Mechanisms of agonism and inverse agonism at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors

Mechanisms of agonist and inverse agonist action at the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor have been studied using the modulation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in membranes of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the receptor (CHO-5-HTA1A cells). A range of agonists increased [35S]GTPgammaS binding with different potencies and to different maximal extents, whereas two compounds, methiothepin and spiperone, inhibited both agonist-stimulated and basal [5S]GTPgammaS binding, thus exhibiting inverse agonism. Potencies of agonists to stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding in membranes from CHO-5-HT1A cells were reduced by adding increasing concentrations of GDP to assays, whereas changes in sodium ion concentration did not affect agonist potency. The maximal effect of the agonists was increased by increasing sodium ion concentrations. The affinities of agonists in ligand binding assays were unaffected by changes in sodium ion concentration. Increasing GDP in the assays of the inverse agonists increased potency for spiperone to inhibit [35S]GTPgammaS binding and had no effect for methiothepin, in agreement with the sensitivity of these compounds to guanine nucleotides in ligand binding assays. Potencies for these inverse agonists were unaffected by changes in sodium ion concentration. These data were simulated using the extended ternary complex model. These simulations showed that the data obtained with agonists were consistent with these compounds achieving agonism by stabilising the ternary complex. For inverse agonists, the simulations showed that the mechanism for spiperone may be to stabilise forms of the receptor uncoupled from G proteins. Methiothepin, however, probably does not alter the equilibrium distribution of different receptor species; rather, this inverse agonist may stabilise an inactive form of the receptor that can still couple to G protein.     

Mechanisms of inverse agonism of antipsychotic drugs at the D(2) dopamine receptor: use of a mutant D(2) dopamine receptor that adopts the activated conformation

The antipsychotic drugs have been shown to be inverse agonists at the D(2) dopamine receptor. We have examined the mechanism of this inverse agonism by making mutations in residue T343 in the base of the sixth transmembrane spanning region of the receptor. T343R, T343S and T343K mutant D(2) dopamine receptors were made and the T343R mutant characterized in detail. The T343R mutant D(2) dopamine receptor exhibits properties of a receptor that resides more in the activated state, namely increased agonist binding affinity (independent of G-protein coupling and dependent on agonist efficacy), increased agonist potency in functional tests (adenylyl cyclase inhibition) and increased inverse agonist effects. The binding of agonists to the mutant receptor also shows sensitivity to sodium ions, unlike the native receptor, so that isomerization of the receptor to its inactive state may be driven by sodium ions. The binding of inverse agonists to the receptor is, however, unaffected by the mutation. We conclude that inverse agonism at this receptor is not achieved by the inverse agonist binding preferentially to the non-activated state of the receptor over the activated state. Rather the inverse agonist appears to bind to all forms of the receptor but then renders the receptor inactive.     

Metal ion-mediated agonism and agonist enhancement in melanocortin MC1 and MC4 receptors

An endogenous metal-ion site in the melanocortin MC1 and MC4 receptors was characterized mainly in transiently transfected COS-7 cells. ZnCl(2) alone stimulated signaling through the Gs pathway with a potency of 11 and 13 microm and an efficacy of 50 and 20% of that of alpha-melanocortin stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) in the MC1 and MC4 receptors, respectively. In the presence of peptide agonist, Zn(II) acted as an enhancer on both receptors, because it shifted the dose-response curves to the left: most pronounced was a 6-fold increase in alpha-MSH potency on the MC1 receptor. The effect of the metal ion appeared to be additive, because the maximal cAMP response for alpha-MSH in the presence of Zn(II) was 60% above the maximal response for the peptide alone. The affinity of Zn(II) could be increased through binding of the metal ion in complex with small hydrophobic chelators. The binding affinities and profiles were similar for a number of the 2,2'-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline analogs in complex with Zn(II) in the MC1 and MC4 receptors. However, the potencies and efficacies of the metal-ion complexes were very different in the two receptors, and close to full agonism was obtained in the MC1 receptor. Metal ion-chelator complexes having antagonistic properties were also found. An initial attempt to map the metal-ion binding site in the MC1 receptor indicated that Cys(271) in extracellular loop 3 and possibly Asp(119) at the extracellular end of TM-III, which are both conserved among all MC receptors, are parts of the site. It is concluded that the function of the MC1 and MC4 receptors can be positively modulated by metal ions acting both as partial agonists and as potentiators for other agonists, including the endogenous peptide ligand alpha-MSH at Zn(II) concentrations that could be physiological. Furthermore, the metal ion-chelator complexes may serve as leads in the development of novel melanocortin receptor modulators.     

