Does Helicobacter pylori eradication affect symptoms in nonulcer dyspepsia: a 5-year follow-up study

The role of Helicobacter pylori infection in nonulcer dyspepsia remains controversial. To date studies exploring the effect of H. pylori eradication on symptoms have reported conflicting results. Randomised control trials employing validated outcome measures have also been difficult to interpret because of several important issues such as the large placebo response seen in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia and both the natural variability in symptoms and symptom severity with time. The association of symptom improvement with resolution of gastritis has meant that the length of follow up employed in most studies has been insufficient. We report the findings of a randomised placebo controlled trial (n = 100), using a validated symptom questionnaire and 5 year follow up to determine the effect of H. pylori eradication on symptoms in nonulcer dyspepsia. In all 64 that were reviewed at 5 years there was a significant difference between patients who were H. pylori negative and those who remained positive with regard to complete symptom resolution, consumption of relevant medications and peptic ulcer disease development, in favour of active treatment. There was a trend for gradual symptom improvement over time irrespective of H. pylori status, which may reflect the natural history of this condition. For those who remained symptomatic at 5 years, there was no difference in symptom severity based on H. pylori status. The findings of this study support the use of H. pylori eradication in symptomatic patients with nonulcer dyspepsia both to induce symptom resolution and to prevent disease progression.     

Low efficacy rate of moxifloxacin-containing Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: in an observational study in a Turkish population

BACKGROUND: Standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori has an eradication rate of about 50% in Turkey. It may be due to an increased resistance of H. pylori to antibiotics. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a new second-generation fluoroquinolone, moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy in H. pylori eradication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an open-label, prospective, single-center, pilot study. We studied 71 dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori diagnosed by both histology and rapid urease test. Out of 71 dyspeptic patients, 64 had non-ulcer dyspepsia and seven had peptic ulcer. Patients received pantoprazole (40 mg b.i.d.) plus moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 14 days. Eradication was assessed 4 weeks after completing the therapy by histology and rapid urease test. Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were determined. RESULTS: The eradication rate was 42.2% for the intention-to-treat analysis and 47.6% for the per-protocol analysis. Of all patients included in the study, 29.5% had side-effects and only 2.8% of the patients discontinued the treatment because of side-effects. Most of the complications were mild and self-limiting. CONCLUSION: Triple therapy with pantoprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin for 14 days yielded unacceptably low eradication rates. However, using tests of susceptibility to antibiotics, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to judge these eradication rates of moxifloxacin containing eradication treatment.     

Helicobacter pylori recurrence in developed and developing countries: meta-analysis of 13C-urea breath test follow-up after eradication

Objective: Recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection after eradication is rare in developed countries and more frequent in developing countries. Most recurrent cases are attributed to recrudescence (recolonization of the same strain within 12 months) rather than to reinfection (colonization with a new strain after more than 12 months). The aim of the study was to analyze recurrence rates in developed and developing countries and to deduce the relative roles of recrudescence and reinfection. Methods: The PubMed database was searched up to January 31, 2007 using the keywords “Helicobacter pylori” or “H. pylori” and “recurrence” or “recrudescence,” or “reinfection.” Only prospective case studies in adults that used the ¹³C‐urea breath test (¹³CUBT) were included. Meta‐analyses were performed with statdirect Statistical software, version 2.6.1, StatsDirect Ltd, Chesire, UK. Results: The literature search yielded 10 studies of H. pylori recurrence in developed countries (3014 patients followed for 24–60 months) and 7 studies in developing countries (2071 patients followed for 12–60 months). The calculated annual recurrence rates were 2.67% and 13.00%, respectively. Nested meta‐analysis of cases with a longer follow‐up after eradication revealed an annual recurrence rate of 1.45% (RR 0.54) in developed countries and 12.00% (RR 0.92) in developing countries. Conclusions: The similarity of the annual recurrence rates during the first year after eradication and the annual recurrence rates in the second year after successful eradication in developing countries supports reinfection as the main cause in the second period. Therefore, a different approach for follow‐up of H. pylori eradication may be needed between developed and developing countries.     

