Replication fork collisions cause pathological chromosomal amplification in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase

Duplication and transmission of chromosomes require precise control of chromosome replication and segregation. Here we present evidence that RecG is a major factor influencing these processes in bacteria. We show that the extensive DnaA-independent stable DNA replication observed without RecG can lead to replication of any area of the chromosome. This replication is further elevated following irradiation with UV light and appears to be perpetuated by secondary events that continue long after the elimination of UV lesions. The resulting pathological cascade is associated with an increased number of replication forks traversing the chromosome, sometimes with extensive regional amplification of the chromosome, and with the accumulation of highly branched DNA intermediates containing few Holliday junctions. We propose that the cascade is triggered by replication fork collisions that generate 3' single-strand DNA flaps, providing sites for PriA to initiate re-replication of the DNA and thus to generate linear duplexes that provoke recombination, allowing priming of even further replication. Our results shed light on why termination of replication in bacteria is normally limited to a single encounter of two forks and carefully orchestrated within a restricted area, and explain how a system of multiple forks and random termination can operate in eukaryotes.     

RecQ-dependent death-by-recombination in cells lacking RecG and UvrD

Maintenance of genomic stability is critical for all cells. Homologous recombination (HR) pathways promote genome stability using evolutionarily conserved proteins such as RecA, SSB, and RecQ, the Escherichia coli homologue of five human proteins at least three of which suppress genome instability and cancer. A previous report indicated that RecQ promotes the net accumulation in cells of intermolecular HR intermediates (IRIs), a net effect opposite that of the yeast and two human RecQ homologues. Here we extend those conclusions. We demonstrate that cells that lack both UvrD, an inhibitor of RecA-mediated strand exchange, and RecG, a DNA helicase implicated in IRI resolution, are inviable. We show that the uvrD recG cells die a “death-by-recombination” in which IRIs accumulate blocking chromosome segregation. First, their death requires RecA HR protein. Second, the death is accompanied by cytogenetically visible failure to segregate chromosomes. Third, FISH analyses show that the unsegregated chromosomes have completed replication, supporting the hypothesis that unresolved IRIs prevented the segregation. Fourth, we show that RecQ and induction of the SOS response are required for the accumulation of replicated, unsegregated chromosomes and death, as are RecF, RecO, and RecJ. ExoI exonuclease and MutL mismatch-repair protein are partially required. This set of genes is similar but not identical to those that promote death-by-recombination of ΔuvrD Δruv cells. The data support models in which RecQ promotes the net accumulation in cells of IRIs and RecG promotes resolution of IRIs that form via pathways not wholly identical to those that produce the IRIs resolved by RuvABC. This implies that RecG resolves intermediates other than or in addition to standard Holliday junctions resolved by RuvABC. The role of RecQ in net accumulation of IRIs may be shared by one or more of its human homologues.     

Structural analysis of DNA replication fork reversal by RecG

The stalling of DNA replication forks that occurs as a consequence of encountering DNA damage is a critical problem for cells. RecG protein is involved in the processing of stalled replication forks, and acts by reversing the fork past the damage to create a four-way junction that allows template switching and lesion bypass. We have determined the crystal structure of RecG bound to a DNA substrate that mimics a stalled replication fork. The structure not only reveals the elegant mechanism used by the protein to recognize junctions but has also trapped the protein in the initial stage of fork reversal. We propose a mechanism for how forks are processed by RecG to facilitate replication fork restart. In addition, this structure suggests that the mechanism and function of the two largest helicase superfamilies are distinct.     

Bacillus subtilis RecG branch migration translocase is required for DNA repair and chromosomal segregation

The absence of Bacillus subtilis RecG branch migration translocase causes a defect in cell proliferation, renders cells very sensitive to DNA-damaging agents and increases approximately 150-fold the amount of non-partitioned chromosomes. Inactivation of recF, addA, recH, recV or recU increases both the sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and the chromosomal segregation defect of recG mutants. Deletion of recS or recN gene partially suppresses cell proliferation, DNA repair and segregation defects of DeltarecG cells, whereas deletion of recA only partially suppresses the segregation defect of DeltarecG cells. Deletion of recG and ripX render cells with very poor viability, extremely sensitive to DNA-damaging agents, and with a drastic segregation defect. After exposure to mitomycin C recG or ripX cells show a drastic defect in chromosome partitioning (approximately 40% of the cells), and this defect is even larger (approximately 60% of the cells) in recG ripX cells. Taken together, these data indicate that: (i) RecG defines a new epistatic group (eta), (ii) RecG is required for proper chromosomal segregation even in the presence of other proteins that process and resolve Holliday junctions, and (iii) different avenues could process Holliday junctions.     

