Behavioral evidence of a latency code for stimulus intensity in mormyrid electric fish

Mormryid electric fish (Gnathonemus petersii) respond to novel stimuli with an increase in the rate of the electric organ discharge (EOD). These novelty responses were used to measure the fish's ability to detect small changes in the amplitude and latency of an electrosensory stimulus. Responses were evoked in curarized fish in which the EOD was blocked but in which the EOD motor command continued to be emitted. An artificial EOD was provided to the fish at latencies of 2.4 to 14.4 ms following the EOD motor command.Novelty responses were evoked in response to transient changes in artificial EOD amplitude as small as 1% of baseline amplitude, and in latency as small as 0.1 ms. Changes in latency were effective only at baseline delays of less than 12.4 ms.The sensitivity to small changes in latency supports the hypothesis that latency is used as a code for stimulus intensity in the active electrolocation system of mormyrid fish. The results also indicate that a corollary discharge signal associated with the EOD motor command is used to measure latency.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - epsp excitatory post synaptic potential     

Electrosensory modulation of escape responses

Once initiated, rapid escape responses of teleost fishes are thought to be completed without additional sensory modification. This suggests that the motor program for a particular response is selected for by the constellation of sensory cues existing at the time of the releasing stimulus. This paper presents initial evidence that a highly specialized, phylogenetically recent electrosensory system is integrated with a primitive motor system and allows an animal to continuously monitor its environment for producing accurate escape behaviors.Behavioral testing for directed startle responses in a Y-maze demonstrates that when presented immediately before an acoustic startle stimulus, electric fish (Eigenmannia virescens), direct their response away from the cue (a transient shorting of their electric field). Thus, electrosensory cues as brief as 100 ms provide directional information to the escape motor network.In electric fish that are curarized to facilitate intracellular recording, the normal electric organ discharge is attenuated. When an electronically generated replacement field of the same frequency and amplitude as the fish's normal signal is shorted, a fast-rising, 7 ms latency post-synaptic potential is evoked from the Mauthner cell. Similar PSPs are generated by turning the replacement stimulus on and off. In some recordings, removing the S1 replacement field elicits a rebound of other afferent activity to the Mauthner cell; replacing the field suppresses this activity.Abbreviations EHP extrinsic hyperpolarizing potential - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jaming avoidance response - LED light emitting diode - PSP postsynaptic potential     

Gain control in the electrosensory system: a role for the descending projections to the electrosensory lateral line lobe

The responses of E-cells, basilar pyramidal cells, of the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELLL) were studied in normal animals (Apteronotus leptorhynchus) and in fish in which a component of the descending input from the midbrain n. praeeminentialis to the ELLL was interrupted by lesions or by application of local anesthetics. This treatment increased the responsiveness of these neurons by 100 to 300%. A method is described by which the animal's electric organ discharge (EOD) can be increased or decreased in amplitude. Responses of E-cells to a brief stationary electrosensory stimulus and to moving electrolocation targets were studied in normal and in lesioned animals with normal and altered EOD amplitudes. Large reductions in EOD amplitude, approximately 50%, result in no significant changes in the average size of E-cells' responses to either type of electrosensory stimulus in normal animals. Interruption of the descending input, however, results in a loss of the E-cells' ability to maintain constant response size when the EOD amplitude is reduced. Increases in EOD amplitude cause reductions in the size of E-cell responses to the moving electrolocation targets and to the stationary stimulus. The effects of increased EOD amplitude are present in normal animals and in animals in which the descending input is interrupted. The descending input to the ELLL seems to function as a gain control mechanism that is capable of compensating for losses in stimulus strength resulting from reduced EOD amplitude. The component of the descending input studied here does not seem to play a role in the response of the system to increases in EOD amplitude. These results are discussed in conjunction with the known details of the ELLL circuitry and its connections with other brain areas.     

