Renin concentrations and effects of propranolol and spironolactone in patients with hypertension.

In a crossover study 32 patients with hypertension were randomly allocated to treatment with spironolactone 200 mg/day for two months, propranolol 320 mg/day for two months, and a combination of both drugs at half the dose. Between the treatments placebo was given for two months. Both spironolactone and propranolol lowered the blood pressure significantly in both positions. The initial plasma renin activity (PRA) levels ranged from 0-4 to 5-0 mug angiotensin I l-1 h-1, and there was a close correlation between these levels and the effects of the drugs: with increasing PRA the response to propranolol was better while the opposite was true for spironolactone. Spironolactone reduced the blood pressure more at eight than at four weeks, while no such difference could be shown for propranolol. Spironolactone and propranolol together decreased the blood pressure still further irrespective of the initial PRA. All patients achieved a normal supine blood pressure.     

Treatment of Hypertension with Propranolol

When used in the treatment of hypertension propranolol is at least of similar potency to bethanidine, guanethidine, and methyldopa. Propranolol does not produce postural or exercise hypotension and it seems that it is often more acceptable to patients than conventional drugs. It usually produces the best control of the supine blood pressure.A series of 109 hypertensive patients was treated with propranolol; in nine the drug was withdrawn. In 92 of the patients a supine or standing blood pressure of 100 mm. Hg or less was achieved. Eighty of the patients had previously been treated with other potent drugs, and close comparisons and prolonged follow-up in 17 patients showed that diastolic pressures of 100 mm. Hg or less were achieved in more patients after propranolol than with guanethidine, bethanidine, or methyldopa.Sensitivity to propranolol varies widely, and dosage should be increased gradually. The hypotensive effect often takes six to eight weeks to reach its maximum. Propranolol reduces cardiac output but may also act by reducing the cardiac component of pressor stimuli; as a result the baroreceptors gradually regulate the blood pressure at a lower level. It is contraindicated in patients with obstructive airways disease or in uncompensated heart failure.     

Effect of various beta-adrenolytic drugs on heart rate and changes in left-ventricular systolic time intervals in patients with hyperthyroidism and simple goiter

The effects of a short-term application of various beta-adrenolytic drugs on heart rate and on the changes in subperiods of left ventricle contraction have been studied in 71 patients with untreated hyperthyroidism and in 72 patients with simple goiter. The following drugs were used: propranolol, metoprolol, atenolol, pindolol, nadolol and acebutolol. It was found that those betaadrenolytic drugs which have no sympathomimetic action cause a significant decrease in heart rate both in patients with hyperthyroidism and in those with simple goiter. The effect of these drugs on heart rate was not related to the changes in blood serum concentrations of thyroxine and triiodothyronine. None of the drugs tested influenced appreciably the contraction subperiods of left heart ventricle, both in the patients with hyperthyroidism and in those with simple goiter.     

Attenuation of hypotensive effect of propranolol and thiazide diuretics by indomethacin.

The effects of 100 mg indomethacin daily for three weeks on blood pressure and urinary excretion of prostaglandin F2 alpha were studied in a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of two groups of patients with essential hypertension, eight receiving propranolol and seven thiazide diuretics. Compared with placebo, adding indomethacin to the patients'' established antihypertensive treatment increased blood pressure by 14/5 Hg supine and 16/9 mm Hg erect in the patients receiving propranolol, and by 13/9 mm Hg supine and 16/9 mm Hg erect in the patients receiving thiazide diuretics (all p less than or equal to 0.05). The excretion of the major urinary metabolite of prostaglandin F2 alpha was reduced by 67% in the propranolol-treated patients and by 57% in those receiving a thiazide diuretic. Body weight increased by 0 . 8 kg (propranolol) and 1 . 1 kg (thiazide diuretic) when indomethacin was given, but there were no significant changes in creatinine clearance, urinary sodium excretion, or packed cell volume in either treatment group. These results suggest that products formed by the arachidonic acid cyclo-oxygenase contribute to the regulation of blood pressure during treatment with both propranolol and thiazide diuretics. Inhibition of the cyclo-oxygenase with indomethacin partially antagonises the hypotensive effect of these drugs.     