Evaluation of a four-drug, three-antibiotic, nonbismuth-containing "concomitant" therapy as first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in Greece

Background: The eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with standard treatments are decreasing worldwide as in Greece. Studies with new antibiotic combinations are needed to find better methods of eradication. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of a 10‐day, four‐drug, three‐antibiotic, nonbismuth–containing concomitant regimen. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective, open‐label, multicenter study that included 131 patients infected with H. pylori. All patients were diagnosed with peptic ulcer disease or nonulcer dyspepsia by endoscopy. H. pylori infection was established by at least two positive tests among rapid urease test, gastric histology, and ¹³C‐urea breath test. For 10 days, all patients received esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxycillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all b.d. eradication was assessed with ¹³C urea breath test 8 weeks after the start of treatment. Intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol eradication rates were determined. Results: One hundred and twenty‐seven of the 131 patients completed the study. At intention‐to‐treat analysis, the eradication rate was 91.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 85.5–95.7%). For the per‐protocol analysis, the eradication rate was 94.5% (95% CI, 89–97.8%). Adverse events were noted in 42 of 131 (32.1%); drug compliance was excellent with 96.9% of the patients taking more than 90% of the prescribed medication. Conclusion: A 10‐day concomitant regimen appears to be an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated treatment option for first‐line H. pylori eradication in Greece.     

Predictive factors for improvement of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia after Helicobacter pylori eradication: a three-year follow-up study in Korea

Background and Aims: To date, data on the effects of anti‐Helicobacter therapy on the improvement of atrophic gastritis (AG) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) have been conflicting. This study was performed to investigate whether eradication of H. pylori could lead to the improvement of AG and IM, and the prognostic factors associated with the improvement of AG and IM. Methods: Four hundred patients consisting of H. pylori‐negative (n = 116) and H. pylori‐positive (n = 284) groups were followed up 1 and 3 years after initial H. pylori tests. Serum levels of pepsinogen (PG), bacteria, environmental factors, and genetic polymorphisms were determined. Results: The grade of corpus atrophy decreased at 1 and 3 years after successful eradication (p < .001 and p = .033, respectively). However, there was no significant change in the IM in the antrum and in the corpus. Prediction factors for the improvement of corpus AG by H. pylori eradication were baseline low PG I/II ratio (≤3), high salt intake, and corpus‐predominant gastritis. IM improvement was also associated with spicy food intake and high baseline grade of IM, in addition to these factors. In addition, IL‐1B‐511 C/T and IL‐6‐572 C/G alleles were found to inhibit IM improvement. However, H. pylori‐negative and noneradicated group did not show any significant change in AG or IM. Conclusion: Corpus AG was reversed by H. pylori eradication, and improvement of IM by H. pylori eradiation was more definite in patients with severe IM, low PG I/II ratio, and corpus‐predominant gastritis, suggesting that H. pylori eradication is valuable even in severe cases.     

Low efficacy of clarithromycin including sequential regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection

Background: Sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) appears to achieve a better eradication rate than triple therapy. However, most of the data have been reported from the Italy, and studies from different population are needed before it is recommended in clinical practice. The present study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of two separate clarithromycin including sequential regimens in Turkey which is well known with high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance to H. pylori. Methods: Consecutive H. pylori ‐positive patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia were randomly allocated to one of the two sequential regimens; the first group was given lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for the first week, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. for the second week (LA‐CM). The second arm was given the same regimen but tetracycline500 g q.i.d. instead of metronidazole (LA‐CT). H. pylori was detected with urea breath test (UBT) and histology before enrollment. UBT was repeated at 6th weeks after treatment. Results: A total of 200 patients were enrolled in groups and 179 of them completed their protocols. The cumulative per protocol (“PP”) and intention‐to‐treat (“ITT”) eradication rates were 74.3% and 66.5% in all patients, respectively. Both “PP” (78.2% vs 70.1%) and “ITT” (72% vs 61%) eradication rates were better in LA‐CT group than LA‐CM group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > .05). Both regimens were well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse effects was comparable. Conclusion: Two weeks clarithromycin including sequential regimens with metronidazole or tetracycline were not achieved acceptable eradication rates in Turkey.     

