Synchronization of estrus after treatment with Luprostiol in beef cows and in beef and dairy heifers

Four trials were conducted to study synchronous estrous response in beef cows and in beef and dairy heifers to Luprostiol (13, thia-PG-F(2)alpha analog) in comparison with other prostaglandin products. In Trial 1, 60 virgin beef heifers were observed for estrus for 5 d and artificially inseminated. Heifers not observed in estrus within 5 d were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg Luprostiol or 25 mg Lutalyse. In Trial 2, 75 multiparous, lactating beef cows were randomly assigned to receive either 15 mg Luprostiol, 25 mg Lutalyse or 500 mcg Estrumate. All cows received a second injection of the respective treatment 11 d later. In Trial 3, 96 multiparous, lactating beef cows were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg Luprostiol or 25 mg Lutalyse. All cows received a second injection of the respective treatment 11 d later. In Trial 4, virgin dairy heifers were palpated per rectum. Seventy-seven heifers with a palpable corpus luteum (CL) were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg Luprostiol or 500 mcg Estrumate. In all trials animals were artificially inseminated 12 h following observed estrus. Estrous response during the 5-d synchronized period was 44% for Luprostiol and 42% for Lutalyse treated heifers in Trial 1. It was 52, 56 and 60%, respectively, for Luprostiol, Lutalyse and Estrumate treated cows in Trial 2; 23% for Luprostiol and 19% for Lutalyse treated cows in Trial 3; and 68% for Luprostiol and 70% for Estrumate treated heifers in Trial 4. Treatment with Luprostiol results in a similar synchronous estrous response as with the other prostaglandin products used in these studies.     

Control of estrus and pregnancy in dairy heifers treated with Syncro-Mate-B

Control of estrus in dairy heifers with Syncro-Mate-B was evaluated in five experiments with a total of 393 Holstein heifers. Estradiol-17β at implant removal or gonadotropin releasing hormone 40 hr after implant removal did not cause any beneficial effect on fertility. In heifers implanted on selected days of the estrous cycle, 88.3% of heifers treated with SMB only were in estrus within 5 days of implant removal and fertility was not significantly different from that of control heifers. In heifers implanted at random stages of the estrous cycle, estrus occurred within 5 days of implant removal in 88.7% of 159 SMB treated heifers. First service conception rates (heifers pregnant of heifers inseminated) and pregnancy rates (heifers pregnant of heifers assigned) were 72.7% and 60.8% for heifers inseminated 8 to 16 hr after estrus within 5 days of implant removal, 55.0% and 55.0% for heifers inseminated 48 hr after implant removal without regard to estrus and 71.6% and 67.1% for control heifers inseminated over a 25 day period.     

Pregnancy rate in peripuberal beef heifers following treatment with syncro-mate-B and gonadotropin releasing-hormone

A study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) and gonadotropin releasing-hormone (GnRH) on inducing a fertile estrus and/or ovulation in peripuberal beef heifers. Two hundred and twenty-three, 13 to 15 month peripuberal beef heifers, primarily of Angus or Simmental breeding, were alternately allotted by weight and age within breed to a non-treated control group (C) and three groups which received the SMB treatment regime. Treated groups differed in that one group was inseminated approximately 12 hr after detected in estrus (T) while two other groups were inseminated at a fixed time after implant removal (T-G-I42, T-I48). Heifers in group T-G-I42 received 125 mug GnRH at 30 hr, and were inseminated 42 hr after implant removal. The remaining group of SMB-treated heifers received no additional hormone therapy but were inseminated 48 hr after implant removal (T-I48). Age had no significant effect on estrous response or pregnancy rate nor were there significant age by weight interactions on these parameters. Weight was a significant source of variation on interval from start of breeding to pregnancy (P<.01) and the effect on interval to estrus approached statistical significance (P<.0.9). In control heifers, increased weight had a positive effect on estrous response during the first 21 days of breeding (P<.05). Conversely, weight had no effect on estrous response during the 5-day synchronized period in heifers treated with SMB and observed for estrus (group T). Cumulative estrous response in control heifers was 10, 47, 48 and 55% in 5, 21, 27 and 45 days of breeding, respectively. Cumulative estrous response in SMB-treated heifers obsrved for estrus (group T) was 88, 91, 91 and 91% in 5, 21, 27 and 45 days of breeding, respectively. Pregnancy rate after 5 days of breeding was 9, 27, 18 and 30% for heifers in groups C, T, T-G-I42 and T-I48, respectively. Pregnancy rate after 21 days of breeding for heirfers in groups C, T, T-G-I42 and T-I48, respectively, was 33, 38, 21 and 41%; after 27 days of breeding was 36, 43, 40 and 48%; after 45 days of breeding was 48, 61, 51 and 69% and after the total 88-day breeding season was 59, 68, 71 and 72%. While a large percentage of peripuberal beef heifers with adequate age but insufficient weight were induced into estrus with the SMB treatment, pregnancy rates were low. Timed insemination programs with or without GnRH do not appear to be effective in improving pregnancy response in non-cyclic beef heifers.     

