Two highly related homeodomain proteins, Nkx5-1 and Nkx5-2, display different DNA binding specificities.

The mouse Nkx5-1 and Nkx5-2 genes are related to NK genes in Drosophila and encode proteins with very similar homeodomains. In higher vertebrates Nkx5 genes are specifically expressed in the inner ear. Inactivation of the mouse Nkx5-1 gene by homologous recombination revealed a critical role for the formation of vestibular inner ear structures. Here, we investigated biochemical properties of the proteins encoded by the Nkx5 genes. A similar consensus binding sequence was isolated for both Nkx5 proteins using binding site selection. This sequence is related to target sequences previously identified for other Nkx proteins and contains the conserved homeodomain binding core TAAT. An additional, novel and unrelated high affinity binding sequence could be identified for the Nkx5-2 protein.     

Alpha 2 beta 1 integrins from different cell types show different binding specificities

Purified alpha 2 beta 1 integrin from human platelets was compared in its function and immunoreactivity to alpha 2 beta 1 from endothelial cells. Both alpha 2 beta 1 integrins bound to type I collagen-Sepharose and had indistinguishable immunoreactivities when analyzed by a panel of monoclonal and polyclonal alpha 2-specific antibodies. However, functional analysis using rechromatography of purified receptors on laminin and collagen-Sepharose showed that endothelial alpha 2 beta 1 was able to bind to laminin, whereas its counterpart from platelets did not. Moreover, a receptor binding assay indicated that, in contrast to platelets, endothelial cells might also use alpha 2 beta 1 to bind to fibronectin. These results suggest that the alpha 2 beta 1 binding specificity may be modulated by cell-type specific factors.     

Phosphopeptide binding specificities of BRCA1 COOH-terminal (BRCT) domains

Protein phosphorylation by protein kinases may generate docking sites for other proteins. It thus allows the assembly of signaling complexes in response to kinase activation. Several protein domains that bind phosphoserine or phosphothreonine residues have been identified, including the 14-3-3, PIN1, FHA, KIX, WD-40 domain, and polo box (Yaffe, M. B., and Elia, A. E. (2001) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 131-138; Elia, A. E., Cantley, L. C., and Yaffe, M. B. (2003) Science 299, 1228-1231). The BRCA1 COOH-terminal (BRCT) domains are protein modules found in many proteins that regulate DNA damage responses (Koonin, E. V., Altschul, S. F., and Bork, P. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 266-268). Whether BRCT domains can mediate phosphorylation-dependent interactions has not been systematically investigated. We report here that the BRCT domains also recognize phosphopeptides. Oriented peptide library analysis indicated that the BRCT domains from BRCA1, MDC1, BARD1, and DNA Ligase IV preferred distinct phosphoserine-containing peptides. In addition, the interaction between BRCA1 and the BRCT binding motif of BACH1 was required for BACH1 checkpoint activity. Furthermore, BRCT domains of the yeast DNA repair protein Rad9 could bind phosphopeptides, suggesting that the BRCT domains represent a class of ancient phosphopeptide-binding modules. Potential targets of BRCT domains were identified through data base search. Structural analysis of BRCA1 BRCT repeats also predicted conserved residues that may form the phosphopeptide-binding pocket. Thus, the BRCT repeats are a new family of phosphopeptide-binding domains in DNA damage responses.     

DNA and histone H1 interact with different domains of HMG 1 and 2 proteins.

High mobility group (HMG) proteins 1 and 2 from calf thymus have been digested under structuring conditions (0.35 M NaCl, pH 7.1) with two proteases of different specificities, trypsin and V8. The two proteases give a different but restricted pattern of peptides in a time course digestion study. However, when the interactions of the peptides with DNA are studied by blotting, a closely related peptide from HMG-1 and -2 does not show any apparent binding. This peptide, from the V8 protease digestion, has been isolated by DNA-cellulose chromatography and has the amino acid composition predicted for a fragment containing the two C-terminal domains of the protein, i.e., approximately residues 74-243 for HMG-1. The same peptide shows the only interaction detectable with labelled histone H1. A separate function for the different domains of HMG proteins 1 and 2 is proposed.     

