Constraints on the tailflick assay: morphine analgesia and tolerance are dependent upon locus of tail stimulation

In three experiments, the locus of tail stimulation in the tailflick assay was found to be an important parameter in determining morphine action. Rats were intravenously infused (Experiment I), injected with morphine subcutaneously (Experiment II), or implanted subcutaneously with morphine pellets (Experiment III). Analgesia was evaluated periodically following drug administration using the tailflick test and 3 adjacent 1 in. tail areas. In all three experiments, the distal tail section was more sensitive to the analgesic effects of morphine than more proximal sections. In Experiments I and III, tolerance to the effects of morphine developed more slowly at the distal tail location. These results indicate that the locus of stimulation in the tailflick assay can profoundly affect the development of analgesia and tolerance to morphine.     

Finasteride, a 5alpha-reductase inhibitor, potentiates antinociceptive effects of morphine, prevents the development of morphine tolerance and attenuates abstinence behavior in the rat

It has been shown that morphine increases 5alpha-reductase enzyme activity in the rat central nervous system; however importance of this finding on morphine analgesia, tolerance and dependence has not been reported. In the present study, we investigated inhibition of 5alpha-reductase enzyme on morphine effects using finasteride. To determine whether the 5alpha-reductase enzyme interact with morphine analgesia, finasteride (5 mg/kg, i.p.) was administrated with morphine (5 and 7 mg/kg, i.p.). The tail-flick test was used to assess the nociceptive threshold, before and 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after drug administration. In tolerance experiments, morphine 20 mg/kg was injected i.p., twice daily for 4 days. The development and expression of dependence were assessed in the naloxone precipitation test 5 days after the morphine (20-30 mg/kg, i.p.) administration. We found that finasteride could potentiate the antinociceptive effect of morphine. In addition, chronic finasteride administration effectively blocked development of tolerance and dependence to morphine. Following chronic morphine administration, single dose injection of finasteride failed to reverse tolerance but prevented naloxone precipitate withdrawal syndrome. Therefore, it was concluded that there is a functional relationship between 5alpha-reductase enzyme and morphine.     

Intragastric administration of cyclo(Leu-Gly) inhibits the development of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine in the rat

The effect of intragastric administration of cyclo(Leu-Gly), a cyclic dipeptide derived from melanotropin release inhibiting factor (Pro-Leu-Gly-NH2), on the development of tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine in the rat was determined. The tolerance to morphine in the rat was induced by subcutaneous implantation of four morphine pellets during a 3-day period. The rats which served as controls were implanted with placebo pellets. The analgesic response to a challenge dose of morphine was determined by the tail-flick test. The tail-flick latencies were determined before and then every 30 min for 180 min. The analgesic response was computed by determining the area under the time-response curve. Implantation of morphine pellets resulted in the development of tolerance as evidenced by decreased analgesic response to morphine in morphine pellet implanted rats as compared to placebo pellet implanted rats. Chronic intragastric administration of cyclo(Leu-Gly) (4 to 16 mg/kg) inhibited the development of tolerance to morphine. A dose of 8 mg/kg of cyclo(Leu-Gly) completely blocked the tolerance to morphine. The study provides for the first time evidence that intragastric administration of a cyclic peptide can inhibit the development of tolerance to morphine, and that effective neuropeptides and their analogs can be developed as potential drugs to inhibit opiate-induced tolerance.     

Evidence that ginsenosides prevent the development of opioid tolerance at the central nervous system

The analgesic effect of ginsenosides or morphine was first determined following intrathecal (i.t.) administration in rat tail-flick test. The effect of chronic i.t. co-administration of ginsenosides with morphine on the development of opioid tolerance were also examined using rat tail-flick test. Administration of ginsenosides (i.t.) produced a weak antinociception in a dose-dependent manner. Administration of morphine (i.t.) also produced antinociception in a dose-dependent manner. The ED50 was 1.20 microg (1.14-1.29 microg). However, acute i.t. co-administration of ginsenosides with morphine was not additive in antinociception. Repeated i.t. co-administration of 200 microg ginsenosides with 10 microg morphine inhibited the development of tolerance induced by 10 microg morphine in rat tail-flick test, although i.t. co-administration of 50 or 100 microg ginsenosides with morphine was without effect. In conclusion, these results indicate that i.t. administered ginsenosides produce an antinociception in rat tail-flick test and also prevent opioid tolerance caused by chronic treatment with morphine at the spinal sites.     

