The regulatory protein MucR binds to a short DNA region located upstream of the muc R coding region in Rhizobium meliloti

The Rhizobium meliloti MucR protein is known to regulate the biosynthesis of the two exopolysaccharides, succinoglycan and galactoglucan. The mucR gene was successfully overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21 cells by heat shock induction using a two-plasmid system. Cell extracts of the production strain contained about 20% of a polypeptide of 17?kDa apparent molecular mass, corresponding to the size expected for MucR. As shown by an electrophoretic mobility shift assay, these extracts were active in the specific retardation of a 219-bp DNA fragment including 134-bp of the non-coding region upstream of the mucR gene. Primer extension analysis showed that this DNA fragment was located within the transcribed region upstream of the mucR gene. Competition experiments revealed that a 44-bp sequence present within the 134-bp upstream of the mucR gene contained the MucR binding site. Although binding of MucR to this site exhibited a moderate dissociation constant of $K_{\rm d} \approx 1.4 \times10^{-7}$ M, the reaction was highly specific since fragments containing binding sites for the homologous Ros protein from Agrobacterium tumefaciens were not able to compete for MucR binding.     

Dissecting water binding sites at protein–protein interfaces: a lesson from the atomic structures in the Protein Data Bank

We dissect the protein–protein interfaces into water preservation (WP), water hydration (WH) and water dehydration (WD) sites by comparing the water-mediated hydrogen bonds (H-bond) in the bound and unbound states of the interacting subunits. Upon subunit complexation, if a H-bond between an interface water and a protein polar group is retained, we assign it as WP site; if it is lost, we assign it as WD site and if a new H-bond is created, we assign it as WH site. We find that the density of WD sites is highest followed by WH and WP sites except in antigen and (or) antibody complexes, where the density of WH sites is highest followed by WD and WP sites. Furthermore, we find that WP sites are the most conserved followed by WD and WH sites in all class of complexes except in antigen and (or) antibody complexes, where WD sites are the most conserved followed by WH and WP sites. A significant number of WP and WH sites are involved in water bridges that stabilize the subunit interactions. At WH sites, the residues involved in water bridges are significantly better conserved than the other residues. However, no such difference is observed at WP sites. Interestingly, WD sites are generally replaced with direct H-bonds upon subunit complexation. Significantly, we observe many water-mediated H-bonds remain preserved in spite of large conformational changes upon subunit complexation. These findings have implications in predicting and engineering water binding sites at protein–protein interfaces.     

Crystal structure of the N-terminal region of human Topoisomerase IIβ binding protein 1

Human DNA Topoisomerase IIβ binding protein 1 (TopBP1) is a modulating protein that plays an essential role in the response to DNA damage. The N-terminal region of TopBP1, which contains predicted BRCA1-carboxy terminal (BRCT) domains 1 and 2, binds to Rad9, a component of the cell cycle checkpoint clamp Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 complex. Here, we report the crystal structure of the TopBP1 N-terminal region (residues 1-290) at 2.4 Å resolution. Interestingly, in addition to the predicted tandem BRCT1-2 repeats (residues 103-284), residues 7-98 form a previously unreported BRCT domain (here, BRCT0). In contrast to both BRCT1 and BRCT2, which possess the conventional phosphopeptide binding residues within a surface pocket, the corresponding pocket in BRCT0 is largely hydrophobic. Structural comparisons together with peptide binding studies indicate that the tandem BRCT1-2 domains are the binding region for phosphorylated Ser387 in Rad9.     

The relation of protein binding to function: what is the significance of munc18 and synaptotagmin binding to syntaxin 1, and where are the corresponding binding sites?

