G protein-dependent Ca2+ signaling complexes in polarized cells

Polarized cells signal in a polarized manner. This is exemplified in the patterns of [Ca2+]i waves and [Ca2+]i oscillations evoked by stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors in these cells. Organization of Ca(2+)-signaling complexes in cellular microdomains, with the aid of scaffolding proteins, is likely to have a major role in shaping G protein-coupled [Ca2+]i signal pathways. In epithelial cells, these domains coincide with sites of [Ca2+]i-wave initiation and local [Ca2+]i oscillations. Cellular microdomains enriched with Ca(2+)-signaling proteins have been found in several cell types. Microdomains organize communication between Ca(2+)-signaling proteins in the plasma membrane and internal Ca2+ stores in the endoplasmic reticulum through the interaction between the IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum and Ca(2+)-influx channels in the plasma membrane. Ca2+ signaling appears to be controlled within the receptor complex by the regulators of G protein-signaling (RGS) proteins. Three domains in RGS4 and related RGS proteins contribute important regulatory features. The RGS domain accelerates GTP hydrolysis on the G alpha subunit to uncouple receptor stimulation from IP3 production; the C-terminus may mediate interaction with accessory proteins in the complex; and the N-terminus acts in a receptor-selective manner to confer regulatory specificity. Hence, RGS proteins have both catalytic and scaffolding function in Ca2+ signaling. Organization of Ca(2+)-signaling proteins into complexes within microdomains is likely to play a prominent role in the localized control of [Ca2+]i and in [Ca2+]i oscillations.     

Homer proteins in Ca2+ signaling by excitable and non-excitable cells

Homers are scaffolding proteins that bind Ca(2+) signaling proteins in cellular microdomains. The Homers participate in targeting and localization of Ca(2+) signaling proteins in signaling complexes. However, recent work showed that the Homers are not passive scaffolding proteins, but rather they regulate the activity of several proteins within the Ca(2+) signaling complex in an isoform-specific manner. Homer2 increases the GAP activity of RGS proteins and PLCbeta that accelerate the GTPase activity of Galpha subunits. Homer1 gates the activity of TRPC channels, controls the rates of their translocation and retrieval from the plasma membrane and mediates the conformational coupling between TRPC channels and IP(3)Rs. Homer1 stimulates the activity of the cardiac and neuronal L-type Ca(2+) channels Ca(v)1.2 and Ca(v)1.3. Homer1 also mediates the communication between the cardiac and smooth muscle ryanodine receptor RyR2 and Ca(v)1.2 to regulate E-C coupling. In many cases the Homers function as a buffer to reduce the intensity of Ca(2+) signaling and create a negative bias that can be reversed by the immediate early gene form of Homer1. Hence, the Homers should be viewed as the buffers of Ca(2+) signaling that ensure a high spatial and temporal fidelity of the Ca(2+) signaling and activation of downstream effects.     

RGS proteins provide biochemical control of agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations.

Agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations have been considered a biophysical phenomenon reflecting the regulation of the IP3 receptor by [Ca2+]i. Here we show that [Ca2+]i oscillations are a biochemical phenomenon emanating from regulation of Ca2+ signaling by the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. [Ca2+]i oscillations evoked by G protein-coupled receptors require the action of RGS proteins. Inhibition of endogenous RGS protein action disrupted agonist-evoked [Ca2+]i oscillations by a stepwise conversion to a sustained response. Based on these findings and the effect of mutant RGS proteins and anti-RGS protein antibodies on Ca2+ signaling, we propose that RGS proteins within the G protein-coupled receptor complexes provide a biochemical control of [Ca2+]i oscillations.     

