A sex-ratio Meiotic Drive System in Drosophila simulans. II: An X-linked Distorter

The evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes creates a genetic condition favoring the invasion of sex-ratio meiotic drive elements, resulting in the biased transmission of one sex chromosome over the other, in violation of Mendel's first law. The molecular mechanisms of sex-ratio meiotic drive may therefore help us to understand the evolutionary forces shaping the meiotic behavior of the sex chromosomes. Here we characterize a sex-ratio distorter on the X chromosome (Dox) in Drosophila simulans by genetic and molecular means. Intriguingly, Dox has very limited coding capacity. It evolved from another X-linked gene, which also evolved de nova. Through retrotransposition, Dox also gave rise to an autosomal suppressor, not much yang (Nmy). An RNA interference mechanism seems to be involved in the suppression of the Dox distorter by the Nmy suppressor. Double mutant males of the genotype dox; nmy are normal for both sex-ratio and spermatogenesis. We postulate that recurrent bouts of sex-ratio meiotic drive and its subsequent suppression might underlie several common features observed in the heterogametic sex, including meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and achiasmy.     

A sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans. I: an autosomal suppressor

Sex ratio distortion (sex-ratio for short) has been reported in numerous species such as Drosophila, where distortion can readily be detected in experimental crosses, but the molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Here we characterize an autosomal sex-ratio suppressor from D. simulans that we designate as not much yang (nmy, polytene chromosome position 87F3). Nmy suppresses an X-linked sex-ratio distorter, contains a pair of near-perfect inverted repeats of 345 bp, and evidently originated through retrotransposition from the distorter itself. The suppression is likely mediated by sequence homology between the suppressor and distorter. The strength of sex-ratio is greatly enhanced by lower temperature. This temperature sensitivity was used to assign the sex-ratio etiology to the maturation process of the Y-bearing sperm, a hypothesis corroborated by both light microscope observations and ultrastructural studies. It has long been suggested that an X-linked sex-ratio distorter can evolve by exploiting loopholes in the meiotic machinery for its own transmission advantage, which may be offset by other changes in the genome that control the selfish distorter. Data obtained in this study help to understand this evolutionary mechanism in molecular detail and provide insight regarding its evolutionary impact on genomic architecture and speciation.     

A sex-ratio Meiotic Drive System in Drosophila simulans. I: An Autosomal Suppressor

Sex ratio distortion (sex-ratio for short) has been reported in numerous species such as Drosophila, where distortion can readily be detected in experimental crosses, but the molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Here we characterize an autosomal sex-ratio suppressor from D. simulans that we designate as not much yang (nmy, polytene chromosome position 87F3). Nmy suppresses an X-linked sex-ratio distorter, contains a pair of near-perfect inverted repeats of 345 bp, and evidently originated through retrotransposition from the distorter itself. The suppression is likely mediated by sequence homology between the suppressor and distorter. The strength of sex-ratio is greatly enhanced by lower temperature. This temperature sensitivity was used to assign the sex-ratio etiology to the maturation process of the Y-bearing sperm, a hypothesis corroborated by both light microscope observations and ultrastructural studies. It has long been suggested that an X-linked sex-ratio distorter can evolve by exploiting loopholes in the meiotic machinery for its own transmission advantage, which may be offset by other changes in the genome that control the selfish distorter. Data obtained in this study help to understand this evolutionary mechanism in molecular detail and provide insight regarding its evolutionary impact on genomic architecture and speciation.     