Mechanistic origin of partial agonism of tetrahydrocannabinol for cannabinoid receptors

Cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB₁) is a therapeutically relevant drug target for controlling pain, obesity, and other central nervous system disorders. However, full agonists and antagonists of CB₁ have been reported to cause serious side effects in patients. Therefore, partial agonists have emerged as a viable alternative as they can mitigate overstimulation and side effects. One of the key bottlenecks in the design of partial agonists, however, is the lack of understanding of the molecular mechanism of partial agonism itself. In this study, we examine two mechanistic hypotheses for the origin of partial agonism in cannabinoid receptors and predict the mechanistic basis of partial agonism exhibited by Δ⁹-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) against CB₁. In particular, we inspect whether partial agonism emerges from the ability of THC to bind in both agonist and antagonist-binding poses or from its ability to only partially activate the receptor. We used extensive molecular dynamics simulations and Markov state modeling to capture the THC binding in both antagonist and agonist-binding poses in the CB₁ receptor. Furthermore, we predict that binding of THC in the agonist-binding pose leads to rotation of toggle switch residues and causes partial outward movement of intracellular transmembrane helix 6 (TM6). Our simulations also suggest that the alkyl side chain of THC plays a crucial role in determining partial agonism by stabilizing the ligand in the agonist and antagonist-like poses within the pocket. Taken together, this study provides important insights into the mechanistic origin of the partial agonism of THC.     

Differential bonding interactions of inverse agonists of angiotensin II type 1 receptor in stabilizing the inactive state

Although the sartan family of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockers (ARBs), which includes valsartan, olmesartan, and losartan, have a common pharmacophore structure, their effectiveness in therapy differs. Although their efficacy may be related to their binding strength, this notion has changed with a better understanding of the molecular mechanism. Therefore, we hypothesized that each ARB differs with regard to its molecular interactions with AT(1) receptor in inducing inverse agonism. Interactions between valsartan and residues Ser(105), Ser(109), and Lys(199) were important for binding. Valsartan is a strong inverse agonist of constitutive inositol phosphate production by the wild-type and N111G mutant receptors. Substituted cysteine accessibility mapping studies indicated that valsartan, but not losartan, which has only weak inverse agonism, may stabilize the N111G receptor in an inactive state upon binding. In addition, the inverse agonism by valsatan was mostly abolished with S105A/S109A/K199Q substitutions in the N111G background. Molecular modeling suggested that Ser(109) and Lys(199) bind to phenyl and tetrazole groups of valsartan, respectively. Ser(105) is a candidate for binding to the carboxyl group of valsartan. Thus, the most critical interaction for inducing inverse agonism involves transmembrane (TM) V (Lys(199)) of AT(1) receptor although its inverse agonist potency is comparable to olmesartan, which bonds with TM III (Tyr(113)) and TM VI (His(256)). These results provide new insights into improving ARBs and development of new G protein-coupled receptor antagonists.     

Inverse, protean, and ligand-selective agonism: matters of receptor conformation.

Concepts regarding the mechanisms by which drugs activate receptors to produce physiological response have progressed beyond considering the receptor as a simple on-off switch. Current evidence suggests that the idea that agonists produce only varying degrees of receptor activation is obsolete and must be reconciled with data to show that agonist efficacy has texture as well as magnitude. Thus, agonists can block system constitutive response (inverse agonists), behave as positive and inverse agonists on the same receptor (protean agonists), and differ in the stimulus pattern they produce in physiological systems (ligand-selective agonists). The molecular mechanism for this seemingly diverse array of activities is the same, namely, the selective microaffinity of ligands for different conformational states of the receptor. This paper reviews evidence for the existence of the various types of agonism and the potential therapeutic utility of different agonist types.-Kenakin, T. Inverse, protean, and ligand-selective agonism: matters of receptor conformation.     

