A novel snoRNA gene cluster in yeast is transcribed as polycistronic pre-snoRNAs

Small nueleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) play an important role in eukaryotic rRNA biogenesis. By combination of a computer search of EMBL database and experimental procedure, a novel snoRNA coding sequence (Z8) was screened out and characterized from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Z8 snoRNA gene codes a boxC/D antisonse snoRNA which guides, deduced from structure analysis, the 2'-O-ribose methylation at U_(2421) of 25S rRNA. After disruption of Z8 snoRNA gene, the methylation at corresponding site was abolished, but no growth delay was observed in various cultural temperatures. Z8 DNA is the first gene of a gene cluster consisting of three cognate snoRNA genes which are located on an intergenie region of chromosome ⅩⅢ. This gene cluster is co-transcribed as a pelycistronic precursor from a 247 bp U snoRNA gene promoter, followed by processing to release individual snoRNAs, representing a new expression pattern of snoRNA genes.     

The high diversity of snoRNAs in plants: identification and comparative study of 120 snoRNA genes from Oryza sativa

Using a powerful computer-assisted analysis strategy, a large-scale search of small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) genes in the recently released draft sequence of the rice genome was carried out. This analysis identified 120 different box C/D snoRNA genes with a total of 346 gene variants, which were predicted to guide 135 2′-O-ribose methylation sites in rice rRNAs. Though not exhaustive, this analysis has revealed that rice has the highest number of known box C/D snoRNAs among eukaryotes. Interestingly, although many snoRNA genes are conserved between rice and Arabidopsis, almost half of the identified snoRNA genes are rice specific, which may highlight further the differences in rRNA methylation patterns between monocotyledons and dicotyledons. In addition to 76 singletons, 70 clusters involving 270 snoRNA genes were also found in rice. The large number of the novel snoRNA polycistrons found in the introns of rice protein-coding genes is in contrast to the one-snoRNA-per-intron organization of vertebrates and yeast, and of Arabidopsis in which only a few intronic snoRNA gene clusters were identified. Furthermore, due to a high degree of gene duplication, rice snoRNA genes are clearly redundant and exhibit great sequence variation among isoforms, allowing generation of new snoRNAs for selection. Thus, the large snoRNA gene family in plants can serve as an excellent model for a rapid and functional evolution.     

Elucidating the role of C/D snoRNA in rRNA processing and modification in Trypanosoma brucei

Most eukaryotic C/D small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) guide 2′-O methylation (Nm) on rRNA and are also involved in rRNA processing. The four core proteins that bind C/D snoRNA in Trypanosoma brucei are fibrillarin (NOP1), NOP56, NOP58, and SNU13. Silencing of NOP1 by RNA interference identified rRNA-processing and modification defects that caused lethality. Systematic mapping of 2′-O-methyls on rRNA revealed the existence of hypermethylation at certain positions of the rRNA in the bloodstream form of the parasites, suggesting that this modification may assist the parasites in coping with the major temperature changes during cycling between their insect and mammalian hosts. The rRNA-processing defects of NOP1-depleted cells suggest the involvement of C/D snoRNA in trypanosome-specific rRNA-processing events to generate the small rRNA fragments. MRP RNA, which is involved in rRNA processing, was identified in this study in one of the snoRNA gene clusters, suggesting that trypanosomes utilize a combination of unique C/D snoRNAs and conserved snoRNAs for rRNA processing.     

Fibrillarin genes encode both a conserved nucleolar protein and a novel small nucleolar RNA involved in ribosomal RNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana

Fibrillarin is a key nucleolar protein in eukaryotes which associates with box C/D small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) directing 2'-O-ribose methylation of the rRNA. In this study we describe two genes in Arabidopsis thaliana, AtFib1 and AtFib2, encoding nearly identical proteins conserved with eukaryotic fibrillarins. We demonstrate that AtFib1 and AtFib2 proteins are functional homologs of the yeast Nop1p (fibrillarin) and can rescue a yeast NOP1-null mutant strain. Surprisingly, for the first time in plants, we identified two isoforms of a novel box C/D snoRNA, U60.1f and U60.2f, nested in the fifth intron of AtFib1 and AtFib2. Interestingly after gene duplication the host intronic sequences completely diverged, but the snoRNA was conserved, even in other crucifer fibrillarin genes. We show that the U60f snoRNAs accumulate in seedlings and that their targeted residue on the 25 S rRNA is methylated. Our data reveal that the three modes of expression of snoRNAs, single, polycistronic, and intronic, exist in plants and suggest that the mechanisms directing rRNA methylation, dependent on fibrillarin and box C/D snoRNAs, are evolutionarily conserved in plants.     