Natural variation of the Y chromosome suppresses sex ratio distortion and modulates testis-specific gene expression in Drosophila simulans

X-linked sex-ratio distorters that disrupt spermatogenesis can cause a deficiency in functional Y-bearing sperm and a female-biased sex ratio. Y-linked modifiers that restore a normal sex ratio might be abundant and favored when a X-linked distorter is present. Here we investigated natural variation of Y-linked suppressors of sex-ratio in the Winters systems and the ability of these chromosomes to modulate gene expression in Drosophila simulans. Seventy-eight Y chromosomes of worldwide origin were assayed for their resistance to the X-linked sex-ratio distorter gene Dox. Y chromosome diversity caused males to sire ∼63% to ∼98% female progeny. Genome-wide gene expression analysis revealed hundreds of genes differentially expressed between isogenic males with sensitive (high sex ratio) and resistant (low sex ratio) Y chromosomes from the same population. Although the expression of about 75% of all testis-specific genes remained unchanged across Y chromosomes, a subset of post-meiotic genes was upregulated by resistant Y chromosomes. Conversely, a set of accessory gland-specific genes and mitochondrial genes were downregulated in males with resistant Y chromosomes. The D. simulans Y chromosome also modulated gene expression in XXY females in which the Y-linked protein-coding genes are not transcribed. The data suggest that the Y chromosome might exert its regulatory functions through epigenetic mechanisms that do not require the expression of protein-coding genes. The gene network that modulates sex ratio distortion by the Y chromosome is poorly understood, other than that it might include interactions with mitochondria and enriched for genes expressed in post-meiotic stages of spermatogenesis.     

