Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in willow leaves under field conditions

Chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves of a willow (Salix sp.) stand grown in the field in northern Sweden was measured on several occasions during the growing season of 1987. For leaves that received mostly full daylight, the F _V/F _P ratio declined roughtly 15% in the afternoon on cloudless days in July (F _P is the fluorescence at the peak of the induction curve obtained at the prevailing air temperature after 45 min of dark adaptation, and F _V is variable fluoresence, F _V=F _P-F _O, where F _O is minimal fluorescence). There was no decrease in the F _V/F _P ratio on cloudy days, while the effect was intermediate on changeable days. In view of this light dependence, together with the fact that the decline in the F _V/F _P ratio was paralleled with an equal decline in the corresponding fluorescence ratio F _V/F _M at 77K, and a similar decline in the maximum quantum yield of O₂ evolution, it is suggested that the decline in the F _V/F _P ratio represents a damage in photosyntem II attributable to photoinhibition. Recovery of the F _V/F _P ratio in dim light following a decline on a cloudless day took 7–16 h to go to completion; the F _V/F _P ratio was fully restored the following morning. When all active leaves of a peripheral shoot were compared, the F _V/F _P ratio in the afternoon of a day of bright light varied greatly from leaf to leaf, though the majority of leaves showed a decline. This variation was matched by a pronounced variation in intercepted photon flux density. When leaves developed in the shade were exposed to full sunlight by trimming of the stand an increased sensitivity to photoinhibition was observed as compared to peripheral leaves. The present study indicates that peripheral willow shoots experienced in the order of 10–20% photoinhibition during an appreciable part of their life. This occurred even though the environmental conditions were within the optimal range of photosynthesis and growth.Abbreviations and symbols F _O minimum fluorescence - F _P fluorescence at the peak of the induction curve obtained at normal ambient temperatures - F _V variable fluorescence - F _M maximum fluorescence obtained at 77K - PPFD photosynthetic photon flux density     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) leaves: Changes in susceptibility to photoinhibition and recovery during the growth season

Kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev.) C.F. Liang et A.R. Ferguson) plants grown in an outdoor enclosure were exposed to the natural conditions of temperature and photon flux density (PFD) over the growing season (October to May). Temperatures ranged from 14 to 21° C while the mean monthly maximum PFD varied from 1000 to 1700 mol · m^–2 · s^–1, although the peak PFDs exceeded 2100 mol · m^–2 · s^–1. At intervals, the daily variation in chlorophyll fluorescence at 692 nm and 77K and the photon yield of O₂ evolution in attached leaves was monitored. Similarly, the susceptibility of intact leaves to a standard photoinhibitory treatment of 20° C and a PFD of 2000 mol · m^–2 · s^–1 and the ability to recover at 25° C and 20 mol · m^–2 · s^–2 was followed through the season. On a few occasions, plants were transferred either to or from a shade enclosure to assess the suceptibility to natural photoinhibition and the capacity for recovery. There were minor though significant changes in early-morning fluorescence emission and photon yield throughout the growing season. The initial fluorescence, F_o, and the maximum fluorescence, F_m, were, however, significantly and persistently different from that in shade-grown kiwifruit leaves, indicative of chronic photoinhibition occurring in the sun leaves. In spring and autumn, kiwifruit leaves were photoinhibited through the day whereas in summer, when the PFDs were highest, no photoinhibition occurred. However, there was apparently no non-radiative energy dissipation occurring then also, indicating that the kiwifruit leaves appeared to fully utilize the available excitation energy. Nevertheless, the propensity for kiwifruit leaves to be susceptible to photoinhibition remained high throughout the season. The cause of a discrepancy between the severe photoinhibition under controlled conditions and the lack of photoinhibition under comparable, natural conditions remains uncertain. Recovery from photoinhibition, by contrast, varied over the season and was maximal in summer and declined markedly in autumn. Transfer of shade-grown plants to full sun had a catastrophic effect on the fluorescence characteristics of the leaf and photon yield. Within 3 d the variable fluorescence, F_v, and the photon yield were reduced by 80 and 40%, respectively, and this effect persisted for at least 20 d. The restoration of fluorescence characteristics on transfer of sun leaves to shade, however, was very slow and not complete within 15 d.Abbreviations and Symbols F_o, F_m, F_v initial, maximum, variable fluorescence - F_i F_v at t = 0 - F F_v at t = - PFD photon flux density - PSII photosystem II - leaf absorptance ratio - (_a photon yield of O₂ evolution (absorbed basis) - _{i a} at t = 0 - _a at t = We thank Miss Linda Muir and Amanda Yeates for their technical assistance in this study.     

