Secretory production of an FAD cofactor-containing cytosolic enzyme (sorbitol–xylitol oxidase from Streptomyces coelicolor) using the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) pathway of Corynebacterium glutamicum

Carbohydrate oxidases are biotechnologically interesting enzymes that require a tightly or covalently bound cofactor for activity. Using the industrial workhorse Corynebacterium glutamicum as the expression host, successful secretion of a normally cytosolic FAD cofactor-containing sorbitol–xylitol oxidase from Streptomyces coelicolor was achieved by using the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) protein export machinery for protein translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane. Our results demonstrate for the first time that, also for cofactor-containing proteins, a secretory production strategy is a feasible and promising alternative to conventional intracellular expression strategies.The secretory expression of recombinant proteins can offer significant process advantages over cytosolic production strategies, since secretion into the growth medium greatly facilitates downstream processing and therefore can significantly reduce the costs of producing a desired target protein (Quax, 1997). And, in fact, the enormous secretion capacity of certain Gram-positive bacteria (e.g. various Bacillus species) has been used since many years in industry for the production of mainly host-derived secretory proteins such as proteases and amylases, resulting in amounts of more than 20 g l⁻¹ culture medium (Harwood and Cranenburg, 2008). In contrast, attempts to use Bacillus species for the secretory production of heterologous proteins have often failed or led to disappointing results, a fact that, among other reasons, could in many cases be attributed to the presence of multiple cell wall-associated and secreted proteases that rapidly degraded the heterologous target proteins (Li et al., 2004; Sarvas et al., 2004; Westers et al., 2011). Therefore, an increasing need exists to explore alternative host systems with respect to their ability to express and secrete problematic and/or complex heterologous proteins of biotechnological interest.So far, the Gram-positive bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum has been used in industry mainly for the production of amino acids and other low-molecular weight compounds (Leuchtenberger et al., 2005; Becker and Wittmann, 2011; Litsanov et al., 2012). However, various recent reports have indicated that C. glutamicum might likewise possess a great potential as an alternative host system for the secretory expression of foreign proteins. Corynebacterium glutamicum belongs to a class of diderm Gram-positive bacteria that, besides the cytoplasmic membrane, possess an additional mycolic acid-containing outer membrane-like structure that acts as an extremely efficient permeability barrier for hydrophilic compounds (Hoffmann et al., 2008; Zuber et al., 2008). Despite this fact, an efficient secretion of various heterologous proteins into the growth medium of this microorganism has been observed (e.g. Billman-Jacobe et al., 1995; Meissner et al., 2007; Kikuchi et al., 2009; Tateno et al., 2009; Tsuchidate et al., 2011).In bacteria, two major export pathways exist for the transport of proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane that fundamentally differ with respect to the folding status of their respective substrate proteins during the actual translocation step. The general secretion (Sec) system transports its substrates in a more or less unfolded state and folding takes places on the trans side of the membrane after the actual transport event (Yuan et al., 2010; du Plessis et al., 2011). In contrast, the alternative twin-arginine translocation (Tat) system translocates its substrates in a fully folded form and therefore provides an attractive alternative for the secretory production of proteins that cannot be produced in a functional form via the Sec route (Brüser, 2007). Carbohydrate oxidases are biotechnologically interesting enzymes (van Hellemond et al., 2006) that are excluded from Sec-dependent secretion since they depend on a tightly or covalently bound cofactor for their activity and, for this reason, require that their folding and cofactor insertion has to take place in the cytosol. Because C. glutamicum has shown to be an excellent host for the Tat-dependent secretion of the cofactor-less model protein GFP (Meissner et al., 2007; Teramoto et al., 2011), we now asked whether