Role of opioid and adrenergic mechanisms in the analgesic action of GABA-positive drugs

The experiments on rats have shown that repeated administration of depakin and baclofen induced the development of tolerance to their antinociceptive effect. The animals tolerant to depakin and baclofen were supersensitive to the analgetic effect of morphine and clonidine in tail-flick test. In vocalization test the analgetic effect of clonidine in baclofen- and depakin-tolerant animals was not altered. The antinociceptive effect of morphine under these conditions was reduced significantly in depakin-tolerant rats and was unchanged in baclofen-tolerant animals. The role of opioid and adrenergic mechanisms in GABA-ergic analgesia and in the development of tolerance is discussed.     

The occurrence of cross-tolerance between morphine and ethyl-ketocyclazocine using the tail-flick test: Lack of effect of diazepam,phenobarbital, or amphetamine

Experiments were designed to test for short-term tolerance to morphine and ethyl-ketocyclazocine (EKC), mu and kappa agonists, respectively, and cross-tolerance between the two drugs. Mice were primed with one of the drugs, using doses that did not affect the tail-flick response when tested at a time 1 or 3 hours later, when the same or alternate test drug was administered. All animals were injected with the priming drug IP. In one series of experiments, the test drugs were given SC, and in the other, the test drugs were injected ICV under brief halothane anesthesia. Priming with morphine (30 or 100 mg/kg) significantly raised the ED₅₀ for ICV morphine. Priming with EKC (2 or 6 mg/kg) similarly elevated the ED₅₀'s for SC and ICV EKC. Symmetrical cross-tolerance was produced in experiments where the test drugs were administered SC when tested at 3 hrs. The effects of priming with EKC on morphine analgesia was evident when the interval between priming and test drugs was 1 hour. When the test drugs were given ICV, cross-tolerance was also symmetrical: priming with EKC significantly raised the ED₅₀ for morphine and priming with morphine raised the ED₅₀ for EKC when tested at 3 hrs. These data suggest that both agonists act on a common site to produce analgesia as similar pA₂ values for naloxone antagonism were determined. The occurrence of short-term tolerance and cross-tolerance to the opiates was unaltered by chronic pretreatment with diazepam, phenobarbital, or amphetamine.     

Gz mediates the long-lasting desensitization of brain CB1 receptors and is essential for cross-tolerance with morphine

Background

Although the systemic administration of cannabinoids produces antinociception, their chronic use leads to analgesic tolerance as well as cross-tolerance to morphine. These effects are mediated by cannabinoids binding to peripheral, spinal and supraspinal CB1 and CB2 receptors, making it difficult to determine the relevance of each receptor type to these phenomena. However, in the brain, the CB1 receptors (CB1Rs) are expressed at high levels in neurons, whereas the expression of CB2Rs is marginal. Thus, CB1Rs mediate the effects of smoked cannabis and are also implicated in emotional behaviors. We have analyzed the production of supraspinal analgesia and the development of tolerance at CB1Rs by the direct injection of a series of cannabinoids into the brain. The influence of the activation of CB1Rs on supraspinal analgesia evoked by morphine was also evaluated.

Results

Intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of cannabinoid receptor agonists, WIN55,212-2, ACEA or methanandamide, generated a dose-dependent analgesia. Notably, a single administration of these compounds brought about profound analgesic tolerance that lasted for more than 14 days. This decrease in the effect of cannabinoid receptor agonists was not mediated by depletion of CB1Rs or the loss of regulated G proteins, but, nevertheless, it was accompanied by reduced morphine analgesia. On the other hand, acute morphine administration produced tolerance that lasted only 3 days and did not affect the CB1R. We found that both neural mu-opioid receptors (MORs) and CB1Rs interact with the HINT1-RGSZ module, thereby regulating pertussis toxin-insensitive Gz proteins. In mice with reduced levels of these Gz proteins, the CB1R agonists produced no such desensitization or morphine cross-tolerance. On the other hand, experimental enhancement of Gz signaling enabled an acute icv administration of morphine to produce a long-lasting tolerance at MORs that persisted for more than 2 weeks, and it also impaired the analgesic effects of cannabinoids.

