Randomized study comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy and fine needle aspiration with high suction

H. Gerke, M. K. Rizk, A. D. Vanderheyden and C. S. Jensen
Randomized study comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy and fine needle aspiration with high suction
Objectives:  Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy (TCB) enables acquisition of tissue cores for histological assessment. Because of the rigid needle and the spring mechanism, tissue acquisition can be difficult from regions that require sharp angulation of the echoendoscope. Fine needle aspiration with high suction (FNAHS) has been proposed as a method to obtain histological tissue cores while affording the flexibility to obtain specimens even with extreme endoscope angulation. The objective was to compare prospectively these two methods in their ability to obtain specimens for histological assessment and in their diagnostic accuracy, including cytological diagnosis when achieved.
Methods:  Eighty lesions in 77 patients were amenable to transoesophageal, transgastric or transrectal biopsy and were randomized to TCB ( n  = 44) or FNAHS ( n  = 36). Each specimen was assessed for adequacy (scoring system where a score of 0 was no material, 1–2 was considered cytological, and 3–5 was considered histological). Follow-up information was obtained to establish a gold standard final diagnosis.
Results:  The median histological scores for FNAHS and TCB were 2 and 5, respectively. Histological cores were obtained in 95.3% of TCB, as opposed to 27.8% in the FNAHS group ( P  < 0.0001). Although the diagnostic accuracy for TCB was greater than that for FNAHS (88.3% and 77.8%, respectively), this was not statistically significant ( P  = 0.24).
Conclusion:  If histological information is required, TCB is superior to FNAHS. The difference in diagnostic accuracy did not reach statistical significance due to low numbers and the fact that FNAHS often enabled a cytological diagnosis.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has a diagnostic accuracy of 70-90%, depending on the site under evaluation. In order to improve EUS-guided tissue sampling a novel 19-gauge trucut-type needle has been designed to obtain core biopsies during EUS. We prospectively evaluated the safety and accuracy of EUS-FNA alone versus combined EUS-FNA and trucut needle biopsy (TNB) in patients referred to our Unit over a 3-year period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 159 patients underwent EUS-FNA alone (lesions<2 cm) or the combination of both sampling modalities (lesions>or=2 cm). The adequacy of sampling, sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracies of EUS-FNA or EUS-TNB alone and combined EUS-FNA/TNB were determined. RESULTS: Adequate samples were obtained by EUS-FNA, EUS-TNB and EUS-FNA/TNB in 91%, 88% and 97% of patients, respectively. From the pancreas (n=83), adequate samples were obtained by FNA in 94% and by TNB in 81%, compared with 87% and 92% from non-pancreatic sites (n=76), respectively. The combination of both techniques resulted in more adequate samples from non-pancreatic cases than EUS-FNA alone (P=0.044). The specificity was 100%. Overall accuracy for EUS-FNA alone was 77%, for EUS-TNB alone 73% and for EUS-FNA/TNB 91% (P=0.008). For pancreatic sampling, the accuracy of EUS-FNA alone was 77%, for EUS-TNB alone 56% and for EUS-FNA/TNB 83%. For non-pancreatic sampling, the accuracy for EUS-FNA alone was 78%, for EUS-TNB alone 83% and for EUS-FNA/TNB 95% (P=0.006). The complication rate was 0.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Combined EUS-FNA/TNB for lesions>or=2 cm improves adequacy of sampling and diagnostic accuracy compared with either technique alone and is safe.     

Comparative study of fine needle aspiration and fine needle capillary sampling of thyroid lesions

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether fine needle capillary (FNC) sampling gives quantitatively and qualitatively superior cytologic material as compared to the conventional technique of fine needle aspiration (FNA) when performed by a single aspirator. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional diagnostic test evaluation study. FNA and FNC were performed by a single operator on 200 diffuse and nodular thyroid lesions. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in favor of FNC was observed for the parameter amount of cellular material. For the rest of the parameters--background blood or clot, degree of cellular degeneration, degree of cellular trauma and retention of architecture--the average score favored FNC but was not statistically significant--i.e., smears prepared from FNC displayed cellular material that was more concentrated, less damaged and less likely to be obscured by blood. CONCLUSION: Although FNC sampling was diagnostic in a greater number of cases than FNA sampling, this study did not prove a clear superiority of FNC over FNA. Until greater experience shows clear sampling superiority of FNC alone, rather than performing only FNA in diffuse or nodular thyroid lesions, incorporating FNC into the second puncture will definitely improve the quality and quantity of material at the patient's first visit.     

