Prognostic Value of Radiological Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Osteosarcoma

Background

Chemotherapy is essential to improve the prognosis of the patients with osteosarcoma, and the response to chemotherapy is an important prognostic factor. In this study, the impact of various radiological examinations on overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) was evaluated.

Method

Eighty-two patients with high-grade osteosarcoma were included in this study, and we evaluated the following factors for prognostic significance: age (≥40 years), gender (male), tumor location (truncal site), metastatic disease, histological response to chemotherapy, radiological response to chemotherapy assessed using X-ray, angiography, CT, MRI, ²⁰¹Tl scintigraphy, and ^99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy (^99mTc-MIBI), and combined radiological score (CRS).

Results

Univariate analyses revealed that metastatic disease, histological response, ^99mTc-MIBI, and CRS were significantly correlated with OS. Multivariate analyses showed that metastatic disease (OS: HR 35.9, P<0.001; EFS: HR 17.32, P<0.001) was an independent predictor of OS and EFS. Tumor location (HR 36.1, P = 0.003), histological response (HR 31.1, P = 0.036), and ^99mTc-MIBI (HR 18.4, P = 0.038) were significant prognostic factors for OS. Moreover, CRS was a marginally significant predictor of OS and EFS.

Conclusion

The chemotherapeutic effects evaluated by ^99mTc-MIBI and CRS could be considered as prognostic factors in osteosarcoma.     

肝硬化患者胃排空的放射学研究

目的 :用放射学方法研究肝硬化患者的胃排空情况。资料与方法 :对 2 0例经临床和实验室检查证实的肝硬化患者及 18例健康志愿者摄入不透X线标示物及标准餐后 ,用数字成像X线机腹部摄片测定 6小时的胃排空情况。结果 :2 0例肝硬化患者 6小时胃排空率为 6 5 % ,而 18例健康志愿者为 10 0 % ,两者有显著性差异 (P <0 0 1) ,显示肝硬化患者有明显的胃运动障碍。结论 :用摄入不透X线标示物及标准餐的放射学方法检查肝硬化患者的胃排空时间 ,是一种简单易行、准确可靠的诊断方法     

Radiological Terrorism

We run the risk that terrorists will decide to detonate an explosive device laced with radioactive materials (a radiological dispersal device, or RDD). If such an attack occurs, it is unlikely that the affected population or emergency responders would be exposed to high levels of external radiation, although airborne radionuclides may present a health risk under some circumstances. However, the effects of radiation and radioactivity are not well known among the general population, emergency responders, or medical personnel. This could lead to unwarranted panic, refusal to respond to the incident, inappropriately delaying or denying treatment to injured victims, and other unfortunate reactions during the emergency phase of any response. During the recovery phase, current regulations may lead to costly and restrictive radiation safety requirements over very large areas, although there have been recent efforts to relax some of these regulations in the first year following a radiological attack. The wide spread of radioactive contamination can also lead to environmental contamination, particularly in low-flow areas and near storm sewer discharge points, but the total radiation dose to the environment should not be excessively high in most locations.