Pex19p binds Pex30p and Pex32p at regions required for their peroxisomal localization but separate from their peroxisomal targeting signals

The assembly of proteins in the peroxisomal membrane is a multistep process requiring their recognition in the cytosol, targeting to and insertion into the peroxisomal membrane, and stabilization within the lipid bilayer. The peroxin Pex19p has been proposed to be either the receptor that recognizes and targets newly synthesized peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMP) to the peroxisome or a chaperone required for stabilization of PMPs at the peroxisomal membrane. Differentiating between these two roles for Pex19p could be achieved by determining whether the peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS) and the region of Pex19p binding of a PMP are the same or different. We addressed the role for Pex19p in the assembly of two PMPs, Pex30p and Pex32p, of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pex30p and Pex32p control peroxisome size and number but are dispensable for peroxisome formation. Systematic truncations from the carboxyl terminus, together with in-frame deletions of specific regions, have identified PTSs essential for targeting Pex30p and Pex32p to peroxisomes. Both Pex30p and Pex32p interact with Pex19p in regions that do not overlap with their PTSs. However, Pex19p is required for localizing Pex30p and Pex32p to peroxisomes, because mutations that disrupt the interaction of Pex19p with Pex30p and Pex32p lead to their mislocalization to a compartment other than peroxisomes. Mutants of Pex30p and Pex32p that localize to peroxisomes but produce cells exhibiting the peroxisomal phenotypes of cells lacking these proteins demonstrate that the regions in these proteins that control peroxisomal targeting and cell biological activity are separable. Together, our data show that the interaction of Pex19p with Pex30p and Pex32p is required for their roles in peroxisome biogenesis and are consistent with a chaperone role for Pex19p in stabilizing or maintaining membrane proteins in peroxisomes.     

Sorting pathway and molecular targeting signals for the Arabidopsis peroxin 3

Peroxin 3 (Pex3p) has been identified and characterized as a peroxisomal membrane protein in yeasts and mammals. We identified two putative homologs in Arabidopsis (AtPex3p, forms 1 and 2), both with an identical cluster of positively charged amino acid residues (RKHRRK) immediately preceding one of the two predicted transmembrane domains (TMD1). In transiently transformed Arabidopsis and tobacco BY-2 suspension-cultured cells, epitope-tagged AtPex3p (form 2) sorted post-translationally from the cytosol directly to peroxisomes, the first sorting pathway described for any peroxin in plants. TMD1 and RKHRRK were necessary for targeting form 2 to peroxisomes and sufficient for directing chloramphenicol acetyltransferase to peroxisomes in both cell types. The N and C termini of AtPex3p (form 2) extend into the peroxisomal matrix, different from mammal and yeast Pex3 proteins. Thus, two authentic peroxisomal membrane-bound Pex3p homologs possessing a membrane peroxisomal targeting signal, the first one defined for a plant peroxin and for any Pex3p homolog, exist in plant cells.     

Targeting of hFis1 to peroxisomes is mediated by Pex19p

The processes of peroxisome formation and proliferation are still a matter of debate. We have previously shown that peroxisomes share some components of their division machinery with mitochondria. hFis1, a tail-anchored membrane protein, regulates the membrane fission of both organelles by DLP1/Drp1 recruitment, but nothing is known about the mechanisms of the dual targeting of hFis1. Here we demonstrate for the first time that peroxisomal targeting of hFis1 depends on Pex19p, a peroxisomal membrane protein import factor. hFis1/Pex19p binding was demonstrated by expression and co-immunoprecipitation studies. Using mutated versions of hFis1 an essential binding region for Pex19p was located within the last 26 C-terminal amino acids of hFis1, which are required for proper targeting to both mitochondria and peroxisomes. The basic amino acids in the very C terminus are not essential for Pex19p binding and peroxisomal targeting, but are instead required for mitochondrial targeting. Silencing of Pex19p by small interference RNA reduced the targeting of hFis1 to peroxisomes, but not to mitochondria. In contrast, overexpression of Pex19p alone was not sufficient to shift the targeting of hFis1 to peroxisomes. Our findings indicate that targeting of hFis1 to peroxisomes and mitochondria are independent events and support a direct, Pex19p-dependent targeting of peroxisomal tail-anchored proteins.     