Recurrent Selection on the Winters sex-ratio Genes in Drosophila simulans

Selfish genes, such as meiotic drive elements, propagate themselves through a population without increasing the fitness of host organisms. X-linked (or Y-linked) meiotic drive elements reduce the transmission of the Y (X) chromosome and skew progeny and population sex ratios, leading to intense conflict among genomic compartments. Drosophila simulans is unusual in having a least three distinct systems of X chromosome meiotic drive. Here, we characterize naturally occurring genetic variation at the Winters sex-ratio driver (Distorter on the X or Dox), its progenitor gene (Mother of Dox or MDox), and its suppressor gene (Not Much Yang or Nmy), which have been previously mapped and characterized. We survey three North American populations as well as 13 globally distributed strains and present molecular polymorphism data at the three loci. We find that all three genes show signatures of selection in North America, judging from levels of polymorphism and skews in the site-frequency spectrum. These signatures likely result from the biased transmission of the driver and selection on the suppressor for the maintenance of equal sex ratios. Coalescent modeling indicates that the timing of selection is more recent than the age of the alleles, suggesting that the driver and suppressor are coevolving under an evolutionary “arms race.” None of the Winters sex-ratio genes are fixed in D. simulans, and at all loci we find ancestral alleles, which lack the gene insertions and exhibit high levels of nucleotide polymorphism compared to the derived alleles. In addition, we find several “null” alleles that have mutations on the derived Dox background, which result in loss of drive function. We discuss the possible causes of the maintenance of presence–absence polymorphism in the Winters sex-ratio genes.MEIOTIC drive can leave signatures in the genome similar to positive natural selection without increasing the fitness of an organism (Lyttle 1993). Drive elements are preferentially transmitted during meiosis by disrupting the development or function of sperm carrying the homologous chromosome (Zimmering et al. 1970, meiotic drive sensu lato), or by true chromosome segregation defects during meiosis (Sandler and Novitski 1957, meiotic drive sensu stricto; Tao et al. 2007a). While drive elements may arise on any chromosome, sex-linked drivers have higher population invasion probabilities than autosomal drivers and are more easily detected due to their impact on progeny sex ratios (Hurst and Pomiankowski 1991). To survive, a driver must maintain tight linkage with an insensitive target locus lest it drive against itself, a condition ensured by the lack of recombination between sex chromosomes (Charlesworth and Hartl 1978). Because of the impact drive elements have on sex ratios, sex-linked drivers are often referred to as “sex-ratio distorters” and the phenotype of skewed progeny sex ratios is termed “sex-ratio.” The mere transmission advantage of a driver, unless balanced by some detrimental fitness effect or masked by a suppressor, can cause it to sweep through a population in a manner similar to a positively selected mutation (Edwards 1961; Vaz and Carvalho 2004).Obviously, a complete sweep of a sex-linked driver dooms a male-less (or female-less) population to extinction (Hamilton 1967), and natural selection strongly favors genetic factors that suppress drive and restore Mendelian segregation. Fisher (1930) presented a qualitative argument for the maintenance of an equal sex ratio, which predicts selection on any heritable variant that increases the production of the rarer sex. Fisher''s principle has been formalized mathematically and demonstrated empirically (e.g., Bodmer and Edwards 1960; Carvalho et al. 1998). Suppressors have been identified in a wide variety of meiotic drive systems and are predicted to be strongly favored by natural selection for the maintenance of equal sex ratios (reviewed by Jaenike 2001). Furthermore, the evolution of linked enhancer genes may enable drivers to evade suppression, setting off another bout of Fisherian selection for equal sex ratios (Hartl 1975).Meiotic drive is widespread, with systems identified in mammals, insects, and plants (Jaenike 2001). Drosophila is the most extensively studied insect taxon, and sex-chromosome meiotic drive systems have been identified in more than a dozen species (Jaenike 2001). Cryptic (i.e., suppressed) distorters may be identified when the association between driver and suppressor is lost, such as in hybrids between species or populations that do not share meiotic drive systems (Mercot et al. 1995). The coevolutionary arms race between drivers and suppressors likely contributes to Haldane''s rule (the preferential sterility or inviability of heterogametic hybrids) and is a leading explanation for the importance of X-linked loci in causing hybrid male sterility (Frank 1991; Hurst and Pomiankowski 1991; Tao et al. 2007b; Presgraves 2008). Indeed, two recently characterized hybrid male sterility factors are also sex-ratio distorters—direct evidence of a link between meiotic drive and speciation (Tao et al. 2001; Orr and Irving 2005; Phadnis and Orr 2009).The three X-linked drive systems of Drosophila simulans are genetically distinct and have been termed Paris, Durham, and Winters (Tao et al. 2007a). Here, we focus on the Winters sex-ratio (SR), whose driver and suppressor have been mapped to the gene level and whose molecular and cellular features have been elucidated (Tao et al. 2007a,b). Distortion requires two genes, Distorter on the X (Dox) and Mother of Dox (MDox); Dox is a duplicate copy of MDox (Tao et al. 2007a; Y. Tao, personal communication). The dominant suppressor, Not Much Yang (Nmy), is a retrotransposed copy of Dox on chromosome 3R (Tao et al. 2007b). Nmy likely suppresses Dox through an RNA interference mechanism by forming a double stranded RNA with homology to the distorter RNAs (Tao et al. 2007b). The genes of the Winters sex-ratio are not found in D. melanogaster, which diverged from D. simulans ∼2.3 million years ago (Li et al. 1999). Initial surveys of the genes in the simulans clade indicate that a functional Nmy gene is present in D. mauritiana (Tao et al. 2007b). Thus, the Winters genes are >250,000 years old, the speciation time of D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia (McDermott and Kliman 2008).Signatures of positive selection have been previously detected at genomic regions linked to Drosophila sex-ratio distorters. However, this study represents the first evidence of selection acting directly on a sex-ratio distorter gene and its suppressor gene. In D. recens, driving X chromosomes show reduced nucleotide and haplotype variability relative to standard (nondriving) X chromosomes, and linkage disequilibrium extends over 130 cM of the driving chromosome (Dyer et al. 2007). The Paris driver has been localized to a pair of duplicated loci 150 kb apart; recent work shows reduced haplotype diversity and linkage disequilibrium between variants associated with drive (Derome et al. 2008). In this study, we characterize patterns of genetic variation in natural populations of North American D. simulans and find signatures of recent and strong positive selection at all three genes of the Winters sex-ratio.     

