CA 72-4 compared with CEA and CA 19-9 as a marker of some gastrointestinal malignancies

The objective of this study was to compare CA 72-4 with CEA and CA 19-9 in gastrointestinal malignancies. CA 72-4 was assayed by radioimmunoassay and CEA and CA 19-9 with the Abbott IMx analyser. The study included 52 patients with gastrointestinal cancer and 20 controls with benign gastrointestinal diseases. The 52 cases showed marker sensitivities of 39%, 49% and 35% for CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9, respectively, and 64% when the markers were combined. Marker expression in serum was highest in colorectal carcinoma followed by gastric and esophageal carcinoma. The sensitivities of the individual markers in colorectal, gastric and esophageal carcinomas, respectively, were: CA 72-4, 56%, 32% and 18%; CEA, 83%, 33% and 18%; CA 19-9, 53%, 25% and 18%. The sensitivity of the three markers in combination was 89%, 50% and 46% in colorectal, gastric and esophageal cancer, respectively. The specificity of CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9 was 100%, 72% and 86%, respectively. However, CA 72-4 is not a useful a marker for gastrointestinal cancers because of its poor sensitivity. CEA, which had the best overall sensitivity and a reasonable specificity, was the most useful single marker, especially for colorectal cancer. Whereas the single markers were not useful in gastric and esophageal cancer, the combination of the three may be.     

Tumor markers (CEA, TPA and CA 19-9) in urine of bladder cancer patients

This study was carried out to evaluate the usefulness of determining urinary levels of carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA), tissue-polypeptide antigen (TPA), and gastro-intestinal cancer antigen (Ca19-9) in addition to the usual diagnostic procedures for bladder cancer. Sixty-seven patients with transitional bladder cancer, 40 healthy controls and 20 patients with inflammatory diseases of the urinary tract were considered. All urine samples were obtained from patients with intact renal function and no urinary tract infection. TPA and Ca19-9 urinary levels in patients with G3 bladder tumors were significantly higher than in those with lower graded neoplasms. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a positive (PV+) or negative (PV-) test and the diagnostic accuracy were also evaluated. Ca19-9 was the best urinary marker for bladder cancer (sensitivity 71.6%, specificity 91.6%, PV+ 90.5%, PV- 74.3%, diagnostic accuracy 81%).     

Arginase as a useful factor for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases

The present work is a continuation of studies on arginase as a marker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). The purpose of the study was the evaluation of the arginase test in comparison with other colorectal cancer tests such as CEA, CA 19-9 and biochemical markers of liver function such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The studies were conducted on blood serum from 85 patients with CRCLM obtained one to two days before tumor resection. The control group comprised 140 healthy blood donors and 81 patients with various non-malignant gastrointestinal diseases. Raised arginase activity was observed in serum of 85% of CRCLM patients, whereas elevated levels of CEA and CA 19-9 were found in 63% and 42% of patients, respectively. The combination of CEA or CA 19-9 with the arginase assay improved their sensitivity, but the sensitivity of the combined parameters was not higher than that of the arginase test itself. AST and ALT activities were increased in about 30% of CRCLM patients. The specificity of the arginase test calculated for 221 control subjects was 76%. It can thus be concluded that the determination of serum arginase activity can be helpful in the diagnosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.     

Irisin and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers in Gastric and Colorectal Cancers

