Has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 19 case–control studies

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer risk. However, published data are still inconclusive. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer susceptibility until May 8, 2010. Nineteen published case–control studies including a total of 10,496 cases and 12,885 controls were acquired. Overall, Increased cancer risk was found in domain model (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03–1.35) rather than in other genetic models when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. Stratified analysis shown that significant association between rs2910164 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility was present in Asians (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01–1.29 for CG vs. CC; OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03–1.39 for GG + CG vs. CC), but not in Caucasian populations. In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, no significantly increased risk of breast, gastric, prostate or bladder cancer were found in any of the genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) is associated with increased cancer susceptibility in Asians. However, further well-designed studies with large sample size will be necessary to validate the risk identified in the current meta-analysis.     

RNASEL −1385G/A polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 21 case–control studies

Polymorphisms in the endoribonuclease L (RNASEL) gene have been hypothesized to increase the incidence of cancer. The common sequence variation in RNASEL, −1385G/A (rs486907) has been involved in several types of cancer risk. However, results of the related published studies remained conflicting rather than conclusive. To clarify the role of RNASEL −1385G/A genotype in global cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of all the available published studies involving 8,732 cancer patients and 8,748 control subjects. The overall results indicated that there was no major influence of the variant on cancer risk. However, stratified analysis by ethnicity showed that the RNASEL −1385G/A polymorphism has an increased cancer risk in African descendents in the homozygote comparison (OR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.27–5.27), although no association was found in the analysis stratified by cancer type (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.94–1.35). This meta-analysis suggested that the RNASEL −1385G/A polymorphism is associated with cancer risk in African descendents. To draw more comprehensive conclusions, further prospective studies with larger numbers of participants worldwide are still required to examine associations between RNASEL −1385G/A polymorphism and cancer risk.     

XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and esophageal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of case–control studies

The published data on the association between xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) Lys751Gln polymorphism and esophageal cancer (EC) remained controversial. The present meta-analysis of literatures was performed to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all case–control studies of Lys751Gln polymorphism and risk for two main types of EC: esophageal adenocarcinoma (EADC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A total of 12 studies were identified to the meta-analysis, including 2,575 cases (1,294 ESCC and 1,281 EADC) and 4,951 controls (1,891 ESCC and 3,060 EADC). Random-effects or fix-effects model was used according to between-study heterogeneity. The odds ratio (OR) for the variant homozygous genotype Gln/Gln of the Lys751Gln polymorphism, compared with the wild type homozygote Lys/Lys, was 1.26, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.02–1.56, for EADC risk without between-study heterogeneity. When stratified by ethnicity, statistically significantly elevated risk was found among Chinese (Gln/Gln vs. Lys/Lys: OR 2.45, 95% CI = 1.10–5.44). However, no significant associations were found between XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and EC risk when all studies pooled into the meta-analysis (Lys/Gln vs. Lys/Lys: OR 1.07, 95% CI = 0.88–1.28; Gln/Gln vs.us Lys/Lys: OR 1.25, 95% CI = 0.92–1.71; dominant model: OR 1.09, 95% CI = 0.90–1.33). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the Lys751Gln genetic polymorphism may be a potential biomarker of EC susceptibility in Chinese populations. And a study with the larger sample size is needed to further evaluate gene–environment interaction on XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism and EC risk.     

MDR1 C3435T polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 39 case–control studies

Multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene encodes the ATP-dependent cellular efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp) which efflux of a variety of substances across the membrane. P-gp could serve a role in cancer etiology based on its physiological role of protecting cells from xenobiotics or metabolites. The C3435T (rs1045642) polymorphism of the MDR1 gene which could influence the P-gp expression and function have been implicated in the cancer risk. However, the results from the published studies on the association between this polymorphism and cancer risk are conflicting. To drive a more precise estimation of this association, we performed a meta-analysis of 39 case-control studies, including a total of 9,265 cancer cases and 13,502 controls. We used odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the strength of the association. Overall, individuals with the MDR1 3435TT genotype were associated with an increased cancer risk than those with the CC (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10-1.51) or CT/CC (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.04-1.34) genotypes, similar to the CT or CT/TT compared with the CC genotype. In the stratified analyses, the increased risks were more pounced among hematologic malignances (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10-1.46, P (heterogeneity) = 0.415), breast cancer (1.42, 1.04-1.94, 0.018), renal cancer (1.77, 1.28-2.46, 0.307), Caucasians (1.21, 1.07-1.38, 0.000) and population-based studies (1.20, 1.05-1.36, 0.000) in a dominant model. The results suggested that the MDR1 C3435T polymorphism may contribute to cancer risk.     