Conclusion

In the brain, cannabinoids can produce analgesic tolerance that is not associated with the loss of surface CB1Rs or their uncoupling from regulated transduction. Neural specific Gz proteins are essential mediators of the analgesic effects of supraspinal CB1R agonists and morphine. These Gz proteins are also responsible for the long-term analgesic tolerance produced by single doses of these agonists, as well as for the cross-tolerance between CB1Rs and MORs.     

Environmental and intraperitoneal ethanol influences morphine antinociceptive effect in mice

The ability of acute environmental or intraperitoneal (i.p.) ethanol to influence morphine antinociceptive effect was studied in mice. In order to induce tolerance to morphine analgesia, mice received daily injections of 10 mg/Kg morphine over a period of 10 days. Mice were divided into three groups: i.p. ethanol (E), environmental ethanol (E*), and control saline (M). During the induction of tolerance these groups were treated identically except on days 1 and 11. On these days, 10 minutes prior to morphine injection, mice received either i.p. ethanol (1g/Kg), environmental ethanol (a bottle of 10% ethanol placed next to the animals cage during the experiments), or an equivalent volume of saline. Analgesia was assessed using a standard hot plate protocol and dose-response cumulative curves for morphine analgesia were obtained on days 1 and 11. On day 1, both the i.p. and environmental administration of ethanol showed similar morphine-potentiation effects [Mean Effective Dose: ED50 (M1)=4.5 mg/kg; ED50 (E1)=2.4 mg/kg; ED50 (E*1)=2.1 mg/kg]. On day 11, control group mice showed a reduction of morphine analgesia at test [ED50 (M11)=14.1 mg/kg]. Mice receiving i.p. and environmental ethanol again showed a leftward shift in dose-response cumulative curves for morphine antinociception with respect to controls [ED50 (E11)=9.1 mg/kg; ED50 (E*11)=4.7 mg/kg]. I.p. ethanol administration at non-antinociceptive doses enhances the morphine antinociception effect similarly in tolerant and non-tolerant (naive) mice. The presence of environmental ethanol can also induce a similar pattern of increase in morphine antinociception effect.     

Proteomic analysis of spinal protein expression in rats exposed to repeated intrathecal morphine injection

Repeated administration of morphine for treating severe chronic pain may lead to neuroadaptive changes in the spinal cord that are thought to underlie molecular mechanisms of the development of morphine tolerance and physical dependence. Here, we employed a 2-D gel-based proteomic technique to detect the global changes of the spinal cord protein expression in rats that had developed morphine tolerance. Morphine tolerance at the spinal cord level was induced by repeated intrathecal injections of morphine (20 microg/10 microL) twice daily for 5 days and evaluated by measurements of paw withdrawal latencies and maximal possible analgesic effect at day 5. After behavioral tests, the lumbar enlargement segments of spinal cord were harvested and proteins resolved by 2-DE. We found that eight proteins were significantly up-regulated or down-regulated in spinal cord after morphine tolerance development, including proteins involved in targeting and trafficking of the glutamate receptors and opioid receptors, proteins involved in oxidative stress, and cytoskeletal proteins, some of which were confirmed by Western blot analysis. Morphine-induced expressional changes of these proteins in the spinal cord might be involved in the central mechanisms that underlie the development of morphine tolerance. It is very likely that these identified proteins may serve as potential molecular targets for prevention of the development of morphine tolerance and physical dependence.     