it is likewise possible to secrete a cofactor-containing enzyme into the supernatant of C. glutamicum using the same protein export route.As a model protein, we chose the sorbitol–xylitol oxidase (SoXy) from Streptomyces coelicolor, a normally cytosolic enzyme that possesses a covalently bound FAD molecule as cofactor (Heuts et al., 2007; Forneris et al., 2008). FAD is incorporated into the apoprotein in a post-translational and self-catalytic process that only occurs if the polypeptide chain has adopted a correctly folded structure (Heuts et al., 2007; 2009). To direct SoXy into the Tat export pathway of C. glutamicum, we constructed a gene encoding a TorA–SoXy hybrid precursor in which SoXy is fused to the strictly Tat-specific signal peptide of the periplasmic Escherichia coli Tat substrate trimethylamine N-oxide reductase (TorA) (Fig. 1) which, in our previous study, has been proven to be a functional and strictly Tat-specific signal peptide also in C. glutamicum (Meissner et al., 2007). The corresponding torA–soxy gene was cloned into the expression vector pEKEx2 (Eikmanns et al., 1991) under the control of an IPTG-inducible P_tac promotor. After transformation of the resulting plasmid pTorA–SoXy into the C. glutamicum ATCC13032 wild-type strain, two independent colonies of the resulting recombinant C. glutamicum (pTorA–SoXy) strain and, as a control, a colony of a strain that contained the empty expression vector without insert [C. glutamicum (pEKEx2)] were grown in CGXII medium (Keilhauer et al., 1993) at 30°C for 16 h in the presence of 1 mM IPTG. Subsequently, the proteins present in the culture supernatants were analysed by SDS-PAGE followed by staining with Coomassie blue. As shown in Fig. 2, in the supernatants of the pTorA–SoXy-containing cells (lanes 3 and 4), a prominent protein band of approximately 44 kDa can be detected, the size of which is very similar to the calculated molecular mass (44.4 kDa) of SoXy. Since this band is completely lacking in the supernatant of the control strain (lane 2), this strongly suggests that this band corresponds to SoXy that has been secreted into the culture supernatant of C. glutamicum (pTorA–SoXy). And, in fact, this suggestion was subsequently confirmed in a direct way by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry after extraction of the protein out of the gel followed by tryptic digestion (Schaffer et al., 2001) (data not shown).Open in a separate windowFigure 1The TorA–SoXy hybrid precursor protein. Upper part: Schematic drawing of the relevant part of the pTorA–SoXy expression vector. P_tac, IPTG-inducible tac promotor. RBS, ribosome binding site. To maintain the authentic TorA signal peptidase cleavage site, the first four amino acids of the mature TorA protein (black bar) were retained in the TorA–SoXy fusion protein. White bar: TorA signal peptide (TorA^SP); grey bar: SoXy (amino acids 2–418). Lower part: Amino acid sequence of the signal peptide and early mature region of the TorA–SoXy hybrid precursor. The twin-arginine consensus motif of the TorA signal peptide is underlined. The four amino acids derived from mature TorA are shown in italics. The signal peptidase cleavage site is indicated by an arrowhead.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Secretion of SoXy into the growth medium of C. glutamicum. Cells of C. glutamicum ATCC13032 containing the empty vector pEKEx2 and two independently transformed colonies of C. glutamicum (pTorA–SoXy) were grown overnight in 5 ml of BHI medium (Difco) at 30°C. The cells were washed once with CGXII medium (Keilhauer et al., 1993) and inoculated to an OD₆₀₀ of 0.5 in 5 ml of fresh CGXII medium containing 1 mM IPTG. After 16 h of further growth at 30°C, the supernatant fractions were prepared as described previously (Meissner et al., 2007). Samples corresponding to an equal number of cells were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by staining with Coomassie blue. Lane 1, molecular mass marker (kDa). Lane 2, C. glutamicum (pEKEx2); lanes 3 and 4, C. glutamicum (pTorA–SoXy). The position of the secreted SoXy protein is indicated by an arrow.Next, the supernatant of C. glutamicum (pTorA–SoXy) was analysed for SoXy enzyme activity by measuring the production of H₂O₂ that is formed during the enzymatic conversion of sorbitol to fructose (Meiattini, 1983). Six hours after induction of gene expression by 1 mM IPTG, an enzymatic activity of 10.3 ± 1.6 nmol min⁻¹ ml⁻¹ could be determined in the supernatant of C. glutamicum (pTorA–SoXy). In contrast, no