Background:Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a common gastrointestinal tumor biomarker. Irisin is adipo-myokines that has been suggested to have a potential role in cancer development. However, limited studies test irisin as biomarker in gastric and colorectal cancers. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether CEA and irisin could be a potential diagnostic biomarker in gastric and colorectal cancer.Methods:A case-control study consists of 90 subjects, 21 gastric cancer patients, 49 colorectal cancer patients and 20 control. Serum CEA was detected by fluorescence immunoassay (FIA) kit. Serum irisin was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit.Results:Serum CEA increases significantly and serum irisin decreases significantly in gastric and colorectal cancer patients. According to Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, in gastric cancer, the area under curve of CEA is 1.00 (95% CI, 1.000-1.000, p< 0.0001). The diagnostic cut-off of CEA is< 3.08 ng/ml with %100 sensitivity and 100% specificity. The area under curve of irisin is 0.94 (95% CI, 0.8177-1.000, p< 0.0001). The cut-off of irisin is> 30.2 ng/ml with %90 sensitivity and 100%, specificity. In colorectal cancer, the area under curve of CEA is 0.99 (95% CI, 0.9866-1.000, p< 0.0001) and the diagnostic value< 2.6 ng/ml with %98 sensitivity and %100 specificity. The area under curve of irisin is 0.96 (95% CI, 0.9155-1.000, p< 0.0001). The diagnostic cut-off of irisin is> 41.9 ng/ml with 88.1sensitivity and 90.5 specificity.Conclusion:CEA and irisin could be powerful potential diagnostic biomarkers which would be use for early detection of gastric and colorectal cancers.Key Words: Biomarker, Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Colorectal cancer, Gastric cancer, Irisin     

AFP, CEA, CA 19-9 and TPA in hepatocellular carcinoma.

The present study is based on the assay of four markers (AFP, CEA, TPA, Ca 19-9) using IRMA methods in 36 normal subjects, 44 cirrhosis and 66 HCC patients. Parametric and non parametric tests were used to test differences and correlations. ROC curves and discriminant functions were also elaborated. Normal 95% "cut-off" was determined by the "boostrap" method yielding: CEA 3.4 ng/ml; Ca 19-9 55 U/ml; TPA 58U/l and AFP 5.2 ng/ml. In HCC patients the values of the four markers were, on average, significantly different from those of normal subjects. However, only AFP and TPA exhibited high diagnostic accuracy (90%) for detection of the tumor. Higher than normal mean values for all markers were, also observed in cirrhotic patients. Only AFP yielded effective discrimination between HCC and cirrhosis. The positive prediction for the presence of the tumor on cirrhotic ground was 95% for AFP values higher than 18.5 ng/ml, with a 78% negative predictive value with a 6 ng/ml threshold. Association of AFP with TPA showed only a marginal diagnostic improvement. Results were not improved at all by combining CEA and Ca 19-9 with AFP and/or TPA. In conclusion, AFP is and remains the best marker for HCC and the only one effective in discriminating of HCC from cirrhosis. TPA may be considered a valid alternative if cirrhosis is not present. CEA and Ca19-9 are of no use.     

CEA、CA19-9与CA72-4用于诊断老年胃癌的临床价值研究

目的:探讨CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4诊断老年胃癌的临床价值。方法:对192例经活检确诊为老年胃癌患者的血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4水平进行分析,比较不同TNM分期老年胃癌患者的血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4阳性率,并评价血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4水平诊断老年胃癌的敏感性和特异性。结果:TNM 3期及4期的胃癌患者CEA以及CA19-9阳性率明显高于1期及2期胃癌患者,而TNM1-4期的胃癌患者CA72-4的阳性率都明显高于CEA以及CA19-9。以6.5 ng/m L、30U/m L以及4 ng/m L分别作为CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4的上限临界值,其诊断老年患者的胃癌的敏感性分别为15.6%、19.3%以及29.2%,特异性分别为98.9%、97.2%以及98.0%,曲线下面积分别为0.59、0.62以及0.66。结论:CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4对于诊断老年胃癌都有较好的特异性,但敏感性一般,尤其对于早期胃癌,CEA及CA19-9敏感性较差,CA72-4敏感性要优于二者。     

Significance of CA72.4 in patients with colorectal cancer. Comparison with CEA and CA19.9.

CA72.4 is a new tumor-associated antigen identified by monoclonal antibodies cc49 and B72.3. Serum levels of CA72.4 were measured in patients with benign and malignant diseases. The cut-off used was 4 U/mL. CA72.4 is a highly specific marker since only 3% of 162 patients with benign diseases had elevated levels of antigen. Forty-four percent of 89 patients with colorectal cancer had elevated CA72.4 levels. Compared with CEA and CA19.9, we have found that CEA (75%) is the most sensitive marker (p less than 0.001). The simultaneous use of two or three markers did not further contribute to the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer.     