The Q-SNARE syntaxin 1 is a central component of the synaptic membrane fusion machinery. Syntaxin probably interacts with multiple proteins during synaptic vesicle exocytosis. In vitro, the tightest binding partners for syntaxin 1 are other SNAREs (synaptobrevin/VAMP and SNAP-25) and munc18-1 (also known as rbsec1/nsec1). Recent studies on Drosophila syntaxin led to the surprising finding that a syntaxin mutant which does not bind the munc18-homolog Rop nevertheless functionally substitutes for wild-type syntaxin in membrane fusion (Wu et al., Neuron 23, 593-605, 1999). This observation suggested that syntaxin 1 binding to munc18-1 is not essential for fusion, a puzzling conclusion in view of the tight binding of munc18 and syntaxin homologs in all organisms. To address this issue, we have now reinvestigated the interaction of syntaxin with munc18 and Rop. We find that the syntaxin sequence that was mutated in the Drosophila studies is not essential for munc18/Rop binding, and that the mutant is in fact able to bind to munc18/Rop. Thus the fact that the mutant syntaxin rescues release cannot be used as an argument that munc18 binding is not essential. In addition to munc18 and SNAREs, several other proteins have been suggested to interact with various domains of syntaxin 1, notably the calcium-sensor synaptotagmin and the vesicle protein CSP. Our results confirm that the SNARE motif in syntaxin binds to synaptotagmin, but this interaction does not require the very C-terminus of the motif. Interestingly, binding of synaptotagmin appears to be decreased in the closed conformation of syntaxin. In contrast, no interaction of CSP with syntaxin was detected even under low-stringency conditions. Our data suggest 1., that assays measuring protein/protein interactions that involve syntaxin may be more difficult to evaluate than is often assumed because of the sticky nature of the proteins involved, and 2., that it is currently not possible to draw conclusions about the importance of the various interactions with the available data from Drosophila or vertebrates.     

Fragment of mRNA coding part complementary to region 1638–1650 of wheat 18S RNA functions as a translational enhancer

The possible involvement of 18S rRNA fragment 1638–1650, including basements of the helices h44 and h28, as well as nucleotides of the ribosomal decoding site in the cap-independent mode of the initiation of the translation of plant ribosomes is studied. This rRNA fragment is shown to be accessible for complementary interactions in the 40S ribosomal subunit. It is found that the sequence that is complementary to the 18S rRNA fragment 1638–1650 is able to enhance the efficiency of the reporter mRNA translation when placed just after the initiation codon. The obtained results indicate that, in the course of the cap-independent mode of the initiation of translation, complementary interactions can occur between the mRNA coding sequence and 18S rRNA fragment in the region of the ribosomal decoding site.     

Structure–function defects of the twinkle amino-terminal region in progressive external ophthalmoplegia

TWINKLE is a DNA helicase needed for mitochondrial DNA replication. In lower eukaryotes the protein also harbors a primase activity, which is lost from TWINKLE encoded by mammalian cells. Mutations in TWINKLE underlie autosomal dominant progressive external ophthalmoplegia (adPEO), a disorder associated with multiple deletions in the mtDNA. Four different adPEO-causing mutations (W315L, K319T, R334Q, and P335L) are located in the N-terminal domain of TWINKLE. The mutations cause a dramatic decrease in ATPase activity, which is partially overcome in the presence of single-stranded DNA. The mutated proteins have defects in DNA helicase activity and cannot support normal levels of DNA replication. To explain the phenotypes, we use a molecular model of TWINKLE based on sequence similarities with the phage T7 gene 4 protein. The four adPEO-causing mutations are located in a region required to bind single-stranded DNA. These mutations may therefore impair an essential element of the catalytic cycle in hexameric helicases, i.e. the interplay between single-stranded DNA binding and ATP hydrolysis.     

Can copper binding to the prion protein generate a misfolded form of the protein?

The native prion protein (PrP) has a two domain structure, with a globular folded α-helical C-terminal domain and a flexible extended N-terminal region. The latter can selectively bind Cu²⁺ via four His residues in the octarepeat (OR) region, as well as two sites (His96 and His111) outside this region. In the disease state, the folded C-terminal domain of PrP undergoes a conformational change, forming amorphous aggregates high in β-sheet content. Cu²⁺ bound to the ORs can be redox active and has been shown to induce cleavage within the OR region, a process requiring conserved Trp residues. Using computational modeling, we have observed that electron transfer from Trp residues to copper can be favorable. These models also reveal that an indole-based radical cation or Cu⁺ can initiate reactions leading to protein backbone cleavage. We have also demonstrated, by molecular dynamics simulations, that Cu²⁺ binding to the His96 and His111 residues in the remaining PrP N-terminal fragment can induce localized β-sheet structure, allowing us to suggest a potential mechanism for the initiation of β-sheet misfolding in the C-terminal domain by Cu²⁺.

