Response properties of electrosensory neurons in the lateral mesencephalic nucleus of the paddlefish

Many fishes and amphibians are able to sense weak electric fields from prey animals or other sources. The response properties of primary afferent fibers innervating the electroreceptors and information processing at the level of the hindbrain is well investigated in a number of taxa. However, there are only a few studies in higher brain areas. We recorded from electrosensory neurons in the lateral mesencephalic nucleus (LMN) and from neurons in the dorsal octavolateral nucleus (DON) of the paddlefish. We stimulated with sine wave stimuli of different amplitudes and frequencies and with moving DC stimuli. During sinusoidal stimulation, DON units increased their firing rate during the negative cycle of the sine wave and decreased their firing rate to the positive cycle. Lateral mesencephalic nucleus units increased their rate for both half cycles of the sine wave. Lateral mesencephalic nucleus units are more sensitive than DON units, especially to small moving dipoles. Dorsal octavolateral nucleus units respond to a moving DC dipole with an increase followed by a decrease in spike rate or vice versa, depending on movement direction and dipole orientation. Lateral mesencephalic nucleus units, in contrast, increased their discharge rate for all stimuli. Any change in discharge rate of DON units is converted in the LMN to a discharge rate increase. Lateral mesencephalic nucleus units therefore appear to code the presence of a stimulus regardless of orientation and motion direction.     

The electric sense of the paddlefish: a passive system for the detection and capture of zooplankton prey.

Behavioral and electrophysiological experiments have shown that the elongated paddlefish rostrum, with its extensive population of ampullae of Lorenzini, constitutes a passive electrosensory antenna of great sensitivity and spatial resolution. As demonstrated in juvenile paddlefish, the passive electrosense serves a novel function in feeding serving as the primary, if not exclusive sensory modality for the detection and capture of zooplanktonic prey. Ampullary receptors are sensitive to the weak electrical fields of plankton from distances up to 9 cm, and juvenile paddlefish capture plankton individually with great swimming dexterity in the absence of vision or other stimulus signals. Paddlefish also detect and avoid metal obstacles, the electrical signatures of which are a potential hindrance to their feeding and reproductive migrations. The ampullary receptors, their peripheral innervation and central targets in the dorsal octavolateral nucleus, are described. We also describe the ascending and descending neuronal circuitry of the electrosensory system in the brain based on tracer studies using dextran amines.     

Functional organization of the electroreceptive midbrain in an elasmobranch (Platyrhinoidis triseriata)

The response properties of 322 single units in the electroreceptive midbrain (lateral mesencephalic nucleus, LMN) of the thornback ray, Platyrhinoidis triseriata, were studied using uniform and local electric fields. Tactile, visual, or auditory stimuli were also presented to test for multimodality. Most LMN electrosensory units (81%) are silent in the absence of stimulation. Those with spontaneous activity fired irregularly at 0.5 to 5 impulses/s, the lower values being more common. Two units had firing rates greater than 10/s. Midbrain electrosensory units are largely phasic, responding with one or a few spikes per stimulus onset or offset or both, but the adaptation characteristics of some neurons are complex. The same neuron can exhibit phasic or phasic-tonic responses, depending upon orientation of the electric field. Tonic units without any initial phasic over-shoot were not recorded. Even the phasic-tonic units adapt to a step stimulus within several seconds. Unit thresholds are generally lower than 0.3 microV/cm, the weakest stimulus delivered, although thresholds as high as 5 microV/cm were recorded, Neuronal responses reach a maximum, with few exceptions, at 100 microV/cm and decrease rapidly at higher intensities. LMN neurons are highly sensitive to stimulus repetition rates: most responded to frequencies of 5 pulses/s or less; none responded to rates greater than 10/s. Three distinct response patterns are recognized. Best frequencies in response to sinusoidal stimuli range from 0.2 Hz (the lowest frequency delivered) to 4 Hz. Responses decrease rapidly at 8 Hz or greater, and no units responded to frequencies greater than 32 Hz. Most LMN neurons have small, well defined excitatory electroreceptive fields (RFs) exhibiting no surround inhibition, at least as detectable by methods employed here. Seventy-eight percent of units recorded had RFs restricted to the ventral surface: of these, 98% were contralateral. The remaining 22% of units had disjunct dorsal and ventral receptive fields. Electrosensory RFs on the ventral surface are somatotopically organized. Anterior, middle, and posterior body surfaces are mapped at the rostral, middle, and caudal levels, respectively, of the contralateral LMN. The lateral, middle, and medial body are mapped at medial, middle, and lateral levels of the nucleus. Moreover, the RFs of all units isolated in a given dorsoventral electrode track are nearly superimposable. About 40% of LMN, measured from the dorsal surface, is devoted to input from ventral electroreceptors located in a small region rostral and lateral to the mouth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The cerebellar dorsal granular ridge in an elasmobranch has proprioceptive and electroreceptive representations and projects homotopically to the medullary electrosensory nucleus