DNA double strand break repair and crossing over mediated by RuvABC resolvase and RecG translocase

DNA double-strand breaks threaten the stability of the genome, and yet are induced deliberately during meiosis in order to provoke homologous recombination and generate the crossovers needed to promote faithful chromosome transmission. Crossovers are secured via biased resolution of the double Holliday junction intermediates formed when both ends of the broken chromosome engage an intact homologue. To investigate whether the enzymes catalysing branch migration and resolution of Holliday junctions are directed to favour production of either crossover or noncrossover products, we engineered a genetic system based on DNA breakage induced by the I-SceI endonuclease to detect analogous exchanges in Escherichia coli where the enzymology of recombination is more fully understood. Analysis of the recombinants generated revealed approximately equal numbers of crossover and noncrossover products, regardless of whether repair is mediated via RecG, RuvABC, or the RusA resolvase. We conclude that there little or no control of crossing over at the level of Holliday junction resolution. Thus, if similar resolvases function during meiosis, additional factors must act to bias recombination in favour of crossover progeny.     

A step backward in advancing DNA replication: rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG.

In the October 5 issue of Cell, Singleton et al. report the crystal structure of RecG protein bound to an analog of a stalled DNA replication fork. This structure shows how RecG can recognize branched DNA structures and suggests a mechanism for fork reversal, an early event in recombination-dependent reinitiation of DNA replication.     

Constitutive stable DNA replication in Escherichia coli cells lacking type 1A topoisomerase activity

Type 1A topoisomerases (topos) are ubiquitous enzymes involved in supercoiling regulation and in the maintenance of genome stability. Escherichia coli possesses two type 1A enzymes, topo I (topA) and topo III (topB). Cells lacking both enzymes form very long filaments and have severe chromosome segregation and growth defects. We previously found that RNase HI overproduction or a dnaT::aph mutation could significantly correct these phenotypes. This leads us to hypothesize that they were related to unregulated replication originating from R-loops, i.e. constitutive stable DNA replication (cSDR). cSDR, first observed in rnhA (RNase HI) mutants, is characterized by its persistence for several hours following protein synthesis inhibition and by its requirement for primosome components, including DnaT. Here, to visualize and measure cSDR, the incorporation of the nucleotide analog ethynyl deoxyuridine (EdU) during replication in E. coli cells pre-treated with protein synthesis inhibitors, was revealed by “click” labeling with Alexa Fluor^® 488 in fixed cells, and flow cytometry analysis. cSDR was detected in rnhA mutants, but not in wild-type strains, and the number of cells undergoing cSDR was significantly reduced by the introduction of the dnaT::aph mutation. cSDR was also found in topA, double topA topB but not in topB null cells. This result is consistent with the established function of topo I in the inhibition of R-loop formation. Moreover, our finding that topB rnhA mutants are perfectly viable demonstrates that topo III is not uniquely required during cSDR. Thus, either topo I or III can provide the type 1A topo activity that is specifically required during cSDR to allow chromosome segregation.     

Interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair based on the structure of RecG helicase

Recent studies in Escherichia coli indicate that the interconversion of DNA replication fork and Holliday junction structures underpins chromosome duplication and helps secure faithful transmission of the genome from one generation to the next. It facilitates interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair, and provides means to rescue replication forks stalled by lesions in or on the template DNA. Insight into how this interconversion may be catalysed has emerged from genetic, biochemical and structural studies of RecG protein, a member of superfamily 2 of DNA and RNA helicases. We describe how a single molecule of RecG might target a branched DNA structure and translocate a single duplex arm to drive branch migration of a Holliday junction, interconvert replication fork and Holliday junction structures and displace the invading strand from a D loop formed during recombination at a DNA end. We present genetic evidence suggesting how the latter activity may provide an efficient pathway for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks that avoids crossing over, thus facilitating chromosome segregation at cell division.     