The significance of CA19-9 tumor antigen in the serum of patients with carcinomas

The concentration of serum CA19-9TM in 101 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), and 109 patients with carcinomas of lung, breast, stomach and pancreas and hepatoma, and 40 normal healthy controls including an equal number of smokers and nonsmokers were determined by solid phase radioimmunoassay of CA19-9 assay kits (Centocor). Of the normal sera, only 1 out of 40 (2.5%) was over 37.6 U/ml. No significant difference of CA19-9 levels was found between smokers (14.4 +/- 9.0 U/ml) and non-smokers (16.0 +/- 10.2 U/ml) of normal control. In patients sera, the mean value of CA19-9 levels was significantly higher in patients with Dukes B (P less than 0.05) and in patients with Dukes C and D (P less than 0.001) than the normal healthy control (15.2 +/- 10.2 U/ml). Analysis of serum CEA concentrations has shown a similar result in patients with all Dukes staged CRC. The CA19-9 levels was also significantly elevated in patients with gastric carcinoma, lung carcinoma, hepatoma, and especially in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (P less than 0.0001). The levels of CA19-9 elevated in 50% (22/44) of patients with advanced CRC while the elevation was 8 of 43 (18.6%) patients with localized CRC. A comparison of CA19-9 and CEA assays showed no correlation (r = 0.125) between the two assays. Although the CA19-9 assay (26.4%) was less sensitive than the CEA assay (51.7%), the specificity of CA19-9 assay (97.5%) was better than that of CEA assay (87.5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The value of CEA and CA 19-9 in detecting cancer in a group of high-risk subjects with gastrointestinal symptoms

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of CEA and CA 19-9 in a potential high-risk population of subjects with gastrointestinal complaints. The basic question was whether the determination of these markers, in addition to some other clinical features in this high risk population, could be helpful in diagnosing intraabdominal cancer. Two hundred and two patients with gastrointestinal complaints underwent standard diagnostic procedures and were followed for at least one year. For every patient, CEA and CA 19-9 levels were obtained at the first examination; the evaluating physician was blinded to the marker levels. The determinants of the likelihood of cancer were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Seventeen patients were diagnosed as having intraabdominal cancers. With the presence of melena (RR = 101.63, p = 0.007), nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms (RR = 12.54, p = 0.026), increasing age (RR = 1.09, p = 0.028) and abnormal CEA (RR = 240.79, p = 0.000), the risk of having cancer increased significantly and independently. The presence of a primary gastric complaint was associated with a lower risk of cancer in this cohort (RR = 0.01, p = 0.04). Markers were not used in the diagnostic workup. In conclusion, in patients presenting with gastrointestinal complaints, the finding of elevated CEA levels may help in the diagnosis of cancer by prompting a more extensive search for intraabdominal cancer.     

血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断价值分析

摘要 目的：探讨与分析血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断价值。方法：2019年8月到2022年5月选择在本院诊治的消化道恶性肿瘤患者150例作为消化道恶性肿瘤组,同期选择在本院体检的健康人群150例作为健康组。采集两组人群的血清癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原19-9（CA19-9）、C-反应蛋白（CRP）含量,调查患者的病理特征并判断诊断价值。结果：消化道恶性肿瘤组的血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量都高于健康组（P<0.05）。消化道恶性肿瘤组的CEA、CA19-9、CRP阳性率为54.7 %、58.7 %、60.7 %,高于健康组的3.3 %、4.0 %、4.7 %（P<0.05）。在消化道恶性肿瘤组中,不同组织学分化、临床分期、淋巴结转移患者的血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量对比有差异（P<0.05）。血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP诊断为阳性113例,在健康组中诊断为阳性3例,血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性与特异性分别为75.3 %（113/150）和98.0 %（147/150）。结论：消化道恶性肿瘤患者多伴随有血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP的高表达,病理特征与血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量存在相关性,血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性与特异性都比较好。     

