Mechanism of the chemical step for the guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis catalyzed by elongation factor Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), the protein responsible for delivering aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNAs) to ribosomal A site during translation, belongs to the group of guanosine-nucleotide (GTP/GDP) binding proteins. Its active 'on'-state corresponds to the GTP-bound form, while the inactive 'off'-state corresponds to the GDP-bound form. In this work we focus on the chemical step, GTP+H(2)O-->GDP+Pi, of the hydrolysis mechanism. We apply molecular modeling tools including molecular dynamics simulations and the combined quantum mechanical-molecular mechanical calculations for estimates of reaction energy profiles for two possible arrangements of switch II regions of EF-Tu. In the first case we presumably mimic binding of the ternary complex EF-Tu.GTP.aa-tRNA to the ribosome and allow the histidine (His85) side chain of the protein to approach the reaction active site. In the second case, corresponding to the GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu alone, the side chain of His85 stays away from the active site, and the chemical reaction GTP+H(2)O-->GDP+Pi proceeds without participation of the histidine but through water molecules. In agreement with the experimental observations which distinguish rate constants for the fast chemical reaction in EF-Tu.GTP.aa-tRNA.ribosome and the slow spontaneous GTP hydrolysis in EF-Tu, we show that the activation energy barrier for the first scenario is considerably lower compared to that of the second case.     

Functional role of the sarcin-ricin loop of the 23S rRNA in the elongation cycle of protein synthesis

The sarcin-ricin loop (SRL) is one of the longest conserved sequences in the 23S ribosomal RNA. The SRL has been accepted as crucial for the activity of the ribosome because it is targeted by cytotoxins such as α-sarcin and ricin that completely abolish translation. Nevertheless, the precise functional role of the SRL in translation is not known. Recent biochemical and structural studies indicate that the SRL is critical for triggering GTP hydrolysis on elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and elongation factor G (EF-G). To determine the functional role of the SRL in the elongation stage of protein synthesis, we analyzed mutations in the SRL that are known to abolish protein synthesis and are lethal to cells. Here, we show that the SRL is not critical for GTP hydrolysis on EF-Tu and EF-G. The SRL also is not essential for peptide bond formation. Our results, instead, suggest that the SRL is crucial for anchoring EF-G on the ribosome during mRNA-tRNA translocation.     

Mechanism of activation of elongation factor Tu by ribosome: Catalytic histidine activates GTP by protonation

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is central to prokaryotic protein synthesis as it has the role of delivering amino-acylated tRNAs to the ribosome. Release of EF-Tu, after correct binding of the EF-Tu:aa-tRNA complex to the ribosome, is initiated by GTP hydrolysis. This reaction, whose mechanism is uncertain, is catalyzed by EF-Tu, but requires activation by the ribosome. There have been a number of mechanistic proposals, including those spurred by a recent X-ray crystallographic analysis of a ribosome:EF-Tu:aa-tRNA:GTP-analog complex. In this work, we have investigated these and alternative hypotheses, using high-level quantum chemical/molecular mechanical simulations for the wild-type protein and its His85Gln mutant. For both proteins, we find previously unsuggested mechanisms as being preferred, in which residue 85, either His or Gln, directly assists in the reaction. Analysis shows that the RNA has a minor catalytic effect in the wild-type reaction, but plays a significant role in the mutant by greatly stabilizing the reaction’s transition state. Given the similarity between EF-Tu and other members of the translational G-protein family, it is likely that these mechanisms of ribosome-activated GTP hydrolysis are pertinent to all of these proteins.     

