Functional cloning and reconstitution of vertebrate odorant receptors

The olfactory systems of vertebrates have a remarkable capacity to recognize and discriminate thousands of different odorant molecules. The initial step in the process of odorant perception is the recognition of volatile odorant molecules by a group of roughly one thousand G protein-coupled odorant receptors that are expressed on the surface of olfactory neuronal cilia. The aims of this study were to obtain functional evidence that these putative odorant receptors recognize and respond to specific odorant molecules, and to elucidate the mechanisms of odorant discrimination in vertebrate olfaction at a receptor level. In order to identify odorant receptors that specifically recognize a particular odorant of interest, we developed a functional cloning strategy in an odorant-directed manner by combining Ca2+-recording and single cell RT-PCR techniques. We then adopted an adenovirus-mediated expression system or a chimeric receptor approach to reconstitute the functionally cloned receptors for further biochemical analyses. We herein describe how we obtained experimental evidence for a combinatory mechanism of odorant recognition by examining the diversity of odorant receptors that recognize a particular odorant of interest, and by determining ligand specificity and structure-function relationships for individual odorant receptors.     

Synergism of accessory factors in functional expression of mammalian odorant receptors

The discovery of odorant receptors led to endeavors in matching them with their cognate ligands. Although it has been challenging to functionally express odorant receptors in heterologous cells, previous studies have linked efficient odorant receptor expression with N-terminal modifications and accessory proteins, including the receptor-transporting proteins (RTPs) and Ric8b. Here we have shown that a shorter form of RTP1, RTP1S, supports robust cell-surface and functional expression of representative odorant receptors. Using a combination of accessory proteins, including RTP1S, Ric8b, and G(alphaolf), a diverse set of untagged odorant receptors were successfully expressed heterologously due to the synergistic effects among the various accessory proteins. Furthermore, the addition of an N-terminal rhodopsin tag to the odorant receptors, along with the same set of accessory proteins, exhibits an additional level of synergism, inducing enhanced odorant receptor responses to odorants and thus defining a more efficient heterologous expression system. We then showed that the presence or absence of different N-terminal tags has little effect on the ligand specificity of odorant receptors, although the amount of receptor expressed can play a role in the ligand response profile. The accuracy of the odorant receptor heterologous expression system involving tagged odorant receptors and various accessory proteins promises success in high throughput de-orphaning of mammalian odorant receptors.     

Experimental and numerical determination of odorant solubility in nasal and olfactory mucosa

Odorant deposition in the nasal and olfactory mucosas is dependent on a number of factors including local air/odorant flow distribution patterns, odorant mucosal solubility and odorant diffusive transport in the mucosa. Although many of these factors are difficult to measure, mucosal solubility in the bullfrog mucus has been experimentally determined for a few odorants. In the present study an experimental procedure was combined with computational fluid dynamic (CFD) techniques to further describe some of the factors that govern odorant mucosal deposition. The fraction of odorant absorbed by the nasal mucosa (eta) was experimentally determined for a number of odorants by measuring the concentration drop between odorant 'blown' into one nostril and that exiting the contralateral nostril while the subject performed a velopharyngeal closure. Odorant concentrations were measured with a photoionization detector. Odorants were delivered to the nostrils at flow rates of 3.33 and 10 l/min. The velopharyngeal closure nasal air/odorant flows were then simulated using CFD techniques in a 3-D anatomically accurate human nose modeland the mucosal odorant uptake was numerically calculated. The comparison between the numerical simulations and the experimental results lead to an estimation of the human mucosal odorant solubility and the mucosal effective diffusive transport resistance. The results of the study suggest that the increase in diffusive resistance of the mucosal layer over that of a thin layer of water seemed to be general and non-odorant-specific; however, the mucosa solubility was odorant specific and usually followed the trend that odorants with lower water solubility were more soluble in the mucosa than would be predicted from water solubility alone. The ability of this approach to model odorant movement in the nasal cavity was evaluated by comparison of the model output with known values of odorant mucosa solubility.     