Reference levels of the tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen, the carbohydrate antigens 19-9 and 72-4, and cytokeratin fragment 19 using the Elecsys Relecsys 1010 analyzer in a normal population in Kuwait. The importance of the determination of local reference levels

The tumor markers CEA, CA 19-9, CA 72-4 and CYFRA 21-1 were analyzed in a group of apparently healthy subjects (n=232) in Kuwait using the Elecsys Relecsys 1010 analyzer. The distribution of the tumour marker levels was analyzed separately in Kuwaitis (n=103), non-Kuwaitis (n=129), smokers (n=68), non-smokers (n=164), males (n=138) and females (n=94). The distribution of CEA was significantly different in Kuwaitis vs. non-Kuwaitis in the total population (p=0.033) and in non-smokers (p=0.049); in males vs. females in the total population (p<0.0001) and in non-smokers (p=0.0002); and in smokers vs. non-smokers in the total population (p<0.0001) using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. None of the other tumour markers showed significant differences in the subgroups. The upper reference level was defined as the 95th percentile of the normal values in each group. A higher reference level of CEA was observed in smokers (vs. non-smokers) in the total population. Also higher reference levels of CEA were observed in males (vs. females) both in the total population and in non-smokers. In the total population the respective reference levels were: CEA: 4.4 microg/L, CA 19-9: 35 kU/L, CA 72.4: 2.4 kU/L, and CYFRA 21.1: 2.1 microg/L. These results were compared with data in the kit inserts and literature data. The impact of 95th percentiles in a local heterogeneous population is discussed.     

Granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with colorectal cancer

Granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) belongs to the group of glycoproteins called colony-stimulating factors (CSFs). It has been shown that the activity of CSFs is not limited to the hematopoietic cells but can also affect the proliferation of colon carcinoma cell lines. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the serum level of GM-CSF in colorectal cancer patients to a control group, to assess the level of GM-CSF in relation to the level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and to define the sensitivity, the specificity and the predictive values of GM-CSF in colorectal cancer. In this study, the serum level of tumour markers was measured in 30 patients with colorectal cancer and in 20 healthy subjects. GM-CSF was assayed using ELISA system, CEA and CA 19-9 were measured by MEIA. The serum levels of CEA, CA 19-9 and GM-CSF were higher in the patients with colorectal cancer than in the control group. The sensitivities of CEA (63%) and CA 19-9 (56%) were lower than the GM-CSF sensitivity (80%). The specificities of tumour markers were 70% (CEA, GM-CSF) and 75% for CA 19-9. The GM-CSF predictive v values were higher than the CEA and CA 19-9 values. These results suggest that GM-CSF may be useful as tumour marker in colorectal cancer, but further studies are needed.     

Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a comparative clinical study between CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 50

Seventy-eight patients were evaluated to ascertain the usefulness of markers CA 19-9 and CA 50 in diagnosing pancreatic cancer, using a less specific marker (CEA) as reference. Three groups were considered: a) 36 controls; b) 22 patients with benign obstructive jaundice; c) 20 patients with pancreatic cancer. Preoperative blood samples were obtained to ascertain CEA (E.I.A.), CA 19-9 (R.I.A.) and CA 50 (T.R.-F.I.A.). Serum concentrations of the various markers were significantly higher for patients with pancreatic cancer in comparison with the other groups, at cut-offs of 10 ng/ml (CEA), 100 ng/ml (CA 19-9) and 170 U/ml (CA 50). The sensitivity of CA 19-9 (94%) and CA 50 (88%) was much greater than that of CEA (30%). The specificity of the three markers in patients with pancreatic cancer, with respect to the control group, was 100% and this figure is reduced with respect to the group suffering from benign obstructive jaundice (CEA: 90%; CA 19-9: 88% and CA 50: 87%). Diagnostic results (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (P.P.V.) and negative predictive value (N.P.V.] did not significantly increase with respect to CA 19-9 and CA 50 when considered individually. It is concluded that the serum concentrations of CA 19-9 and CA 50 showed high sensitivity and specificity as markers of pancreatic cancer with respect to the other groups, pointing towards clinical routine clinical use of both markers. In addition, a comparative study of the literature has been made and prospects for short-term development and concrete applications for early and reliable diagnosis have been highlighted.     