Electrosensory phase sensitivity in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia in the detection of signals similar to its own

The electric organ discharge (EOD) of the South American knifefish Eigenmannia sp. is a permanently present wave signal of usually constant amplitude and frequency (similar to a sine wave). A fish perceives discharges of other fish as a modulation of its own. At frequency identity (F = 0 Hz) the phase difference between a fish's own electric discharge and that of another fish affects the superimposed waveform. It was unclear whether or not the electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold as behaviourally determined depends on the phase difference between a fish's own EOD and a sine-wave stimulus (at F = 0 Hz). Also the strength of the jamming avoidance response (JAR), a discharge frequency shift away from a stimulus that is sufficiently close to the EOD frequency, as a function of phase difference was studied. Sine-wave stimuli were both frequency-clamped and phase-locked to a fish's discharge frequency (F = 0 Hz). In food-rewarded fish, the electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold depended significantly on the phase difference between a fish's discharge and the stimulus. Stimulus-intensity thresholds were low (down to 3 V/cm, peak-to-peak) when the superimposed complex wave changed such that the shift in zero-crossings times relative to the original EOD was large but amplitude change minimal; stimulus-intensity thresholds were high (up to 16.9 V/cm, peak-to-peak) when the shift in zero-crossings times was small but amplitude change maximal. Similar results were obtained for the non-conditioned JAR: at constant supra-threshold stimulus intensities and F = 0 Hz, the phase difference significantly affected the strength of the JAR, although variability between individuals was higher than that observed in the conditioned experiments.Abbreviations ACP active phase coupling - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response - F frequency (fish) — frequency (stimulus) [Hz] - p-p peak-to-peak     

An internal current source yields immunity of electrosensory information processing to unusually strong jamming in electric fish

Summary The electric organ of a fish represents an internal current source, and the largely isopotential nature of the body interior warrants that the current associated with the fish's electric organ discharges (EODs) recruits all electroreceptors on the fish's body surface evenly. Currents associated with the EODs of a neighbor, however, will not penetrate all portions of the fish's body surface equally and will barely affect regions where the neighbor's current flows tangentially to the skin surface. The computational mechanisms of the jamming avoidance response (JAR) in Eigenmannia exploit the uneven effects of a neighbor's EOD current to calculate the correct frequency difference between the two interfering EOD signals even if the amplitude of a neighbor's signal surpasses that of the fish's own signal by orders of magnitude. The particular geometry of the fish's own EOD current thus yields some immunity against the potentially confusing effects of unusually strong interfering EOD currents of neighbors.Abbreviations DF frequency difference - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response     

Communication in the weakly electric fish Sternopygus macrurus

Summary A classical conditioning paradigm was used to test the ability of Sternopygus macrurus to detect EOD-like stimuli (sine waves) of different frequencies. The behavioral tuning curves were quite close in shape to tuning curves based on single-unit recordings of T units, although the sensitivity at all frequencies was much greater. The behavioral curves showed notches of greatly reduced sensitivity when the test frequency was equal to, or twice the EOD frequency. The EOD of each of the fish was eliminated by lesioning the medullary pacemaker nucleus, and the fish were retested. The resulting tuning curves were nearly the same in shape as those of the EOD-intact individuals, but the PMN-lesioned fish showed an overall reduction of sensitivity of 30 dB. The EOD appears to enhance sensitivity by placing the summed stimulus (test stimulus + fish's EOD) at an amplitude where T units are maximally sensitive to small temporal modulations in the fish's own EOD. Peripheral tuning appears to limit the ability of males to detect the EOD of females, since these are, on average, an octave higher in frequency than the male EOD, while the peak sensitivity of the male occurs 5–10 Hz above its own EOD frequency.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - PMN pacemaker nucleus - BF best frequency - DF difference frequency     

Electrosensory systems in the mormyrid fish, Gnathonemus petersii : special emphasis on the fast conducting pathway