Spinophilin/neurabin reciprocally regulate signaling intensity by G protein-coupled receptors

Spinophilin (SPL) and neurabin (NRB) are structurally similar scaffolding proteins with several protein binding modules, including actin and PP1 binding motifs and PDZ and coiled-coil domains. SPL also binds regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins and the third intracellular loop (3iL) of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to reduce the intensity of Ca(2+) signaling by GPCRs. The role of NRB in Ca(2+) signaling is not known. In the present work, we used biochemical and functional assays in model systems and in SPL(-/-) and NRB(-/-) mice to show that SPL and NRB reciprocally regulate Ca(2+) signaling by GPCRs. Thus, SPL and NRB bind all members of the R4 subfamily of RGS proteins tested (RGS1, RGS2, RGS4, RGS16) and GAIP. By contract, SPL, but not NRB, binds the 3iL of the GPCRs alpha(1B)-adrenergic (alpha(1B)AR), dopamine, CCKA, CCKB and the muscarinic M3 receptors. Coexpression of SPL or NRB with the alpha(1B)AR in Xenopus oocytes revealed that SPL reduces, whereas NRB increases, the intensity of Ca(2+) signaling by alpha(1B)AR. Accordingly, deletion of SPL in mice enhanced binding of RGS2 to NRB and Ca(2+) signaling by alphaAR, whereas deletion of NRB enhanced binding of RGS2 to SPL and reduced Ca(2+) signaling by alphaAR. This was due to reciprocal modulation by SPL and NRB of the potency of RGS2 to inhibit Ca(2+) signaling by alphaAR. These findings suggest a novel mechanism of regulation of GPCR-mediated Ca(2+) signaling in which SPL/NRB forms a functional pair of opposing regulators that modulates Ca(2+) signaling intensity by GPCRs by determining the extent of inhibition by the R4 family of RGS proteins.     

Differential contribution of GTPase activation and effector antagonism to the inhibitory effect of RGS proteins on Gq-mediated signaling in vivo

RGS proteins act as negative regulators of G protein signaling by serving as GTPase-activating proteins (GAP) for alpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins (Galpha), thereby accelerating G protein inactivation. RGS proteins can also block Galpha-mediated signal production by competing with downstream effectors for Galpha binding. Little is known about the relative contribution of GAP and effector antagonism to the inhibitory effect of RGS proteins on G protein-mediated signaling. By comparing the inhibitory effect of RGS2, RGS3, RGS5, and RGS16 on Galpha(q)-mediated phospholipase Cbeta (PLCbeta) activation under conditions where GTPase activation is possible versus nonexistent, we demonstrate that members of the R4 RGS subfamily differ significantly in their dependence on GTPase acceleration. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with either muscarinic M3 receptors, which couple to endogenous Gq protein and mediate a stimulatory effect of carbachol on PLCbeta, or constitutively active Galphaq*, which is inert to GTP hydrolysis and activates PLCbeta independent of receptor activation. In M3-expressing cells, all of the RGS proteins significantly blunted the efficacy and potency of carbachol. In contrast, Galphaq* -induced PLCbeta activation was inhibited by RGS2 and RGS3 but not RGS5 and RGS16. The observed differential effects were not due to changes in M3, Galphaq/Galphaq*, PLCbeta, or RGS expression, as shown by receptor binding assays and Western blots. We conclude that closely related R4 RGS family members differ in their mechanism of action. RGS5 and RGS16 appear to depend on G protein inactivation, whereas GAP-independent mechanisms (such as effector antagonism) are sufficient to mediate the inhibitory effect of RGS2 and RGS3.     

A new mode of Ca2+ signaling by G protein-coupled receptors: gating of IP3 receptor Ca2+ release channels by Gbetagamma

The most common form of Ca(2+) signaling by Gq-coupled receptors entails activation of PLCbeta2 by Galphaq to generate IP(3) and evoke Ca(2+) release from the ER. Another form of Ca(2+) signaling by G protein-coupled receptors involves activation of Gi to release Gbetagamma, which activates PLCbeta1. Whether Gbetagamma has additional roles in Ca(2+) signaling is unknown. Introduction of Gbetagamma into cells activated Ca(2+) release from the IP(3) Ca(2+) pool and Ca(2) oscillations. This can be due to activation of PLCbeta1 or direct activation of the IP(3)R by Gbetagamma. We report here that Gbetagamma potently activates the IP(3) receptor. Thus, Gbetagamma-triggered [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations are not affected by inhibition of PLCbeta. Coimmunoprecipitation and competition experiments with Gbetagamma scavengers suggest binding of Gbetagamma to IP(3) receptors. Furthermore, Gbetagamma inhibited IP(3) binding to IP(3) receptors. Notably, Gbetagamma activated single IP(3)R channels in native ER as effectively as IP(3). The physiological significance of this form of signaling is demonstrated by the reciprocal sensitivity of Ca(2+) signals evoked by Gi- and Gq-coupled receptors to Gbetagamma scavenging and PLCbeta inhibition. We propose that gating of IP(3)R by Gbetagamma is a new mode of Ca(2+) signaling with particular significance for Gi-coupled receptors.     