Dithiothreitol,an inhibitor of violaxanthin de-epoxidation,increases the susceptibility of leaves ofNerium oleander L. to photoinhibition of photosynthesis

Leaves ofNerium oleander L. plants, which had been previously kept in a shaded glasshouse for at least two months, were fed 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) through their petioles, either for 12h in darkness (overnight) or for 2h in low light (28 μmol photons·m⁻²·s⁻¹), in each case followed by a 3-h exposure to high light (1260 μmol photons·m⁻²·s⁻¹). During exposure to high light, violaxanthin became converted to zeaxanthin in control leaves, to which water had been fed, whereas zeaxanthin did not accumulate in leaves treated with DTT. Total carbon gain was not reduced by DTT during the photoinhibitory treatment. Exposure to high light led to a decrease in the photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, measured as the ratio of variable over maximum fluorescence emission,F _v/F _M, at both 298 K and 77K. The decrease was much more pronounced in the presence of DTT, mainly owing to a sustained increase in the instantaneous fluorescence,F _o. By contrast, in the control leaves,F _o determined immediately after the high-light treatment showed a transient decrease below theF _o value obtained before the onset of the photoinhibitory treatment (i.e. after 12 h dark adaptation), followed by a rapid return (within seconds) to this original level ofF _o during the following recovery period in darkness. Incubation of leaves with DTT led to large, sustained decreases in the photon-use efficiency of photosynthetic O₂ evolution by bright light, whilst the capacity of photosynthetic O₂ evolution at light and CO₂ saturation was less affected. In the control leaves, only small reductions in the photon yield and in the photosynthetic capacity were observed. These findings are consistent with previous suggestions that zeaxanthin, formed in the xanthophyll cycle by de-epoxidation of violaxanthin, is involved in protecting the photosynthetic apparatus against the adverse effects of excessive light.     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) leaves: effect of growth temperature on photoinhibition and recovery

Intact leaves of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev.) C.F. Liang et A.R. Ferguson) from plants grown in a range of controlled temperatures from 15/10 to 30/25°C were exposed to a photon flux density (PFD) of 1500 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹ at leaf temperatures between 10 and 25°C. Photoinhibition and recovery were followed at the same temperatures and at a PFD of 20 μmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹, by measuring chlorophyll fluorescence at 77 K and 692 nm, by measuring the photon yield of photosynthetic O₂ evolution and light-saturated net photosynthetic CO₂ uptake. The growth of plants at low temperatures resulted in chronic photoinhibition as evident from reduced fluorescence and photon yields. However, low-temperature-grown plants apparently had a higher capacity to dissipate excess excitation energy than leaves from plants grown at high temperatures. Induced photoinhibition, from exposure to a PFD above that during growth, was less severe in low-temperature-grown plants, particularly at high exposure temperatures. Net changes in the instantaneous fluorescence,F ₀, indicated that little or no photoinhibition occurred when low-temperature-grown plants were exposed to high-light at high temperatures. In contrast, high-temperature-grown plants were highly susceptible to photoinhibitory damage at all exposure temperatures. These data indicate acclimation in photosynthesis and changes in the capacity to dissipate excess excitation energy occurred in kiwifruit leaves with changes in growth temperature. Both processes contributed to changes in susceptibility to photoinhibition at the different growth temperatures. However, growth temperature also affected the capacity for recovery, with leaves from plants grown at low temperatures having moderate rates of recovery at low temperatures compared with leaves from plants grown at high temperatures which had negligible recovery. This also contributed to the reduced susceptibility to photoinhibition in low-temperature-grown plants. However, extreme photoinhibition resulted in severe reductions in the efficiency and capacity for photosynthesis.     

Phosphorylation of chloroplast membrane proteins partially protects against photoinhibition

Thylakoids isolated from peas (Pisum sativum cv. Kelvedon Wonder) and phosphorylated by incubation with ATP have been compared with non-phosphorylated thylakoids in their sensitivity to photoinhibition by exposure to illumination in vitro. Assays of the kinetics of fluorescence induction at 20° C and the fluorescence emission spectra at-196° C indicate a proportionally larger decrease in fluorescence as a result of photoinhibitory treatment of non-phosphorylated compared with phosphorylated thylakoids. It is concluded that protein phosphorylation can afford partial protection to thylakoids exposed to photoinhibitory conditions.Abbreviations and symbols DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - F ₀ Level of chlorophyll fluorescence when photosystem 2 traps are open - F _m Level of chlorphyll fluorescence when photosystem 2 traps are closed - P Maximum level of fluorescence reached in the absence of DCMU - PSI (II) photosystem I(II)     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) leaves: Effect of light during growth on photoinhibition and recovery