Mapping of the binding sites involved in PSP94–CRISP-3 interaction by molecular dissection of the complex

Background

Human Prostate Secretory Protein of 94 amino acids (PSP94) has been shown to bind human CRISP-3 (cysteine-rich secretory protein 3) with very high affinity. CRISP-3 belongs to the CRISP family of proteins having a PR-1 (pathogenesis related protein 1) domain at its N-terminal and ion channel regulatory (ICR) domain at its C-terminal connected by a hinge region. Functional significance of this complex is not yet known.

Methods

In order to identify the residues and/or regions involved in PSP94–CRISP-3 interaction, site-directed mutagenesis was employed. Effect of the mutations on the interaction was studied by co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP).

Results

For PSP94, amino acids Y³, F⁴, P⁵⁶ and the C-terminal β-strand were found to be crucial for interacting with CRISP-3. A disulfide bond between the two domains of PSP94 (C³⁷A–C⁷³A) was also important for this interaction. In case of CRISP-3, the N-terminal domain alone could not maintain a strong interaction with PSP94 but it required presence of the hinge region and not the C-terminal domain. Apart from CRISP-3, CRISP-2 was also found to interact with human PSP94. Based on our findings the most likely model of PSP94–CRISP-3 complex has been proposed.

Conclusion

The terminal β-strands of PSP94 contact the first α-helix and the hinge region of CRISP-3.

General significance

Involvement of the hinge region of CRISPs in interaction with PSP94 may affect the domain movement of CRISPs essential for the ion-channel regulatory activity resulting in inhibition of this activity.     

What is the function of nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

In contrast to the previously held notion that nitrogen catabolite repression is primarily responsible for the ability of yeast cells to use good nitrogen sources in preference to poor ones, we demonstrate that this ability is probably the result of other control mechanisms, such as metabolite compartmentation. We suggest that nitrogen repression is functionally a long-term adaptation to changes in the nutritional environment of yeast cells.     

The RNA-binding protein Staufen1 impairs myogenic differentiation via a c-myc–dependent mechanism

Recent work has shown that Staufen1 plays key roles in skeletal muscle, yet little is known about its pattern of expression during embryonic and postnatal development. Here we first show that Staufen1 levels are abundant in mouse embryonic muscles and that its expression decreases thereafter, reaching low levels in mature muscles. A similar pattern of expression is seen as cultured myoblasts differentiate into myotubes. Muscle degeneration/regeneration experiments revealed that Staufen1 increases after cardiotoxin injection before returning to the low levels seen in mature muscles. We next prevented the decrease in Staufen1 during differentiation by generating stable C2C12 muscle cell lines overexpressing Staufen1. Cells overexpressing Staufen1 differentiated poorly, as evidenced by reductions in the differentiation and fusion indices and decreases in MyoD, myogenin, MEF2A, and MEF2C, independently of Staufen-mediated mRNA decay. However, levels of c-myc, a factor known to inhibit differentiation, were increased in C2C12 cells overexpressing Staufen1 through enhanced translation. By contrast, the knockdown of Staufen1 decreased c-myc levels in myoblasts. Collectively our results show that Staufen1 is highly expressed during early stages of differentiation/development and that it can impair differentiation by regulating c-myc, thereby highlighting the multifunctional role of Staufen1 in skeletal muscle cells.     

Structure of the Arabidopsis thaliana DCL4 DUF283 domain reveals a noncanonical double-stranded RNA-binding fold for protein–protein interaction

Dicer or Dicer-like (DCL) protein is a catalytic component involved in microRNA (miRNA) or small interference RNA (siRNA) processing pathway, whose fragment structures have been partially solved. However, the structure and function of the unique DUF283 domain within dicer is largely unknown. Here we report the first structure of the DUF283 domain from the Arabidopsis thaliana DCL4. The DUF283 domain adopts an α-β-β-β-α topology and resembles the structural similarity to the double-stranded RNA-binding domain. Notably, the N-terminal α helix of DUF283 runs cross over the C-terminal α helix orthogonally, therefore, N- and C-termini of DUF283 are in close proximity. Biochemical analysis shows that the DUF283 domain of DCL4 displays weak dsRNA binding affinity and specifically binds to double-stranded RNA-binding domain 1 (dsRBD1) of Arabidopsis DRB4, whereas the DUF283 domain of DCL1 specifically binds to dsRBD2 of Arabidopsis HYL1. These data suggest a potential functional role of the Arabidopsis DUF283 domain in target selection in small RNA processing.     