Tolerance to effects of clonidine and morphine on sulfobromophthalein disposition in mice

Chronic treatment of mice with clonidine or morphine caused tolerance to the analgesic and thermoregulatory effects of these drugs. After chronic morphine, mice also became tolerant to the analgesic and thermoregulatory effects of clonidine. Cross tolerance to the hypothermic effect of morphine was demonstrated after chronic clonidine administration, but no diminution of morphine-induced analgesia could be shown. Morphine and clonidine acutely increased the retention of sulfobromophthalein (BSP) in plasma and liver. Chronic dosing with morphine or clonidine caused partial tolerance and cross-tolerance to the rise in hepatic BSP caused by an acute challenge with either agonist. However, both drugs elevated plasma BSP levels similarly in tolerant and non-tolerant mice. Thus, regimens which readily induced tolerance to the analgesic and hypothermic effects of morphine or clonidine were only partially effective in modifying the acute hepatobiliary effects of these drugs.     

Cross tolerance between morphine and β-endorphin in vivo

Experiments were performed to establish the development of cross tolerance between morphine and the C-terminal fragment of porcine β-lipotropin /LPH_61–91, β-endorphin/ in rats. Repeated intracerebroventricular /ICV/ or peripheral administration of morphine induced tolerance both to morphine and β-endorphin. The tolerance induced by ICV administration of morphine was more pronounced than in the case of peripheral application. The results give support to the theory that at least in part similar sites and mechanisms are involved in the analgesic activity of morphine and the endorphins.     

Chimeric peptide of Met-enkephalin and FMRFa induces antinociception and attenuates development of tolerance to morphine antinociception.

A synthetic chimeric peptide of Met-enkephalin and FMRFamide (YGGFMKKKFMRFa), based on MERF was synthesized. This peptide was tested for possible antinociceptive effects using the tail flick test in mice. The effect of the chimeric peptide on morphine antinociception and development of tolerance to the antinociceptive action of morphine was also investigated. The chimeric peptide produced significant, dose-dependent antinociception (40, 60 and 90 mg/kg) in the tail flick test. Pretreatment with naloxone (5 mg/kg, IP) significantly attenuated the antinociceptive effect induced by the chimeric peptide (90 mg/kg, IP), indicating involvement of an opioidergic mechanism. In combination experiments with morphine, the antinociceptive dose of the chimeric peptide (60 mg/kg, IP) potentiated morphine (7 mg/kg, IP) antinociception. A low dose of the chimeric peptide (10 mg/kg, IP), that did not produce significant antinociception on its own, also potentiated morphine antinociception. In the tolerance studies, male albino mice received twice daily injections of morphine (20 mg/kg, IP) followed by either saline (0.1 ml) or chimeric peptide (80 mg/kg, IP) for a period of 4 days. A control group received twice daily injections of saline (0.1 ml) for the same period. When tested on Day 5, tolerance to antinociceptive action of morphine (15 mg/kg, IP) was evidenced by decreased response in chronic morphine plus saline treated mice compared to control group. Concurrent administration of chimeric peptide (80 mg/kg, IP) with morphine significantly attenuated the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive action of morphine. The preliminary results of this study demonstrate that peripherally administered chimeric peptide can produce dose dependent, naloxone reversible, antinociception; potentiate morphine antinociception and attenuate morphine tolerance, indicating a possible role of these type of amphiactive sequences in antinociception and its modulation. These chimeric peptides may also prove to be useful tools for further ascertaining the role of FMRFa family of peptides in mechanisms leading to opiate tolerance and dependence.     

Effects of fluoxetine and LY 367265 on tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine in rats

Morphine is widely used to treat chronic pain, however its utility is hindered by the development of tolerance to its analgesic effects. The aim of this study was to investigate effects of fluoxetine, a specific serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, and LY 367265, an inhibitor of the 5-HT transporter and 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, on tolerance induced to the analgesic effect of morphine in rats. The study was carried out on male Wistar Albino rats (weighing 170-190 g). To constitute morphine tolerance, animals received morphine (50 mg/kg; s.c.) once daily for 3 days. After last dose of morphine, injected on day 4, morphine tolerance was evaluated. The analgesic effects of fluoxetine (10 mg/ kg; i.p.), LY 367265 (3 mg/kg; i.p.) and morphine were considered at 30-min intervals by tail-flick and hot-plate tests. The results showed that fluoxetine and LY 367265 significantly attenuated the development and expression of morphine tolerance. The maximal antinociceptive effects were obtained 30 min after administration of fluoxetine and 60 min after administration of LY 367265. In conclusion, we observed that co-injection of morphine with fluoxetine and LY 367265 increased the analgesic effects of morphine and delayed development of tolerance to morphine analgesia.     

