Polyamines affect diversely the antibiotic potency: insight gained from kinetic studies of the blasticidin S AND spiramycin interactions with functional ribosomes

The effects of spermine on peptidyltransferase inhibition by an aminohexosylcytosine nucleoside, blasticidin S, and by a macrolide, spiramycin, were investigated in a model system derived from Escherichia coli, in which a peptide bond is formed between puromycin and AcPhe-tRNA bound at the P-site of poly(U)-programmed ribosomes. Kinetics revealed that blasticidin S, after a transient phase of interference with the A-site, is slowly accommodated near to the P-site so that peptide bond is still formed but with a lower catalytic rate constant. At high concentrations of blasticidin S (>10 x K(i)), a second drug molecule binds to a weaker binding site on ribosomes, and this may account for the onset of a subsequent mixed-noncompetitive inhibition phase. Spermine enhances the blasticidin S inhibitory effect by facilitating the drug accommodation to both sites. On the other hand, spiramycin (A) was found competing with puromycin for the A-site of AcPhe-tRNA.poly(U).70 S ribosomal complex (C) via a two-step mechanism, according to which the fast formation of the encounter complex CA is followed by a slow isomerization to a tighter complex, termed C(*)A. In contrast to that observed with blasticidin S, spermine reduced spiramycin potency by decreasing the formation and stability of complex C(*)A. Polyamine effects on drug binding were more pronounced when a mixture of spermine and spermidine was used, instead of spermine alone. Our kinetic results correlate well with cross-linking and crystallographic data and suggest that polyamines bound at the vicinity of the antibiotic binding pockets modulate diversely the interaction of these drugs with ribosomes.     

Effect of spermine on peptide-bond formation,catalyzed by ribosomal peptidyltransferase

The effect of spermine on the binding of AcPhe-tRNA to poly(U)-programmed ribosomes (step 1) and on the puromycin reaction (step 2) has been studied in a cell-free system, derived from E. coli.In the absence of ribosomal wash (FWR fraction) and at suboptimal concentration of Mg⁺⁺ (6 mM), spermine stimulated the binding of AcPhe-tRNA at least five fold, while at 10 mM Mg⁺⁺ there was a three fold stimulation. The above stimulatory effect was decreased at 6 mM Mg⁺⁺, or was abolished at 10 mM Mg⁺⁺ by the presence of FWR during the binding. Beside the stimulatory effect, spermine enhanced the stability of initiation complex AcPhe-tRNA-poly(U)-ribosome.In step 2, spermine affected the final degree of puromycin reaction and the activity status of peptidyltransferase. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects have been observed, depending on the experimental conditions followed during the binding of the donor and during the peptide bond formation.     

Effect of polyamines on the inhibition of peptidyltransferase by antibiotics: revisiting the mechanism of chloramphenicol action

Chloramphenicol is thought to interfere competitively with the binding of the aminoacyl-tRNA 3′-terminus to ribosomal A-site. However, noncompetitive or mixed-noncompetitive inhibition, often observed to be dependent on chloramphenicol concentration and ionic conditions, leaves some doubt about the precise mode of action. Here, we examine further the inhibition effect of chloramphenicol, using a model system derived from Escherichia coli in which a peptide bond is formed between puromycin and AcPhe-tRNA bound at the P-site of poly(U)-programmed ribosomes, under ionic conditions (6 mM Mg²⁺, 100 mM NH₄⁺, 100 µM spermine) more closely resembling the physiological status. Kinetics reveal that chloramphenicol (I) reacts rapidly with AcPhe-tRNA·poly(U)·70S ribosomal complex (C) to form the encounter complex CI which is then isomerized slowly to a more tight complex, C*I. A similar inhibition pattern is observed, if complex C modified by a photoreactive analogue of spermine, reacts in buffer free of spermine. Spermine, either reversibly interacting with or covalently attached to ribosomes, enhances the peptidyltransferase activity and increases the chloramphenicol potency, without affecting the isomerization step. As indicated by photoaffinity labeling, the peptidyltransferase center at which chloramphenicol binds, is one of the preferred cross-linking sites for polyamines. This fact may explain the effect of spermine on chloramphenicol binding to ribosomes.     

Yeast ribosomal protein deletion mutants possess altered peptidyltransferase activity and different sensitivity to cycloheximide.

The major function of the ribosome is its ability to catalyze formation of peptide bonds, and it is carried out by the ribosomal peptidyltransferase. Recent evidence suggests that the catalyst of peptide bond formation is the 23S rRNA of the large ribosomal subunit. We have developed an in vitro system for the determination of peptidyltransferase activity in yeast ribosomes. Using this system, a kinetic analysis of a model reaction for peptidyltransferase is described with Ac-Phe-tRNA as the peptidyl donor and puromycin as the acceptor. The Ac-Phe-tRNA-poly(U)-80S ribosome complex (complex C) was isolated and then reacted with excess puromycin to give Ac-Phe-puromycin. This reaction (puromycin reaction) followed first-order kinetics. At saturating concentrations of puromycin, the first-order rate constant (k(3)) is identical to the catalytic rate constant (k(cat)) of peptidyltransferase. This k(cat) from wild-type yeast strains was equal to 2.18 min(-1) at 30 degrees C. We now present for the first time kinetic evidence that yeast ribosomes lacking a particular protein of the 60S subunit may possess significantly altered peptide bond-forming ability. The k(cat) of peptidyltransferase from mutants lacking ribosomal protein L24 was decreased 3-fold to 0.69 min(-1), whereas the k(cat) from mutants lacking L39 was slightly increased to 3.05 min(-1) and that from mutants lacking both proteins was 1.07 min(-1). These results suggest that the presence of ribosomal proteins L24 and, to a lesser extent, L39 is required for exhibition of the normal catalytic activity of the ribosome. Finally, the L24 or L39 mutants did not affect the rate or the extent of the translocation phase of protein synthesis. However, the absence of L24 caused increased resistance to cycloheximide, a translocation inhibitor. Translocation of Ac-Phe-tRNA from the A- to P-site was inhibited by 50% at 1.4 microM cycloheximide for the L24 mutant compared to 0.7 microM for the wild type.     