1. Response properties of neurons in the dorsal granular ridge (DGR) of the little skate, Raja erinacea, were studied in decerebrate, curarized fish. Sensory responses included proprioceptive (426 of 952; 45%) and electroreceptive units (526 of 952; 55%). Electroreceptive units responded to weak electric fields with a higher threshold than lower-order units and had large ipsilateral receptive fields, whose exact boundaries were often unclear but contained smaller, identifiable best areas. Proprioceptive units responded to displacement of the ipsilateral fin and were either position-or movement-sensitive.
2. Both proprioceptive and electroreceptive units showed a progression of receptive fields from anterior to posterior body in the rostral to caudal direction along the length of DGR. Sensory maps in DGR projected homotopically to the electrosensory somatotopy in the dorsal nucleus. Peak evoked potentials and units responding to local DGR stimulation occurred only in areas of the dorsal nucleus with receptive fields located within the composite receptive field at the DGR stimulation site.
3. Single shocks to DGR produced a short spike train followed by a prolonged suppression period in the medullary dorsal nucleus. These results have implications for the role of the parallel fiber system in medullary electrosensory processing.

     

Two modes of information processing in the electrosensory system of the paddlefish (Polyodon spathula)

Paddlefish are uniquely adapted for the detection of their prey, small water fleas, by primarily using their passive electrosensory system. In a recent anatomical study, we found two populations of secondary neurons in the electrosensory hind brain area (dorsal octavolateral nucleus, DON). Cells in the anterior DON project to the contralateral tectum, whereas cells in the posterior DON project bilaterally to the torus semicircularis and lateral mesencephalic nucleus. In this study, we investigated the properties of both populations and found that they form two physiologically different populations. Cells in the posterior DON are about one order of magnitude more sensitive and respond better to stimuli with lower frequency content than anterior cells. The posterior cells are, therefore, better suited to detect distant prey represented by low-amplitude signals at the receptors, along with a lower frequency spectrum, whereas cells in the anterior DON may only be able to sense nearby prey. This suggests the existence of two distinct channels for electrosensory information processing: one for proximal signals via the anterior DON and one for distant stimuli via the posterior DON with the sensory input fed into the appropriate ascending channels based on the relative sensitivity of both cell populations.     

Anatomy of the mechanosensory lateral line canal system and electrosensory ampullae of Lorenzini in two species of sawshark (fam. Pristiophoridae)

It has long been assumed that the elongated rostra (the saws) of sawsharks (family: Pristiophoridae) and sawfish (family: Pristidae) serve a similar function. Recent behavioural and anatomical studies have shed light on the dual function of the pristid rostrum in mechanosensory and electrosensory prey detection and prey manipulation. Here, the authors examine the distributions of the mechanosensory lateral line canals and electrosensory ampullae of Lorenzini in the southern sawshark, Pristiophorus nudipinnis and the longnose sawshark, Pristiophorus cirratus. In both species, the receptive fields of the mechano- and electrosensory systems extend the full length of the rostrum indicating that the sawshark rostrum serves a sensory function. Interestingly, despite recent findings suggesting they feed at different trophic levels, minimal interspecific variation between the two species was recorded. Nonetheless, compared to pristids, the pristiophorid rostrum possesses a reduced mechanosensory sampling field but higher electrosensory resolution, which suggests that pristiophorids may not use their rostrums to disable large prey like pristids do.     

Information-processing demands in electrosensory and mechanosensory lateral line systems.

