Evaluation of patient organ doses from kilovoltage cone-beam CT imaging in radiation therapy

BackgroundCurrently, CBCT system is an indispensable component of radiation therapy units. Because of that, it is important in treatment planning and diagnosis. CBCT is also an crucial tool for patient positioning and verification in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Therefore, it is critical to investigate the patient organ doses arising from CBCT imaging. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient organ doses and effective dose to patients from three different protocols of Elekta Synergy XVI system for kV CBCT imaging examinations in image guided radiation therapy.Materials and methodsOrgan dose measurements were done with thermoluminescent dosimeters in Alderson RA NDO male phantom for head & neck (H&N), chest and pelvis protocols of the Elekta Synergy XVI kV CBCT system. From the measured organ dose, effective dose to patients were calculated according to the International Commission on Radiological Protection 103 report recommendations.ResultsFor H&N, chest and pelvis scans, the organ doses were in the range of 0.03–3.43 mGy, 6.04–22.94 mGy and 2.5–25.28 mGy, respectively. The calculated effective doses were 0.25 mSv, 5.56 mSv and 4.72 mSv, respectively.ConclusionThe obtained results were consistent with the most published studies in the literature. Although the doses to patient organs from the kV CBCT system were relatively low when compared with the prescribed treatment dose, the amount of delivered dose should be monitored and recorded carefully in order to avoid secondary cancer risk, especially in pediatric examinations.     

Fetal radiation dose in three common CT examinations during pregnancy – Monte Carlo study

PurposeTo determine fetal doses in different stages of pregnancy in three common computed tomography (CT) examinations: pulmonary CT angiography, abdomino-pelvic and trauma scan with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.MethodsAn adult female anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with a 64-slice CT using pulmonary angiography, abdomino-pelvic and trauma CT scan protocols. Three different sized gelatin boluses placed on the phantom’s abdomen simulated different stages of pregnancy. Intrauterine dose was used as a surrogate to a dose absorbed to the fetus. MC simulations were performed to estimate uterine doses. The simulation dose levels were calibrated with volumetric CT dose index (CTDI_vol) measurements and MC simulations in a cylindrical CTDI body phantom and compared with ten point doses measured with metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect-transistor dosimeters. Intrauterine volumes and uterine walls were segmented and the respective dose volume histograms were calculated.ResultsThe mean intrauterine doses in different stages of pregnancy varied from 0.04 to 1.04 mGy, from 4.8 to 5.8 mGy, and from 9.8 to 12.6 mGy in the CT scans for pulmonary angiography, abdomino-pelvic and trauma CT scans, respectively. MC simulations showed good correlation with the MOSFET measurement at the measured locations.ConclusionsThe three studied examinations provided highly varying fetal doses increasing from sub-mGy level in pulmonary CT angiography to notably higher levels in abdomino-pelvic and trauma scans where the fetus is in the primary exposure range. Volumetric dose distribution offered by MC simulations in an appropriate anthropomorphic phantom provides a comprehensive dose assessment when applied in adjunct to point-dose measurements.     

Practical radiation dosimetry across a variety of CBCT devices in Radiology

Cone beam technology is becoming more prominent in Radiology. In our hospital we have an extremity CT, an O-arm and a number of C-arms offering 3D capabilities. Each of these modalities use cone beam CT (CBCT) technology to image the area of interest in one single rotation. Traditional CTDI metrics for radiation dosimetry in CT depend on narrow beam geometry. The relevance of the CTDI as a dose indicator for cone beam scanning is contentious due to underestimation of dose lying outside the standard 100 mm chamber length and CTDI phantoms being of insufficient length.In an attempt to better quantify dose from cone beam scanning, alternative methodologies have been developed which attempt to counter the limitations of CTDI methodologies. In this comparison study we utilised the CBCT methodologies outlined in (i) IAEA Report 5, (ii) EFOMP’s protocol on QC in CBCT and (iii) conventional CTDI measurement and tested them on various CBCT systems used in Radiology. These methods were chosen as they use equipment that is typically available to a diagnostic imaging physicist.We determine that the EFOMP protocol and the conventional CTDI method produce the best estimate of the radiation output for quality control purposes. Our conclusion is that the EFOMP protocol is the fastest and easiest method to measure a CBCT metric but it is not always accessible. For the systems in our hospital we will adopt the EFOMP protocol for open systems (C-arms) and perform CTDI_Vol measurements using conventional techniques on enclosed systems (O-arm and extremity CT).     