Mammalian fertilization: from sperm factor to phospholipase Czeta

In mammalian eggs, the fertilizing sperm evokes intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) oscillations that are essential for initiation of egg activation and embryonic development. Although the exact mechanism leading to initiation of [Ca2+]i oscillations still remains unclear, accumulating studies suggest that a presently unknown substance, termed sperm factor (SF), is delivered from the fertilizing sperm into the ooplasm and triggers [Ca2+]i oscillations. Based on findings showing that production of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) underlies the generation of [Ca2+]i oscillations, it has been suggested that SF functions either as a phospholipase C (PLC), an enzyme that catalyzes the generation of IP3, or as an activator of a PLC(s) pre-existing in the egg. This review discusses the role of SF as the molecule responsible for the production of IP3 and the initiator of [Ca2+]i oscillations in mammalian fertilization, with particular emphasis on the possible involvement of egg- and sperm-derived PLCs, including PLCzeta, a novel sperm specific PLC.     

Macromolecular Composition Dictates Receptor and G Protein Selectivity of Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) 7 and 9-2 Protein Complexes in Living Cells

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins play essential roles in the regulation of signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). With hundreds of GPCRs and dozens of G proteins, it is important to understand how RGS regulates selective GPCR-G protein signaling. In neurons of the striatum, two RGS proteins, RGS7 and RGS9-2, regulate signaling by μ-opioid receptor (MOR) and dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) and are implicated in drug addiction, movement disorders, and nociception. Both proteins form trimeric complexes with the atypical G protein β subunit Gβ5 and a membrane anchor, R7BP. In this study, we examined GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP) activity as well as Gα and GPCR selectivity of RGS7 and RGS9-2 complexes in live cells using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay that monitors dissociation of G protein subunits. We showed that RGS9-2/Gβ5 regulated both Gi and Go with a bias toward Go, but RGS7/Gβ5 could serve as a GAP only for Go. Interestingly, R7BP enhanced GAP activity of RGS7 and RGS9-2 toward Go and Gi and enabled RGS7 to regulate Gi signaling. Neither RGS7 nor RGS9-2 had any activity toward Gz, Gs, or Gq in the absence or presence of R7BP. We also observed no effect of GPCRs (MOR and D2R) on the G protein bias of R7 RGS proteins. However, the GAP activity of RGS9-2 showed a strong receptor preference for D2R over MOR. Finally, RGS7 displayed an four times greater GAP activity relative to RGS9-2. These findings illustrate the principles involved in establishing G protein and GPCR selectivity of striatal RGS proteins.     

Role of regulator of G protein signaling 2 (RGS2) in Ca(2+) oscillations and adaptation of Ca(2+) signaling to reduce excitability of RGS2-/- cells

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate the GTPase activity of Galpha subunits to determine the duration of the stimulated state and control G protein-coupled receptor-mediated cell signaling. RGS2 is an RGS protein that shows preference toward Galpha(q).To better understand the role of RGS2 in Ca(2+) signaling and Ca(2+) oscillations, we characterized Ca(2+) signaling in cells derived from RGS2(-/-) mice. Deletion of RGS2 modified the kinetic of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) production without affecting the peak level of IP(3), but rather increased the steady-state level of IP(3) at all agonist concentrations. The increased steady-state level of IP(3) led to an increased frequency of [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations. The cells were adapted to deletion of RGS2 by reducing Ca(2+) signaling excitability. Reduced excitability was achieved by adaptation of all transporters to reduce Ca(2+) influx into the cytosol. Thus, IP(3) receptor 1 was down-regulated and IP(3) receptor 3 was up-regulated in RGS2(-/-) cells to reduce the sensitivity for IP(3) to release Ca(2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol. Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) ATPase 2b was up-regulated to more rapidly remove Ca(2+) from the cytosol of RGS2(-/-) cells. Agonist-stimulated Ca(2+) influx was reduced, and Ca(2+) efflux by plasma membrane Ca(2+) was up-regulated in RGS2(-/-) cells. The result of these adaptive mechanisms was the reduced excitability of Ca(2+) signaling, as reflected by the markedly reduced response of RGS2(-/-) cells to changes in the endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) load and to an increase in extracellular Ca(2+). These findings highlight the central role of RGS proteins in [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations and reveal a prominent plasticity and adaptability of the Ca(2+) signaling apparatus.     