The dynamin-like protein Vps1p of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae associates with peroxisomes in a Pex19p-dependent manner

Dynamins and dynamin-like proteins play important roles in organelle division. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the dynamin-like protein Vps1p (vacuolar protein sorting protein 1) is involved in peroxisome fission, as cells deleted for the VPS1 gene contain reduced numbers of enlarged peroxisomes. What relationship Vps1p has with peroxisomes remains unclear. Here we show that Vps1p interacts with Pex19p, a peroxin that acts as a shuttling receptor for peroxisomal membrane proteins or as a chaperone assisting the assembly/stabilization of proteins at the peroxisome membrane. Vps1p contains two putative Pex19p recognition sequences at amino acids 509-523 and 633-647. Deletion of the first (but not the second) sequence results in reduced numbers of enlarged peroxisomes in cells, as in vps1delta cells. Deletion of either sequence has no effect on vacuolar morphology or vacuolar protein sorting, suggesting that the peroxisome and vacuole biogenic functions of Vps1p are separate and separable. Substitution of proline for valine at position 516 of Vps1p abrogates Pex19p binding and gives the peroxisome phenotype of vps1delta cells. Microscopic analysis showed that overexpression of Pex19p or redirection of Pex19p to the nucleus does not affect the normal cellular distribution of Vps1p in the cytosol and in punctate structures that are not peroxisomes, suggesting that Pex19p does not function in targeting Vps1p to peroxisomes. Subcellular fractionation showed that a fraction of Vps1p is associated with peroxisomes and that deletion or mutation of the first Pex19p recognition sequence abrogates this association. Our results are consistent with Pex19p acting as a chaperone to stabilize the association of Vps1p with peroxisomes and not as a receptor involved in targeting Vps1p to peroxisomes.     

The import competence of a peroxisomal membrane protein is determined by Pex19p before the docking step

Biogenesis of the mammalian peroxisomal membrane requires the action of Pex3p and Pex16p, two proteins present in the organelle membrane, and Pex19p, a protein that displays a dual subcellular distribution (peroxisomal and cytosolic). Pex19p interacts with most peroxisomal intrinsic membrane proteins, but whether this property reflects its role as an import receptor for this class of proteins or a chaperone-like function in the assembly/disassembly of peroxisomal membrane proteins has been the subject of much controversy. Here, we describe an in vitro system particularly suited to address this issue. It is shown that insertion of a reporter protein into the peroxisomal membrane is a Pex3p-dependent process that does not require ATP/GTP hydrolysis. The system can be programmed with recombinant versions of Pex19p, allowing us to demonstrate that Pex19p-cargo protein complexes formed in the absence of peroxisomes are the substrates for the peroxisomal docking/insertion machinery. Data suggesting that cargo-loaded Pex19p displays a much higher affinity for Pex3p than Pex19p alone are also provided. These results suggest that soluble Pex19p participates in the targeting of newly synthesized peroxisomal membrane proteins to the organelle membrane and support the existence of a cargo-induced peroxisomal targeting mechanism for Pex19p.     

Role of Pex19p in the targeting of PMP70 to peroxisome

Pex19p is a protein required for the peroxisomal membrane synthesis. The 70-kDa peroxisomal membrane protein (PMP70) is synthesized on free cytosolic ribosomes and then inserted posttranslationally into peroxisomal membranes. Pex19p has been shown to play an important role in this process. Using an in vitro translation system, we investigated the role of Pex19p as a chaperone and identified the regions of PMP70 required for the interaction with Pex19p. When PMP70 was translated in the presence of purified Pex19p, a large part of PMP70 existed as soluble form and was co-immunoprecipitated with Pex19p. However, in the absence of Pex19p, PMP70 formed aggregates during translation. To identify the regions that interact with Pex19p, various truncated PMP70 were translated in the presence of Pex19p and subjected to co-immunoprecipitation. The interaction was markedly reduced by the deletion of the NH(2)-terminal 61 amino acids or the region around TMD6. Further, we expressed these deletion constructs of PMP70 in fusion with the green fluorescent protein in CHO cells. Fusion proteins lacking these Pex19p binding sites did not display any peroxisomal localization. These results suggest that Pex19p binds to PMP70 co-translationally and keeps PMP70 as a proper conformation for the localization to peroxisome.     