Imaging dose from cone beam computed tomography in radiation therapy

Imaging dose in radiation therapy has traditionally been ignored due to its low magnitude and frequency in comparison to therapeutic dose used to treat patients. The advent of modern, volumetric, imaging modalities, often as an integral part of linear accelerators, has facilitated the implementation of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), which is often accomplished by daily imaging of patients. Daily imaging results in additional dose delivered to patient that warrants new attention be given to imaging dose. This review summarizes the imaging dose delivered to patients as the result of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging performed in radiation therapy using current methods and equipment. This review also summarizes methods to calculate the imaging dose, including the use of Monte Carlo (MC) and treatment planning systems (TPS). Peripheral dose from CBCT imaging, dose reduction methods, the use of effective dose in describing imaging dose, and the measurement of CT dose index (CTDI) in CBCT systems are also reviewed.     

X-ray dose reduction using additional copper filtration for dental cone beam CT

This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the effect of additional copper-filters (Cu-filters) on the radiation dose and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in a dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The Cu-filter thickness and tube voltage of the CBCT unit were varied in the range of 0.00–0.20 mm and 70–90 kV, respectively. The CBCT images of a phantom with homogeneous materials of aluminum, air, and bone equivalent material (BEM) were acquired. The CNRs were calculated from the voxel values of each homogeneous material. The CTDI_vol was measured using standard polymethyl methacrylate CTDI test objects. We evaluated and analyzed the effects of tube current and various radiation qualities on the CNRs and CTDI_vol. We observed a tendency for higher CNR at increasing tube voltage and tube current in all the homogeneous materials. On the other hand, the CNR reduced at increasing Cu-filter thickness. The tube voltage of 90 kV showed a clear advantage in the tube current–CNR curves in all the homogeneous materials. The CTDI_vol increased as the tube voltage and tube current increased and decreased with the increase in the Cu-filter thickness. When the CNR was fixed at 9.23 of BEM at an exposure setting of 90 kV/5 mA without a Cu-filter, the CTDI_vol at 90 kV with Cu-filters was 8.7% lower compared with that at 90 kV without a Cu-filter. The results from this study demonstrate the potential of adding a Cu-filter for patient dose reduction while ensuring the image quality.     

Surgivisio® and O-arm®O2 cone beam CT mobile systems for guidance of lumbar spine surgery: Comparison of patient radiation dose

PurposeTo compare patient radiation doses in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of two mobile systems used for navigation-assisted mini-invasive orthopedic surgery: O-arm®O2 and Surgivisio®.MethodsThe study focused on imaging of the spine. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure organs and effective doses (ED) during CBCT. An ionization-chamber and a solid-state sensor were used to measure the incident air-kerma (K_i) at the center of the CBCT field-of-view and K_i during 2D-imaging, respectively. The PCXMC software was used to calculate patient ED in 2D and CBCT configurations. The image quality in CBCT was evaluated with the CATPHAN phantom.ResultsThe experimental ED estimate for the low-dose 3D-modes was 2.41 and 0.35 mSv with O-arm®O2 (Low Dose 3D-small-abdomen) and Surgivisio® (3DSU-91 images), respectively. PCXMC results were consistent: 1.54 and 0.30 mSv. Organ doses were 5 to 12 times lower with Surgivisio®. K_i at patient skin were comparable on lateral 2D-imaging (0.5 mGy), but lower with O-arm®O2 on anteroposterior (0.3 versus 0.9 mGy). Both systems show poor low contrast resolution and similar high contrast spatial resolution (7 line-pairs/cm).ConclusionsThis study is the first to evaluate patient ED and organ doses with Surgivisio®. A significant difference in organs doses was observed between the CBCT systems. The study demonstrates that Surgivisio® used on spine delivers approximately five to six times less patient ED, compared to O-arm®O2, in low dose 3D-modes. Doses in 2D-mode preceding CBCT were higher with Surgivisio®, but negligible compared to CBCT doses under the experimental conditions tested.     