Sex-Ratio Meiotic Drive and Y-Linked Resistance in Drosophila affinis

Genetic elements that cheat Mendelian segregation by biasing transmission in their favor gain a significant fitness benefit. Several examples of sex-ratio meiotic drive, where one sex chromosome biases its own transmission at the cost of the opposite sex chromosome, exist in animals and plants. While the distorting sex chromosome gains a significant advantage by biasing sex ratio, the autosomes, and especially the opposite sex chromosome, experience strong selection to resist this transmission bias. In most well-studied sex-ratio meiotic drive systems, autosomal and/or Y-linked resistance has been identified. We specifically surveyed for Y-linked resistance to sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila affinis by scoring the sex ratio of offspring sired by males with a driving X and one of several Y chromosomes. Two distinct types of resistance were identified: a restoration to 50/50 sex ratios and a complete reversal of sex ratio to all sons. We confirmed that fathers siring all sons lacked a Y chromosome, consistent with previously published work. Considerable variation in Y-chromosome morphology exists in D. affinis, but we showed that morphology does not appear to be associated with resistance to sex-ratio meiotic drive. We then used two X chromosomes (driving and standard) and three Y chromosomes (susceptible, resistant, and lacking) to examine fertility effects of all possible combinations. We find that both the driving X and resistant and lacking Y have significant fertility defects manifested in microscopic examination of testes and a 48-hr sperm depletion assay. Maintenance of variation in this sex-ratio meiotic drive system, including both the X-linked distorter and the Y-resistant effects, appear to be mediated by a complex interaction between fertility fitness and transmission dynamics.     

Female-driven mechanisms,ejaculate size and quality contribute to the lower fertility of <Emphasis Type="Italic">sex-ratio</Emphasis> distorter males in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila simulans</Emphasis>

Background  

Sex-ratio meiotic drive refers to the preferential transmission of the X chromosome by XY males. The loss of Y-bearing sperm is caused by an X-linked distorter and results in female-biased progeny. The fertility of sex-ratio (SR) males expressing the distorter is usually strongly reduced compared to wild-type males, especially when they are in competition. The aim of this study was to identify the post-copulatory mechanisms that lower the fertility of SR males in Drosophila simulans. Parameters contributing to male fertility were measured in single and double mating conditions.     

THE CONTRIBUTION OF FEMALE MEIOTIC DRIVE TO THE EVOLUTION OF NEO‐SEX CHROMOSOMES

Sex chromosomes undergo rapid turnover in certain taxonomic groups. One of the mechanisms of sex chromosome turnover involves fusions between sex chromosomes and autosomes. Sexual antagonism, heterozygote advantage, and genetic drift have been proposed as the drivers for the fixation of this evolutionary event. However, all empirical patterns of the prevalence of multiple sex chromosome systems across different taxa cannot be simply explained by these three mechanisms. In this study, we propose that female meiotic drive may contribute to the evolution of neo‐sex chromosomes. The results of this study showed that in mammals, the XY₁Y₂ sex chromosome system is more prevalent in species with karyotypes of more biarmed chromosomes, whereas the X₁X₂Y sex chromosome system is more prevalent in species with predominantly acrocentric chromosomes. In species where biarmed chromosomes are favored by female meiotic drive, X‐autosome fusions (XY₁Y₂ sex chromosome system) will be also favored by female meiotic drive. In contrast, in species with more acrocentric chromosomes, Y‐autosome fusions (X₁X₂Y sex chromosome system) will be favored just because of the biased mutation rate toward chromosomal fusions. Further consideration should be given to female meiotic drive as a mechanism in the fixation of neo‐sex chromosomes.     