Signaling proteins in raft-like microdomains are essential for Ca2+ wave propagation in glial cells

The hypothesis that calcium signaling proteins segregate into lipid raft-like microdomains was tested in isolated membranes of rat oligodendrocyte progenitor (OP) cells and astrocytes using Triton X-100 solubilization and density gradient centrifugation. Western blot analysis of gradient fractions showed co-localization of caveolin-1 with proteins involved in the Ca2+ signaling cascade. These included agonist receptors, P2Y1, and M1, TRPC1, IP3R2, ryanodine receptor, as well as the G protein Galphaq and Homer. Membranes isolated from agonist-stimulated astrocytes showed an enhanced recruitment of phospholipase C (PLCbeta1), IP3R2 and protein kinase C (PKC-alpha) into lipid raft fractions. IP3R2, TRPC1 and Homer co-immunoprecipitated, suggesting protein-protein interactions. Disruption of rafts by cholesterol depletion using methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (beta-MCD) altered the distribution of caveolin-1 and GM1 to non-raft fractions with higher densities. beta-MCD-induced disruption of rafts inhibited agonist-evoked Ca2+ wave propagation in astrocytes and attenuated wave speeds. These results indicate that in glial cells, Ca2+ signaling proteins might exist in organized membrane microdomains, and these complexes may include proteins from different cellular membrane systems. Such an organization is essential for Ca2+ wave propagation.     

Ca2+/Calmodulin reverses phosphatidylinositol 3,4, 5-trisphosphate-dependent inhibition of regulators of G protein-signaling GTPase-activating protein activity

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for G(i) and/or G(q) class G protein alpha subunits. RGS GAP activity is inhibited by phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP(3)) but not by other lipid phosphoinositides or diacylglycerol. Both the negatively charged head group and long chain fatty acids (C16) are required for binding and inhibition of GAP activity. Amino acid substitutions in helix 5 within the RGS domain of RGS4 reduce binding affinity and inhibition by PIP(3) but do not affect inhibition of GAP activity by palmitoylation. Conversely, the GAP activity of a palmitoylation-resistant mutant RGS4 is inhibited by PIP(3). Calmodulin binds all RGS proteins we tested in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner but does not directly affect GAP activity. Indeed, Ca(2+)/calmodulin binds a complex of RGS4 and a transition state analog of Galpha(i1)-GDP-AlF(4)(-). Ca(2+)/calmodulin reverses PIP(3)-mediated but not palmitoylation-mediated inhibition of GAP activity. Ca(2+)/calmodulin competition with PIP(3) may provide an intracellular mechanism for feedback regulation of Ca(2+) signaling evoked by G protein-coupled agonists.     

Cell membrane permeable esters of D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate

d-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (Ins(1,4,5)P3, or IP3) is a ubiquitous second messenger that regulates cytosolic Ca2+ activities ([Ca2+]i). To study this signaling branch in intact cells, we have synthesized a caged and cell permeable derivative of IP3, ci-IP3/PM, from myo-inositol in 9 steps. Ci-IP3/PM is a homologue of cm-IP3/PM, a caged and cell permeable IP3 ester developed earlier. In ci-IP3/PM, 2- and 3-hydroxyl groups of myo-inositiol are protected by an isopropylidene group; whereas in cm-IP3/PM, a methoxymethylene is used. Ci-IP3/PM can be loaded into cells non-invasively to high concentrations without activating IP3 receptors (IP3Rs). UV uncaging of loaded ci-IP3 released i-IP3, a potent agonist of IP3Rs, and evoked Ca2+ release from internal stores. Interestingly, elevations of [Ca2+]i by i-IP3 lasted longer than [Ca2+]i transients by m-IP3, the uncaging product of cm-IP3. To understand this difference, we measured the metabolic stability of i-IP3 and m-IP3. Like natural IP3 which is known to be rapidly metabolized in cells, m-IP3 could only be detected within several seconds after uncaging cm-IP3. In contrast, i-IP3 was metabolized at a much slower rate. By exploiting different metabolic rates of m-IP3 and i-IP3, we developed two procedures for activating IP3Rs in cells without UV uncaging. The first method involves photolyzing ci-IP3/PM in vitro to generate i-IP3/PM. Successive additions of low micromolar i-IP3/PM to NIH 3T3 cells caused graded Ca2+ releases, confirming that "quantal Ca2+ release" occurs in fully intact cells with normal ATP supplies and undisrupted endoplasmic reticulum. The second technique utilizes two photon uncaging. After locally illuminating cells loaded with cm-IP3 with femtosecond-pulsed near-infrared light (730 nm), we observed a burst of Ca2+ activity in the uncaging area. This local Ca2+ rise rapidly propagated across cells and could be repeated many times in different sub-cellular locations to produce artificial Ca2+ oscillations of defined amplitudes and frequencies. The complementary advantages of these IP3 prodrugs should provide new approaches for studying IP3-Ca2+ signaling in intact cell populations with high spatiotemporal resolutions.     