Constitutive precoupling to G(i) and increased agonist potency in the alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor

The human alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor (alpha(2B)-AR) was mutated by substituting the D(3.49) aspartate in position 109 with an alanine (alpha(2B)-D109A) in the conserved DRY sequence at the cytoplasmic face of TM3. We studied the effects of the mutation on agonist binding and on receptor activation in CHO cells, including possible inverse agonism monitored by measuring intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations ([Ca(2+)](i)). The mutated receptor had increased binding affinity for agonists, especially dexmedetomidine (3.8-fold). The increased affinity was abolished by pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin. The mutation produced constitutive receptor activity evidenced as increased basal [Ca(2+)](i) and increased potency and efficacy of agonists to elicit Ca(2+) responses. The imidazoline derivative RX821002 functioned as an inverse agonist only through the alpha(2B)-D109A, reducing [Ca(2+)](i). The results thus indicate that this mutation causes constitutive receptor-G(i)-protein precoupling, and that the D(3.49) aspartate residue of the DRY motif is involved in controlling coupled and uncoupled conformations of alpha(2B)-AR.     

Unique interaction pattern for a functionally biased ghrelin receptor agonist

Based on the conformationally constrained D-Trp-Phe-D-Trp (wFw) core of the prototype inverse agonist [D-Arg(1),D-Phe(5),D-Trp(7,9),Leu(11)]substance P, a series of novel, small, peptide-mimetic agonists for the ghrelin receptor were generated. By using various simple, ring-constrained spacers connecting the D-Trp-Phe-D-Trp motif with the important C-terminal carboxyamide group, 40 nm agonism potency was obtained and also in one case (wFw-Isn-NH(2), where Isn is isonipecotic acid) ~80% efficacy. However, in contrast to all previously reported ghrelin receptor agonists, the piperidine-constrained wFw-Isn-NH(2) was found to be a functionally biased agonist. Thus, wFw-Isn-NH(2) mediated potent and efficacious signaling through the Gα(q) and ERK1/2 signaling pathways, but in contrast to all previous ghrelin receptor agonists it did not signal through the serum response element, conceivably the Gα(12/13) pathway. The recognition pattern of wFw-Isn-NH(2) with the ghrelin receptor also differed significantly from that of all previously characterized unbiased agonists. Most importantly, wFw-Isn-NH(2) was not dependent on GluIII:09 (Glu3.33), which otherwise is an obligatory TM III anchor point residue for ghrelin agonists. Molecular modeling and docking experiments indicated that wFw-Isn-NH(2) binds in the classical agonist binding site between the extracellular segments of TMs III, VI, and VII, interacting closely with the aromatic cluster between TMs VI and VII, but that it does so in an opposite orientation as compared with, for example, the wFw peptide agonists. It is concluded that the novel peptide-mimetic ligand wFw-Isn-NH(2) is a biased ghrelin receptor agonist and that the selective signaling pattern presumably is due to its unique receptor recognition pattern lacking interaction with key residues especially in TM III.     

Molecular basis of melanocortin-4 receptor for AGRP inverse agonism

We have investigated receptor structural components of the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) responsible for ligand-dependent inverse agonism. We utilized agouti-related protein (AGRP), an inverse agonist which reduces MC4R basal cAMP production, as a tool to determine the molecular mechanism. We tested a series of chimeric receptors and utilized MC4R and MC1R as templates, in which AGRP is an inverse agonist for MC4R but not for MC1R. Our results indicate that replacements of the extracellular loops 1, 2 and 3 of MC4R with the corresponding regions of MC1R did not affect AGRP inverse agonist activity. However, replacement of the N terminus of MC4R with the same region of MC1R decreases AGRP inverse agonism. Replacement of transmembrane domains 3, 4, 5 and 6 of MC4R with the corresponding regions of MC1R did not affect AGRP inverse agonist activity but mutation of D90A in transmembrane 2 (TM2) and D298A in TM7 abolished AGRP inverse activity. Deletion of the distal MC4R C terminus fails to maintain AGRP mediated reduction in basal cAMP production although it maintains NDP-MSH mediated cAMP production. In conclusion, our results indicate that the N terminus and the distal C terminus of MC4R do appear to play important roles in AGRP inverse agonism but not NDP-MSH mediated receptor activation. Our results also indicate that the residues D90 in TM2 and D298 in TM7 of hMC4R are involved in not only NDP-MSH mediated receptor activation but also AGRP mediated inverse agonism.     

