咪达唑仑用于上肢创伤病人麻醉前给药的遗忘作用与脑电变化

目的：评价咪达唑仑用于上肢创伤病人行高位硬膜外阻滞的遗忘作用和相应的脑电变化.方法：选择40例单纯上肢创伤病人行高位硬膜外阻滞随机双盲分为四组：咪达唑仑0.15mg/kg和0.10mg/kg,安定0.20mg/kg,生理盐水2ml,麻醉前30分钟肌注,观察用药前后脑电改变,镇静分级对麻醉操作的遗忘率和程度以及术后心理状况.结果：用咪达唑仑后,镇静程度与遗忘效果有显著变化.0.10mg/kg咪达唑仑的遗忘率为70%,其中90%为不全遗忘;0.15mg/kg咪达唑仑可达到100%完全遗忘;咪达唑仑的脑电功率谱变化为δ和β相对功率明显增加,而θ和α相对功率明显下降.结论：肌注咪达唑仑完全可以消除病人对高位硬膜外麻醉穿刺操作过程的不良回忆,并与剂量相关.     

右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于肠镜检查患者镇静效果比较

目的:比较右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于肠镜检查患者效果比较。方法:肠镜检查的患者60例,随机分为两组:D组静脉输注右美托咪定0.6μg/kg,M组静脉输注咪达唑仑0.08 mg/kg,均用生理盐水10 mL稀释,10 min输注完毕后进行肠镜检查。观察患者血流动力学指标及呼吸指标的变化,是否完成肠镜,患者的满意度以及检查过程中的不良反应。结果:右美托咪定组所有患者镇静满意,均能很好耐受肠镜检查,并且检查过程中MAP、HR和SpO2稳定(P0.05)。咪达唑仑组镇静时有轻度呼吸抑制,肠镜检查过程中MAP和HR升高(P0.05),插管耐受率低于右美托咪定组(P0.05)。结论:右美托咪定用于肠镜镇静有效,无呼吸抑制,血流动力学稳定,是理想的辅助药。     

右美托咪啶与咪达唑仑在重症破伤风患者镇静中效果比较

目的:比较右美托咪啶与咪达唑仑用于重症破伤风患者镇静中效果。方法:选取2012年1月~2015年12月间在我院治疗的重症破伤风患者72例,通过随机数表法分为右美托咪啶组与咪达唑仑组,各36例,给予右美托咪啶组静脉泵入右美托咪啶1μg/kg持续时间为10 min,之后以0.3~0.6μg/kg进行维持,咪达唑仑组静脉泵入咪达唑仑0.05 mg/kg,持续时间为1 min,之后以0.02~0.1/kg·h进行维持。监测两组患者用药前及用药12 h后平均动脉压(MAP)、呼吸频率(RR)、血氧饱和度(SpO_2)和心率(HR)深用Ramasy评分法评估镇静程度。结果:两组患者治疗后HR、RR、MAP水平明显降低而SpO_2明显上升且右美托咪啶组HR、RR、及SpO_2改善更显著差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);两组用药后4 h、8 h、12 h时Ramasy评分在组间、组内比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);右美托咪啶组不良反应发生率为5.56%,低于咪达唑仑组的16.67%,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论右美托咪啶有助于维持患者血流动力学的稳定减少重症破伤风患者心动过速、心率增快、呼吸抑制等不良反应情况的发生。     