SSB and the RecG DNA helicase: an intimate association to rescue a stalled replication fork

In E. coli, the regression of stalled DNA replication forks is catalyzed by the DNA helicase RecG. One means of gaining access to the fork is by binding to the single strand binding protein or SSB. This interaction occurs via the wedge domain of RecG and the intrinsically disordered linker (IDL) of SSB, in a manner similar to that of SH3 domains binding to PXXP motif‐containing ligands in eukaryotic cells. During loading, SSB remodels the wedge domain so that the helicase domains bind to the parental, duplex DNA, permitting the helicase to translocate using thermal energy. This translocation may be used to clear the fork of obstacles, prior to the initiation of fork regression.     

Apoptosis of cells lacking mitochondrial DNA

The mitochondrial genome of animals encodes a few subcomponents of the respiratory chain complexes I, III and IV, whereas nuclear DNA encodes the overwhelming majority, both in quantitative and qualitative terms, of mitochondrial proteins. Complete depletion of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can be achieved by culturing cells in the presence of inhibitors of mtDNA replication or mitochondrial protein synthesis, giving rise to mutant cells (ϱ∘ cells) which carry morphological near-to-intact mitochondria with respiratory defects. Such cells can be used to study the impact of mitochondrial respiration on apoptosis. ϱ∘ cells do not undergo cell death in response to determined stimuli, yet they conserve their potential to undergo full-blown apoptosis in many experimental systems. This indicates that mtDNA and associated functions (in particular mitochondrial respiration) are irrelevant to apoptosis execution. However, the finding that mtDNA-deficient mitochondria can undergo apoptosis does not argue against the involvement of mitochondria in the apoptotic process, since mitochondria from ϱ∘ cells conserve most of their functions including those involved in the execution of the death programme: permeability transition and release of one or several intermembrane proteins causing nuclear apoptosis. Supported by ARC, ANRS, CNRS, FRM, Fondation de France, INSERM, NATO, Ligue contre le Cancer Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Industrie (France), and Sidaction (to GK). SAS receives a fellowship from the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Ciencia y Educación).     

DNA replication sites in HeLa cells

We previously reported experiments which led us to conclude that DNA synthesis in HeLa cells occurs in association with the nuclear membrane. Subsequent experiments which are reported here provide evidence that DNA synthesis occurs both in proximity to and at sites removed from the nuclear membrane.     

RecG helicase promotes DNA double-strand break repair

Double-strand breaks pose a major threat to the genome and must be repaired accurately if structural and functional integrity are to be preserved. This is usually achieved via homologous recombination, which enables the ends of a broken DNA molecule to engage an intact duplex and prime synthesis of the DNA needed for repair. In Escherichia coli, repair relies on the RecBCD and RecA proteins, the combined ability of which to initiate recombination and form joint-molecule intermediates is well understood. To shed light on subsequent events, we exploited the I-SceI homing endonuclease of yeast to make breaks at I-SceI cleavage sites engineered into the chromosome. We show that survival depends on RecA and RecBCD, and that subsequent events can proceed via either of two pathways, one dependent on the RuvABC Holliday junction resolvase and the other on RecG helicase. Both pathways rely on PriA, presumably to facilitate DNA replication. We discuss the possibility that classical Holliday junctions may not be essential intermediates in repair and consider alternative pathways for RecG-dependent separation of joint molecules formed by RecA.     

Direct rescue of stalled DNA replication forks via the combined action of PriA and RecG helicase activities

The PriA protein of Escherichia coli plays a key role in the rescue of replication forks stalled on the template DNA. One attractive model of rescue relies on homologous recombination to establish a new fork via PriA-mediated loading of the DnaB replicative helicase at D loop intermediates. We provide genetic and biochemical evidence that PriA helicase activity can also rescue a stalled fork by an alternative mechanism that requires manipulation of the fork before loading of DnaB on the lagging strand template. This direct rescue depends on RecG, which unwinds forks and Holliday junctions and interconverts these structures. The combined action of PriA and RecG helicase activities may thus avoid the potential dangers of rescue pathways involving fork breakage and recombination.     