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis was induced in intact kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev.) C. F. Liang et A. R. Ferguson) leaves grown at two photon flux densities (PFDs) of 700 and 1300 mol·m^-2·s^-1 in a controlled environment, by exposing the leaves to PFD between 1000 and 2000 mol·m^-2·s^-1 at temperatures between 10 and 25°C; recovery from photoinhibition was followed at the same range of temperatures and at a PFD between 0 and 500 mol·m^-2·s^-1. In either case the time-courses of photoinhibition and recovery were followed by measuring chlorophyll fluorescence at 692 nm and 77K and by measuring the photon yield of photosynthetic O₂ evolution. The initial rate of photoinhibition was lower in the high-light-grown plants but the long-term extent of photoinhibition was not different from that in low-light-grown plants. The rate constants for recovery after photoinhibition for the plants grown at 700 and 1300 mol·m^-2·s^-1 or for those grown in shade were similar, indicating that differences between sun and shade leaves in their susceptibility to photoinhibition could not be accounted for by differences in capacity for recovery during photoinhibition. Recovery following photoinhibition was increasingly suppressed by an increasing PFD above 20 mol·m^-2·s^-1, indicating that recovery in photoinhibitory conditions would, in any case, be very slow. Differences in photosynthetic capacity and in the capacity for dissipation of non-radiative energy seemed more likely to contribute to differences in susceptibility to photoinhibition between sun and shade leaves of kiwifruit.Abbreviations and symbols F _o , F _m , F _v instantaneous, maximum, variable fluorescence - F _v /F _m fluorescence ratio - F _i =F _v at t=0 - F F _v at t= - K _D rate constant for photochemistry - k(F _p ) first-order rate constant for photoinhibition - k(F _r ) first-order rate constant for recovery - PFD photon flux density - PSII photosystem II - _i photon yield of O₂ evolution (incident light)     

Two components of onset and recovery during photoinhibition of Ulva rotundata

Short-term (up to 5 h) transfers of shade-adapted (100 mol · m^–2 · s^–1) clonal tissue of the marine macroalga Ulva rotundata Blid. (Chlorophyta) to higher irradiances (1700, 850, and 350 mol · m^–2 · s^–1) led to photoinhibition of room-temperature chlorophyll fluorescence and O₂ evolution. The ratio of variable to maximum (F_v/F_m) and variable (F_v) fluorescence, and quantum yield () declined with increasing irradiance and duration of exposure. This decline could be resolved into two components, consistent with the separation of photoinhibition into energy-dissipative processes (photoprotection) and damage to photosystem II (PSII) by excess excitation. The first component, a rapid decrease in F_v/F_m and in F_v, corresponds to an increase in initial (F_o) fluorescence and is highly sensitive to 1 mM chloramphenicol. This component is rapidly reversible under dim (40 mol · m^–2 · s^–1) light, but is less reversible with increasing duration of exposure, and may reflect damage to PSII. The second (after 1 h exposure) component, a slower decline in F_v/F_m and F_v with declining F_o, appears to be associated with the photoprotective interconversion of violaxanthin to zeaxanthin and is sensitive to dithiothreitol. The accumulation of zeaxanthin in U. rotundata is very slow, and may account for the predominance of increases in F_o at high irradiances.Abbreviations and Symbols CAP chloramphenicol - DTT dithiothreitol - F_o, F_m, F_v initial, maximum, and variable fluorescence - quantum yield - PFD photon flux density - PSII photosystem II To whom correspondence should be addressedWe are grateful to O. Björkman and S. Thayer, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, Cal., USA, for analysis of xanthophyll pigments reported here. This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant OCE-8812157 to C.B.O. and J.R. Support for G.L. was provided by a NSF-CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) exchange fellowship.     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact bean leaves: role of light and temperature,and requirement for chloroplast-protein synthesis during recovery

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis was induced in intact leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. grown at a photon flux density (PFD; photon fluence rate) of 300 mol·m^-2·s^-1, by exposure to a PFD of 1400 mol·m^-2·s^-1. Subsequent recovery from photoinhibition was followed at temperatures ranging from 5 to 35°C and at a PFD of either 20 or 140 mol·m^-2·s^-1 or in complete darkness. Photoinhibition and recovery were monitored mainly by chlorophyll fluorescence emission at 77K but also by photosynthetic O₂ evolution. The effects of the protein-synthesis inhibitors, cycloheximide and chloramphenicol, on photoinhibition and recovery were also determined. The results demonstrate that recovery was temperature-dependent with rates slow below 15°C and optimal at 30°C. Light was required for maximum recovery but the process was light-saturated at a PFD of 20 mol·m^-2·s^-1. Chloramphenicol, but not cycloheximide, inactivated the repair process, indicating that recovery involved the synthesis of one or more chloroplast-encoded proteins. With chloramphenicol, it was shown that photoinhibition and recovery occurred concomitantly. The temperature-dependency of the photoinhibition process was, therefore, in part determined by the effect of temperature on the recovery process. Consequently, photoinhibition is the net difference between the rate of damage and the rate of repair. The susceptibility of chilling-sensitive plant species to photoinhibition at low temperatures is proposed to result from the low rates of recovery in this temperature range.Abbreviations and symbols Da Dalton - Fo, Fm, Fv instantaneous, maximum, variable fluorescence emission - PFD photon flux density - PSII photosystem II - photon yield C.I.W.-D.P.B. Publication No. 871     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis: effect on chlorophyll fluorescence at 77K in intact leaves and in chloroplast membranes of Nerium oleander