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. Diagnostic utility and accuracy

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) is regarded as a safe and reliable procedure for diagnosing and staging of pancreatic neoplasms. This study retrospectively evaluated both the diagnostic utility and accuracy of pancreatic EUS-FNABs and potential cytologic pitfalls when using Diff-Quik stain for on-site evaluation. STUDY DESIGN: Pancreatic EUS-FNABs performed between 1995 and 1998 were identified from the files of the Department of Pathology. All patients were studied via a linear-array ultrasound endoscope with an FNAB device. Immediate evaluation of the specimen by a pathologist using air-dried slides and Diff-Quik stain was done on all cases. An average of five passes (range, three to nine) were performed. Five cytologic categories were identified: nondiagnostic, benign, atypical, suspicious and malignant. EUS disease staging, histologic correlation and clinical follow-up were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine consecutive pancreative FNABs were evaluated in the study period. The patients comprised 38 females and 31 males with a mean age of 65 years (range, 36-83). Histologic correlation was available on 40 patients, and follow-up was available on the remaining 29. The cytologic diagnoses included: 31 malignant, 8 suspicious, 6 atypical, 20 benign and 4 nondiagnostic. Forty-three cases were true positive, 9 were true negative, 2 were false positive, and 11 were false negative. The overall sensitivity was 80% and specificity was 82%. CONCLUSION: The study showed that cytologic evaluation of pancreatic EUS-FNABs has 80% sensitivity and 82% specificity. False negative diagnosis was usually due to sampling error. A nondiagnostic cytologic diagnosis should be rendered in the absence of adequate sampling of a lesion. On-site cytologic evaluation of EUS-FNABs aids in guaranteeing specimen adequacy, and the pathologist should be trained to evaluate Diff-Quik-stained samples.     

Transvaginal fine needle aspiration biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of transvaginal fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the evaluation of palpable gynecologic masses. STUDY DESIGN: Transvaginal FNABs from 1994 to 1999 were identified from the files of Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Histologic correlation was obtained using the Pathology Department's computer database. Two pathologists reviewed the pathologic samples. Pertinent clinical information was obtained by reviewing the medical records. RESULTS: Twenty-two transvaginal FNABs from 22 patients were studied. The patients' mean age was 59 years (range, 29-84). Most patients (77%) had a previous history of a gynecologic malignancy, and 73% had a previous total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The size of the lesion sampled was provided in 15 cases and ranged from <1 to 5.4 cm in diameter. The location of the mass was reported as follows: vaginal (10 cases), vaginal cuff (5), rectovaginal septum (2), cul-de-sac (1), fornix (1), vaginal apex (1), right side of pelvis (1), and not specified (1). The cytologic diagnoses were: negative for malignancy (10 cases), positive for malignancy (9) and unsatisfactory (3). Most cases (77%) had histologic correlation or clinical follow-up. There was one false negative and no false positive cytologic diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Cytologic interpretation of transvaginal FNAB is an effective toolfor the evaluation of palpable pelvic and vaginal masses. Its specificity and sensitivity are 100% and 88%, respectively.     

Percutaneous core needle biopsy vs. fine needle aspiration in diagnosing benign lung lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of percutaneous core needle biopsy (PCNB) in comparison with fine needle aspiration (FNA) in patients with benign pulmonary lesions. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was undertaken of computed tomography-guided PCNBs and FNAs performed between 1988 and 1997. Both FNA and PCNB biopsies were carried out sequentially at the same visit in every patient. RESULTS: A specific benign diagnosis was made in 10/60 cases (16.7%) by FNA and in 49/60 (81.7%) by PCNB. PCNB findings resulted in significant modification of the diagnosis established by FNA. The only significant complication encountered was pneumothorax, at a rate of 11.7%, which is compatible with that reported in the literature for complications induced by FNA alone. CONCLUSION: Radiologically guided PCNB is a safe procedure, can provide sufficient histologic material for a specific diagnosis of peripheral lung disease and can avoid more-invasive surgical procedures in many cases. Our experience demonstrated that the histologic analysis provided by PCNB can greatly increase the diagnostic accuracy in benign pulmonary diseases as compared with the yield of FNA.     