Comparison of timed insemination with insemination at estrus following synchronization of estrus with a MGA-prostaglandin system in beef heifers

Three trials utilizing 231 beef heifers were conducted in 1993 to determine if a timed insemination would result in similar synchronized pregnancy rates as insemination by estrus following synchronization of estrus using the 14-d MGA-prostaglandin system. All heifers were fed 0.5 mg MGA/h/d fof 14 d and given a 25 mg injection of PGF(2)alpha im 17 d after the final day of MGA feeding. Heifers in Group 1 (timed AI treatment) were inseminated at 72 h after the prostaglandin injection independent of whether or not they were observed in estrus. Heifers in Group 2 (AI by estrus) were inseminated 12 to 18 h after the onset of estrus. Since the trial was a significant source of variation for synchronized pregnancy rate, the effect of treatment on pregnancy rate was analyzed for each trial. Synchronized pregnancy rates in Trials 2 and 3 were similar in both treatment groups; 37 vs 35% and 61 vs 58% for the timed AI vs AI by estrus (Groups 1 and 2) in Trials 2 and 3, respectively. In both of these trials the degree of estrous synchrony was high. In Trial 1, the synchronized pregnancy rate in heifers that were time-inseminated was significantly lower than that of heifers that were inseminated by estrus (29 vs 57%). The lower synchronized pregnancy rate of Group 1 (timed AI) heifers in Trial 1 appeared to be due to the low degree of estrous synchrony in this trial. Our results indicate that using timed insemination with the 14-d MGA-prostaglandin system will give similar synchronized pregnancy rates as inseminating by estrus in groups of beef heifers where the degree of synchrony is high. However, in heifers where the degree of estrous synchrony is low, a timed insemination reduces synchronized pregnancy rates.     

Factors influencing estrus and conception in dairy heifers after prostaglandin F2-alpha

The influence of interval between insemination (AI) and estrus on subsequent fertility of PGF(2alpha)-treated (two injections of 25 mg, 11 days apart) heifers was assessed in two experiments. In Experiment I, 240 heifers were allotted to Control (AI 8 to 16 hr after estrus detection), PGF(2alpha)-E (AI 8 to 16 hr after estrus within five days of second PGF(2alpha)) or PGF(2alpha)-T (AI 80 hr after second PGF(2alpha)). In Experiment II, 130 heifers were assigned to control (AI as before) or PGF(2alpha) (AI 72 or 80 hr after second PGF(2alpha)) with half the PGF(2alpha) heifers receiving 100 mug GnRH 72 hr after first PGF(2alpha). Heifers of both experiments that were bred at a predetermined time were arrayed by interval from AI to estrus. Conception rates of heifers detected in estrus from 32 hr before AI to 24 hr after AI did not differ (x(2)=3.35, df=5, P>0.5). The percentage of GnRH-treated heifers in estrus within five days (81.8%) was not (P>0.75) greater than those not receiving GnRH (77.3%) but they had higher (P<0.05) serum progesterone (P(4)) concentration at second PGF(2alpha) (3.17 vs 2.41 ng/ml). When P(4) values were arrayed for both groups at 1 ng intervals, the percentage of heifers exhibiting estrus increased with increasing P(4) level (P<0.05).     