1. Rhombencephalic and mesencephalic structures involved in electroreception were investigated by electrophysiological methods in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. 2. The existence of a synchronous response to electric field stimulation of the fish in the mesencephalic exterolateral nucleus (n.ext.-lat.mes) with 2.5-3 ms latency was confirmed. The lateral line lobe nucleus (nLLL) is identified as the rhombencephalic relay for the mesencephalic responses because of the short latency synchronous response in the nLLL obtained by threshold stimulation of the posterior lateral line nerve. Responses in both the nLLL and the n.ext.-lat.mes. appear and their amplitudes increase simultaneously with increasing stimulus intensity. 3. Comparison of latencies supports a three-neuron pathway hypothesis which also agrees well with the various functional properties described. 4. The nLLL-n.ext.-lat.mes. pathway is blocked sharply for a period of 1 ms occurring 3 ms after the electric organ discharge (EOD). This inhibitory period is phase-related to the Mesencephalic Command Associated Signal (MCAS) of Aljure (1946) ; The phase relation is such that no response is observed to the fish's own EOD. 5. Long-lasting responses of 10-12 ms duration to higher stimulation intensities were obtained in the ganglionic layer of the lateral line lobe (LLL). Intensities evoking maximal responses in the nLLL and n.ext.lat.mes. are still threshold stimulation for lateral line lobe responses. 6. Long-lasting responses (of the same order as in the LLL) to the fish' own EOD were observed in the mesencephalic lateral nucleus. Responses to artificial electric pulses were obtained only if delivered in a certain phase realtion to the MCAS. The MCAS displays a facilitating effect on the slow conducting electrosensory system. 7. Results indicate the existence in mormyrids of a double, fast and slow conducting, electrosensory system similar to that of gymnotid fish. The mormyrids can control both of these electrosensory systems by means of the MCAS, the effect of which is opposite for the same time period on the two systems.     

Electroreceptor model of weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii: II. Cellular origin of inverse waveform tuning.

In part I (. Biophys. J. 75:1712-1726), we presented a cellular model of the A- and B-electroreceptors of the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. The model made clear the cellular origin of the differences in the response functions of A- and B-receptors, which sensitively code the intensity of the fish's own electric organ discharge (EOD) and the variations in the EOD waveform, respectively. The main purpose of the present paper is to clarify the cellular origin of the inverse waveform tuning of the B-receptors by using the receptor model. Inverse waveform tuning means that B-receptors respond more sensitively to the 180 degrees inverted EOD than to undistorted or less distorted EODs. We investigated how the A- and B-receptor models respond to EODs with various waveforms, which are the phase-shifted EODs, whose shift angle is varied from -1 degrees to -180 degrees, and single-period sine wave stimuli of various frequencies. We show that the tuning properties of the B-receptors arise mainly from the combination of two attributes: 1) The waveform of the stimuli (Bstim) effectively sensed by the B-receptor cells. This consists of a first smaller and a second larger positive peak, even though in the original phase-shifted EOD stimuli, the amplitudes of the two positive peaks are reversed. 2) The effective time constant of dynamical response of the receptor cells. It is on the order of the duration of a single EOD pulse. We also calculated the response properties of the A- and B-receptor models when stimulated with natural EODs distorted by various capacitive and resistive objects. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of EOD amplitude on the receptor responses to capacitive and resistive objects. The models presented can systematically reproduce the experimentally observed response properties of natural A- and B-receptor cells. The mechanism producing these properties can be reasonably explained by the variation in the stimulus waveforms effectively sensed by the A- and B-receptor cells and by time constants.     

Vision and electroreception: Integration of sensory information in the optic tectum of the weakly electric fishApteronotus albifrons

Summary The responses of single neurons to visual and electrosensory stimulation were studied in the optic tectum of the weakly electric fishApteronotus albifrons. Most of the cells recorded in the region of the tectum studied, the anterior medial quadrant, were poorly responsive or completely insensitive to flashes of light or to bursts of AC electrical stimuli applied to the entire fish. However, these cells gave vigorous responses to moving visual or electrosensory stimuli. Most cells showed differences in their response contingent upon the direction of the stimulus movement and most received input from both the visual and electrosensory systems. Electrosensory responses to moving stimuli were depressed by jamming stimuli, 4 Hz amplitude modulation of the animal's electric organ discharge, presented simultaneously with the moving stimulus. However, the jamming signal presented alone typically evoked no response. Moving visual stimuli, presented simultaneously with the electrosensory, were usually able to restore the magnitude of a response toward its value in the unjammed situation. For most of the cells studied the receptive fields for vision and electroreception were in register. In some cases the visual and electrosensory components could be separated by presenting the two types of stimuli separately, or by presenting both simultaneously but with some amount of spatial separation, which causes the two to be misaligned relative to the fish. In other cases the individual responses could not be separated by spatial manipulations of the two stimuli and in these cases differences in the alignment of the two types of stimuli could cause changes in the intensity of the cells' responses.Abbreviations AM amplitude modulation - EOD electric organ discharge - PLLL posterior lateral line lobe     