丙泊酚与咪哒唑仑复合氯胺酮用于小儿心导管术麻醉效果研究

目的:探讨丙泊酚与咪哒唑仑复合氯胺酮用于小儿心导管术麻醉的优缺点与安全性。方法:将2008年7月~2012年7月入住我院的100例行心导管术的先心病患儿按照抽签法随机地均分为A、B组,A组采用6 mg/(kg·h)丙泊酚+3 mg/(kg·h)氯胺酮维持,B组采用0.15 mg/(kg·h)咪达唑仑+3 mg/(kg·h)氯胺酮维持,比较两组麻醉效果、HR、SPO2、MAP、体动次数、停药唤醒时间及不良反应发生率。结果:对照组麻醉优良率为80.00%,小于观察组(100.00%)(P0.05);两组术前MAP、HR差异无统计学意义(P0.05),但股动脉穿刺时二者差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),两组术中SPO2差异无统计学意义(P0.05),两组体动次数、停药唤醒时间相比,具有统计学差异(P0.05,P0.01);对照组不良反应发生率为24.00%,明显大于观察组(10.00%),两组相比,差异具有显著的统计学意义(P0.01)。结论:咪哒唑仑复合氯胺酮用于小儿心导管术麻醉效果显著,安全性高,值得在临床上加以推广并应用。     

右美托咪定联合不同剂量咪达唑仑对非小细胞肺癌手术患者血流动力学和炎症介质、认知功能的影响

摘要 目的：探讨右美托咪定联合不同剂量咪达唑仑对非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）手术患者血流动力学和术后炎症介质、认知功能的影响。方法：纳入2019年1月-2021年2月期间来郑州大学第一附属医院接受手术治疗的NSCLC患者（n=120）,按照麻醉方案的不同分为低剂量组（n=60）和高剂量组（n=60）,两组均予以右美托咪定,在此基础上,低剂量组予以0.05 mg/kg咪达唑仑,高剂量组予以0.10 mg/kg咪达唑仑。对比两组患者的血流动力学、炎症介质、认知功能、苏醒质量和不良反应发生率。结果：两组麻醉诱导后10 min（T1）~拔管后5 min（T3）时间点心率（HR）、平均动脉压（MAP）升高后下降,且拔管即刻（T2）、T3时间点高剂量组低于低剂量组（P<0.05）。高剂量组的苏醒后疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）评分低于低剂量组,睁眼时间、拔管时间、麻醉恢复室（PACU）停留时间均短于低剂量组（P<0.05）。两组术前、术后3 d、术后7 d白介素-1（IL-1）、C反应蛋白（CRP）、肿瘤坏死因子-α（TNF-α）升高后下降,且术后3 d、术后7 d高剂量组低于低剂量组（P<0.05）。两组术后1 d、术后3 d、术后7 d简易精神状态量表（MMSE）评分组间对比未见统计学差异（P>0.05）。两组不良反应发生率组间对比无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论：与0.05 mg/kg咪达唑仑相比,右美托咪联合0.10 mg/kg咪达唑仑定用于NSCLC手术患者,维持血流动力学稳定、提高苏醒质量、减轻炎症应激的效果更为显著,且不增加认知功能损害和不良反应发生率。     

口服咪达唑仑对儿童术前分离焦虑的效果分析

目的:明确与父母分离焦虑在不同年龄段小儿的发生率,并探讨术前口服咪达唑仑对减轻患儿术前焦虑的效果。方法:募集442例年龄12岁的非心脏手术患儿,分为咪达唑仑组和对照组,每组再按照年龄分为五个年龄段。咪达唑仑组患儿术前30分钟给予0.5 mg/kg咪达唑仑口服;对照组则未予任何制剂。观察并比较不同年龄段患儿入手术室与家长分离时的情况。结果:药物组分离焦虑发生率显著低于对照组。在各年龄组中,8个月到3岁的婴幼儿是发生分离焦虑比例最高的年龄段。对照组分离焦虑的发生率为16.94%,研究组为8%,较对照组有显著下降(P0.05)。此外,研究组小于8个月和3-5岁组患儿发生分离焦虑的比例也均较未用药组有显著下降(P0.05)。结论:分离焦虑与患儿年龄相关,低龄患儿在手术前有明显的分离焦虑,术前30分钟口服咪达唑仑0.5 mg/kg能显著改善分离时的焦虑,但不能完全消除。     

