Recognizing and defining true Ras binding domains II: in silico prediction based on homology modelling and energy calculations

Considering the large number of putative Ras effector proteins, it is highly desirable to develop computational methods to be able to identify true Ras binding molecules. Based on a limited sequence homology among members of the Ras association (RA) and Ras binding (RB) sub-domain families of the ubiquitin super-family, we have built structural homology models of Ras proteins in complex with different RA and RB domains, using the FOLD-X software. A critical step in our approach is to use different templates of Ras complexes, in order to account for the structural variation among the RA and RB domains. The homology models are validated by predicting the effect of mutating hot spot residues in the interface, and residues important for the specificity of interaction with different Ras proteins. The FOLD-X calculated energies of the best-modelled complexes are in good agreement with previously published experimental data and with new data reported here. Based on these results, we can establish energy thresholds above, or below which, we can predict with 96% confidence that a RA/RB domain will or will not interact with Ras. This study shows the importance of in depth structural analysis, high quality force-fields and modelling for correct prediction. Our work opens the possibility of genome-wide prediction for this protein family and for others, where there is enough structural information.     

RA-GEF, a novel Rap1A guanine nucleotide exchange factor containing a Ras/Rap1A-associating domain, is conserved between nematode and humans

A yeast two-hybrid screening for Ras-binding proteins in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has identified a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) containing a Ras/Rap1A-associating (RA) domain, termed Ce-RA-GEF. Both Ce-RA-GEF and its human counterpart Hs-RA-GEF possessed a PSD-95/DlgA/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain and a Ras exchanger motif (REM) domain in addition to the RA and GEF domains. They also contained a region homologous to a cyclic nucleotide monophosphate-binding domain, which turned out to be incapable of binding cAMP or cGMP. Although the REM and GEF domains are conserved with other GEFs acting on Ras family small GTP-binding proteins, the RA and PDZ domains are unseen in any of them. Hs-RA-GEF exhibited not only a GTP-dependent binding activity to Rap1A at its RA domain but also an activity to stimulate GDP/GTP exchange of Rap1A both in vitro and in vivo at the segment containing its REM and GEF domains. However, it did not exhibit any binding or GEF activity toward Ras. On the other hand, Ce-RA-GEF associated with and stimulated GDP/GTP exchange of both Ras and Rap1A. These results indicate that Ce-RA-GEF and Hs-RA-GEF define a novel class of Rap1A GEF molecules, which are conserved through evolution.     

Specificity in Ras and Rap Signaling

Ras and Rap proteins are closely related small GTPases. Whereas Ras is known for its role in cell proliferation and survival, Rap1 is predominantly involved in cell adhesion and cell junction formation. Ras and Rap are regulated by different sets of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GTPase-activating proteins, determining one level of specificity. In addition, although the effector domains are highly similar, Rap and Ras interact with largely different sets of effectors, providing a second level of specificity. In this review, we discuss the regulatory proteins and effectors of Ras and Rap, with a focus on those of Rap.Ras-like small G-proteins are ubiquitously expressed, conserved molecular switches that couple extracellular signals to various cellular responses. Different signals can activate GEFs² that induce the small G-protein to switch from the inactive, GDP-bound state to the active, GTP-bound state. This induces a conformational change that allows downstream effector proteins to bind specifically to and be activated by the GTP-bound protein to mediate diverse biological responses. Small G-proteins are returned to the GDP-bound state by hydrolyzing GTP with the help of GAPs. Ras (Ha-Ras, Ki-Ras, and N-Ras) and Rap proteins (Rap1A, Rap1B, Rap2A, Rap2B, and Rap2C) have similar effector-binding regions that interact predominantly with RA domains or the structurally similar RBDs present in a variety of different proteins. Both protein families operate in different signaling networks. For instance, Ras is central in a network controlling cell proliferation and cell survival, whereas Rap1 predominantly controls cell adhesion, cell junction formation, cell secretion, and cell polarity. These different functions are reflected in a largely different set of GEFs and GAPs. Also the downstream effector proteins operate in a selective manner in either one of the networks.     