Organ doses from a proton gantry-mounted cone-beam computed tomography system characterized with MCNP6 and GATE

PurposeTo determine organ doses from a proton gantry-mounted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system using two Monte Carlo codes and to study the influence on organ doses from different acquisition modes and repeated imaging.MethodsThe CBCT system was characterized with MCNP6 and GATE using measurements of depth doses in water and spatial profiles in air. The beam models were validated against absolute dose measurements and used to simulate organ doses from CBCT imaging with head, thorax and pelvis protocols. Anterior and posterior 190° scans were simulated and the resulting organ doses per mAs were compared to those from 360° scans. The influence on organ doses from repeated imaging with different imaging schedules was also investigated.ResultsThe agreement between MCNP6, GATE and measurements with regard to depth doses and beam profiles was within 4% for all protocols and the corresponding average agreement in absolute dose validation was 4%. Absorbed doses for in-field organs from 360° scans ranged between 6 and 8 mGy, 15–17 mGy and 24–54 mGy for the head, thorax and pelvis protocols, respectively. Cumulative organ doses from repeated CBCT imaging ranged between 0.04 and 0.32 Gy for weekly imaging and 0.2–1.6 Gy for daily imaging. The anterior scans resulted in an average increase in dose per mAs of 24% to the organs of interest relative to the 360° scan, while the posterior scan showed a 37% decrease.ConclusionsA proton gantry-mounted CBCT system was accurately characterized with MCNP6 and GATE. Organ doses varied greatly depending on acquisition mode, favoring posterior scans.     

Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners

PurposeTo calculate organ doses and estimate the effective dose for justification purposes in patients undergoing orthognathic treatment planning purposes and temporal bone imaging in dental cone beam CT (CBCT) and Multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners.MethodsThe radiation dose to the ICRP reference male voxel phantom was calculated for dedicated orthognathic treatment planning acquisitions via Monte Carlo simulations in two dental CBCT scanners, Promax 3D Max (Planmeca, FI) and NewTom VGi evo (QR s.r.l, IT) and in Somatom Definition Flash (Siemens, DE) MDCT scanner. For temporal bone imaging, radiation doses were calculated via MC simulations for a CBCT protocol in NewTom 5G (QR s.r.l, IT) and with the use of a software tool (CT-expo) for Somatom Force (Siemens, DE). All procedures had been optimized at the acceptance tests of the devices.ResultsFor orthognathic protocols, dental CBCT scanners deliver lower doses compared to MDCT scanners. The estimated effective dose (ED) was 0.32 mSv for a normal resolution operation mode in Promax 3D Max, 0.27 mSv in VGi-evo and 1.18 mSv in the Somatom Definition Flash. For temporal bone protocols, the Somatom Force resulted in an estimated ED of 0.28 mSv while for NewTom 5G the ED was 0.31 and 0.22 mSv for monolateral and bilateral imaging respectively.ConclusionsTwo clinical exams which are carried out with both a CBCT or a MDCT scanner were compared in terms of radiation dose. Dental CBCT scanners deliver lower doses for orthognathic patients whereas for temporal bone procedures the doses were similar.     

A new cone-beam computed tomography dosimetry method providing optimal measurement positions: A Monte Carlo study

PurposeThe conventional weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDI_w) may not be suitable for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dosimetry because a cross-sectional dose distribution is angularly inhomogeneous owing to partial angle irradiations. This study was conducted to develop a new dose metric (f(0)^CB_w) for CBCT dosimetry to determine a more accurate average dose in the central cross-sectional plane of a cylindrical phantom using Monte Carlo simulations.MethodsFirst, cross-sectional dose distributions of cylindrical polymethyl methacrylate phantoms over a wide range of phantom diameters (8–40 cm) were calculated for various CBCT scan protocols. Then, by obtaining linear least-squares fits of the full datasets of the cross-sectional dose distributions, the optimal radial positions, which represented measurement positions for the average phantom dose, were determined. Finally, the f(0)^CB_w method was developed by averaging point doses at the optimal radial positions of the phantoms. To demonstrate its validity, the relative differences between the average doses and each dose index value were estimated for the devised f(0)^CB_w, conventional CTDI_w, and Haba’s CTDI_w methods, respectively.ResultsThe relative differences between the average doses and each dose index value were within 4.1%, 16.7%, and 11.9% for the devised, conventional CTDI_w, and Haba’s CTDI_w methods, respectively.ConclusionsThe devised f(0)^CB_w value was calculated by averaging four “point doses” at 90° intervals and the optimal radial positions of the cylindrical phantom. The devised method can estimate the average dose more accurately than the previously developed CTDI_w methods for CBCT dosimetry.     