The reaction of ribosomes with elongation factor Tu.GTP complexes. Aminoacyl-tRNA-independent reactions in the elongation cycle determine the accuracy of protein synthesis

The fidelity of protein synthesis depends on the rate constants for the reaction of ribosomes with ternary complexes of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), GTP, and aminoacyl (aa)-tRNA. By measuring the rate constants for the reaction of poly(U)-programmed ribosomes with a binary complex of elongation factor (EF-Tu) and GTP we have shown that two of the key rate constants in the former reaction are determined exclusively by ribosome-EF-Tu interactions and are not affected by the aa-tRNA. These are the rate constant for GTP hydrolysis, which plays an important role in the fidelity of ternary complex selection by the ribosome, and the rate constant for EF-Tu.GDP dissociation from the ribosome, which plays an equally important role in subsequent proofreading of the aa-tRNA. We conclude that the fidelities of ternary complex selection and proofreading are fundamentally dependent on ribosome-EF-Tu interactions. These interactions determine the absolute value of the rate constants for GTP hydrolysis and EF-Tu.GDP dissociation. The ribosome then uses these rate constants as internal standards to measure, respectively, the rate constants for ternary complex and aa-tRNA dissociation from the ribosome. These rates, in turn, are highly dependent on whether the ternary complex and aa-tRNA are cognate or near-cognate to the codon being translated.     

Substitution of histidine-84 and the GTPase mechanism of elongation factor Tu

Mutation of His84, a residue situated in one of the loops forming the guanine nucleotide binding pocket, was introduced in the G domain, the isolated N-terminal half molecule of bacterial elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), in order to investigate the role of this residue on the basic activities of EF-Tu: the interaction with GDP and GTP and the hydrolysis of GTP. Substitution of His84 by Gly reduces the GTPase activity of the G domain to 5%; this activity can still be stimulated by raising the KCl concentration as the activity of wild-type G domain or the intact molecule. Since the affinities of the mutant protein for GDP and GTP are essentially the same as those of the wild-type G domain, His84 is apparently not involved in the binding of the substrates. Calculations of the change in free energy of activation of the GTPase reaction following substitution of His84 by Gly point to the disruption of a weak hydrogen bond, involved in the catalytic reaction. This probably concerns an interaction via a water molecule. The possible mechanism underlying the GTPase reaction is discussed in light of the three-dimensional structure of EF-Tu, taking into account the situation of Ha-ras p21.     

An unusual mechanism for EF-Tu activation during tmRNA-mediated ribosome rescue

In bacteria, ribosomes stalled on truncated mRNAs are rescued by transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) and its protein partner SmpB. Acting like tRNA, the aminoacyl-tmRNA/SmpB complex is delivered to the ribosomal A site by EF-Tu and accepts the transfer of the nascent polypeptide. Although SmpB binding within the decoding center is clearly critical for licensing tmRNA entry into the ribosome, it is not known how activation of EF-Tu occurs in the absence of a codon–anticodon interaction. A recent crystal structure revealed that SmpB residue His136 stacks on 16S rRNA nucleotide G530, a critical player in the canonical decoding mechanism. Here we use pre-steady-state kinetic methods to probe the role of this interaction in ribosome rescue. We find that although mutation of His136 does not reduce SmpB''s affinity for the ribosomal A-site, it dramatically reduces the rate of GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu. Surprisingly, the same mutation has little effect on the apparent rate of peptide-bond formation, suggesting that release of EF-Tu from the tmRNA/SmpB complex on the ribosome may occur prior to GTP hydrolysis. Consistent with this idea, we find that peptidyl transfer to tmRNA is relatively insensitive to the antibiotic kirromycin. Taken together, our studies provide a model for the initial stages of ribosomal rescue by tmRNA.     

Thiostrepton inhibition of tRNA delivery to the ribosome

Ribosome-stimulated hydrolysis of guanosine-5'-triphosphate (GTP) by guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) translation factors drives protein synthesis by the ribosome. Allosteric coupling of GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) at the ribosomal GTPase center to messenger RNA (mRNA) codon:aminoacyl-transfer RNA (aa-tRNA) anticodon recognition at the ribosomal decoding site is essential for accurate and rapid aa-tRNA selection. Here we use single-molecule methods to investigate the mechanism of action of the antibiotic thiostrepton and show that the GTPase center of the ribosome has at least two discrete functions during aa-tRNA selection: binding of EF-Tu(GTP) and stimulation of GTP hydrolysis by the factor. We separate these two functions of the GTPase center and assign each to distinct, conserved structural regions of the ribosome. The data provide a specific model for the coupling between the decoding site and the GTPase center during aa-tRNA selection as well as a general mechanistic model for ribosome-stimulated GTP hydrolysis by GTPase translation factors.     