Stimulus discrimination in the diencephalon ofEigenmannia: the emergence and sharpening of a sensory filter

Summary Neuronal reliability and sensitivity to behaviorally relevant stimulus patterns were investigated in a higher-order nucleus of the diencephalon believed to participate in the jamming avoidance response (JAR) of the weakly electric fish,Eigenmannia. The fish raises or lowers its frequency of electric organ discharge (EOD) to minimize interference from a neighboring fish's EOD. Proper JARs require determination of the sign of the difference frequency (Df) between the neighboring fish's EOD and the fish's own EOD. Bastian and Yuthas (1984) recently described diencephalic neurons within the nucleus electrosensorius that are able to make this determination. In the present study, response properties of such neurons were compared with those of lower-level sign-selective cells found in the torus semicircularis and the optic tectum (Heiligenberg and Rose 1985) as well as with properties of the intact behavior.Most sign-selective cells within the nucleus electrosensorius show a high degree of selectivity for one sign of the difference frequency; cells with either sign preference were found in approximately equal numbers. The sign preference and the degree of sign selectivity is most often independent of the spatial orientation of the jamming stimulus. In contrast, the responses of toral and tectal cells are less robust and consistent and are often highly dependent on the geometry of the jamming stimulus.Determination of the sign of the difference frequency requires the analysis of amplitude modulations coupled with modulations in phase (timing) differences between pairs of areas of the body surface. The most sensitive cells recorded in the nucleus electrosensorius can determine the sign of the difference frequency with timing differences of 1 s or less, roughly comparable to the behavioral threshold of 400 ns (Carr et al. 1986). The best toral/tectal response required at least a 16 s modulation.Cells within the nucleus electrosensorius thus code the sign of Df with a high degree of reliability and sensitivity. Ambiguities persist, however, which suggest that single cells at this level cannot completely account for the behavioral discrimination. Additional processing may be necessary to transform a still primarily sensory code into a motor program for control of the JAR (Rose et al. 1988).Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jammning avoidance response - Df difference frequency between jamming signal and fish's own EOD - S ₁ sinusoidal EOD mimic of subject fish - S ₂ sinusoidal EOD mimic of neighbor     

Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: behavior

Electrolocation behavior of Apteronotus leptorhynchus was studied by monitoring the animal's ability to maintain orientation to a variety of moving electrolocation targets. The primary goal of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness of various types of electrical 'jamming signals' in disrupting electrolocation performance. 1. Two measures of electrolocation performance were used: The latency between the electrolocation target motion and the fish's following response, and the minimum distance separating the fish from the target during the target movement sequence. Latency increased and minimum fish-target distance decreased as target size was decreased, and when large diameter ceramic targets were used as control stimuli the fish were less able to avoid, and frequently collided with, these 'electrically transparent' objects. 2. Four types of jamming signals were used in attempts to mask the electrosensory input used for electrolocation. Broad-band noise and sinusoidal signals, different in frequency by a few Hz from the animal's personal electric organ discharge (DF stimuli), were used to jam the tuberous electroreceptors. Five Hz and 50 Hz sinusoidal signals were used to jam the low-frequency or ampullary receptor system. Both the noise and the DF stimuli were effective in reducing electrolocation performance, and the threshold intensity for behavior deterioration was about three-fold lower for DF stimuli as compared to the noise. The rate of change of response deterioration as a function of increasing jamming intensity was, however, not different for these two types of stimuli. Neither the 50 Hz nor the 5 Hz jamming signals caused electrolocation deterioration when presented alone. However, 5 Hz jamming, when added to either the noise or DF jamming, did result in significant increments in response deterioration. This suggests that the ampullary receptors can provide supplementary information for electrolocation. 3. Electrolocation performance deterioration was also studied with various difference frequencies between an animal's EOD and the sinusoidal jamming stimulus. Increasing DF results in decreased electrolocation deterioration, but even at the highest DF frequencies used (128 Hz) significant response degradation was observed. 4. The apparent differences in the effectiveness of noise and DF stimulation in reducing electrolocation performance are largely accounted for by the differential effects of the tuberous electroreceptor filter characteristics on these two types of signals.     