Abdominal imaging dose in radiology and radiotherapy – Phantom point dose measurements,effective dose and secondary cancer risk

PurposeTo compare abdominal imaging dose from 3D imaging in radiology (standard/low-dose/dual-energy CT) and radiotherapy (planning CT, kV cone-beam CT (CBCT)).MethodsDose was measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD’s) placed at 86 positions in an anthropomorphic phantom. Point, organ and effective dose were assessed, and secondary cancer risk from imaging was estimated.ResultsOverall dose and mean organ dose comparisons yield significantly lower dose for the optimized radiology protocols (dual-source and care kV), with an average dose of 0.34±0.01 mGy and 0.54±0.01 mGy (average ± standard deviation), respectively. Standard abdominal CT and planning CT involve considerably higher dose (13.58 ± 0.18 mGy and 18.78±0.27 mGy, respectively). The CBCT dose show a dose fall-off near the field edges. On average, dose is reduced as compared with the planning or standard CT (3.79 ± 0.21 mGy for 220° rotation and 7.76 ± 0.37 mGy for 360°), unless the high-quality setting is chosen (20.30 ± 0.96 mGy). The mean organ doses show a similar behavior, which translates to the estimated secondary cancer risk. The modelled risk is in the range between 0.4 cases per million patient years (PY) for the radiological scans dual-energy and care kV, and 300 cases per million PY for the high-quality CBCT setting.ConclusionsModern radiotherapy imaging techniques (while much lower in dose than radiotherapy), involve considerably more dose to the patient than modern radiology techniques. Given the frequency of radiotherapy imaging, a further reduction in radiotherapy imaging dose appears to be both desirable and technically feasible.     

Radiation dose and cancer risks from radiation exposure during abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scans: comparison of diagnostic and radiotherapy treatment planning CT scans

In the present study, radiation doses and cancer risks resulting from abdominopelvic radiotherapy planning computed tomography (RP-CT) and abdominopelvic diagnostic CT (DG-CT) examinations are compared. Two groups of patients who underwent abdominopelvic CT scans with RP-CT (n = 50) and DG-CT (n = 50) voluntarily participated in this study. The two groups of patients had approximately similar demographic features including mass, height, body mass index, sex, and age. Radiation dose parameters included CTDI_vol, dose–length product, scan length, effective tube current, and pitch factor, all taken from the CT scanner console. The ImPACT software was used to calculate the patient-specific radiation doses. The risks of cancer incidence and mortality were estimated based on the BEIR VII report of the US National Research Council. In the RP-CT group, the mean ± standard deviation of cancer incidence risk for all cancers, leukemia, and all solid cancers was 621.58 ± 214.76, 101.59 ± 27.15, and 516.60 ± 189.01 cancers per 100,000 individuals, respectively, for male patients. For female patients, the corresponding risks were 742.71 ± 292.35, 74.26 ± 20.26, and 667.03 ± 275.67 cancers per 100,000 individuals, respectively. In contrast, for DG-CT cancer incidence risks were 470.22 ± 170.07, 78.23 ± 18.22, and 390.25 ± 152.82 cancers per 100,000 individuals for male patients, while they were 638.65 ± 232.93, 62.14 ± 13.74, and 575.73 ± 221.21 cancers per 100,000 individuals for female patients. Cancer incidence and mortality risks were greater for RP-CT than for DG-CT scans. It is concluded that the various protocols of abdominopelvic CT scans, especially the RP-CT scans, should be optimized with respect to the radiation doses associated with these scans.

     

A patient-centric approach to quality control and dosimetry in CT including CBCT

One measurement and an algebraic formula are used to calculate the incident air kerma (K_a,i) at the skin after any CT examination, including cone-beam CT (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT).Empty scans were performed with X-ray CBCT systems (dental, C-arm and linac guidance scanners) as well as two MSCT scanners. The accumulated K_a,i at the flat panel (in CBCT) or the maximum incident air kerma at the isocentre (in MSCT) were measured using a solid-state probe. The average K_a,i(skin), at the skin of a hypothetical patient, was calculated using the proposed formula. Additional measurements of dose at the isocentre (D_FOV) and kerma-area product (KAP), as well as K_a,i(skin) from thermoluminiscence dosimeters (TLDs) and size-specific dose estimates are presented for comparison.The K_a,i(skin) for the standard head size in the dental scanner, the C-arm (high dose head protocol) and the linac (head protocol) were respectively 3.33 ± 0.19 mGy, 15.15 ± 0.76 mGy and 3.23 ± 0.16 mGy. For the first MSCT, the calculated K_a,i(skin) was 13.1 ± 0.7 mGy and the TLDs provided a K_a,i(skin) between 10.3 ± 1.1 mGy and 13.8 ± 1.4 mGy.Estimation of patient air kerma in tomography with an uncertainty below 7% is thus feasible using an empty scan and conventional measurement tools. The provided equations and website can be applied to a standard size for the sake of quality control or to several sizes for the definition of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). The obtained incident air kerma can be directly compared to the K_a,i from other X-ray modalities as recommended by ICRU and IAEA.     

