK1 and Plk3. Plk3 is a kinase that is a downstream target in the Golgi fragmentation pathway induced by MEK1 or by nocodazole. In this work, we have identified that Plk3 and VRK1 are two consecutive steps in this signaling pathway. Plk3 interacts with VRK1, forming a stable complex detected by reciprocal immunoprecipitations and pull-down assays; VRK1 colocalizes with giantin in the Golgi apparatus, as Plk3 also does, forming clearly detectable granules. VRK1 does not phosphorylate Plk3, but Plk3 phosphorylates the C-terminal region of VRK1 in Ser342. VRK1 with substitutions in S342 is catalytically active but blocks Golgi fragmentation, indicating that its specific phosphorylation is necessary for this process. The induction of Golgi fragmentation by MEK1 and Plk3 can be inhibited by kinase-dead VRK1, the knockdown of VRK1 by siVRK1, kinase-dead Plk3, or PD98059, a MEK1 inhibitor. The Plk3-VRK1 kinase module might represent two consecutive steps of a signaling cascade that participates in the regulation of Golgi fragmentation.The Golgi apparatus in mammalian cells is formed by cistern stacks, tubules, and small vesicles, which undergo extensive and sequential fragmentation in mitosis (33). The reorganization of the Golgi apparatus, involving fragmentation, dispersal, and reassembly, is tightly regulated during mitosis (1, 27, 30), and reversible phosphorylation plays a critical role (1, 21), although the components and their sequential organization in the context of the initiation or execution of the signal required for Golgi fragmentation are only partially known.Many signaling pathways are composed of consecutive kinases. Characterization of new signaling pathways requires the identification of their components, the connections between them, and the order in which they are organized. Human VRK1 is a novel serine-threonine kinase that phosphorylates several proteins implicated in cellular responses to stress and DNA damage, such as p53 (5, 20, 40), c-Jun (31), and ATF2 (32), as well as proteins needed for nuclear envelope assembly required at the end of mitosis, such as Baf (25). In addition, VRK1 kinase activity is inhibited by interaction with RanGDP, and this inhibition is relieved by RanGTP, suggesting an asymmetric distribution of its activity within the nucleus and in mitosis (29). These properties suggest that the VRK1 gene plays a role in the regulation of cell cycle initiation and/or progression, consistent with its requirement for entry into the cell cycle, where it behaves as an immediate-early response gene like c-MYC and FOS (36). The loss of VRK1 by use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) induces an early G₁ block, before cyclin D1 expression (36), which is accompanied by a reduction in the phospho-retinoblastoma level and an accumulation of cycle inhibitors, such as p27 (36), resulting in a stop in cell cycle progression (36, 40).Several kinases are implicated in the control of cell proliferation and in different mitotic checkpoints; among them are the polo-like kinase (Plk) family, which is a group composed of four proteins (14, 39, 46). One of them, Plk3, contributes as a mediator of DNA damage checkpoint responses, since its kinase activity increases after oxidative stress (43) and induction of DNA damage by ionizing radiomimetic drugs (45). Plk3 physically interacts with and phosphorylates p53 in Ser20, and this interaction increases in response to DNA damage and induces either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis (44) so that genetic stability can be maintained by the prevention of the accumulation of genetic damage. Furthermore, Plk3 interacts with Chk2 (2, 45), an important mediator of DNA damage responses (6, 16), and there is a functional connection between them since Plk3 phosphorylates Chk2 in Ser62 and Ser73, which are necessary for full Chk2 activation by ATM (4). In mitotic cells, Plk3 is localized associated with the spindle poles and mitotic spindles, and deregulated expression of Plk3 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by the perturbation of microtubule integrity (41). In addition, Plk3 expression is induced after mitogenic stimulation, and it is required for mitotic (28) and S-phase (48) entry. Plk3 also regulates Cdc25C (3, 23, 26) and the NF-κB signaling pathway (19). VRK1 phosphorylates p53 in Thr18 (20, 40), a residue phosphorylated in response to taxol, an inhibitor of microtubule polymerization (34).There is a possibility that VRK1 and Plk3 might be connected in some way, since subpopulations of both VRK1 (37) and Plk3 (28) have been detected in the Golgi apparatus near the centrosome, where they colocalize with Golgi markers such as giantin or GM130 (33). Golgi fragmentation can be induced by MEK1 (1, 15), and this signal is partly mediated by Plk3 (28, 42). Moreover, Golgi fragmentation is a required step during mitosis, occurring late in the G₂/M phase of the cell cycle (11), and MEK1 is implicated in the activation of this process (1, 15).The common biological aspects of VRK1 and Plk3 proteins and the association of VRK1 and Plk3 subpopulations in the Golgi apparatus led us to think that there might be a functional connection between these two kinases and thus that they might be components in a common signaling pathway. In this work, we explored the possible connection between VRK1 and Plk3 and determined if they were functionally related in a biological process, Golgi fragmentation, in which one of them, Plk3, is already known to participate. This work demonstrates that Plk3 and VRK1 are consecutive components in the signaling pathway that induces Golgi fragmentation in mitosis.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Polo-Like Kinase 1 Is Involved in Hepatitis C Virus Replication by Hyperphosphorylating NS5A

