Ethanol production in a continuous fermentation/membrane pervaporation system

The productivity of ethanol fermentation processes, predominantly based on batch operation in the U.S. fuel ethanol industry, could be improved by adoption of continuous processing technology. In this study, a conventional yeast fermentation was coupled to a flat-plate membrane pervaporation unit to recover continuously an enriched ethanol stream from the fermentation broth. The process employed a concentrated dextrose feed stream controlled by the flow rate of permeate from the pervaporation unit via liquid-level control in the fermentor. The pervaporation module contained 0.1 m² commercially available polydimethylsiloxane membrane and consistently produced a permeate of 20%–23% (w/w) ethanol while maintaining a level of 4%–6% ethanol in a stirred-tank fermentor. The system exhibited excellent operational stability. During continuous operation with cell densities of 15–23 g/l, ethanol productivities of 4.9–7.8 gl^–1 h^–1 were achieved utilizing feed streams of 269–619 g/l glucose. Pervaporation flux and ethanol selectivities were 0.31–0.79 lm^–2 h^–1 and 1.8–6.5 respectively.     

Ethanol production in an integrated process of fermentation and ethanol recovery by pervaporation

In ethanol fermentations inhibition of the microorganism by ethanol limits the amount of substrate in the feed that can be converted. In a process high feed concentrations are desirable to minimize the flows. Such high feed concentrations can be realized in integrated processes in which ethanol is recovered from the fermentation broth as it is formed. In this study ethanol recovery by pervaporation was coupled to glucose fermentations by baker's yeast. Pervaporation was carried out with commercial silicone based hollow-fibre membrane modules with relatively high fluxes. Three different types of process configurations with pervaporation were investigated. Two of these configurations also included cell retention by microfiltration, in order to optimize the productivity. In the systems with pervaporation a feed containing 360 kg/m³ glucose could be converted almost completely. This feed concentration is a factor three higher than in a process without ethanol recovery. The productivity was 14 kg/m³ h in a system with pervaporation only, and could be increased to 43 kg/m³ h in the system with all recycle by microfiltration. The kinetic data suggest that accumulation of inhibitory compounds occurs in the integrated system. The integrated process was relatively easy in operation.     

Modeling of an integrated fermentation/membrane extraction process for the production of 2-phenylethanol and 2-phenylethylacetate

An unstructured model for an integrated fermentation/membrane extraction process for the production of the aroma compounds 2-phenylethanol and 2-phenylethylacetate by Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS 600 was developed. The extent to which this model, based only on data from the conventional fermentation and separation processes, provided an estimation of the integrated process was evaluated. The effect of product inhibition on specific growth rate and on biomass yield by both aroma compounds was approximated by multivariate regression. Simulations of the respective submodels for fermentation and the separation process matched well with experimental results. With respect to the in situ product removal (ISPR) process, the effect of reduced product inhibition due to product removal on specific growth rate and biomass yield was predicted adequately by the model simulations. Overall product yields were increased considerably in this process (4.0 g/L 2-PE+2-PEA vs. 1.4 g/L in conventional fermentation) and were even higher than predicted by the model. To describe the effect of product concentration on product formation itself, the model was extended using results from the conventional and the ISPR process, thus agreement between model and experimental data improved notably. Therefore, this model can be a useful tool for the development and optimization of an efficient integrated bioprocess.     

Enzyme production in a cell recycle fermentation system evaluated by computer simulations