The electrosensory and mechanosensory lateral line systems of fish exhibit many common features in their structural and functional organization, both at the sensory periphery as well as in central processing pathways. These two sensory systems also appear to play similar roles in many behavioral tasks such as prey capture, orientation with respect to external environmental cues, navigation in low-light conditions, and mediation of interactions with nearby animals. In this paper, we briefly review key morphological, physiological, and behavioral aspects of these two closely related sensory systems. We present arguments that the information processing demands associated with spatial processing are likely to be quite similar, due largely to the spatial organization of both systems and the predominantly dipolar nature of many electrosensory and mechanosensory stimulus fields. Demands associated with temporal processing may be quite different, however, due primarily to differences in the physical bases of electrosensory and mechanosensory stimuli (e.g. speed of transmission). With a better sense of the information processing requirements, we turn our attention to an analysis of the functional organization of the associated first-order sensory nuclei in the hindbrain, including the medial octavolateral nucleus (MON), dorsal octavolateral nucleus (DON), and electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL). One common feature of these systems is a set of neural mechanisms for improving signal-to-noise ratios, including mechanisms for adaptive suppression of reafferent signals. This comparative analysis provides new insights into how the nervous system extracts biologically significant information from dipolar stimulus fields in order to solve a variety of behaviorally relevant problems faced by aquatic animals.     

Neural simulations of adaptive reafference suppression in the elasmobranch electrosensory system

The electrosensory system of elasmobranchs is extremely sensitive to weak electric fields, with behavioral thresholds having been reported at voltage gradients as low as 5 nV/cm. To achieve this amazing sensitivity, the electrosensory system must extract weak extrinsic signals from a relatively large reafferent background signal associated with the animal's own movements. Ventilatory movements, in particular, strongly modulate the firing rates of primary electrosensory afferent nerve fibers, but this modulation is greatly suppressed in the medullary electrosensory processing nucleus, the dorsal octavolateral nucleus. Experimental evidence suggests that the neural basis of reafference suppression involves a common-mode rejection mechanism supplemented by an adaptive filter that fine tunes the cancellation. We present a neural model and computer simulation results that support the hypothesis that the adaptive component may involve an anti-Hebbian form of synaptic plasticity at molecular layer synapses onto ascending efferent neurons, the principal output neurons of the nucleus. Parallel fibers in the molecular layer carry a wealth of proprioceptive, efference copy, and sensory signals related to the animal's own movements. The proposed adaptive mechanism acts by canceling out components of the electrosensory input signal that are consistently correlated with these internal reference signals.Abbreviations AEN ascending efferent neuron - AFF primary afferent nerve fiber - DGR dorsal granular ridge - DON dorsal octavolateral nucleus - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - GABA -aminobutyric acid - IN inhibitory interneuron - ISI interspike interval - ST stellate cell     

Descending input from the vestibulolateral cerebellum suppresses electrosensory responses in the dorsal octavolateralis nucleus of the elasmobranch,Raja erinacea

1. The dorsal octavolateralis nucleus is the primary electrosensory nucleus in elasmobranchs and receives a major descending input from the dorsal granular ridge (DGR), a part of the vestibulolateral cerebellum. Removal of DGR altered the response properties of ascending efferent neurons (AENs), the projection neurons of the dorsal octavolateralis nucleus.
2. Elimination of DGR by lesion or lidocaine microinjection increased the excitability in AENs. Spontaneous activity increased by 680% and receptive fields became 1300% larger. The sensitivity of AENs to electric field stimuli increased by 560% and the time constant of adaptation increased by 300%, while threshold sensitivity remained unchanged.
3. Some electrosensory units responded to proprioceptive stimuli. In intact animals, the spontaneous activity of AENs was much less modulated by changes in fin position than primary electroreceptor afferents. Lesions to DGR appeared to increase the responsiveness of AENs to changes in fin position.
4. These results indicate that the action of DGR on the dorsal octavolateralis nucleus is primarily inhibitory and may function in a gain control mechanism. The possibility also exists for a mechanical-reafferent reduction mechanism in the electrosensory system of the elasmobranch that may be mediated by DGR.

     

Receptive field properties of neurons in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of the weakly electric fish, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Gnathonemus petersii</Emphasis>

The receptive field of a sensory neuron is known as that region in sensory space where a stimulus will alter the response of the neuron. We determined the spatial dimensions and the shape of receptive fields of electrosensitive neurons in the medial zone of the electrosensory lateral line lobe of the African weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii, by using single cell recordings. The medial zone receives input from sensory cells which encode the stimulus amplitude. We analysed the receptive fields of 71 neurons. The size and shape of the receptive fields were determined as a function of spike rate and first spike latency and showed differences for the two analysis methods used. Spatial diameters ranged from 2 to 36 mm (spike rate) and from 2.45 to 14.12 mm (first spike latency). Some of the receptive fields were simple consisting only of one uniform centre, whereas most receptive fields showed a complex and antagonistic centre-surround organisation. Several units had a very complex structure with multiple centres and surrounding-areas. While receptive field size did not correlate with peripheral receptor location, the complexity of the receptive fields increased from rostral to caudal along the fish's body.     