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication involves many viral and host factors. Here, we employed a lentivirus-based RNA interference (RNAi) screening approach to search for possible cellular factors. By using a kinase-phosphatase RNAi library and an HCV replicon reporter system, we identified a serine-threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), as a potential host factor regulating HCV replication. Knockdown of Plk1 reduced both HCV RNA replication and nonstructural (NS) protein production in both HCV replicon cells and HCV-infected cells while it did not significantly affect host cellular growth or cell cycle. Overexpression of Plk1 in the knockdown cells rescued HCV replication. Interestingly, the ratio between the hyperphosphorylated form (p58) and the basal phosphorylated form (p56) of NS5A was lower in the Plk1 knockdown cells and Plk1 kinase inhibitor-treated cells than in the control groups. Further studies showed that Plk1 could be immunoprecipitated together with NS5A. Both proteins partially colocalized in the perinuclear region. Furthermore, Plk1 could phosphorylate NS5A to both the p58 and p56 forms in an in vitro assay system; the phosphorylation efficiency was comparable to that of the reported casein kinase. Taken together, this study shows that Plk1 is an NS5A phosphokinase and thereby indirectly regulates HCV RNA replication. Because of the differential effects of Plk1 on HCV replication and host cell growth, Plk1 could potentially serve as a target for anti-HCV therapy.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the major causative agent of non-A/non-B hepatitis (26). More than 170 million people, or 3% of the population in the world, are infected with HCV (29). It establishes chronic infection in at least 85% of infected individuals and is associated with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Current treatment, which combines polyethylene glycol-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin, is ineffective in 22% of patients with non-genotype 1 and in 45% of patients with genotype 1 HCV (1, 16, 23, 55). Therefore, identification of new targets for HCV therapy is an important issue, and cellular genes involved in the HCV life cycle may serve as good candidates.HCV is a positive-strand RNA virus and the only known member of Hepacivirus genus in the family Flaviviridae. Its genome has a length of about 9,600 nucleotides coding for a single polyprotein. The long polyprotein is further processed into at least 10 different products, including four structural proteins (core, E1, E2, and p7) and six nonstructural (NS) proteins (NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B). Nonstructural proteins NS3-NS5B are components of the membrane-associated HCV replication complex (8, 13, 36, 45). NS3 is a bifunctional protein containing an N-terminal protease domain and a C-terminal helicase/NTPase domain, and NS4A serves as a cofactor for NS3 protease. NS4B protein is known to induce intracellular membrane changes that probably serve as the site for viral RNA replication (8). NS5A is required for RNA replication, but little is known about its function. NS5B is the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (reviewed in reference 47).NS5A is phosphorylated on multiple serine and threonine residues and exists in basal phosphorylated (p56) and hyperphosphorylated (p58) forms (49). Increasing evidence suggests that the regulation of NS5A phosphorylation is important for HCV RNA replication. Adaptive mutations or kinase inhibitors, which reduce NS5A hyperphosphorylation, increased the replication of an HCV replicon in cell culture (HCVcc) systems (2, 4, 38). However, when an adaptive replicon with reduced p58 was further treated with the same kinase inhibitor or introduced with a second adaptive mutation, RNA replication was completely blocked (32, 38). Furthermore, the mutations that reduce NS5A hyperphosphorylation and promote RNA replication in cell culture, paradoxically, prevented productive replication in the chimpanzee model (6). These results imply that the tight control of the p58/p56 ratio is important for HCV replication. The detailed mechanism is still not clear, but a clue was provided by the finding of differential association of NS5A phospho-forms with the host vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein A (VAP-A) protein, which is an essential molecule for HCV replicase (9, 12). On the other hand, NS5A