The N terminus of the peroxisomal cycling receptor, Pex5p, is required for redirecting the peroxisome-associated peroxin back to the cytosol

Most newly synthesized peroxisomal matrix proteins are transported to the organelle by Pex5p, a remarkable multidomain protein involved in an intricate network of transient protein-protein interactions. Presently, our knowledge regarding the structure/function of amino acid residues 118 to the very last residue of mammalian Pex5p is quite vast. Indeed, the cargo-protein receptor domain as well as the binding sites for several peroxins have all been mapped to this region of Pex5p. In contrast, structural/functional data regarding the first 117 amino acid residues of Pex5p are still scarce. Here we show that a truncated Pex5p lacking the first 110 amino acid residues (DeltaN110-Pex5p) displays exactly the peroxisomal import properties of the full-length peroxin implying that this N-terminal domain is involved neither in cargo-protein binding nor in the docking/translocation step of the Pex5p-cargo protein complex at the peroxisomal membrane. However, the ATP-dependent export step of DeltaN110-Pex5p from the peroxisomal membrane is completely blocked, a phenomenon that was also observed for a Pex5p version lacking just the first 17 amino acid residues but not for a truncated protein comprising amino acid residues 1-324 of Pex5p. By exploring the unique properties of DeltaN110-Pex5p, the effect of temperature on the import/export kinetics of Pex5p was characterized. Our data indicate that the export step of Pex5p from the peroxisomal compartment (in contrast with its insertion into the organelle membrane) is highly dependent on the temperature.     

Pex19p-dependent targeting of Pex17p, a peripheral component of the peroxisomal protein import machinery

Pex19p is required for the topogenesis of peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs). Here we have demonstrated that Pex19p is also required for the peroxisomal targeting and stability of Pex17p, a peripheral component of the docking complex of the peroxisomal protein import machinery. We have demonstrated that Pex17p is associated with the peroxisomal Pex13p-Pex14p complex as well as with Pex19p. We have identified the corresponding binding sites for Pex14p and Pex19p and demonstrated that a specific loss of the Pex19p interaction resulted in mistargeting of Pex17p. We have shown that a construct consisting only of the Pex19p- and Pex14p-binding sites of Pex17p is sufficient to direct an otherwise cytosolic reporter protein to the peroxisomal membrane in a Pex19p-dependent manner. Our data show that the function of Pex19p as chaperone or import receptor is not restricted to integral membrane proteins but may also include peripheral PMPs. As a consequence of our data, the previous definition of a targeting signal for PMPs (mPTS) as a Pex19p-binding motif in conjunction with a transmembrane segment should be extended to regions comprising a Pex19p-binding motif and a peroxisomal anchor sequence.     

Structural basis for competitive interactions of Pex14 with the import receptors Pex5 and Pex19

Protein import into peroxisomes depends on a complex and dynamic network of protein–protein interactions. Pex14 is a central component of the peroxisomal import machinery and binds the soluble receptors Pex5 and Pex19, which have important function in the assembly of peroxisome matrix and membrane, respectively. We show that the N‐terminal domain of Pex14, Pex14(N), adopts a three‐helical fold. Pex5 and Pex19 ligand helices bind competitively to the same surface in Pex14(N) albeit with opposite directionality. The molecular recognition involves conserved aromatic side chains in the Pex5 WxxxF/Y motif and a newly identified F/YFxxxF sequence in Pex19. The Pex14–Pex5 complex structure reveals molecular details for a critical interaction in docking Pex5 to the peroxisomal membrane. We show that mutations of Pex14 residues located in the Pex5/Pex19 binding region disrupt Pex5 and/or Pex19 binding in vitro. The corresponding full‐length Pex14 variants are impaired in peroxisomal membrane localisation in vivo, showing that the molecular interactions mediated by the N‐terminal domain modulate peroxisomal targeting of Pex14.     

The type-2 peroxisomal targeting signal

The type-2 peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS2) is one of two peptide motifs destining soluble proteins for peroxisomes. This signal acts as amphiphilic α-helix exposing the side chains of all conserved residues to the same side. PTS2 motifs are recognized by a bipartite protein complex consisting of the receptor PEX7 and a co-receptor. Cargo-loaded receptor complexes are translocated across the peroxisomal membrane by a transient pore and inside peroxisomes, cargo proteins are released and processed in many, but not all species. The components of the bipartite receptor are re-exported into the cytosol by a ubiquitin-mediated and ATP-driven export mechanism. Structurally, PTS2 motifs resemble other N-terminal targeting signals, whereas the functional relation to the second peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS1) is unclear. Although only a few PTS2-carrying proteins are known in humans, subjects lacking a functional import mechanism for these proteins suffer from the severe inherited disease rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata.     