Medullary electrosensory processing in the little skate

1. Ampullary electroreceptors in elasmobranchs are innervated by fibers of the ALLN, which projects to the dorsal octavolateralis nucleus (DON). The purpose of this study is to examine the response characteristics of ALLN fibers and DON neurons to weak D.C. and sinusoidal electric field stimuli presented as local dipole fields. 2. ALLN fibers respond to presentation of D.C. fields with a phasic burst, followed by a more slowly adapting period of firing. Ascending efferent neurons (AENs) in the DON respond to stimuli with a similar initial burst, which adapts more quickly. 3. Type 1, 2, and 3 neurons are possible local interneurons or commissural DON neurons. Type 1 neurons demonstrate response properties similar to those of AENs. Type 2 cells demonstrated slowly adapting responses to excitatory stimuli, the duration of the response increased with the amplitude of the stimulus. Type 3 neurons demonstrated an increased rate of firing, but the response lacked any specific temporal characteristics. 4. ALLN fibers typically have receptive fields consisting of a single ampulla. The receptive field sizes of DON neurons exhibited varying degrees of convergence for different cell types. 5. Responses of ALLN fibers and DON neurons to weak sinusoidal stimuli demonstrated very similar frequency response characteristics for all cell types. The peak sensitivity of electrosensory neurons was between 5-10 Hz.     

Response of Cat Ventrolateral Spinal Axons to an Itch-Producing Stimulus (Cowhage)

A comparison was made between different categories of mechanically sensitive, ventrolateral spinal axons to assess their sensitivity to the itch-producing substance cowhage. Of 52 wide-dynamic-range (WDR) units, 17 had contralateral, 22 had ipsilateral, and 13 had bilateral receptive fields. Of the 5 low-threshold units, 1 had an ipsilateral receptive field and the remainder were bilateral. Among the high-threshold units, 10 were contralateral, 6 ipsilateral, and 5 bilateral. Although there was no evidence of cowhage sensitivity in either low- or high-threshold spinal axons, neurons with WDR properties were reactive to cowhage. WDR neurons were subclassified on the basis of their resting discharge pattern as having intermittent, continuous, or no resting discharge. WDR units with an intermittent pattern of resting discharge demonstrated a significant sensitivity to active cowhage and hence might be regarded as pruritogen-responsive spinal axons. Inactive cowhage was used as a control stimulus. In some WDR units with large receptive fields, there were observations suggesting convergence of chemoreceptive and mechanoreceptive inputs, which produced inhibitory as well as excitatory effects.     

Response of cat ventrolateral spinal axons to an itch-producing stimulus (cowhage).

A comparison was made between different categories of mechanically sensitive, ventrolateral spinal axons to assess their sensitivity to the itch-producing substance cowhage. Of 52 wide-dynamic-range (WDR) units, 17 had contralateral, 22 had ipsilateral, and 13 had bilateral receptive fields. Of the 5 low-threshold units, 1 had an ipsilateral receptive field and the remainder were bilateral. Among the high-threshold units, 10 were contralateral, 6 ipsilateral, and 5 bilateral. Although there was no evidence of cowhage sensitivity in either low- or high-threshold spinal axons, neurons with WDR properties were reactive to cowhage. WDR neurons were subclassified on the basis of their resting discharge pattern as having intermittent, continuous, or no resting discharge. WDR units with an intermittent pattern of resting discharge demonstrated a significant sensitivity to active cowhage and hence might be regarded as pruritogen-responsive spinal axons. Inactive cowhage was used as a control stimulus. In some WDR units with large receptive fields, there were observations suggesting convergence of chemoreceptive and mechanoreceptive inputs, which produced inhibitory as well as excitatory effects.     

