Prolactin response to sulpiride in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

Blood glucose, insulin and prolactin concentrations were determined before and after sulpiride injection (50 mg i.m.) in 20 non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients (10 with retinopathy and 10 without evidence of retinal damage) and 10 subjects with normal glucose tolerance. Prolactin response to sulpiride was significantly higher in diabetics than in controls (at 20 min., p less than 0.01; at 30 and 60 min., p less than 0.005; at 90 min., p less than 0.01; at 120 min., p less than 0.05). The sulpiride induced hyperprolactinemia did not influence blood glucose and plasma insulin levels in controls as well as in diabetic patients. Prolactin response to sulpiride was the same in diabetics with and in those without retinal changes. We conclude that acute hyperprolactinemia seems to have no influence on glucose homeostasis in normal and non insulin-dependent diabetic subjects.     

Lispro insulin and metformin versus other combination in the diabetes mellitus type 2 management after secondary oral antidiabetic drug failure

The purpose of the study was to find out differences between treatments of diabetes type 2 after secondary oral antidiabetic drug failure. Three different methods of treatment were compared: lispro insulin in combination with metformin, glimepiride and metformin combination or two daily doses of biphasic insulin 30/70 together with bed-time NPH insulin. The study included 87 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 randomly distributed into 3 different treatment groups. Fasting and postprandial glucose were analyzed by enzymatic colorimetric method and HbA1c was measured by ion exchange chromatography. HbA1c significantly decreased in all three study groups. The decrease was mostly expressed among patients treated with lispro and metformin. When focused on postprandial glucose control, antihyperglycemic metformin and insulin lispro therapy has greater impact on the overall metabolic control (decrease in level of HbA1c) in comparison with the above mentioned more traditional approaches.     

Risk of hypoglycemia following intensification of metformin treatment with insulin versus sulfonylurea

Background:

Hypoglycemia remains a common life-threatening event associated with diabetes treatment. We compared the risk of first or recurrent hypoglycemia event among metformin initiators who intensified treatment with insulin versus sulfonylurea.

Methods:

We assembled a retrospective cohort using databases of the Veterans Health Administration, Medicare and the National Death Index. Metformin initiators who intensified treatment with insulin or sulfonylurea were followed to either their first or recurrent hypoglycemia event using Cox proportional hazard models. Hypoglycemia was defined as hospital admission or an emergency department visit for hypoglycemia, or an outpatient blood glucose value of less than 3.3 mmol/L. We conducted additional analyses for risk of first hypoglycemia event, with death as the competing risk.

Results:

Among 178 341 metformin initiators, 2948 added insulin and 39 990 added sulfonylurea. Propensity score matching yielded 2436 patients taking metformin plus insulin and 12 180 taking metformin plus sulfonylurea. Patients took metformin for a median of 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 5–30) months, and the median glycated hemoglobin level was 8.1% (IQR 7.2%–9.9%) at intensification. In the group who added insulin, 121 first hypoglycemia events occurred, and 466 first events occurred in the group who added sulfonylurea (30.9 v. 24.6 events per 1000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.59). For recurrent hypoglycemia, there were 159 events in the insulin group and 585 events in the sulfonylurea group (39.1 v. 30.0 per 1000 person-years; adjusted HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12–1.72). In separate competing risk analyses, the adjusted HR for hypoglycemia was 1.28 (95% CI 1.04–1.56).

Interpretation:

Among patients using metformin who could use either insulin or sulfonylurea, the addition of insulin was associated with a higher risk of hypoglycemia than the addition of sulfonylurea. This finding should be considered by patients and clinicians when discussing the risks and benefits of adding insulin versus a sulfonylurea.Hypoglycemia remains one of the most common medication-related adverse events among patients with diabetes and a leading cause of hospital admissions and emergency department visits.^1,2 It is a concern to patients and clinicians and a strong determinant of treatment choices.³ Hypoglycemic medications account for 25% of emergency hospital admissions for adverse drug events among patients aged 65 years and older.^2,4 Multiple factors predispose patients with diabetes to hypoglycemia, including older age, polypharmacy, poor nutrition, underlying illness, alcohol use and declining renal function.^5,6 Intensive glucose-control treatment for patients with these factors is strongly associated with hypoglycemia.^6,7Consensus statements by major diabetes associations, including the Canadian Diabetes Association, recommend lifestyle modification and metformin as first-line therapies for type 2 diabetes, with the goal of treatment being a glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1C) level of 7% or less for many patients.^8,9 Multiple options are listed as acceptable add-on treatments. Sulfonylurea is easier to initiate, but insulin dose can be modified in response to daily variation in food intake, exercise or other variables that cause fluctuations in glucose values. Within the Veterans Health Administration clinical practice guideline, both the combination of metformin plus sulfonylurea or the use of bedtime insulin combined with metformin are considered acceptable based on level I evidence.¹⁰ To make well-informed decisions about treatment regimens, patients and providers need to understand clinical benefits, such as improvement in microvascular outcomes,¹¹ and harms, such as hypoglycemia.We recently reported that intensification of metformin with insulin compared with sulfonylurea was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality among veterans with diabetes.¹² Evidence for a causal relation between hypoglycemia and cardiovascular disease or death is limited, because patients at risk for hypoglycemia also have factors that increase their risk for those outcomes.^7,13–15 Both sulfonylurea and insulin are associated with an elevated risk of hypoglycemia compared with metformin.^5,7,16–18 We sought to test the hypothesis that using the combination of metformin plus insulin was associated with a greater risk of serious hypoglycemia than using metformin plus sulfonylurea.     

Superiority of insulin analogues versus human insulin in the treatment of diabetes mellitus

The modern goals of insulin replacement in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1, T2DM) are A1C <6.5% long-term, and prevention of hypoglycaemia (blood glucose, BG <70 mg/dl). In addition to appropriate education and motivation of diabetic subjects, the use of rapid- and long-acting insulin analogues, is critical to achieve these goals. The benefits of rapid-acting analogues (lispro, aspart and glulisine have similar pharmacodynamic effects) compared with non-modified human regular insulin, are: (a) lower 1- and 2-h post-prandial blood glucose; (b) lower risk of late post-prandial hypoglycaemia (and therefore lower BG variability); (c) better quality of life (greater flexibility in timing and dosing of insulin). In T1DM, rapid-acting analogues improve A1C only by the extent to which replacement of basal insulin is optimized at the same time, either by multiple daily NPH administrations, or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), or use of the long-acting insulin analogues glargine or detemir. In T2DM, rapid-acting analogues reduce post-prandial hyperglycaemia more than human regular insulin, but systematic studies are needed to examine the effects on A1C. The benefits of long-acting insulin analogues glargine and detemir vs. NPH, are: (1) lower fasting BG combined with lower risk of hypoglycaemia in the interprandial state (night); (2) lower variability of BG. Glargine and detemir differ in terms of potency and duration of action. Detemir should be given twice daily in the large majority of people with T1DM, and in a large percentage of subjects with T2DM as well, usually at doses greater vs those of the once daily glargine. However, when used appropriately for individual pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, glargine and detemir result into similar effects on BG, risk of hypoglycaemia and A1C. Rapid- and long-acting insulin analogues should always be combined in the treatment of T1 and T2DM.     

Characterization of the insulin resistance in liver cirrhosis: a comparison with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

To characterize the mechanisms of insulin resistance in liver cirrhosis (LC), we estimated the peripheral tissue sensitivity and responsiveness to insulin using the euglycemic clamp technique and determined the insulin binding to erythrocytes in patients with compensated LC as well as in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The insulin dose-response curves of the glucose metabolic clearance rates (MCR) were shifted to the right and downward both in patients with LC and NIDDM, indicating a reduced sensitivity and responsiveness to insulin. In the cirrhotics, MCR at the maximally effective insulin level, an index of insulin responsiveness, was correlated with fasting insulin levels (r = -0.57, P < 0.01) and sigma BG in 75 gOGTT (r = -0.43, P < 0.05), but no correlations were found between them and the diabetics. Although specific insulin bindings to erythrocytes were significantly lower in patients both with LC and NIDDM, Scatchard analysis revealed a significant decrease in the number of insulin receptors in the cirrhotics, and a decrease in the empty-site affinity in the diabetics. These findings suggest that insulin resistance in LC consists of a combination of binding and postbinding defects. The latter defect may be caused by basal hyperinsulinemia and contribute to the development of glucose intolerance. Although binding and postbinding abnormalities are also found in NIDDM, the mechanisms of insulin resistance in LC and NIDDM may be different.     

