Comparison of rapid methods for the extraction of bacterial DNA from colonic and caecal lumen contents of the pig

AIMS: The increasing uses of DNA methodologies to study the micro flora of the pig gastrointestinal tract requires an efficient recovery of bacterial DNA from the intestinal sample. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine which DNA extraction methods are most effective for luminal samples from pigs. Several routinely used nucleic acid extraction procedures were compared based upon quantity and purity of extracted DNA. METHODS AND RESULTS: DNA was extracted from pig colonic and caecal lumen samples using 19 methods for bacterial DNA extraction. The quantity of total DNA recovered by each extraction method was determined and compared. Two methods using extraction with polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) or phenol and two methods involving bead mill homogenization were found to provide the greatest quantity of extracted DNA for both colonic and caecal lumen. Extracted DNA from these four methods was further analysed for purity based upon the presence of PCR inhibitors, which was ascertained by determining the efficiency of amplification of a segment of the 16S rDNA. PCR amplification could be readily achieved with DNA extracted by each of these four methods, but efficiency of amplification tended to be higher with DNA from two of the methods (one extracted with PVPP and one with bead mill homogenization). CONCLUSIONS: Four extraction methods proved to be significantly superior in quantity of DNA extracted from luminal samples. Of these four, no strong inhibitors of PCR amplification were detected in any of the extracted DNA. However, the efficiency of amplification tended to be lower in DNA samples from two of the methods, suggesting the presence of low levels of PCR inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Results of this study provide a basis for choosing which DNA extraction procedures are most effective for use with samples of pig lumen.     

蝗虫肠道微生物总DNA提取方法的比较

采用Bead beating法和QIAamp DNA stool mini kit法提取蝗虫肠道微生物总DNA,并对2种方法提取DNA的得率、完整性以及16SrRNA基因扩增产物的变性梯度凝胶电泳(denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis,DGGE)图谱等进行综合比较。结果表明,Bead beating法提取DNA的得率显著高于QIAamp DNA stool mini kit法(P=0.042),而QIAamp DNA stool mini kit法提取DNA片段更完整。PCR-DGGE检测微生物多样性结果显示,QIAamp DNA stool mini kit法提取DNA所代表的微生物群落多样性略高于Bead beating法,但Mann-Whitley统计学检验表明用2种方法检测蝗虫肠道微生物多样性无显著差异(P=0.17)。因此在蝗虫肠道微生物群落多样性的检测中QIAamp DNA stool mini kit法具一定的优势,而Bead beating法同样适用。     

高温环境样品总DNA直接和间接提取方法的比较

分别采用两种环境总DNA直接提取法和一种间接提取法从6种温泉菌席样品中提取总DNA,以DNA粗产物的纯度、能否用于后续PCR扩增及PCR-DGGE(变性梯度凝胶电泳)所反映的微生物多样性为评价指标对两类方法进行比较和评价。研究发现,虽然间接提取法效率低下,但对于高温极端环境中生物量较小的样品,间接法能得到有研究价值的、纯度较高的环境样品总DNA,而直接法得到的DNA量小且不适于PCR扩增操作。在使用这2类方法都能得到可用于研究操作的DNA的情况下,间接提取法能更好的体现环境样品中微生物的多样性。     

Lack of DNA alterations induced by orotic acid in rat liver as evaluated with two DNA unwinding methods

One percent orotic acid supplemented diet is a promoting treatment in the rat model of liver carcinogenesis. After treatment with this type of diet, DNA alterations were observed using alkaline sucrose gradients and alkaline elution methods. In this work we have utilized two unwinding methods for the detection of DNA fragmentation. One method is a viscosimetric method in which the rate of increase in DNA viscosity with time is related to the rate of alkaline DNA unwinding. The second method measures fluorimetrically the amount of renatured and denatured DNA after different times allowed for alkaline DNA unwinding. These two methods are very sensitive in detecting DNA breaks induced by typical alkylating agents, X-rays and H2O2. The two unwinding methods were clearly negative for the orotic acid supplemented diet. We suggest that the DNA alterations detected with alkaline sucrose gradients and alkaline elution methods, after promoting treatment with orotic acid, are probably different from the DNA breaks induced by typical alkylating agents, X-rays and H2O2.     