食蚊鱼的生物电场特征

文章采用活体记录的方法测量了食蚊鱼(Gambusia affinis)的生物电场。实验分单尾鱼、两尾鱼同向和两尾鱼反向三组测量, 每组10 个重复。结果表明:单尾鱼的生物电场表现为头负、尾正的偶极子直流电场,头部相对电势为(242.4) V, 尾部为(211.6) V, 且头部附近产生1-3 Hz 与呼吸频率对应的交流呼吸电场, 大小为(4.20.8) V。两尾鱼生物电场测量表明, 其直流电场均大于单尾鱼(P0.05); 两尾鱼同向靠近时产生的交流呼吸电场显著大于单尾鱼(P0.01), 而反向靠近时产生的呼吸电场显著小于单尾鱼(P0.001)。这表明两条鱼不同方向靠近时, 可通过呼吸作用改变交流呼吸电场的大小。此种现象对于依靠感知交流呼吸电场来摄食的被动电感受鱼类是不利的。       

Coding of sound location and frequency in the auditory midbrain of diurnal birds of prey,families accipitridae and falconidae

Summary The coding of sound frequency and location in the avian auditory midbrain nucleus (nMLD) was examined in three diurnal raptors: the brown falcon (Falco berigora), the swamp harrier (Circus aeruginosus) and the brown goshawk (Accipiter fasciatus). Previously this nucleus has been studied with free field stimuli in only one other species, the barn owl (Tyto alba).We found some parallels between the organisation of nMLD in the diurnal raptors and that reported in the barn owl in that the central region of nMLD was tonotopically organised and contained cells that did not encode location, and the lateral region (nMLDl) contained cells which were sensitive to stimulus position. However, unlike the barn owl, which has units with circumscribed receptive fields, cells sensitive to stimulus location had large receptive fields which were restricted in azimuth but not in elevation (hemifield units). Such cells could not provide an acoustic space map in which both azimuthal and elevational dimensions were represented, but there was a tendency for units with contralateral borders to be found superficially, and those with ipsilateral borders to be found deep, in nMLDl. Hemifield units displayed receptive field properties consistent with the directional properties of the tympana in the presence of sound transmission through the interaural canal, if there is a central mechanism which is sensitive to interaural intensity differences.Abbreviations nMLD nucleus mesencephalicus lateralis pars dorsalis - SPL sound pressure level re 20 Pa - nMLDl lateral region of nMLD - ICC central nucleus of the inferior colliculus - ICX external nucleus of the inferior colliculus - IID interaural intensity difference - EI excitatory inhibitory     

End buds: non-ampullary electroreceptors in adult lampreys

Summary Shared anatomical and physiological characters indicate that the low-frequency sensitive electrosensory system of lampreys is homologous with those of non-teleost fishes and amphibians. However, the ampullary electroreceptor organs which characterize all of these gnathostomes are not found in lampreys. Experimental anatomical and physiological studies reported here demonstrate that the epidermal end buds are the electroreceptors of adult lampreys.End buds, consisting of both sensory and supporting cells, are goblet-shaped with the top (25–60 m diameter) at the epidermal surface and the stem directed toward the dermis (Fig. 1A). Short lines or clusters of 2–8 end buds (Fig. 1B) are distributed over both trunk and head. Injections of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) into vitally-stained end buds labeled anterior lateral line afferents terminating in the ipsilateral dorsal nucleus (Fig. 2A) — the primary electrosensory nucleus of the lamprey medulla. Conversely, after HRP injection into the dorsal nucleus HRP-filled fibers and terminals were present on ipsilateral end buds (Fig. 2B).End buds are usually not visible without staining. However, in adult sea lampreys the presence of end buds was histologically confirmed in skin patches containing the receptive fields of electroreceptor fibers recorded in the anterior lateral line nerve. Additionally, in the rare instance of two silver lampreys in which end buds were visible without staining, electrosensory activity indistinguishable from that of the primary electroreceptor afferents was recorded from the end bud surface (Figs. 3, 4).End buds were initially characterized as chemoreceptors (Johnston 1902) but were later correctly advanced as lateralis receptors based on the presence of presynaptic dense bodies in the receptor cells (Whitear and Lane 1981). Unlike all other low-frequency electroreceptors, end buds lack canals. The receptor cells contact the epidermal surface and possess apical microvilli rather than the kinocilium of most gnathostomes with homologous electrosensory systems of the primitive (non-teleost) type.Larval lampreys and newly transformed adults lack end buds although at least the latter are electroreceptive. End buds, therefore, may be the form taken by electroreceptors only in the final portion of a lamprey's life.     