From parathyroid hormone to cytosolic Ca2+ signals

PTHR1 (type 1 parathyroid hormone receptors) mediate the effects of PTH (parathyroid hormone) on bone remodelling and plasma Ca2+ homoeostasis. PTH, via PTHR1, can stimulate both AC (adenylate cyclase) and increases in [Ca2+]i (cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration), although the relationship between the two responses differs between cell types. In the present paper, we review briefly the mechanisms that influence coupling of PTHR1 to different intracellular signalling proteins, including the G-proteins that stimulate AC or PLC (phospholipase C). Stimulus intensity, the ability of different PTH analogues to stabilize different receptor conformations ('stimulus trafficking'), and association of PTHR1 with scaffold proteins, notably NHERF1 and NHERF2 (Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor 1 and 2), contribute to defining the interactions between signalling proteins and PTHR1. In addition, cAMP itself can, via Epac (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP), PKA (protein kinase A) or by binding directly to IP3Rs [Ins(1,4,5)P3 receptors] regulate [Ca2+]i. Epac leads to activation of PLC?, PKA can phosphorylate and thereby increase the sensitivity of IP3Rs and L-type Ca2+ channels, and cAMP delivered at high concentrations to IP3R2 from AC6 increases the sensitivity of IP3Rs to InsP3. The diversity of these links between PTH and [Ca2+]i highlights the versatility of PTHR1. This versatility allows PTHR1 to evoke different responses when stimulated by each of its physiological ligands, PTH and PTH-related peptide, and it provides scope for development of ligands that selectively harness the anabolic effects of PTH for more effective treatment of osteoporosis.     

5-HT1A receptor-mediated phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) is modulated by regulator of G protein signaling protein 19

The 5-HT1A receptor is a G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that activates G proteins of the Gαi/o family. 5-HT1A receptors expressed in the raphe, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex are implicated in the control of mood and are targets for anti-depressant drugs. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins are members of a large family that play important roles in signal transduction downstream of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The main role of RGS proteins is to act as GTPase accelerating proteins (GAPs) to dampen or negatively regulate GPCR-mediated signaling. We have shown that a mouse expressing Gαi2 that is insensitive to all RGS protein GAP activity has an anti-depressant-like phenotype due to increased signaling of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors, thus implicating the 5-HT1A receptor–Gαi2 complex as an important target. Here we confirm that RGS proteins act as GAPs to regulate signaling to adenylate cyclase and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway downstream of the 5-HT1A receptor, using RGS-insensitive Gαi2 protein expressed in C6 cells. We go on to use short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to show that RGS19 is responsible for the GAP activity in C6 cells and also that RGS19 acts as a GAP for 5-HT1A receptor signaling in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells and primary hippocampal neurons. In addition, in both cell types the synergy between 5-HT1A receptor and the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 in stimulating the MAPK pathway is enhanced following shRNA reduction of RGS19 expression. Thus RGS19 may be a viable new target for anti-depressant medications.     