Codon-dependent conformational change of elongation factor Tu preceding GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome.

The mechanisms by which elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) promotes the binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the ribosome and, in particular, how GTP hydrolysis by EF-Tu is triggered on the ribosome, are not understood. We report steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements, performed in the Escherichia coli system, in which the interaction of the complex EF-Tu.GTP.Phe-tRNAPhe with the ribosomal A site is monitored by the fluorescence changes of either mant-dGTP [3'-O-(N-methylanthraniloyl)-2-deoxyguanosine triphosphate], replacing GTP in the complex, or of wybutine in the anticodon loop of the tRNA. Additionally, GTP hydrolysis is measured by the quench-flow technique. We find that codon-anticodon interaction induces a rapid rearrangement within the G domain of EF-Tu around the bound nucleotide, which is followed by GTP hydrolysis at an approximately 1.5-fold lower rate. In the presence of kirromycin, the activated conformation of EF-Tu appears to be frozen. The steps following GTP hydrolysis--the switch of EF-Tu to the GDP-bound conformation, the release of aminoacyl-tRNA from EF-Tu to the A site, and the dissociation of EF-Tu-GDP from the ribosome--which are altogether suppressed by kirromycin, are not distinguished kinetically. The results suggest that codon recognition by the ternary complex on the ribosome initiates a series of structural rearrangements resulting in a conformational change of EF-Tu, possibly involving the effector region, which, in turn, triggers GTP hydrolysis.     

GTPases mechanisms and functions of translation factors on the ribosome

The elongation factors (EF) Tu and G and initiation factor 2 (IF2) from bacteria are multidomain GTPases with essential functions in the elongation and initiation phases of translation. They bind to the same site on the ribosome where their low intrinsic GTPase activities are strongly stimulated. The factors differ fundamentally from each other, and from the majority of GTPases, in the mechanisms of GTPase control, the timing of Pi release, and the functional role of GTP hydrolysis. EF-Tu x GTP forms a ternary complex with aminoacyl-tRNA, which binds to the ribosome. Only when a matching codon is recognized, the GTPase of EF-Tu is stimulated, rapid GTP hydrolysis and Pi release take place, EF-Tu rearranges to the GDP form, and aminoacyl-tRNA is released into the peptidyltransferase center. In contrast, EF-G hydrolyzes GTP immediately upon binding to the ribosome, stimulated by ribosomal protein L7/12. Subsequent translocation is driven by the slow dissociation of Pi, suggesting a mechano-chemical function of EF-G. Accordingly, different conformations of EF-G on the ribosome are revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is triggered upon formation of the 70S initiation complex, and the dissociation of Pi and/or IF2 follows a rearrangement of the ribosome into the elongation-competent state.     

The importance of P-loop and domain movements in EF-Tu for guanine nucleotide exchange

Elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) is the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu). An important feature of the nucleotide exchange is the structural rearrangement of EF-Tu in the EF-Tu.EF-Ts complex caused by insertion of Phe-81 of EF-Ts between His-84 and His-118 of EF-Tu. In this study, the contribution of His-118 to nucleotide release was studied by pre-steady state kinetic analysis of nucleotide exchange in EF-Tu mutants in which His-118 was replaced by Ala or Glu. Intrinsic as well as EF-Ts-catalyzed release of GDP/GTP was affected by the mutations, resulting in an approximately 10-fold faster spontaneous nucleotide release and a 10-50-fold slower EF-Ts-catalyzed nucleotide release. The effects are attributed to the interference of the mutations with the EF-Ts-induced movements of the P-loop of EF-Tu and changes at the domain 1/3 interface, leading to the release of the beta-phosphate group of GTP/GDP. The K(d) for GTP is increased by more than 40 times when His-118 is replaced with Glu, which may explain the inhibition by His-118 mutations of aminoacyl-tRNA binding to EF-Tu. The mutations had no effect on EF-Tu-dependent delivery of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosome.     