Mechanism of development of tolerance to injected morphine by guinea pig ileum.

Injection of a large dose of morphine into a guinea pig results in a block of electrically-induced contractions of the ileum $\text{in vitro}$. A similar dose is almost ineffective in guinea pigs given morphine chronically. The time course for development of this tolerance has been determined in guinea pigs injected twice daily with morphine 100 mg/kg and challenged on various days with 750 mg/kg of the drug. Animals similarly injected but not challenged served as controls. The inhibitory effect of the challenging dose on electrical stimulation of longitudinal muscle decreased with successive days of morphine administration; by the 10th day there was almost complete tolerance to the challenging dose. Sensitivity of the tissues of chronically morphinized unchallenged controls towards acetylcholine, serotonin, histamine and norepinephrine was essentially the same as that of naive animals. The potency of morphine $\text{in vitro}$ in blocking electrical stimulation was also unchanged by chronic morphine administration in the above manner. Thus tolerance to injected morphine cannot be explained by reduced affinity of the drug for the opiate receptor. Tissues of chronically morphinized animals gave a contracture with naloxone, the extent of the contracture increasing with time of drug administration. This naloxone effect is attributed to displacement of morphine from a new opiate receptor site induced during morphine administration. It is suggested that this new receptor is involved in tolerance to injected morphine as well as some aspects of the withdrawal syndrome.     

Short-term tolerance to morphine: effects of diazepam, phenobarbital, and amphetamine

Short-term tolerance to morphine, which can be demonstrated in as little as 3 hours after a single administration of the opiate, was examined in animals chronically pretreated with diazepam, phenobarbital, or amphetamine. Tail-flick latency in mice and changes in plasma corticosterone in rats were the parameters tested in these experiments. Rats primed with either saline or morphine, 10 mg/kg, were injected 3 hours subsequently with morphine, 5 mg/kg. Those primed with saline showed the characteristic plasma corticosterone elevation following morphine, when serial blood samples were examined, whereas those previously treated with morphine did not. Mice were primed with saline or either of two doses of morphine, 30 or 100 mg/kg, 3.5 hours prior to estimation of tail-flick latency and ED50 determinations. Mice primed with either dose of morphine had significantly higher ED50's than those primed with saline. Chronic treatment with diazepam or amphetamine in either species did not significantly alter short-term tolerance development by either parameter. However, with phenobarbital pretreatment, the plasma corticosterone response was attenuated and short-term tolerance to morphine's analgesic effects did not occur. Further studies in morphine-pelleted mice showed that analgesic tolerance occurred similarly in all groups. This suggests that barbiturates may delay the process.     

Influence of adenosine analogs on morphine tolerance and dependence in mice

A number of adenosine agonists were investigated for possible actions on tolerance to morphine withdrawal in mice. The induction of tolerance to a sustained release preparation of morphine was assessed by measuring the analgesic effect induced by a test dose of the drug. The concomitant treatment with L- and D-phenylisopropyl adenosine, (L- and D-PIA), cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) or chloroadenosine (CADO) during the period of morphine absorption did not alter the induction of the process. In contrast cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) significantly decreased the intensity of tolerance. The administration of naloxone 30 hrs, after the priming dose of morphine induced an intense withdrawal reaction. The intensity of the abstinence syndrome was decreased by the administration of L-PIA, CHA or CADO; CPA and D-PIA were ineffective. These results suggest that adenosine analogs may interfere with the known morphine effects on calcium disposition in nerve terminals.     