Stability and DNA binding ability of the DNA binding domains of interferon regulatory factors 1 and 3

The thermodynamic properties and DNA binding ability of the N-terminal DNA binding domains of interferon regulatory factors IRF-1 (DBD1) and IRF-3 (DBD3) were studied using microcalorimetric and optical methods. DBD3 is significantly more stable than DBD1: at 20 degrees C the Gibbs energy of unfolding of DBD3 is -28.6 kJ/mol, which is 2 times larger than that of DBD1, -14.9 kJ/mol. Fluorescence anisotropy titration experiments showed that at this temperature the association constants with the PRDI binding site are 1.1 x 10(6) M(-)(1) for DBD1 and 3.6 x 10(6) M(-)(1) for DBD3, corresponding to Gibbs energies of association of -34 and -37 kJ/mol, respectively. However, the larger binding energy of DBD3 is due to its larger electrostatic component, while its nonelectrostatic component is smaller than that of DBD1. Therefore, DBD1 appears to have more sequence specificity than DBD3. Binding of DBD1 to target DNA is characterized by a substantially larger negative enthalpy than binding of DBD3, implying that the more flexible structure of DBD1 forms tighter contacts with DNA than the more rigid structure of DBD3. Thus, the strength of the DBDs' specific association with DNA is inversely related to the stability of the free DBDs.     

Reassortment of DNA recognition domains and the evolution of new specificities

Type I restriction enzymes comprise three subunits only one of which, the S polypeptide, dictates the specificity of the DNA sequence recognized. Recombination between two different hsdS genes, SP and SB, led to the isolation of a system, SQ, which had a different specificity from that of either parent. The finding that the nucleotide sequence recognized by SQ is a hybrid containing components from both the SP and SB target sequences suggested that DNA recognition is carried out by two separable domains within each specificity polypeptide. To test this we have made the recombinant gene of reciprocal structure and demonstrate that it encodes a polypeptide whose recognition sequence, deduced in vivo, is as predicted by this model. We also report the sequence of the SB specificity gene, so that information is now available for the five known members of this family of enzymes. All show a similar organization of conserved and variable regions. Comparisons of the predicted amino acid sequences reveal large non-conserved areas which may not even be structurally similar. This is remarkable since these different S subunits are functionally identical, except for the specificity with respect to the DNA sequence with which they interact. We discuss the correlation of the variation in polypeptide sequence with recognition specificities.     

Reassortment of DNA recognition domains and the evolution of new specificities

Type I restriction enzymes comprise three subunits only one of which, the S polypeptide, dictates the specificity of the DNA sequence recognized. Recombination between two different hsdS genes, SP and SB, led to the isolation of a system, SQ, which had a different specificity from that of either parent. The finding that the nucleotide sequence recognized by SQ is a hybrid containing components from both the SP and SB target sequences suggested that DNA recognition is carried out by two separable domains within each specificity polypeptide. To test this we have made the recombinant gene of reciprocal structure and demonstrate that it encodes a polypeptide whose recognition sequence, deduced In vivo, is as predicted by this model. We also report the sequence of the SB specificity gene, so that information is now available for the five known members of this family of enzymes. Ali show a similar organization of conserved and variable regions. Comparisons of the predicted amino acid sequences reveal large non-conserved areas which may not even be structurally similar. This is remarkable since these different S subunits are functionally identical, except for the specificity with respect to the DNA sequence with which they interact. We discuss the correlation of the variation in polypeptide sequence with recognition specificities.     

Establishment of distinct MyoD, E2A, and twist DNA binding specificities by different basic region-DNA conformations

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins perform a wide variety of biological functions. Most bHLH proteins recognize the consensus DNA sequence CAN NTG (the E-box consensus sequence is underlined) but acquire further functional specificity by preferring distinct internal and flanking bases. In addition, induction of myogenesis by MyoD-related bHLH proteins depends on myogenic basic region (BR) and BR-HLH junction residues that are not essential for binding to a muscle-specific site, implying that their BRs may be involved in other critical interactions. We have investigated whether the myogenic residues influence DNA sequence recognition and how MyoD, Twist, and their E2A partner proteins prefer distinct CAN NTG sites. In MyoD, the myogenic BR residues establish specificity for particular CAN NTG sites indirectly, by influencing the conformation through which the BR helix binds DNA. An analysis of DNA binding by BR and junction mutants suggests that an appropriate BR-DNA conformation is necessary but not sufficient for myogenesis, supporting the model that additional interactions with this region are important. The sequence specificities of E2A and Twist proteins require the corresponding BR residues. In addition, mechanisms that position the BR allow E2A to prefer distinct half-sites as a heterodimer with MyoD or Twist, indicating that the E2A BR can be directed toward different targets by dimerization with different partners. Our findings indicate that E2A and its partner bHLH proteins bind to CAN NTG sites by adopting particular preferred BR-DNA conformations, from which they derive differences in sequence recognition that can be important for functional specificity.     

