The evolution of chloroplast RNA editing

RNA editing alters the nucleotide sequence of an RNA molecule so that it deviates from the sequence of its DNA template. Different RNA-editing systems are found in the major eukaryotic lineages, and these systems are thought to have evolved independently. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of data on C-to-U editing sites in land plant chloroplasts and propose a model for the evolution of RNA editing in land plants. First, our data suggest that the limited RNA-editing system of seed plants and the much more extensive systems found in hornworts and ferns are of monophyletic origin. Further, although some eukaryotic editing systems appear to have evolved to regulate gene expression, or at least are now involved in gene regulation, there is no evidence that RNA editing plays a role in gene regulation in land plant chloroplasts. Instead, our results suggest that land plant chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing originated as a mechanism to generate variation at the RNA level, which could complement variation at the DNA level. Under this model, many of the original sites, particularly in seed plants, have been subsequently lost due to mutation at the DNA level, and the function of extant sites is merely to conserve certain codons. This is the first comprehensive model for the evolution of the chloroplast RNA-editing system of land plants and may also be applicable to the evolution of RNA editing in plant mitochondria.     

高等植物叶绿体RNA编辑研究进展

RNA编辑普遍存在于陆生植物中,在高等植物叶绿体中以C→U的替换为主,可能是叶绿体产生功能蛋白的重要方式。近年来,使用体外分析、叶绿体转化和紫外交联等技术,使叶绿体RNA编辑机制的研究取得较大进展。本文对这些新的进展进行了概述,并对高等植物叶绿体RNA编辑研究中有待解决的问题进行了展望。     

In vitro RNA editing in plant mitochondria does not require added energy

RNA editing in flowering plant mitochondria is investigated by in vitro assays. These cauliflower mitochondrial lysates require added NTP or dNTP. We have now resolved the reason for this requirement to be the inhibition of the RNA binding activity of the glutamate dehydrogenases (GDH). Both GDH1 and GDH2 were identified in RNA-protein cross-links. The inhibition of in vitro RNA editing by GDH is confirmed by the ability of the GDH-specific herbicide phosphinothricin to substitute for NTP. NADH and NADPH, but not NAD or NADP, can also replace NTP, suggesting that the NAD(P)H-binding-pocket configuration of the GDH contacts the RNA. RNA editing in plant mitochondria is thus intrinsically independent of added energy in the form of NTP.     

Improved design of hammerhead ribozyme for selective digestion of target RNA through recognition of site-specific adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is an endogenous regulatory mechanism involved in various biological processes. Site-specific, editing-state–dependent degradation of target RNA may be a powerful tool both for analyzing the mechanism of RNA editing and for regulating biological processes. Previously, we designed an artificial hammerhead ribozyme (HHR) for selective, site-specific RNA cleavage dependent on the A-to-I RNA editing state. In the present work, we developed an improved strategy for constructing a trans-acting HHR that specifically cleaves target editing sites in the adenosine but not the inosine state. Specificity for unedited sites was achieved by utilizing a sequence encoding the intrinsic cleavage specificity of a natural HHR. We used in vitro selection methods in an HHR library to select for an extended HHR containing a tertiary stabilization motif that facilitates HHR folding into an active conformation. By using this method, we successfully constructed highly active HHRs with unedited-specific cleavage. Moreover, using HHR cleavage followed by direct sequencing, we demonstrated that this ribozyme could cleave serotonin 2C receptor (HTR2C) mRNA extracted from mouse brain, depending on the site-specific editing state. This unedited-specific cleavage also enabled us to analyze the effect of editing state at the E and C sites on editing at other sites by using direct sequencing for the simultaneous quantification of the editing ratio at multiple sites. Our approach has the potential to elucidate the mechanism underlying the interdependencies of different editing states in substrate RNA with multiple editing sites.     

Partially edited RNAs are intermediates of RNA editing in plant mitochondria

RNA editing in flowering plant mitochondria addresses several hundred specific C nucleotides in individual sequence contexts in mRNAs and tRNAs. Many of the in vivo steady state RNAs are edited at some sites but not at others. It is still unclear whether such incompletely edited RNAs can either be completed or are aborted. To learn more about the dynamics of the substrate recognition process, we investigated in vitro RNA editing at a locus in the atp4 mRNA where three editing sites are clustered within four nucleotides. A single cis-element of about 20 nucleotides serves in the recognition of at least two sites. Competition with this sequence element suppresses in vitro editing. Surprisingly, unedited and edited competitors are equally effective. Experiments with partially pre-edited substrates indicate that indeed the editing status of a substrate RNA does not affect the binding affinity of the specificity factor(s). RNA molecules in which all editing sites are substituted by either A or G still compete, confirming that editing site recognition can occur independently of the actual editing site. These results show that incompletely edited mRNAs can be substrates for further rounds of RNA editing, resolving a long debated question.     