Differential wavelength sensitivity in the receptive fields of sustaining fibers in the optic tract of the crayfishProcambarus

Summary Spike discharges were measured at 473 nm and at 573 nm in 40–50 individual sustaining fibers (slowly-adapting units signaling intensity levels over large receptive fields). The units belonged to five of the 14 classes of sustaining fibers recognized by Wiersma and Yamaguchi (1966) on the basis of the positions of their receptive fields. The test wavelengths were selected because they lie near the peaks of sensitivity of the two spectral types of receptor known to be present in the ommatida. Relative sensitivity was measured at 5 ° intervals as the test lights were moved around the eye on various arcs, and the receptive fields were described in terms of contours of equal sensitivity for each wavelength.No large differences in relative spectral sensitivity were observed as a function of position in the receptive field, but there was a consistent tendency for sensitivity to blue light to be relatively greater in the dorsal region of the eye. The difference was modest, generally being 0.5 log units or less. This effect could be caused either by regional variation in the population density of the blue and yellow-green receptors, or by weighting of inputs in the optic neuropile.This work was supported by USPHS research grant EY00222 to Yale University. A.E.R.W. was aided by a Fulbright-Hays travel grant.     

The paddlefish rostrum functions as an electrosensory antenna in plankton feeding

A novel electrosensory function is presented for the large, plankton-feeding, freshwater paddlefish, Polyodon spathula, along with a hypothesis which accounts for the distinctive, elongated rostrum of this unusual fish. Behavioural experiments conducted in the ''dark'' (under infrared illumination), to eliminate vision, show that paddlefish efficiently capture planktonic prey to distances up to 80–90 mm. They make feeding strikes at dipole electrodes in response to weak low-frequency electrical currents. Fish also avoid metal obstacles placed in the water, again in the dark. Electrophysiological experiments confirm that the Lorenzinian ampullae of paddlefish are sensitive to weak, low-frequency electrical signals, and demonstrate unequivocally that they respond to the very small electrical signals generated by their natural zooplankton prey (Daphnia sp.). We propose that the rostrum constitutes the biological equivalent of an electrical antenna, enabling the fish to accurately detect and capture its planktonic food in turbid river environments where vision is severely limited. The electrical sensitivity of paddlefish to metallic substrates may interfere with their migrations through locks and dams.     

Central Lateral Line and Auditory Pathways: A Phylogenetic Perspective

The phylogenetic origins of the lateral line electrosensory,lateral line mechanosensory, and auditory components of theoctavolateralis system are unknown but each of these sensorymodalities appears to have evolved early in vertebrate history.The octavolateralis terminal field occupies a large area ofthe dorsolateral wall of the medulla and among agnathids, cartilaginousfishes, non-teleost bony fishes and, with modifications, urodeles,consists of a dorsal electrosensory nucleus, a medial mechanosensorynucleus and a ventral octaval nuclear complex. This arrangementof medullary octavolateral nuclei, which differs from that ofnon-electroreceptive and electroreceptive teleosts, is consideredthe primitive plan and is retained in that phyletic line leadingto tetrapods. Separate and parallel pathways are known, in elasmobranchsand a few teleosts, to ascend from each medullary lateral linecenter to the midbrain and presumably from midbrain to telencephaliclevels via thalamic relays. There is no evidence, with the lossof lateral line senses among some amphibians and all amniotes,that the central neural pathways and nuclei are retained andused to process information from other sensory modalities. Theanatomy of the central auditory system of fishes is unknownbut is required for an understanding of whether auditory nucleiand pathways are retained during the fishamphibian transition,or whether new ones arise, to process information from independentlyevolved peripheral receptors.     

Adaptive processing in electrosensory systems: Links to cerebellar plasticity and learning

The first central stage of electrosensory processing in fish takes place in structures with local circuitry that resembles the cerebellum. Cerebellum-like structures and the cerebellum itself share common patterns of gene expression and may also share developmental and evolutionary origins. Given these similarities it is natural to ask whether insights gleaned from the study of cerebellum-like structures might be useful for understanding aspects of cerebellar function and vice versa. Work from electrosensory systems has shown that cerebellum-like circuitry acts to generate learned predictions about the sensory consequences of the animals’ own behavior through a process of associative plasticity at parallel fiber synapses. Subtraction of these predictions from the actual sensory input serves to highlight unexpected and hence behaviorally relevant features. Learning and prediction are also central to many current ideas regarding the function of the cerebellum itself. The present review draws comparisons between cerebellum-like structures and the cerebellum focusing on the properties and sites of synaptic plasticity in these structures and on connections between plasticity and learning. Examples are drawn mainly from the electrosensory lobe (ELL) of mormyrid fish and from extensive work characterizing the role of the cerebellum in Pavlovian eyelid conditioning and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) modification. Parallels with other cerebellum-like structures, including the gymnotid ELL, the elasmobranch dorsal octavolateral nucleus (DON), and the mammalian dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) are also discussed.