The CXCL12 G801A polymorphism and cancer risk: Evidence from 17 case‐control studies

CXCL12 has been implicated in human carcinogenesis, but the association between the most-studied G801A polymorphism (rs1801157) and the risk of various cancers was reported with inconclusive results. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the CXCL12 G801A polymorphism and cancer risk. A meta-analysis of 17 studies with 3048 cancer patients and 4522 controls was conducted to evaluate the strength of the association using odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). The overall results showed that the variant genotypes were associated with a significantly increased risk of all cancer types (OR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.18–1.61 for GA versus GG, and OR = 1.36, 95%CI = 1.17–1.59 for GA/AA versus GG). In the stratified analyses, there was a significantly increased risk for the studies of breast cancer (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.16–2.33 for AA versus GG, OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.18–1.71 for GA versus GG, and OR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.21–1.72 for GA/AA versus GG) and lung cancer (OR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.75–4.69 for AA versus GG, OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.20–2.18 for GA vs. GG, OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.36–2.39 for GA/AA versus GG, and OR = 2.24, 95%CI = 1.41–3.57 for AA versus GA/GG), which remained for the studies of Asian populations and hospital-based control sources. Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis indicates that the CXCL12 G801A polymorphism is a low-penetrance risk factor for cancer development.     

Polymorphism of vascular endothelial growth factor −1154G>A (rs1570360) with cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 16 case–control studies

Published data on the association of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) −1154G>A polymorphism with cancer risk is inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of association between VEGF −1154G>A polymorphism and the risk of cancer, we performed a meta-analysis of 7,071 cancer cases and 7,693 controls from 16 published case–control studies. Our meta-analysis didn’t reveal an association between VEGF −1154G>A polymorphism and overall cancer risk (GG vs. AA: OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.96–1.20; GA vs. AA: OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93–1.17; recessive model: GG+GA vs. AA: OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.95–1.18; dominant model: GG vs. GA+AA, OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00–1.24). Nevertheless, for non-Caucasians, GG homozygote may have higher cancer risk compared with either A carriers (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.12–2.23) or AA homozygote (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17–1.76). No significant heterogeneity was detected except in the dominant model and “prostate cancer” subgroup analysis. More studies with larger samples are warranted to confirm these findings.     

Role of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism in cancer risk: Evidence from a meta-analysis of 46 case–control studies

Background

Emerging evidence showed that the common polymorphism (CYP1A2*1F, rs762551 C → A) in the promoter region of the CYP1A2 gene might be associated with susceptibility to cancer in humans. But individually published results were inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate the association between CYP1A2*1F polymorphism and cancer risk.

Methods

The Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese BioMedical databases were searched for all articles published up to September 1st, 2012. Statistical analyses were performed using the STATA 12.0 software.

Results

Forty-six case–control studies were included with a total of 22,993 cancer cases and 28,420 healthy controls. Meta-analysis results showed that the A allele of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism was associated with a decreased cancer risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87–0.98, P = 0.013). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, the A allele of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism may increase the risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.10, P = 0.024), and is also associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54–0.89, P = 0.004). However, similar results were not found in lung, colorectal, bladder, endometrial, pancreatic and gastric cancers. Further subgroup analysis by ethnicity also showed a significant association between the A allele of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism and a decreased cancer risk among Caucasian populations (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84–0.98, P = 0.014); but no significant associations were observed among Asian populations.

Conclusions

Results from the current meta-analysis indicate that the A allele of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism may be associated with breast and ovarian cancer risk, especially among Caucasian populations.     

XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms in colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of case–control studies

The XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms were likely to be involved with the development of colorectal cancer. However, there had been inconsistent reports of association. This meta-analysis of literatures was performed to draw a more precise estimation of the relationship. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for relevant articles with a time limit of December 2012. The strength of association between the XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms and colorectal cancer susceptibility were assessed by odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI). This meta-analysis including six case–control studies evaluated the associations between the two XPC polymorphisms (Lys939Gln, Ala499Val) and colorectal cancer susceptibility. For XPC Lys939Gln, no obvious associations were found for all genetic models [CC vs AA: OR (95 % CI) = 1.12 (0.94–1.32); CA vs AA: OR (95 % CI) = 1.08 (0.94–1.24); the dominant model: OR (95 % CI) = 1.09 (0.97–1.23); the recessive model: OR (95 % CI) = 1.07 (0.92–1.25)]. For XPC Ala499Val, no obvious associations were also not found for all genetic models [TT vs CC: OR (95 % CI) = 0.84 (0.65–1.10); CT vs CC: OR (95 % CI) = 1.00 (0.86–1.15); the dominant model: OR (95 % CI) = 0.98 (0.85–1.12); the recessive model: OR (95 % CI) = 0.87 (0.67–1.12)]. This meta-analysis suggested that both the XPC Lys939Gln and Ala499Val polymorphisms were not risk factors for increasing colorectal cancer.     

Interferon gamma +874 T/A polymorphism contributes to cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 17 case–control studies

Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) plays a pivotal role in antiproliferative, antitumor and antiviral activities. The +874 polymorphism in IFN gene region reportedly affects cancer risk. However, pertinent studies offer conflicting results. To derive a more precise estimation, we performed a meta-analysis based on 1,929 cases and 2,830 controls from 17 published case–control studies, assessing the strength of the association using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Our meta-analysis showed the evidence that IFN-γ +874 T/A was not associated with increased cancer risk in ethnicity and source of controls. However, stratified analysis by cancer type indicated a significantly increased risk of cervical cancer (AT vs. TT: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.02–1.19, P = 0.961 for heterogeneity). Further prospective researches with a larger single study are required to evaluate any association with other types of cancer or in other populations.     

Association between XRCC1 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 23 case–control studies

Several potential functional polymorphisms in the DNA repair gene X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln (rs25487), Arg194Trp (rs1799782), Arg280His (rs25489) and X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) T241M (rs861539) have been implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but the results are conflicting. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of 23 published case control datasets and assessed genetic heterogeneity between those datasets. All the case–control studies published from January 2000 to June 2012 on the association between those polymorphisms and CRC risk were identified by searching the electronic literature Medline. Statistical analysis was performed with the software programs Review Manager (version 4.2). For overall CRC, no significant association was observed, the pooled odds ratios for XRCC1 Arg399Gln, Arg194Trp, Arg280His, and XRCC3 T241M were 1.02 (95 % CI: 0.93, 1.12), 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.94, 1.14), 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.85, 1.13) and 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.85, 1.26), respectively. Furthermore, no significant association was observed in subgroup analyses based on ethnicity. The results suggested that these four SNPs evaluated are not associated with risk of CRC.     

Association between the XRCC3 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis based on case–control studies

The previous published data on the association between X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) T241M, A4541G, and A17893G polymorphisms and breast cancer risk remained controversial. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between breast cancer and XRCC3 T241M (21,910 cases and 23,961 controls), A4541G (9,633 cases and 10,994 controls), and A17893G polymorphisms (10,761 cases and 12,235 controls) in different inheritance models. When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of XRCC3 T241M polymorphism, significantly increased risk of breast cancer was observed in recessive model (odds' ratio [OR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04–1.16) and in additive model (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03–1.16). No significant association was found between A4541G polymorphism and breast cancer risk. When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of XRCC3 A17893G polymorphism, no significant association was found in any genetic model. Additionally, when one study was deleted in the sensitive analysis, the results of XRCC3 A17893G were changed in the additive model (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82–0.99) and dominant model (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89–0.99). In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that T241M polymorphism show an increased breast cancer risk and A17893G polymorphism may be associated with decreased breast cancer risk. A study with the larger sample size is needed to further evaluated gene-environment interaction on XRCC3 T241M, A4541G, and A17893G polymorphisms and breast cancer risk.     