Estimation of binding parameters for the protein–protein interaction using a site-directed spin labeling and EPR spectroscopy

Sensitivity of the electron paramagnetic resonance (CW EPR) to molecular tumbling provides potential means for studying processes of molecular association. It uses spin-labeled macromolecules, whose CW EPR spectra may change upon binding to other macromolecules. When a spin-labeled molecule is mixed with its liganding partner, the EPR spectrum constitutes a linear combination of spectra of the bound and unbound ligand (as seen in our example of spin-labeled cytochrome c ₂ interacting with cytochrome bc ₁ complex). In principle, the fraction of each state can be extracted by the numerical decomposition of the spectrum; however, the accuracy of such decomposition may often be compromised by the lack of the spectrum of the fully bound ligand, imposed by the equilibrium nature of molecular association. To understand how this may affect the final estimation of the binding parameters, such as stoichiometry and affinity of the binding, a series of virtual titration experiments was conducted. Our non-linear regression analysis considered a case in which only a single class of binding sites exists, and a case in which classes of both specific and non-specific binding sites co-exist. The results indicate that in both models, the error due to the unknown admixture of the unbound ligand component in the EPR spectrum causes an overestimation of the bound fraction leading to the bias in the dissociation constant. At the same time, the stoichiometry of the binding remains relatively unaffected, which overall makes the decomposition of the EPR spectrum an attractive method for studying protein–protein interactions in equilibrium. Our theoretical treatment appears to be valid for any spectroscopic techniques dealing with overlapping spectra of free and bound component.     

Identification of residues involved in homodimer formation located within a β-strand region of the N-terminus of a Yeast G protein-coupled receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are members of a superfamily of cell surface signaling proteins that play critical roles in many physiological functions; malfunction of these proteins is associated with multiple diseases. Understanding the structure–function relationships of these proteins is important, therefore, for GPCR-based drug discovery. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae tridecapeptide pheromone α-factor receptor Ste2p has been studied as a model to explore the structure–function relationships of this important class of cell surface receptors. Although transmembrane domains of GPCRs have been examined extensively, the extracellular N-terminus and loop regions have received less attention. We have used substituted cysteine accessibility method to probe the solvent accessibility of single cysteine residues engineered to replace residues Gly20 through Gly33 of the N-terminus of Ste2p. Unexpectedly, our analyses revealed that the residues Ser22, Ile24, Tyr26, and Ser28 in the N-terminus were solvent inaccessible, whereas all other residues of the targeted region were solvent accessible. The periodicity of accessibility from residues Ser22–Ser28 is indicative of an underlying structure consistent with a β-strand that was predicted computationally in this region. Moreover, a number of these Cys-substituted Ste2p receptors (G20C, S22C, I24C, Y26C, S28C and Y30C) were found to form increased dimers compared to the Cys-less Ste2p. Based on these data, we propose that part of the N-terminus of Ste2p is structured and that this structure forms a dimer interface for Ste2p molecules. Dimerization mediated by the N-terminus was affected by ligand binding, indicating an unanticipated conformational change in the N-terminus upon receptor activation.     