Restriction of RecG translocation by DNA mispairing

BackgroundThe RecG DNA helicase plays a crucial role in stalled replication fork rescue. We have recently discovered that interaction of RecG with single-strand DNA binding protein (SSB) remodels RecG, allowing it to spontaneously translocate upstream of the fork. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that mispairing of DNA could limit such translocation of RecG.MethodsHere, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM) to directly test this hypothesis and investigate how sensitive RecG translocation is to different types of mispairing.ResultsWe found that a CC mispairing, at a distance of 30 bp from the fork position, prevents translocation of RecG over this mispairing. A G-bulge, placed at the same distance, also has a similar blocking efficiency. However, a CC mispairing, 10 bp away from the fork, does not prevent RecG translocation beyond 10 bp distance, but decreases complex yield. Modeling of RecG-DNA complexes show that 10 bp distance from the fork is within the binding footprint of RecG on DNA.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the RecG translocation upstream of the replication fork is limited by mispairings in the parental arm of the replication fork.General significanceThese findings led us to propose dual functions for RecG, in which the thermally driven translocation of RecG can be a mechanism for the additional control of the DNA paring in which RecG can detect the lesions in front of the replication fork, adding to the fidelity of the DNA replication machinery.     

RecG Directs DNA Synthesis during Double-Strand Break Repair

Homologous recombination provides a mechanism of DNA double-strand break repair (DSBR) that requires an intact, homologous template for DNA synthesis. When DNA synthesis associated with DSBR is convergent, the broken DNA strands are replaced and repair is accurate. However, if divergent DNA synthesis is established, over-replication of flanking DNA may occur with deleterious consequences. The RecG protein of Escherichia coli is a helicase and translocase that can re-model 3-way and 4-way DNA structures such as replication forks and Holliday junctions. However, the primary role of RecG in live cells has remained elusive. Here we show that, in the absence of RecG, attempted DSBR is accompanied by divergent DNA replication at the site of an induced chromosomal DNA double-strand break. Furthermore, DNA double-stand ends are generated in a recG mutant at sites known to block replication forks. These double-strand ends, also trigger DSBR and the divergent DNA replication characteristic of this mutant, which can explain over-replication of the terminus region of the chromosome. The loss of DNA associated with unwinding joint molecules previously observed in the absence of RuvAB and RecG, is suppressed by a helicase deficient PriA mutation (priA300), arguing that the action of RecG ensures that PriA is bound correctly on D-loops to direct DNA replication rather than to unwind joint molecules. This has led us to put forward a revised model of homologous recombination in which the re-modelling of branched intermediates by RecG plays a fundamental role in directing DNA synthesis and thus maintaining genomic stability.     

Subphases of DNA replication in Drosophila cells

Exponentially growing Drosophila S2 cells in suspension culture were synchronized at low- and high-resolution centrifugal elutriation, and DNA synthesis was measured by [(3)H]-thymidine incorporation throughout the S phase. At low resolution, one repair peak at the G(1)/G(0) border and two replication peaks known as early and late S subphases were observed. At high resolution, six chronologic compartments were distinguished. The distribution of these peaks indicated one repair peak at 2.05 C value, one minor replication peak at 2.43C, and four major subphases of replication corresponding to 2.64C, 2.89C, 3.32C, and 3.60C, representing 6.7%, 3.4%, 15.3%, 20.4%, 32.1%, and 22.0% of the synthetic activity, respectively. The five major peaks of cell growth with 2.32C, 2.56C, 2.85C, 3.18C, and 3.58C values consistently preceded those of replication subphases.     

Direction of DNA replication in mammalian cells

We have re-examined the direction of DNA synthesis in mammalian cells by means of pulse-labeling with [³H]thymidine and DNA autoradiography. Our results show that, whether or not the cells are treated with 5-fluoro-deoxyuridine, and whether they are labeled first with high specific activity [³H]thymidine and then with low, or vice versa, most (? 90%) of the unambiguous autoradiographic patterns can be explained by bidirectional replication but not by unidirectional replication.We also find that in autoradiographic experiments using two different specific activities of [³H]thymidine, obvious differences in grain density are obtained only when the difference in specific activity is threefold or more. Thus, the apparently contradictory findings of Lark et al. (1971) can be explained by the low difference in specific activity used by those authors.