Diagnostic significance of serum HMGB1 in colorectal carcinomas

High mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), a nuclear protein, can be translocated to the cytoplasm and secreted in colon cancer cells. However, the diagnostic significance of HMGB1 has not been evaluated in colorectal carcinomas. For this purpose, we have screened the expression and secretion of HMGB1 in 10 colon cancer cell lines and 1 control cell line and found that HMGB1 was detected in the culture medium. To evaluate the diagnostic value of HMGB1, we performed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure HMGB1 levels and compared them to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in the serum samples of 219 colorectal carcinoma patients and 75 healthy control subjects. We found that the serum HMGB1 level was increased by 1.5-fold in patients with colorectal carcinoma compared to those in healthy controls. When HMGB1 and CEA levels were compared, HMGB1 had similar efficacy as CEA regarding cancer detection (the sensitivity was 20.1% for HMGB1 vs. 25.6% for CEA, and the specificity was 96% for HMGB1 vs. 90.7% for CEA). Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of HMGB1 for stage I cancer was significantly higher than that of CEA (sensitivity: 41.2% vs. 5.9%; specificity: 96% vs. 90.7). When we combined HMGB1 and CEA, the overall diagnostic sensitivity was higher than that of CEA alone (42% vs. 25.6%), and the diagnostic sensitivity for stage I was also elevated (47% vs. 5.9%). However, the prognosis of patients was not related with serum HMGB1 concentrations. Our findings indicate that serum HMGB1 levels are increased in a subset of colorectal carcinomas, suggesting their potential utility as a supportive diagnostic marker for colorectal carcinomas.     

Comparative analysis of CEA and SCC serum markers with IAP in human lung cancer

Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) and immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP) were measured in 37 patients with lung cancers, in 24 with non-cancer pulmonary diseases and in 24 normal controls We evaluated the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of these three markers alone and combined. The highest specificity was observed for SCC (83.3%) and the highest sensitivity for IAP (94.6%). The best accuracy was obtained with the combined determination of CEA and SCC. In cancer and non-cancer pulmonary diseases the best correlation was observed between CEA and SCC (r = 0.30 in cancer and r = 0.45 in non-cancer pulmonary diseases). Although the IAP test is not specific in the detection of lung cancer, its use may be helpful in monitoring the acute phase reactions that occur very frequently in this malignancy.     

Carcinoembryonic antigen in effusions. A diagnostic adjunct to cytology

A total of 189 effusion specimens (100 benign and 89 malignant) submitted for cytologic examination were assayed for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) by an enzyme immunoassay to determine whether the addition of CEA evaluation to cytologic study would improve the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of malignancy. The sensitivity and specificity were 78% and 90%, respectively, for a cytologic diagnosis of malignancy and 68% and 99%, respectively, for a positive CEA (greater than 5 ng/mL). CEA assay was negative in the most common epithelial malignancies of the female genital tract (15 of 17 cases), mesotheliomas (5), lymphomas (7) and alveolar-cell carcinoma of lung (1). CEA assay was positive in 55 of 89 cases of malignancy, including 14 cases with cytologically negative malignant effusions. The CEA assay sensitivity for lung carcinoma (95% for adenocarcinoma, 100% for oat-cell carcinoma and 100% for carcinosarcoma), breast carcinoma (95%), and gastrointestinal carcinoma (100%) were all over 90%. No significant difference in the levels of CEA was noted between gastrointestinal and lung adenocarcinomas. Oat-cell carcinomas and squamous-cell carcinomas had lower values. In cases of an effusion with an unknown primary, an elevated CEA in the fluid is diagnostic of metastatic carcinoma arising from the breast, lung or gastrointestinal tract.     

MN/CA9: a potential gene marker for detection of malignant cells in effusions.