Enzyme production in a cell recycle fermentation system was studied by computer simulations, using a mathematical model of -amylase production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. The model was modified so as to enable simulation of enzyme production by hypothetical organisms having different production kinetics at different fermentation conditions important for growth and production. The simulations were designed as a two-level factorial assay, the factor studied being fermentation with or without cell recycling, repression of product synthesis by glucose, kinetic production constants, product degradation by a protease, mode of fermentation, and starch versus glucose as the substrate carbon source.The main factor of importance for ensuring high enzyme production was cell recycling. Product formation kinetics related to the stationary growth phase combined with continuous fermentation with cell recycling also had a positive impact. The effect was greatest when two or more of these three factors were present in combinations, none of them alone guaranteeing a good result. Product degradation by a protease decreased the amount of product obtained; however, when combined with cell recycling, the protease effect was overshadowed by the increased production. Simulation of this type should prove a useful tool for analyzing troublesome fermentations and for identifying production organisms for further study in integrated fermentation systems.List of Symbols a proportionality constant relating the specific growth rate to the logarithm of G (h) - a ₁ reaction order with respect to starch concentration - a ₂ reaction order with respect to glucose concentration - c starch concentration (g/l) - c ₀ starch concentration in the feed (g/l) - D dilution rate (h^–1) - e intrinsic intracellular amylase concentration (g product/g cell mass) - E extracellular amylase concentration (g/l) - F volumetric flow rate (l/h) - G average number of genome equivalents of DNA/cell - K ₁ intracellular repression constant - K ₂ intracellular repression constant - K _s Monod saturation constant (g/l) - k ₃ product excretion rate constant (h^–1) - k _I translation constant (g product/g mRNA/h) - k _d first order decay constant (h^–1) - k _dw first order decay constant (h^–1) - k _gl rate constant for glucose production (g/l/h) - k _{m, dgr} saturation constant for product degradation (g/l) - k _st rate constant for starch hydrolysis (g/l/h) - k _t1 proportionality constant for amylase production (g mRNA/g substrate) - k _t2 proportionality constant for amylase production (g mRNA *h/g substrate) - k _w protease excretion rate constant (h^–1) - k _wt1 proportionality constant for protease production (g mRNA/g substrate) - k _wt2 proportionality constant for protease production (g mRNA *h/g substrate) - k _wI translation constant (g protease/g mRNA/h) - m maintenance coefficient (g substrate/g cell mass/h) - n number of binding sites for the co-repressor on the cytoplasmic repressor - Q repression function, K₁/K₂ less than or equal to 1.0 - Q _w repression function, K₁/K₂ less than or equal to 1.0 - r intrinsic amylase mRNA concentration (g mRNA/g cell mass) - r _m intrinsic protease mRNA concentration (g mRNA/g cell mass) - R _ex retention by the filter of the compounds x=: C starch, E amylase, or S glucose - R _t amylase transport rate (g product/g cell mass/h) - R _wt protease transport rate (g protease/g cell mass/h) - R _s rate of glucose production (g/l/h) - R _c rate of starch hydrolysis (g/l/h) - S ₀ feed concentration of free reducing sugar (g/l) - s extracellular concentration of reducing sugar (g/l) - t time (h) - V volume (1) - w intracellular protease concentration (g/l) - W extracellular protease concentration (g/l) - X cell mass concentration (dry weight) (g/l) - Y yield coefficient (g cell mass/g substrate) - substrate uptake (g substrate/g cell mass/h) - specific growth rate of cell mass (h^–1) - _d specific death rate of cells (h^–1) - _m maximum specific growth rate of cell mass (h^–1) - _m,dgr maximum specific rate of amylase degradation (h^–1) This study was supported by the Nordic Industrial Foundation Bioprocess Engineering Programme and the Center for Process Biotechnology, The Technical University of Denmark.     

Ethanol fermentation and potential.

Ethyl alcohol is one of the United States and world's major chemicals. Beverage alcohol in the United States must be prepared from cereal grains or other natural products. The U.S. industrial alcohol market has remained relatively stable for several years at approximately 300 million gallons annually. Most of this has been produced synthetically from petroleum raw material (gas and oil). These raw materials are experiencing major price increases and are in short supply. The production of ethyl alcohol from cereal grains and cellulosic raw materials by fermentation is technically feasible and has been proven. Alcohol produced from all such materials is equal to synthetic alcohol in quality and performance. Competitive economics have controlled the basic raw materials used. The major potential new ethyl alcohol market is as a component of automobile fuels. A 10% alcohol-gasoline blend in the United States would annually require over 10 billion gallons of anhydrous alcohol. Use of alcohol for this purpose is technically feasible. However, alcohol has not been economically competitive to date.     