Association between the CYP1A1 T3801C polymorphism and risk of cancer: Evidence from 268 case–control studies

T3801C is a common polymorphism in CYP1A1, showing differences in its biological functions. Case–control studies have been performed to elucidate the role of T3801C in cancer, although the results are conflicting and heterogeneous. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between cancer susceptibility and T3801C (55,963 cases and 76,631 controls from 268 studies) polymorphism in different inheritance models. We used odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to assess the strength of the association. Overall, significantly increased cancer risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09–1.19; recessive model: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12–1.34; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.19–1.45; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07–1.18; additive model: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.09–1.19) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified and sensitivity analyses, the elevated risk remained for subgroups of cervical cancer, head and neck cancer, hepatocellular cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, prostate cancer and breast cancer. In addition, significantly decreased colorectal cancer risk was also observed. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the participation of CYP1A1 T3801C is a genetic susceptibility for some cancer types. Moreover, our work also points out the importance of new studies for T3801C association in some cancer types, such as gallbladder cancer, Asians of acute myeloid leukemia, and thyroid cancer, where at least some of the covariates responsible for heterogeneity could be controlled, to obtain a more conclusive understanding about the function of the CYP1A1 T3801C polymorphism in cancer development.     

Association between the XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and risk of cancer: Evidence from 157 case–control studies

The T241M polymorphism in the X-ray cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) had been implicated in cancer susceptibility. The previous published data on the association between XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and cancer risk remained controversial. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between cancer susceptibility and XRCC3 T241M (61,861 cases and 84,584 controls from 157 studies) polymorphism in different inheritance models. We used odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to assess the strength of the association. Overall, significantly increased cancer risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00–1.13; recessive model: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.08–1.23; additive model: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08–1.28) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified and sensitivity analyses, the elevated risk remained for subgroups of bladder cancer and breast cancer, especially in Caucasians. In addition, significantly decreased lung cancer risk was also observed. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests the participation of XRCC3 T241M in the susceptibility for bladder cancer and breast cancer, especially in Caucasians, and XRCC3 T241M polymorphism is associated with decreased lung cancer risk. Moreover, our work also points out the importance of new studies for T241M association in some cancer types, such as gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and melanoma skin cancer, where at least some of the covariates responsible for heterogeneity could be controlled, to obtain a more conclusive understanding about the function of the XRCC3 polymorphism in cancer development.     

P53 polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility: a pooled analysis of 32 case–control studies

To explore the real association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism and lung cancer risk, a pooled analysis of 32 case–control studies involving 19,255 subjects was conducted. When all 32 studies were pooled into the analysis, significantly elevated lung cancer risks were associated with variant genotypes in all genetic models (for Pro/Arg vs. Arg/Arg: OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.23; for Pro/Pro vs. Arg/Arg: OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03–1.39; for Pro/Pro + Pro/Arg vs. Arg/Arg: OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.25; for Pro/Pro vs. Arg/Arg + Pro/Arg: OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01–1.12). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, histological type, or smoking status, significantly increased risks were found in subgroups such as Asians, Caucasians, lung adenocarcinoma patients, or smokers, respectively. In conclusion, our results suggest that the Pro allele at p53 codon 72 is emerging as a low-penetrance susceptibility allele for lung cancer development.     

XRCC1 gene polymorphisms and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of 44 case–control studies