Short synchronization system for estrus cycles in dairy heifers: a preliminary report

In previous studies we demonstrated that the administration of a luteolytic dose of cloprostenol to dairy cows in luteal phase, followed by hCG plus estradiol benzoate (EB) 12 h later, led to successful timed AI 48 h after the initiation of treatment. This article reports two consecutive studies. In Study 1 we determined the pregnancy rate of dairy heifers in luteal phase (established by palpation per rectum) treated with cloprostenol followed by 250 IU of hCG plus 1 mg of EB 12 h later, and inseminated 48 h after cloprostenol injection. Study 2 was designed to evaluate the efficiency this synchronization protocol, irrespective of the estrus stage of the animals. In Study 1, 1272 Friesian heifers aged 14 to 16 months with a palpable corpus luteum received 500 mcg cloprostenol. Heifers were then synchronized either according to the hCG plus EB protocol (hCG-EB, n=637), or by a second dose of cloprostenol 11 d later (PG, n=636). Animals in this last group served as controls and were inseminated 72 and 96 h after the second cloprostenol injection. The pregnancy rate was significantly higher (P<0.0001) in the hCG-EB group (59.5%, 379/637) than in PG (44.8%, 285/636). In Study 2, 135 contemporary heifers (with no corresponding information on estrus stage) were subjected to the same protocol as those in the hCG-EB group of Study 1. These animals were classified in retrospect according to estrus stage established by plasma progesterone concentration. Pregnancy rates were 66.7% (24/36), 51% (25/49) and 58% (29/50) for animals in the follicular, early/late luteal, and mid-luteal phase, respectively. The total pregnancy rate was 57.8% (78/135). These findings indicate an improved pregnancy rate for heifers subjected to single insemination after cloprostenol/hCG/EB synchronization, compared to double insemination after synchronization by 2 cloprostenol injections 11 d apart. The cloprostenol/hCG/EB protocol did result in acceptable pregnancy rates after timed AI of dairy heifers regardless of their estrus cycle phase.     

Artificial insemination of subtropical commercial beef cattle following synchronization with cloprostenol (ICI 80996): II. Estrous response

Data collected from two controlled breeding field trials involving 561 Bos indicus x Bos taurus cows and heifers were analyzed for estrous and fertility response following a cloprostenol ICI-80, 996 (CLP) synchronization regime. Fertility data were discussed in a companion paper (1). In Trial 1, 128 animals were assigned to four treatments: 1) controls which were inseminated at the naturally occurring estrus; 2) Animals artificially inseminated at approximately 72 hr and 96 hr following a second CLP; 3) Animals artificially inseminated at approximately 72 hr following a second CLP; and 4) Animals artificially inseminated approximately 12 hr after detection of estrus post-second CLP. Trial II included 391 heifers distributed among six treatments: 1) Artificially inseminated between 70 and 90 hr post-second CLP; 2) Sham inseminated between 70 and 90 hr post-second CLP; 3) Processed with no manipulation of the genital tract between 70 and 90 hr post-second CLP; 4) Artificially inseminated approximately 12 hr after the detection of estrus following a second CLP; 5) Artificially inseminated at the naturally occurring estrus and 6) Non-treated heifers exposed to fertile bulls. Cloprostenol ICI-80996 was effective (P < .01) in synchronizing estrus in comparisons of treated vs non-treated controls in Trials I and II (82 vs 29%; 57 vs 19%, respectively). However, a significant reduction in the expression of estrus was observed following Timed AI when compared to heifers bred 12 hr after detection of CLP-induced estrus in Trial II (37 vs 54%, P < .05). The authors conclude that a single timed insemination of Brahman crossbred heifers suppresses the behavioral expression of estrus. Other evidence (1) indicates that the fertility during this period is similarly reduced.     

Reproductive performance of postpartum dairy cows under a highly intervenient breeding program involving timed insemination and combinations of GnRH, prostaglandin F2alpha and human chorionic gonadotropin

Lactating Holstein cows (n=288) were grouped as pairs at parturition and randomly assigned to two treatments (control, C vs intervenient treatment, T). The reproductive management of the Group C cows (n=130) consisted of the intramuscular administration of 500 microg PGF2alpha analogue (PG) on Days 28 and 63 postpartum and breeding on the basis of estrus signs with the a.m.-p.m. rule after Day 63. Cows that were not bred by 77 d postpartum received another injection of PG and were bred at estrus or 84 h after PG treatment. Pregnancy diagnoses were perfomed by palpation of the uterus per rectum 42 to 48 d after AI. Cows in the T group (n=139) received intramuscular injections of 100 microg GnRH 14 d and PG 28 d after calving. On Day 56 postpartum, cows were given a second dose of GnRH followed by PG on Day 63 postpartum and a third GnRH injection 48 h after PG (OvSynch). Cows were inseminated at a fixed time (22+/-1 h) after GnRH. Five days after the fixed-time insemination cows were given 1500 IU hCG i.m.. Group C and T cows that returned to service or were diagnosed as non-pregnant continued to receive PG at intervals of 14 d with breeding at estrus or 84 h after the second PGF2alpha dose. A sustained increase in milk progesterone concentration was observed in 59.0% of T cows after GnRH administration on Day 14. A similar rise in milk progesterone concentrations was observed in 53.8% of C cows. The PG on Day 28 induced luteolysis more in Group T cows (53.2%) than in Group C cows (36.9%). The PG on Day 63 reduced milk progesterone concentrations to basal levels in 50.7% of T and 49.2% of Group C animals. The first service pregnancy rates (T, 40.3% vs C, 36.2%) and the overall pregnancy rates (all services, T, 83.5% vs C, 86.9%) were not different between the two groups. The two treatments did not differ in the interval from first service to pregnancy, calving to pregnancy or in calving interval, number of services per pregnancy or culling rates.     

