Retrotransposition of Nonviral RNAs in an Avian Packaging Cell Line

Retroviruses produced from the quail packaging cell line SE21Q1b predominantly contain cellular RNAs instead of viral RNAs. These RNAs can be reverse transcribed and integrated into the genomes of newly infected cells and are thereafter referred to as newly formed retrogenes. We investigated whether retrogene formation can occur within SE21Q1b cells themselves and whether this occurs intracellularly or via extracellular reinfection. By using packaging cell line mutants derived from the SE21Q1b provirus and selectable reporter constructs, we found that the process requires envelope glycoproteins and a retroviral packaging signal. Our results suggest that extracellular reinfection is the primary route of retrotransposition of nonviral RNAs.     

A defective retrovirus particle (SE21Q1b) packages and reverse transcribes cellular RNA, utilizing tRNA-like primers.

Linial and co-workers described a quail cell line, SE21Q1b, transformed by a single provirus of Rous sarcoma virus that is defective in virus assembly, in as much as the virus particles produced, SE21, contain cellular rather than viral RNA. In other respects these particles are normal, and the amount of endogenous DNA synthesis by disrupted virus particles is comparable to that of normal virus. We now report that endogenous DNA synthesis by SE21 virions uses RNA primers of the same size as tRNA species and that about 17% of these are bound to polyadenylate-containing RNA templates. Previous studies have shown that with wild-type Rous sarcoma virus, DNA synthesis is exclusively initiated on a tRNATrp species base paired to a specific location on the viral RNA. In contrast, we interpreted our data with SE21 as evidence that many different tRNA-primed initiations occurred, that predominantly species other than tRNATrp were used, and that the base pairing between template and primer RNAs included significant nucleotide mismatching. A subpopulation of the DNA synthesized by SE21 virions from tRNA-like primers was both initiated and terminated at discrete locations. These species are therefore analogous to the strong-stop DNA synthesized by wild-type virus.     

Transfer of defective avian tumor virus genomes by a Rous sarcoma virus RNA packaging mutant.

SE21Q1b, a Rous sarcoma virus mutant which packages cellular rather than viral RNA, is competent for infection of quail cells and can transmit defective transforming retrovirus genes. Stably transformed recipient clones have been obtained by using this mutant.     

Context-Dependent Phenotype of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid Mutation

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) nucleocapsid mutation R10A/K11A abolishes viral replication when present in proviral clone HIV-1(HXB-2), but it was found to have minimal effect on replication of the closely related HIV-1(NL4-3). Functional mapping demonstrated that a nonconservative amino acid change at nucleocapsid residue 24 (threonine in HIV-1(HXB-2), isoleucine in HIV-1(NL4-3)) is the major determinant of the different R10A/K11A phenotypes in these two proviruses. Threonine-isoleucine exchanges appear to modify the R10A/K11A phenotype via effects on virion RNA-packaging efficiency. The improved packaging seen with hydrophobic isoleucine is consistent with solution structures localizing this residue to a hydrophobic pocket that contacts guanosine bases in viral genomic RNA stem-loops critical for packaging.     

Charged amino acid residues of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid p7 protein involved in RNA packaging and infectivity.

Interaction of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag precursor polyprotein (Pr55Gag) with the viral genomic RNA is required for retroviral replication. Mutations that reduce RNA packaging efficiency have been localized to the highly basic nucleocapsid (NC) p7 domain of Pr55Gag, but the importance of the basic amino acid residues in specific viral RNA encapsidation and infectivity has not been thoroughly investigated in vivo. We have systematically substituted the positively charged residues of the NC domain of Pr55Gag in an HIV-1 viral clone by using alanine scanning mutagenesis and have assayed the effects of these mutations on virus replication, particle formation, and RNA packaging in vivo. Analysis of viral clones with single substitutions revealed that certain charged amino acid residues are more critical for RNA packaging efficiency and infectivity than others. Analysis of viral clones with multiple substitutions indicates that the presence of positive charge in each of three independent domains--the zinc-binding domains, the basic region that links them, and the residues that Hank the two zinc-binding domains--is necessary for efficient HIV-1 RNA packaging. Finally, we note that some mutations affect virus replication more drastically than RNA incorporation, providing in vivo evidence for the hypothesis that NC p7 may be involved in aspects of the HIV life cycle in addition to RNA packaging.     

Role of sindbis virus capsid protein region II in nucleocapsid core assembly and encapsidation of genomic RNA

Sindbis virus is an enveloped positive-sense RNA virus in the alphavirus genus. The nucleocapsid core contains the genomic RNA surrounded by 240 copies of a single capsid protein. The capsid protein is multifunctional, and its roles include acting as a protease, controlling the specificity of RNA that is encapsidated into nucleocapsid cores, and interacting with viral glycoproteins to promote the budding of mature virus and the release of the genomic RNA into the newly infected cell. The region comprising amino acids 81 to 113 was previously implicated in two processes, the encapsidation of the viral genomic RNA and the stable accumulation of nucleocapsid cores in the cytoplasm of infected cells. In the present study, specific amino acids within this region responsible for the encapsidation of the genomic RNA have been identified. The region that is responsible for nucleocapsid core accumulation has considerable overlap with the region that controls encapsidation specificity.     

Packaging signals in alphaviruses.