Single unit activity in the mesencephalon of Sternarchus

Action potentials evoked in a phase-locked 1 : 1 relationship by natural electric organ discharges (EOD) were recorded extracellularly and intracellularly from single mesencephalic magnocellular nucleus units in the high frequency electric fish Sternarchus albifrons (Gymnotidae). This activity has been shown to be the result of an extrinsic feedback of the electrosensory system and is probably important for the socalled jamming avoidance response triggered artificial electric pulses when delivered into the water in a 1 : 1 relationship at intensities higher than the EOD. In the same way, artificial pulses of frequency near EOD could either drive or, due to beats, greatly disturb the regular firing of the units. More insight into the neural mechanism was yielded by single EOD-triggered shocks provoking a failure in firing of certain action potentials of the series and causing long-lasting (10-20 ms) accelerations and decelerations of the regular EOD-evoked firing (transient disturbance). Intracellular stimulations show similar effects. The biological significance of this neural mechanism for the fish's electroperception and JAR is discussed.     

Phantoms in the brain: Ambiguous representations of stimulus amplitude and timing in weakly electric fish

In wave-type weakly electric fish, two distinct types of primary afferent fibers are specialized for separately encoding modulations in the amplitude and phase (timing) of electrosensory stimuli. Time-coding afferents phase lock to periodic stimuli and respond to changes in stimulus phase with shifts in spike timing. Amplitude-coding afferents fire sporadically to periodic stimuli. Their probability of firing in a given cycle, and therefore their firing rate, is proportional to stimulus amplitude. However, the spike times of time-coding afferents are also affected by changes in amplitude; similarly, the firing rates of amplitude-coding afferents are also affected by changes in phase. Because identical changes in the activity of an individual primary afferent can be caused by modulations in either the amplitude or phase of stimuli, there is ambiguity regarding the information content of primary afferent responses that can result in ‘phantom’ modulations not present in an actual stimulus. Central electrosensory neurons in the hindbrain and midbrain respond to these phantom modulations. Phantom modulations can also elicit behavioral responses, indicating that ambiguity in the encoding of amplitude and timing information ultimately distorts electrosensory perception. A lack of independence in the encoding of multiple stimulus attributes can therefore result in perceptual illusions. Similar effects may occur in other sensory systems as well. In particular, the vertebrate auditory system is thought to be phylogenetically related to the electrosensory system and it encodes information about amplitude and timing in similar ways. It has been well established that pitch perception and loudness perception are both affected by the frequency and intensity of sounds, raising the intriguing possibility that auditory perception may also be affected by ambiguity in the encoding of sound amplitude and timing.     

Communication in the weakly electric fish Sternopygus macrurus

There is a sexual dimorphism in the frequency of the quasi-sinusoidal electric organ discharge (EOD) of Sternopygus macrurus, with males, on average, an octave lower. EODs are detected by tuberous electroreceptor organs, which exhibit V-shaped frequency tuning with maximal sensitivity near the fish's own EOD frequency. This would seem to limit the ability of a fish to detect the EODs of opposite-sex conspecifics. However, electroreceptor tuning has always been based on single-frequency stimulation, while actual EOD detection involves the addition of a conspecific EOD to the fish's own. In the present study, recordings were made from single electroreceptive units while the fish were stimulated with pairs of sine waves: one (S1) representing the fish's own EOD added to a second (S2) representing a conspecific EOD. T unit response was easily predicted by assuming that the electroreceptor acts as a linear filter in series with a threshold-sensitive spike initiator. P unit response was more complex, and unexpectedly high sensitivity was found for frequencies of S2 well displaced from the fish's EOD frequency. For both P and T units, detection thresholds for S2 were much lower when added to S1, than when presented alone.     