Hydrolysis of GTP by the alpha-chain of Gs and other GTP binding proteins

The functions of G proteins--like those of bacterial elongation factor (EF) Tu and the 21 kDa ras proteins (p21ras)--depend upon their abilities to bind and hydrolyze GTP and to assume different conformations in GTP- and GDP-bound states. Similarities in function and amino acid sequence indicate that EF-Tu, p21ras, and G protein alpha-chains evolved from a primordial GTP-binding protein. Proteins in all three families appear to share common mechanisms for GTP-dependent conformational change and hydrolysis of bound GTP. Biochemical and molecular genetic studies of the alpha-chain of Gs (alpha s) point to key regions that are involved in GTP-dependent conformational change and in hydrolysis of GTP. Tumorigenic mutations of alpha s in human pituitary tumors inhibit the protein's GTPase activity and cause constitutive elevation of adenylyl cyclase activity. One such mutation replaces a Gln residue in alpha s that corresponds to Gln-61 of p21ras; mutational replacements of this residue in both proteins inhibit their GTPase activities. A second class of GTPase inhibiting mutations in alpha s occurs in the codon for an Arg residue whose covalent modification by cholera toxin also inhibits GTP hydrolysis by alpha s. This Arg residue is located in a domain of alpha s not represented in EF-Tu or p21ras. We propose that this domain constitutes an intrinsic activator of GTP hydrolysis, and that it performs a function analogous to that performed for EF-Tu by the programmed ribosome and for p21ras by the recently discovered GTPase-activating protein.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Delayed release of inorganic phosphate from elongation factor Tu following GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

The dissociation of inorganic phosphate (P(i)) following GTP hydrolysis is a key step determining the functional state of many GTPases. Here, the timing of P(i) release from elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and its implications for the function of EF-Tu on the ribosome were studied by rapid kinetic techniques. It was found that P(i) release from EF-Tu is >20-fold slower than GTP cleavage and limits the rate of the conformational switch of EF-Tu from the GTP- to the GDP-bound form. The point mutation Gly94Ala in the switch 2 region of EF-Tu abolished the delay in P(i) release, suggesting that P(i) release is controlled by the mobility of the switch 2 region with Gly94 acting as a pivot. The rate of P(i) release or the conformational switch of EF-Tu does not affect the selection of aminoacyl-tRNA on the ribosome. Rather, the slow P(i) release may be a consequence of the tight interaction of the switch regions of EF-Tu with the gamma-phosphate and the ribosome in the GTPase activated state of the factor.     

Domain III of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus is essential for induction of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Two elongation factors (EF) EF-Tu and EF-G participate in the elongation phase during protein biosynthesis on the ribosome. Their functional cycles depend on GTP binding and its hydrolysis. The EF-Tu complexed with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA delivers tRNA to the ribosome, whereas EF-G stimulates translocation, a process in which tRNA and mRNA movements occur in the ribosome. In the present paper we report that: (a) intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is influenced by excision of its domain III; (b) the EF-G lacking domain III has a 10(3)-fold decreased GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas its affinity for GTP is slightly decreased; and (c) the truncated EF-G does not stimulate translocation despite the physical presence of domain IV, which is also very important for translocation. By contrast, the interactions of the truncated factor with GDP and fusidic acid-dependent binding of EF-G.GDP complex to the ribosome are not influenced. These findings indicate an essential contribution of domain III to activation of GTP hydrolysis. These results also suggest conformational changes of the EF-G molecule in the course of its interaction with the ribosome that might be induced by GTP binding and hydrolysis.     