咪达唑仑复合舒芬太尼在机械通气患者中的镇静效果观察

目的观察咪达唑仑复合舒芬太尼在机械通气患者中的镇静效果。方法将2013年10月~2014年5月在ICU行机械通气患者68例按照入院时间顺序进行分组,前34例为对照组,后34例为观察组。观察组应用咪达唑仑复合舒芬太尼,对照组仅使用咪达唑仑,并对两组效果进行比较分析。结果咪达唑仑复合舒芬太尼的镇静作用强,起效时间短,对呼吸、循环等重要系统影响小,患者生命体征平稳,躁动发生少,减少了机械通气人机对抗的发生,减少了使用呼吸机天数。而单纯用咪达唑仑的镇静效果浅,躁动及人机对抗的发生率较高。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论咪达唑仑复合舒芬太尼用于机械通气患者能达到理想的镇静效果,安全性高,值得临床应用。     

右美托咪定与咪达唑仑对前列腺电切术患者术后认知功能的影响

目的:分析右美托咪定与咪达唑仑对前列腺电切术(TURP)患者认知功能的影响。方法:选择2013年5月-2015年5月在我院接受TURP治疗的良性前列腺增生患者73例作为研究对象。根据麻醉方法不同,将所选患者分为右美托咪定组和咪达唑仑组,分别采用右美托咪定和咪达唑仑麻醉。观察并比较不同时间点两组患者的心率(HR)及平均动脉压(MAP)的变化情况。应用精神状态量表(MMSE)评估两组患者手术前后的认知功能。结果:两组患者术前HR及MAP比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者手术不同时间点HR、MAP均显著低于术前,且右美托咪定组低于咪达唑仑组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者术前MMSE评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者术后MMSE评分均低于术前,且右美托咪定组低于咪达唑仑组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);右美托咪定组术中寒战发生率显著低于咪达唑仑组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:右美托咪定与咪达唑仑对TURP患者均会造成早期认知功能障碍,但右美托咪定的影响较小,患者生命体征较平稳,值得临床推广应用。     

异氟烷单独或联合咪达唑仑对7日龄大鼠大脑caspase-3表达的影响

目的 观察异氟烷单独或联合咪达唑仑对7日龄大鼠大脑caspase-3表达的影响.方法 7日龄SD大鼠39只,随机分为对照组(C组,n=13),异氟烷组(I组,n=13)和咪达唑仑联合异氟烷组(MI组,n=13).C组:腹腔注射0.9%生理盐水10ml/kg,吸入30%O2 6 h;I组:在37℃恒温并通入1.5%异氟烷的麻醉小室内维持麻醉6h ;MI组:腹腔注射咪达唑仑9 mg/kg后,随即置于37℃恒温并通入1.5%异氟烷的麻醉小室内维持麻醉6h.麻醉结束即刻每组取3只大鼠,行动脉血气分析.麻醉结束2h 采用Realtime-PCR方法检测皮质和海马组织Caspase-3 mRNA水平的变化;并用免疫组织化学SABC法检测大脑Active caspase-3阳性神经细胞的分布情况,计数阳性细胞.结果 ⑴ I组和MI组大鼠麻醉结束即刻动脉血气分析结果与C组比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).⑵ Realtime-PCR 结果显示,I组与MI组大鼠皮质和海马区Caspase-3 mRNA与对照组相比表达增多,且MI组与I组比较Caspase-3 mRNA表达增加(P<0.05).⑶免疫组化结果也显示:与对照组相比,I组与MI组大鼠在皮质、海马及丘脑部位Active caspase-3阳性神经细胞数量均明显增多 (P<0.05),而MI组与I组相比,在海马和丘脑部位Active caspase-3阳性神经细胞数量明显增多(P<0.05).结论 异氟烷麻醉能诱导脑发育高峰期大鼠重要脑区Caspase-3表达增加,联合应用咪达唑仑增加更明显;推测Caspase-3表达增加可能引起凋亡级联反应,导致神经细胞凋亡增加.     