Preference conditioning produced by opioid active and inactive isomers of levorphanol and morphine in rat

Using taste and place preference conditioning, the present study examined the motivational properties produced in adult rats by systemic administration of (-) and (+) morphine, levorphanol, and dextrorphan. Conditioned place preference was stereospecific; it was only produced by the opioid receptor active isomers, levorphanol and (-) morphine. Similarly, a conditioned taste preference produced by a low dose of morphine was only seen with the active isomer. Conditioned taste aversion, however, was produced in a comparable dose range by both the active and the inactive isomers. In addition injections of inactive isomers also produced tolerance to the taste aversion produced by (-) morphine. Therefore, administration of both opioid active and inactive isomers of opioid agonists are unconditioned stimuli for the production of preference behaviors. In addition, it was concluded that the appetitive reinforcing properties of these drugs, seen as taste and place preferences, appear to require activation of specific opioid receptors, whereas the aversive effects, seen as taste aversion may also involve other mechanisms.     

Regulation by chronic clonidine of adenylate cyclase and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in the rat locus coeruleus

Clonidine and morphine are known to produce tolerance and dependence in rat locus coeruleus (LC) neurons after chronic administration based on electrophysiological criteria. Previous studies have shown that morphine tolerance and dependence is associated with increases in levels of adenylate cyclase, pertussis toxin-mediated ADP-ribosylation of G-proteins, and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in this brain region. The present study was aimed at investigating whether clonidine tolerance and dependence is also associated with alterations in these intracellular messengers. It was found that, similar to chronic morphine, chronic (2 weeks) clonidine administration, under conditions that produce electrophysiological evidence of tolerance and dependence in LC neurons, increased levels of adenylate cyclase activity and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase activity in this brain region, but not in several other regions studied, which included the frontal cortex, neostriatum, and dorsal raphe. However, the changes induced by chronic clonidine in the LC, at maximal doses and duration of treatment, were only approximately 50% in magnitude of those observed in response to morphine. Unlike chronic morphine, chronic clonidine produced no change in G-protein ADP-ribosylation levels in the LC. Chronic administration of a number of other drugs, namely diazepam, chloral hydrate, and dextromethorphan, which produce electrophysiological actions distinct from those of clonidine and morphine in the LC, failed to alter adenylate cyclase and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in this brain region. The results indicate that increased levels of adenylate cyclase and cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase represent common adaptations by LC neurons to chronic clonidine and morphine, and raise the possibility that such changes contribute to the development of clonidine and morphine tolerance and dependence in these neurons.     

Delayed onset of single dose tolerance to morphine analgesia

Rats received either 20 mg/Kg of morphine sulfate I.P. or 5 μgm of morphine sulfate microinjected into the periaqueductal gray area of the brain. The analgesic effect of the morphine was determined by comparing pre- and postinjection tailflick latencies. To test for tolerance following a single injection, the procedure was repeated 6, 12 or 24 hours after the first injection and tests. Tolerance was not observed 6 hours after the original injection, tolerance was observed at 12 hours and increased tolerance was present at 24 hours. Single dose tolerance to morphine appears to develop slowly over a period of several hours and during much of this time, the amount of opiate present in the brain was insufficient to produce analgesia. Similarity between central and peripheral administration suggests a central mechanism of single dose tolerance.     

Cross tolerance to etorphine in rats tolerant to morphine-induced antidiuresis

Previously in the analgesic tail flick assay, mice and rats implanted with morphine pellets were shown to be highly tolerant to subcutaneously administered morphine but not to etorphine. The present purpose was to see whether the same differential response would be found to the antidiuretic response of morphine and etorphine in water-loaded rats because the presence of such a differential response would be of value in studying mechanisms of tolerance. Etorphine injected subcutaneously was about 1000x more potent than morphine in producing an antidiuretic response. Following chronic administration of morphine by pellet implantation, where the pellets remained in place during the drug challenge, profound tolerance developed to the antidiuretic effect of both morphine and etorphine. The dose-response curves for both were shifted to the right in non-parallel fashion with decreased slopes and antidiuretic efficacies. The large degree of tolerance developed to the antidiuretic effect of etorphine in morphine pellet implanted rats in contrast to the lack of development of tolerance to etorphine in the tail flick assay indicated that different mechanisms of development of tolerance exist for the two responses.