The use of estradiol and/or GnRH in a two-dose PGF protocol for breeding management of beef heifers

The objective was to determine reproductive performance following AI in beef heifers given estradiol to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and estradiol or GnRH to synchronize ovulation in a two-dose PGF-based protocol. In Experiment 1, 561 cycling (confirmed by ultrasonography), Angus heifers received 500 microg cloprostenol, i.m. (PGF) twice, 14 days apart (days 0 and 14) and were equally allocated to four groups in a 2 x 2 factorial design. On Day 7, heifers received either 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 50 mg progesterone (P), i.m. in oil (EBP group) or no treatment (NT group). Half the heifers in each group received 1mg EB, i.m. in oil on Day 15 (24h after the second PGF treatment) with TAI 28 h later (52 h after PGF), and the other half received 100 microg GnRH, i.m. on Day 17 (72 h after PGF) concurrent with TAI. All heifers were observed for estrus twice daily from days 13 to 17; those detected in estrus more than 16 h before scheduled TAI were inseminated 4-16 h later and considered nonpregnant to TAI. Overall pregnancy rate (approximately 35 days after AI) was higher in heifers that received EBP than those that did not (61.6% versus 48.2%, respectively; P < 0.002); but was lower in heifers that received EB after PGF than those that received GnRH (50.0% versus 59.8%; P < 0.02). Although estrus was detected prior to TAI in 77 of 279 heifers (27.6%) treated with EBP (presumably due to induced luteolysis), they were inseminated and 53.2% became pregnant. Overall pregnancy rates were 51.4, 68.3, 45.0, and 55.0% in the NT/GnRH, EBP/GnRH, NT/EB, and EBP/EB groups, respectively (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, 401 cycling, Angus heifers were used. The design was identical to Experiment 1, except that 1.5mg estradiol-17beta (E-17beta) plus 50mg progesterone (E-17betaP) and 1mg E-17beta were used in lieu of EBP and EB, respectively. All heifers receiving E-17beta 24h after the second injection of PGF (NT/E-17beta and E-17betaP/E-17beta) were TAI 28 h later without estrus detection, i.e. 52 h after PGF. Heifers in the other two groups received 100 microg GnRH, i.m. 72 h after PGF and were concurrently TAI; heifers in these two groups that were detected in estrus prior to this time were inseminated 4-12h later and considered nonpregnant to TAI. Estrus rate during the first 72 h after the second PGF treatment was higher (P < 0.05) in the E-17betaP/GnRH group (45.0%; n = 100) than in the NT/GnRH group (16.0%; n = 100), but conception rate following estrus detection and AI was not different (mean, 57.4%; P = 0.50). Overall pregnancy rate was not significantly different among groups (mean, 46.9%; P = 0.32). In summary, the use of EB or E-17beta to synchronize follicular wave emergence and estradiol or GnRH to synchronize ovulation in a two-dose, PGF-based protocol resulted in acceptable fertility to TAI. However, when 2mg EB was used to synchronize follicular wave emergence, early estrus occurred in approximately 28% of heifers, necessitating additional estrus detection. A combination of estrus detection and timed-AI in a two-dose PGF protocol resulted in highly acceptable pregnancy rates.     