Metaplastic breast carcinoma. A diagnostic problem in fine needle aspiration biopsy.

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was used to evaluate a breast lump and enlarged lymph nodes in a woman with a prior history of lumpectomy on the contralateral breast and a recent negative mammogram. The FNA cytologic findings included markedly atypical fibroblast-like cells lying singly and in groups in a myxoid background, highly atypical multinucleated cells and numerous mitoses, features that were interpreted as a high-grade malignant mesenchymal tumor. The carcinomatous cells in the aspirates were only fully appreciated after histologic examination of the mastectomy specimen and the axillary lymph node metastases showed a dual differentiation consisting of both epithelial and mesenchymal components, leading to a final diagnosis of metaplastic carcinoma. Electron microscopic study of histologic samples confirmed the dual differentiation, and both keratin and vimentin intermediate filaments were recognized by immunohistochemical staining. The regional lymph node metastases were predominantly sarcomatous, which apparently is a rare event. The entity of metaplastic carcinoma is discussed in relation to other mixed epithelial-mesenchymal lesions of the breast, and the previous literature on this entity is briefly reviewed.     

Cytomorphologic features of angiosarcoma on fine needle aspiration biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To present the cytomorphologic features of angiosarcomas identified on fine needle aspiration biopsy, review the literature, and discuss the differential diagnosis and pitfalls involved in such cases. STUDY DESIGN: Fine needle aspirate smears from 11 cases (1 hepatic, 3 breast and 7 subcutaneous/soft tissue lesions of angiosarcomas from eight patients were reviewed. All cases had histologic confirmation of angiosarcoma. RESULTS: All aspirates were hypocellular, with predominantly single cells in a background of moderate to abundant amounts of blood. Nine cases had scattered inflammatory cells, primarily neutrophils, in the background. Six of the cases had rare small clusters of cells. The cells were oval, round or spindled, with eccentric, round to spindle-shaped nuclei and moderate to abundant amounts of pale blue-gray, vacuolated cytoplasm. The cells ranged from two to nine times the size of the background red blood cells. In four cases, malignant cells demonstrated intracytoplasmic hemosiderin deposits. Small nucleoli were identified in five cases, large nucleoli in one case and hyperchromasia in seven cases. Mitotic figures, erythrophagocytosis, acinarlike or vascular structures, and necrosis were not identified in any of the studied cases. In four cases, a definitive diagnosis of angiosarcoma was rendered on the fine needle aspiration specimen. In three other cases, the differential diagnosis remained between angiosarcoma and radiation change. CONCLUSION: The presence of scarce single pleomorphic cells in a bloody background should raise the diagnostic possibility of angiosarcoma. A definitive diagnosis of angiosarcoma is often difficult to render due to the paucity of diagnostic cells unless intracytoplasmic hemosiderin deposits can be identified. Multiple aspirations are often needed in order to obtain diagnostic material. In the setting of radiotherapy, it may be impossible to distinguish angiosarcoma from radiation change, and biopsy should be recommended.     

Fine needle aspiration biopsy for improving the diagnostic accuracy of cut needle biopsy of focal liver lesions

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in comparison to cut needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of malignancy of focal liver lesions. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 68 FNAB and 49 CNB procedures performed on 62 patients with focal liver lesions. RESULTS: Cytology permitted a diagnosis of the lesion in 78% of cases. When punctures with insufficient material were excluded (11), the diagnostic accuracy of FNAB was 93%. For the 49 patients who underwent both procedures, FNAB and CNB had the same diagnostic accuracy, 78%, when considered separately and of 88% when considered in combination. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value were similar for the 2 techniques. The negative predictive value was 64% for FNAB and CNB used separately and reached 78% when the 2 techniques were combined. There were no complications during the execution of FNAB and CNB. CONCLUSION: FNAB is an effective and safe method for the diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions, with diagnostic accuracy similar to that of CNB. When the 2 techniques are combined, the accuracy of the diagnosis of malignancy of focal liver lesions increases.     

