The Evolution of Modularity in the Mammalian Skull II: Evolutionary Consequences

Changes in patterns and magnitudes of integration may influence the ability of a species to respond to selection. Consequently, modularity has often been linked to the concept of evolvability, but their relationship has rarely been tested empirically. One possible explanation is the lack of analytical tools to compare patterns and magnitudes of integration among diverse groups that explicitly relate these aspects to the quantitative genetics framework. We apply such framework here using the multivariate response to selection equation to simulate the evolutionary behavior of several mammalian orders in terms of their flexibility, evolvability and constraints in the skull. We interpreted these simulation results in light of the integration patterns and magnitudes of the same mammalian groups, described in a companion paper. We found that larger magnitudes of integration were associated with a blur of the modules in the skull and to larger portions of the total variation explained by size variation, which in turn can exert a strong evolutionary constraint, thus decreasing the evolutionary flexibility. Conversely, lower overall magnitudes of integration were associated with distinct modules in the skull, to smaller fraction of the total variation associated with size and, consequently, to weaker constraints and more evolutionary flexibility. Flexibility and constraints are, therefore, two sides of the same coin and we found them to be quite variable among mammals. Neither the overall magnitude of morphological integration, the modularity itself, nor its consequences in terms of constraints and flexibility, were associated with absolute size of the organisms, but were strongly associated with the proportion of the total variation in skull morphology captured by size. Therefore, the history of the mammalian skull is marked by a trade-off between modularity and evolvability. Our data provide evidence that, despite the stasis in integration patterns, the plasticity in the magnitude of integration in the skull had important consequences in terms of evolutionary flexibility of the mammalian lineages.     

Fungi Evolution Revisited: Application of the Penalized Likelihood Method to a Bayesian Fungal Phylogeny Provides a New Perspective on Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Dates of Ascomycota Groups

The depiction of evolutionary relationships within phylum Ascomycota is still controversial because of unresolved branching orders in the radiation of major taxa. Here we generated a dataset of 166 small subunit (18S) rDNA sequences, representative of all groups of Fungi and used as input in a Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. This phylogeny suggests that Discomycetes are a basal group of filamentous Ascomycetes and probably maintain ancestor characters since their representatives are intermingled among other filamentous fungi. Also, we show that the evolutionary rate heterogeneity within Ascomycota precludes the assumption of a global molecular clock. Accordingly, we used the penalized likelihood method, and for calibration we included a 400 million-year-old Pyrenomycete fossil considering two distinct scenarios found in the literature, one with an estimated date of 1576 Myr for the plant–animal–fungus split and the other with an estimated date of 965 Myr for the animal–fungus split. Our data show that the current classification of the fossil as a Pyrenomycete is not compatible with the second scenario. Estimates under the first scenario are older than dates proposed in previous studies based on small subunit rDNA sequences but support estimates based on multiprotein analysis, suggesting that the radiation of the major Ascomycota groups occurred into the Proterozoic era. Reviewing Editor: Dr. Nicolas Galtier