The effect of exposing intact leaves and isolated chloroplast membranes of Nerium oleander L. to excessive light levels under otherwise favorable conditions was followed by measuring photosynthetic CO₂ uptake, electron transport and low-temperature (77K=-196°C) fluorescence kinetics. Photoinhibition, as manifested by a reduced rate and photon (quantum) yield of photosynthesis and a reduced electron transport rate, was accompanied by marked changes in fluorescence characteristics of the exposed upper leaf surface while there was little effect on the shaded lower surface. The most prominent effect of photoinhibitory treatment of leaves and chloroplasts was a strong quenching of the variable fluorescence emission at 692 nm (F_v,692) while the instantaneous fluorescence (F_o,692) was slightly increased. The maximum and the variable fluorescence at 734 nm were also reduced but not as much as F_M,692 and F_v,692. The results support the view that photoinhibition involves an inactivation of the primary photochemistry of photosystem II by damaging the reaction-center complex. In intact leaves photoinhibition increased with increased light level, increased exposure time, and with decreased temperature. Increased CO₂ pressure or decreased O₂ pressure provided no protection against photoinhibition. With isolated chloroplasts, inhibition of photosystem II occurred even under essentially anaerobic conditions. Measurements of fluorescence characteristics at 77K provides a simple, rapid, sensitive and reproducible method for assessing photoinhibitory injury to leaves. The method should prove especially useful in studies of the occurrence of photoinhibition in nature and of interactive effects between high light levels and major environmental stress factors.Abbreviations and symbols PFD photon flux area density - PSI, PSII photosystem I, II - F_M, F_O, F_V maximum, instantaneous, variable fluorescence emission C.I.W.-D.P.B. Publication No. 773     

The involvement of the photoinhibition of photosystem II and impaired membrane energization in the reduced quantum yield of carbon assimilation in chilled maize

In this study we investigated the basis for the reduction in the quantum yield of carbon assimilation in maize (Zea mays L. cv. LG11) caused by chilling in high light. After chilling attached maize leaves at 5° C for 6 h at high irradiance (1000 mol photons·m^–2·s^–1) chlorophyll fluorescence measurements indicated a serious effect on the efficiency of photochemical conversion by photosystem II (PSII) and measurements of [¹⁴C]atrazine binding showed that the plastoquinone binding site was altered in more than half of the PSII reaction centres. Although there were no direct effects of the chilling treatment on coupling-factor activity, ATP-formation capacity was affected because the photoinhibition of PSII led to a reduced capacity to energize the thylakoid membranes. In contrast to chilling at high irradiance, no photoinhibition of PSII accompanied the 20% decrease in the quantum yield of carbon assimilation when attached maize leaves were chilled in low light (50 mol photons·m^–2·s^–1). Thus it is clear that photoinhibition of PSII is not the sole cause of the light-dependent, chillinduced decrease in the quantum yield of carbon assimilation. During the recovery of photosynthesis from the chilling treatment it was observed that full [¹⁴C]atrazinebinding capacity and membrane-energization capacity recovered significantly more slowly than the quantum yield of carbon assimilation. Thus, not only is photoinhibition of PSII not the sole cause for the decreased quantum yield of carbon assimilation, apparently an appreciable population of photoinhibited PSII centres can be tolerated without any reduction in the quantum yield of carbon assimilation.Abbreviations and Symbols PPFD photosynthetically active photon flux density - PSII photosystem II - F_v/F_m ratio of variable to maximal fluorescence - quantum yield of carbon assimilation This work was supported in part by grants from the UK Agricultural and Food Research Council (AG 84/5) to N.R.B. and from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Competitive Research Grant 87-CRCR-1-2381) to D.R.O. G.Y.N. was the recipient of a British Council scholarship and N.R.B. received a fellowship from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (Project on Food Production and Preservation).     

Mechanism of photosystem-I photoinhibition in leaves ofCucumis sativus L.