Structural determinants for interaction of partial agonists with acetylcholine binding protein and neuronal α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

The pentameric acetylcholine‐binding protein (AChBP) is a soluble surrogate of the ligand binding domain of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Agonists bind within a nest of aromatic side chains contributed by loops C and F on opposing faces of each subunit interface. Crystal structures of Aplysia AChBP bound with the agonist anabaseine, two partial agonists selectively activating the α7 receptor, 3‐(2,4‐dimethoxybenzylidene)‐anabaseine and its 4‐hydroxy metabolite, and an indole‐containing partial agonist, tropisetron, were solved at 2.7–1.75 Å resolution. All structures identify the Trp 147 carbonyl oxygen as the hydrogen bond acceptor for the agonist‐protonated nitrogen. In the partial agonist complexes, the benzylidene and indole substituent positions, dictated by tight interactions with loop F, preclude loop C from adopting the closed conformation seen for full agonists. Fluctuation in loop C position and duality in ligand binding orientations suggest molecular bases for partial agonism at full‐length receptors. This study, while pointing to loop F as a major determinant of receptor subtype selectivity, also identifies a new template region for designing α7‐selective partial agonists to treat cognitive deficits in mental and neurodegenerative disorders.     

Identification of determinants of inverse agonism in a constitutively active parathyroid hormone/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor by photoaffinity cross-linking and mutational analysis.

We have investigated receptor structural components responsible for ligand-dependent inverse agonism in a constitutively active mutant of the human parathyroid hormone (PTH)/parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) receptor type 1 (hP1R). This mutant receptor, hP1R-H223R (hP1R(CAM-HR)), was originally identified in Jansen's chondrodysplasia and is altered in transmembrane domain (TM) 2. We utilized the PTHrP analog, [Bpa(2),Ile(5),Trp(23),Tyr(36)]PTHrP-(1-36)-amide (Bpa(2)-PTHrP-(1-36)), which has valine 2 replaced by p-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine (Bpa); this substitution renders the peptide a photoreactive inverse agonist at hP1R(CAM-HR). This analog cross-linked to hP1R(CAM-HR) at two contiguous receptor regions as follows: the principal cross-link site (site A) was between receptor residues Pro(415)-Met(441), spanning the TM6/extracellular loop three boundary; the second cross-link site (site B) was within the TM4/TM5 region. Within the site A interval, substitution of Met(425) to Leu converted Bpa(2)-PTHrP-(1-36) from an inverse agonist to a weak partial agonist; this conversion was accompanied by a relative shift of cross-linking from site A to site B. The functional effect of the M425L mutation was specific for Bpa(2)-containing analogs, as inverse agonism of Bpa(2)-PTH-(1-34) was similarly eliminated, whereas inverse agonism of [Leu(11),d-Trp(12)]PTHrP-(5-36) was not affected. Overall, our data indicate that interactions between residue 2 of the ligand and the extracellular end of TM6 of the hP1R play an important role in modulating the conversion between active and inactive receptor states.     

Role of the extracellular amino terminus and first membrane-spanning helix of dopamine D1 and D5 receptors in shaping ligand selectivity and efficacy

Transmembrane (TM) helices of human D1-like dopaminergic receptors (hD1R and hD5R) harbor the same residues implicated in ligand binding and activation of catecholamine G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Yet, hD1R and hD5R naturally display the distinct functional properties shared by wild type and constitutively active mutant GPCRs, respectively. Interestingly, we show in the present study that a class of synthetic phenylbenzazepine agonists containing a methyl on the azepine ring exhibited lower affinity for the more constitutively activated hD5R. These results cannot be explained by the “allosteric ternary complex model” postulating a higher agonist affinity for constitutively active GPCRs. We have also explored the functional role of distinct extracellular amino terminus (NT) and TM1 regions of hD1R and hD5R using a chimerical approach. Of these two regions, our studies suggest that TM1 predominantly shapes D1-like ligand affinity and selectivity. Additionally, NT and TM1 of hD1R and hD5R play no role in receptor constitutive activity but differentially modulate dopamine-mediated responsiveness. The TM1 exchange mediated drastic changes in intrinsic efficacy and activity of phenylbenzazepine drugs displaying partial agonism at hD1R and hD5R. Phenylbenzazepines were converted into strong partial agonists or full agonists in cells expressing hD1R-TM1^D5 chimera while being switched from full agonists to partial agonists and partial agonists to antagonists in cells harboring hD5R-TM1^D1 chimera. TM1 exchange had no effect on antipsychotic-mediated inverse agonism. In summary, our study shows that NT and TM1 of D1-like receptors control ligand binding and agonist-induced activation, poising these regions as important structural determinants for catecholamine GPCR function.     