Clinicopathological analysis of early-stage gastric cancers detected after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background and Aims: The results of a randomized controlled study and meta‐analysis study have recently proved that Helicobacter pylori eradication has a preventive effect against the development of metachronous and primary gastric cancer. However, gastric cancer is sometimes detected after successful eradication. There is a lack of study about gastric cancers in eradicated patients. To clarify the characteristics of gastric cancers detected after H. pylori eradication, we analyzed the clinicopathological features of these cancers. Methods: The subjects were 18 early‐stage gastric cancer specimens resected from 17 patients who had received successful eradication of H. pylori from February 1995 to March 2009. The control group consisted of 36 specimens from noneradicated patients with persistent H. pylori infection who were matched with the subjects in age, sex, and depth of invasion. Clinicopathological features and mucin phenotypes of gastric cancer were clinically and immunohistologically evaluated. Results: The average diameter of gastric cancer was smaller and Ki‐67 index was lower in the eradication group. The morphological distribution of depression types was significantly lower in the control group. Immunohistochemical phenotyping revealed that 72.2% of the lesions in the eradicated group were complete gastric type or gastric predominant mixed type, whereas the percentages of gastric type and intestinal type in the control group were similar. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancers detected after H. pylori eradication are different from those of gastric cancers in patients with persistent H. pylori infection. H. pylori eradication may suppress intestinalization during the development of gastric cancer.     

An evaluation of a serologic test with a current infection marker of Helicobacter pylori before and after eradication therapy in Chinese

Background and Aims: Development of an accurate and less cumbersome noninvasive method to detect current Helicobacter pylori infection is essential in clinic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CIM test, also known as the Assure®H. pylori Rapid Test (Genelabs Diagnostics Pty. Ltd., Singapore), for the diagnosis of current H. pylori infection before and after eradication therapy in Chinese population. Methods: A total of 452 eligible people were recruited for this study in Jiangsu Province, China. Each individual underwent a ¹³C urea breath test (¹³C‐UBT). For the evaluation of CIM test after eradication, 115 H. pylori‐positive outpatients were treated with 1‐week triple therapy. One month after the end of therapy, the patients underwent ¹³C‐UBT again, and the CIM‐test was performed 1, 3, and 6 months after the end of therapy. Its performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy) were determined using the ¹³C‐UBT as a gold standard for H. pylori diagnosis. Results: H. pylori was detected in 221 (65.6%) of the 337 people by ¹³C‐UBT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the CIM test were 93.2%, 90.5%, 94.9%, 87.5%, and 92.3%, respectively, using ¹³C‐UBT as a gold standard. One month after eradication therapy, the sensitivity, specificity of CIM test were only 50% and 66.7%, 66.7% and 84.6% 3‐month after eradication therapy and the sensitivity, specificity increased to 85.7% and 96.9%, respectively, when CIM test was used 6 months after the end of anti‐H. pylori therapy. Conclusions: The CIM test is a simple, rapid, accurate, cheap, and near‐people test. It may be satisfactory for detecting H. pylori infection in cases without eradication therapy, but it could not differentiate the past or current infection correctly within 6 months after anti‐H. pylori therapy.     