GTP-Ras disrupts the intramolecular complex of C1 and RA domains of Nore1

The novel Ras effector mNore1, capable of inducing apoptosis, is a multidomain protein. It comprises a C1 domain homologous to PKC and an RA domain similar to the Ras effectors AF-6 and RalGDS. Here, we determine the affinity of these two domains to the active forms of Ras and Rap1 using isothermal calorimetric titration. The interaction of Ras/Rap1-GTP with the RA domain of mNore1 is weakened significantly by direct binding of the C1 domain to the RA domain. In order to analyze this observation in atomic detail, we solved the C1 solution structure by NMR. By determining chemical shifts and relaxation rates, we can show an intramolecular complex of C1-RA. GTP-Ras titration and binding to RA disrupts this complex and displaces the C1 domain. Once the C1 domain tumbles freely in solution, a lipid binding interface becomes accessible. Furthermore, we provide evidence of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate binding of the free C1 domain.     

Identification of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for the Rap1 GTPase. Regulation of MR-GEF by M-Ras-GTP interaction

Although the Ras subfamily of GTPases consists of approximately 20 members, only a limited number of guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that couple extracellular stimuli to Ras protein activation have been identified. Furthermore, no novel downstream effectors have been identified for the M-Ras/R-Ras3 GTPase. Here we report the identification and characterization of three Ras family GEFs that are most abundantly expressed in brain. Two of these GEFs, MR-GEF (M-Ras-regulated GEF, KIAA0277) and PDZ-GEF (KIAA0313) bound specifically to nucleotide-free Rap1 and Rap1/Rap2, respectively. Both proteins functioned as Rap1 GEFs in vivo. A third GEF, GRP3 (KIAA0846), activated both Ras and Rap1 and shared significant sequence homology with the calcium- and diacylglycerol-activated GEFs, GRP1 and GRP2. Similarly to previously identified Rap GEFs, C3G and Smg GDS, each of the newly identified exchange factors promoted the activation of Elk-1 in the LNCaP prostate tumor cell line where B-Raf can couple Rap1 to the extracellular receptor-activated kinase cascade. MR-GEF and PDZ-GEF both contain a region immediately N-terminal to their catalytic domains that share sequence homology with Ras-associating or RalGDS/AF6 homology (RA) domains. By searching for in vitro interaction with Ras-GTP proteins, PDZ-GEF specifically bound to Rap1A- and Rap2B-GTP, whereas MR-GEF bound to M-Ras-GTP. C-terminally truncated MR-GEF, lacking the GEF catalytic domain, retained its ability to bind M-Ras-GTP, suggesting that the RA domain is important for this interaction. Co-immunoprecipitation studies confirmed the interaction of M-Ras-GTP with MR-GEF in vivo. In addition, a constitutively active M-Ras(71L) mutant inhibited the ability of MR-GEF to promote Rap1A activation in a dose-dependent manner. These data suggest that M-Ras may inhibit Rap1 in order to elicit its biological effects.     

Characterisation of PDZ-GEFs,a family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors specific for Rap1 and Rap2

PDZ-GEF1 (RA-GEF/nRapGEP/CNrasGEF) is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) characterised by the presence of a PSD-95/DlgA/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain, a Ras-association (RA) domain and a region related to a cyclic nucleotide binding domain (RCBD). These domains are in addition to a Ras exchange motif (REM) and GEF domain characteristic for GEFs for Ras-like small GTPases. PDZ-GEF1 efficiently exchanges nucleotides of both Rap1 and Rap2, but has also been implicated in mediating cAMP-induced Ras activation through binding of cAMP to the RCBD. Here we describe a new family member, PDZ-GEF2, of which we isolated two splice variants (PDZ-GEF2A and 2B). PDZ-GEF2 contains, in addition to the domains characteristic for PDZ-GEF1, a second, less conserved RCBD at the N-terminus. PDZ-GEF2 is also specific for both Rap1 and Rap2. We further investigated the possibility that PDZ-GEF2, like PDZ-GEF1, is a cAMP-responsive GEF for Ras. However, in contrast to previous results, we did not find any effect of either PDZ-GEF1 or PDZ-GEF2 on Ras in the absence or presence of cAMP. Moreover, affinity measurements by isothermic calorimetry showed that the RCBD of PDZ-GEF1 does not bind cAMP with a physiologically relevant affinity. We conclude that both PDZ-GEF1 and 2 are specific for Rap1 and Rap2 and unresponsive to cAMP and various other nucleotides.     