Ago-Allosteric Modulation and Other Types of Allostery in Dimeric 7TM Receptors

Conventionally, an allosteric modulator is neutral in respect of efficacy and binds to a receptor site distant from the orthosteric site of the endogenous agonist. However, recently compounds being ago-allosteric modulators have been described i.e., compounds acting both as agonists on their own and as enhancers for the endogenous agonists in both increasing agonist potency and providing additive efficacy—superagonism. The additive efficacy can also be observed with agonists, which are neutral or even negative modulators of the potency of the endogenous ligand. Based on the prevailing dimeric concept for 7TM receptors, it is proposed that the ago-allosteric modulators bind in the orthosteric binding site, but–importantly–in the “other” or allosteric protomer of the dimer. Hereby, they can act both as additive co-agonists, and through intermolecular cooperative effects between the protomers, they may influence the potency of the endogenous agonist. It is of interest that at least some endogenous agonists can only occupy one protomer of a dimeric 7TM receptor complex at a time and thereby they leave the orthosteric binding site in the allosteric protomer free, potentially for binding of exogenous, allosteric modulators. If the allosteric modulator is an agonist, it is an ago-allosteric modulator; if it is neutral, it is a classical enhancer. Molecular mapping in hetero-dimeric class-C receptors, where the endogenous agonist clearly binds only in one protomer, supports the notion that allosteric modulators can act through binding in the “other” protomer. It is suggested that for the in vivo, clinical setting a positive ago-allosteric modulator should be the preferred agonist drug.     

PheVI:09 (Phe6.44) as a Sliding Microswitch in Seven-transmembrane (7TM) G Protein-coupled Receptor Activation

In seven-transmembrane (7TM), G protein-coupled receptors, highly conserved residues function as microswitches, which alternate between different conformations and interaction partners in an extended allosteric interface between the transmembrane segments performing the large scale conformational changes upon receptor activation. Computational analysis using x-ray structures of the β₂-adrenergic receptor demonstrated that PheVI:09 (6.44), which in the inactive state is locked between the backbone and two hydrophobic residues in transmembrane (TM)-III, upon activation slides ∼2 Å toward TM-V into a tight pocket generated by five hydrophobic residues protruding from TM-III and TM-V. Of these, the residue in position III:16 (3.40) (often an Ile or Val) appears to function as a barrier or gate for the transition between inactive and active conformation. Mutational analysis showed that PheVI:09 is essential for the constitutive and/or agonist-induced signaling of the ghrelin receptor, GPR119, the β₂-adrenergic receptor, and the neurokinin-1 receptor. Substitution of the residues constituting the hydrophobic pocket between TM-III and TM-V in the ghrelin receptor in four of five positions impaired receptor signaling. In GPR39, representing the 12% of 7TM receptors lacking an aromatic residue at position VI:09, unchanged agonist-induced signaling was observed upon Ala substitution of LeuVI:09 despite reduced cell surface expression of the mutant receptor. It is concluded that PheVI:09 constitutes an aromatic microswitch that stabilizes the active, outward tilted conformation of TM-VI relative to TM-III by sliding into a tight hydrophobic pocket between TM-III and TM-V and that the hydrophobic residue in position III:16 constitutes a gate for this transition.     

