小G蛋白RhoA与细胞发育

细胞发育是细胞内各种复杂反应在时间和空间上有序协调的过程, 包括细胞增殖、胞质分裂、细胞运动、细胞分化和组织生成等．作为G蛋白家族重要成员的RhoA起了重要的调控作用：在G蛋白调控因子(如GEF XPLN、 p115RhoGEF、p190RhoGAP等）的作用下,活化的RhoA依次与效应蛋白分子（如ROCK1/2、 mDia、 PRK1/2、 citron 激酶等）结合, 从而开启了下游的信号通路, 最终使细胞能够迅速地对外界刺激做出反应．干细胞是一类既能自我更新又能特异分化形成终末分化细胞的细胞, 而 RhoA对干细胞的自我更新和定向分化也起着“开关"作用, 对RhoA信号通路的调节调控了胚胎发生、神经发生、造血生成及成骨和肌肉生成等干细胞分化发育过程．肿瘤是正常细胞在各种因素长期作用下增殖异常的产物, 而RhoA异常表达与肿瘤的发生、侵润与转移密切相关, RhoA信号通路与p53等基因的交互作用在肿瘤的发育过程中也发挥了重要的作用．     

Small GTPases take the stage

Small GTPases are molecular switches that have been adopted to control many eukaryotic cell functions. Starting with the study of the protooncogene Ras in the early 1980s, detailed pathways have been uncovered upstream and downstream of Ras-related GTP binding proteins. Nonetheless, novel members have been discovered at a pace that has outstripped cell biologists, and thus much remains to be established regarding newer family members. Undiscovered functions are still being uncovered for "established" small GTPases such as Ras, Rho, and Ran. The topics covered at this meeting indeed demonstrate that Ras proteins are at the heart of cellular dynamics.     

Model scenarios for evolution of the eukaryotic cell cycle

Progress through the division cycle of present day eukaryotic cells is controlled by a complex network consisting of (i) cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their associated cyclins, (ii) kinases and phosphatases that regulate CDK activity, and (iii) stoichiometric inhibitors that sequester cyclin-CDK dimers. Presumably regulation of cell division in the earliest ancestors of eukaryotes was a considerably simpler affair. Nasmyth (1995) recently proposed a mechanism for control of a putative, primordial, eukaryotic cell cycle, based on antagonistic interactions between a cyclin-CDK and the anaphase promoting complex (APC) that labels the cyclin subunit for proteolysis. We recast this idea in mathematical form and show that the model exhibits hysteretic behaviour between alternative steady states: a Gl-like state (APC on, CDK activity low, DNA unreplicated and replication complexes assembled) and an S/M-like state (APC off, CDK activity high, DNA replicated and replication complexes disassembled). In our model, the transition from G1 to S/M ('Start') is driven by cell growth, and the reverse transition ('Finish') is driven by completion of DNA synthesis and proper alignment of chromosomes on the metaphase plate. This simple and effective mechanism for coupling growth and division and for accurately copying and partitioning a genome consisting of numerous chromosomes, each with multiple origins of replication, could represent the core of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Furthermore, we show how other controls could be added to this core and speculate on the reasons why stoichiometric inhibitors and CDK inhibitory phosphorylation might have been appended to the primitive alternation between cyclin accumulation and degradation.     

Small GTPases in vesicle trafficking

Plant small GTPases belonging to the Rop, Arf, and Rab families are regulators of vesicle trafficking. Rop GTPases regulate actin dynamics and modulate H(2)O(2) production in polar cell growth and pathogen defence. A candidate Rop GDP to Rop GTP exchange factor (RopGEF) SPIKE1 is involved in the morphogenesis of leaf epidermal cells. The ArfGEF GNOM regulates the endosomal recycling of the PIN proteins, which are involved in polar auxin transport. Intracellular localisation of small GTPases and functional studies using dominant mutant versions of Arf and Rab GTPases are defining novel plant-specific membrane compartments, especially those that participate in endosomal vesicle trafficking.     

Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases

Sequences and available structures were compared for all the widely distributed representatives of the P-loop GTPases and GTPase-related proteins with the aim of constructing an evolutionary classification for this superclass of proteins and reconstructing the principal events in their evolution. The GTPase superclass can be divided into two large classes, each of which has a unique set of sequence and structural signatures (synapomorphies). The first class, designated TRAFAC (after translation factors) includes enzymes involved in translation (initiation, elongation, and release factors), signal transduction (in particular, the extended Ras-like family), cell motility, and intracellular transport. The second class, designated SIMIBI (after signal recognition particle, MinD, and BioD), consists of signal recognition particle (SRP) GTPases, the assemblage of MinD-like ATPases, which are involved in protein localization, chromosome partitioning, and membrane transport, and a group of metabolic enzymes with kinase or related phosphate transferase activity. These two classes together contain over 20 distinct families that are further subdivided into 57 subfamilies (ancient lineages) on the basis of conserved sequence motifs, shared structural features, and domain architectures. Ten subfamilies show a universal phyletic distribution compatible with presence in the last universal common ancestor of the extant life forms (LUCA). These include four translation factors, two OBG-like GTPases, the YawG/YlqF-like GTPases (these two subfamilies also consist of predicted translation factors), the two signal-recognition-associated GTPases, and the MRP subfamily of MinD-like ATPases. The distribution of nucleotide specificity among the proteins of the GTPase superclass indicates that the common ancestor of the entire superclass was a GTPase and that a secondary switch to ATPase activity has occurred on several independent occasions during evolution. The functions of most GTPases that are traceable to LUCA are associated with translation. However, in contrast to other superclasses of P-loop NTPases (RecA-F1/F0, AAA+, helicases, ABC), GTPases do not participate in NTP-dependent nucleic acid unwinding and reorganizing activities. Hence, we hypothesize that the ancestral GTPase was an enzyme with a generic regulatory role in translation, with subsequent diversification resulting in acquisition of diverse functions in transport, protein trafficking, and signaling. In addition to the classification of previously known families of GTPases and related ATPases, we introduce several previously undetected families and describe new functional predictions.     

真核生物FANCJ-like蛋白的结构与进化

FANCJ-like蛋白是一类ATP依赖的5′-3′DNA解旋酶,参与DNA损伤修复、同源重组及G4-DNA拆解,在基因组稳定性维持过程中发挥重要功能。文章系统分析了47种真核生物的FANCJ-like蛋白,对其序列结构特征及起源进化进行了深入探讨。真核生物FANCJ-like蛋白包含4类成员——XPD、CHL1、RTEL1和FANCJ,但在真菌的一些世系及昆虫中存在严重缺失现象,如接合菌门(Zygomycota)缺失了RTEL1,担子菌门(Basidiomycota)和子囊菌门(Ascomycota)缺失了RTEL1和FANCJ,双翅目昆虫缺失了FANCJ。FANCJ-like蛋白不仅包含经典解旋酶共有HD1和HD2结构域,而且在HD1结构域中插入了自身特有的Fe-S、Arch和Extra-D结构域。Fe-S和Arch结构域在4类成员中较保守,Extra-D结构域在XPD中不存在,在其他3类成员中也各不相同。在FANCJ-like蛋白的Fe-S、Arch和Extra-D结构域中分别发现了7个、10个和2个特有模体;除了已报道的保守模体外,HD1和HD2中分别发现了5个和12个特有模体。从这些特有模体的组成和排布来看,RTEL1和FANCJ最为相近,它们在HD2区包含两个独有模体Vb2和Vc,可能与其G4-DNA解旋活性相关。进化方面的证据表明,FANCJ-like蛋白起源于一种HD1区插入了Fe-S和Arch结构域的DNA解旋酶,在多细胞真核生物出现之前,该蛋白通过3次复制事件和随后的特异化过程,依次形成了目前真核生物所包含的4类FANCJ-like蛋白。     

Transposable elements and the evolution of eukaryotic complexity

Eukaryotic transposable elements are ubiquitous and widespread mobile genetic entities. These elements often make up a substantial fraction of the host genomes in which they reside. For example, approximately 1/2 of the human genome was recently shown to consist of transposable element sequences. There is a growing body of evidence that demonstrates that transposable elements have been major players in genome evolution. A sample of this evidence is reviewed here with an emphasis on the role that transposable elements may have played in driving the evolution of eukaryotic complexity. A number of specific scenarios are presented that implicate transposable elements in the evolution of the complex molecular and cellular machinery that are characteristic of the eukaryotic domain of life.     

Ltr retrotransposons and the evolution of eukaryotic enhancers

Since LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses are especially prone to regional duplications and recombination events, these viral-like systems may be especially conducive to the evolution of closely spaced combinatorial regulatory motifs. Using the Drosophila copia LTR retrotransposon as a model, we show that a regulatory region contained within the element's untranslated leader region (ULR) consists of multiple copies of an 8 bp motif (TTGTGAAA) with similarity to the core sequence of the SV40 enhancer. Naturally occurring variation in the number of these motifs is correlated with the enhancer strength of the ULR. Our results indicate that inter-element selection may favor the evolution of more active enhancers within permissive genetic backgrounds. We propose that LTR retroelements and perhaps other retrotransposons constitute drive mechanisms for the evolution of eukaryotic enhancers which can be subsequently distributed throughout host genomes to play a role in regulatory evolution. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Cadherin-mediated Intercellular Adhesion and Signaling Cascades Involving Small GTPases