Comparison of high fibre diets,basal insulin supplements,and flexible insulin treatment for non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetics poorly controlled with sulphonylureas.

OBJECTIVE--To compare high fibre diet, basal insulin supplements and a regimen of insulin four times daily in non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetic patients who were poorly controlled with sulphonylureas. DESIGN--Run in period lasting 2-3 months during which self monitoring of glucose concentration was taught, followed by six months on a high fibre diet, followed by six months'' treatment with insulin in those patients who did not respond to the high fibre diet. SETTING--Teaching hospital diabetic clinics. PATIENTS--33 patients who had had diabetes for at least two years and had haemoglobin A1 concentrations over 10% despite receiving nearly maximum doses of oral hypoglycaemic agents. No absolute indications for treatment with insulin. INTERVENTIONS--During the high fibre diet daily fibre intake was increased by a mean of 16 g (95% confidence interval 12 to 20 g.) Twenty five patients were then started on once daily insulin. After three months 14 patients were started on four injections of insulin daily. ENDPOINT--Control of diabetes (haemoglobin A1 concentration less than or equal to 10% and fasting plasma glucose concentration less than or equal to 6 mmol/l) or completion of six months on insulin treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS-- No change in weight, diet, or concentrations of fasting glucose or haemoglobin A1 occurred during run in period. During high fibre diet there were no changes in haemoglobin A1 concentrations, but mean fasting glucose concentrations rose by 1.7 mmol/l (95% confidence interval 0.9 to 2.5, p less than 0.01). With once daily insulin mean concentrations of fasting plasma glucose fell from 12.6 to 7.6 mmol/l (p less than 0.001) and haemoglobin A1 from 14.6% to 11.2% (p less than 0.001). With insulin four times daily concentrations of haemoglobin A1 fell from 11.5% to 9.6% (p less than 0.02). Lipid concentrations were unchanged by high fibre diet. In patients receiving insulin the mean cholesterol concentrations fell from 7.1 to 6.4 mmol/l (p less than 0.0001), high density lipoprotein concentrations rose from 1.1 to 1.29 mmol/l (p less than 0.01), and triglyceride concentrations fell from 2.67 to 1.86 mmol/l (p less than 0.05). Patients taking insulin gained weight and those taking it four times daily gained an average of 4.2 kg. CONCLUSIONS--High fibre diets worsen control of diabetes in patients who are poorly controlled with oral hypoglycaemic agents. Maximum improvements in control of diabetes were achieved by taking insulin four times daily.     

Lipid metabolism in patients with insulin dependent diabetes. III. Effect of metabolic control of diabetes on the concentration of some blood serum lipid constituents in patients with insulin dependent diabetes]

The levels of the following blood serum lipid constituents: total cholesterol, triglycerides, phospholipids, HDL-cholesterol, lipoprotein fractions, as well as apolipoproteins AI, AII and B, have been determined in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes lasting from 3 months to 15 years in relation to the degree of metabolic control characterized by the levels of fructosamine and glycosylated hemoglobin HbA1c. The group of patients having the level of HbA1c exceeding 10% was characterized by significantly higher levels of cholesterol, triglycerides and Apo-B, and lower content of alpha-lipoprotein as compared to the group with HbA1c level beneath 10%. When fructosamine concentration was considered as an index of metabolic control of diabetes, it was found that the levels of cholesterol, phospholipids and apolipoproteins apo-A and apo-AI are highest in the group with the poor metabolic control and differ significantly from the respective values found in patients with mediocre and good metabolic control. Considering biological role of the individual lipids and lipoproteins, it should be stressed that the proper control of glycaemia is important for preventing the development of atherosclerosis in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes.     