内科胸腔镜手术局麻时辅助镇静镇痛药效果的评估

为了评估局麻辅助镇静下开展内科胸腔镜手术的镇静镇痛效果及不良反应,本研究分析了单纯局麻下进行内科胸腔镜手术的患者137例(A组)和局麻辅助镇静镇痛下进行内科胸腔镜手术的患者412例(B组)的镇静镇痛效果及不良反应。B组术前单次静脉推注药物,给予舒芬太尼(0.15～0.2μg/kg)和咪达唑仑(0.03～0.05 mg/kg)辅助镇痛镇静,达镇静深度为OAA/SⅢ级后进行手术。记录两组患者术中和术后的心率、呼吸、Bp、Sp O2、VAS评分、不良反应。手术开始后的10 min、20 min、40 min A组患者的HR、RR、MAP均明显高于B组患者和同组术后(p0.05)。B组患者术中和术后各时间点比较HR、RR、MAP差异无统计学意义(p0.05)。手术中各时间点的VAS评分,B组患者的评分明显低于A组患者(p0.05),B组患者术后各时间点的VAS评分均低于A组患者,但仅于术后2 h VAS评分的降低有统计学意义(p0.05)。术后A组要求镇痛人次明显多于B组(p0.05)。整个手术过程中B组患者OAA/S评分维持在3.3±0.5,控制在OAA/S镇静Ⅲ级水平。研究表明咪达唑仑联合舒芬太尼用于内科胸腔镜手术局麻时辅助镇静、镇痛效果好并且安全,确实减轻患者痛苦。我们认为咪达唑仑和舒芬太尼宜从小剂量开始,术中适量追加,镇静深度控制在OAA/S镇静Ⅲ级水平为宜。     

Comparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation during plastic surgery

A randomized double-blind study was designed to compare midazolam, a rapid-acting water-soluble benzodiazepine, with diazepam for sedation when administered as an adjuvant to ketamine during local anesthesia. In the preliminary dose-ranging study, midazolam (0.05 to 0.15 mg/kg IV) was found to produce a spectrum of central nervous system activity (e.g., sedation, amnesia) that was similar to diazepam (0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg IV). However, the slope of midazolam's dose-response curve for sedation appeared to be steeper (i.e., a narrower therapeutic dosage range). In a comparative evaluation of their relative sedative-amnestic properties and recovery characteristics, the median effective doses of the two benzodiazepines were compared. Midazolam (0.1 mg/kg IV) was found to produce more profound sedation and amnesia than diazepam (0.2 mg/kg IV). Midazolam was associated with significantly less pain on injection and a lower incidence of postoperative venoirritation. Overall patient acceptance was higher with midazolam compared to diazepam. Finally, recovery characteristics were similar for the two benzodiazepines in our outpatient setting.     

Nociceptive Transmission to Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex – Comparison of Sedative and Analgesic Effects

CO₂-laser C-fibre evoked cortical potentials (LCEPs) is a potentially useful animal model for studies of pain mechanisms. A potential confounding factor when assessing analgesic effects of systemically administered drugs using LCEP is sedation. This study aims to clarify: 1) the relation between level of anaesthesia and magnitude of LCEP, 2) the effects of a sedative and an analgesic on LCEP and dominant EEG frequency 3) the effects of a sedative and analgesic on LCEP when dominant EEG frequency is kept stable. LCEP and EEG were recorded in isoflurane/nitrous-oxide anaesthetized rats. Increasing isoflurane level gradually reduced LCEPs and lowered dominant EEG frequencies. Systemic midazolam (10 μmol/kg) profoundly reduced LCEP (19% of control) and lowered dominant EEG frequency. Similarly, morphine 1 and 3 mg/kg reduced LCEP (39%, 12% of control, respectively) and decreased EEG frequency. When keeping the dominant EEG frequency stable, midazolam caused no significant change of LCEP. Under these premises, morphine at 3 mg/kg, but not 1 mg/kg, caused a significant LCEP reduction (26% of control). In conclusion, the present data indicate that the sedative effects should be accounted for when assessing the analgesic effects of drug. Furthermore, it is suggested that LCEP, given that changes in EEG induced by sedation are compensated for, can provide information about the analgesic properties of systemically administrated drugs.     