such activity was found in the supernatant of the control strain C. glutamicum (pEKEx2). From these results we conclude that we have succeeded in the secretion of enzymatically active and therefore FAD cofactor-containing SoXy into the culture supernatant of C. glutamicum.Finally, we examined whether the secretion of SoXy had in fact occurred via the Tat pathway of C. glutamicum. Plasmid pTorA–SoXy was used to transform C. glutamcium ATCC13032 wild type and a C. glutamicum ΔTatAC mutant strain that lacks two essential components of the Tat transport machinery and therefore does not possess a functional Tat translocase (Meissner et al., 2007). The corresponding cells were grown in BHI medium (Difco) at 30°C in the presence of 1 mM IPTG for 6 h. Subsequently, the proteins present in the cellular and the supernatant fractions of the corresponding cells were analysed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting using SoXy-specific antibodies. As shown in Fig. 3, polypeptides corresponding to the unprocessed TorA–SoXy precursor and some minor smaller degradation products of it can be detected in the cellular fractions of both the wild-type and the ΔTatAC deletion strains (lanes 3 and 5). In the supernatant fraction of the Tat⁺ wild-type strain (lane 4), but not that of the ΔTatAC strain (lane 6), a polypeptide corresponding to mature SoXy is present, clearly showing that export of SoXy in the wild-type strain had occurred in a strictly Tat-dependent manner. Another noteworthy finding is the observation that hardly any mature SoXy protein accumulated in the cellular fraction of the Tat⁺ wild-type strain (lane 3), indicating that SoXy is, after its Tat-dependent translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane and processing by signal peptidase, rapidly transported out of the intermembrane space across the mycolic acid-containing outer membrane into the supernatant. However, the mechanism of how proteins cross this additional permeability barrier is completely unknown so far (Bitter et al., 2009).Open in a separate windowFigure 3Transport of TorA–SoXy occurs in a strictly Tat-dependent manner. Plasmid pTorA–SoXy was transformed into C. glutamcium ATCC13032 (Tat⁺) and a C. glutamicum ΔTatAC mutant that lacks a functional Tat translocase (Meissner et al., 2007). As a control, the empty pEKEx2 expression vector was transformed into C. glutamicum ATCC13032 (Tat⁺). The respective strains were grown overnight in 5 ml of BHI medium (Difco) at 30°C. The cells were washed once with BHI and resuspended in 20 ml of fresh BHI medium containing 1 mM IPTG. After 6 h of further growth at 30°C, the cellular (C) and supernatant (S) fractions were prepared as described previously (Meissner et al., 2007). Samples of the C and S fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using anti-SoXy antibodies as indicated at the top of the figure. Lanes 1 and 2: C. glutamicum ATCC13032 (pEKEx2); lanes 3 and 4: C. glutamicum ATCC13032 (pTorA–SoXy); lanes 5 and 6: C. glutamicum ΔTatAC (pTorA–SoXy). Asterisk: TorA–SoXy precursor; arrow: secreted SoXy protein. The positions of molecular mass markers (kDa) are indicated at the left margin of the figure.To the best of our knowledge, our results represent the first documented example of the successful secretion of a normally cytosolic, cofactor-containing protein via the Tat pathway in an active form into the culture supernatant of a recombinant expression host. Our results clearly show that, also for this biotechnologically very interesting class of proteins, a secretory production strategy can be a promising alternative to conventional intracellular expression strategies. Besides for SoXy and other FAD-containing carbohydrate oxidases, for which various applications are perceived by industry such as the in situ generation of hydrogen peroxide for bleaching and disinfection performance in technical applications, their use in the food and drink industry, as well as their use in diagnostic applications and carbohydrate biosynthesis processes (Oda and Hiraga, 1998; Murooka and Yamashita, 2001; van Hellemond et al., 2006; Heuts et al., 2007), a secretory production strategy might now be an attractive option also for biotechnologically relevant enzymes that are used as biocatalysts in chemo-enzymatic syntheses and that possess cofactors other than FAD, such as pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP)-dependent ω-transaminases (Mathew and Yun, 2012) or various thiamin diphosphate (TDP)-dependent enzymes (Müller et al., 2009).     