Ago-allosteric modulation and other types of allostery in dimeric 7TM receptors

Conventionally, an allosteric modulator is neutral in respect of efficacy and binds to a receptor site distant from the orthosteric site of the endogenous agonist. However, recently compounds being ago-allosteric modulators have been described i.e., compounds acting both as agonists on their own and as enhancers for the endogenous agonists in both increasing agonist potency and providing additive efficacy-superagonism. The additive efficacy can also be observed with agonists, which are neutral or even negative modulators of the potency of the endogenous ligand. Based on the prevailing dimeric concept for 7TM receptors, it is proposed that the ago-allosteric modulators bind in the orthosteric binding site, but-importantly-in the "other" or allosteric protomer of the dimer. Hereby, they can act both as additive co-agonists, and through intermolecular cooperative effects between the protomers, they may influence the potency of the endogenous agonist. It is of interest that at least some endogenous agonists can only occupy one protomer of a dimeric 7TM receptor complex at a time and thereby they leave the orthosteric binding site in the allosteric protomer free, potentially for binding of exogenous, allosteric modulators. If the allosteric modulator is an agonist, it is an ago-allosteric modulator; if it is neutral, it is a classical enhancer. Molecular mapping in hetero-dimeric class-C receptors, where the endogenous agonist clearly binds only in one protomer, supports the notion that allosteric modulators can act through binding in the "other" protomer. It is suggested that for the in vivo, clinical setting a positive ago-allosteric modulator should be the preferred agonist drug.     

A second disulfide bridge from the N-terminal domain to extracellular loop 2 dampens receptor activity in GPR39

A highly conserved feature across all families of 7TM receptors is a disulfide bridge between a Cys residue located at the extracellular end of transmembrane segment III (TM-III) and one in extracellular loop 2 (ECL-2). The zinc sensor GPR39 contains four Cys residues in the extracellular domains. By using mutagenesis, treatment with the reducing agent TCEP, and a labeling procedure for free sulfhydryl groups, we identify the pairing of these Cys residues in two disulfide bridges: the prototypical bridge between Cys (108) in TM-III and Cys (210) in ECL-2 and a second disulfide bridge connecting Cys (11) in the N-terminal domain with Cys (191) in ECL-2. Disruption of the conserved disulfide bond by mutagenesis greatly reduced the level of cell surface expression and eliminated agonist-induced increases in inositol phosphate production but surprisingly enhanced constitutive signaling. Disruption of the nonconserved disulfide bridge by mutagenesis led to an increase in the Zn (2+) potency. This phenotype, with an approximate 10-fold increase in agonist potency and a slight increase in E max, was mimicked by treatment of the wild-type receptor with TCEP at low concentrations, which had no effect on the receptor already lacking the second disulfide bridge and already displaying a high Zn (2+) potency. We conclude that the second disulfide bridge, which according to the beta2-adrenergic structure will form a covalent link across the entrance to the main ligand binding pocket, serves to dampen GPR39 activation. We suggest that formation of extra disulfide bridges may be an important general mechanism for regulating the activity of 7TM receptors.     

Positive versus negative modulation of different endogenous chemokines for CC-chemokine receptor 1 by small molecule agonists through allosteric versus orthosteric binding

7 transmembrane-spanning (7TM) chemokine receptors having multiple endogenous ligands offer special opportunities to understand the molecular basis for allosteric mechanisms. Thus, CC-chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) binds CC-chemokine 3 and 5 (CCL3 and CCL5) with K(d) values of 7.3 and 0.16 nm, respectively, as determined in homologous competition binding assays. However, CCL5 appears to have a >10,000-fold lower affinity in competition against (125)I-CCL3. Mutational mapping revealed that CCL3 and CCL5 both are strongly affected by systematic truncations of the N-terminal extension, whereas only CCL5 and not CCL3 activation is affected by substitutions in the main ligand binding pocket including the conserved GluVII:06 anchor point. A series of metal ion chelator complexes were found to act as full agonists on CCR1 and to be critically affected by the same substitutions in the main ligand binding pocket as CCL5 but not by mutations in the extracellular domain. In agreement with the overlapping binding sites, the small non-peptide agonists displaced radiolabeled CCL5 with high affinity. Interestingly, the same compounds acted as allosteric enhancers of the binding of CCL3, with which they did not overlap in binding site, leading to an increased B(max) and affinity of this chemokine mainly due to an increased association rate. It is concluded that a small molecule agonist through binding deep in the main ligand binding pocket can act as an allosteric enhancer for one endogenous chemokine and at the same time as a competitive blocker of the binding of another endogenous chemokine.