Thoracic fine needle aspiration biopsy versus fine needle cutting biopsy. A comparative study of 40 patients

The fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy findings were compared with the results of fine needle cutting (FNC) biopsy in 40 patients. The lesions (38 pulmonary nodules, 1 mediastinal mass and one lytic rib lesion) were biopsied with 22-gauge Greene and 21-gauge E-Z-EM needles through a 19-gauge needle guide. The FNA biopsy findings were based on smears and cell blocks of material obtained with the Greene needles while the FNC biopsy findings were based on tissue cores obtained by the E-Z-EM needles. In 83% of the cases, both techniques yielded specimens with similar cellularity; in seven cases, the FNA samples were more cellular. Malignancy was diagnosed in 80% of the patients: by both techniques in 26 patients, by FNA biopsy only in 5 patients and by FNC biopsy only in 1 patient. The sensitivity of FNA biopsy was higher than that of FNC biopsy (96.8% vs. 84.3%). The specificity and predictive value of positive results were 100% for both techniques. The predictive value of negative results was higher for FNA biopsy (88.8% vs. 54.5%). The majority of FNC biopsy tissue cores consisted mostly of clotted blood, lung tissue and/or fibrous tissue and did not facilitate or improve the diagnosis. Those data suggest that the contribution of FNC biopsy to the diagnosis of thoracic neoplasms is very limited and that the performance of FNC biopsy with an E-Z-EM needle in addition to or instead of FNA biopsy is not justified.     

Diagnosis of gastric glomus tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy. A case report with cytologic,histologic and immunohistochemical studies

BACKGROUND: The majority of glomus tumor are small, benign neoplasms that arise from modified smooth muscle cells. They usually occur in the dermis or subcutis of the extremities. However, rare cases have been reported in the visceral locations, most often in the stomach. CASE: A 32-year-old woman presented with episodes of right upper quadrant pain. She was found to have a gastric tumor that was biopsied at another hospital, where the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) was made. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) performed at our institution revealed a gastric submucosal tumor that was then biopsied by fine needle aspiration (FNA). Cytology revealed cohesive clusters of uniform, round, small cells with ill-defined cytoplasmic borders and scanty, amphophilic cytoplasm. Nuclei were round, with smooth nuclear membranes and evenly distributed, dusty chromatin. Intermingled with those epithelioid cells were small, short, spindled, normal endothelial cells. Immunohistochemical studies performed on cell block showed that the tumor cells were negative for CD34, CD117, chromogranin, synaptophysin, desmin and AE1/AE3 and were strongly positive for SMA, HHF-35 and collagen type IV. Glomus tumor was diagnosed and later confirmed by histology. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided FNA biopsy is efficient and permits adequate sampling for accurate diagnosis of gastric glomus tumor. Although rare, glomus tumor should be in the differential diagnosis among other gastric lesions, such as well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, epithelioid GIST and carcinoid tumor.     

Utility of immediate evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transesophageal fine needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of immediate cytologic evaluation (ICE) in mediastinal endoscopic ultrasound-guided transesophageal fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). STUDY DESIGN: Fifty eight patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy underwent transesophageal EUS-FNA. Cellularity, number of needle passes and number of slides prepared were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of moderate to highly cellular passes, 75% were diagnostic. ICE had a 100% positive predictive value and 97% negative predictive value. ICE allowed a diagnosis in all cases. Calculated diagnostic accuracy was 70% if the procedure ended after a single specimen of at least moderate cellularity or after completion of 4 needle passes. CONCLUSION: Immediate cytologic evaluation of EUS-FNA specimens allowed a diagnosis in all cases and contributed to the utility of EUS-FNA as a diagnostic procedure for mediastinal adenopathy.     

Focal adenomatoid hyperplasia of salivary glands. A differential diagnostic problem in fine needle aspiration biopsy

Adenomatoid hyperplasia of minor salivary glands is an idiopathic lesion usually involving the palate and mimicking a primary salivary gland neoplasm. In particular, the lesions may resemble low-grade mucoepidermoid tumors clinically and by fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. An illustrative case is presented, and the nature of this unusual entity is reviewed. Its importance in the differential diagnosis of FNA biopsies of minor salivary gland lesions is also discussed.