The CW domain, a new histone recognition module in chromatin proteins

Post-translational modifications of the N-terminal histone tails, including lysine methylation, have key roles in regulation of chromatin and gene expression. A number of protein modules have been identified that recognize differentially modified histone tails and provide their proteins with the capacity to sense such modifications. Here, we identify the CW domain of plant and animal chromatin-related proteins as a novel module that recognizes different methylated states of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4me). The solution structure of the CW domain of the Arabidopsis ASH1 HOMOLOG2 (ASHH2) histone methyltransferase provides insight into how different CW domains can distinguish different methylated histone tails. We provide evidence that ASHH2 is acting on H3K4me-marked genes, allowing for ASHH2-dependent H3K36 tri-methylation, which contributes to sustained expression of tissue-specific and developmentally regulated genes. This suggests that ASHH2 is a combined 'reader' and 'writer' of the histone code. We propose that different CW domains, dependent on their specificity for different H3K4 methylations, are important for epigenetic memory or participate in switching between permissive and repressive chromatin states.     

Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) proteins

Cytosine methylation at symmetrical CpG and CpNpG sequences plays a key role in the epigenetic control of plant growth and development; yet, the way by which the methylation signal is interpreted into a functional state has not been elucidated. In animals, the methylation signal is recognized by methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) proteins that specifically bind methylated CpG dinucleotides. In Arabidopsis thaliana, 12 putative MBD proteins were identified and classified into seven subclasses. Here, we characterized six MBD proteins representing four subclasses (II, III, IV, and VI) of the Arabidopsis MBD family. We found that AtMBD7 (subclass VI), a unique protein containing a double MBD motif, as well as AtMBD5 and AtMBD6 (subclass IV), bind specifically symmetrically methylated CpG sites. The MBD motif derived from AtMBD6, but not from AtMBD2, was sufficient for binding methylated CpG dinucleotides. AtMBD6 precipitated histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity from the leaf nuclear extract. The examined AtMBD proteins neither bound methylated CpNpG sequences nor did they display DNA demethylase activity. Our results suggest that AtMBD5, AtMBD6, and AtMBD7 are likely to function in Arabidopsis plants as mediators of the CpG methylation, linking DNA methylation-induced gene silencing with histone deacetylation.     

Molecular characterization of the tobacco SET domain protein NtSET1 unravels its role in histone methylation, chromatin binding, and segregation

Plants contain a great number of genes encoding a distinctive class of SET domain proteins which harbor a plant-specific N-terminal part together with a C-terminal part showing highest sequence similarity to the catalytic domain of the yeast CLR4, the human SUV39H1 and G9a histone-methyltransferases (HMTases). Here we show that NtSET1, a representative member of this class from tobacco, methylated both K9 and K27 of histone H3 in vitro. Ectopic expression of NtSET1, by an inducible promoter, increased the amount of dimethylated H3K9 and induced chromosome-segregation defects in tobacco BY2 cells. Deletion analyses show that the HMTase activity, the association with specific chromatin regions and with condensed chromosomes, and the cellular effects largely depended on the C-terminal region including the SET domain of the protein. Nevertheless, the N-terminal part of NtSET1 was capable of targeting the green fluorescent protein to interphase chromatin. Finally, we show that NtSET1 bound LHP1, the Arabidopsis homolog of animal heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), and that LHP1 co-localized with heterochromatin containing high amounts of dimethylated H3K9, suggesting a role for NtSET1 in heterochromatic function. Taken together, our results provide new insights into the molecular and global chromatin-binding activities of this particular class member of plant SET domain proteins.     

Isw1a does not have strict limitations on the length of extranucleosomal DNAs for mobilization of nucleosomes assembled with HeLa cell histones

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Isw1a and Isw2 ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes have important roles in vivo in the regulation of nucleosome positioning and modulation of gene activity. We studied the ability of the Isw1a- and Isw2-remodeling enzymes to reposition nucleosomes in mono- and dinucleosomes templates with variably positioned histone octamers (in the center or at the ends of the DNA fragment). To compare the Isw1a and Isw2 nucleosome-mobilizing activities, we utilized mono- and dinucleosome templates reconstituted with purified HeLa cell histones and DNA containing one or two copies of the “601” nucleosome high-affinity sequence used to specifically position nucleosomes on the DNA. The obtained data suggest that Isw1a is able to mobilize HeLa cell histone-assembled mononucleosomes with long (more than 30?bp) extranucleosomal DNAs protruding from both sides, which contrasts to the previously reported inability of Isw1 to mobilize similar nucleosomes assembled with recombinant yeast histones. The results also suggest that Isw1a and Isw2 can mobilize nucleosomes with unfavorably short linker DNA lengths, and the presence of internucleosomal interactions promotes mobilization of nucleosomes even when the linkers are short.     