Comparison of human versus porcine insulin in treatment of diabetes in children.

The blood glucose control obtained when using semi-synthetic monocomponent human insulin (insulin A) was compared with that using standard monocomponent porcine insulin (insulin B) in 14 children in a double blind crossover study. At the start of the study age, duration of diabetes, insulin dose, and daily carbohydrate intake were the same in both groups. After a one month run in period of standard treatment with porcine insulin the children were randomly divided into group 1 (three months of insulin A followed by three months of insulin B) and group 2 (three months of insulin B followed by three months of insulin A). During each treatment period blood glucose control was assessed by clinical symptoms, glycosylated haemoglobin, and home blood glucose monitoring. Although a significant difference in the period after lunch during 24 hour blood glucose profiles suggested a shorter onset time and faster peak action time of human insulin, no significant difference in the overall diabetic control was seen between the two types of insulin. There was a trend towards improved blood glucose control (irrespective of insulin) as the trial progressed. No clinical reactions to human insulin occurred, and there was no significant difference in the daily insulin dose between porcine and human insulin.     

Lipid metabolism in children and adolescents with insulin dependent diabetes. II. Evaluation of changes in lipoprotein A-I in children and adolescents with insulin dependent diabetes]

The levels of lipoprotein A-I (LP A-I) containing apolipoprotein A-I (apo A-I) and devoid of apolipoprotein A-II (apo A-II) have been determined in a group of 86 children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes of age between 1.3 and 22 years. The duration of diabetes in the studied group ranged between 0.25 and 15 years. The patients studied were further divided into subgroups taking into account the duration of diabetes as well as the occurrence of complications of diabetes, obesity and predisposition to early development of atherosclerosis in family history. The analysis of the results took into account the relations between the levels of LP A-I and other parameters of lipid metabolism like cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, apo A-I and apo A-II concentrations as well as the effectiveness of metabolic control of diabetes. LP A-I concentration was the lowest in group of children with diabetes lasting up to one year. This parameter was correlated positively with the levels of HDL-cholesterol and apo A-I, and negatively with HbA1c. It was not related to the coexisting complications, obesity or predisposition to atherosclerosis in family history. The above results indicate that the state of metabolic control of diabetes significantly influences the level of LP A-I. Considering the importance of LP A-I in preventing atherosclerosis it should be stressed that a decrease in its level during the period of prolonged hypoglycemia constitutes still another risk factor for development of atherosclerosis in diabetic children and adolescents.     

Adaptive regulation of beta-adrenergic receptors in children with insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

The beta-adrenergic receptors were investigated in partially purified mononucleal leukocytes (MNL) plasma membranes from 18 patients with IDDM in pediatric period, 9 healthy children and 8 normal adults. The decreased beta-adrenergic receptor number was seen in patients with IDDM (Bmax = 27.6 +/- 8.3 fM (125I) IHYP/mg protein) compared with normal children (Bmax = 40.4 +/- 10.4 fM (125I) IHYP/mg protein) and normal adults (Bmax = 36.9 +/- 6 fM (125I) IHYP/mg protein). MNL beta-receptor binding affinities (apparent Kd = 109.8 +/- 26.1 pM in IDDM, 102.8 +/- 46.6 pM in normal children, 130.0 +/- 43.1 pM in normal adults) did not differ. We divided the patients with IDDM into two groups based on their level of blood glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) when samples were taken. Group A IDDM (consisted of 9 diabetic patients with below 10% of HbA1) had markedly decreased beta-receptor numbers compared with group B IDDM (consisted of 9 diabetic patients with more than 10% of HbA1), whereas Kd was not significantly different. Also, there was negative correlation between Bmax and level of blood sugar or HbA1 in IDDM. This is the first report concerning the beta-adrenergic receptor in IDDM in pediatric period. We suggest that decreased Bmax in group B is a homeostatic response to restore the poorly-controlled hyperglycemic state to normoglycemia because the group B patients had high level of HbA1 and blood sugar.