SUPPRESSION OF SEX-RATIO MEIOTIC DRIVE AND THE MAINTENANCE OF Y-CHROMOSOME POLYMORPHISM IN DROSOPHILA

Like several other species of Drosophila, D. quinaria is polymorphic for X-chromosome meiotic drive; matings involving males that carry a “sex-ratio” X chromosome (X^SR) result in the production of strongly female-biased offspring sex ratios (Jaenike 1996). A survey of isofemale lines of D. quinaria from several populations reveals that there is genetic variation for partial suppression of this meiotic drive. Crossing experiments show that there is Y-linked, and probably autosomal, variation for suppression of drive. Y-linked suppressors of X-chromosome drive have now been described in several species of Diptera. I develop a simple model for the maintenance of Y-chromosome polymorphism in species polymorphic for X-linked meiotic drive. One interesting feature of this model is that, if there is a stable Y-chromosome polymorphism, then the equilibrium frequency of the standard and sex-ratio X chromosomes is determined solely by Y-chromosome parameters, not by the fitness effects of the different X chromosomes on their carriers. This model suggests that Y-chromosome polymorphism may be easier to maintain than previously thought, and I hypothesize that karyotypic variation in Y chromosomes will be found to be associated with suppression of sex-ratio meiotic drive in other species of Drosophila.     

Transposition of the Responder Element (Rsp) of the Segregation Distorter System (Sd) to the X Chromosome in Drosophila Melanogaster

In order to test whether the meiotic drive system Segregation distorter (SD) can operate on the X chromosome to exclude it from functional sperm, we have transposed the Responder locus (Rsp) to this element. This was accomplished by inducing detachments of a compound-X chromosome in females carrying a Y chromosome bearing a Rsps allele. Six Responder-sensitive-bearing X chromosomes, with kappa values ranging from 0.90 to 1.00, were established as permanent lines. Two of these have been characterized more extensively with respect to various parameters affecting meiotic drive. SD males with a Responder-sensitive X chromosome produce almost exclusively male embryos, while those with a Rsp-Y chromosome produce almost exclusively female embryos. This provides a genetic system of great potential utility for the study of early sex-specific differentiation events as it allows the collection of large numbers of embryos of a given sex.     

Population genetics of modifiers of meiotic drive: IV. On the evolution of sex-ratio distortion.

A model for the evolution of the sex-ratio meiotic drive system in Drosophila is proposed and analyzed. The model incorporates genetic modification of meiotic drive and altered fertility in the carriers of the modified sex-ratio chromosomes. The condition that a sex-ratio modifying chromosome increase is that the relative change in the sex-ratio distortion overcome any relative fertility loss in carriers of the modifying chromosome. When no fertility differences are involved, the model predicts that any increase in distortion of the sex ratio will be favored.     

Heterochiasmy and the establishment of gsdf as a novel sex determining gene in Atlantic halibut

Atlantic Halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) has a X/Y genetic sex determination system, but the sex determining factor is not known. We produced a high-quality genome assembly from a male and identified parts of chromosome 13 as the Y chromosome due to sequence divergence between sexes and segregation of sex genotypes in pedigrees. Linkage analysis revealed that all chromosomes exhibit heterochiasmy, i.e. male-only and female-only meiotic recombination regions (MRR/FRR). We show that FRR/MRR intervals differ in nucleotide diversity and repeat class content and that this is true also for other Pleuronectidae species. We further show that remnants of a Gypsy-like transposable element insertion on chr13 promotes early male specific expression of gonadal somatic cell derived factor (gsdf). Less than 4.5 MYA, this male-determining element evolved on an autosomal FRR segment featuring pre-existing male meiotic recombination barriers, thereby creating a Y chromosome. Our findings indicate that heterochiasmy may facilitate the evolution of genetic sex determination systems relying on linkage of sexually antagonistic loci to a sex-determining factor.     