A two injection schedule with prostaglandin F2alpha for the regulation of the ovulatory cycle of cattle

Thirty randomly cycling Holstein heifers were given two injections of prostaglandin F_2α 10 days apart, to determine whether this treatment would cause most of the animals to show estrus shortly after the second injection. Twenty-five of the 30 heifers (83%) were in estrus and inseminated 2 to 4 days following the second injection and 10 of the 25 (40%) were pregnant at 60 days post insemination. Thirteen of 15 control heifers (87%) were detected in estrus over a 3 week period and seven of the 13 (54%) were pregnant at 60 days. Chi square analysis indicated that the proportion of animals showing estrus and subsequent pregnancy in the treated and in the control groups were not significantly different. The two injection system may have commercial application for the regulation of the ovulatory cycle of cattle.     

Synchronization of estrus in virgin beef heifers using melengestrol acetate and PGF2alpha: an efficacy comparison of cloprostenol and dinoprost tromethamine

This study compared the efficacy of two sources of PGF2alpha on the reproductive performance of virgin beef heifers, after synchronization of estrus using melengestrol acetate (MGA) and PGF2alpha. Angus-based heifers (n = 1002) in five herds were fed 0.5 mg per head per day of MGA for 14 days. Nineteen days after the last day of MGA feeding, heifers were randomly assigned to receive (i.m.) either 0.5 mg cloprostenol (n = 504; Estrumate, E) or 25 mg dinoprost tromethamine (n = 498; Lutalyse, L) as a source of exogenous PGF2alpha. Heifers were observed twice daily for 5 days for signs of estrus and artificially inseminated 8-12 h later, except in herd A, wherein animals not detected in estrus by 80 h after PGF2alpha were mass-mated and no longer monitored for signs of estrus. Estrumate and Lutalyse were equally (P > 0.1) effective among all response variables evaluated, including estrus response (E, 89% and L, 86%), conception rate (E, 67% and L, 67%), and synchronized pregnancy rate (E, 61% and L, 57%). Synchrony of estrus was not affected (P > 0.1) by PGF2alpha source, and peak estrus response occurred 60 h post-PGF for both treatments. Conception rate to timed insemination was not different (P > 0.1) among Estrumate- and Lutalyse-treated heifers within herd A (14%, 4/28 and 7%, 2/29, respectively). Herd had a significant (P < 0.05) effect on all indicators of reproductive performance. Conception rates within herds A and D were influenced by technician (P < 0.05), however, this effect was balanced across treatments and no treatment by technician interaction was detected. In conclusion, when administered 19 days after a 14-day MGA feeding period, cloprostenol and dinoprost tromethamine are equally efficacious for synchronous induction of a fertile estrus in virgin beef heifers.     

Response of dairy heifers to Prostaglandin F2alpha after treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin

After the observation of estrus following administration of Prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)), 79 dairy heifers were randomly either injected with 2500 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 48 h postestrus or maintained as controls with no injection at that time. Five to 9 d later, after a blood sample for progesterone determination was taken, all heifers were injected with 25 mg of PGF(2alpha). Heifers observed in estrus within the next 5 d were inseminated about 12 h after initial observation and were palpated for pregnancy 45 to 60 d postinsemination. Heifers treated with hCG had higher progesterone concentrations, reduced and delayed estrual responses, and lower insemination fertility rates when compared with control heifers.     

Comparison of controlled internal drug release device and melengesterol acetate as progestin sources in an estrous synchronization protocol for beef heifers

The objectives of this experiment were to compare estrous synchronization responses and AI pregnancy rates of beef heifers using protocols that included either CIDR or MGA as the progestin source. The hypotheses tested were that: (1) estrous synchronization responses after (a) progestin removal, and (b) PGF(2alpha); and, (2) AI pregnancy rates, do not differ between heifers synchronized with either progestin source. At the start of the experiment (Day 0) in both years, heifers were assigned randomly to receive, MGA supplement for 14 days (MGA-treated; n=79) or CIDR for 14 days (CIDR-treated; n=77). On Day 14 progestin was removed and heifers were observed for estrus up to and after PGF(2alpha) on Days 31 and 33 for CIDR-treated and MGA-treated heifers, respectively. Heifers that exhibited estrus within 60h after PGF(2alpha) were inseminated by AI 12h later; the remaining heifers were inseminated at 72h after PGF(2alpha) and given GnRH (100mug). More (P<0.05) CIDR-treated heifers exhibited estrus within 120h after progestin removal than MGA-treated heifers. Intervals to estrus after progestin removal were shorter (P<0.05) for CIDR-treated heifers than MGA-treated heifers. More (P<0.05) CIDR-treated heifers exhibited estrus and were inseminated within 60h after PGF(2alpha) than MGA-treated heifers. Pregnancy rates did not differ (P>0.10) between MGA-treated (66%) and CIDR-treated (62%) heifers. In conclusion, the use of CIDR as a progestin source in a 14-day progestin, PGF(2alpha), and timed AI and GnRH estrous synchronization protocol was as effective as the use of MGA to synchronize estrus and generate AI pregnancies in beef heifers.     