phosphorylation was recently found to regulate the production of infectious virus (34, 50). Alanine substitutions in the C-terminal domain III of NS5A impaired NS5A phosphorylation, leading to a decrease in NS5A-core protein interaction, disturbance of subcellular localization of NS5A, and disruption of virion production (3, 34, 50). In summary, phosphorylation on NS5A is not only important for HCV RNA replication but also critical for infectious virus production.Since the phosphorylation state of NS5A is correlated with HCV RNA replication and virion production, cellular kinases responsible for NS5A phosphorylation may serve as good candidates for drug targets. Several kinases have been shown to target NS5A in vitro, including casein kinase I (CKI), CKII, MEK1, MKK6, MKK7, AKT, and p70S6K (7, 24). Among these proteins, CKI and CKII are better characterized for NS5A phosphorylation. CKIα has been identified as the target of kinase inhibitors which decrease the hyperphosphorylation of NS5A and was further confirmed as a direct kinase of NS5A (41, 42). CKI requires prephosphorylation of residues near the predicted phosphorylation site in NS5A for effective modification, suggesting that other kinases are also involved in this process (42). CKII has been shown to bind to the C-terminal domain of NS5A and phosphorylate NS5A in vitro (24). Inhibition of CKII with chemical compounds or small interfering RNA (siRNA) did not significantly affect HCV RNA replication but severely disrupted virus production (50).In this study, using lentivirus-based RNA interference (RNAi) screening, we identified a serine/threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), which is involved in HCV replication. Expression of short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting Plk1 decreased HCV replication and virus production. Moreover, silencing of Plk1 decreased the hyperphosphorylated form of NS5A. In cells treated with a Plk1-specific kinase inhibitor, HCV replication and NS5A hyperphosphorylation were significantly reduced, indicating that Plk1 kinase activity is required for this process. Further studies showed that Plk1 was coimmunoprecipitated and partially colocalized with NS5A, suggesting NS5A as a possible substrate for Plk1. Finally, NS5A is hyperphosphorylated by Plk1 in vitro, supporting the proposition that Plk1 regulates HCV replication through hyperphosphorylation of NS5A.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Abrogation of the Postmitotic Checkpoint Contributes to Polyploidization in Human Papillomavirus E7-Expressing Cells

High-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) are considered the major causative agents of cervical carcinoma. The transforming ability of HPV resides in the E6 and E7 oncogenes, yet the pathway to transformation is not well understood. Cells expressing the oncogene E7 from high-risk HPVs have a high incidence of polyploidy, which has been shown to occur as an early event in cervical carcinogenesis and predisposes the cells to aneuploidy. The mechanism through which E7 contributes to polyploidy is not known. It has been hypothesized that E7 induces polyploidy in response to mitotic stress by abrogating the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint. It was also proposed that E7 may stimulate rereplication to induce polyploidy. We have tested these hypotheses by using human epithelial cells in which E7 expression induces a significant amount of polyploidy. We find that E7-expressing cells undergo normal mitoses with an intact spindle assembly checkpoint and that they are able to complete cytokinesis. Our results also exclude DNA rereplication as a major mechanism of polyploidization in E7-expressing cells upon microtubule disruption. Instead, we have shown that while normal cells arrest at the postmitotic checkpoint after adaptation to the spindle assembly checkpoint, E7-expressing cells replicate their DNA and propagate as polyploid cells. Thus, abrogation of the postmitotic checkpoint leads to polyploidy formation in E7-expressing human epithelial cells. Our results suggest that downregulation of pRb is important for E7 to induce polyploidy and abrogation of the postmitotic checkpoint.An important hallmark of human cancers is aneuploidy, the state in which a cell has extra or missing chromosomes (12, 25). Polyploidy is the state in which cells have more than two equal sets of chromosomes and is thought to be an early event in multistep carcinogenesis that can lead to aneuploidy (1, 24), as exemplified in Barrett''s esophagus (11). Polyploidy has recently been shown to occur as an early event in cervical carcinogenesis and to predispose the cells to aneuploidy (26). Other recent studies have shown that tetraploid but not diploid mouse or human cells induce tumor formation in mice (3, 9). These studies highlight the potential importance of polyploidy in carcinogenesis.The cellular mechanisms responsible for this polyploidy formation are as of yet undetermined, but several models have been proposed. First, abrogation of the spindle assembly checkpoint followed by cleavage failure may lead to polyploidy formation (36, 40). A second proposed model is rereplication, a process of multiple rounds of DNA replication without an intervening mitosis. Third, cells that adapt to the mitotic spindle checkpoint halt in a G₁-like state with 4C DNA content. Abrogation of this postmitotic checkpoint allows the cells to replicate their 4C DNA content, leading to polyploidy formation. This has been shown in cells that express the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) E6 oncogene that degrades p53 (21). Finally, cleavage failure, which yields binucleate cells with 4C DNA content, is also a potential mechanism for polyploidy formation (31).The postmitotic checkpoint becomes activated when cells with an intact spindle assembly checkpoint become arrested during mitosis for a prolonged period of time and eventually adapt to the checkpoint, exit mitosis without cleavage, and progress into a G₁-like state with 4C DNA content (19, 22). The cells are prevented from continuing through the cell cycle and replicating their DNA by a proposed p53- and pRb-dependent postmitotic checkpoint (18, 19).High-risk types of HPV (of which HPV-16 is the most prevalent) are commonly associated with lesions that can progress to cervical carcinoma, which is one of the leading causes of cancer death in women worldwide (42). The transforming properties of high-risk HPVs primarily reside in the E6 and E7 oncogenes (reviewed in reference 7). The ability of high-risk HPV E6 and E7 proteins to promote the degradation of p53 and pRb, respectively, has been suggested as a mechanism by which HPV induces cellular transformation (6, 30). Expression of the high-risk HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes in human keratinocytes leads to polyploidy, which is enhanced by DNA damage and by activation of the spindle checkpoint through microtubule disruption (15, 27, 37, 38).Previously, it was thought but not directly shown that high-risk E6 and E7 induce polyploidy in response to microtubule disruption by abrogating the spindle checkpoint and that degradation of the tumor suppressor p53 by E6 is the mechanism by which E6 accomplishes this polyploidy formation (27, 37, 38). Others have proposed that E7 may play a role in stimulating DNA rereplication that occurs prior to mitosis initiation and polyploidy formation (20). Our recent studies demonstrate that E6 does not affect the mitotic spindle checkpoint (21). Instead, E6 abrogates the postmitotic checkpoint to induce polyploidy after microtubule disruption. Interestingly, E6 mutant proteins defective in inducing p53 degradation also induce polyploidy (21). The mechanism by which HPV E7 induces polyploidy remains to be determined. In this study, we investigate these possible mechanisms through which HPV-16 E7 induces polyploidy formation.     

Strategy for Extracting DNA from Clay Soil and Detecting a Specific Target Sequence via Selective Enrichment and Real-Time (Quantitative) PCR Amplification

We present a simple strategy for isolating and accurately enumerating target DNA from high-clay-content soils: desorption with buffers, an optional magnetic capture hybridization step, and quantitation via real-time PCR. With the developed technique, μg quantities of DNA were extracted from mg samples of pure kaolinite and a field clay soil.Isolating and characterizing DNA sequences for use in molecular methods are integral to evaluating microbial community diversity in soil (6, 21, 22, 24, 37). Any isolation protocol should maximize nucleic acid isolation while minimizing copurification of enzymatic inhibitors. Although several methods that focus on extraction of total community DNA from environmental soil and water samples have been published (7, 21, 26, 34), the lack of a standard nucleic acid isolation protocol (32) reflects the difficulty in accomplishing these goals, most likely due to the complex nature of the soil environment.DNA extraction is especially difficult for soils containing clay (3, 5), given the tight binding of DNA strands to clay soil particles (7, 10, 20). Additionally, extracellular DNA binds to and is copurified with soil humic substances (10), which inhibit the activity of enzymes such as restriction endonucleases and DNA polymerase (6, 13, 23). Although clay-bound DNA can be PCR amplified in the absence of inhibitors (1), it is often the case that inhibitors are present in the soil environment, among them bilirubin, bile salts, urobilinogens, and polysaccharides (40). Of these inhibitors, humic substances have been found to be the most recalcitrant (36).A promising technique for isolating specific target sequences from soil particles and enzymatic inhibitors is the magnetic capture hybridization-PCR technique (MCH-PCR) presented by Jacobsen (19) and used to obtain high detection sensitivities (11, 38).We have found no evidence in the published literature of the use of MCH-PCR on soils that have high clay contents and here present a three-step strategy for isolating specific DNA sequences from the most difficult soil environment—clay that contains humic substances—and enumerating a specific target sequence from the crude extract.     