Ambulatory blood pressure during once-daily randomised double-blind administration of atenolol,metoprolol, pindolol,and slow-release propranolol

Intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure was measured over 24 hours, in 34 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, both before and after double-blind randomisation to treatment with atenolol (n=9), metoprolol (n=9), pindolol (n=9), or propranolol in its slow-release form (n=7). The dosage of each drug was adjusted at monthly clinic visits until satisfactory control of blood pressure was achieved (140/90 mm Hg or less by cuff) or the maximum dose in the study protocol was reached. A second intra-arterial recording was made after these drugs had been taken once daily at 0800 for three to eight months (mean 5·0±SD 1·4) and was started four hours after the last dose.At the end of the 24-hour recordings blood pressure was significantly lower with all four drugs. The extent to which the drugs reduced blood pressure, however, differed over the 24 hours. Atenolol lowered mean arterial pressure significantly throughout all 24 recorded hours, metoprolol for 12 hours, pindolol for 15 hours, and slow-release propranolol for 22 hours. Neither metoprolol nor pindolol lowered blood pressure during sleep. A significant reduction in heart rate was observed over 20 hours with atenolol, 20 hours with metoprolol, 10 hours with pindolol, and 24 hours with slow-release propranolol. Atenolol, metoprolol, and slow-release propranolol continued to slow the heart rate 24 hours after the last tablet was taken; this effect on heart rate, however, was not sustained throughout the second morning in those patients taking atenolol. Pindolol, the only drug studied that has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, increased heart rate and did not lower blood pressure during sleep.Atenolol and slow-release propranolol are effective as antihypertensive agents over 24 hours when taken once daily, whereas metoprolol and pindolol may need to be taken more frequently. At times of low sympathetic tone, however, such as during sleep, beta-blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity may raise heart rate and attenuate the fall in blood pressure with treatment.     

Effect of various beta-adrenolytic drugs and calcium channel blocker (nifedipine) on selected indicators of calcium-phosphorus metabolism in patients with hyperthyroidism and simple goiter

The study was aimed at evaluation of the effect of short-term treatment with one of the six beta adrenolytic drugs (propranolol, metoprolol, atenolol, pindolol, nadolol, acebutolol) and calcium antagonist nifedipine on the values of several parameters of calcium-phosphorus metabolism in 81 patients with hyperthyroidism (14 patients with Graves' disease, and 67 patients with toxic nodular goiter), and 82 patients with simple goiter. The patients studied have been divided into seven groups, each receiving one of the investigated drugs during four days. A significant decrease in the urinary excretion of hydroxyproline was found only in the patients with hyperthyroidism receiving propranolol. This effect of propranolol on hydroxyprolinuria was not related to the degree of lowering of serum T3 concentration observed in these patients.     

Effects of antihypertensive agents on blood velocity: implications for atherogenesis.

Heart rate and blood velocity are major determinants of flow disturbances at arterial bifurcations. Since endothelial damage due to flow disturbances is thought to be significant in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, the effects of drugs on these parameters have to be considered in the selection of medications to prevent atherosclerosis. To determine the effects of antihypertensive drugs on heart rate and blood velocity 15 patients with hypertension were treated with placebo, hydrochlorothiazide, nadolol, propranolol and hydralazine in sequence. The doses given produced significant changes in heart rate and blood pressure, and Doppler ultrasonographic recording of aortic blood velocity showed that there were significant changes in peak blood velocity. Nadolol and propranolol produced significantly lower values of heart rate x blood velocity than placebo, hydralazine and hydrochlorothiazide.     

Comparative effectiveness of carvedilol and propranolol on glycemic control and insulin resistance associated with L-thyroxin-induced hyperthyroidism--an experimental study