The N-terminal fingers of chicken GATA-2 and GATA-3 are independent sequence-specific DNA binding domains.

The GATA family of vertebrate DNA binding regulatory proteins are expressed in diverse tissues and at different times of development. However, the DNA binding regions of these proteins possess considerable homology and recognize a rather similar range of DNA sequence motifs. DNA binding is mediated through two domains, each containing a zinc finger. Previous results have led to the conclusion that although in some cases the N-terminal finger can contribute to specificity and strength of binding, it does not bind independently, whereas the C-terminal finger is both necessary and sufficient for binding. Here we show that although this is true for the N-terminal finger of GATA-1, those of GATA-2 and GATA-3 are capable of strong independent binding with a preference for the motif GATC. Binding requires the presence of two basic regions located on either side of the N-terminal finger. The absence of one of these near the GATA-1 N-terminal finger probably accounts for its inability to bind. The combination of a single finger and two basic regions is a new variant of a motif that has been previously found in the binding domains of other finger proteins. Our results suggest that the DNA binding properties of the N-terminal finger may help distinguish GATA-2 and GATA-3 from GATA-1 and the other GATA family members in their selective regulatory roles in vivo.     

Antp-type homeodomains have distinct DNA binding specificities that correlate with their different regulatory functions in embryos.

Much of the functional specificity of Drosophila homeotic selector proteins, in their ability to regulate specific genes and to assign specific segmental identities, appears to map within their different, but closely related homeodomains. For example, the Drosophila Dfd and human HOX4B (Hox 4.2) proteins, which have extensive structural similarity only in their respective homeodomains, both specifically activate the Dfd promoter. In contrast, a chimeric Dfd protein containing the Ubx homeodomain (Dfd/Ubx) specifically activates the Antp P1 promoter, which is normally targeted by Ubx. Using a variety of DNA binding assays, we find significant differences in DNA binding preferences between the Dfd, Dfd/Ubx and Ubx proteins when Dfd and Antp upstream regulatory sequences are used as binding substrates. No significant differences in DNA binding specificity were detected between the human HOX4B (Hox 4.2) and Drosophila Dfd proteins. All of these full-length proteins bound as monomers to high affinity DNA binding sites, and interference assays indicate that they interact with DNA in a way that is very similar to homeodomain polypeptides. These experiments indicate that the ninth amino acid of the recognition helix of the homeodomain, which is glutamine in all four of these Antp-type homeodomain proteins, is not sufficient to determine their DNA binding specificities. The good correlation between the in vitro DNA binding preferences of these four Antp-type homeodomain proteins and their ability to specifically regulate a Dfd enhancer element in the embryo, suggests that the modest binding differences that distinguish them make an important contribution to their unique regulatory specificities.     

A comparison of the different DNA binding specificities of the bZip proteins C/EBP and GCN4.

The bZip proteins GCN4 and C/EBP differ in their DNA binding specificities: GCN4 binds well to the pseudopalindromic AP1 site 5'-A4T3G2A1C0T1C2'A3'T4'-3' and to the palindromic ATF/CREB sequence 5'-A4T3G2A1-C0*G0'T1'C2'A3'T4'-3'; C/EBP preferentially recognizes the palindromic sequence 5'-A4T3T2G1C0*G0'C1'A2'-A3'T4'-3'. According to the X-ray structures of GCN4-DNA complexes, five residues of the basic region of GCN4 are involved in specific base contacts: asparagine -18, alanine -15, alanine -14, serine -11 and arginine -10 (numbered relative to the start point of the leucine zipper, which we define as +1). In the basic region of C/EBP position -14 is occupied by valine instead of alanine, the other four residues being identical. Here we analyse the role of valine -14 in C/EBP-DNA complex formation. Starting from a C/EBP-GCN4 chimeric bZip peptide which displays C/EBP specificity, we systematically mutated position -14 of its basic region and characterized the DNA binding specificities of the 20 possible different peptides by gel mobility shift assays with various target sites. We present evidence that valine -14 of C/EBP interacts more strongly with thymine 2 than with cytosine 1' of the C/EBP binding site, unlike the corresponding alanine -14 of GCN4, which exclusively contacts thymine 1' of the GCN4 binding sites.