Ethanol production in solid substrate fermentation using thermotolerant yeast

A novel solid substrate fermentation system was used to produce fuel ethanol from sweet sorghum and sweet potato using a thermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain (VS3) and a local isolate of amylolytic Bacilllus sps. (VB9). The process was carried out on a laboratory scale using broth cultures. Alcohol produced was estimated by gas chromatography after an incubation time of 72 h at 37 and 42°C. More ethanol was produced in co-culture with a mixed substrate than with the thermotolerant yeast (VS3) alone. The maximum amount of ethanol produced in co-culture with a mixed substrate was 5 g/100 g of substrate at 37°C and 3·5 g/100 g of substrate at 42°C.     

Ethanol production from paper material using a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation system in a fed-batch basis

In this work, a recycled paper-derived feedstock was used to produce ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process using the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CECT 10875. At standard SSF conditions, the highest yield (about 80% of theoretical) was obtained at low substrate concentration and high enzyme loading. With increasing substrate concentration, mixing difficulties appeared which prevented an adequate SSF process performance and limited ethanol production. An SSF fed-batch procedure was then used which permitted an increase in substrate concentrations while maintaining SSF yields similar to that obtained at standard SSF, thus allowing an increased final ethanol production (about 18 g/l).     

Ethanol production from alfalfa fiber fractions by saccharification and fermentation

This work describes ethanol production from alfalfa fiber using separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) with and without liquid hot water (LHW) pretreatment. Candida shehatae FPL-702 produced 5 and 6.4 g/l ethanol with a yield of 0.25 and 0.16 g ethanol/g sugar respectively by SHF and SSF from alfalfa fiber without pretreatment. With LHW pretreatment using SSF, C. shehatae FPL-702 produced 18.0 g/l ethanol, a yield of 0.45 g ethanol/g sugar from cellulosic solids or ‘raffinate’. Using SHF, it produced 9.6 g/l ethanol, a yield of 0.47 g ethanol/g sugar from raffinate. However, the soluble extract fraction containing hemicelluloses was poorly fermented in both SHF and SSF due to the presence of inhibitors. Addition of dilute acid during LHW pretreatment of alfalfa fiber resulted in fractions that were poorly saccharified and fermented. These results show that unpretreated alfalfa fiber produced a lower ethanol yield. Although LHW pretreatment can increase ethanol production from raffinate fiber fractions, it does not increase production from the hemicellulosic and pectin fractions.     

Kinetics of ethanol production by baker's yeast in an integrated process of fermentation and microfiltration

The productivity of a fermentation is proportional to the biomass concentration. The productivity can therefore be increased by retention of the cells in the fermentor. In this study microfiltration was used for cell retention in a fermentation of glucose to ethanol by baker's yeast. Compared to a system without cell retention the productivity could be increased 12-fold to 55 kg/m³ h at a biomass concentration of 135 kg/m³. Maximal ethanol concentrations of 76 kg/m³ were obtained at conditions of growth. At zero growth conditions in the integrated system the ethanol concentration could be increased to about 115 kg/m³, and could be produced for at least 10 hours. The fermentation results in the integrated system could be described reasonably well with a mathematical model based on a different linear inhibition kinetics for growth and substrate consumption.     

Ethanol production and fermentation characteristics of recombinant saccharomyces cerevisiae strains grown on starch

The production of ethanol from starch has been investigated in three genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (YPG/AB, YPG/MM, and YPB-G). Two of the three strains produce the Aspergillus awamori glucoamylase together with either the Bacillus subtilis (YPG/AB) or the mouse (YPG/MM) α-amylase as separately secreted polypeptides. YPB-G, on the other hand, secretes a bifunctional fusion protein that contains both the B. subtilis α-amylase and the A. awamori glucoamylase activities. Substrate utilization, biomass growth, and ethanol production were all studied in both starch- and glucose-containing media. Much higher growth rates were found when any of the three strains were grown on glucose. YPG/AB showed the most efficient utilization of starch for ethanol production with the lowest levels of reducing sugars accumulating in the medium. The superior performance of YPG/AB as compared to YPB-G was found to correlate with its higher level of α-amylase activity. The ethanol production levels of YPG/AB in starch- and glucose-containing media were found to be comparable. YPB-G, which secretes the bifunctional fusion protein, could produce ethanol in media with starch concentrations above 100 g l⁻¹ while YPG/MM did not produce ethanol from starch because of its negligible secretion of glucoamylase.     