Extraction and purification of DNA in rhizosphere soil samples for PCR-DGGE analysis of bacterial consortia

Application of DNA fingerprinting methods enables the detection of diverse members of soil bacterial consortia, even including those bacteria not yet cultivated. However, extraction and purification of DNA from soil samples without bias is difficult. We compared five different DNA isolation methods and three purification methods for rhizosphere soil samples. Purified DNA extracts were amplified in PCR using universal bacterial primers and the PCR products were analysed with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for the visualisation of DNA bands representing dominant bacterial species. Both the isolation and purification methods affected the apparent bacterial community structure of the samples.     

The Effects from DNA Extraction Methods on the Evaluation of Microbial Diversity Associated with Human Colonic Tissue

Potentially valuable sources of DNA have been extracted from human colonic tissues and are retained in biobanks throughout the world, and might be re-examined to better understand host–microbe interactions in health and disease. However, the published protocols for DNA extraction typically used by gastroenterologists have not been systematically compared in terms of their recovery of the microbial fraction associated with colonic tissue. For this reason, we examined how three different tissue DNA extraction methods (the QIAGEN AllPrep DNA/RNA kit, salting out and high molecular weight (HMW) methods of DNA extraction) employed in past clinical trials, and the repeated bead beating and column (RBB+C) method might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from colonic tissue, using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for gut bacteria and archaea. All four methods produced very similar profiles of the microbial diversity, but there were some differences in probe signal intensities, with the HMW method producing stronger probe intensities for a subset of the Firmicutes probes including Clostridium and Streptococcus spp. Real-time PCR analysis revealed that the HMW and RBB+C extracted DNA contained significantly more DNA of Firmicutes origin and that the different DNA extraction methods also gave variable results in terms of host DNA recovery. All of the methods tested recovered DNA from the archaeal community although there were some differences in probe signal intensity. Based on these findings, we conclude that while all four methods are efficacious at releasing microbial DNA from biopsy tissue samples, the HMW and RBB+C methods of DNA extraction may release more DNA from some of the Firmicutes bacteria associated with colonic tissue. Thus, DNA archived in biobanks could be suitable for retrospective profiling analyses, provided the caveats with respect to the DNA extraction method(s) used are taken into account.     

Evaluation of Five Methods for Total DNA Extraction from Western Corn Rootworm Beetles

Background

DNA extraction is a routine step in many insect molecular studies. A variety of methods have been used to isolate DNA molecules from insects, and many commercial kits are available. Extraction methods need to be evaluated for their efficiency, cost, and side effects such as DNA degradation during extraction.

Methodology/Principal Findings

From individual western corn rootworm beetles, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, DNA extractions by the SDS method, CTAB method, DNAzol® reagent, Puregene® solutions and DNeasy® column were compared in terms of DNA quantity and quality, cost of materials, and time consumed. Although all five methods resulted in acceptable DNA concentrations and absorbance ratios, the SDS and CTAB methods resulted in higher DNA yield (ng DNA vs. mg tissue) at much lower cost and less degradation as revealed on agarose gels. The DNeasy® kit was most time-efficient but was the costliest among the methods tested. The effects of ethanol volume, temperature and incubation time on precipitation of DNA were also investigated. The DNA samples obtained by the five methods were tested in PCR for six microsatellites located in various positions of the beetle''s genome, and all samples showed successful amplifications.

Conclusion/Significance

These evaluations provide a guide for choosing methods of DNA extraction from western corn rootworm beetles based on expected DNA yield and quality, extraction time, cost, and waste control. The extraction conditions for this mid-size insect were optimized. The DNA extracted by the five methods was suitable for further molecular applications such as PCR and sequencing by synthesis.     

Comparisons of direct extraction methods of microbial DNA from different paddy soils

Molecular analyses for the study of soil microbial communities often depend on the direct extraction of DNA from soils. The present work compares the effectiveness of three different methods of extracting microbial DNA from seven different paddy soils. Comparison among different DNA extraction methods against different paddy soil samples revealed a marked variation in DNA yields from 3.18–20.17 μg DNA/g of dry soil. However, irrespective of the soil samples and extraction methods the DNA fragment size was >10 kb. Among the methods evaluated, method-C (chemical–enzymatic–mechanical) had better cell lysis efficiency and DNA yield. After purification of crude DNA by Purification Kit, A₂₆₀/A₂₃₀ and A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ ratios of the DNA obtained by method-C reached up to 2.27 and 1.89, respectively, sustaining the efficacy of this technique in removing humic acid, protein and other contaminants. Results of the comprehensive evaluation of DNA extraction methods suggest that method-C is superior to other two methods (chemical–enzymatic and chemical–mechanical), and was the best choice for extraction of total DNA from soil samples. Since soil type and microbial community characteristics influence DNA recovery, this study provides guidance for choosing appropriate extraction and purification methods according to experimental goals.     