A test for meiotic drive in hybrids between Australian and Timor zebra finches

Meiotic drivers have been proposed as a potent evolutionary force underlying genetic and phenotypic variation, genome structure, and also speciation. Due to their strong selective advantage, they are expected to rapidly spread through a population despite potentially detrimental effects on organismal fitness. Once fixed, autosomal drivers are cryptic within populations and only become visible in between‐population crosses lacking the driver or corresponding suppressor. However, the assumed ubiquity of meiotic drivers has rarely been assessed in crosses between populations or species. Here we test for meiotic drive in hybrid embryos and offspring of Timor and Australian zebra finches—subspecies that have evolved in isolation for about two million years—using 38,541 informative transmissions of 56 markers linked to either centromeres or distal chromosome ends. We did not find evidence for meiotic driver loci on specific chromosomes. However, we observed a weak overall transmission bias toward Timor alleles at centromeres in females (transmission probability of Australian alleles of 47%, nominal p = 6 × 10^–5). While this is in line with the centromere drive theory, it goes against the expectation that the subspecies with the larger effective population size (i.e., the Australian zebra finch) should have evolved the more potent meiotic drivers. We thus caution against interpreting our finding as definite evidence for centromeric drive. Yet, weak centromeric meiotic drivers may be more common than generally anticipated and we encourage further studies that are designed to detect also small effect meiotic drivers.     

DIVERGENCE OF MEIOTIC DRIVE-SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS AS AN EXPLANATION FOR SEX-BIASED HYBRID STERILITY AND INVIABILITY

Two empirical generalizations about speciation remain unexplained: the tendency of the heterogametic sex to be sterile or inviable in F₁ hybrids (Haldane's rule), and the tendency of the X chromosome to harbor the genetic elements that cause this sex bias in hybrid fitness. I suggest that divergence of meiotic drive systems on the sex chromosomes can explain these observations. The theory follows from two simple facts. First, sex chromosomes are particularly susceptible to the forces of meiotic drive. Second, divergence of meiotic drive systems can cause hybrid sterility and in viability. The main objection to the theory is that meiotic drive is apparently rare, whereas the observed pattern of hybrid fitness is widespread. I answer this objection by showing that divergence of meiotic drive systems can explain the two generalizations even if large departures from Mendelian segregation are rarely observed.     

The Y chromosomes of Drosophila simulans are highly polymorphic for their ability to suppress sex-ratio drive

The sex-ratio trait, known in several species of Drosophila including D. simulans, results from meiotic drive of the X chromosome against the Y. Males that carry a sex-ratio X chromosome produce strongly female-biased progeny. In D. simulans, drive suppressors have evolved on the Y chromosome and on the autosomes. Both the frequency of sex-ratio X and the strength of the total drive suppression (Y-linked and autosomal) vary widely among geographic populations of this worldwide species. We have investigated the pattern of Y-linked drive suppression in six natural populations representative of this variability. Y-linked suppressors were found to be a regular component of the suppression, with large differences between populations in the mean level of suppression. These variations did not correspond to differences in frequency of discrete types of Y chromosomes, but to a more or less wide continuum of phenotypes, from nonsuppressor to partial or total suppressor. We concluded that a large diversity of Y-linked suppressor alleles exists in D. simulans and that some populations are highly polymorphic. Our results support the hypothesis that a Y-chromosome polymorphism can be easily maintained by a balance between meiotic drive and the cost of drive suppression.     