Ethanol production in an immobilized-cell reactor

Biomass can be converted to sugars by hydrolysis with enzymes or mineral acids. These sugars can be converted into a number of chemical intermediates in biological reactors. Biological reactions are generally slow and selection of the most efficient reactor is important in these applications. Immobilized-cell reactors allow high cell densities and high throughput by attaching the microorganisms to a fixed support. This paper examines the rate of production of ethanol from glucose by Saccharomyces cerevisia in a packed column. These rates are compared with those for the same reaction in a stirred reactor.     

Ethanol production in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose with temperature profiling

The effects of temperature on enzymatic saccharification of cellulose and simulataneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) were investigated with 100 g·l⁻¹ Solka Floc, 5g·l⁻¹Trichoderma reesei cellulase, and Zymomonas mobilis ATCC 29191. The following results were obtained: 1) Ethanol fermentation under glucose dificient conditions can proceed for more than 100 h at 30°C but gradually ceases after 50 h of operation at 40°C. 2) Equivalent glucose yield based on cellulose for SSF operated at its optimum temperature (37°C) is higher than that for enzymatic saccharification of cellulose at the same temperature by 32%. However, the same equivalent glucose yields were obtained for both processes if they were operated at their respective optimum temperature. 3) SSF with temperature cycling increased the ethanol productivity but gave similar ethanol yield to SSF at 37°C. 4) SSF with temperature profiling gave an ethanol yield of 0.32 g·g⁻¹ and cellulose use of 0.86 g·g⁻¹ which were increased by 39% and 34% over SSF with temperature cycling and at 37°C.     

Technology and economics of ethanol production from fodder beets via solid-phase fermentation

Summary Operating conditions for our semi-continuous, solid-phase fermentation system were optimized for conversion of fodder beets to fuel ethanol and distiller's wet feed (DWF). This information was then used to estimate operating parameters achievable in a commercial plant, and likely baseline production costs of such a plant. Initial acidification of pulp to pH 2.9–3.2 was effective in controlling bacterial contamination. The maximum operating capacity of the fermentor was approximately 92%, with 75% used for commercial application. A fermentation time of 24 h was sufficient to completely ferment the beet pulp to 8–9% (v/v) ethanol. Based on these parameters, a fodder beet cost of $19.25/metric ton ($17.50/ton), other operating and capital costs, and a PF credit of $0.14/L ($0.53/gal), ethanol production costs were estimated to be $0.49/L ($1.87/gal).     

Dissemination of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter spp. within an integrated commercial poultry production system