Synapse reorganization—a new partnership revealed

Changes in synaptic function require both qualitative and quantitative reorganization of the synaptic components. Ca²⁺ plays a central role in this process, but the mechanism has not been fully elucidated. Zhang et al report a novel mechanism whereby Ca²⁺/calmodulin (CaM) regulates the stability of the postsynaptic scaffold. Ca²⁺/CaM interacts with PSD-95, a core protein in the postsynaptic density (PSD) that supports synaptic signaling and structural components. Ca²⁺/CaM interferes with the palmitoylation of PSD-95, resulting in the dissociation of PSD-95 from the postsynaptic membrane. This process may explain the reduction of surface glutamate receptor observed during synaptic depression and homeostatic regulation of the synaptic response after prolonged neuronal activity.The adaptation of synaptic strength is a fundamental process for learning and memory. This form of synaptic plasticity is triggered by influx of Ca²⁺ from NMDA-type glutamate receptor (NMDAR), leading to the synaptic insertion or removal of AMPA-type glutamate receptor (AMPAR) and determines the strength of synaptic transmission. This process is mediated by the gross reorganization of the postsynaptic composition in a qualitative and quantitative fashion (Bosch et al, 2014). Importantly, the number of synaptic AMPAR is regulated by the number and affinity of postsynaptic ‘slots’, a hypothetical receptor binding site within a synapse, which is regulated during synaptic plasticity processes.PSD-95, a scaffolding protein at excitatory synapses, has been considered as a major candidate for the slot. It interacts with AMPAR through the TARP/stargazin protein family and modulates the synaptic localization of the receptor as well as the strength of synaptic transmission (El-Husseini et al, 2000). In turn, the localization of PSD-95 at the synapse is regulated by a constant cycle of palmitoylation by protein palmitoyl acyltransferases (PAT) at cysteines 3 and 5, which is required for efficient synaptic targeting of the protein, and depalmitoylation by palmitoyl protein thioesterases (PPT) (El-Husseini et al, 2002; Noritake et al, 2009). Activation of glutamate receptors increases depalmitoylated PSD-95 and releases it from the postsynaptic site (El-Husseini et al, 2002; Sturgill et al, 2009), whereas blockage of neuronal activity by TTX increases palmitoylated PSD-95 and targets it to the synapse (Noritake et al, 2009). However, it remains unclear how neuronal activity controls the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle and the subsequent trafficking of PSD-95 to and from the synapse.In this issue of The EMBO Journal, using a combination of structural biological, biochemical, and cell biological approaches, Zhang et al (2014) revealed a novel mechanism by which Ca²⁺ regulates the synaptic localization of PSD-95. The authors found that Ca²⁺ complexed to CaM can bind PSD-95 within the first 13 residues—the exact location where palmitoylation takes place. Ca²⁺/CaM binds preferentially to unmodified PSD-95, thereby blocking the accessibility of the PAT to the palmitoylation sites. In contrast, Ca²⁺/CaM does not bind to palmitoylated PSD-95, and therefore, palmitoylated PSD-95 is subject to depalymitoylation by PPT. Overall, the net effect of Ca²⁺/CaM is a reduction of PSD-95 bound to the synaptic membrane (Fig​(Fig1).1). Consistent with this, a PSD-95 mutant that was unable to bind Ca²⁺/CaM does not leave the synapse following glutamate/glycine treatment. Furthermore, the mutant PSD-95 showed an increased in synaptic accumulation, indicating that the treatment also increases palmitoylation activity but it is normally dominated by the depalmitoylating action of Ca²⁺/CaM binding (Noritake et al, 2009).