Comparison of pregnancy rates of repeat-breeder dairy cows given gonadotropin releasing hormone at or prior to the time of insemination

A total of 585 repeat-breeder dairy cows was used to study the effect of GnRH treatment, either at or prior to insemination, on the pregnancy rate. The cows were divided into 6 treatment groups. Cows in Group 1 (n = 142) were observed in estrus, and 11 +/- 0.42 hours (mean +/- SEM) later they were given 100 ug, i.m. gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) and were inseminated. Cows in Group 2 (n = 139) were observed in estrus and were inseminated 11.4 +/- 0.43 hours later. Cows in Group 3 (n = 33) were monitored for estrus with an activated heatmount detector but were not observed in estrus; they were inseminated 1.5 +/- 0.87 hours later and were given 100 ug, i.m. GnRH. Cows in Group 4 (n = 35) were not observed in estrus, but they did activate the heatmount detector and were inseminated 2.2 +/- 0.87 hours later. Cows in Group 5 (n = 107) were observed in estrus, given 100 ug, i.m. GnRH 2.0 +/- 0.40 hours later, and were inseminated 9 +/- 0.60 hours after GnRH treatment. Cows in Group 6 (n = 129) were observed in estrus and were inseminated 10 +/- 0.50 hours later. Pregnancy rates were analyzed by Chi-square. Interactions between pregnancy rate, treatment and time of insemination were evaluated using ANOVA and LSM (P < 0.05). There was no effect on pregnancy rate when GnRH was given at or prior to insemination. Cows inseminated on the basis of observed estrus had a higher pregnancy rate (P < 0.05) than cows inseminated on the observation of an activated heatmount detector. From the results of this study, it is concluded that treatment with GnRH at or prior to insemination did not improve the pregnancy rate of repeat-breeder dairy cows.     

The use of GnRH or estradiol to facilitate fixed-time insemination in an MGA-based synchronization regimen in beef cattle

Two experiments were conducted to compare pregnancy rates when GnRH or estradiol were given to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in an MGA-based estrus synchronization program. Crossbred beef cattle were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA, 0.5 mg per day) for 7 days (designated days 0-6, without regard to stage of the estrous cycle) and given cloprostenol (PGF; 500 microg intramuscular (im)) on day 7. In Experiment 1, lactating beef cows (n=140) and pubertal heifers (n=40) were randomly allocated to three groups to receive 100 microg gonadorelin (GnRH), 5 mg estradiol-17beta and 100 mg progesterone (E+P) in canola oil or no treatment (control) on day 0. All cattle were observed for estrus every 12 h from 36 to 96 h after PGF. Cattle in the GnRH group that were detected in estrus 36 or 48 h after PGF were inseminated 12 h later; the remainder were given 100 microg GnRH im 72 h after PGF and concurrently inseminated. Cattle in the E+P group were randomly assigned to receive either 0.5 or 1.0 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) in 2 ml canola oil im 24 h after PGF and were inseminated 30 h later. Cattle in the control group were inseminated 12 h after the first detection of estrus; if not in estrus by 72 h after PGF, they were given 100 microg GnRH im and concurrently inseminated. In the absence of significant differences, all data for heifers and for cows were combined and the 0.5 and 1.0 mg EB groups were combined into a single estradiol group. Estrus rates were 57.6, 57.4 and 60.0% for the GnRH, E+P and control groups, respectively (P=0.95). The mean (+/-S.D.) interval from PGF treatment to estrus was shorter (P<0.001) and less variable (P<0.001) in the E+P group (49.0+/-6.1 h) than in either the GnRH (64.2+/-15.9 h) or control (66.3+/-13.3 h) groups. Overall pregnancy rates were higher (P<0.005) in the GnRH (57.6%) and E+P (55.7%) groups than in the control group (30.0%) as were pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI (47.5, 55.7 and 28.3%, respectively). In Experiment 2, 122 crossbred beef heifers were given either 100 microg GnRH or 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone in oil on day 0 and subsequently received either 100 microg GnRH 36 h after PGF and inseminated 14 h later or 1 mg EB im 24 h after PGF and inseminated 28 h later in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Pregnancy rates were not significantly different among groups (41.9, 32.2, 33.3 and 36.7% in GnRH/GnRH, GnRH/EB, EB/GnRH and EB/EB groups, respectively). In conclusion, GnRH or estradiol given to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in an MGA-based synchronization regimen resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates to fixed-time insemination.     