DNA条形码分析方法研究进展

DNA条形码是一段短的、标准化的DNA序列,DNA条形码技术通过对DNA条形码序列分析实现物种的有效鉴定.随着生物DNA条形码序列的大量测定,DNA条形码分析方法得到迅速发展,推动了其在生物分子鉴定中的应用.2003年以来,DNA条形码技术已广泛应用于动物、植物和真菌等物种的鉴定,并有力地推动了生物分类学、生物多样性和生态学等学科的发展.本文在综述DNA条形码技术的基础上,总结了5类主要的DNA条形码分析方法,即基于遗传距离的分析、基于遗传相似度的分析、基于系统发育树的分析、基于序列特征的分析和基于统计分类法的分析,并进一步展望了DNA条形码技术的发展与应用.     

Southern and Northern analysis

This review on Southern and Northern analysis, rather than providing step-by-step protocols, focuses on a critical evaluation of the existing experimental methods and modifications thereof. Principal parameters influencing electrophoresis of DNA/RNA in agarose gels are outlined and at the same time alterations in these parameters for optimal resolution of DNA of varying length are discussed. Further, methods for evaluating the quality of DNA/RNA size separation in agarose gels are described. Since efficient transfer of DNA/RNA from the gel onto a membrane support is critical in both methods, several experimental approaches for transfer are compared. Also discussed in this review are alternative methods for radioactive and non-radioactive labelling of DNA probes. Finally, detailed protocols are provided for an effective hybridization of Southern and Northern blots.     

模式小鼠总DNA三种提取方法比较

目的：建立简便、快捷、经济的模式小鼠总DNA提取方法,以快速鉴定大批量模式小鼠基因型。方法采用苯酚抽提法、异丙醇沉淀法、鼠耳煮沸法提取同种模式小鼠总DNA,对比DNA纯度、得率、耗费时间,并比较基因型鉴定结果。结果苯酚抽提法得率最高,异丙醇沉淀法最低;而纯度则按照苯酚抽提法、异丙醇沉淀法、鼠耳煮沸法顺序递减;在耗时上鼠耳煮沸法最短。三种方法提取的DNA均可做模版用于基因型鉴定。结论鼠耳煮沸法操作简单、成本最低,快速、基因型鉴定结果可靠,可用于规模化的基因型鉴定实验中。     

转基因食品DNA提取研究进展

为了满足消费者对转基因食品的知情权,建立准确、快速、高效的转基因成分检测技术至关重要,而高质量DNA模板的获取,是转基因食品进行基因检测的前提.对近几年来国内外转基因食品DNA提取方法:十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide,CTAB)法、十二烷基硫酸钠(dode...     

苍耳柄锈菌三裂叶豚草专化型冬孢子基因组DNA快速提取方法的比较研究

以苍耳柄锈菌三裂叶豚草专化型Puccinia xanthii f. sp. ambrosiae-trifidae为研究试材,比较研究了其冬孢子DNA提取的9种方法,其中CTAB-钢珠法、改良的微型电钻法以及EZ-Kit改良法获得的基因组DNA经检测质量较好。在此基础上,利用ITS-PCR和ISSR引物UBC#835将待用DNA进行PCR扩增检测。结果表明,上述3种方法提取的DNA适合于ISSR反应。研究结果为专性寄生锈菌分子遗传变异的研究提供了保障。     

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for multiplex polymerase chain reaction

We compared six DNA extraction methods for obtaining DNA from whole blood and saliva for use in multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The aim was to evaluate saliva sampling as an alternative to blood sampling to obtain DNA for molecular diagnostics, genetic genealogy, and research purposes. The DNA quantity, DNA purity (A_260/280), PCR inhibition ratio, and mitochondrial DNA/genomic DNA ratio were measured to compare the extraction methods. The different extraction methods resulted in variable DNA quantity and purity, but there were no significant differences in the efficiency of multiplex PCR and oligomicroarray signals after single-base extension on the arrayed primer extension 2 (APEX-2).     