Regulation of chromatin structure during thymic T cell development

Development is the process whereby a multipotent cell gives rise, through series of divisions, to progeny with successively restricted potentials. During T cell development, the process begins with a multipotent hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) in the bone marrow, moves to the thymus where early T cells or thymocytes pass through signal‐initiated developmental checkpoints, and ends in the periphery where mature T cells reside. At each step along this developmental pathway, T lymphocyte progenitors must be able to turn genes on and off, creating a specialized program of gene expression, to allow further development. How is gene expression coordinated? This review will summarize what has been learned about the function of chromatin structure in generating a “blueprint” of gene expression during T cell development. This will include discussion of mechanisms of chromatin remodeling, histone modification, and heritable gene silencing. In many cases, these processes are carried out by multi‐protein complexes whose components are largely ubiquitously expressed. The spatial and temporal specificity of these complexes is contributed by sequence specific DNA binding factors, some of which are cell type restricted in their expression. This review will summarize research underway to identify these key genetic “targeters.” Taken together, the research reviewed here provides a glimpse into the importance of regulation of chromatin structure in T cell development and the “players” involved. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Chromatin remodeling and bivalent histone modifications in embryonic stem cells

Pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are characterized by distinct epigenetic features including a relative enrichment of histone modifications related to active chromatin. Among these is tri‐methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3 (H3K4me3). Several thousands of the H3K4me3‐enriched promoters in pluripotent cells also contain a repressive histone mark, namely H3K27me3, a situation referred to as “bivalency”. While bivalent promoters are not unique to pluripotent cells, they are relatively enriched in these cell types, largely marking developmental and lineage‐specific genes which are silent but poised for immediate action. The H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications are catalyzed by lysine methyltransferases which are usually found within, although not entirely limited to, the Trithorax group (TrxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) protein complexes, respectively, but these do not provide selective bivalent specificity. Recent studies highlight the family of ATP‐dependent chromatin remodeling proteins as regulators of bivalent domains. Here, we discuss bivalency in general, describe the machineries that catalyze bivalent chromatin domains, and portray the emerging connection between bivalency and the action of different families of chromatin remodelers, namely INO80, esBAF, and NuRD, in pluripotent cells. We posit that chromatin remodeling proteins may enable “bivalent specificity”, often selectively acting on, or selectively depleted from, bivalent domains.     

Chromatin domain boundaries： insulators and beyond

The eukaryotic genome is organized into functionally and structurally distinct domains, representing regulatory units for gene expression and chromosome behavior. DNA sequences that mark the border between adjacent domains are the insulators or boundary elements, which are required in maintenance of the function of different domains. Some insulators need others enable to play insulation activity. Chromatin domains are defined by distinct sets of post-translationally modified histones. Recent studies show that these histone modifications are also involved in establishment of sharp chromatin boundaries in order to prevent the spreading of distinct domains. Additionally, in some loci, the high-order chromatin structures for long-range looping interactions also have boundary activities, suggesting a correlation between insulators and chromatin loop domains. In this review, we will discuss recent progress in the field of chromatin domain boundaries.     

Epigenetic regulation in human melanoma: past and future

The development and progression of melanoma have been attributed to independent or combined genetic and epigenetic events. There has been remarkable progress in understanding melanoma pathogenesis in terms of genetic alterations. However, recent studies have revealed a complex involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in the regulation of gene expression, including methylation, chromatin modification and remodeling, and the diverse activities of non-coding RNAs. The roles of gene methylation and miRNAs have been relatively well studied in melanoma, but other studies have shown that changes in chromatin status and in the differential expression of long non-coding RNAs can lead to altered regulation of key genes. Taken together, they affect the functioning of signaling pathways that influence each other, intersect, and form networks in which local perturbations disturb the activity of the whole system. Here, we focus on how epigenetic events intertwine with these pathways and contribute to the molecular pathogenesis of melanoma.     

植物开花的组蛋白甲基化调控分子机理

开花是指植物从营养生长转变到生殖生长的生理过程,是植物个体发育和后代繁衍的中心环节,既受遗传基础决定,同时又受到温度和光周期等多种环境因素的调控。在拟南芥中,已经分离了大量的与开花相关的基因,从遗传学上已初步形成了一个开花调控的网络。组蛋白甲基化是植物发育过程的重要调节方式,近年来关于其参与开花调控的研究有了重要进展。本文综述了具有代表性的组蛋白H3赖氨酸甲基化修饰参与调控植物开花发育的机制,提出该研究领域的发展方向和前景。     

Chromatin proteomics and epigenetic regulatory circuits

Many phenotypic changes of eukaryotic cells due to changes in gene expression depend on alterations in chromatin structure. Processes involved in the alteration of chromatin are diverse and include post-translational modifications of histone proteins, incorporation of specific histone variants, methylation of DNA and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Interconnected with these processes are the localization of chromatin domains within the nuclear architecture and the appearance of various classes of noncoding regulatory RNAs. Recent experiments underscore the role of these processes in influencing diverse biological functions. However, the evidence to date implies the importance of an interplay of all these chromatin-changing functions, generating an epigenetic regulatory circuit that is still not well understood.