Sedative and cardiovascular effects of midazolam in swine.

The ability to reliably produce sedation in swine is hampered by the paucity of agents available. This project examined the use of a new water soluble benzodiazepine, midazolam, as a sedative in swine. Echocardiographic studies were performed on thirty 23 to 30 kg Yorkshire swine before and 20 minutes after each animal received a single intramuscular dose of 100 micrograms/kg midazolam. Heart rate and respiratory rate decreased significantly compared to nonsedated values (93 +/- 7 versus 117 +/- 2 bpm and 10 +/- 1 versus 20 +/- 1 breaths/min, respectively [p less than 0.05]). However, there was no effect on left ventricular fractional shortening (29.9 greater than 0.05 versus 29.5 +/- 0.05% [p greater than 0.05]). An additional five pigs were instrumented for a dose response study in order to collect hemodynamic data and blood gas values at baseline, and 15 min after the intravenous administration of incremental doses of midazolam (100 to 1,000 micrograms/kg). Despite a significant decrease in heart rate and respiratory rate, cardiac output, blood gases, and pH remained within normal ranges at all dosage levels. Both routes of administration produced sedation for 20 min in all animals. Midazolam is an effective swine sedative that is associated with stable cardiac function.     

Clinical evaluation of combination of dexmedetomidine and midazolam vs. dexmedetomidine alone for sedation during spinal anesthesia

BackgroundDexmedetomidine is a useful sedative agent for spinal anesthesia. However, it has been reported to decreases heart rate in a dose-dependent manner. In the present study, we compared the bolus dose of midazolam and bolus loaded dexmedetomidine over 10 min to determine additional sedation methods.MethodsA total of 100 patients who were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II undergoing spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. In the combination of midazolam and dexmedetomidine group (group MD), 10 min after bolus loading of 0.05 mg/kg midazolam, 0.5 μg/kg/h dexmedetomidine was infused. In the dexmedetomidine group (group D), 1 μg/kg bolus dose of dexmedetomidine was infused over 10 min, and then 0.5 μg/kg/h dexmedetomidine was infused continuously.ResultsAt 10 min, the sedation depth of the two groups was approximately the same. In both groups, the bispectral index (BIS) was within the optimal range of 55–80 and the Ramsay Sedation Scale score was within the optimal range of 3–5. Both patient and surgeon satisfaction with sedation did not differ between groups. At 10 min, heart rate (beats/min) was significantly lower (P < .01) in group D and mean blood pressure (mm Hg) was significantly lower (P < .01) in group MD. The prevalence of bradycardia (P = .714), hypotension (P = .089), and hypoxia (P = .495) did not differ statistically between the two groups.ConclusionsMidazolam bolus and dexmedetomidine continuous infusion may be a useful additional sedation method for patients who have severe bradycardia.     

Comparison of the discriminative stimulus effects of midazolam after intracranial and peripheral administration in the rat.

Rats were trained in a two-lever drug discrimination paradigm to discriminate midazolam (0.32 mg/kg, i.p. or 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) from the no-drug condition. After completion of i.p. and s.c. midazolam generalization gradients (0.032-1.0 mg/kg), rats were surgically implanted with unilateral cannulae into the lateral ventricles. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) doses of 1.1-44.2 micrograms midazolam were delivered to unrestrained rats. Midazolam produced dose-dependent increases in drug-appropriate responding by all three routes of administration, but was 2.4- to 4.3-fold more potent when given i.c.v. than when given s.c. or i.p. Midazolam, over the dose range tested, did not produce substantial decreases in response rate by any route of administration. The discriminative-stimulus effect of i.c.v. midazolam was blocked by peripherally administered flumazenil, and such antagonism was surmounted by a 2- to 5-fold increase in the i.c.v. midazolam dose. Taken together, these data suggest that the discriminative-stimulus effects of midazolam are mediated via central benzodiazepine (BZ) receptors.     

