Abdominoplasty and abdominal wall rehabilitation: a comprehensive approach

Standard abdominoplasty techniques involve a low horizontal or W skin excision, muscle plication, and umbilical transposition. Newer techniques include suction-assisted lipectomy, the use of high lateral tension with fascial suspension, and external oblique muscle advancement. The author has modified these traditional procedures and added new techniques to improve the aesthetic and functional results of the abdominoplasty procedure. This modification provides a comprehensive approach to abdominal wall aesthetic improvement and rehabilitation. The comprehensive approach described includes four components: the "U-M dermolipectomy," "V umbilicoplasty," the rectus abdominis "myofascial release," and suction-assisted lipectomy. The patient is marked while standing for areas of suction lipectomy and undermining. The lower incision is designed as an open U with the lateral limbs placed inside the bikini line. The upper incision is a lazy M with the higher peaks located at the level of the flanks. Subcutaneous hydration is achieved to perform suction along the flanks, waistline, and iliac areas. Gentle suction of the flaps is also performed. The umbilicus is cored out in a heart shape. The flaps within the U-M marks are excised, and the undermining is performed to the xiphoid and costal margins. The rectus diastasis is marked, and the anterior rectus fascia is incised at the junction of the medial third with the central third of the width of the rectus sheath. Horizontal figure-eight plication sutures by using the lateral fascial edge enable easier infolding of the central tissue. The new recipient of the umbilicus is made by an incision in a V shape on the abdominal flap. The umbilicus is telescoped, and the triangular flap of the abdomen is sutured to the triangular defect of the umbilicus. Skin flap fixation to the umbilicus relieves tension in the lower portion of the flap. The upper skin flap, which is cut in an M manner, provides lateral tension and matches the length of the lower flap. A standard fascial suspension is used and closure is performed in layers. The techniques described here are intertwined procedures. Each facilitates the accomplishment of the other procedure, and they complement each other. They all attain the 12 objectives of the abdominoplasty described. These combined techniques have been used in 104 patients in a period of 11 years. Complications were minimal and easily manageable, except for one patient who required excision of a pseudobursa and retightening of the lower quadrants of the abdominal wall musculature to correct extreme lordosis. A comprehensive approach for the treatment of complex abdominal wall aesthetic and functional defects is presented. These require thoughtful integration of the four components mentioned. This approach has allowed predictable, reproducible, and aesthetically pleasing results.     

Effects of aesthetic abdominoplasty on abdominal wall perfusion: a quantitative evaluation

Abdominoplasty procedures involve a high risk of early complications, including hematomas, seromas, necrosis, and wound-healing problems. Their rationale is evident from the vascular anatomy of the abdominal wall, as traditional abdominoplasty includes a division of the main perforating vessels. No studies exist to quantitatively assess the consequences of abdominoplasty on the perfusion of the random pattern abdominal flap. To address this issue and quantify the influence of classic abdominoplasty on the perfusion of the abdominal skin, the authors performed a prospective clinical trial including 15 low-risk patients undergoing abdominoplasty for aesthetic purposes. Perfusion of the abdominal flap was measured intraoperatively using the technique of dynamic laser-fluorescence-videoangiography. In the region between the umbilicus and the transverse scar (zone 1), the increment of fluorescence (the slope of the intensity curve during inflow of the indocyanine green) was recorded and compared with the intensity curve of normal tissue that was not involved in surgery (thoracic wall). The results of the intraoperative indocyanine green perfusography showed a significant impairment of the vascular supply of zone 1 in all patients. The mean perfusion index in this region was 17.2 percent (range, 5 to 32 percent) of the perfusion of the surrounding skin that was not involved in surgery. The complication rate was 33 percent (five patients) and included two cases of hematoma and three cases of scar dehiscence with skin and/or fat necrosis. These data indicate that conventional abdominoplasty including extended undermining and division of the superficial and the deep arterial systems causes profound devascularization of the abdominal flap. This might explain the high incidence of complications following this procedure.     

Chest wall resection and reconstruction: a true thoracoscopic approach

We set out to perform resection of a chest wall mass with subsequent reconstruction using a pure thoracoscopic approach. Using video-assisted thoracic surgery via a three-incision approach, we successfully removed an 8.5 × 3.5-cm specimen en bloc. We then reconstructed the chest wall with 2-mm polytetrafluoroethylene. A total thoracoscopic approach to chest wall resection and reconstruction represent an additional option in this area of thoracic surgery. This approach avoids some of the drawbacks of more invasive procedures. This report outlines a totally thoracoscopic approach that we feel represents a safe and viable option for patients requiring chest wall resection and reconstruction.     

An algorithm for abdominal wall reconstruction

Acquired abdominal wall defects result from trauma, previous surgery, infection, and tumor resection. The correction of complex defects is a challenge to both plastic and reconstructive and general surgeons. The anatomy of the abdominal wall, as well as considerations in patient assessment and surgical planning, are discussed. A simple classification of abdominal wall defects based on size, depth, and location is provided. Publications regarding the various abdominal reconstruction techniques are reviewed and summarized to familiarize the reader with the treatment options for each particular defect. Finally, an algorithm is presented to guide the surgeon in selecting the optimal reconstructive technique.     

Anterolateral thigh flap for abdominal wall reconstruction

The free or pedicled anterolateral thigh flap was introduced for the reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects. This flap is superior to the tensor fasciae latae musculocutaneous flap in several respects. These include the wide, reliable skin territory (which can reach the level of the knee) and the long pedicle. Therefore, a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap with reliable blood circulation can easily be positioned above the umbilicus. In addition, the free anterolateral thigh flap has greater freedom of orientation and can be used to repair larger abdominal wall defects than can the tensor fasciae latae flap. Seven patients in whom abdominal wall defects had been reconstructed with pedicled or free anterolateral thigh flaps were reviewed. Their average age was 47.1 years (range, 21 to 74 years), and the average follow-up period was 10.7 months (range, 2 to 21 months). The size of the abdominal wall defects ranged from 12 x 12 cm to 18 x 24 cm, and the size of the transferred flap ranged from 10 x 20 cm to 20 x 20 cm. Three flaps were pedicled and four were free, of which three incorporated the tensor fasciae latae flap. All flaps survived completely, and no postoperative abdominal hernias developed. Despite some variations in vascular anatomy and technical difficulties in elevating the anterolateral thigh flap, the authors conclude that the pedicled or free anterolateral thigh flap is superior to the tensor fasciae latae flap for reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects.     

An algorithmic approach to upper arm contouring

There has been a renewed interest in upper arm contouring given the recent advances and subsequent patient interest in weight loss. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery are often left with a significant amount of redundant skin and laxity of their upper extremity. Some patients within this group have excess fat in their upper arms with relatively good skin tone, while others have a paucity of excess fat with a significant amount of redundant skin. The optimal treatment for each patient can vary. A clinical algorithm is presented that is designed to select the best method for upper arm contouring based on the aesthetic analysis of the upper arm. Case examples are provided demonstrating results that were obtained by following this algorithm.     

Evaluation of body contouring surgery today: a 30-year perspective

Concepts of beauty have been continuously evolving throughout the history of mankind. The voluptuous figures that were idealized by artists in the past have been substituted by slimmer forms. Medical advances in this century have permitted safe and efficient surgical correction of contour deformities. Until recently, these alterations were mostly hidden under heavy clothing or were accepted reluctantly. Current fashion trends generally promote body-revealing attire. The media frequently encourage the importance of fitness and good health, linking these qualities with youthfulness and beauty. The subliminal and the overt message is that these are necessary and desirable requirements for social acceptance and professional success.