The present study was undertaken to investigate the effectiveness of adrenergic antagonists carvedilol and propranolol on L-thyroxin-induced cardiovascular and metabolic disturbances in rats. Treatment with L-thyroxin sodium (75 mg/kg body mass, s.c., every alternate day for 3 weeks), produced a significant increase in food and water intake, body temperature, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, along with an increase in serum T3, T4, and triglyceride levels. Besides a significant reduction in body mass, serum levels of TSH and cholesterol were also reduced following L-thyroxin treatment. Carvedilol (10 mg/kg body mass, orally) and propranolol (10 mg/kg body mass, i.p.) administered daily in the third week to 2 separate groups of L-thyroxin-treated animals reversed thyroxin-induced loss in body mass and rise in body temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate. Propranolol treatment increased TSH levels and decreased T3 and T4 levels in hyperthyroid animals, whereas carvedilol did not produce any effect on thyroid hormones. Carvedilol treatment reversed thyroxin induced hypertriglyceridemia, whereas propranolol treatment had no effect. Both carvedilol and propranolol prevented decrease in cholesterol levels induced by thyroxine. Compared with normal animals, L-thyroxin-treated animals showed a state of hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinaemia, impaired glucose tolerance, and insulin resistance, as inferred from elevated fasting serum glucose and insulin levels, higher area under the curve over 120 min for glucose, and decreased insulin sensitivity index (KITT). Propranolol and carvedilol treatment significantly decreased fasting serum glucose levels. Treatment with propranolol did not alter serum insulin levels, area-under-the-curve glucose, or KITT values. However, treatment with carvedilol significantly reduced area-under-the-curve glucose, decreased fasting serum insulin levels and significantly increased KITT values. In conclusion, carvedilol appears to produce favorable effects on insulin sensitivity and glycemic control and can therefore be considered as more efficacious adjunctive treatment than propranolol in hyperthyroidism.     

Captopril in essential hypertension; contrasting effects of adding hydrochlorothiazide or propranolol.

Twenty-four patients with moderate to severe hypertension were treated for four weeks with captopril, an oral inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme. The fall in blood pressure with captopril alone correlated with pretreatment plasma renin activity. The effect of adding either hydrochlorothiazide or propranolol to the captopril treatment was then studied. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide to captopril produced a dose-dependent fall in blood pressure. At the higher dose of the diuretic this fall in blood pressure correlated with weight loss, suggesting that when the diuretic-induced compensatory rise in angiotensin II is prevented by captopril the fall in blood pressure becomes dependent on loss of sodium and water. In contrast, the addition of propranolol to captopril produced no further fall in blood pressure, suggesting that inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme prevents the blood pressure lowering effect of propranolol. This may have implications for the mechanism whereby beta-blockers alone lower blood pressure. These contrasting effects of hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol in the presence of captopril indicate that in patients whose hypertension is not controlled by captopril alone the addition of increasing doses of diuretic is likely to control the blood pressure. The addition of a beta-blocker, however, is less likely to be effective.     

Effects of propranolol and metoprolol on the peripheral circulation.

The effects of single doses of propranolol and metoprolol on skin temperature and skin and muscle blood flow were compared in 10 normal subjects and four patients with essential hypertension. In normal subjects the mean skin temperature fell by 1.30 +/- 0.62 degrees C 90 minutes after 80 mg propranolol and 0.15 +/- 0.05 degrees C after 100 mg metoprolol. Skin blood flow and resting muscle blood flow were not affected by metoprolol but fell significantly after propranolol. Both drugs reduced post-exercise muscle hyperaemia, propranolol by more than metoprolol. Similar changes were seen in the hypertensive patients. Propranolol should be used with care in patients with known vascular disease.     

The influence of propranolol on the hypotensive action of ketanserin in normotensive rats

In normotensive rats the effect of different doses of propranolol (1.0, 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg i.p.) and ketanserin (10.0 mg/kg p.o.) on mean blood pressure and heart rate and on cardiovascular response to noradrenaline (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 1.0 micrograms/kg i.v.) was examined. The drugs were given separately or together. Propranolol slightly reduced the hypotensive effect of ketanserin. On the other hand a decrease in heart rate caused by propranolol was not affected by ketanserin. Our results show that propranolol given with ketanserin did not change the effect of the latter on the cardiovascular system.     

Effect of nifedipine and propranolol on blood flow,venous compliance and blood pressure in essential hypertension