Sensory cues for the gradual frequency fall responses of the gymnotiform electric fish, Rhamphichthys rostratus

The sensory cues for a less known form of frequency shifting behavior, gradual frequency falls, of electric organ discharges (EODs) in a pulse-type gymnotiform electric fish, Rhamphichthys rostratus, were identified. We found that the gradual frequency fall occurs independently of more commonly observed momentary phase shifting behavior, and is due to perturbation of sensory feedback of the fish's own EODs by EODs of neighboring fish. The following components were identified as essential features in the signal mixture of the fish's own and the neighbor's EOD pulses: (1) the neighbor's pulses must be placed within a few millisecond of the fish's own pulses, (2) the neighbor's pulses, presented singly at low frequencies (0.2–4 Hz), were sufficient, (3) the frequency of individual pulse presentation must be below 4 Hz, (4) amplitude modulation of the sensory feedback of the fish's own pulses induced by such insertions of the neighbor's pulses must contain a high frequency component: sinusoidal amplitude modulation of the fish's own EOD feedback at these low frequencies does not induce gradual frequency falls. Differential stimulation across body surfaces, which is required for the jamming avoidance response (JAR) of wave-type gymnotiform electric fish, was not necessary for this behavior. We propose a cascade of high-pass and low-pass frequency filters within the amplitude processing pathway in the central nervous system as the mechanism of the gradual frequency fall response.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - f frequency of EOD or pacemaker command signal - JAR jamming avoidance response - S ₁ stimulus mimicking fish's own EOD - f ₁ frequency of S₁ - S ₂ stimulus mimicking neighbor's EOD - f ₂ frequency of S₂     

Behavioral detection of electric signal waveform distortion in the weakly electric fish,Gnathonemus petersii

The novelty response of weakly electric mormyrids is a transient acceleration of the rate of electric organ discharges (EOD) elicited by a change in stimulus input. In this study, we used it as a tool to test whether Gnathonemus petersii can perceive minute waveform distortions of its EOD that are caused by capacitive objects, as would occur during electrolocation. Four predictions of a hypothesis concerning the mechanism of capacitance detection were tested and confirmed: (1) G. petersii exhibited a strong novelty response to computer-generated (synthetic) electric stimuli that mimic both the waveform and frequency shifts of the EOD caused by natural capacitive objects (Fig. 3). (2) Similar responses were elicited by synthetic stimuli in which only the waveform distortion due to phase shifting the EOD frequency components was present (Fig. 4). (3) Novelty responses could reliably be evoked by a constant amplitude phase shifted EOD that effects the entire body of the fish evenly, i.e., a phase difference across the body surface was lacking (Figs. 3, 4). (4) Local presentation of a phase-shifted EOD mimic that stimulated only a small number of electroreceptor organs at a single location was also effective in eliciting a behavioral response (Fig. 5).Our results indicate that waveform distortions due to phase shifts alone, i.e. independent of amplitude or frequency cues, are sufficient for the detection of capacitive, animate objects. Mormyrids perceive even minute waveform changes of their own EODs by centrally comparing the input of the two types of receptor cells within a single mormyromast electroreceptor organ. Thus, no comparison of differentially affected body regions is necessary. This shows that G. petersii indeed uses a unique mechanism for signal analysis, which is different from the one employed by gymnotiform wavefish.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - p-p-amplitude peak-to-peak amplitude     

Electrolocation in the presence of jamming signals: electroreceptor physiology

Responses of ampullary and tuberous electroreceptor afferents were studied using moving electrolocation targets and electrical modulations of the animal's electric organ discharge as stimuli. The ability of the electroreceptors to encode these stimuli was measured with and without various forms of electrical jamming signals. The goal of this study was to measure the deterioration in electroreceptor responses due to the jamming signals, and to compare these results with the behavioral measures of electrolocation under the same conditions of jamming as described in the preceding report (Bastian 1987). 1. Three types of jamming stimuli were used to interfere with the tuberous electroreceptor afferents' ability to respond to the test stimuli mentioned above: Broad-band noise, high frequency stimuli consisting of a sinusoidal waveform having a frequency maintained at a chosen difference frequency (DF) from the EOD frequency of the fish being studied, and 5 or 50 Hz sinusoidal stimuli. 2. The tuberous receptor afferents' spontaneous frequency was sensitive to continuous presentation of all but the 5 Hz jamming signals. The 4 Hz DF signal caused the largest increase in spontaneous activity, the 50 Hz stimulus was intermediate in effectiveness, and the noise stimulus caused the smallest increase. Estimates of the variability of the ongoing receptor activity were also made, and both the 4 Hz DF and the 50 Hz stimuli reduced the coefficient of variation of the receptor activity, but noise had no significant effect on this parameter. Noise, 4 Hz DF, and 50 Hz jamming signals also reduced the tuberous receptors' responses to a 100 ms EOD amplitude modulation, and the 5 Hz stimulus was again ineffective. 3. Noise and 4 Hz DF jamming were also effective in reducing tuberous receptor afferents' responses to a moving metal electrolocation target. The 4 Hz DF stimulus was most effective in reducing the receptor's ability to encode information about the target. Receptor responses showed about a three-fold larger decrease per 10 dB increase in DF jamming amplitude as compared to similar sized increases in noise amplitude. Threshold target distances were also determined with and without noise and DF jamming, and again, the noise stimulus was less effective in reducing the distance at which electrolocation targets were just detectable. 4. Recordings from ampullary receptor afferents confirmed that the galvanic potentials produced by metal electrolocation targets stimulate these receptors while EOD distortions caused by such objects probably do not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Behavioral responses to jamming and ‘phantom’ jamming stimuli in the weakly electric fish <Emphasis Type="Italic">Eigenmannia</Emphasis>