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 gene (XRCC1) has been implicated in risk for lung cancer. However, the results from different studies remain controversial. In this meta-analysis, we have assessed 44 published case-control studies regarding associations of lung cancer risk with three common polymorphisms, codon 194, codon 280 and codon 399, and -77 T?>?C in the promoter region of XRCC1. The results in total population showed that the risk for lung cancer was increased among the variant homozygote Trp/Trp of codon 194 polymorphism, compared with the wild type Arg/Arg (OR: 1.19; 95?% CI 1.01-1.39), and the variant genotype CC of -77 T?>?C polymorphism showed a significantly increased risk of developing lung cancer, compared to wild-type genotype TT (OR: 1.91; 95?% CI 1.24-2.94). However, no associations were found between lung cancer risk and codon 280, codon 399. In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, the OR for the variant homozygote Trp/Trp of codon 194 was 1.21(95?% CI 1.02-1.43) for Asian. When stratified by source of control, we found a protective effect of codon 194 Arg/Trp genotype (OR: 0.87; 95?% CI 0.77-0.98) and risk effect of codon 399 combined Arg/Gln?+?Gln/Gln variant genotype (OR: 1.09; 95?% CI 1.01-1.18) for lung cancer on the basis of hospital control. Subgroup analyses by histological types of lung cancer indicated that the heterozygote Arg/Trp in codon 194 could decrease and the combined variant genotype Arg/Gln?+?Gln/Gln in codon 399 could increase the risk of non-small cell lung cancer (OR: 0.69; 95?% CI 0.57-0.85 and OR: 1.14; 95?% CI 1.04-1.24). In conclusion, this meta-analysis has demonstrated that codon 194, codon 399 and -77 T?>?C polymorphisms of XRCC1 gene might have contributed to individual susceptibility to lung cancer. To further evaluate effect of XRCC1 polymorphisms, gene-gene interaction and gene-environment interaction on lung cancer risk, a single large sample size study with thousands of subjects is required to get conclusive results.     

Family history of cancer and the risk of bladder cancer: A case–control study from Italy

BackgroundA family history of bladder cancer has been associated with the risk of bladder cancer, but quantification of the excess risk in different populations is still a relevant issue. Further, the role of a family history of other cancers on the risk of bladder cancer remains unclear.MethodsWe analyzed data from an Italian case–control study, including 690 bladder cancer cases and 665 hospital controls. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated through unconditional logistic regression models, adjusted for sex, age, study center, year of interview and further for education, smoking and sibling’s number.ResultsThe OR for family history of bladder cancer was 2.13 (95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) 1.02–4.49) from the model with partial adjustment, and 1.99 (95%CI 0.91–4.32) after additional adjustment for smoking and siblings’ number, based on 23 cases (3.3%) and 11 controls (1.7%) with a family history of bladder cancer. The fully adjusted OR was 3.77 when the relative was diagnosed at age below 65 years. Smokers with a family history of bladder cancer had a four-fold increased risk compared to non-smokers without a family history. Bladder cancer risk was significantly increased among subjects with a family history of hemolymphopoietic cancers (OR = 2.97, 95%CI 1.35–6.55). Family history of cancer at other sites showed no significant association with bladder cancer risk.ConclusionThis study confirms an approximately two-fold increased risk of bladder cancer for family history of bladder cancer, and indicates a possible familial clustering of bladder cancer with cancers of the hemolymphopoietic system.     

DNMT3B polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta analysis of 24 case–control studies

The association between polymorphism of DNA methyltransferases 3B and cancer risk has been widely studied recently, and no consensus conclusion is available up to now. We perform a comprehensive search using the databases of Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge and Embase. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) are used to investigate the strength of the association. A total of 24 case–control studies with 15,647 individuals are included in this meta-analysis. For −149C > T (17 studies, 5229 cases and 6910 controls), no evidence indicate that individuals carrying the variant genotypes (CC + CT), relative to those carrying the wild homozygote TT genotype, have an increased risk of cancer (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.84–1.26; P = 0.76). Similarly, no cancer risk is found in the subgroup analyses. For −579G > T (11 studies, 3513 cases and 3714 controls), significantly decreased risks of cancer are observed, and the ORs (95% CI) are 0.70 (0.56–0.87) for GT versus TT, 0.70 (0.57–0.85) for GG + GT versus TT and 0.76 (0.63–0.93) for G-allele versus T-allele, respectively. Subgroup analyses stratified by ethnicity and types of cancer are also performed, and results indicated that −579G > C polymorphism is associated with risk of cancer in Asians [0.68 (0.53–0.87) for GT vs. TT] but not in Europeans [0.82 (0.63–1.07) for GT vs. TT]. We also observe that the −579G is associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer [0.49(0.38–0.62) for GT vs. TT]. More studies with larger sample size were needed to provide more precise evidence.