Alphaviruses synthesize large amounts of both genomic and subgenomic RNA in infected cells, but usually only the genomic RNA is packaged. This implies the existence of an encapsidation or packaging signal which would be responsible for selectivity. Previously, we had identified a region of the Sindbis virus genome that interacts specifically with the viral capsid protein. This 132-nucleotide (nt) fragment lies within the coding region of the nsP1 gene (nt 945 to 1076). We proposed that the 132-mer is important for capsid recognition and initiates the formation of the viral nucleocapsid. To study the encapsidation of Sindbis virus RNAs in infected cells, we designed a new assay that uses the self-replicating Sindbis virus genomes (replicons) which lack the viral structural protein genes and contain heterologous sequences under the control of the subgenomic RNA promoter. These replicons can be packaged into viral particles by using defective helper RNAs that contain the structural protein genes (P. Bredenbeek, I. Frolov, C. M. Rice, and S. Schlesinger, J. Virol. 67:6439-6446, 1993). Insertion of the 132-mer into the subgenomic RNA significantly increased the packaging of this RNA into viral particles. We have used this assay and defective helpers that contain the structural protein genes of Ross River virus (RRV) to investigate the location of the encapsidation signal in the RRV genome. Our results show that there are several fragments that could act as packaging signals. They are all located in a different region of the genome than the signal for the Sindbis virus genome. For RRV, the strongest packaging signal lies between nt 2761 and 3062 in the nsP2 gene. This is the same region that was proposed to contain the packaging signal for Semliki Forest virus genomic RNA.     

Role of the gag polyprotein precursor in packaging and maturation of Rous sarcoma virus genomic RNA.

Rous sarcoma virus nucleocapsid protein (NC) has been shown by site-directed mutagenesis to be involved in viral RNA packaging and in the subsequent maturation of genomic RNA in the progeny viral particles. To investigate whether NC exerts these activities as a free protein or as a domain of the polyprotein precursor Pr76gag, we have constructed several mutants unable to process Pr76gag and analyzed their properties in a transient-transfection assay of chicken embryo fibroblasts, the natural host of Rous sarcoma virus. A point mutation in the protease (PR) active site completely prevents Pr76gag processing. The full-length Pr76gag polyprotein is still able to package viral RNA, but cannot mature it. A shorter gag precursor polyprotein lacking the C-terminal PR domain, but retaining that of the NC protein, is however, unable even to package viral RNA. This indicates that the NC protein can participate in packaging viral RNA only as part of a full-length Pr76gag and that the PR domain is, indirectly or directly, also involved in RNA packaging. These results also demonstrate that processing of Pr76gag is necessary for viral RNA dimerization.     

Frequent segregation of more-defective variants from a Rous sarcoma virus packaging mutant, TK15.

TK15, a mutant derived from a temperature-sensitive mutant of Rous sarcoma virus (tsNY68), has extremely low infectivity although it has intact viral genes. Previous analyses of the virus and virus-induced transformants showed that the mutant has a defect in packaging of its own genomic RNA, possibly owing to a deletion near the 5' end. Another striking feature of TK15 is that it induces various types of virus-nonproducing (NP) transformants, 15c(-), at high frequency. In this work, the mechanisms of frequent segregation of NP cells were examined by molecular cloning of TK15-derived proviruses from NP cell clones and their sequence analysis. The structure of the major type of provirus, found in about half of the NP cell clones, was colinear with src subgenomic mRNA and was suggested to be due to infection with virions containing subgenomic mRNA in place of genomic RNA. Other types of proviruses present in 15c(-) cells appeared to contain cellular sequences of various lengths replacing various parts of viral sequences. The mechanism for the generation of these proviruses is discussed in relation to the nature of the packaging mutant.     

Human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 differ in the predominant mechanism used for selection of genomic RNA for encapsidation

Retroviral RNA encapsidation is a highly selective process mediated through recognition by the viral Gag proteins of cis-acting RNA packaging signals in genomic RNA. This RNA species is also translated, producing the viral gag gene products. The relationship between these processes is poorly understood. Unlike that of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the dominant packaging signal of HIV-2 is upstream of the major splice donor and present in both unspliced and spliced viral RNAs, necessitating additional mechanisms for preferential packaging of unspliced genomic RNA. Encapsidation studies of a series of HIV-2-based vectors showed efficient packaging of viral genomes only if the unspliced, encapsidated RNA expressed full-length Gag protein, including functional nucleocapsid. We propose a novel encapsidation initiation mechanism, providing selectivity, in which unspliced HIV-2 RNA is captured in cis by the Gag protein. This has implications for the use of HIV-2 and other lentiviruses as vectors.     

Identification of a region in the Sindbis virus nucleocapsid protein that is involved in specificity of RNA encapsidation.

The specific encapsidation of genomic RNA by an alphavirus requires recognition of the viral RNA by the nucleocapsid protein. In an effort to identify individual residues of the Sindbis virus nucleocapsid protein which are essential for this recognition event, a molecular genetic analysis of a domain of the protein previously suggested to be involved in RNA binding in vitro was undertaken. The experiments presented describe the generation of a panel of viruses which contain mutations in residues 97 through 111 of the nucleocapsid protein. All of the viruses generated were viable, and the results suggest that, individually, the residues mutated do not play a critical role in encapsidation. However, one mutant which had lost the ability to specifically encapsidate the genomic RNA was identified. This mutant virus, which contained a deletion of residues 97 to 106, encapsidated both the genomic RNA and the subgenomic mRNA of the virus. It is proposed that the encapsidation of this second species of RNA, which is not present in wild-type virions, is the result of the loss of a domain of the nucleocapsid protein required for specific recognition of the genomic RNA packaging signal. The results suggest that this region of the protein is important in dictating specificity in the encapsidation reaction in vivo. The isolation and preliminary characterization of two independent second-site revertants to this deletion mutant are also described.