The jamming avoidance response (JAR) of the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia is characterized by upward or downward shifts in electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency that are elicited by particular combinations of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) and differential phase modulation (DPM). However, non-jamming stimuli that consist of AM and/or DPM can elicit similar shifts in EOD frequency. We tested the hypothesis that these behavioral responses result from non-jamming stimuli being misperceived as jamming stimuli. Responses to non-jamming stimuli were similar to JARs as measured by modulation rate tuning, sensitivity, and temporal dynamics. There was a smooth transition between the magnitude of JARs and responses to stimuli with variable depths of AM or DPM, suggesting that frequency shifts in response to jamming and non-jamming stimuli represent different points along a continuum rather than categorically distinct behaviors. We also tested the hypothesis that non-jamming stimuli can elicit frequency shifts in natural contexts. Frequency decreases could be elicited by semi-natural AM stimuli, such as random AM, AM presented to a localized portion of the body surface, transient changes in amplitude, and movement of resistive objects through the electric field. We conclude that ‘phantom’ jamming stimuli can induce EOD frequency shifts in natural situations.     

Spatial aspects of electrolocation in the mormyrid fish, Gnathonemus petersii

The range of electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii, was determined for plastic and aluminium cubes. A characteristic change in the fish's EOD activity, and abrupt change to more uniform EOD intervals (regularization), was used as the criterion for object detection. The average response distances extending laterally from the fish's longitudinal axis were significantly different (p less than 0.05) for the aluminium cube (5.4 cm) and the plastic cube (7.0 cm).     

From distributed sensory processing to discrete motor representations in the diencephalon of the electric fish,Eigenmannia

Summary During their jamming avoidance response (JAR), weakly electric fish of the genusEigenmannia shift their electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency away from a similar EOD frequency of a neighboring fish. The behavioral rules and neural substrates for stimulus recognition and motor control of the JAR have been extensively studied (see review by Heiligenberg 1986). The diencephalic nucleus electrosensorius (nE) links sensory processing within the torus semicircularis and optic tectum with the mesencephalic prepacemaker nucleus which, in turn, modulates the medullary pacemaker nucleus and hence the EOD frequency. Two separate areas within the nE responsible for JAR-related EOD frequency rises and frequency falls, respectively, were identified by iontophoresis of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate. Bilateral lesion of the areas causing EOD frequency rises resulted in elimination of JAR-related frequency rises above a baseline frequency obtained in the absence of a jamming stimulus. Similarly, bilateral lesion of the areas causing frequency falls resulted in a loss of JAR-related frequency falls below the baseline frequency. Whether these areas are also responsible for non-JAR-related frequency shifts is not known. The strength of response and spatial extent of the areas causing frequency shifts varied among fish and also varied in individual fish, reflecting the strength of JAR-related frequency shifts and the balance of activities in frequency-rise and frequency-fall areas. Local application of bicuculline-methiodide or GABA demonstrated a tonic inhibitory input to each area and suggests a reciprocal inhibitory interaction between the two ipsilateral areas, possibly accounting for much of the individual plasticity.The nE thus is a site for neuronal transformation from distributed, topographically organized processing within the laminated structures of the torus and tectum to discrete cell clusters which control antagonistic motor responses.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response - Df difference frequency between jamming signal and the fish's own EOD - nE nucleus electrosensorius - PPn prepacemaker nucleus