Differential ubiquitin binding of the UBA domains from human c-Cbl and Cbl-b: NMR structural and biochemical insights

The Cbl proteins, RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligases, are responsible for ubiquitinating the activated tyrosine kinases and targeting them for degradation. Both c-Cbl and Cbl-b have a UBA (ubiquitin-associated) domain at their C-terminal ends, and these two UBA domains share a high sequence similarity (75%). However, only the UBA from Cbl-b, but not from c-Cbl, can bind ubiquitin (Ub). To understand the mechanism by which the UBA domains specifically interact with Ub with different affinities, we determined the solution NMR structures of these two UBA domains, cUBA from human c-Cbl and UBAb from Cbl-b. Their structures show that these two UBA domains share the same fold, a compact three-helix bundle, highly resembling the typical UBA fold. Chemical shift perturbation experiments reveal that the helix-1 and loop-1 of UBAb form a predominately hydrophobic surface for Ub binding. By comparing the Ub-interacting surface on UBAb and its counterpart on cUBA, we find that the hydrophobic patch on cUBA is interrupted by a negatively charged residue Glu12. Fluorescence titration data show that the Ala12Glu mutant of UBAb completely loses the ability to bind Ub, whereas the mutation disrupting the dimerization has no significant effect on Ub binding. This study provides structural and biochemical insights into the Ub binding specificities of the Cbl UBA domains, in which the hydrophobic surface distribution on the first helix plays crucial roles in their differential affinities for Ub binding. That is, the amino acid residue diversity in the helix-1 region, but not the dimerization, determines the abilities of various UBA domains binding with Ub.     

Biochemical characterization of baculovirus-expressed rap1A/Krev-1 and its regulation by GTPase-activating proteins.

Normal human rap1A and 35A rap1A (which encodes a protein with a Thr-35----Ala mutation) were cloned into a baculovirus transfer vector and expressed in Sf9 insect cells. The resulting proteins were purified, and their nucleotide binding, GTPase activities, and responsiveness to GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) were characterized and compared with those of Rap1 purified from human neutrophils. Recombinant wild-type Rap1A bound GTP gamma S, GTP, and GDP with affinities similar to those observed for neutrophil Rap1 protein. The rate of exchange of GTP by Rap1 without Mg2+ was much slower than that by Ras. The basal GTPase activities by both recombinant proteins were lower than that observed with the neutrophil Rap1, but the GTPase activity of the neutrophil and wild-type recombinant Rap1 proteins could be stimulated to similar levels by Rap-GAP activity in neutrophil cytosol. In contrast to wild-type Rap1A, the GTPase activity of 35A Rap was unresponsive to Rap-GAP stimulation. Neither recombinant Rap1A nor neutrophil Rap1 protein GTPase activity could be stimulated by recombinant Ras-GAP at a concentration 25-fold higher than that required to hydrolyze 50% of H-Ras-bound GTP under similar conditions. These results suggest that the putative effector domains (amino acids 32 to 40) shared between Rap1 and Ras are functionally similar and interact with their respective GAPs. However, although Rap1 and Ras are identical in this region, secondary structure or additional regions must confer the ability to respond to GAPs.     

Critical function of the Ras-associating domain as a primary Ras-binding site for regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae adenylyl cyclase.