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Calcium influx-induced release of PSD-95 and glutamate receptor from the synapseAt a synapse, cysteine residues of PSD-95 (C3 and C5) are under a continuous cycle of palmitoylation by protein palmitoyl acyltransferase (PAT), and depalmitoylation by palmitoyl protein thioesterase (PPT). A. Palmitoylated PSD-95 associates with the synaptic membrane and CDKL5 and serves as a ‘slot’ for AMPAR at the synapse through the interaction with TARP/stargazin. B. Upon glutamate stimulation, Ca²⁺ influx through NMDARs induces binding of Ca²⁺/CaM to PSD-95. Ca²⁺/CaM blocks the accessibility of PAT, thereby facilitating the depalmitoylation of PSD-95, which subsequently allows PSD-95 to dissociate from the synaptic membrane and CDKL5. C. The dissociation of PSD-95 from the synaptic membrane reduces the number of available ‘slots’ for AMPAR on the postsynaptic membrane, leading to a reduction of AMPAR-mediated synaptic transmission.The beauty of the work by Zhang et al (2014) is that the structure fully explains the biology. However, several important questions remain. Above all, it is still unclear when this mechanism would operate. Generally, the palmitoylation/depalmitoylation cycle is considered to be in the order of minutes. Therefore, for Ca²⁺/CaM to effectively reduce the palmitoylation of PSD-95, a prolonged influx of Ca²⁺ is required. In contrast, the rise in intracellular Ca²⁺ induced by a single excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) or dendritic action potential is in the order of milliseconds to seconds. A slow repetitive stimulation protocol, such as that used to induce long-term depression (LTD) (1 Hz, 15 min), may be effective in increasing Ca²⁺/CaM for a sufficiently long period of time. Homeostatic scaling induced by a prolonged increase in network activity (for example, via the pharmacological blockade of inhibitory synaptic transmission) may also be a possible mechanism for the Ca²⁺/CaM-mediated removal of synaptic PSD-95. In contrast, stimulation used to induce long-term potentiation (LTP) (a brief high-frequency stimulation such as 100 Hz, 1 s) may not be effective. Indeed, Bosch et al (2014) found that the induction of LTP at single dendritic spines in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons does not decrease or increase PSD-95 during the first hour after induction even if the dendritic spine enlarges during this period.In this context, it is important to understand what impact Ca²⁺/CaM-mediated removal of synaptic PSD-95 has on synaptic transmission. If PSD-95 is indeed the slot for AMPAR, the Ca²⁺/CaM-mediated removal of synaptic PSD-95 is expected to reduce the synaptic transmission. The stimulation protocol used here by Zhang et al (bath application of glutamate/glycine) is similar to previously reported approaches to induce ‘chemical’ LTD and hence can provide an explanation for the decrease in PSD-95 from the synapse for 10–15 min after stimulation. The PSD-95 mutant that is unable to bind Ca²⁺/CaM will be useful to further analyze the link between the observed PSD-95-Ca²⁺/CaM interaction and synaptic plasticity.PSD-95 is also known to interact with the cyclin-dependent protein kinase-like kinase 5 (CDKL5) at the first 19 residues in a palmitoylation-dependent manner (Zhu et al, 2013). As expected, Ca²⁺/CaM binding also regulates CDKL5 association with PSD-95. The treatment of neurons with NMDA reduces the palmitoylation of PSD-95 and, concomitantly, the association with CDKL5. Mutations of CDKL5 and netrin-G1 gene have been reported in patients with an atypical form of Rett syndrome. Netrin-G1 ligand (NGL1) has been identified as an interaction partner and substrate of CDKL5 (Ricciardi et al, 2012). CDKL5 phosphorylates NGL1, and this phosphorylation stabilizes the interaction of NGL1 with PSD-95. Given that the Ca²⁺ signal only lasts a few milliseconds to seconds, it is important to investigate the spatiotemporal interaction between CaM, PSD-95, CDKL5, and NGL1 in dendritic spines during physiological and pathological conditions. In addition, CDKL5 can function as an upstream modulator of Rac signaling during development (Chen et al, 2010). Together with the fact that Rac also plays an important role in long-term potentiation, the PSD-95/CDKL5 complex might regulate Rac activity in the vicinity of the PSD.Other neuronal proteins including AMPAR subunit GluR1/2, glutamate receptor interacting protein (GRIP), G-protein-coupled receptors, δ-catenin, and small and trimeric G-proteins can also undergo palmitoylation, suggesting that this process plays an essential role in subcellular targeting and that these proteins can be regulated by activity (Kang et al, 2008). The question of whether Ca²⁺/CaM can regulate the palmitoylation of these proteins remains. Interestingly, the Ca²⁺/CaM interaction site of PSD-95 does not conform to a canonical IQ-motif, a CaM binding motif found in many other proteins (Zhang et al, 2014). Therefore, a bioinformatic approach is not possible at this point in time. This opens further directions of research.     