Characterization of the targeting signal of the Arabidopsis 22-kD integral peroxisomal membrane protein

Using a combination of in vivo and in vitro assays, we characterized the sorting pathway and molecular targeting signal for the Arabidopsis 22-kD peroxisome membrane protein (PMP22), an integral component of the membrane of all peroxisomes in the mature plant. We show that nascent PMP22 is sorted directly from the cytosol to peroxisomes and that it is inserted into the peroxisomal boundary membrane with its N- and C-termini facing the cytosol. This direct sorting of PMP22 to peroxisomes contrasts with the indirect sorting reported previously for cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum) ascorbate peroxidase, an integral PMP that sorts to peroxisomes via a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus, at least two different sorting pathways for PMPs exist in plant cells. At least four distinct regions within the N-terminal one-half of PMP22, including a positively charged domain present in most peroxisomal integral membrane-destined proteins, functions in a cooperative manner in efficient peroxisomal targeting and insertion. In addition, targeting with high fidelity to peroxisomes requires all four membrane-spanning domains in PMP22. Together, these results illustrate that the PMP22 membrane peroxisomal targeting signal is complex and that different elements within the signal may be responsible for mediating unique aspects of PMP22 biogenesis, including maintaining the solubility before membrane insertion, targeting to peroxisomes, and ensuring proper assembly in the peroxisomal boundary membrane.     

Pex3p initiates the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment from a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Peroxisomes are dynamic organelles that often proliferate in response to compounds that they metabolize. Peroxisomes can proliferate by two apparent mechanisms, division of preexisting peroxisomes and de novo synthesis of peroxisomes. Evidence for de novo peroxisome synthesis comes from studies of cells lacking the peroxisomal integral membrane peroxin Pex3p. These cells lack peroxisomes, but peroxisomes can assemble upon reintroduction of Pex3p. The source of these peroxisomes has been the subject of debate. Here, we show that the amino-terminal 46 amino acids of Pex3p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae target to a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum and initiate the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment for de novo peroxisome synthesis. In vivo video microscopy showed that this preperoxisomal compartment can import both peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins leading to the formation of bona fide peroxisomes through the continued activity of full-length Pex3p. Peroxisome formation from the preperoxisomal compartment depends on the activity of the genes PEX14 and PEX19, which are required for the targeting of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins, respectively. Our findings support a direct role for the endoplasmic reticulum in de novo peroxisome formation.     

Recruiting mechanism of the AAA peroxins, Pex1p and Pex6p, to Pex26p on the peroxisomal membrane

A peroxisomal C-tail-anchored type-II membrane protein, Pex26p, recruits AAA ATPase Pex1p-Pex6p complexes to peroxisomes. We herein attempted to gain mechanistic insight into Pex26p function. Pex26pΔ33-40 truncated in amino-acid residues at 33-40 abolishes the recruiting of Pex1p-Pex6p complex to peroxisomes and fails to complement the impaired phenotype of pex26 CHO cell mutant ZP167, thereby suggesting that peroxisomal localization of Pex1p and Pex6p is indispensable for the transport of matrix proteins. In in vitro transport assay using semipermeabilized CHO cells, Pex1p is targeted to peroxisomes in a manner dependent on ATP hydrolysis, while Pex6p targeting requires ATP but not its hydrolysis. This finding is confirmed by the assay using Walker-motif mutants. Transport of Pex1p and Pex6p is temperature-dependent. In vitro binding assays with glutathione-S-transferase-fused Pex26p, Pex1p and Pex6p bind to Pex26p in a manner dependent on ATP binding but not ATP hydrolysis. These results suggest that ATP hydrolysis is required for stable localization of Pex1p to peroxisomes, but not for binding to Pex26p. Moreover, Pex1p and Pex6p are altered to a more compact conformation upon binding to ATP, as verified by limited proteolysis. Taken together, Pex1p and Pex6p are most likely regulated in their peroxisomal localization onto Pex26p via conformational changes by the ATPase cycle.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex3p and pex19p are required for proper localization and stability of peroxisomal membrane proteins

The mechanisms by which peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs) are targeted to and inserted into membranes are unknown, as are the required components. We show that among a collection of 16 Saccharomyces cerevisiae peroxisome biogenesis (pex) mutants, two mutants, pex3Delta and pex19Delta, completely lack detectable peroxisomal membrane structures and mislocalize their PMPs to the cytosol where they are rapidly degraded. The other pexDelta mutants contain membrane structures that are properly inherited during vegetative growth and that house multiple PMPs. Even Pex15p requires Pex3p and Pex19p for localization to peroxisomal membranes. This PMP was previously hypothesized to travel via the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to peroxisomes. We provide evidence that ER-accumulated Pex15p is not a sorting intermediate on its way to peroxisomes. Our results show that Pex3p and Pex19p are required for the proper localization of all PMPs tested, including Pex15p, whereas the other Pex proteins might only be required for targeting/import of matrix proteins.     

