Anterolateral thigh flap donor-site complications and morbidity

The authors examined donor-site complications and morbidity in 37 patients after reconstruction with free or pedicled anterolateral thigh flaps. Intraoperative assessment included damage to the vastus lateralis muscle and whether the main pedicle of the rectus femoris muscle had been killed. Postoperative assessment of the donor site included wound healing, range of motion, muscle strength, gait, and sensation. Patients were surveyed with a questionnaire about fatigue in their activities of daily life and the appearance of the donor site. All 32 patients who underwent primary skin closure could perform activities of daily life normally, and most (87.5 percent) reported that donor-site appearance was satisfactory. However, the severity of donor-site dysfunction was related to the degree of damage to the vastus lateralis muscle, and most patients (87.5 percent) had some loss of sensation at the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. Because of adhesions between the meshed skin graft and the underlying fascia, range of motion at the hip and knee was limited in significantly more patients who had received split-thickness skin grafts (60 percent) than patients who had undergone primary skin closure (3.1 percent). Therefore, wider flaps or flaps harvested nearer the knee may increase donor-site morbidity. The authors concluded that the incidence of long-term morbidity with the anterolateral thigh flap is low, although it is increased when the flap includes the vastus lateralis muscle or is wider and requires additional skin grafting at the donor site.     

Anterolateral thigh flap in the treatment of postburn flexion contractures of the knee

The use of the anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap in the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects around the knee among burn patients is described. The anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap was used for eight patients (all male; mean age, 45 years; age range, 32 to 60 years). Flexion contracture was observed for seven patients with unhealed wounds and one patient with a healed burn wound. The anterolateral thigh flap was used as a free flap for six patients and as a distally based island flap for two patients. The flaps ranged from 8 to 17 cm in width and from 12 to 30 cm in length. Seven flaps were based on a musculocutaneous perforator, and two of them were thinned before transfer to the defect. A true septocutaneous perforator was observed in only one case. The mean follow-up period was 12.5 months (range, 3 to 23 months). Only one flap exhibited distal superficial necrosis, which did not compromise the final result. All patients returned to ambulatory status in 15 to 22 days. Extensor splints were applied to prevent mobilization of the skin graft at the flap donor site for only 7 days. The anterolateral thigh flap has many advantages for the reconstruction of postburn flexion contracture of the knee, as follows: (1) very large thin flaps can be elevated, (2) the two-team approach is possible, (3) color and texture matches are good, (4) the donor-site scar can be easily hidden, and (5) the technique allows early mobilization and patients can return to normal daily activity in a short time. Free or distally based anterolateral thigh flaps are a good choice, both aesthetically and functionally, for the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of the knee region.     

The use of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps in chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremity

From April of 2000 to May of 2003, 28 consecutive patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the lower extremity underwent surgical debridement and reconstruction with anterolateral thigh perforator flaps (six cases were combined with vastus lateralis muscle flaps). All wounds were open for a minimum period of 6 weeks (average, 24.7 months; range, 6 weeks to 52 months). The average patient age was 42.8 years (range, 18 to 71 years), there were 21 male and seven female patients, and the average follow-up period was 18.2 months (range, 5 to 41 months). The cause of injury was an open fracture in 10 cases, secondary wound complications after reduction in eight cases, and diabetic foot in 10 cases. The surface defects ranged from 50 to 153 cm. The wounds were debrided an average of 2.5 times and then reconstructed with flap and treated with antibiotics for 6 weeks. Antibiotic beads were used in six cases and secondary bone graft procedures were performed in seven cases 3 months after the flap coverage. All 28 flaps were successful without any signs of recurrences or persistent osteomyelitis, but partial wound dehiscence was observed during early rehabilitation in two cases suspected of delayed healing caused by diabetes. These wounds healed spontaneously. All patients achieved acceptable gait function after rehabilitation. No debulking procedure was necessary in any case. Although the muscle flap is known to provide superior vascular supply, the type of flap used for coverage seems to be less critical in the final outcome, provided that total debridement and obliteration of dead spaces are achieved. A well-vascularized anterolateral thigh perforator flap was successfully used to combat infection and bring stability to wounds with chronic osteomyelitis.     

Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity

The radial forearm flap is commonly used for reconstruction of tongue defects following tumor extirpation. This flap is easy to harvest and offers thin tissue with large-caliber vessels. However, its use leaves behind a conspicuous aesthetic deformity in the forearm and requires the sacrifice of a major artery of that limb, the radial artery. The anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap has found clinical applications in the reconstruction of soft-tissue defects requiring thin tissue. More recently, in a thinned form, the anterolateral thigh flap has been used for reconstructing defects of the tongue with functional results equivalent to that of the radial forearm flap. For the reconstruction of tongue defects, these two flaps could provide similar soft-tissue coverage, but they seem to result in different donor-site appearances. The donor site is closed primarily, leaving only a linear scar that is inconspicuous with normal clothing, and no functional deficit is left behind in the thigh. Thus, for the supply of flaps for tongue defects, a comparison between the radial forearm flap and the anterolateral thigh flap donor sites is provided in this study. Between December of 2000 and August of 2002, 41 patients who underwent reconstruction of defects of the tongue using either a radial forearm flap or an anterolateral thigh flap were evaluated. The focus was on the evaluation of the functional and aesthetic outcome of the donor site after harvesting these flaps for the purpose of reconstructing either total or partial tongue defects. Finally, a comparison was performed between the donor sites of the two flaps. The disadvantages of the radial forearm flap include the conspicuous unattractive scar in the forearm region, pain, numbness, and the sacrifice of a major artery of the limb. In some patients, the donor-site scar of the forearm acted as a social stigma, preventing these patients from leading a normal life. In contrast, the anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap, after thinning, achieved the same results in reconstructing defects of the tongue without the associated donor-site morbidity. Most importantly, the donor site in the thigh could be closed primarily in almost all patients without any functional deficit. The thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap is a viable substitute for the radial forearm flap when reconstructing defects of the tongue. The results achieved are similar to those of the radial forearm flap, and the donor-site morbidity is significantly decreased.