Searching for the Ligands of Odorant Receptors

Through the sense of smell mammals can detect and discriminate between a large variety of odorants present in the surrounding environment. Odorants bind to a large repertoire of odorant receptors located in the cilia of olfactory sensory neurons of the nose. Each olfactory neuron expresses one single type of odorant receptor, and neurons expressing the same type of receptor project their axons to one or a few glomeruli in the olfactory bulb, creating a map of odorant receptor inputs. The information is then passed on to other regions of the brain, leading to odorant perception. To understand how the olfactory system discriminates between odorants, it is necessary to determine the odorant specificities of individual odorant receptors. These studies are complicated by the extremely large size of the odorant receptor family and by the poor functional expression of these receptors in heterologous cells. This article provides an overview of the methods that are currently being used to investigate odorant receptor–ligand interactions.     

Odorant-dependent, spatially restricted induction of c-fos in the olfactory epithelium of the mouse

Volatile odorous chemicals are detected by around a thousand different G protein-coupled odorant receptors in the mouse. We demonstrated that exposure of the behaving mouse to odorant for a few minutes led to induction of the immediate early gene c-fos for several hours in a fraction of the olfactory sensory neurones in the nasal cavity. Associated with this odorant-specific induction event was activation of extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 that preceded increased c-fos expression. The distribution of odorant-activated neurones mimicked the scattered and spatially limited distribution of neurones expressing a single odorant receptor gene. A small change in odorant chemical structure caused a zonal shift in the spatial distribution of activated neurones, suggesting that the gene expression change resulted from specific receptor interaction. Repeated exposure to odorant or use of different concentrations did not change the pattern of c-fos induction. These results indicate that odorant-induced c-fos expression can be used to visualize odorant representations in the olfactory epithelium that reflect late cellular events regulated by adequate odorant receptor stimulation.     

棉铃虫普通气味受体基因HarmOR9和HarmOR29的克隆和组织表达分析

【目的】对棉铃虫Helicoverpa armigera 2个普通气味受体基因的cDNA全长进行分析,明确这两个普通气味受体基因在不同组织中的表达分布,为进一步的功能研究奠定基础。【方法】利用PCR结合RACE技术克隆棉铃虫两条普通气味受体基因的cDNA全长;利用不同的生物信息学软件对序列进行结构预测、序列比对和进化树分析;利用半定量RT-PCR检测其在棉铃虫成虫不同组织中的表达。【结果】获得两条棉铃虫气味受体基因的全长序列,并命名为HarmOR9和HarmOR29（GenBank登录号分别为KJ188252和KJ188253）。序列分析显示,HarmOR9全长1 206 bp,编码401个氨基酸;HarmOR29全长1 188 bp,编码395个氨基酸。选择已报道的鳞翅目昆虫烟青虫Heliothis assulta、家蚕Bombyx mori、烟芽夜蛾Heliothis virescens和棉铃虫的气味受体与本实验克隆得到的两个气味受体基因的编码产物进行序列比对和进化树分析,结果显示这两个气味受体与性信息素受体区别明显,并与其他普通气味受体聚类在一起。半定量RT-PCR的结果显示HarmOR9与HarmOR29都主要在触角中高表达且无雌雄间差异,HarmOR29在其他组织中均不表达;而HarmOR9在雄虫下唇须中有微量表达,在其他组织中均不表达。【结论】本研究从棉铃虫中克隆得到2个气味受体基因HarmOR9和HarmOR29的cDNA全长,其编码产物具有气味受体的典型特征并且属于普通气味受体。明确了这两个气味受体基因都在棉铃虫成虫的触角中高表达,且无雌雄差异,推测其可能参与了棉铃虫普通气味的识别过程。     

Complexes of porcine odorant binding protein with odorant molecules belonging to different chemical classes

Porcine odorant binding protein (pOBP) is a monomer of 157 amino acid residues, purified in abundance from pig nasal mucosa. In contrast to the observation on lipocalins as retinol binding protein (RBP), major urinary protein (MUP) or bovine odorant binding protein (bOBP), no naturally occurring ligand was found in the beta-barrel cavity of pOBP. Porcine OBP was therefore chosen as a simple model for structure/function studies with odorant molecules. In competition experiments with tritiated pyrazine, the affinity of pOBP towards several odorant molecules belonging to different chemical classes has been found to be of the micromolar order, with a 1:1 stoichiometry. The X-ray structures of pOBP complexed to these molecules were determined at resolution between 2.15 and 1.4 A. As expected, the electron density of the odorant molecules was observed into the hydrophobic beta-barrel of the lipocalin. Inside this cavity, very few specific interactions were established between the odorant molecule and the amino acid side-chains, which did not undergo significant conformational change. The high B-factors observed for the odorant molecules as well as the existence of alternative conformations reveal a non-specific mode of binding of the odorant molecules in the cavity.     