Sex Chromosome Drive

Sex chromosome drivers are selfish elements that subvert Mendel''s first law of segregation and therefore are overrepresented among the products of meiosis. The sex-biased progeny produced then fuels an extended genetic conflict between the driver and the rest of the genome. Many examples of sex chromosome drive are known, but the occurrence of this phenomenon is probably largely underestimated because of the difficulty to detect it. Remarkably, nearly all sex chromosome drivers are found in two clades, Rodentia and Diptera. Although very little is known about the molecular and cellular mechanisms of drive, epigenetic processes such as chromatin regulation could be involved in many instances. Yet, its evolutionary consequences are far-reaching, from the evolution of mating systems and sex determination to the emergence of new species.Meiotic drivers are selfish genetic elements that subvert Mendelian segregation during gametogenesis for their own benefit. They are passed on to most, if not all, of the functional gametes produced by heterozygotes. Therefore, drivers can increase in frequency and invade populations even if they reduce individual fitness, which is usually the case. The drivers are typically expressed in one sex, of which fertility is impaired. This also has deleterious consequences for the opposite sex and is expected to promote adaptations to counteract drive through sexual selection and sexual conflict. Furthermore, sex-linked meiotic drivers expressed in the heterogametic sex typically lead to biased offspring sex ratios, which represents an additional cost and can exacerbate the sexual conflict.Morgan et al. (1925) were the first to observe sex-biased offspring, which turned out to be caused by a sex-linked meiotic driver. Unfortunately, the Drosophila affinis strain was lost before any conclusive study could be performed. Later, Gershenson (1928) found that the offspring of some Drosophila obscura males were female biased. He showed that these males carried an X-linked genetic element (hereafter “sex ratio” or SR) responsible for the sex-ratio distortion, and showed that the SR did not affect the viability of the male offspring but acted as a gametic killer of Y-bearing sperm. Gamete killing or disabling is observed in males; in females, meiotic drive is usually a result of centromere competition for access to the egg.In its original definition (from Gershenson''s work and others), the term meiotic drive applies to the consequences of the mechanics of the meiotic divisions (Sandler and Novitski 1957). Here, under the term “sex chromosome drive,” we will include more broadly any case of preferential transmission that results directly or indirectly from an event that took place before, during, or after meiosis. Sex chromosome drive is different from sex-ratio adjustment, in which the favored chromosome is not the actor of its drive (West and Sheldon 2002). As emphasized by Sandler and Novitski (1957), it is also different from selection in the haploid phase as a consequence of the gamete''s intrinsic fitness.Only a few dozen cases of sex chromosome drive have been described, mainly in Drosophila and other Diptera (reviewed in Jaenike 2001; Burt and Trivers 2006). One possible explanation for the rarity of reported cases is that a biased sex ratio is not evolutionarily stable. Fisher (1930) predicted that natural selection will favor a 1:1 sex ratio, and that any deviation will be counterselected. This means that variants with counteracting effects can be selected at unlinked loci. Consistent with this prediction, autosomal drive suppressors and resistant Y chromosomes have been found in several Drosophila species (De Carvalho and Klaczko, 1994; Carvalho et al. 1997; Cazemajor et al. 1997). Three different cryptic X-linked SR systems have been described in the same species (Drosophila simulans: Paris, Winters, and Durham systems), showing that they can evolve repeatedly and be completely neutralized in the wild, remaining undetectable unless appropriate genetic crosses are performed (Merçot et al. 1995; Tao et al. 2001, 2007a). D. simulans also teaches us that the time window leading up to neutralization can be very narrow (Bastide et al. 2013). However, variants that enhance distortion can be selected if they are linked to the distorter. Inversions should prevent recombination with nondriving X chromosomes and keep together the loci that interact to induce drive, as found in D. pseudoobscura (Wu and Beckenbach 1983). These examples illustrate the extended genetic conflict that can result from the evolution of sex chromosome drive.Among the known cases of sex chromosome drive, X chromosome drive is much more common than Y chromosome drive. This may be because Y-linked drivers are always expressed, at each generation, unlike X-linked drivers. All else being equal, Y chromosome drive spreads faster and leads to a higher risk of extinction owing to the lack of females (Hamilton 1967). Furthermore, when the sex chromosomes are well differentiated, the Y chromosome usually has many fewer genes, which may provide fewer opportunities for a driver to evolve. On the other hand, heteromorphic sex chromosomes are expected to facilitate the evolution of meiotic drive. Indeed, the more divergent the sex chromosomes are, the less they recombine, reducing the risk of producing a suicide chromosome that carries both the driver and a sensitive allele at the target locus (Charlesworth and Hartl 1978; Frank 1991; Hurst and Pomiankowski 1991).     