Many cancers cause malignant effusions. The presence of malignant cells in effusions has implications in diagnosis, tumour staging and prognosis. The detection of malignant cells currently presents a challenge for cytopathologists. New adjunctive methods are needed. Although the effusions provide excellent materials for molecular assay, the available molecular markers are extremely limited, which hinders its clinical application. MN/CA9 has proved to be a valuable marker in many cancers such as lung, breast, colon, kidney, etc. The present study was to evaluate MN/CA9 as a new molecular marker for the detection of cancer cells in pleural effusions. Seventy-one pleural effusions including 59 malignant effusions from patients with cancer, and 12 patients with benign diseases as a control, were subjected to RT-PCR for detection of MN/CA9 gene expression. MN/CA9 gene expression was detected in 53/59 (89.8%) pleural effusions from cancer patients (15/16 for breast cancers, 10/11 for lung cancers, 4/4 for ovary cancers, 2/3 for colon-rectal cancers, 5/6 for cancers of unknown site, 7/8 for mesothelioma and 10/11 for other cancers). Furthermore, MN/CA9 was positive in 13/18 (72.2%) of cytologically negative effusions of cancer patients. MN/CA9 was detected in only 1/12 (8.3%) effusions from the control patients (p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of MN/CA9 gene expression were, respectively, 89.8% and 91.7%. Our preliminary results suggest that MN/CA9 could be a potential marker for the detection of malignant cells in effusions. A large-scale study is needed to confirm these results.     

MN/CA9: a potential gene marker for detection of malignant cells in effusions

Many cancers cause malignant effusions. The presence of malignant cells in effusions has implications in diagnosis, tumour staging and prognosis. The detection of malignant cells currently presents a challenge for cytopathologists. New adjunctive methods are needed. Although the effusions provide excellent materials for molecular assay, the available molecular markers are extremely limited, which hinders its clinical application. MN/CA9 has proved to be a valuable marker in many cancers such as lung, breast, colon, kidney, etc. The present study was to evaluate MN/CA9 as a new molecular marker for the detection of cancer cells in pleural effusions. Seventy-one pleural effusions including 59 malignant effusions from patients with cancer, and 12 patients with benign diseases as a control, were subjected to RT-PCR for detection of MN/CA9 gene expression. MN/CA9 gene expression was detected in 53/59 (89.8%) pleural effusions from cancer patients (15/16 for breast cancers, 10/11 for lung cancers, 4/4 for ovary cancers, 2/3 for colon–rectal cancers, 5/6 for cancers of unknown site, 7/8 for mesothelioma and 10/11 for other cancers). Furthermore, MN/CA9 was positive in 13/18 (72.2%) of cytologically negative effusions of cancer patients. MN/CA9 was detected in only 1/12 (8.3%) effusions from the control patients (p<0.01). The sensitivity and specificity of MN/CA9 gene expression were, respectively, 89.8% and 91.7%. Our preliminary results suggest that MN/CA9 could be a potential marker for the detection of malignant cells in effusions. A large-scale study is needed to confirm these results.     

Diagnostic value of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor as a tumor marker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

We assessed the diagnostic value of circulating VEGF as a tumor marker in patients with lung cancer and compared its clinical utility with that of other markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA). One hundred and sixty non-small cell lung cancer patients and 70 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Circulating VEGF was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The serum concentrations of both CEA and CYFRA were measured by means of immunoradiometric assays. The diagnostic value of plasma VEGF (VEGFp) was better than that of CYFRA and similar to that of CEA. When the diagnostic value of VEGFp and CEA for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was compared, the two markers proved to have nearly equal discriminatory power. In diagnosing squamous cell carcinoma, VEGFp showed less discrimination than CYFRA. When the diagnostic value of VEGFp was analyzed for stage I adenocarcinoma patients, VEGFp was slightly more discriminatory than CEA. The combination assay of VEGFp and CEA had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 60% at a cutoff of 104.4 pg/mL for VEGFp and 5.2 ng/mL for CEA. The combination of VEGF and CEA was superior to CEA alone in the early diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the lung.