Measurement of oxidatively generated base damage in cellular DNA

This survey focuses on the critical evaluation of the main methods that are currently available for monitoring single and complex oxidatively generated damage to cellular DNA. Among chromatographic methods, HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and to a lesser extent HPLC-ECD which is restricted to a few electroactive nucleobases and nucleosides are appropriate for measuring the formation of single and clustered DNA lesions. Such methods that require optimized protocols for DNA extraction and digestion are sensitive enough for measuring base lesions formed under conditions of severe oxidative stress including exposure to ionizing radiation, UVA light and high intensity UVC laser pulses. In contrast application of GC-MS and HPLC-MS methods that are subject to major drawbacks have been shown to lead to overestimated values of DNA damage. Enzymatic methods that are based on the use of DNA repair glycosylases in order to convert oxidized bases into strand breaks are suitable, even if they are far less specific than HPLC methods, to deal with low levels of single modifications. Several other methods including immunoassays and (32)P-postlabeling methods that are still used suffer from drawbacks and therefore are not recommended. Another difficult topic is the measurement of oxidatively generated clustered DNA lesions that is currently achieved using enzymatic approaches and that would necessitate further investigations.     

DNA isolation methods for medicinal and aromatic plants

Several protocols described for plant DNA isolation fail to produce good quality DNA from medicinal herbs and aromatic plants. These plants contain exceptionally high amounts of secondary metabolites that interfere with DNA isolation. To address this problem, we developed 2 DNA isolation methods for sundew and tarragon that produce DNA suitable for molecular biological applications. One of the methods also is applicable for milfoil and Siberian ginseng.     

DNA损伤检测技术

检测DNA损伤的方法有很多,根据其原理大致可以分为3类：基于损伤DNA理化性质的改变检测DNA损伤、基于分子杂交检测DNA损伤以及基于DNA损伤后形成的产物检测DNA损伤。检测DNA损伤的方法目前还在不断快速发展、完善中。本文就DNA损伤的检测方法及其发展做一综述。     

Comparative study of three methods for non-radioactive in vivo DNA labeling in Escherichia coli using nucleoside analogs

In the present work, a comparative study of 5-FdUrd, thy-, and metabolic in vivo labeling methods for plasmid and chromosomal DNA in E. coli DH5alpha cells was performed in order to achieve the best thymidine substitution method by 5-BrdUrd. According to the colorimetric immunoenzymatic results, we found that the minimal detectable labeled DNA (MDLD) was 312pg with the 5-FdUrd and thy- methods for 5-BrdUrd labeled plasmid DNA. 5-BrdUrd replaced about 96% of the total thymidine by 5-FdUrd methods; for the thy- and metabolic labeling methods, the MDLD value was 1,25 ng for denatured 5-BrdUrd chromosomal DNA. Pyrimidine nucleoside analogues were also evaluated as immunochemical markers for their in vivo introduction into DNA.     

红树林土壤总DNA不同提取方法比较研究

获得高浓度、大片段、无偏好的土壤微生物总DNA是土壤微生物分子生态学研究和宏基因组文库构建的基础。本研究采用了5种方法从红树林土壤中提取DNA,并对5种方法提取出的DNA的质量和产量进行比较评价。结果表明,5种方法均可从土壤中提取到DNA,但不同方法提取到DNA的产量和质量存在明显差异。Bio101FastPrep?SPINKit(forSoil)抽提到的DNA得率最高,适合分子生态学研究;SDS-GITC-PEG法提取的DNA纯度最高,所得到的DNA片段较大(>48kb),有利于构建宏基因组文库。     

Comparison of three common DNA concentration measurement methods

Accurate measurement of DNA concentration is important for DNA-based biological applications. DNA concentration is usually determined by the ultraviolet (UV) absorption, fluorescence staining, and diphenylamine reaction methods. However, the best method for quality assurance of measurements is unknown. Here, we comprehensively compared these methods using different types of samples. We found that all three methods accurately determined the concentrations of high-purity DNA solutions. After digestion of DNA samples, concentration measurements revealed that the PicoGreen dye method was very sensitive to the degradation of DNA. The three methods displayed different anti-jamming ability when contaminants such as transfer RNA (tRNA), protein, and organic chemicals were included in DNA solutions. The diphenylamine reaction method gave the highest accuracy, with an average error of approximately 10% between measured and true values. The PicoGreen dye method was influenced by tRNA and protein, and the UV absorption method was susceptible to all kinds of impurities. Overall, the diphenylamine reaction method gave the most accurate results when DNA was mixed with contaminants, the PicoGreen dye method was most suitable for degraded DNA samples or DNA extracted from processed products, and the UV absorbance method was best for evaluating the impurities in DNA solutions.