Mammalian candidate effectors of the small GTPase Ras, such as RalGDS, afadin/AF-6, Rin1, and phospholipase Cepsilon, have been shown to share structurally conserved modules termed Ras-associating (RA) domains at their Ras-binding sites. The Ras-binding domains of Raf-1 and phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma (other Ras effectors) also share a similar tertiary structure with the RA domains. On the other hand, the primary Ras-binding site of Saccharomyces cerevisiae adenylyl cyclase, the best characterized Ras effector, has been mapped by mutational studies to the leucine-rich repeats (LRR) domain (amino acids 674-1300), whose structure apparently bears no resemblance to the RA domains. By a computer algorithm-based search we have unexpectedly found an RA domain in the N-terminal 81 amino acid residues (676) of the LRR domain. The purified RA-domain polypeptide exhibits an ability to bind directly to Ras in a GTP-dependent manner and to competitively inhibit Ras-dependent activation of adenylyl cyclase in vitro, with an affinity comparable with that of the whole LRR domain. The specificity of binding of the RA domain to various Ras effector region mutants is indistinguishable from that of the full-length adenylyl cyclase. The activated RAS2 (RAS2(Val-19))-dependent heat shock sensitivity of yeast cells is suppressed by overexpression of the RA domain polypeptide. Further, mutations of the RA domain abolish its Ras binding activity, and adenylyl cyclase molecules carrying these mutations are rendered unactivatable by Ras in vitro. This RA domain bears highest similarity to the Ras-binding domain of Raf-1 based on comparison of its primary and predicted secondary structures with those of other Ras effectors. These results indicate that the RA domain is a primary Ras-binding site for activation of adenylyl cyclase, implicating RA domains as universal modules for interaction of effectors with Ras, conserved from yeast to mammals.     

Solution structure of the Ras binding domain of the protein kinase Byr2 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

BACKGROUND: After activation, small GTPases such as Ras transfer the incoming signal to effectors by specifically interacting with the binding domain of these proteins. Structural details of the binding domain of different effectors determine which pathway is predominantly activated. Byr2 from fission yeast is a functional homolog of Raf, which is the direct downstream target of Ras in mammalians that initiates a protein kinase cascade. The amino acid sequence of Byr2's Ras binding domain is only weakly related to that of Raf, and Byr2's three-dimensional structure is unknown. RESULTS: We have solved the 3D structure of the Ras binding domain of Byr2 (Byr2RBD) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe in solution. The structure consists of three alpha helices and a mixed five-stranded beta pleated sheet arranged in the topology betabetaalphabetabetaalphabetaalpha with the first seven canonic secondary structure elements forming a ubiquitin superfold. 15N-(1)H-TROSY-HSQC spectroscopy of the complex of Byr2RBD with Ras*Mg(2+)*GppNHp reveals that the first and second beta strands and the first alpha helix of Byr2 are mainly involved in the protein-protein interaction as observed in other Ras binding domains. Although the putative interaction site of H-Ras from human and Ras1 from S. pombe are identical in sequence, binding to Byr2 leads to small but significant differences in the NMR spectra, indicating a slightly different binding mode. CONCLUSIONS: The ubiquitin superfold appears to be the general structural motif for Ras binding domains even in cases with vanishing sequence identity. However, details of the 3D structure and the interacting interface are different, thereby determining the specifity of the recognition of Ras and Ras-related proteins.     

Thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of the interaction between the Ras binding domain of AF6 and members of the Ras subfamily

Cellular signaling downstream of Ras is highly diversified and may involve many different effector molecules. A potential candidate is AF6 which was originally identified as a fusion to ALL-1 in acute myeloid leukemia. In the present work the interaction between Ras and AF6 is characterized and compared with other effectors. The binding characteristics are quite similar to Raf and RalGEF, i.e. nucleotide dissociation as well as GTPase-activating protein activity are inhibited, whereas the intrinsic GTPase activity of Ras is unperturbed by AF6 binding. Particularly, the dynamics of interaction are similar to Raf and RalGEF with a lifetime of the Ras. AF6 complex in the millisecond range. As probed by 31P NMR spectroscopy one of two major conformational states of Ras is stabilized by the interaction with AF6. Looking at the affinities of AF6 to a number of Ras mutants in the effector region, a specificity profile emerges distinct from that of other effector molecules. This finding may be useful in defining the biological function of AF6 by selectively switching off other pathways downstream of Ras using the appropriate effector mutant. Notably, among the Ras-related proteins AF6 binds most tightly to Rap1A which could imply a role of Rap1A in AF6 regulation.     

Nore1B regulates TCR signaling via Ras and Carma1

Nore1A was originally identified as a potential Ras effector, and Nore1B is an alternatively spliced isoform. Both share a Ras/Rap association domain (RA domain) but only Nore1A contains sequence motifs that predict SH3 domain binding and diacylglycerol/phorbol ester binding in the amino-terminal region. Here we report that Carma1 binds to Nore1A and Nore1B through the RA domain and that Carma1 interacts with active Ras in the presence of Nore1B. RNA interference against Nore1B attenuates NF-kappaB activation induced by T cell receptor (TCR) ligation, but not NF-kappaB activation induced by TNFalpha or lipoteichoic acid. In addition, Nore1B is also required for KiRas GV12-mediated ERK1 activation and Elk1 reporter activity in T cells. We also provide evidence that knockdown of Nore1B also impairs polarized redistribution of Ras at the B cell-T cell immune interface. Together, these findings suggest that endogenous Nore1B recruits active Ras to the APC-T cell interface and mediates the interaction between Ras and Carma1.     

A genome-wide Ras-effector interaction network

Here using structural information and protein design tools we have drawn the network of interactions between 20 Ras subfamily proteins with 50 putative Ras binding domains. To validate this network we have cloned six poorly characterized Ras binding domains (RBD) and two Ras proteins (RERG, DiRas1). These, together with previously described RBD domains, Ras and Rap proteins have been analyzed in 70 pull-down experiments. Comparing our interaction network with these and previous pull-down experiments (total of 150 cases) shows a very high accuracy for distinguishing between binders and non-binders ( approximately 0.80). Bioinformatics information was integrated to distinguish those in vitro interactions that are more likely to be relevant in vivo. We proposed several new interactions between Ras family members and effector domains that are of relevance in understanding the physiological role of these proteins. More broadly our results demonstrate that (domain-domain) interaction specificities between members of protein families can be accurately predicted using structural information.     

nRap GEP: a novel neural GDP/GTP exchange protein for rap1 small G protein that interacts with synaptic scaffolding molecule (S-SCAM).

Synaptic scaffolding molecule (S-SCAM) has six PDZ domains through which it interacts with N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors and neuroligin at synaptic junctions. We isolated here a novel S-SCAM-binding protein. This protein has one PDZ, one Ras association, one Ras GDP/GTP exchange protein (Ras GEP) domain, and one C-terminal consensus motif for binding to PDZ domains. We named it nRap GEP (neural Rap GEP). nRap GEP moreover has an incomplete cyclic AMP (cAMP)-binding (CAB) domain. The domain organization of nRap GEP is similar to that of Epac/cAMP-guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) I, except that Epac/cAMP-GEFI has complete CAB and Ras GEP domains but lacks the other two domains and the C-terminal motif. nRap GEP showed GEP activity for Rap1 but did not bind cAMP. nRap GEP was specifically expressed in rat brain. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that nRap GEP and S-SCAM were localized at synaptic areas of the cerebellum. These results suggest that nRap GEP is a novel neural Rap1-specific GEP which is associated with S-SCAM.     