Investigation of changes in EEG complexity during memory retrieval: the effect of midazolam

The aim of this study is applying nonlinear methods to assess changes in brain dynamics in a placebo-controlled study of midazolam-induced amnesia. Subjects injected with saline and midazolam during study, performed old/new recognition memory tests with EEG recording. Based on previous studies, as midazolam causes anterograde amnesia, we expected that midazolam would affect the EEG’s degree of complexity. Recurrence quantification analysis, and approximate entropy were used in this assessment. These methods compare with other nonlinear techniques such as computation of the correlation dimension, are suitable for non-stationary EEG signals. Our findings suggest that EEG’s complexity decreases during memory retrieval. Although this trend is observed in nonlinear curves related to the midazolam condition, the overall complexity were greater than in the saline condition. This result implies that impaired memory function caused by midazolam is associated with greater EEG’s complexity compared to normal memory retrieval in saline injection.     

The effect of ontogenetic development on the anticonvulsant activity of midazolam.

The anticonvulsant effects and duration of protective action of midazolam against Metrazol induced seizures were studied in 528 rats aged 7,12,18,25 and 90 days. The doses of 0.025, 0.05, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg were administered immediately before Metrazol (100 mg/kg in all but 18-day-old animals where 90 mg/kg were given) for detection of antimetrazol activity at all age groups. The doses of 0.05, 0.25, and/or 0.5 mg/kg were used to study the time course of the protective action of midazolam. Each experimental group consisted of eight animals. Dose-dependent antimetrazol effects of midazolam till now described only in adult animals were demonstrated at all developmental stages studied. There were no qualitative differences in these effects among age groups studied. Midazolam action was better expressed against major Metrazol seizures than against minimal Metrazol seizures. Duration of the protective action depended on the dose tested at all developmental stages, as a rule, lasted longer in young animals than in adult rats. Only quantitative changes of action were found.     

小剂量右美托咪定用于局麻下玻璃体切割术的镇静效果观察

目的：探讨右美托咪定用于局麻下玻璃体切割术的镇静效果。方法：选择拟在局麻监测下行玻璃体切割术患者50 例为研究对象,年龄20-72岁,ASA 分级Ⅱ级~Ⅲ级,随机分为右美托咪定组（D组）和咪达唑仑组（M 组）,每组25 例。D组患者于术前10min 静脉泵注右美托咪定0.5 滋g/kg,后以0.2-0.4 μg/kg.h 的速度持续输注,M组术前10 min 缓慢静脉注射咪达唑仑0.02 mg/kg,术中按需静注0.5 mg/ 次。维持VAS 评分≤ 4 分,Ramsay评分2-4 分。记录和比较两组患者术中血压、心率、呼吸的变化、辅助用药及患者对镇静效果的满意度。结果：给药后,M组T5时点MAP较T0显著下降（P〈0.05）,D组T10及以后各时点MAP 较T0显著下降（P〈0.05）;D 组T5及以后各时点BP 较T0显著下降（P〈0.05）,但组间及M 组组内BP 比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）;M 组T30时点HR 较T0 显著下降（P〈0.01）,而在T5时,组间比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）,即D 组下降更为显著。给药后各时点,D 组VAS 评分均显著低于M组（P〈0.05）,30 min 时达最低。两组Ramsay镇静评分给药后5 min 均达2 级以上,与给药前比较均显著升高（P〈0.05）,D组给药后30 min 及以后各时点Ramsay镇静评分均显著高于M组（P〈0.01）。给药后各时点,两组组内和组间SPO2和RR 比较均无统计学差异（P〉0.05）。D 组患者满意度较M组更高（P〈0.05）。结论：小剂量右美托咪定用于玻璃体切割术可使患者血流动力学平稳,镇静效果良好,疼痛感觉减轻,舒适度提高。