In vitro Transcription of Kinetoplast and Nuclear DNA in Kinetoplastida*†

SYNOPSIS. DNA-dependent RNA polymerases have been solubilized from homogenates of Crithidia fasciculata using gentle extraction procedures. RNA polymerase I and II are separated on DEAE cellulose at 0.07M (NH₄)₂SO₄ and 0.13M (NH₄)₂SO₄ respectively. RNA polymerase II is inhibited 80% by α-amanitin (25 μg/ml). Both RNA polymerases require DNA as a template, ribonucleoside triphosphates and Mn²⁺. The synthesis of RNA as a product is inhibited by DNase. RNase, pronase and actinomycin D. Purified kinetoplast and nuclear DNA can serve as templates for the RNA polymerases. Denatured DNA templates are preferred. The synthesis of RNA continues for at least an hour and is inhibited by trypanocidal drugs including suramin. antrycide, acriflavine, ethidium bromide and berenil. Complementary RNA synthesized in vitro from C. fasciculata kinetoplast DNA hybridizes with C. fasciculata kinetoplast DNA but not with C. fasciculata nuclear DNA or Blastocrithidia culicis kinetoplast DNA, Escherichia coli, T4 or calf thymus DNAs. The complementary RNA synthesized in vitro from C.fasciculata kinetoplast DNA sediments at 4–5S.     

抗菌肽P7抑制大肠杆菌的非膜作用机制北大核心CSCD

【目的】研究抗菌肽P7抑制大肠杆菌的非膜作用机制。【方法】P7与溴化乙锭竞争结合大肠杆菌基因组DNA的荧光光谱,分析P7与DNA的结合方式;流式细胞术分析P7与大肠杆菌基因组DNA结合对细菌细胞周期的影响;采用磁珠富集和PCR扩增相结合的方法分析P7特异结合的DNA序列;通过实时荧光定量PCR分析P7对大肠杆菌DNA复制和SOS损伤修复基因表达的影响;核酸染料的荧光分析研究P7对大肠杆菌DNA和RNA合成的影响。【结果】P7以嵌插的方式作用于大肠杆菌基因组DNA碱基对并形成肽-DNA复合物,使溴化乙锭-DNA复合体系的荧光强度减弱。P7可以显著增加大肠杆菌细胞周期中S期细胞数目,抑制大肠杆菌DNA复制。P7特异性结合rnh A使该基因表达水平显著下调2.24倍。同时,在肽的影响下参与大肠杆菌DNA复制相关的ssb、dna G、lig B和rnh A基因的表达水平显著下调(P<0.05),DNA损伤修复的rec A和rec N基因显著上调(P<0.05)。P7可降低大肠杆菌DNA和RNA的合成。【结论】P7特异性地结合rnh A序列引起大肠杆菌DNA的损伤并抑制大肠杆菌的DNA复制。在P7的影响下,参与大肠杆菌DNA复制相关的基因的表达水平下调,DNA损伤修复基因显著上调,同时抑制大肠杆菌DNA和RNA的合成。     

Discrimination of promoters by <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacillus subtilis</Emphasis> RNA polymerase σ<Superscript>A</Superscript> and σ<Superscript>H</Superscript> holoenzymes is associated with periodic patterns in promoter nucleotide sequences

Bacillus subtilis promoters recognized by σ^A and σ^H RNA polymerases were found to have different periodic patterns of nucleotide disposition. Using a special version of Fourier analysis for symbolic sequences, Fourier spectra were obtained for the primary structure of promoters used by the two holoenzymes. Stepwise discriminant analysis with jackknife testing was performed for two promoter data sets (small and large). Based on the spectral patterns of the nucleotide sequences, the data sets could be sorted with 100% accuracy into two classes: promoters recognized by Eσ^A and by Eσ^H. Correlations were obtained between the promoter strength and the characteristics of their Fourier spectra. Moreover, perfect separation was achieved even when the “consensus” ?35 and ?10 sites were replaced by sequences of “blank symbols.” Thus, the periodicity in nucleotide distribution along the DNA chain is itself an attribute sufficient for selective recognition of the cognate promoter by RNA polymerase.     

A combined in vitro / in vivo selection for polymerases with novel promoter specificities

Background  

The DNA-dependent RNA polymerase from T7 bacteriophage (T7 RNAP) has been extensively characterized, and like other phage RNA polymerases it is highly specific for its promoter. A combined in vitro / in vivo selection method has been developed for the evolution of T7 RNA polymerases with altered promoter specificities. Large (10³ – 10⁶) polymerase libraries were made and cloned downstream of variant promoters. Those polymerase variants that can recognize variant promoters self-amplify both themselves and their attendent mRNAs in vivo. Following RT / PCR amplification in vitro, the most numerous polymerase genes are preferentially cloned and carried into subsequent rounds of selection.     

Analysis of the gene encoding the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II in Drosophila

Summary We have characterized RpII215, the gene encoding the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II in Drosophila melanogaster. DNA sequencing and nuclease S1 analyses provided the primary structure of this gene, its 7 kb RNA and 215 kDa protein products. The amino-terminal 80% of the subunit harbors regions with strong homology to the subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and to the largest subunits of other eukaryotic RNA polymerases. The carboxyl-terminal 20% of the subunit is composed of multiple repeats of a seven amino acid consensus sequence, Tyr-Ser-Pro-Thr-Ser-Pro-Ser. The homology domains, as well as the unique carboxyl-terminal structure, are considered in the light of current knowledge of RNA polymerase II and the properties of its largest subunit. Additionally, germline transformation demonstrated that a 9.4 kb genomic DNA segment containing the -amanitinresistant allele, RpII215 ^C4 , includes all sequences required to produce amanitin-resistant transformants.     

Small repeated sequences in the chloroplast genome of Chlamydomonas reinhardi

Summary Chloroplast DNA of Chlamydomonas reinhardi contains many inverted repeated sequences. Analysis by hydroxyapatite binding, S1 nuclease digestion, and electron microscopy indicates that these sequences are 0.1–0.3 kilobase pairs in length, are widely distributed in the chloroplast genome, and make up 4–7% of the chloroplast DNA.Abbreviations RNA ribonucleic acid - rRNA ribosomal RNA - RNA complementary RNA - DNA deoxyribonucleic acid - chl DNA chloroplast DNA - HAP hydroxypatite - SSC 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate - 0.1xSSC, 2xSSC, 4.67xSSC 0.1, 2, and 4.67 times the concentration of SSC, respectively - TCA trichloroacetic acid - PB NaPO₄ buffer, pH 6.8 - Kb Kilobase - KbP Kilobase pair     

DNA lesions that block DNA replication are responsible for the dnaA induction caused by DNA damage

Summary The initiation protein DnaA of Escherichia coli regulates its own expression autogenously by binding to a 9 by consensus sequence, the dnaA box, between the promoters dnaAP1 and dnaAP2. In this study, we analysed dnaA regulation in relation to DNA damage and found dnaA expression to be inducible by DNA lesions that inhibit DNA replication. On the other hand, coding DNA lesions were not able to induce dnaA expression. These results suggest that an additional regulatory mechanism is involved in dnaA gene expression and that DnaA protein may play a role in cellular responses to DNA damage. Furthermore, they strongly suggest that in response to DNA replication inhibition by DNA damage, and enhanced (re)initiation capacity is induced by oriC.