Inactivation and Disassembly of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex during Human Cytomegalovirus Infection Is Associated with Degradation of the APC5 and APC4 Subunits and Does Not Require UL97-Mediated Phosphorylation of Cdh1

Infection of quiescent cells by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) elicits severe cell cycle deregulation, resulting in a G₁/S arrest, which can be partly attributed to the inactivation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). As we previously reported, the premature phosphorylation of its coactivator Cdh1 and/or the dissociation of the core complex can account for the inactivation. We have expanded on these results and further delineated the key components required for disabling the APC during HCMV infection. The viral protein kinase UL97 was hypothesized to phosphorylate Cdh1, and consistent with this, phosphatase assays utilizing a virus with a UL97 deletion mutation (ΔUL97 virus) indicated that Cdh1 is hypophosphorylated at early times in the infection. Mass spectrometry analysis demonstrated that UL97 can phosphorylate Cdh1 in vitro, and the majority of the sites identified correlated with previously characterized cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) consensus sites. Analysis of the APC core complex during ΔUL97 virus infection showed APC dissociation occurring at the same time as during infection with wild-type virus, suggesting that the UL97-mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 is not required for this to occur. Further investigation of the APC subunits showed a proteasome-dependent loss of the APC5 and APC4 subunits that was temporally associated with the disassembly of the APC. Immediate early viral gene expression was not sufficient for the degradation of APC4 and APC5, indicating that a viral early gene product(s), possibly in association with a de novo-synthesized cellular protein(s), is involved.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a highly prevalent β-herpesvirus, can cause serious birth defects and disease in immunocompromised individuals, and it may be associated with cancer and cardiovascular disease (53). Viral gene expression is temporally regulated and is dependent on many cellular factors for a productive infection. Immediate early (IE) genes are expressed by 2 h postinfection (p.i.) and transactivate the early genes required for viral DNA replication. The expression of the late genes, which encode proteins involved in virion maturation and egress, is dependent on viral DNA replication.The virus has adopted different strategies for altering the cellular environment to make it more conducive to productive infection, including the stimulation of host cell DNA replication pathways, cell cycle deregulation and arrest, immune evasion, and inhibition of apoptosis (53). Although HCMV encodes its own DNA polymerase, it is dependent on other cellular resources for DNA replication. Infection of quiescent cells induces passage toward S phase such that the host cell is stimulated to generate proteins and DNA precursors necessary for genome replication; however, entry into S phase and cellular DNA replication are subsequently blocked and the cell arrests in G₁/S (1, 10, 11, 14, 30, 45). Cellular resources are thereby presumably free to be efficiently utilized for viral replication. Cell cycle arrest by HCMV is achieved in part through the misregulation of several cell cycle proteins, including the phosphorylation and accumulation of the Rb family pocket proteins, upregulation of cyclins E and B and their associated kinase activities, inhibition of cyclin A expression, stabilization of p53, and accumulation of Cdc6 and geminin, which inhibits licensing of the cellular origins of DNA replication (8, 17, 30, 49, 54, 65). Some of these cell cycle defects can be attributed to a deregulation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) (8, 72, 79, 80), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is responsible for the timely degradation of cell cycle proteins and mitotic cyclins to promote cycle progression from mitosis through G₁ to S phase (58, 74). As the APC also appears to be a common target among other viruses, including the chicken anemia virus, adenoviruses, and poxviruses (23, 36, 52, 70), understanding the mechanisms leading to its inactivation during viral infection has been of great interest.As we have previously reported, multiple mechanisms may be involved in disabling the APC during HCMV infection (72), which is not surprising given the complexity of its structure and regulation (for a review, see references 58 and 74). The APC is a large multisubunit complex consisting of at least 11 conserved core subunits, as well as other species-specific subunits. In metazoans, the APC2 and APC11 subunits form the catalytic core, and along with APC10, provide the platform for binding the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Each of the APC3, APC8, APC6, and APC7 subunits contain multiple copies of the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motif and together make up the TPR subcomplex, which provides a platform of protein interaction surfaces for binding the coactivators (i.e., Cdh1 and Cdc20) and various substrates. These two subcomplexes are bridged by the large scaffolding subunit APC1, with the TPR subcomplex tethered to APC1 through APC4 and APC5. The binding between APC1, APC4, APC5, and APC8 is also interdependent, such that the loss of one subunit decreases the association of the other three (71).The APC is activated by either of its coactivators, Cdh1 or Cdc20, which also function in recruiting specific substrates to the APC during different phases of the cell cycle. The phosphorylation of several APC subunits at the onset of mitosis, including APC1 and the TPR subunits, by cyclin B/cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) and Plk1 allows the binding of Cdc20 and subsequent activation of the APC (APC^Cdc20) (19, 37), whereas the binding and activation of the complex by Cdh1 is inhibited through its phosphorylation by cyclin B/Cdk1 (9, 29, 38, 83). As cells pass the spindle assembly checkpoint, APC^Cdc20 ubiquitinates securin (to allow for sister chromatid separation) and cyclin B for degradation by the proteasome (42, 67). The subsequent inactivation of Cdk1 and activation of mitotic phosphatases during late anaphase relieves the inhibitory phosphorylation on Cdh1, presumably by Cdc14 (6, 38, 44), which then allows Cdh1 to bind and activate the APC (APC^Cdh1). APC^Cdh1 ubiquitinates Cdc20 and mitotic cyclins for degradation to facilitate mitotic exit and maintains their low levels, along with S-phase regulators (e.g., Cdc6, geminin, etc.), during G₁ (16, 50, 59, 63). The inactivation of APC^Cdh1 as cells enter S phase may be mediated in part through the phosphorylation of Cdh1 by cyclin A/Cdk2 (46) and Cdh1 binding to the inhibitor Emi1 (25). The inactivation of Cdh1 by phosphorylation has been shown in all organisms studied thus far (e.g., yeast, Drosophila, plants, mammals, etc.), and mutants mimicking constitutively phosphorylated Cdh1 on Cdk consensus sites can neither bind nor activate the APC in vivo or in vitro (9, 29, 38, 69, 83).During HCMV infection of fibroblasts in G₀/G₁, however, Cdh1 becomes prematurely phosphorylated in a Cdk-independent manner and no longer associates with the APC (72). This dissociation does not appear to be due to an overexpression of Emi1 (79). Cdc20 also can no longer associate with the APC (79), suggesting a defect in the APC core. We have further shown that the APC core complex disassembles during the infection, with the TPR subunits (i.e., APC3, APC7, and APC8) and APC10 localizing to the cytosol, while APC1 remains nuclear (72). Interestingly, both the phosphorylation of Cdh1 and the dissociation of the APC occur at similar times during HCMV infection. Although either of these mechanisms could render the APC inactive, it was unclear whether these processes are linked or represent independent (or redundant) pathways. The causative factor(s) in mediating these events and the question of whether such a factor(s) was of cellular or viral origin also remained unresolved.On the basis of the results of several recent studies (26, 32, 62), the viral protein kinase UL97 emerged as a likely candidate for involvement in the phosphorylation of Cdh1. Conserved among herpesviruses, UL97 functions in viral genome replication (7, 32, 81) and in nuclear egress of viral capsids (21, 39, 48). UL97 is present in the tegument of the virus particle (76) and is also expressed de novo with early kinetics (i.e., detectable by 5 h p.i. by Western blot assay), with increased expression at later times of the infection (51, 76, 77). UL97 is a serine/threonine (S/T) protein kinase (22), and recent studies have further characterized it as a Cdkl mimic, with predicted structural similarity to Cdk2 (64) and common substrates. UL97 has been shown to phosphorylate in vitro nuclear lamin A/C (21), the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (5), the translation elongation factor 1δ (EF1δ) (33), and Rb (26, 62) on sites targeted by Cdks, and there is considerable evidence that UL97 phosphorylates lamin A/C, EF1δ, and Rb on these sites in infected cells as well (21, 26, 33, 62). Given that cyclin A/Cdk2 and cyclin B/Cdk1 complexes normally phosphorylate Cdh1, thus preventing its association with the APC, we hypothesized that UL97 phosphorylates Cdh1 during HCMV infection.In the present study, we provide further mechanistic details of the events and players involved in inactivating the APC during HCMV infection. Evidence that UL97 is the viral factor mediating the phosphorylation of Cdh1 was obtained. However, APC disassembly still occurred at similar times in ΔUL97 and wild-type virus infections, indicating that UL97-mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 is not required for this event. The inactivation of the APC core complex is further attributed to the loss of the APC5 and APC4 subunits early during the infection. The degradation of these subunits is proteasome dependent and requires de novo synthesis of viral early or cellular proteins. While the primary mechanism of inactivation appears to be the dissociation of the complex and the targeted loss of APC5 and APC4, phosphorylation of Cdh1 may provide a small kinetic advantage and backup mechanism for disabling the APC.