Epithelia form physical barriers that separate the internal milieu of the body from its external environment. The biogenesis of functional epithelia requires the precise coordination of many cellular processes. One of the key events in epithelial biogenesis is the establishment of cadherin-dependent cell–cell contacts, which initiate morphological changes and the formation of other adhesive structures. Cadherin-mediated adhesions generate intracellular signals that control cytoskeletal reorganization, polarity, and vesicle trafficking. Among such signaling pathways, those involving small GTPases play critical roles in epithelial biogenesis. Assembly of E-cadherin activates several small GTPases and, in turn, the activated small GTPases control the effects of E-cadherin-mediated adhesions on epithelial biogenesis. Here, we focus on small GTPase signaling at E-cadherin-mediated epithelial junctions.Cell–cell adhesions are involved in a diverse range of physiological processes, including morphological changes during tissue development, cell scattering, wound healing, and synaptogenesis (Adams and Nelson 1998; Gumbiner 2000; Halbleib and Nelson 2006; Takeichi 1995; Tepass et al. 2000). In epithelial cells, cell–cell adhesions are classified into three kinds of adhesions: adherens junction, tight junction, and desmosome (for more details, see Meng and Takeichi 2009, Furuse 2009, and Delva et al. 2009, respectively). A key event in epithelial polarization and biogenesis is the establishment of cadherin-dependent cell–cell contacts. Cadherins belong to a large family of adhesion molecules that require Ca²⁺ for their homophilic interactions (Adams and Nelson 1998; Blanpain and Fuchs 2009; Gumbiner 2000; Hartsock and Nelson 2008; Takeichi 1995; Tepass et al. 2000). Cadherins form transinteraction on the surface of neighboring cells (for details, see Shapiro and Weis 2009). For the development of strong and rigid adhesions, cadherins are clustered concomitantly with changes in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton (Tsukita et al. 1992). Classical cadherins are required, but not sufficient, to initiate cell–cell contacts, and other adhesion protein complexes subsequently assemble (for details, see Green et al. 2009). These complexes include the tight junction, which controls paracellular permeability, and desmosomes, which support the structural continuum of epithelial cells. A fundamental problem is to understand how these diverse cellular processes are regulated and coordinated. Intracellular signals, generated when cells attach with one another, mediate these complicated processes.Several signaling pathways upstream or downstream of cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesions have been identified (Perez-Moreno et al. 2003) (see also McCrea et al. 2009). Among these pathways, small GTPases including the Rho and Ras family GTPases play critical roles in epithelial biogenesis and have been studied extensively. Many key morphological and functional changes are induced when these small GTPases act at epithelial junctions, where they mediate an interplay between cell–cell adhesion molecules and fundamental cellular processes including cytoskeletal activity, polarity, and vesicle trafficking. In addition to these small GTPases, Ca²⁺ signaling and phosphorylation of cadherin complexes also play pivotal roles in the formation and maintenance of cadherin-mediated adhesions. Here, we focus on signaling pathways involving the small GTPases in E-cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesions. Other signaling pathways are described in recent reviews (Braga 2002; Fukata and Kaibuchi 2001; Goldstein and Macara 2007; McLachlan et al. 2007; Tsukita et al. 2008; Yap and Kovacs 2003; see also McCrea et al. 2009).     

囊泡转运中的Rab小G蛋白与马达分子

Rab是小分子GTP结合蛋白Ras超家族中最大的亚家族,在囊泡运输的不同阶段发挥着调节作用.在与GTP结合后,Rab可募集特异的效应蛋白到膜上.近来发现,许多Rab可募集与微管和肌动蛋白相关的马达分子到靶膜,从而调节相应囊泡的转运.Rab所具有的分子开关特性,使其可在空间和时间上对囊泡转运进行调控.     

Tumor progression: Small GTPases and loss of cell-cell adhesion

Tumor progression involves the transition from normal to malignant cells, through a series of cumulative alterations. During this process, invasive and migratory properties are acquired, enabling cells to metastasize (reach and grow in tissues far from their origin). Numerous cellular changes take place during epithelial malignancy, and disruption of E-cadherin based cell-cell adhesion is a major event. The small Rho GTPases (Rho, Rac and Cdc42) have been implicated in multiple steps during cellular transformation, including alterations on the adhesion status of the tumor cells. This review focuses on recent in vivo evidence that implicates RhoGTPases in epithelial tumor progression. In addition, we discuss different hypotheses to explain disruption of cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion, directly or indirectly, through activation of Rho GTPases. Understanding the molecular mechanism of how cadherin adhesion and RhoGTPases interplay in normal cells and how this balance is altered during cellular transformation will provide clues as to how to interfere with tumor progression.