Odorant binding initially occurring at the central pocket in bovine odorant-binding protein

Why bovine odorant-binding protein (OBPb), among OBP family, assumes a dimeric structure has been unclear. Here we clarified, by measuring the fluorescence of intrinsic tryptophan and tyrosine residues of intact OBPb and OBPb whose C-terminal 10 amino acids were deleted, that odorant enters the central pocket formed by the dimerization when OBPb first encounters odorant, and odorant with high affinity with OBPb subsequently enters the internal cavity (suggested binding site), releasing the pre-bound odorant. The internal cavity-bound odorant can be released by the binding of other odorants at another internal cavity or at the central pocket, depending on the binding odorants. Due to this mechanism enabled by the dimerization, OBPb is more reactive than other monomeric OBPs.     

Numerical simulations of odorant detection by biologically inspired sensor arrays

The antennules of many marine crustaceans enable them to rapidly locate sources of odorant in turbulent environmental flows and may provide biological inspiration for engineered plume sampling systems. A substantial gap in knowledge concerns how the physical interaction between a sensing device and the chemical filaments forming a turbulent plume affects odorant detection and filters the information content of the plume. We modeled biological arrays of chemosensory hairs as infinite arrays of odorant flux-detecting cylinders and simulated the fluid flow around and odorant flux into the hair-like sensors as they intercepted a single odorant filament. As array geometry and sampling kinematics were varied, we quantified distortion of the flux time series relative to the spatial shape of the original odorant filament as well as flux metrics that may be important to both organisms and engineered systems attempting to measure plume structure and/or identify chemical composition. The most important predictor of signal distortion is the ratio of sensor diameter to odorant filament width. Achieving high peak properties (e.g. sharpness) of the flux time series and maximizing the total number of odorant molecules detected appear to be mutually exclusive design goals. Sensor arrays inspired specifically by the spiny lobster Panulirus argus and mantis shrimp Gonodactylaceus falcatus introduce little signal distortion but these species' neural systems may not be able to resolve plume structure at the level of individual filaments via temporal properties of the odorant flux. Current chemical sensors are similarly constrained. Our results suggest either that the spatial distribution of flux across the aesthetasc array is utilized by P. argus and G. falcatus, or that such high spatiotemporal resolution is unnecessary for effective plume tracking.     

Micro-scale fluid and odorant transport to antennules of the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii

A numerical model was developed to determine advective-diffusive transport of odorant molecules to olfactory appendages of the crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. We tested the extent of molecule transport to the surfaces of aesthetasc sensilla during an antennule flick and the degree of odorant exchange during subsequent flicks. During the rapid downstroke of a flick, odorant molecules are advected between adjacent aesthetascs, while during the slower return stroke, these odorants are trapped between the sensilla and molecular diffusion occurs over a sufficient time period to transport odorants to aesthetasc surfaces. During subsequent flicks, up to 97.6?% of these odorants are replaced with new odorant molecules. The concentration of molecules captured along aesthetasc surfaces was found to increase with increased gap spacing between aesthetascs, flick speed, and distance from the proximal end of the aesthetasc, but these changes in morphology and flicking kinematics reduce the animal's ability to take discrete samples of the odorant-laden fluid environment with each flick. Results suggest that antennule flicking allows discrete sampling of the time- and space-varying odorant signal, and high concentration odorant filaments can be distinguished from more diffuse, low concentration filaments through changes in both the timing and the encounter rate of odorant molecules to aesthetasc surfaces.     

Onset of odorant receptor gene expression during olfactory sensory neuron regeneration

Individual olfactory sensory neurons are thought to express only one odorant receptor gene from a repertoire of hundreds to thousands of genes. How do these sensory neurons choose just one specific odorant receptor to express during their differentiation? As an initial attempt toward understanding the process of odorant receptor gene regulation, we studied when odorant receptor expression is activated during sensory neuron regeneration. We find that receptor gene expression is activated in postmitotic neurons and can occur in the absence of the olfactory bulb. These results suggest that receptor expression is restricted to the terminal stages of olfactory neuron differentiation, and sensory neurons do not simply inherit the odorant receptor that is already expressed in mitotic precursor cells. Our results also support a model in which odorant receptor gene expression occurs independent of the olfactory bulb.     