Efficacy and safety of faropenem in eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori

Aims: While triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is the standard therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication, it is ineffective against clarithromycin‐resistant strains. To seek a better regimen for eradication therapy, we assessed the sensitivity of clinical strains seen in Japan to faropenem and then evaluated the efficacy and safety of eradication therapy containing this antibiotic. Methods: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of faropenem were determined in 78 Japanese clinical H. pylori isolates using the agar dilution method. H. pylori‐positive patients were consecutively assigned to a 7‐day eradication therapy protocol with LAF (lansoprazole 60 mg/day, amoxicillin 2000 mg/day, and faropenem 600 mg/day), and then to a 14‐day protocol. The outcomes of the therapies were assessed by ¹³C‐urea breath tests. Results: All 78 strains showed MICs of faropenem that were equal to or less than 0.2 µg/mL. The eradication rates according to intention‐to‐treat analyses were 46.5% with the 7‐day therapy (n = 43) and 62.5% with the 14‐day therapy (n = 32). No special measures were required to treat the adverse events observed in approximately one‐third of the patients. Conclusions: Faropenem was found to have good antimicrobial action against H. pylori in vitro. The 14‐day LAF therapy successfully eradicated H. pylori in about two‐thirds of the patients although the incidence of adverse events was high.     

Efficacy of 2-week, second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole for the Japanese population

Background: Following the failure of first‐line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin, second‐line therapy is conducted for 1 week using metronidazole instead of clarithromycin in Japan. Recent studies indicate that metronidazole‐containing therapy has a higher eradication rate with prolonged treatment duration, even with metronidazole resistance. The aim of this study was to reveal the efficacy of 2‐week metronidazole‐containing second‐line therapy. Methods: Eighty‐two consecutive outpatients who had failed in the first‐line eradication therapy were enrolled and second‐line therapy was initiated with 10 mg rabeprazole, 750 mg amoxicillin, and 250 mg metronidazole twice daily. After they had been screened by hematological examination 1 week after initiation, the treatment was continued for 2 weeks after initiation in patients without hematological abnormality. Cure was essentially confirmed by the urea breath test. Results: After one patient was lost, hematological examination showed elevated serum aminotransferase in 14 of 81 patients. Although it was mild without clinical issues, they were ethically excluded from this study. In the remaining 67 patients and the lost patient, the eradication rate with 2‐week therapy was 65/68 (96%, 95% confidence interval: 88–98%) by intention to treat analysis and 65/65 (100%, 94–100%) by per protocol analysis. The main adverse event was soft stools (39%), and no serious adverse event was observed. Conclusion: This 2‐week metronidazole‐containing second‐line therapy provides high efficacy in Japan where metronidazole resistance is rare.     

Is the recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection after eradication therapy resultant from recrudescence or reinfection,in Japan

Background. Reinfection of Helicobacter pylori after eradication is rare in developed countries but most often occurs within 1 year. In the present study, we attempted to differentiate between reinfection and recrudescence of H. pylori strains between 6 months and 6 years after successful eradication in Japan, a country with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection. Materials and Methods. After successful eradication of H. pylori, 274 patients were followed up by endoscopy and urea breath test. In recurrent patients, H. pylori strains isolated initially and after recurrence were compared using PCR‐based restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Results. Recurrence of H. pylori occurred in 15 of 274 patients (5.5%) at 6 months after eradication and the annual recurrence rate was 2.0% per patient year (between 1 and 6 years). PCR‐based RFLP analysis of H. pylori strains isolated initially and after recurrence showed that 62.5% (at 6 months) and 100% (after 1 years) of bacteria were of different strains. Conclusion. Reinfection of H. pylori was not as rare at 6 months after eradication as reported previously, and up to 6 years after eradication, the annual reinfection rate is 2.0% per patient year in Japan.     

Production of reactive oxygen species in peripheral blood is increased in individuals with Helicobacter pylori infection and decreased after its eradication

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection has been reported to cause gastroduodenal ulcer, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer. Recent studies have suggested that H. pylori infection may also associate with other diseases, including hematologic and dermatologic disorders, and cardiovascular injury, by unknown mechanisms. METHODS: Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was determined in peripheral blood samples from 86 patients (34 H. pylori-negative and 52 H. pylori-positive subjects) using a highly sensitive chemiluminescence probe, L-012 (8-amino-5-chloro-7-phenylpyrido(3,4-d) pyridazine-1 and 4 (2H, 3H) dione). Eleven H. pylori-positive individuals were also analyzed their ROS production in peripheral blood after H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: ROS production was significantly higher in individuals with H. pylori infection than in those without infection. Enhanced production of ROS was decreased significantly after eradication of H. pylori. No correlation was found between the extent of ROS production and sex, age, smoking status, alcohol ingestion, use of medications, or serum level of C-reactive protein. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that ROS production was enhanced in peripheral blood by H. pylori infection. Chemiluminescence analysis of blood samples using L-012 permits evaluation of systemic oxidative stress in patients with H. pylori infection.     