Role of domains 4 and 5 in elongation factor G functions on the ribosome

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is a large, five domain GTPase that catalyses the translocation of the tRNAs on the bacterial ribosome at the expense of GTP. In the crystal structure of GDP-bound EF-G, domain 1 (G domain) makes direct contacts with domains 2 and 5, whereas domain 4 protrudes from the body of the molecule. Here, we show that the presence of both domains 4 and 5 is essential for tRNA translocation and for the turnover of the factor on the ribosome, but not for rapid single-round GTP hydrolysis by EF-G. Replacement of a highly conserved histidine residue at the tip of domain 4, His583, with lysine or arginine decreases the rate of tRNA translocation at least 100-fold, whereas the binding of the factor to the ribosome, GTP hydrolysis and P(i) release are not affected by the mutations. Various small deletions in the tip region of domain 4 decrease the translocation activity of EF-G even further, but do not block the turnover of the factor. Unlike native EF-G, the mutants of EF-G lacking domains 4/5 do not interact with the alpha-sarcin stem-loop of 23 S rRNA. These mutants are not released from the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis or translocation, indicating that the contact with, or a conformational change of, the alpha-sarcin stem-loop is required for EF-G release from the ribosome.     

Mechanism of EF-Ts-catalyzed guanine nucleotide exchange in EF-Tu: contribution of interactions mediated by helix B of EF-Tu

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) belongs to the family of GTP-binding proteins and requires elongation factor Ts (EF-Ts) for nucleotide exchange. Crystal structures suggested that one of the salient features in the EF-Tu x EF-Ts complex is a conformation change in the switch II region of EF-Tu that is initiated by intrusion of Phe81 of EF-Ts between His84 and His118 of EF-Tu and may result in a destabilization of Mg2+ coordination and guanine nucleotide release. In the present paper, the contribution of His84 to nucleotide release was studied by pre-steady-state kinetic analysis of nucleotide exchange in mutant EF-Tu in which His84 was replaced by Ala. Both intrinsic and EF-Ts-catalyzed nucleotide release was affected by the mutation, resulting in a 10-fold faster spontaneous GDP release and a 4-fold faster EF-Ts-catalyzed release of GTP and GDP. Removal of Mg2+ from the EF-Tu x EF-Ts complex increased the rate constant of GDP release 2-fold, suggesting a small contribution to nucleotide exchange. Together with published data on the effects of mutations interfering with other putative interactions between EF-Tu and EF-Ts, the results suggest that each of the contacts in the EF-Tu x EF-Ts complex alone contributes moderately to nucleotide destabilization, but together they act synergistically to bring about the overall 60,000-fold acceleration of nucleotide exchange in EF-Tu by EF-Ts.     

Conformational change of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) induced by antibiotic binding. Crystal structure of the complex between EF-Tu.GDP and aurodox

Aurodox is a member of the family of kirromycin antibiotics, which inhibit protein biosynthesis by binding to elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu). We have determined the crystal structure of the 1:1:1 complex of Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu with GDP and aurodox to 2.0-A resolution. During its catalytic cycle, EF-Tu adopts two strikingly different conformations depending on the nucleotide bound: the GDP form and the GTP form. In the present structure, a GTP complex-like conformation of EF-Tu is observed, although GDP is bound to the nucleotide-binding site. This is consistent with previous proposals that aurodox fixes EF-Tu on the ribosome by locking it in its GTP form. Binding of EF-Tu.GDP to aminoacyl-tRNA and mutually exclusive binding of kirromycin and elongation factor Ts to EF-Tu can be explained on the basis of the structure. For many previously observed mutations that provide resistance to kirromycin, it can now be understood how they prevent interaction with the antibiotic. An unexpected feature of the structure is the reorientation of the His-85 side chain toward the nucleotide-binding site. We propose that this residue stabilizes the transition state of GTP hydrolysis, explaining the acceleration of the reaction by kirromycin-type antibiotics.     