It was recently shown that the site of photoinhibition in leaves of Cucumis sativus L. at low temperatures is Photosystem I (PSI), not PSII (I. Terashima et al. 1994, Planta 193, 300–306). In the present study, the mechanisms of this PSI photoinhibition in vivo were examined. By lowering the photon flux density during the photoinhibitory treatment of leaves at 4°C for 5 h to less than 100 mol·m^–2s^–1, we were able to separate the steps of the destruction of the electron-transfer components. Although P-700, the reaction-center chlorophyll, was almost intact in this low-light treatment, the quantum yield of the electron transfer through PSI and photochemically induced absorption change at 701 nm were markedly inhibited. This, along with the results from the measurements of the light-induced absorption changes in the presence of various concentrations of methyl viologen, an artificial electron acceptor, indicates that the component on the acceptor side of the PSI, A₁ or F_x, is the first site of inactivation. When the photon flux density during the treatment was increased to 220 mol·m^–2s^–1, the destruction of P-700 itself was also observed. Furthermore, the partial degradation of the chlorophyll-binding large subunits was observed in photoinhibited leaves. This degradation of the subunits was not detected when the treatment was carried out under nitrogen atmosphere, the condition in which the electron transfer is not inhibited. Thus, the photoinhibitory processes in the reaction center of PSI go through three steps, the inactivation of the acceptor side, the destruction of the reaction-center chlorophyll and the degradation of the reaction center subunit(s). The similarities and the differences between the mechanisms of PSI photoinhibition and those of PSII photoinhibition are discussed.Abbreviations DAD 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine - LHCI, LHCII light-harvesting chlorophyll-a/b proteins associating with photosystems I and II, respectively - PFD photon flux density We are grateful to Dr. I. Enami (Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Science University of Tokyo) and Drs. H. Matsubara and H. Oh-oka (Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Osaka University) for generous gifts of antisera used in the present work. We also thank A. Aoyama for technical assistance. This work was partly supported by the grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan.     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) leaves: Effect of temperature

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis was induced in attached leaves of kiwifruit grown in natural light not exceeding a photon flux density (PFD) of 300 mol·m^-2·s^-1, by exposing them to a PFD of 1500 mol·m^-2·s^-1. The temperature was held constant, between 5 and 35° C, during the exposure to high light. The kinetics of photoinhibition were measured by chlorophyll fluorescence at 77K and the photon yield of photosynthetic O₂ evolution. Photoinhibition occurred at all temperatures but was greatest at low temperatures. Photoinhibition followed pseudo first-order kinetics, as determined by the variable fluorescence (F _v) and photon yield, with the long-term steady-state of photoinhibition strongly dependent on temperature wheareas the observed rate constant was only weakly temperature-dependent. Temperature had little effect on the decrease in the maximum fluorescence (F _m) but the increase in the instantaneous fluorescence (F _o) was significantly affected by low temperatures in particular. These changes in fluorescence indicate that kiwifruit leaves have some capacity to dissipate excessive excitation energy by increasing the rate constant for non-radiative (thermal) energy dissipation although temperature apparently had little effect on this. Direct photoinhibitory damage to the photosystem II reaction centres was evident by the increases in F _o and extreme, irreversible damage occurred at the lower temperatures. This indicates that kiwifruit leaves were most susceptible to photoinhibition at low temperatures because direct damage to the reaction centres was greatest at these temperatures. The results also imply that mechanisms to dissipate excess energy were inadequate to afford any protection from photoinhibition over a wide temperature range in these shade-grown leaves.Abbreviations and symbols fluorescence yield correction coefficient - F _o, F _m, F _v instantaneous, maximum, variable fluorescence - K _D, K _F, K _P, K _T rate constants for non-radiative energy dissipation, fluorescence, photochemistry, energy transfer to photosystem I - PFD photon flux density - PSI, II photosystem I, II - _i photon yield of photosynthesis (incident light)     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis under natural conditions in ivy (Hedera helix L.) growing in an understory of deciduous trees