While characterizing the intestinal bacterial community of broiler chickens, we detected epsilon-proteobacterial DNA in the ilea of 3-day-old commercial broiler chicks (J. Lu, U. Idris, B. Harmon, C. Hofacre, J. J. Maurer, and M. D. Lee, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6816-6824, 2003). The sequences exhibited high levels of similarity to Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli sequences, suggesting that chickens can carry Campylobacter at a very young age. Campylobacter sp. was detected by PCR in all samples collected from the ilea of chicks that were 3 to 49 days old; however, it was detected only in the cecal contents of chickens that were at least 21 days old. In order to determine whether the presence of Campylobacter DNA in young chicks was due to ingestion of the bacteria in food or water, we obtained commercial broiler hatching eggs, which were incubated in a research facility until the chicks hatched. DNA sequencing of the amplicons resulting from Campylobacter-specific 16S PCR performed with the ileal, cecal, and yolk contents of the day-of-hatching chicks revealed that Campylobacter DNA was present before the chicks consumed food or water. The 16S rRNA sequences exhibited 99% similarity to C. jejuni and C. coli sequences and 95 to 98% similarity to sequences of other thermophilic Campylobacter species, such as C. lari and C. upsaliensis. The presence of C. coli DNA was detected by specific PCR in the samples from chicks obtained from a commercial hatchery; however, no Campylobacter was detected by culturing. In order to determine whether the same strains of bacteria were present in multiple levels of the integrator, we cultured Campylobacter sp. from a flock of broiler breeders and their 6-week-old progeny that resided on a commercial broiler farm. The broiler breeders had been given fluoroquinolone antibiotics, and we sought to determine whether the same fluoroquinolone-resistant strain was present in their progeny. The isolates were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, which confirmed that the parental and progeny flocks contained the same strain of fluoroquinolone-resistant C. coli. These data indicate that resistant C. coli can be present in multiple levels of an integrated poultry system and demonstrated that molecular techniques or more sensitive culture methods may be necessary to detect early colonization by Campylobacter in broiler chicks.     

Ethanol production during batch fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae: changes in glycolytic enzymes and internal pH.

During batch fermentation, the rate of ethanol production per milligram of cell protein is maximal for a brief period early in this process and declines progressively as ethanol accumulates in the surrounding broth. Our studies demonstrate that the removal of this accumulated ethanol does not immediately restore fermentative activity, and they provide evidence that the decline in metabolic rate is due to physiological changes (including possible ethanol damage) rather than to the presence of ethanol. Several potential causes for the decline in fermentative activity have been investigated. Viability remained at or above 90%, internal pH remained near neutrality, and the specific activities of the glycolytic and alcohologenic enzymes (measured in vitro) remained high throughout batch fermentation. None of these factors appears to be causally related to the fall in fermentative activity during batch fermentation.     

Ethanol fermentation in an immobilized cell reactor using Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Fermentation of sugar by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, for production of ethanol in an immobilized cell reactor (ICR) was successfully carried out to improve the performance of the fermentation process. The fermentation set-up was comprised of a column packed with beads of immobilized cells. The immobilization of S. cerevisiae was simply performed by the enriched cells cultured media harvested at exponential growth phase. The fixed cell loaded ICR was carried out at initial stage of operation and the cell was entrapped by calcium alginate. The production of ethanol was steady after 24 h of operation. The concentration of ethanol was affected by the media flow rates and residence time distribution from 2 to 7 h. In addition, batch fermentation was carried out with 50 g/l glucose concentration. Subsequently, the ethanol productions and the reactor productivities of batch fermentation and immobilized cells were compared. In batch fermentation, sugar consumption and ethanol production obtained were 99.6% and 12.5% v/v after 27 h while in the ICR, 88.2% and 16.7% v/v were obtained with 6 h retention time. Nearly 5% ethanol production was achieved with high glucose concentration (150 g/l) at 6 h retention time. A yield of 38% was obtained with 150 g/l glucose. The yield was improved approximately 27% on ICR and a 24 h fermentation time was reduced to 7 h. The cell growth rate was based on the Monod rate equation. The kinetic constants (K(s) and mu(m)) of batch fermentation were 2.3 g/l and 0.35 g/lh, respectively. The maximum yield of biomass on substrate (Y(X-S)) and the maximum yield of product on substrate (Y(P-S)) in batch fermentations were 50.8% and 31.2% respectively. Productivity of the ICR were 1.3, 2.3, and 2.8 g/lh for 25, 35, 50 g/l of glucose concentration, respectively. The productivity of ethanol in batch fermentation with 50 g/l glucose was calculated as 0.29 g/lh. Maximum production of ethanol in ICR when compared to batch reactor has shown to increase approximately 10-fold. The performance of the two reactors was compared and a respective rate model was proposed. The present research has shown that high sugar concentration (150 g/l) in the ICR column was successfully converted to ethanol. The achieved results in ICR with high substrate concentration are promising for scale up operation. The proposed model can be used to design a lager scale ICR column for production of high ethanol concentration.     