Functional domains and dynamic assembly of the peroxin Pex14p, the entry site of matrix proteins

The 41-kDa membrane-anchored peroxin Pex14p functions as the peroxisome targeting signal (PTS) receptor-mediated, initial import site for matrix proteins. We here identify the functional domains of Pex14p involved in the assembly of import site subcomplexes. The minimal region of Pex14p required for restoring impaired protein import in pex14 Chinese hamster ovary cell mutant lies at residues 21-260 in the primary sequence. A highly conserved N-terminal region, encompassing residues 21-70, interacts with the PTS1 receptor Pex5p, Pex13p, and Pex19p that is essential for membrane biogenesis. N-terminal residues 21-140, including a hydrophobic segment at 110-138, function as a topogenic sequence. Site-directed mutagenesis, size fractionation, and chemical cross-linking analyses demonstrate that the coiled-coil domain at residues 156-197 regulates homodimerization of Pex14p. Moreover, AXXXA and GXXXG motifs in the transmembrane segment mediate homomeric oligomerization of Pex14p, giving rise to assembly of high molecular mass complexes and thereby assuring Pex13p-dependent localization of Pex14p to peroxisomes. Pex5p, Pex13p, and Pex19p bind to Pex14p homo-oligomers with different molecular masses, whereas cargo-unloaded Pex5p apparently disassembles Pex14p homo-oligomers. Thus, Pex14p most likely forms several distinct peroxin complexes involved in peroxisomal matrix protein import.     

Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal targeting signal type 1 receptor, Pex5p, suggests the presence of a quality control mechanism during peroxisomal matrix protein import

PEX genes encode proteins (peroxins) that are required for the biogenesis of peroxisomes. One of these peroxins, Pex5p, is the receptor for matrix proteins with a type 1 peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS1), which shuttles newly synthesized proteins from the cytosol into the peroxisome matrix. We observed that in various Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex mutants disturbed in the early stages of PTS1 import, the steady-state levels of Pex5p are enhanced relative to wild type controls. Furthermore, we identified ubiquitinated forms of Pex5p in deletion mutants of those PEX genes that have been implicated in recycling of Pex5p from the peroxisomal membrane into the cytosol. Pex5p ubiquitination required the presence of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc4p and the peroxins that are required during early stages of PTS1 protein import. Finally, we provide evidence that the proteasome is involved in the turnover of Pex5p in wild type yeast cells, a process that requires Ubc4p and occurs at the peroxisomal membrane. Our data suggest that during receptor recycling a portion of Pex5p becomes ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome. We propose that this process represents a conserved quality control mechanism in peroxisome biogenesis.     

Yarrowia lipolytica Cells Mutant for the Peroxisomal Peroxin Pex19p Contain Structures Resembling Wild-Type Peroxisomes

PEX genes encode peroxins, which are proteins required for peroxisome assembly. The PEX19 gene of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica was isolated by functional complementation of the oleic acid-nonutilizing strain pex19-1 and encodes Pex19p, a protein of 324 amino acids (34,822 Da). Subcellular fractionation and immunofluorescence microscopy showed Pex19p to be localized primarily to peroxisomes. Pex19p is detected in cells grown in glucose-containing medium, and its levels are not increased by incubation of cells in oleic acid-containing medium, the metabolism of which requires intact peroxisomes. pex19 cells preferentially mislocalize peroxisomal matrix proteins and the peripheral intraperoxisomal membrane peroxin Pex16p to the cytosol, although small amounts of these proteins could be reproducibly localized to a subcellular fraction enriched for peroxisomes. In contrast, the peroxisomal integral membrane protein Pex2p exhibits greatly reduced levels in pex19 cells compared with its levels in wild-type cells. Importantly, pex19 cells were shown by electron microscopy to contain structures that resemble wild-type peroxisomes in regards to size, shape, number, and electron density. Subcellular fractionation and isopycnic density gradient centrifugation confirmed the presence of vesicular structures in pex19 mutant strains that were similar in density to wild-type peroxisomes and that contained profiles of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins that are similar to, yet distinct from, those of wild-type peroxisomes. Because peroxisomal structures form in pex19 cells, Pex19p apparently does not function as a peroxisomal membrane protein receptor in Y. lipolytica. Our results are consistent with a role for Y. lipolytica Pex19p in stabilizing the peroxisomal membrane.     