Rap1A antagonizes the ability of Ras and Ras-Gap to inhibit muscarinic K+ channels

Rap1A is a Ras-related GTP binding protein which has an amino acid sequence identical to that of Ras in the putative "effector" domain (amino acids 32-40). The binding of Rap1A to Ras-GTPase activating protein (GAP) through this domain is a potential mechanism for explaining the observation that Rap1A can antagonize the ability of oncogenic Ras to transform cells. It was recently shown (Yatani, A., Okabe, K., Polakis, P., Halenbeck, R., McCormick, F., and Brown, A. M. (1990) Cell 61, 769-776) that the activation of M2-muscarinic receptor-coupled K+ channels in heart is inhibited by the addition of exogenous Ras and Ras-GAP. We have made use of this system in the present paper to show that Rap1A is able to effectively block this inhibitory action of Ras-GAP. We observed that both Rap1A-GDP and Rap1A-guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTP gamma S) were able to block the inhibitory effect of Ras-GAP upon channel activation. This effect occurred at picomolar concentrations of Rap1A, and the GTP gamma S-bound form of the protein was consistently found to be more potent than the GDP form. A Rap1A Thr35----Ala mutation which bound GTP gamma S did not prevent K+ channel inhibition by Ras-GAP, suggesting that the antagonism by wild type Rap1A involves an interaction with GAP in the effector domain. The effectiveness of Rap1A to inhibit Ras-GAP is dependent upon the amount of Ras-GAP present in the assay and can also be overcome by the addition of GTP-bound N-Ras (GC-43), suggesting a competitive mechanism is operative. Finally, a truncated form of Ras-GAP (GAP32) which is no longer dependent upon Ras for inhibition of the M2-activated K+ channel is also no longer sensitive to blockade by added Rap1A. These data support the concept of GAP as an effector of Ras action and indicate that Rap1A can serve as an inhibitor of Ras action in a system distinct from cell transformation by a competitive mechanism involving the GAP binding domain of Rap1A.     

Direct activation of phospholipase C-epsilon by Rho

Unique among the phospholipase C isozymes, the recently identified phospholipase C-epsilon (PLC-epsilon) contains an amino-terminal CDC25 domain capable of catalyzing nucleotide exchange on Ras family GTPases as well as a tandem array of Ras-associating (RA) domains near its carboxyl terminus that are effector binding sites for activated H-Ras and Rap. To determine whether other small GTPases activate PLC-epsilon, we measured inositol phosphate accumulation in COS-7 cells expressing a broad range of GTPase-deficient mutants of Ras superfamily proteins. RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC all markedly stimulated inositol phosphate accumulation in PLC-epsilon-expressing cells. This stimulation matched or exceeded phospholipase activation promoted by co-expression of PLC-epsilon with the known regulators Ras, Galpha12/13, or Gbeta1gamma2. In contrast, little effect was observed with the other Rho family members Rac1, Rac2, Rac3, and Cdc42. Truncation of the two carboxyl-terminal RA domains caused loss of responsiveness to H-Ras but not to Rho. Truncation of PLC-epsilon to remove the CDC25 and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains also did not cause loss of responsiveness to Rho, Galpha12/13, or Gbeta1gamma2. Comparative sequence analysis of mammalian phospholipase C isozymes revealed a unique approximately 65 amino acid insert within the catalytic core of PLC-epsilon not present in PLC-beta, gamma, delta, or zeta. A PLC-epsilon construct lacking this region was no longer activated by Rho or Galpha12/13 but retained regulation by Gbetagamma and H-Ras. GTP-dependent interaction of Rho with PLC-epsilon was illustrated in pull-down experiments with GST-Rho, and this interaction was retained in the PLC-epsilon construct lacking the unique insert within the catalytic core. These results are consistent with the conclusion that Rho family GTPases directly interact with PLC-epsilon by a mechanism independent of the CDC25 or RA domains. A unique insert within the catalytic core of PLC-epsilon imparts responsiveness to Rho, which may signal downstream of Galpha12/13 in the regulation of PLC-epsilon, because activation by both Rho and Galpha12/13 is lost in the absence of this sequence.     