To determine the efficacy of nifedipine combined with propranolol in the treatment of hypertension, 23 patients with essential hypertension uncontrolled while they were receiving propranolol, 120 mg/d, entered a dose response trial of four 8-week periods while continuing propranolol therapy. Therapy during the four periods consisted respectively of a placebo, 30 mg/d of nifedipine, 30 or 60 mg/d of nifedipine, and 30 or 60 mg/d of nifedipine along with only 60 mg/d of propranolol. Studies of forearm blood flow and venous compliance were carried out in nine of the patients. Ten patients dropped out after the first period. The mean blood pressures while the patients were recumbent after the first, second and third periods were 163 ± 17/100 ± 6, 147 ± 13/89 ± 10 and 141 ± 19/84 ± 10 mm Hg respectively. There was no evidence of tolerance in the four patients who received 30 mg/d of nifedipine during the third period. There was a significant dose-diastolic pressure response (p < 0.0006) without a change in heart rate in the eight who received 60 mg/d of nifedipine during this period. After 16 weeks of therapy with nifedipine 11 patients had a diastolic pressure less than 90 mm Hg while recumbent. While mean blood pressure and heart rate for the group were not significantly increased at the end of the fourth period, in three of the patients the diastolic pressure while recumbent increased to over 90 mm Hg. This suggests that 120 mg/d of propranolol is the minimum dose required for concomitant therapy. Adverse symptoms were mild and transient. Forearm plethysmography showed that nifedipine induced arteriolar but not venous dilation and that propranolol attenuated the vasodilator effect of nifedipine. The author concludes that nifedipine was safe and effective in combination with propranolol in this group of patients with essential hypertension.     

Effect of chronic administration of propranolol on the blood pressure and heart weight in experimental renal hypertension.

Chronic administration of propranolol did not alter the course of severe renal hypertension in the rat. Twenty and forty days after the induction of hypertension, blood pressure, ventricular weight and plasma renin concentration were determined. On day forty, at equivalent levels of blood pressure, the ventricular and the ventricular/body weight ratio was significantly lower in the propranolol treated group (18.6%; 22.9%). It is suggested that propranolol may mitigate the cardiac hypertrophy associated with hypertension. This effect is independent of the blood pressure.     

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry for quantitative determination of β-blocker drugs in one-drop of human serum sample

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) has been applied for the quantitative determination of β-blocker drugs in one-drop of human serum samples using drop-to-drop solvent microextraction (DDSME) as a preconcentrating probe. The optimum experimental conditions for β-blocker drugs were investigated and 1.8 μL volume of toluene for 10 min extraction time with the 5% addition of NaCl under pH 11.0 was found to be the best conditions for the separation and preconcentration of drugs from 30 μL of serum sample from a patient with high blood pressure. The optimized methodologies for DDSME/MALDI-MS analyses exhibited a good linearity with intra- and inter day precision value of 8.5-10.5% and 9.4-12.6%, respectively. The proposed DDSME/MALDI-MS offers a very simple, rapid and low-cost technique for the determination of β-blocker drugs in one drop of serum sample. The reported method has been successfully applied for the determination of propranolol and nadolol in small volume of serum sample from patient suffering from high blood pressure. In future, this technique could be applied for pharmacokinetic and clinical studies.     

Controlled Trial of Propranolol in Hypertension

A trial of oral propranolol as a hypotensive agent was designed to provide adequate treatment periods. Twenty-eight patients with essential hypertension, with a mean blood pressure of 190/111 mm. Hg, were controlled on 120-320 mg. of propranolol daily. Their mean treated blood pressure was 153/91. They then entered, on a randomized and double-blind basis, a cross-over trial of two 16-week periods, blood pressure being measured fortnightly. Propranolol caused a statistically significant fall in blood pressure when compared with placebo. When propranolol was withdrawn blood pressures rapidly rose to hypertensive levels, though not to untreated levels. No postural hypotension was found, but a small change in blood pressure levels on exercise was noted.     

Influence of quinidine and propranolol on the intracellular distribution of 45Ca in rat heart.

The intracellular distribution of 45Ca in the rat heart was studied following separate and combined administration of quinidine and propranolol. Both drugs caused an increased uptake of 45Ca in the nuclear-cell membrane fraction but quinidine suppressed the uptake in mitochondrial and microsomal fractions whereas propranolol did not affect the uptake of 45Ca in these fractions. In addition, there was an increase in serum radioactivity noted with quinidine which was not observed with propranolol. Combined treatment resulted in restoration of normal values for blood and mitochondrial fractions and an increased uptake of 45Ca in the microsomal fraction.     

Comparison of propranolol,metoprolol, and acebutolol on insulin-induced hypoglycaemia.

Metoprolol and acebutolol, two supposedly cardio-selective beta-adrenergic recptor blocking agents, were tested in healthy volunteers against propranolol, a non-selective drug, for their effect on blood glucose levels during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. There was not significant difference between propranolol and metoprolol, which both potentiated the initial hypoglycaemic action of the insulin and delayed the return to normoglycaemia. Acebutolol, even though potentiating the initial hypoglycaemia, did not possess a significant delaying effect. A similar trial should be undertaken in diabetics to determine with certainty the safety of such drugs in diabetes mellitus.     