Control of calcium signal propagation to the mitochondria by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-binding proteins

Cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]c) signals triggered by many agonists are established through the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) messenger pathway. This pathway is believed to use Ca2+-dependent local interactions among IP3 receptors (IP3R) and other Ca2+ channels leading to coordinated Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum throughout the cell and coupling Ca2+ entry and mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake to Ca2+ release. To evaluate the role of IP3 in the local control mechanisms that support the propagation of [Ca2+]c waves, store-operated Ca2+ entry, and mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, we used two IP3-binding proteins (IP3BP): 1) the PH domain of the phospholipase C-like protein, p130 (p130PH); and 2) the ligand-binding domain of the human type-I IP3R (IP3R224-605). As expected, p130PH-GFP and GFP-IP3R224-605 behave as effective mobile cytosolic IP3 buffers. In COS-7 cells, the expression of IP3BPs had no effect on store-operated Ca2+ entry. However, the IP3-linked [Ca2+]c signal appeared as a regenerative wave and IP3BPs slowed down the wave propagation. Most importantly, IP3BPs largely inhibited the mitochondrial [Ca2+] signal and decreased the relationship between the [Ca2+]c and mitochondrial [Ca2+] signals, indicating disconnection of the mitochondria from the [Ca2+]c signal. These data suggest that IP3 elevations are important to regulate the local interactions among IP3Rs during propagation of [Ca2+]c waves and that the IP3-dependent synchronization of Ca2+ release events is crucial for the coupling between Ca2+ release and mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake.     

IP(3) receptor type 3 and PLCbeta2 are co-expressed with taste receptors T1R and T2R in rat taste bud cells

The Ca(2+) signaling cascade has been reported to be activated by many tastants in vertebrate taste systems. Recently we have shown that G(i2) and phospholipase Cbeta2 (PLCbeta2) are co-expressed in a subset of taste bud cells and are possibly involved in Ca(2+) triggering of taste signaling in rats. We report here that, as a component downstream of PLCbeta2, the type 3 isoform of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) receptor (IP(3)R3) is specifically expressed in the same cells as PLCbeta2 in rat taste buds. We also show that cells expressing rT2R9, a probable cycloheximide receptor, are included among PLCbeta2- and IP(3)R3-positive cells, as in the case of rT1R2, a different type of taste receptor. Our findings indicate that PLCbeta2 and IP(3)R3 co-localize together with G(i2) as downstream components of two different types of taste receptors, T1R and T2R, in taste bud cells.     

Sphingosine kinase-mediated calcium signaling by muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Based on the finding that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can induce Ca2+ mobilization, apparently independent of the phospholipase C (PLC)/inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) pathway, we investigated whether sphingosine kinase, which generates sphingosine-1-phosphate (SPP), is involved in calcium signaling by mAChR and other GPCRs. Inhibition of sphingosine kinase by DL-threo-dihydrosphingosine and N,/N-dimethylsphingosine markedly inhibited [Ca2+]i increases elicited by M2 and M3 mAChRs in HEK-293 cells without affecting PLC activation. Activation of M2 and M3 mAChR rapidly and transiently stimulated production of SPP. Furthermore, microinjection of SPP into HEK-293 cells induced rapid and transient Ca2+ mobilization. Pretreatment of HEK-293 cells with the calcium chelator BAPTA/AM fully blocked mAChR-induced SPP production. On the other hand, incubation of HEK-293 cells with calcium ionophores activated SPP production. Similar findings were obtained for formyl peptide and P2Y2 purinergic receptors in HL-60 cells. On the basis of these studies we propose, that following initial IP3 production by receptor-mediated PLC activation, a local discrete increase in [Ca2+]i induces sphingosine kinase stimulation, which ultimately leads to full calcium mobilization. Thus, sphingosine kinase activation most likely represents an amplification system for calcium signaling by mAChRs and other GPCRs.     