Initiation factor IF2, thiostrepton and micrococcin prevent the binding of elongation factor G to the Escherichia coli ribosome

The bacterial translational GTPases (initiation factor IF2, elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu and release factor RF3) are involved in all stages of translation, and evidence indicates that they bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome, whereupon GTP hydrolysis is triggered. We provide evidence for a common ribosomal binding site for EF-G and IF2. IF2 prevents the binding of EF-G to the ribosome, as shown by Western blot analysis and fusidic acid-stabilized EF-G.GDP.ribosome complex formation. Additionally, IF2 inhibits EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis on 70 S ribosomes. The antibiotics thiostrepton and micrococcin, which bind to part of the EF-G binding site and interfere with the function of the factor, also affect the function of IF2. While thiostrepton is a strong inhibitor of EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis, GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is stimulated by the drug. Micrococcin stimulates GTP hydrolysis by both factors. We show directly that these drugs act by destabilizing the interaction of EF-G with the ribosome, and provide evidence that they have similar effects on IF2.     

Missense suppressor mutations in 16S rRNA reveal the importance of helices h8 and h14 in aminoacyl-tRNA selection

The molecular basis of the induced-fit mechanism that determines the fidelity of protein synthesis remains unclear. Here, we isolated mutations in 16S rRNA that increase the rate of miscoding and stop codon read-through. Many of the mutations clustered along interfaces between the 30S shoulder domain and other parts of the ribosome, strongly implicating shoulder movement in the induced-fit mechanism of decoding. The largest subset of mutations mapped to helices h8 and h14. These helices interact with each other and with the 50S subunit to form bridge B8. Previous cryo-EM studies revealed a contact between h14 and the switch 1 motif of EF-Tu, raising the possibility that h14 plays a direct role in GTPase activation. To investigate this possibility, we constructed both deletions and insertions in h14. While ribosomes harboring a 2-base-pair (bp) insertion in h14 were completely inactive in vivo, those containing a 2-bp deletion retained activity but were error prone. In vitro, the truncation of h14 accelerated GTP hydrolysis for EF-Tu bearing near-cognate aminoacyl-tRNA, an effect that can largely account for the observed miscoding in vivo. These data show that h14 does not help activate EF-Tu but instead negatively controls GTP hydrolysis by the factor. We propose that bridge B8 normally acts to counter inward rotation of the shoulder domain; hence, mutations in h8 and h14 that compromise this bridge decrease the stringency of aminoacyl-tRNA selection.     

Arginines 29 and 59 of elongation factor G are important for GTP hydrolysis or translocation on the ribosome

GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G (EF-G) is essential for the translocation step in protein elongation. The low intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is strongly stimulated by the ribosome. Here we show that a conserved arginine, R29, of Escherichia coli EF-G is crucial for GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome, but not for GTP binding or ribosome interaction, suggesting that it may be directly involved in catalysis. Another conserved arginine, R59, which is homologous to the catalytic arginine of G(alpha) proteins, is not essential for GTP hydrolysis, but influences ribosome binding and translocation. These results indicate that EF-G is similar to other GTPases in that an arginine residue is required for GTP hydrolysis, although the structural changes leading to GTPase activation are different.     

The structural and functional basis for the kirromycin resistance of mutant EF-Tu species in Escherichia coli.

A structural and functional understanding of resistance to the antibiotic kirromycin in Escherichia coli has been sought in order to shed new light on the functioning of the bacterial elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), in particular its ability to act as a molecular switch. The mutant EF-Tu species G316D, A375T, A375V and Q124K, isolated by M13mp phage-mediated targeted mutagenesis, were studied. In this order the mutant EF-Tu species showed increasing resistance to the antibiotic as measured by poly(U)-directed poly(Phe) synthesis and intrinsic GTPase activities. The K'd values for kirromycin binding to mutant EF-Tu.GTP and EF-Tu.GDP increased in the same order. All mutation sites cluster in the interface of domains 1 and 3 of EF-Tu.GTP, not in that of EF-Tu.GDP. Evidence is presented that kirromycin binds to this interface of wild-type EF-Tu.GTP, thereby jamming the conformational switch of EF-Tu upon GTP hydrolysis. We conclude that the mutations result in two separate mechanisms of resistance to kirromycin. The first inhibits access of the antibiotic to its binding site on EF-Tu.GTP. A second mechanism exists on the ribosome, when mutant EF-Tu species release kirromycin and polypeptide chain elongation continues.