Estrus synchronization and pregnancy rates in cyclic and noncyclic beef cows and heifers treated with syncro-mate B or Norgestomet and Alfaprostol

Postpartum lactating cows (N=118) and virgin heifers (N=60) were treated with subcutaneous Norgestomet implants for nine days and received either an intramuscular injection (im) of 5 mg estradiol valerate and 3 mg Norgestomet at the time of implant insertion or an im injection of 5 mg Alfaprostol 24 hr before implant removal. Animals were artificially inseminated 12 hr after detection of estrus. Of the cows and heifers, 78% and 88%, respectively, were in estrus within five days after implant removal (P<0.09). There was no difference between treatments in the proportion of animals in estrus or in the timing of estrus (P<0.85). Estrus was detected in a greater (P<0.05) proportion of animals that were cyclic prior to treatment (88%) than among those that were anestrous prior to treatment (77%). Pregnancy rates after five days were similar between heifers that were cyclic (42%) or anestrous (47%) prior to treatment; however, the five-day pregnancy rate in cows that were anestrous prior to treatment was 38% lower than that in cows that were cyclic prior to treatment (17 vs 55%, P<0.01). Although the treatments synchronized or induced estrus in both cyclic and anestrous animals, marked variability in estrous response and fertility among previously cyclic or anestrous postpartum cows limited the effectiveness of the treatments.     

Effect of stage of the estrous cycle on interval to estrus after PGF(2alpha) in beef cattle

Effect of stage of the estrous cycle at the time of prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) injection on subsequent reproductive events in beef females was studied in four trials involving 194 animals. Cycling animals were given two injections of 25 mg PGF(2alpha) 11 days apart or, in some cases, the interval was altered to allow the second injection to fall on a specific day of the cycle. Day of estrous cycle at time of the second injection was determined by estrous detection. Interval from the second PGF(2alpha) injection to the onset of estrus (interval to estrus) was shorter (P<.01) in heifers than in cows. Both cows and heifers injected on days 5 to 9 (early cycle) had a shorter (P<.01) interval to estrus (estrus = day 0) than did those injected on days 10 to 15 (late cycle). Conception rate was lower (P<.05) for early-cycle heifers than for late-cycle heifers inseminated by appointment at 80 hours. There was no significant difference in conception rate of early-or late-cycle heifers or cows inseminated according to estrous detection or early- or late-cycle cows inseminated at 80 hours. Progesterone concentrations in blood samples collected in heifers at 4-hour intervals after the second PGF(2alpha) injection on either day 7 or day 14 declined linearly (P<.05) through 36 hours. Day of the estrous cycle at PGF(2alpha) injection had no effect on rate of progesterone decline, even though heifers injected on day 7 had a shorter (P<.05) interval to estrus. All animals whose cycle length was not affected by the second PGF(2alpha) injection were treated on days 5 through 8 of the cycle, indicating that PGF(2alpha) was less effective in regressing the corpus luteum between days 4 and 9 of the cycle than later in the cycle.     

Use of short-term progestin treatment to resynchronize the second estrus following synchronized breeding in beef heifers