EVOLUTION OF DRIVING X CHROMOSOMES AND RESISTANCE FACTORS IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA SIMULANS

Sex-ratio drive is a particular case of meiotic drive, described in several Drosophila species, that causes males bearing driving X chromosome to produce a large excess of females in their progeny. In Drosophila simulans, driving X chromosomes and resistance factors located on the Y chromosome and on the autosomes have been previously reported. In this paper, we report the study of the dynamics of sex-ratio factors in experimental populations. We followed the evolution in frequency of driving X chromosomes in the absence of resistance factors and the evolution of resistance factors in the presence of driving X chromosomes. The driving X chromosome was lost, contrarily to theoretical expectations that predict its rapid invasion. Autosomal resistances increased in frequency, and resistant Y chromosomes invaded the population very quickly, as predicted by theoretical models. Fitness measurements showed that the loss of the driving X chromosome was due to a strong deleterious effect that was expressed only when distorting males were in competition with standard males. However, the spread of autosomal resistances reduced this deleterious effect. Implications for the maintenance of polymorphism in natural populations are discussed.     

Genetic Dissection of Segregation Distortion II. Mechanism of Suppression of Distortion by Certain Inversions

In(2L+2R)Cy and In(2LR)Pm² are inversion-bearing chromosomes, the former carrying a paracentric inversion in each arm and the latter carrying a long pericentric. Both chromosomes produce normal segregation ratios when present in heterozygous males with certain segregation distorter chromosomes. The apparent suppression of distortion by these chromosomes was long attributed to a failure of synapsis, but this hypothesis has fallen out of favor recently because a large number of chromosome aberrations, particularly translocations and inversions, suppress distortion even though their breakpoints fall into no recognizable pattern. Although failure of synapsis does not appear to be the mechanism of suppression of distortion, what is responsible for the suppression remains unknown. In this paper it is shown that In(2L+2R)Cy and In(2LR)Pm² suppress segregation distortion because they carry Rsp, a component of the segregation distorter system that renders a chromosome insensitive to distortion. Both chromosomes induce "suicide" of chromosomes carrying Sd Rsp⁺.     

THE SEX-RATIO TRAIT IN DROSOPHILA SIMULANS: GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF DISTORTION AND RESISTANCE

The sex-ratio trait we describe here in Drosophila simulans results from X-linked meiotic drive. Males bearing a driving X chromosome can produce a large excess of females (about 90%) in their progeny. This is, however, rarely the case in the wild, where resistance factors, including autosomal suppressors and insensitive Y chromosomes, prevent the expression of the driver. In this study, we searched for drive and resistance factors in strains of Drosophila simulans collected all over the world. Driving X chromosomes were found in all populations whenever a good sample size was available. Their frequency may reach up to 60%. However, the presence of driving X chromosomes never results in an excess of females, due to the systematic co-occurrence of resistance factors. The highest frequencies of driving X chromosomes were observed in islands, while populations from East and Central Africa (the supposed center of origin of the species) showed the highest level of resistance. The geographical pattern of drive and resistance factors, as well as the results of crosses between strains from different geographical areas, suggest that the sex-ratio system described here has a unique and ancient origin in the species.     

Local dynamics of a fast‐evolving sex‐ratio system in Drosophila simulans

By distorting Mendelian transmission to their own advantage, X‐linked meiotic drive elements can rapidly spread in natural populations, generating a sex‐ratio bias. One expected consequence is the triggering of a co‐evolutionary arms race between the sex chromosome that carries the distorter and suppressors counteracting its effect. Such an arms race has been theoretically and experimentally established and can have many evolutionary consequences. However, its dynamics in contemporary populations is still poorly documented. Here, we investigate the fate of the young X‐linked Paris driver in Drosophila simulans from sub‐Saharan Africa to the Middle East. We provide the first example of the early dynamics of distorters and suppressors: we find consistent evidence that the driving chromosomes have been rising in the Middle East during the last decade. In addition, identical haplotypes are at high frequencies around the two co‐evolving drive loci in remote populations, implying that the driving X chromosomes share a recent common ancestor and suggesting that East Africa could be the cradle of the Paris driver. The segmental duplication associated with drive presents an unusual structure in West Africa, which could reflect a secondary state of the driver. Together with our previous demonstration of driver decline in the Indian Ocean where suppression is complete, these data provide a unique picture of the complex dynamics of a co‐evolutionary arms race currently taking place in natural populations of D. simulans.