Identification of residues involved in homodimer formation located within a β-strand region of the N-terminus of a Yeast G protein-coupled receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are members of a superfamily of cell surface signaling proteins that play critical roles in many physiological functions; malfunction of these proteins is associated with multiple diseases. Understanding the structure-function relationships of these proteins is important, therefore, for GPCR-based drug discovery. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae tridecapeptide pheromone α-factor receptor Ste2p has been studied as a model to explore the structure-function relationships of this important class of cell surface receptors. Although transmembrane domains of GPCRs have been examined extensively, the extracellular N-terminus and loop regions have received less attention. We have used substituted cysteine accessibility method to probe the solvent accessibility of single cysteine residues engineered to replace residues Gly20 through Gly33 of the N-terminus of Ste2p. Unexpectedly, our analyses revealed that the residues Ser22, Ile24, Tyr26, and Ser28 in the N-terminus were solvent inaccessible, whereas all other residues of the targeted region were solvent accessible. The periodicity of accessibility from residues Ser22-Ser28 is indicative of an underlying structure consistent with a β-strand that was predicted computationally in this region. Moreover, a number of these Cys-substituted Ste2p receptors (G20C, S22C, I24C, Y26C, S28C and Y30C) were found to form increased dimers compared to the Cys-less Ste2p. Based on these data, we propose that part of the N-terminus of Ste2p is structured and that this structure forms a dimer interface for Ste2p molecules. Dimerization mediated by the N-terminus was affected by ligand binding, indicating an unanticipated conformational change in the N-terminus upon receptor activation.     

Variation of protein binding cavity volume and ligand volume in protein–ligand complexes

We have systematically analyzed the variation of protein binding cavity volume of 200 protein–ligand complexes belonging to eight protein families. Wide variation in protein binding cavity volume for the same protein is observed on binding different ligands. Analysis of individual protein families shows high correlation between atom–atom interactions in binding site and ligand volume. This study implies the significance of protein flexibility in docking small molecule inhibitors on the basis of protein binding cavity volume with respect to ligand volume.     

Structure of a protein–detergent complex: the balance between detergent cohesion and binding

Despite the major interest in membrane proteins at functional, genomic, and therapeutic levels, their biochemical and structural study remains challenging, as they require, among other things, solubilization in detergent micelles. The complexity of this task derives from the dependence of membrane protein structure on their anisotropic environment, influenced by a delicate balance between many different physicochemical properties. To study such properties in a small protein–detergent complex, we used fluorescence measurements and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on the transmembrane part of glycophorin A (GpAtm) solubilized in micelles of dihexanoylphosphatidylcholine (DHPC) detergent. Fluorescence measurements show that DHPC has limited ability to solubilize the peptide, while MD provides a possible molecular explanation for this. We observe that the detergent molecules are balanced between two different types of interactions: cohesive interactions between detergent molecules that hold the micelle together, and adhesive interactions with the peptide. While the cohesive interactions are detergent mediated, the adhesion to the peptide depends on the specific interactions between the hydrophobic parts of the detergent and the topography of the peptide dictated by the amino acids. The balance between these two parameters results in a certain frustration of the system and rather slow equilibration. These observations suggest how molecular properties of detergents could influence membrane protein stabilization and solubilization.     

The function of plant PR1 and other members of the CAP protein superfamily in plant–pathogen interactions

The pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins of plants have originally been identified as proteins that are strongly induced upon biotic and abiotic stress. These proteins fall into 17 distinct classes (PR1–PR17). The mode of action of most of these PR proteins has been well characterized, except for PR1, which belongs to a widespread superfamily of proteins that share a common CAP domain. Proteins of this family are not only expressed in plants but also in humans and in many different pathogens, including phytopathogenic nematodes and fungi. These proteins are associated with a diverse range of physiological functions. However, their precise mode of action has remained elusive. The importance of these proteins in immune defence is illustrated by the fact that PR1 overexpression in plants results in increased resistance against pathogens. However, PR1-like CAP proteins are also produced by pathogens and deletion of these genes results in reduced virulence, suggesting that CAP proteins can exert both defensive and offensive functions. Recent progress has revealed that plant PR1 is proteolytically cleaved to release a C-terminal CAPE1 peptide, which is sufficient to activate an immune response. The release of this signalling peptide is blocked by pathogenic effectors to evade immune defence. Moreover, plant PR1 forms complexes with other PR family members, including PR5, also known as thaumatin, and PR14, a lipid transfer protein, to enhance the host's immune response. Here, we discuss possible functions of PR1 proteins and their interactors, particularly in light of the fact that these proteins can bind lipids, which have important immune signalling functions.