The RanBP2 zinc finger domains of chloroplast RNA editing factor OZ1 are required for protein–protein interactions and conversion of C to U

In the chloroplast, organelle zinc finger 1 (OZ1) is a RanBP2-type zinc finger (Znf) protein required for many RNA editing events, a process by which specific cytosines are enzymatically converted to uracils as a correction mechanism for missense mutations in the organelle genomes. RNA editing is carried out by a large multi-protein complex called the ‘editosome’ that contains members of the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family, the RNA editing factor interacting protein (also known as MORF) family and the organelle RNA-recognition motif (ORRM) family, in addition to OZ1. OZ1 is an 82-kDa protein with distinct domains, including a pair of Znf domains and a unique C-terminal region. To elucidate the functions of these domains, we have generated truncations of OZ1 for use in protein–protein interaction assays that identified the C-terminal region of OZ1, as well as the Znf domains as the primary interactors with PPR proteins, which are factors required for site-specificity and enzymatic editing. Expression of these OZ1 truncations in vivo showed that the Znf domains were required to restore chloroplast RNA editing in oz1 knockout plants. Mutation of key structural residues in the Znf domains showed that they are necessary for editing and required for interaction with ORRM1, a general editing factor with an RNA-binding domain. These functional characterizations of the Znfs and novel C-terminal domain contribute to our understanding of the model for the chloroplast plant editosome.     

Identification of the chloroplast adenosine-to-inosine tRNA editing enzyme

Plastids (chloroplasts) of higher plants exhibit two types of conversional RNA editing: cytidine-to-uridine editing in mRNAs and adenosine-to-inosine editing in at least one plastid genome-encoded tRNA, the tRNA-Arg(ACG). The enzymes catalyzing RNA editing reactions in plastids are unknown. Here we report the identification of the A-to-I tRNA editing enzyme from chloroplasts of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. The protein (AtTadA) has an unusual structure in that it harbors a large N-terminal domain of >1000 amino acids, which is not required for catalytic activity. The C-terminal region of the protein displays sequence similarity to tadA, the tRNA adenosine deaminase from Escherichia coli. We show that AtTadA is imported into chloroplasts in vivo and demonstrate that the in vitro translated protein triggers A-to-I editing in the anticodon of the plastid tRNA-Arg(ACG). Suppression of AtTadA gene expression in transgenic Arabidopsis plants by RNAi results in reduced A-to-I editing in the chloroplast tRNA-Arg(ACG). The RNAi lines display a mild growth phenotype, presumably due to reduced chloroplast translational efficiency upon limited availability of edited tRNA-Arg(ACG).     

Mutations in CHLOROPLAST RNA BINDING provide evidence for the involvement of the chloroplast in the regulation of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis

The Arabidopsis circadian system regulates the expression of up to 36% of the nuclear genome, including many genes that encode photosynthetic proteins. The expression of nuclear-encoded photosynthesis genes is also regulated by signals from the chloroplasts, a process known as retrograde signaling. We have identified CHLOROPLAST RNA BINDING (CRB), a putative RNA-binding protein, and have shown that it is important for the proper functioning of the chloroplast. crb plants are smaller and paler than wild-type plants, and have altered chloroplast morphology and photosynthetic performance. Surprisingly, mutations in CRB also affect the circadian system, altering the expression of both oscillator and output genes. In order to determine whether the changes in circadian gene expression are specific to mutations in the CRB gene, or are more generally caused by the malfunctioning of the chloroplast, we also examined the circadian system in mutations affecting STN7, GUN1, and GUN5, unrelated nuclear-encoded chloroplast proteins known to be involved in retrograde signaling. Our results provide evidence that the functional state of the chloroplast may be an important factor that affects the circadian system.     

High‐throughput quantification of chloroplast RNA editing extent using multiplex RT‐PCR mass spectrometry

RNA editing in plants, animals, and humans modifies genomically encoded cytidine or adenosine nucleotides to uridine or inosine, respectively, in mRNAs. We customized the MassARRAY System (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, www.sequenom.com ) to assay multiplex PCR‐amplified single‐stranded cDNAs and easily analyse and display the captured data. By using appropriate oligonucleotide probes, the method can be tailored to any organism and gene where RNA editing occurs. Editing extent of up to 40 different nucleotides in each of either 94 or 382 different samples (3760 or 15 280 editing targets, respectively) can be examined by assaying a single plate and by performing one repetition. We have established this mass spectrometric method as a dependable, cost‐effective and time‐saving technique to examine the RNA editing efficiency at 37 Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast editing sites at a high level of multiplexing. The high‐throughput editing assay, named Multiplex RT‐PCR Mass Spectrometry (MRMS), is ideal for large‐scale experiments such as identifying population variation, examining tissue‐specific changes in editing extent, or screening a mutant or transgenic collection. Moreover, the required amount of starting material is so low that RNA from fewer than 50 cells can be examined without amplification. We demonstrate the use of the method to identify natural variation in editing extent of chloroplast C targets in a collection of Arabidopsis accessions.