We investigated to what extent south-exposed leaves (E-leaves) of the evergreen ivy (Hedera helix L.) growing in the shadow of two deciduous trees suffered from photoinhibition of photosynthesis when leaf-shedding started in autumn. Since air temperatures drop concomitantly with increase in light levels, changes in photosynthetic parameters (apparent quantum yield, _i and maximal photosynthetic capacity of O₂ evolution, P_max; chlorophyll-a fluorescence at room temperature) as well as pigment composition were compared with those in north-exposed leaves of the same clone (N-leaves; photosynthetic photon flux density PPFD< 100 mol · m^–2 · s^–2) and phenotypic sun leaves (S-leaves; PPFD up to 2000 mol · m^–2 · s^–1).In leaves exposed to drastic light changes during winter (E-leaves) strong photoinhibition of photosynthesis could be observed as soon as the incident PPFD increased in autumn. In contrast, in N-leaves the ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence (F_V/F_Mm) and _i did not decline appreciably prior to severe frosts (up to -12° C) in January. At this time, _i was reduced to a similar extent in all leaves, from about 0.073 mol O₂ · mol^–1 photons before stress to about 0.020. Changes in _i were linearly correlated with changes in f_v/f_m (r = 0.955). The strong reduction in F_V/F_M on exposure to stress was caused by quenching in F_M. The initial fluorescence (F₀), however, was also quenched in all leaves. The diminished fluorescence yield was accompanied by an increase in zeaxanthin content. These effects indicate that winter stress in ivy primarily induces an increase in non-radiative energy-dissipation followed by photoinhibitory damage of PSII. Although a pronounced photooxidative bleaching of chloroplast pigments occurred in January (especially in E-leaves), photosynthetic parameters recovered completely in spring. Thus, the reduction in potential photosynthetic yield in winter may be up to three times greater in leaves subjected to increasing light levels than in leaves not exposed to a changing light environment.Abbreviations and Symbols F₀, F_M initial and maximal fluorescence yield when all PSII centres are open and closed - F_V variable fluorescence (F_M-F₀) - P_max maximal photosynthetic capacity at 1000 umol · m^–2 · s^–1 PPFD and CO₂ saturation - PPFD photosynthetic photon flux density - _i apparent quantum yield of photosynthetic O₂ evolution - E-leaves, N-leaves shade leaves exposed, not exposed to drastic light changes during winter - S-leaves sun leaves from an open ivy stand Dedicated to Professor Otto Härtel on the occasion of his 80th birthdayThis work was supported by the Austrian Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung.     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) leaves: Recovery and its dependence on temperature

Recovery of photoinhibition in intact leaves of shade-grown kiwifruit was followed at temperatures between 10° and 35° C. Photoinhibition was initially induced by exposing the leaves for 240 min to a photon flux density (PFD) of 1 500 mol·m^-2·s^-1 at 20° C. In additional experiments to determine the effect of extent of photoinhibition on recovery, this period of exposure was varied between 90 and 400 min. The kinetics of recovery were followed by chlorophyll fluorescence at 77K. Recovery was rapid at temperatures of 25–35° and slow or negligible below 20° C. The results reinforce those from earlier studies that indicate chilling-sensitive species are particularly susceptible to photoinhibition at low temperatures because of the low rates of recovery. At all temperatures above 15° C, recovery followed pseudo first-order kinetics. The extent of photoinhibition affected the rate constant for recovery which declined in a linear fashion at all temperatures with increased photoinhibition. However, the extent of photoinhibition had little effect on the temperature-dependency of recovery. An analysis of the fluorescence characteristics indicated that a reduction in non-radiative energy dissipation and repair of damaged reaction centres contributed about equally to the apparent recovery though biochemical studies are needed to confirm this. From an interpretation of the kinetics of photoinhibition, we suggest that recovery occurring during photoinhibition is limited by factors different from those that affect post-photoinhibition recovery.Abbreviations and symbols F _o, F _m, F _v instantaneous, maximum, variable fluorescence - K _D, K _F, K _P, K _T rate constants for non-radiative energy dissipation, fluorescence, photochemistry, transfer to photosystem I - K(PI), k(R) rate constants for photoinhibition and recovery - PFD photon flux density - PSI, II photosystem I, II - _i photon yield of photosynthesis (incident light)     

Effect of daily photon receipt on the susceptibility of dwarf bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) leaves to photoinhibition of photosynthesis

Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants were grown at two light periods of 8 and 13 h with a similar photon flux density (PFD) giving a daily photon receipt (DPR) of 17.9 and 38.2 mol · m–2, respectively. Shoot growth and leaf area development were followed at regular intervals and diurnal whole-plant photosynthesis measured. Single mature trifoliate leaves were exposed to photoinhibitory treatments at PFDs of 800 and 1400 mol · m–2 · s–1 and at temperatures of 12 and 20°C. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photon yields were measured at regular intervals throughout each treatment. Plants grown in 13 h had significantly greater leaf areas than those grown in 8 h. There were no differences in maximum rates of photosynthesis, photon yields and only minor but significant differences in F_v/F_m for plants in the two treatments, showing photosynthetic characteristics were dependent on PFD but not DPR. A significant decline in photosynthesis and F_v/F_m occurred over the 13-h but little change in photosynthesis for plants in the 8 h, indicating some feedback inhibition of photosynthesis was occurring. Plants grown in 8 h were consistently more susceptible to photoinhibition of photosynthesis at all treatments than 13-h plants. Nevertheless, photoinhibition was exacerbated by increases in PFD, and by decreases in temperature for leaves from both treatments. However, for plants from the 8-h day, exposing leaves to 12°C and 1400 mol · m–2 · s–1 caused photo-oxidation and severe bleaching but no visible damage on leaves from 13-h-grown plants. Closure of the photosystem II reaction-centre pool was partially correlated with increasing extents of photoinhibition but the relationship was similar for plants from both treatments. There remains no clear explanation for their wide differences in susceptibility to photoinhibition.Abbreviations and Symbols DPR daily photon receipt - F₀ and F_m initial and maximal fluorescence - F_v/F_m fluorescence ratio in dark-treated leaves - F/F_m intrinsic efficiency of PSII during illumination - PFD photon flux density - _i photon yield (incident basis) - _psi quantum yield of PSII electron transport - P_max maximum rate of photosynthesis - q_N non-photochemical quenching coefficient - q_P photochemical quenching coefficient Many thanks to my colleague William Laing who spent a considerable effort in developing the programme to run the photosynthesis apparatus. I am also indebted to one reviewer with whom I corresponded to resolve some issues in the paper. This project was funded by the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology.     

Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in intact willow leaves in response to moderate changes in light and temperature

When willow leaves were transferred from 270 to 650 μmol m^-2 s^-1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), partial photoinhibition developed over the next hours. This was manifested as roughly parallel inhibitions of the ratio of variable over maximal chlorophyll fluorescence (F_v/F_M), and of the maximal quantum yield and the capacity of photosynthesis. This occurred even though photosynthesis was operating well below its capacity and only about one fourth of the reaction centres of photosystem (PS) II were in the closed state. When the air temperature was lowered from 25 to 15°C (18°C leaf temperature) photoinhibition was markedly accelerated. This temperature effect is suggested to be mediated largely by a decrease in the rate of energy dissipation through photosynthesis and indicated by a 50% increase in the number of closed PSII reaction centres. The pool size of the carotcnoid zeaxanthin and the extent of inhibition of the F_v/F_M ratio were positively correlated during the treatment. However, the relaxation following imposition of darkness was much faster for zeaxanthin than for the F_v/F_M ratio, ruling out the possibility of a direct causal relationship. The energy distribution between PSII and PSI was unaltered upon photoinhibition. However, the functioning of the PSII reaction centres was altered, as indicated by a rise in the minimal fluorescence, Fa.     

Fluorescence quenching during photosynthesis and photoinhibition of Ulva rotundata blid.

The relationships between photoinhibition and photoprotection in high and low-light-grown Ulva were examined by a combination of chlorophyll-fluorescence-monitoring techniques. Tissues were exposed to a computer-controlled sequence of 5-min exposures to red light, followed by 5-min darkness, with stepwise increases in photon flux. Coefficients of chlorophyll fluorescence quenching (1?q_P and NPQ) were calculated following a saturating pulse of white light near the end of each 5-min light treatment. Dark-adapted chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (F₀ and F_V/F_M) were calculated from a saturating pulse at the end of each 5-min dark period. Low-light-grown Ulva showed consistently higher 1?q_P, i.e. higher reduction status of Q (high primary acceptor of photosystem II), and lower capacity for nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) at saturating light than did high-light-grown plants. Consequently, low-light plants rapidly displayed photoinhibitory damage (increased F₀) at light saturation in seawater. Removal of dissolved inorganic carbon from seawater also led to photoinhibitory damage of high-light-grown Ulva at light saturation, and addition of saturating amounts of dissolved inorganic carbon protected low-light-grown plants against photoinhibitory damage. A large part of NPQ was abolished by treatment with 3 mM dithiothreitol and the processes so inhibited were evidently photoprotective, because dithiothreitol treatment accelerated photoinhibitory damage in both low- and high-light-grown Ulva. The extent of photoinhibitory damage in Ulva was exacerbated by treatment with chloramphenicol (1 mM) without much effect on chlorophyll-quenching parameters, evidently because this inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis reduced the rate of repair processes.     

Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield of O2 evolution in leaves of higher plants

High-light treatments (1750–2000 mol photons m^–2 · s^–1) of leaves from a number of higher-plant species invariably resulted in quenching of the maximum 77K chlorophyll fluorescence at both 692 and 734 nm (F _M, 692 and F _M, 734). The response of instantaneous fluorescence at 692 nm (F _O, 692) was complex. In leaves of some species F _O, 692 increased dramatically in others it was quenched, and in others yet it showed no marked, consistent change. Regardless of the response of F _O, 692 an apparently linear relationship was obtained between the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (F _V/F _M, 692) and the photon yield of O₂ evolution, indicating that photoinhibition affects these two variables to approximately the same extent. Treatment of leaves in a CO₂–free gas stream containing 2% O₂ and 98% N₂ under weak light (100 mol · m^–2 · s^–1) resulted in a general and fully reversible quenching of 77K fluorescence at 692 and 734 nm. In this case both F _O, 692 and F _M, 692 were invariably quenched, indicating that the quenching was caused by an increased non-radiative energy dissipation in the pigment bed. We propose that high-light treatments can have at least two different, concurrent effects on 77K fluorescence in leaves. One results from damage to the photosystem II (PSII) reaction-center complex and leads to a rise in F _O, 692; the other results from an increased non-radiative energy dissipation and leads to quenching of both F _O, 692 and F _M, 692 This general quenching had a much longer relaxation time than reported for pH-dependent quenching in algae and chloroplasts. Sun leaves, whose F _V/F _M, 692 ratios were little affected by high-light exposure in normal air, suffered pronounced photoinhibition when the exposure was made under conditions that prevent photosynthetic gas exchange (2% O₂, 0% CO₂). However, they were still less susceptible than shade leaves, indicating that the higher capacity for energy dissipation via photosynthesis is not the only cause of their lower susceptibility. The rate constant for recovery from photoinhibition was much higher in mature sun leaves than in mature shade leaves, indicating that differences in the capacity for continuous repair may in part account for the difference in their susceptibility to photoinhibition.Abbreviations and symbols kDa kilodalton - LHC-II light-harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex - PFD photon flux density (photon fluence rate) - PSI, PSII photosystem I, II - F _O, F _M, F _V instantaneous, maximum, variable fluorescence emission - absorptance - _a photon yield of O₂ evolution (absorbed light) C.I.W.-D.P.B. Publication No. 925     