A novel snoRNA can direct site-specific 2'-O-ribose methylation of snRNAs in Oryza sativa

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are a kind of noncoding RNAs, and the vast majority of snoRNAs are involved in site-specific modifications of rRNAs. A novel box C/D snoRNA called snoR124 was found inOryza sativa, and it can direct 2'-O-ribose methylation of spliceosomal small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). The snoRNA has two antisense elements, and the results of primer extensions at different dNTP concentrations provide evidence that snoR124 guide 2'-O-methylations of the C76 residue in the U4 snRNA and the T91 residue in the U5 snRNA. In addition, this snoRNA is located in a snoRNA gene cluster with another 7 snoRNAs which are identified to direct ribose methylations in rRNAs. This is consistent with the opinion that the snoRNA gene organization in plant is mainly gene cluster. The snoR124 is the first example of a snoRNA that directs modifications of RNAs other than rRNAs in plant; it will avail to get more insights into the function of snoRNAs in plant.     

The genes for small nucleolar RNAs in Trypanosoma brucei are organized in clusters and are transcribed as a polycistronic RNA

Because the organization of snoRNA genes in vertebrates, plants and yeast is diverse, we investigated the organization of snoRNA genes in a distantly related organism, Trypanosoma brucei. We have characterized the second example of a snoRNA gene cluster that is tandemly repeated in the T.brucei genome. The genes encoding the box C/D snoRNAs TBR12, TBR6, TBR4 and TBR2 make up the cluster. In a genomic organization unique to trypanosomes, there are at least four clusters of these four snoRNA genes tandemly repeated in the T.brucei genome. We show for the first time that the genes encoding snoRNAs in both this cluster and the SLA cluster are transcribed in an unusual way as a polycistronic RNA.     

Small nucleolar RNA genes

Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are one of the most numerous and well-studied groups of non-protein-coding RNAs. In complex with proteins, snoRNAs perform the two most common nucleotide modifications in rRNA: 2'-O-methylation of ribose and pseudouridylation. Although the modification mechanisms and shoRNA structures are highly conserved, the snoRNA genes are surprisingly diverse in organization. In addition to genes transcribed independently, there are genes that are in introns of other genes, form clusters transcribed from a common promoter, or cluster in introns. Interestingly. one type of gene organization usually prevails in different taxa. Vertebrate snoRNAs mostly originate from introns of protein-coding genes; a small group of snoRNAs are encoded by introns of genes for noncoding RNAs.     

Plant snoRNA database

The Plant snoRNA database (http://www.scri.sari.ac.uk/plant_snoRNA/) provides information on small nucleolar RNAs from Arabidopsis and eighteen other plant species. Information includes sequences, expression data, methylation and pseudouridylation target modification sites, initial gene organization (polycistronic, single gene and intronic) and the number of gene variants. The Arabidopsis information is divided into box C/D and box H/ACA snoRNAs, and within each of these groups, by target sites in rRNA, snRNA or unknown. Alignments of orthologous genes and gene variants from different plant species are available for many snoRNA genes. Plant snoRNA genes have been given a standard nomenclature, designed wherever possible, to provide a consistent identity with yeast and human orthologues.     

Methodological obstacles in knocking down small noncoding RNAs

In the recent past, several thousand noncoding RNA (ncRNA) genes have been predicted within eukaryal genomes. However, for their functional analysis only a few high-throughput methods are currently available to knock down selected ncRNA species, such as microRNAs, which are targeted by antisense probes, termed antagomirs. We thus compared the efficiencies of four knockdown strategies, previously mainly employed for the analysis of protein-coding genes, to study the function of ncRNAs, in particular, small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). Thereby, the class of snoRNAs represents one of the most abundant ncRNA species. The majority of snoRNAs has been shown to mediate nucleotide modifications by targeting ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) through complementary antisense elements. However, some snoRNAs, termed “orphan snoRNAs,” lack telltale complementarities to rRNAs and thus their function remains elusive. We therefore applied RNA interference (RNAi), locked nucleic acid (LNA), or peptide nucleic acid antisense approaches, as well as a ribozyme-based strategy to knock down a snoRNA. As a proof of principle, we targeted the canonical U81 snoRNA, which has been shown to mediate modification of nucleotide A₃₉₁ within eukaryal 28S rRNA. Our results demonstrate that while RNAi is an unsuitable tool for snoRNA knockdown, a ribozyme-based strategy, as well as an LNA-antisense oligonucleotide approach, resulted in a decrease of U81 snoRNA expression levels up to 60%. However, no concomitant decrease in enzymatic activity of U81 snoRNA was observed, indicating that improvement of more efficient knockdown techniques for ncRNAs will be required in the future.