Two trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of short-term progestin administration to resynchronize the second estrus after artificial insemination in yearling beef heifers. In Trial 1 crossbred yearling heifers (n = 208) were synchronized with Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) and artificially inseminated (AI) between 48 and 54 h following implant removal. Implant removal is defined as Day 1. Following AI, the heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups. Group 1 heifers were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA) daily from Day 17 to 21 at a rate of 0.5 mg/head, while Group 2 control received no exogenous progestin during this period. Synchrony of estrus was defined as the 3-d period in which the highest number of heifers expressed behavioral estrus in each group. There was no difference (P < 0.05) in the pregnancy rate during the second estrus due to MGA supplementation. More MGA-treated heifers (P < 0.01) expressed estrus in a 3-d period than the controls. In Trial 2, yearling heifers (n = 108) were synchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) (second PGF(2alpha) injection is designated as Day 1) administered 14 d apart with AI 12 h after the onset of behavioral estrus. The heifers were then randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 treatment groups after initial AI: 1) MGA fed at 0.5 mg/head daily from Days 17 to 21; 2) norgestomet administered in 6.0-mg implants from Days 17 to 21; 3) untreated control heifers. Blood samples were collected on Day 21 and analyzed for progesterone (P(4)). Elevated P(4) (> 1 ng/ml) on Day 21 indicated pregnancy to the first insemination. Synchrony among the 3 groups of heifers was similar (P > 0.10); however, the second estrus was less (P < 0.05) variable in the MGA and norgestomet treated heifers. During the resynchronized second estrus, conception rates were not affected by progestin treatment (MGA 40%, norgestomet 64%, and control 62%; P > 0.10). However, a proportion of heifers treated MGA 10% 4 36 and norgestomet 3% 1 36 expressed behavioral estrus during second estrus even though they were diagnosed as pregnant from first service by elevated P(4) levels on Day 21. We conclude that short-term use of progestin from Days 17 to 21 following AI causes closer synchrony of estrus; however, inseminating pregnant heifers that exhibit behavioral estrus may cause abortion.     

Effect of beta-carotene supplementation on reproductive performance of dairy heifers

Three trials were conducted to determine the effect of feeding supplemental beta-carotene on reproductive performance of Holstein heifers. In each trial, the animals were randomly assigned to either a control or treatment group. Animals in the treatment groups received 300 mg supplemental beta-carotene daily for the test periods which varied from 6 to 8 weeks in length. To facilitate sample collections and observations, estrus was synchronized with two injections of 25 mg PGF(2alpha) at 11 day intervals. The first injection was after 2 weeks of feeding supplemental beta-carotene. Blood serum beta-carotene concentrations were higher in the heifers fed supplemental beta-carotene as compared to concentrations in control heifers after 1 week of feeding and this difference increased throughout the test periods. The interval from the second injection of PGF(2alpha) to onset of estrus was shorter in the control heifers as compared to that interval in heifers supplemented with beta-carotene (trial 1,44.0 vs 56.0 hr; trial 2, 51.3 vs 70.8 hr; trial 3, 40.7 vs 62.5 hr, respectively). The intervals from PGF(2alpha) administration to the preovulatory LH peak (43.3 vs 61.5 hr) and ovulation (69.3 vs 85.9 hr) were also shorter in the control heifers in trial 3. No significant differences were found among treatments in the number of heifers that expressed estrus, the blood serum progesterone concentrations or the conception rates in any of the three trials.     

Comparison of pregnancy rates with two estrus synchronization protocols in Italian Mediterranean Buffalo cows

The aim in this study was to compare two estrus synchronization protocols in buffaloes. Animals were divided into two groups: Group A (n=111) received 100 microg GnRH on Day 0, 375 microg PGF(2alpha) on Day 7 and 100 microg GnRH on Day 9 (Ovsynch); Group B (n=117) received an intravaginal drug release device (PRID) containing 1.55 g progesterone and a capsule with 10mg estradiol benzoate for 10 days and were treated with a luteolytic dose of PGF(2alpha) and 1000 IU PMSG at the time of PRID withdrawal. Animals were inseminated twice 18 and 42 h after the second injection of GnRH (Group A) and 60 and 84 h after PGF(2alpha) and PMSG injections (Group B). Progesterone (P(4)) concentrations in milk samples collected 12 and 2 days before treatments were used to determine cyclic and non-cyclic buffaloes, and milk P(4) concentrations 10 days after Artificial insemination (AI) were used as an index of a functional corpus luteum. Cows were palpated per rectum at 40 and 90 days after AI to determine pregnancies. All previously non-cyclic animals in Group B had elevated P(4) (>120 pg/ml milk whey) on Day 10 after AI. Accordingly, a greater (P<0.01) relative percentage of animals with elevated P(4) 10 days after AI were observed in Group B (93.2%) than in Group A (81.1%). However, there was no difference in overall pregnancy rates between the two estrus synchronization protocols (Group A, 36.0%; Group B 28.2%). When only animals with elevated P(4) on Day 10 after AI were considered, pregnancy rate was higher (P<0.05) for animals in Group A (44.4%) than Group B (30.3%). The findings indicated that treatment with PRID can induce ovulation in non-cyclic buffalo cows. However, synchronization of estrus with Ovsynch resulted in a higher pregnancy rate compared with synchronization with PRID, particularly in cyclic buffalo.