The peroxisomal membrane protein import receptor Pex3p is directly transported to peroxisomes by a novel Pex19p- and Pex16p-dependent pathway

Two distinct pathways have recently been proposed for the import of peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs): a Pex19p- and Pex3p-dependent class I pathway and a Pex19p- and Pex3p-independent class II pathway. We show here that Pex19p plays an essential role as the chaperone for full-length Pex3p in the cytosol. Pex19p forms a soluble complex with newly synthesized Pex3p in the cytosol and directly translocates it to peroxisomes. Knockdown of Pex19p inhibits peroxisomal targeting of newly synthesized full-length Pex3p and results in failure of the peroxisomal localization of Pex3p. Moreover, we demonstrate that Pex16p functions as the Pex3p-docking site and serves as the peroxisomal membrane receptor that is specific to the Pex3p–Pex19p complexes. Based on these novel findings, we suggest a model for the import of PMPs that provides new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the biogenesis of peroxisomes and its regulation involving Pex3p, Pex19p, and Pex16p.     

Insights into the Role of the Peroxisomal Ubiquitination Machinery in Pex13p Degradation in the Yeast Hansenula polymorpha

The import of matrix proteins into peroxisomes in yeast requires the action of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Pex4p and a complex consisting of the ubiquitin E3 ligases Pex2p, Pex10p and Pex12p. Together, this peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery is thought to ubiquitinate the cycling receptor protein Pex5p and members of the Pex20p family of co-receptors, a modification that is required for receptor recycling. However, recent reports have demonstrated that this machinery plays a role in additional peroxisome-associated processes. Hence, our understanding of the function of these proteins in peroxisome biology is still incomplete. Here, we identify a role for the peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery in the degradation of the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p. Our data demonstrate that Pex13p levels build up in cells lacking members of this machinery and also establish that Pex13p undergoes rapid degradation in wild-type cells. Furthermore, we show that Pex13p is ubiquitinated in wild-type cells and also establish that Pex13p ubiquitination is reduced in cells lacking a functional peroxisomal E3 ligase complex. Finally, deletion of PEX2 causes Pex13p to build up at the peroxisomal membrane. Taken together, our data provide further evidence that the role of the peroxisomal ubiquitination machinery in peroxisome biology goes much deeper than receptor recycling alone.     

An internal region of the peroxisomal membrane protein PMP47 is essential for sorting to peroxisomes

Targeting sequences on peroxisomal membrane proteins have not yet been identified. We have attempted to find such a sequence within PMP47, a protein of the methylotrophic yeast, Candida boidinii. This protein of 423 amino acids shows sequence similarity with proteins in the family of mitochondrial carrier proteins. As such, it is predicted to have six membrane-spanning domains. Protease susceptibility experiments are consistent with a six-membrane-spanning model for PMP47, although the topology for the peroxisomal protein is inverted compared with the mitochondrial carrier proteins. PMP47 contains two potential peroxisomal targeting sequences (PTS1), an internal SKL (residues 320- 322) and a carboxy terminal AKE (residues 421-423). Using a heterologous in vivo sorting system, we show that efficient sorting occurs in the absence of both sequences. Analysis of PMP47- dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) fusion proteins revealed that amino acids 1-199 of PMP47, which contain the first three putative membrane spans, do not contain the necessary targeting information, whereas a fusion with amino acids 1-267, which contains five spans, is fully competent for sorting to peroxisomes. Similarly, a DHFR fusion construct containing residues 268-423 did not target to peroxisomes while residues 203-420 appeared to sort to that organelle, albeit at lower efficiency than the 1-267 construct. However, DHFR constructs containing only amino acids 185-267 or 203-267 of PMP47 were not found to be associated with peroxisomes. We conclude that amino acids 199-267 are necessary for peroxisomal targeting, although additional sequences may be required for efficient sorting to, or retention by, the organelles.