益生菌联合四联疗法对幽门螺杆菌感染补救治疗的疗效分析

目的 评价联合应用益生菌在标准四联疗法的不同阶段对幽门螺杆菌（H. pylori）感染补救治疗的疗效。方法 采用回顾性研究,收集首次根除失败因病情需要接受H.pylori补救根除治疗的患者共200例,随机分为4个治疗组,所有患者均采用标准四联疗法（每次服用埃索美拉唑钠肠溶片20 mg＋枸橼酸铋钾220 mg＋阿莫西林1 000 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg）进行治疗。其中A组为单纯四联治疗,不加服金双歧;B组为四联治疗前2周服用金双歧2 000 mg/次;C组为标准四联治疗同时服用金双歧2 000 mg/次;D组为四联治疗结束后开始加用金双歧2 000 mg/次。疗程均为2周,所有患者均随访至少4周,记录其治疗期间发生的不良反应及症状。疗程结束4周后采用13C尿素呼气试验判断H. pylori是否根除。结果 A组、B组、C组和D组患者ITT分析的根除率分别为78.0%（38/50）、80.0%（40/50）、74.0%（37/50）和72.0%（36/50）,差异无统计学意义（χ2=1.096,P=0.778）;4组患者PP分析的根除率分别为81.3%（39/48）、85.1%（40/47）、78.7%（37/47）和78.3%（36/46）,差异无统计学意义（χ2=0.891,P=0.828）。4组患者7 d、14 d不良反应发生率差异有统计学意义（P0.05）。结论 含呋喃唑酮、阿莫西林的标准四联疗法治疗H. pylori感染根除率较高（>80％）,可作为首次根除治疗失败后的补救治疗方案,在补救治疗的不同时期加用益生菌并不能明显提高根除率,但能降低7 d、14 d治疗期间的不良反应发生率。     

Previous Helicobacter pylori infection–induced atrophic gastritis: A distinct disease entity in an understudied population without a history of eradication

Individuals with chronic atrophic gastritis who are negative for active H. pylori infection with no history of eradication therapy have been identified in clinical practice. By excluding false‐negative and autoimmune gastritis cases, it can be surmised that most of these patients have experienced unintentional eradication of H. pylori after antibiotic treatment for other infectious disease, unreported successful eradication, or H. pylori that spontaneously disappeared. These patients are considered to have previous H. pylori infection–induced atrophic gastritis. In this work, we define these cases based on the following criteria: absence of previous H. pylori eradication; atrophic changes on endoscopy or histologic confirmation of glandular atrophy; negative for a current H. pylori infection diagnosed in the absence of proton‐pump inhibitors or antibiotics; and absence of localized corpus atrophy, positivity for autoantibodies, or characteristic histologic findings suggestive of autoimmune gastritis. The risk of developing gastric cancer depends on the atrophic grade. The reported rate of developing gastric cancer is 0.31%‐0.62% per year for successfully eradicated severely atrophic cases (pathophysiologically equal to unintentionally eradicated cases and unreported eradicated cases), and 0.53%‐0.87% per year for spontaneously resolved cases due to severe atrophy. Therefore, for previous H. pylori infection–induced atrophic gastritis cases, we recommend endoscopic surveillance every 3 years for high‐risk patients, including those with endoscopically severe atrophy or intestinal metaplasia. Because of the difficulty involved in the endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer in cases of previous infection, appropriate monitoring of the high‐risk subgroup of this understudied population is especially important.