The ratio of variable to maximum chlorophyll fluorescence from photosystem II,measured in leaves at ambient temperature and at 77K,as an indicator of the photon yield of photosynthesis

The response of a number of species to high light levels was examined to determine whether chlorophyll fluorescence from photosystem (PS) II measured at ambient temperature could be used quantitatively to estimate the photon yield of O₂ evolution. In many species, the ratio of the yield of the variable (F_V) and the maximum chlorophyll fluorescence (F_M) determined from leaves at ambient temperature matched that from leaves frozen to 77K when reductions in F_V/F_M and the photon yield resulted from exposure of leaves to high light levels under favorable temperatures and water status. Under conditions which were less favorable for photosynthesis, F_V/F_M at ambient temperature often matched the photon yield more closely than F_V/F_M measured at 77K. Exposure of leaves to high light levels in combination with water stress or chilling stress resulted in much greater reductions in the photon yield than in F_V/F_M (at both ambient temperature and 77K) measured in darkness, which would be expected if the site of inhibition was beyond PSII. Following chilling stress, F_V/F_M determined during measurement of the photon yield in the light was depressed to a degree more similar to that of the depression of photon yield, presumably as a result of regulation of PSII in response to greatly reduced electron flow.Abbreviations and Symbols F_o yield of instantaneous fluorescence - F_M yield of maximum fluorescence - F_V yield of variable fluorescence - PFD photon flux density (400–700 nm) - PSI (II) photosystem I (II) This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinchaft. W.W.A. gratefully acknowledges the support of Fellowships from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung. We also thank Maria Lesch for plant maintenance.     

Two mechanisms of recovery from photoinhibition in vivo: Reactivation of photosystem II related and unrelated to D1-protein turnover

Recovery (at 20° C) of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) leaf sections from photoinhibition of photosynthesis was monitored by means of the fluorescence parameter F_V/F_M of intact leaf tissue and of PSII-driven electron-transport activity of isolated thylakoids. Different degrees of photoinactivation of PSII were obtained by preillumination in ambient air (at 4 or 20° C), CO₂-free air or at low and high O₂ levels (2 or 41 %) in N₂. The kinetics of recovery exhibited two distinct phases. The first phase usually was completed within about 20-60 min and was most pronounced after preillumination in low O₂. The slow phase proceeded for several hours leading to almost complete reactivation of PSII. Preincubation of the leaves with streptomycin (SM), which inhibits chloroplast-encoded protein synthesis, inhibited the slow recovery phase only, indicating the dependence of this phase on resynthesis of the reaction-centre protein, D1. The fast recovery phase remained largely unaffected by SM. Both phases were strongly but not totally dependent on irradiation of the leaf with low light. When SM was absent, net degradation of the D1 protein could neither be detected upon photoinhibitory irradiation nor during following incubation of the leaf sections in low light or darkness. In the presence of SM, net D1 degradation was seen and tended to increase with O₂ concentration during photoinhibition treatment. Based on these data, we suggest that photoinactivation of PSII in vivo occurs in at least two steps. From the first step, reactivation appears possible in low light without D1 turnover (fast recovery phase). Action of oxygen then may lead to a second step, in which the D1 protein is affected and reactivation requires its removal and replacement (slow phase).Abbreviations Chl chlorophyll - F₀, F_M and F_V initial, maximum total and maximum variable chlorophyll fluorescence yield, respectively - PFD photon flux density - SM streptomycin We thank Professor P. Böger (Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Konstanz, Germany) for a gift of D1-specific antibodies. The paper contains part of the thesis work of J.L. The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungs-gemeinschaft (SFB 189).