Molecular basis of cross‐species ACE2 interactions with SARS‐CoV‐2‐like viruses of pangolin origin

Correction to: The EMBO Journal (2021) 40: e107786. DOI 10.15252/embj.2021107786 | Published online 8 June 2021The authors would like to add three references to the paper: Starr et al and Zahradník et al also reported that the Q498H or Q498R mutation has enhanced binding affinity to ACE2; and Liu et al reported on the binding of bat coronavirus to ACE2.Starr et al and Zahradník et al have now been cited in the Discussion section, and the following sentence has been corrected from:“According to our data, the SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD with Q498H increases the binding strength to hACE2 by 5‐fold, suggesting the Q498H mutant is more ready to interact with human receptor than the wildtype and highlighting the necessity for more strict control of virus and virus‐infected animals”.to“Here, according to our data and two recently published papers, the SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD with Q498H or Q498R increases the binding strength to hACE2 (Starr et al, 2020; Zahradník et al, 2021), suggesting the mutant with Q498H or Q498R is more ready to interact with human receptor than the wild type and highlighting the necessity for more strict control of virus and virus‐infected animals”.The Liu et al citation has been added to the following sentence:“In another paper published by our group recently, RaTG13 RBD was found to bind to hACE2 with much lower binding affinity than SARS‐CoV‐2 though RaTG13 displays the highest whole‐genome sequence identity (96.2%) with the SARS‐CoV‐2 (Liu et al, 2021)”.Additionally, the authors have added the GISAID accession IDs to the sequence names of the SARS‐CoV‐2 in two human samples (Discussion section). To make identification unambiguous, the sequence names have been updated from “SA‐lsf‐27 and SA‐lsf‐37” to “GISAID accession ID: EPI_ISL_672581 and EPI_ISL_672589”.Lastly, the authors declare in the Materials and Methods section that all experiments employed SARS‐CoV‐2 pseudovirus in cultured cells. These experiments were performed in a BSL‐2‐level laboratory and approved by Science and Technology Conditions Platform Office, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.These changes are herewith incorporated into the paper.     

Insulin responsiveness of glucose transporter 4 in 3T3-L1 cells depends on the presence of sortilin

Insulin-dependent translocation of glucose transporter 4 (Glut4) to the plasma membrane of fat and skeletal muscle cells plays the key role in postprandial clearance of blood glucose. Glut4 represents the major cell-specific component of the insulin-responsive vesicles (IRVs). It is not clear, however, whether the presence of Glut4 in the IRVs is essential for their ability to respond to insulin stimulation. We prepared two lines of 3T3-L1 cells with low and high expression of myc₇-Glut4 and studied its translocation to the plasma membrane upon insulin stimulation, using fluorescence-assisted cell sorting and cell surface biotinylation. In undifferentiated 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, translocation of myc₇-Glut4 was low regardless of its expression levels. Coexpression of sortilin increased targeting of myc₇-Glut4 to the IRVs, and its insulin responsiveness rose to the maximal levels observed in fully differentiated adipocytes. Sortilin ectopically expressed in undifferentiated cells was translocated to the plasma membrane regardless of the presence or absence of myc₇-Glut4. AS160/TBC1D4 is expressed at low levels in preadipocytes but is induced in differentiation and provides an additional mechanism for the intracellular retention and insulin-stimulated release of Glut4.Adipocytes, skeletal muscle cells, and some neurons respond to insulin stimulation by translocating intracellular glucose transporter 4 (Glut4) to the plasma membrane. In all these cells, the insulin-responsive pool of Glut4 is localized in small membrane vesicles, the insulin-responsive vesicles (IRVs; Kandror and Pilch, 2011 ; Bogan, 2012 ). The protein composition of these vesicles has been largely characterized (Kandror and Pilch, 2011 ; Bogan, 2012 ). The IRVs consist predominantly of Glut4, insulin-responsive aminopeptidase (IRAP), sortilin, low-density-lipoprotein receptor–related protein 1 (LRP1), SCAMPs, and VAMP2. Glut4, IRAP, and sortilin physically interact with each other, which might be important for the biogenesis of the IRVs (Shi and Kandror, 2007 ; Shi et al., 2008 ). In addition, the IRVs compartmentalize recycling receptors, such as the transferrin receptor and the IGF2/mannose 6-phosphate receptor, although it is not clear whether these receptors represent obligatory vesicular components or their presence in the IRVs is explained by mass action (Pilch, 2008 ), inefficient sorting, or other reasons.Deciphering of the protein composition of the IRVs is important because it is likely to explain their unique functional property: translocation to the plasma membrane in response to insulin stimulation. Even if we presume that IRV trafficking is controlled by loosely associated peripheral membrane proteins, the latter should still somehow recognize the core