Performance comparison of ethanol and butanol production in a continuous and closed-circulating fermentation system with membrane bioreactor

Since both ethanol and butanol fermentations are urgently developed processes with the biofuel-demand increasing, performance comparison of aerobic ethanol fermentation and anerobic butanol fermentation in a continuous and closed-circulating fermentation (CCCF) system was necessary to achieve their fermentation characteristics and further optimize the fermentation process. Fermentation and pervaporation parameters including the average cell concentration, glucose consumption rate, cumulated production concentration, product flux, and separation factor of ethanol fermentation were 11.45?g/L, 3.70?g/L/h, 655.83?g/L, 378.5?g/m²/h, and 4.83, respectively, the corresponding parameters of butanol fermentation were 2.19?g/L, 0.61?g/L/h, 28.03?g/L, 58.56?g/m²/h, and 10.62, respectively. Profiles of fermentation and pervaporation parameters indicated that the intensity and efficiency of ethanol fermentation was higher than butanol fermentation, but the stability of butanol fermentation was superior to ethanol fermentation. Although the two fermentation processes had different features, the performance indicated the application prospect of both ethanol and butanol production by the CCCF system.     

酿酒酵母和克鲁维酵母发酵菊芋生产燃料乙醇

为获得菌株发酵菊芋生产燃料乙醇的最佳方案,首先选取实验室保存的重组菌株R32对其产酶条件进行优化,其最高产菊粉酶活性为298.8 U· mL-1,此时的最佳培养基配方为:YPG培养基为酵母粉1％ (w/v),蛋白胨2％ (w/v),甘油0.5％ (v/v);YPM培养基为酵母粉1％ (w/v),蛋白胨2％ (w/v),甲醇1％(v/v);培养基pH为自然初始pH.然后选取酿酒酵母S.c和克鲁维酵母Klu,比较是否在添加重组菌株R32粗酶液条件下,两株酵母菌分别进行单独发酵和混合发酵时的产乙醇能力,以获得最佳的发酵组合.结果表明,酿酒酵母S.c和克鲁维酵母Klu在未添加重组菌株R32粗酶液时,混合一步发酵获得的乙醇含量较高,发酵84 h时乙醇含量为11.37％.添加重组菌株R32粗酶液进行两步发酵时,2株酵母菌混合发酵72 h时,乙醇含量为11.43％.2种发酵组合的最高乙醇含量以及各个发酵参数基本相同,虽然一步法发酵时间延长,但节省成本,操作简单,更适宜工业生产应用.最后对其进行正交试验优化,培养条件为菊粉浓度225 g· L-1,脲素浓度40 g·L-1,接种量15％,pH为5时,酿酒酵母菌S.c和克鲁维酵母Klu混合一步发酵法的最高乙醇体积比达11.82％.     

Ethanol production during D-xylose,L-arabinose,and D-ribose fermentation by Bacteroides polypragmatus

Summary The specific growth rate () during cultivation of Bacteroides polypragmatus in 2.51 batch cultures in 4–5% (w/v) l-arabinose medium was 0.23 h^-1 while that in either d-xylose or d-ribose medium was lower (=0.19 h^-1). Whereas growth on arabinose or xylose occurred after about 6–8 h lag period, growth on ribose commenced after a 30 h lag phase. The maximum substrate utilization rate for arabinose, ribose and xylose in media with an initial substrate concentration of 4–5% (w/v) was 0.77, 0.76, and 0.60 g/l/h respectively. In medium containing a mixture of glucose, arabinose, and xylose, the utilization of all three substrates occurred concurrently. The maximum amount of ethanol produced after 72 h growth in 4–5% (w/v) of arabinose, xylose, and ribose was 9.4, 6.5, and 5.3 g/l, respectively. The matabolic end products (mol/mol substrate) of growth in 4.4% (w/v) xylose medium were 0.73 ethanol, 0.49 acetate, 1.39 CO₂, 1.05 H₂, and 0.09 butyrate.National Research Council of Canada No. 23406