A cloud-fog software architecture for dental CBCT dose monitoring using the DICOM structured report: Automated establishment of DRL

PurposeThe diagnostic reference level (DRL) has been established to optimize the diagnostic methods and reduce radiation dose during radiographic examinations. The aim of this study was to present a completely new solution based on Cloud-Fog software architecture for automatic establishment of the DRL values during dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) according to digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) structured reports.Methods and MaterialsA Cloud-Fog software architecture was used for automatic data handling. This architecture used the DICOM structured reports as a source for extracting the required information by fog devices in the imaging center. These devices transferred the derived information to the cloud server. The cloud server calculated the value of indication-based DRL in dental CBCT imaging based upon the parameters and adequate quantities of the absorbed dose. The feedback of DRL value was continuously announced to the imaging centers in 6 phases. In each phase, the level of the dose was optimized in imaging centers.ResultsThe DRL value was established for 5-specific indications, including third molar teeth (511 mGy.cm²), implant (719 mGy.cm²), form and position anomalies of the tooth (408 mGy.cm²), dentoalveolar pathologies (612 mGy.cm²), and endodontics (632 mGy.cm²). The determination of the DRL value in each phase revealed a downward trend until stabilization.ConclusionThe new solution presented in this study makes it possible to calculate and update the DRL value nationally and automatically among all centers. Also, the results showed that this approach is successful in establishing stabilized DRL values.     

Investigating centering,scan length,and arm position impact on radiation dose across 4 countries from 4 continents during pandemic: Mitigating key radioprotection issues

PurposeOptimization of CT scan practices can help achieve and maintain optimal radiation protection. The aim was to assess centering, scan length, and positioning of patients undergoing chest CT for suspected or known COVID-19 pneumonia and to investigate their effect on associated radiation doses.MethodsWith respective approvals from institutional review boards, we compiled CT imaging and radiation dose data from four hospitals belonging to four countries (Brazil, Iran, Italy, and USA) on 400 adult patients who underwent chest CT for suspected or known COVID-19 pneumonia between April 2020 and August 2020. We recorded patient demographics and volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol) and dose length product (DLP). From thin-section CT images of each patient, we estimated the scan length and recorded the first and last vertebral bodies at the scan start and end locations. Patient mis-centering and arm position were recorded. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA).ResultsThe extent and frequency of patient mis-centering did not differ across the four CT facilities (>0.09). The frequency of patients scanned with arms by their side (11–40% relative to those with arms up) had greater mis-centering and higher CTDI_vol and DLP at 2/4 facilities (p = 0.027–0.05). Despite lack of variations in effective diameters (p = 0.14), there were significantly variations in scan lengths, CTDI_vol and DLP across the four facilities (p < 0.001).ConclusionsMis-centering, over-scanning, and arms by the side are frequent issues with use of chest CT in COVID-19 pneumonia and are associated with higher radiation doses.     

The clinical feasibility and performance of an orthogonal X-ray imaging system for image-guided radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer patients: Comparison with cone-beam CT

The demand for greater accuracy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has driven the development of more advanced verification systems for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The purpose of this study is to investigate setup discrepancies measured between an orthogonal X-ray guidance system (XGS-10) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of Varian in the IMRT of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). The setup errors measured by XGS-10 and CBCT at the treatment unit with respect to the planning CTs were recorded for 30 patients with NPC. The differences in residual setup errors between XGS-10 system and CBCT were computed and quantitatively analyzed. The time of image acquisition and image registration was recorded. The radiation doses delivered by CBCT and XGS-10 were measured using PTW0.6CC ionization chambers and a water phantom. The differences between setup errors measured by the XGS-10 system and CBCT were generally <1.5 mm for translations, indicating a reasonably good agreement between the two systems for patients with NPC in the translation directions of A-P (P = 0.856), L-R (P = 0.856) and S-I (P = 0.765). Moreover, compared with CBCT, XGS-10 took much shorter image acquisition and registration time (P <0.001) and delivered only a small fraction of extra radiation dose to the patients (P <0.001). These results indicate that XGS-10 offers high localization accuracy similar to CBCT and additional benefits including prompt imaging process, low imaging radiation exposure, real time monitoring, which therefore represents a potential attractive alternative to CBCT for clinical use.     