vesicular components that create the “biochemical individuality” of this compartment. In spite of our knowledge of the IRV protein composition, however, the identity of the protein(s) that confer insulin sensitivity to these vesicles is unknown.Insulin responsiveness of the IRVs was associated with either IRAP or Glut4. Thus it was shown that Glut4 interacted with the intracellular anchor TUG (Bogan et al., 2003 , 2012 ), whereas IRAP associated with other proteins implemented in the regulation of Glut4 translocation, such as AS160 (Larance et al., 2005 ; Peck et al., 2006 ), p115 (Hosaka et al., 2005 ), tankyrase (Yeh et al., 2007 ), and several others (reviewed in Bogan, 2012 ). Results of these studies, or at least their interpretations, are not necessarily consistent with each other, as the existence of multiple independent anchors for the IRVs is, although possible, unlikely.Ablation of the individual IRV proteins has also led to controversial data. Thus knockout of IRAP decreases total protein levels of Glut4 but does not affect its translocation in the mouse model (Keller et al., 2002 ). On the contrary, knockdown of IRAP in 3T3-L1 adipocytes has a strong inhibitory effect on translocation of Glut4 (Yeh et al., 2007 ). In yet another study, knockdown of IRAP in 3T3-L1 adipocytes did not affect insulin-stimulated translocation of Glut4 but increased its plasma membrane content under basal conditions (Jordens et al., 2010 ). By the same token, total or partial ablation of Glut4 had various effects on expression levels, intracellular localization, and translocation of IRAP (Jiang et al., 2001 ; Abel et al., 2004 ; Carvalho et al., 2004 ; Gross et al., 2004 ; Yeh et al., 2007 ). Knockdown of either sortilin or LRP1 decreased protein levels of Glut4 (Shi and Kandror, 2005 ; Jedrychowski et al., 2010 ).One model that might explain these complicated and somewhat inconsistent results is that depletion of either major integral protein of the IRVs disrupts the network of interactions between vesicular proteins and thus decreases the efficiency of protein sorting into the IRVs (Kandror and Pilch, 2011 ). Correspondingly, the remaining IRV components that cannot be faithfully compartmentalized in the vesicles are either degraded (Jiang et al., 2001 ; Keller et al., 2002 ; Abel et al., 2004 ; Carvalho et al., 2004 ; Shi and Kandror, 2005 ; Yeh et al., 2007 ; Jedrychowski et al., 2010 ) or mistargeted (Jiang et al., 2001 ; Jordens et al., 2010 ), depending on experimental conditions and types of cells used in these studies. In other words, knockdown of any major IRV component may decrease vesicle formation along with insulin responsiveness. Thus, in spite of a large body of literature, the identity of protein(s) that confer insulin responsiveness to the IRVs is unknown.Here we used a gain-of-function approach to address this question. Specifically, we attempted to “build” functional IRVs in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 preadipocytes by forced expression of the relevant proteins. Undifferentiated preadipocytes do not express Glut4 or sortilin and lack IRVs (ElJack et al., 1999 ; Shi and Kandror, 2005 ; Shi et al., 2008 ). Correspondingly, IRAP, which is expressed in these cells, shows low insulin response (Ross et al., 1998 ; Shi et al., 2008 ). We found that ectopic expression of increasing amounts of Glut4 in undifferentiated preadipocytes does not lead to its marked translocation to the plasma membrane upon insulin stimulation. On the contrary, sortilin expressed in undifferentiated preadipocytes was localized in the IRVs and was translocated to the plasma membrane in response to insulin stimulation. Moreover, upon coexpression with Glut4, sortilin dramatically increased its insulin responsiveness to the levels observed in fully differentiated adipocytes. Thus sortilin may represent the key component of the IRVs, which is responsible not only for the formation of vesicles (Shi and Kandror, 2005 ; Ariga et al., 2008 ; Hatakeyama and Kanzaki, 2011 ), but also for their insulin responsiveness. It is worth noting that sortilin levels are significantly decreased in obese and diabetic humans and mice (Kaddai et al., 2009 ). We thus suggest that sortilin may be a novel and important target in the fight against insulin resistance and diabetes.Our experiments also demonstrate that undifferentiated preadipocytes lack a mechanism for the full intracellular retention of Glut4 that can be achieved by ectopic expression of AS160/TBC1D4.     

Structural basis of transport and inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum transporter PfFNT

In “Structural basis of transport and inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum transporter PfFNT” by Lyu et al (2021), the authors depict the inhibitor MMV007839 in its hemiketal form in Fig 3A and F, Fig 4C, and Appendix Figs S10A, B and S13. We note that Golldack et al (2017) reported that the linear vinylogous acid tautomer of MMV007839 constitutes the binding and inhibitory entity of PfFNT. The authors are currently obtaining higher resolution cryo‐EM structural data of MMV007839‐bound PfFNT to ascertain which of the interconvertible isoforms is bound and the paper will be updated accordingly.