Effect of meal and propranolol on whole body and splanchnic oxygen consumption in patients with cirrhosis

Our aim was to measure whole body energy expenditure after a mixed liquid meal, with and without simultaneous propranolol infusion, in patients with cirrhosis. We also wanted to investigate the effect of propranolol on substrate fluxes and oxygen uptake in the tissues drained by the hepatic vein and azygos vein in the postprandial period in these patients. Whole-body oxygen uptake, hepatic blood flow, hepatic venous pressure gradient and net-hepatic fluxes of oxygen, lactate, glucose, glycerol, and free fatty acids (FFA) were measured in 12 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis before and for 2 h after ingestion of a mixed liquid meal (700 kcal). Half of the patients (n = 6) were randomized to a treatment group receiving intravenous infusion of propranolol in combination with the meal. The meal-induced energy expenditure was significantly lower in patients given propranolol [15.0 +/- 18.9 vs. 67.0 +/- 26.1 kJ/120 min (means +/- SD), P < 0.01]. Meal-induced whole body oxygen uptake was lower in patients receiving propranolol (19.2 +/- 38 vs. 135.7 +/- 61 mmol/120 min, P < 0.01), and the meal-induced increase in splanchnic oxygen uptake was nonexistent when propranolol was administered in combination (-13.2 +/- 34.8 vs. 110.4 +/- 34.8 mmol/120 min, P = 0.04). Postprandially, the propranolol group had a tendency toward a reduced splanchnic glucose output, and the FFA uptake was significantly reduced. Propranolol reduces meal-induced whole body oxygen uptake and energy expenditure as well as splanchnic oxygen uptake. The splanchnic reduction in oxygen consumption can explain almost the entire reduction in whole body oxygen consumption.     

Possible role of an endogenous opioid in the antihypertensive action of propranolol in spontaneously hypertensive rats

The effect on systolic blood pressure and heart rate of the acute and chronic intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of d- and dl-propranolol was investigated on unanesthetised spontaneously hypertensive rats. The effect of naloxone on the propranolol induced hypotension was also studied to test the hypothesis that the antihypertensive effect of propranolol involves the release of an endogenous opiate. On i.p. administration, 3 mg/kg d-propranolol was inactive; 3 and 30 mg/kg dl-propranolol decreased blood pressure and heart rate in a dose-dependent manner. When the rats were pretreated with 2 mg/kg naloxone i.p., the effect of propranolol on the blood pressure was nearly completely abolished, while that on the heart rate was only partially blocked. Chronic administration of dl-propranolol (30 mg/kg b.i.d.) to spontaneously hypertensive rats from the age of 6 weeks (prehypertensive phase) for 29 days prevented the development of hypertension while the rats treated with physiological saline for 29 days (control group) developed hypertension. Naloxone (2 mg/kg i.p.) administered on the 29th day to chronically treated rats induced a reversal of the propranolol action on systolic blood pressure and heart rate, i.e., blood pressure and heart rate increased. Naloxone had no such effect in the control group. We suggest that the release of an endogenous opioid contributes to the acute and chronic antihypertensive action of i.p. propranolol in spontaneously hypertensive rats and that the secretion of endogenous opioids participating in the control of cardiovascular functions is influenced by adrenergic mechanisms.     

Beta-adrenoreceptor blockade in the conscious rabbit: effects on plasma renin activity and blood pressure.

The administration of a single dose of dl-propranolol, 1 mg/kg i.v., in the conscious unstimulated rabbit produced effective beta-adrenoreceptor blockade (inhibition of isoprenaline tachycardia) for 150 min. During this period there was a positive correlation between plasma concentrations of propranolol and the degree of beta-blockade observed. In a further group of animals treated with propranolol, plasma renin activity (PRA) fell to 50% of control (P < 0.001) within 60 min, the rate of change of PRA also correlating with plasma propranolol levels. Similarly, there were reductions in mean blood pressure (P < 0.025) and heart rate (P < 0.025). Statistical relationships between the fall in blood pressure and either pre-treatment PRA or the change in PRA were consistent with the hypothesis that the hypotensive effect of propranolol was dependent upon its suppression of renin release. However, an alternative possibility that the fall in blood pressure was due to an acute reduction in cardiac output could not be excluded.