Ion homeostasis and the functional roles of SERCA reactions in stimulus-secretion coupling of the pancreatic beta-cell: A mathematical simulation

The present paper concerns with ion homeostatic reactions in view of stimulus-secretion coupling of the beta-cell, including Ca2+ fluxes of the endoplasmatic reticulum (ER). A steady state of cytosolic sodium and potassium ion concentrations ([Na+]c and [K+]c, respectively), and of the membrane potential (Delta c phi) can be attained only, if the flux through the electrogenic Na-K pump (JNaK) is balanced electrically, and if JNaK is rather high (about 25% of total ATP consumption at 10 mM glucose). Metabolically caused changes of cellular pH are unlikely, because, on the one hand, CO2 can rapidly leave the cell through cellular membranes, and because ATP cycling cannot produce nor consume protons. A slight decrease of pHc during cellular activity is caused mainly by an increased Ca-H exchange flux through the plasma membrane Ca2+ pump (J PMCA), which might be overcome, however, by H+ transport into secretory granules. The present simulations show that the conductance of ATP-sensitive K+ channels (K ATP) is highly susceptible to changes of [Mg2+]c. As a physical link between the Ca2+ filling state of the ER and the initiation of a depolarising, Ca2+ release-activated current (I CRAN), a metabolite (inositol 1,4,-diphosphate (IP2)) of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) cycle is introduced. Sufficient ATP for insulin secretion is made available during glucose activation by [IP2] inhibition of a parallel [ATP]c consuming flux through protein biosynthesis (J Pbs). This leads to fast oscillations with a triphasic patterns of [Ca2+]c oscillations. Slow oscillations are initiated by including a Ca2+ leak current through highly uncoupled SERCA3 pumps. Both types of oscillations may superimpose yielding compound bursting and mixed oscillations of [Ca2+]c.     

Dynamic clustering of IP3 receptors by IP3

The versatility of Ca2+ as an intracellular messenger stems largely from the impressive, but complex, spatiotemporal organization of the Ca2+ signals. For example, the latter when initiated by IP3 (inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate) in many cells manifest hierarchical recruitment of elementary Ca2+ release events ('blips' and then 'puffs') en route to global regenerative Ca2+ waves as the cellular IP3 concentration rises. The spacing of IP3Rs (IP3 receptors) and their regulation by Ca2+ are key determinants of these spatially organized Ca2+ signals, but neither is adequately understood. IP3Rs have been proposed to be pre-assembled into clusters, but their composition, geometry and whether clustering affects IP3R behaviour are unknown. Using patch-clamp recording from the outer nuclear envelope of DT40 cells expressing rat IP3R1 or IP3R3, we have recently shown that low concentrations of IP3 cause IP3Rs to aggregate rapidly and reversibly into small clusters of approximately four IP3Rs. At resting cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations, clustered IP3Rs open independently, but with lower open probability, shorter open duration and lesser IP3-sensitivity than lone IP3Rs. This inhibitory influence of clustering on IP3R is reversed when the [Ca2+]i (cytosolic free Ca2+ concentration) increases. The gating of clustered IP3Rs exposed to increased [Ca2+]i is coupled: they are more likely to open and close together, and their simultaneous openings are prolonged. Dynamic clustering of IP3Rs by IP3 thus exposes them to local Ca2+ rises and increases their propensity for a CICR (Ca2+-induced Ca2+ rise), thereby facilitating hierarchical recruitment of the elementary events that underlie all IP3-evoked Ca2+ signals.     

Determinants of postsynaptic Ca2+ signaling in Purkinje neurons

Neuronal integration in Purkinje neurons involves many forms of Ca2+ signaling. Two afferent synaptic inputs, the parallel and the climbing fibers, provide a major drive for these signals. These two excitatory synaptic inputs are both glutamatergic. Postsynaptically they activate alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptors (AMPARs) and metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Unlike most other types of central neurons, Purkinje neurons do not express NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors (NMDARs). AMPARs in Purkinje neurons are characterized by a low permeability for Ca2+ ions. AMPAR-mediated synaptic depolarization may activate voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, mostly of the P/Q-type. The resulting intracellular Ca2+ signals are shaped by the Ca2+ buffers calbindin and parvalbumin. Ca2+ clearance from the cytosol is brought about by Ca2+-ATPases in the plasma membrane and the endoplasmic reticulum, as well as the Na+-Ca2+-exchanger. Binding of glutamate to mGluRs induces postsynaptic Ca2+-transients through two G protein-dependent pathways: involving (1) the release of Ca2+ ions from intracellular Ca2+ stores and (2) the opening of the cation channel TRPC1. Homer proteins appear to play an important role in postsynaptic Ca2+ signaling by providing a direct link between the plasma membrane-resident elements (mGluRs and TRPC1) and their intracellular partners, including the IP3Rs.