Anatomical contributions to odorant sampling and representation in rodents: zoning in on sniffing behavior

Odorant sampling behaviors such as sniffing bring odorant molecules into contact with olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) to initiate the sensory mechanisms of olfaction. In rodents, inspiratory airflow through the nose is structured and laminar; consequently, the spatial distribution of adsorbed odorant molecules during inspiration is predictable. Physicochemical properties such as water solubility and volatility, collectively called sorptiveness, interact with behaviorally regulable variables such as inspiratory flow rate to determine the pattern of odorant deposition along the inspiratory path. Populations of ORNs expressing the same odorant receptor are distributed in strictly delimited regions along this inspiratory path, enabling different deposition patterns of the same odorant to evoke different patterns of neuronal activation across the olfactory epithelium and in the olfactory bulb. We propose that both odorant sorptive properties and the regulation of sniffing behavior may contribute to rodents' olfactory capacities by this mechanism. In particular, we suggest that the motor regulation of sniffing behavior is substantially utilized for purposes of "zonation" or the direction of odorant molecules to defined intranasal regions and hence toward distinct populations of receptor neurons, pursuant to animals' sensory goals.     

Dose-response relationships in an olfactory flux detector model revisited

A simple model of an odorant flux detector including odorant uptake, activation of odorant receptor molecules and enzymatic odorant deactivation can produce different types of static dose-response relationships. Depending on the binding characteristics of the odorant to the receptor molecule and to the deactivating enzyme, the receptor occupation by the odorant as related to the odorant uptake is quasi-hyperbolic, linear or, close to saturation, steeper than linear. In Rospars et al. (2003, Chem. Senses, 28: 509-522) a note contributed by both of us stated erroneously that an equation describing these relationships given previously (Kaissling, 1998, Chem. Senses, 23; 99-111; Kaissling, 2001, Chem. Senses, 26: 125-150) was incorrect. We show here that the difference in equations was due to a simplifying assumption in Rospars et al. (2003) about the deactivating enzyme, we summarize briefly the properties of the correct equation of Kaissling (1998, 2001) and we discuss the relation with the model studied in Rospars et al. (2003).     

Statistical approach in search for optimal signal in simple olfactory neuronal models

Several models (concentration detectors and a flux detector) for coding of odor intensity in olfactory sensory neurons are investigated. Behavior of the system is described by different stochastic processes of binding the odorant molecules to the receptors and their activation. Characteristics how well the odorant concentration can be estimated from the knowledge of response, the number of activated neurons, are studied. The approach is based on the Fisher information and analogous measures. These measures of optimality are computed and applied to locate the odorant concentration which is most suitable for coding. The results are compared with the classical deterministic approach which judges the optimal odorant concentration via steepness of the input-output function.     

Identification of specific ligands for orphan olfactory receptors. G protein-dependent agonism and antagonism of odorants

Olfactory receptors are the largest group of orphan G protein-coupled receptors with an infinitely small number of agonists identified out of thousands of odorants. The de-orphaning of olfactory receptor (OR) is complicated by its combinatorial odorant coding and thus requires large scale odorant and receptor screening and establishing receptor-specific odorant profiles. Here, we report on the stable reconstitution of OR-specific signaling in HeLa/Olf cells via G protein alphaolf and adenylyl cyclase type-III to the Ca2+ influx-mediating olfactory cyclic nucleotide-gated CNGA2 channel. We demonstrate the central role of Galphaolf in odorant-specific signaling out of OR. The employment of the non-typical G protein alpha15 dramatically altered the odorant specificities of 3 of 7 receptors that had been characterized previously by different groups. We further show for two OR that an odorant may be an agonist or antagonist, depending on the G protein used. HeLa/Olf cells proved suitable for high-throughput screening in fluorescence-imaging plate reader experiments, resulting in the de-orphaning of two new OR for the odorant (-)citronellal from an expression library of 93 receptors. To demonstrate the G protein dependence of its odorant response pattern, we screened the most sensitive (-)citronellal receptor Olfr43 versus 94 odorants simultaneously in the presence of Galpha15 or Galphaolf. We finally established an EC50-ranking odorant profile for Olfr43 in HeLa/Olf cells. In summary, we conclude that, in heterologous systems, odorants may function as agonists or antagonists, depending on the G protein used. HeLa/Olf cells provide an olfactory model system for functional expression and de-orphaning of OR.     