The PI3K effector Arap3 interacts with the PI(3,4,5)P3 phosphatase SHIP2 in a SAM domain-dependent manner

Arap3 is a phosphoinositide (PI) 3 kinase effector that serves as a GTPase activating protein (GAP) for both Arf and Rho G-proteins. The protein has multiple pleckstrin homology (PH) domains that bind preferentially phosphatidyl-inositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate (PI(3,4,5,)P3) to induce translocation of Arap3 to the plasma membrane upon PI3K activation. Arap3 also contains a Ras association (RA) domain that interacts with the small G-protein Rap1 and a sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain of unknown function. In a yeast two-hybrid screen for new interaction partners of Arap3, we identified the PI 5'-phosphatase SHIP2 as an interaction partner of Arap3. The interaction between Arap3 and SHIP2 was observed with endogenous proteins and shown to be mediated by the SAM domain of Arap3 and SHIP2. In vitro, these two domains show specificity for a heterodimeric interaction. Since it was shown previously that Arap3 has a higher affinity for PI(3,4,5,)P3 than for PI(3,4)P2, we propose that the SAM domain of Arap3 can function to recruit a negative regulator of PI3K signaling into the effector complex.     

The guanine nucleotide exchange factor CNrasGEF activates ras in response to cAMP and cGMP

Small GTPase proteins such as Ras are key regulators of cellular proliferation and are activated by guanine nucleotide exchange/releasing factors (GEFs/GRFs). Three classes of Ras GRFs have been identified to date, represented by Sos1/2, Ras-GRF1/2 and Ras-GRP. Here, we describe a novel candidate Ras activator, cyclic nucleotide rasGEF (CNrasGEF), which contains CDC25, Ras exchange motif (REM), Ras-association (RA), PDZ and cNMP (cAMP/cGMP) binding (cNMP-BD) domains, two PY motifs and a carboxy-terminal SxV sequence. CNrasGEF can activate Ras in vitro, and it binds cAMP directly via its cNMP-BD. In cells, CNrasGEF activates Ras in response to elevation of intracellular cAMP or cGMP, or treatment with their analogues 8-Br-cAMP or 8-Br-cGMP, independently of protein kinases A and G (PKA and PKG). This activation is prevented in CNrasGEF lacking its CDC25 domain or cNMP-BD. CNrasGEF can also activate the small GTPase Rap1 in cells, but this activation is constitutive and independent of cAMP. CNrasGEF is expressed mainly in the brain and is localized at the plasma membrane, a localization dependent on the presence of intact PDZ domain but not the SxV sequence. These results suggest that CNrasGEF may directly connect cAMP-generating pathways or cGMP-generating pathways to Ras.     

A Ral guanine exchange factor-Ral pathway is conserved in Drosophila melanogaster and sheds new light on the connectivity of the Ral, Ras, and Rap pathways

Ras GTPases are central to many physiological and pathological signaling pathways and act via a combination of effectors. In mammals, at least three Ral exchange factors (RalGEFs) contain a Ras association domain and constitute a discrete subgroup of Ras effectors. Despite their ability to bind activated Rap as well as activated Ras, they seem to act downstream of Ras but not downstream of Rap. We have revisited the Ras/Rap-Ral connections in Drosophila melanogaster by using iterative two-hybrid screens with these three GTPases as primary baits and a subsequent genetic approach. We show that (i) the Ral-centered protein network appears to be extremely conserved in human and flies, (ii) in this network, RGL is a functional Drosophila orthologue of RalGEFs, and (iii) the RGL-Ral pathway functionally interacts with both the Ras and Rap pathways. Our data do not support the paradigmatic model where Ral is in the effector pathway of Ras. They reveal a signaling circuitry where Ral is functionally downstream of the Rap GTPase, at odds with the pathways described for mammalian cell lines. Thus, in vivo data show variations in the connectivity of pathways described for cell lines which might display only a subset of the biological possibilities.