Feasibility of image quality improvement for high-speed CBCT imaging using deep convolutional neural network for image-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer

PurposeHigh-speed cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) can reduce both the scan time and the exposure dose. However, it causes noise and artifacts in the reconstructed images due to the lower number of acquired projection data. The purpose of this study is to improve the image quality of high-speed CBCT using a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN).MethodsCBCT images of 36 prostate cancer patients were selected. The CBCT images acquired at normal scan speed were defined as CBCT_100%. Simulated high-speed CBCT images acquired at twofold and fourfold scan speed were created, which were defined as CBCT_50% and CBCT_25%, respectively. The image quality of the CBCT_50% was treated as the requirement for IGRT in this study because previous studies reported that its image is sufficient with respect to IGRT. The DCNN model was trained to learn direct mapping from CBCT_25% to the corresponding CBCT_100%. The performance of the DCNN model was evaluated using the sixfold cross-validation method. CBCT images generated by DCNN (CBCT_25%+DCNN) were evaluated for voxel value accuracy and image quality.ResultsThe DCNN model can process CBCT_25% of a new patient within 0.06 s/slice. The CBCT_25%+DCNN was comparable to the CBCT_50% in terms of both voxel value accuracy and image quality.ConclusionsWe developed a DCNN model to remove noise and artifacts from high-speed CBCT. We emphasize that it is possible to reduce exposure to one quarter and to increase the CBCT scan speed by a factor of four.     

High-Pitch CT Pulmonary Angiography in Third Generation Dual-Source CT: Image Quality in an Unselected Patient Population

Objectives

To investigate the feasibility of high-pitch CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in 3^rd generation dual-source CT (DSCT) in unselected patients.

Methods

Forty-seven patients with suspected pulmonary embolism underwent high-pitch CTPA on a 3^rd generation dual-source CT scanner. CT dose index (CTDI_vol) and dose length product (DLP) were obtained. Objective image quality was analyzed by calculating signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality on the central, lobar, segmental and subsegmental level was rated by two experienced radiologists.

Results

Median CTDI was 8.1 mGy and median DLP was 274 mGy*cm. Median SNR was 32.9 in the central and 31.9 in the segmental pulmonary arteries. CNR was 29.2 in the central and 28.2 in the segmental pulmonary arteries. Median image quality was “excellent” in central and lobar arteries and “good” in subsegmental arteries according to both readers. Segmental arteries varied between “excellent” and “good”. Image quality was non-diagnostic in one case (2%), beginning in the lobar arteries. Thirteen patients (28%) showed minor motion artifacts.

Conclusions

In third-generation dual-source CT, high-pitch CTPA is feasible for unselected patients. It yields excellent image quality with minimal motion artifacts. However, compared to standard-pitch cohorts, no distinct decrease in radiation dose was observed.     

Radiation dose measurements in a dental orthopantogram unit using indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters

Dental orthopantogram (OPG)/cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanners are gaining popularity due to their 3D imaging with multiplanar view that provides clinical benefits over conventional dental radiography systems. Dental OPG/CBCT provides optimal visualization of adjacent overlaying anatomical structures that will be superpositioned in any single projection. The characteristics of indigenously developed optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters, namely, aluminium oxide doped with carbon (Al₂O₃:C), lithium magnesium phosphate doped with terbium and boron (LiMgPO₄:Tb,B) and lithium calcium aluminium fluoride doped with europium and yttrium (LiCaAlF₆:Eu,Y) were evaluated for their use in dental dosimetry. The dose?response of these dosimeters was studied at X‐ray energies 60 kV, 70 kV and 81 kV. Radiation doses were also measured using Gafchromic film for comparison. Radiation dose was measured at eight different locations of a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) head phantom including eyes. The optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) sensitivity of LiMgPO₄:Tb,B is about 1.5 times and LiCaAlF₆:Eu, is about 20 times higher than the sensitivity of Al₂O₃:C. It was found that measured radiation doses by the three optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) and Gafchromic film in the occipital region (back side) of a PMMA phantom, were consistent but variations in dose at other locations were significantly higher. The three OSLDs used in this study were found to be suitable for radiation dose measurement in dental units.