Functional expression and characterization of odorant receptors using the Semliki Forest virus system

The human olfactory system can recognize and discriminate a large number of different odorant molecules. The detection of chemically distinct odorants starts with the binding of an odorant ligand to a specific receptor protein on the olfactory neuron cell surface. To address the problem of olfactory perception at a molecular level, we have expressed and characterized different olfactory receptors with several expression systems. Here we provide the first documentation of functional expression of odorant receptors using the Semliki Forest virus system. The human odorant OR 17-40 receptor and the rat 17 receptor were functionally expressed in vertebrate kidney cells (HEK293) using recombinant Semliki Forest viruses. Receptors were expressed as a fusion protein with the N-terminal membrane import sequence of the guinea pig serotonin receptor. Experiments employing the Ca2+-sensitive dye fura-2 revealed a fast, transient increase in the [Ca2+]i after application of the specific agonists helional and octanal to HEK293 cells infected with viruses containing RNA for the human odorant OR 17-40 receptor and the rat 17 receptor, respectively.     

Ca-modulated ONE-GC odorant signal transduction

In a subset of olfactory epithelium the odorant receptor guanylate cyclase, ONE-GC, is a central transduction component of the cyclic GMP signaling pathway. The odorant binds to the extracellular domain and activates its intracellular catalytic domain to generate the odorant second messenger, cyclic GMP. The present study demonstrates that it is a two-step, Ca²⁺-independent and Ca²⁺-dependent, sequential process. In step one, the odorant, uroguanylin, binds ONE-GC and primes it for stimulation. In step two, Ca²⁺-bound neurocalcin δ binds to the defined intracellular domain and saturates ONE-GC activity. A prototype model is proposed that depicts this signal transduction process.     

Numerical modeling of turbulent and laminar airflow and odorant transport during sniffing in the human and rat nose

Human sniffing behavior usually involves bouts of short, high flow rate inhalation (>300 ml/s through each nostril) with mostly turbulent airflow. This has often been characterized as a factor enabling higher amounts of odorant to deposit onto olfactory mucosa than for laminar airflow and thereby aid in olfactory detection. Using computational fluid dynamics human nasal cavity models, however, we found essentially no difference in predicted olfactory odorant flux (g/cm2 s) for turbulent versus laminar flow for total nasal flow rates between 300 and 1000 ml/s and for odorants of quite different mucosal solubility. This lack of difference was shown to be due to the much higher resistance to lateral odorant mass transport in the mucosal nasal airway wall than in the air phase. The simulation also revealed that the increase in airflow rate during sniffing can increase odorant uptake flux to the nasal/olfactory mucosa but lower the cumulative total uptake in the olfactory region when the inspired air/odorant volume was held fixed, which is consistent with the observation that sniff duration may be more important than sniff strength for optimizing olfactory detection. In contrast, in rats, sniffing involves high-frequency bouts of both inhalation and exhalation with laminar airflow. In rat nose odorant uptake simulations, it was observed that odorant deposition was highly dependent on solubility and correlated with the locations of different types of receptors.     

Functional analysis of a mammalian odorant receptor subfamily

Phylogenetic analysis groups mammalian odorant receptors into two broad classes and numerous subfamilies. These subfamilies are proposed to reflect functional organization. Testing this idea requires an assay allowing detailed functional characterization of odorant receptors. Here we show that a variety of Class I and Class II mouse odorant receptors can be functionally expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Receptor constructs included the N-terminal 20 residues of human rhodopsin and were co-expressed with Galphaolf and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator to allow electrophysiological measurement of receptor responses. For most mouse odorant receptors tested, these conditions were sufficient for functional expression. Co-expression of accessory proteins was required to allow functional surface expression of some mouse odorant receptors. We used this assay to examine the receptive ranges of all members of the mouse odorant receptor 42 (MOR42) subfamily. MOR42-1 responded to dicarboxylic acids, preferring a 10-12 carbon chain length. MOR42-2 responded to monocarboxylic acids (7-10 carbons). MOR42-3 responded to dicarboxylic acids (8-10 carbons) and monocarboxylic acids (10-12 carbons). Thus, the receptive range of each receptor was unique. However, overlap between the individual receptive ranges suggests that the members of this subfamily form one contiguous subfamily receptive range, suggesting that odorant receptor subfamilies do constitute functional units.