Stimulation, by two Escherichia coli supernatant proteins, of the initiation of polypeptide synthesis.

Two protein factors (A and B) have been partially purified from Escherichia coli supernatant which, in combination, are more effective than 0.5 M NH4Cl in stimulating ribosomes for AcPhe-tRNA and fMet-tRNA binding, for the puromycin reaction, and for incorporating acetylphenylalanine from AcPhe-tRNA into polypeptide. The factors appear to differ from the initiation factors, the elongation factor EF-T, and ribosomal proteins. Some uncertainty exists as to whether factor B is different from EF-G. To maximize the effect of the factors in initiator tRNA binding, we preincubated the ribosomes with the factors and carried out the binding assay for a short period at 15 degrees C. Maximal stimulation of binding occurred after about a 2-min preincubation at 37 degrees C. Longer preincubation times were required at 15 degrees C, and only slight stimulation was observed after preincubation at 0 degrees C. The extent of stimulation by the factors was not affected when the NH4Cl concentration was increased from 40 to 500 mM in the preincubation. The presence of both the 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits is required for the enhancement of AcPhe-tRNA binding. Polyphenylalanine synthesis carried out without AcPhe-tRNA is inhibited by the factors. It is suggested that the factors may act by inducing a structural rearrangement of the ribosomes.     

Analysis of the puromycin reaction. The ribosomal exclusion principle for AcPhe-tRNA binding re-examined

The standard technique for determination of the ribosomal site location of bound tRNA, viz. the puromycin reaction, has been analyzed with regard to its applicability under tRNA saturation conditions. The criteria derived have been used to re-examine the exclusion principle for peptidyl-tRNA binding, which states that only one peptidyl-tRNA (AcPhe-tRNA) can be bound per ribosome although in principle two sites (A and P site) are available. The following results were obtained. The puromycin reaction is only appropriate for a site determination if the reaction conditions prevent one ribosome from performing more than one puromycin reaction. With an excess of AcPhe-tRNA over ribosomes, and in the absence of EF-G, this criterion is fulfilled at 0 degree C, where the P-site-bound material reacts with puromycin (quantitative reaction after 50 h), while the A-site-bound material does not. In contrast, at 37 degrees C the extent of the puromycin reaction can exceed the binding values by 2-4-fold ('repetitive reaction'). In the presence of EF-G a repetitive puromycin reaction is seen even at 0 degree C, i.e. EF-G can already promote a translocation reaction at 0 degree C. However, the extent of translocation becomes negligibly low for short incubation times (up to 60 min) at 0 degree C, if only catalytic amounts of EF-G are used. Using the criteria outlined above, the validity of the exclusion principle for Escherichia coli ribosomes was confirmed pursuing two different experimental strategies. Ribosomes were saturated with AcPhe-tRNA at one molecule per 70S ribosome, and a quantitative puromycin reaction demonstrated the exclusive P-site location of the AcPhe-tRNA. The same result was also found in the presence of viomycin, which blocks the translocation reaction. These findings also indicate that here nearly 100% of the ribosomes participate in AcPhe-tRNA binding to the P site. Precharging the P sites of 70S ribosomes with one Ac[14C]Phe-tRNA molecule per ribosome prevented additional Ac[3H]Phe-tRNA binding. In contrast, 70S particles carrying one molecule of [14C]tRNAPhe per ribosome were able to bind up to a further 0.64 molecule Ac[3H]Phe-tRNA per ribosome.     

Partial release of AcPhe-Phe-tRNA from ribosomes during poly(U)-dependent poly(Phe) synthesis and the effects of chloramphenicol

Poly(U)-programmed 70S ribosomes can be shown to be 80% to 100% active in binding the peptidyl-tRNA analogue AcPhe-tRNA to their A or P sites, respectively. Despite this fact, only a fraction of such ribosomes primed with AcPhe-tRNA participate in poly(U)-directed poly(Phe) synthesis (up to 65%) at 14 mM Mg2+ and 160 mM NH4+. Here it is demonstrated that the apparently 'inactive' ribosomes (greater than or equal to 35%) are able to participate in peptide-bond formation, but lose their nascent peptidyl-tRNA at the stage of Ac(Phe)n-tRNA, with n greater than or equal to 2. The relative loss of early peptidyl-tRNAs is largely independent of the degree of initial saturation with AcPhe-tRNA and is observed in a poly(A) system as well. This observation resolves a current controversy concerning the active fraction of ribosomes. The loss of Ac(Phe)n-tRNA is reduced but still significant if more physiological conditions for Ac(Phe)n synthesis are applied (3 mM Mg2+, 150 mM NH4+, 2 mM spermidine, 0.05 mM spermine). Chloramphenicol (0.1 mM) blocks the puromycin reaction with AcPhe-tRNA as expected but, surprisingly, does not affect the puromycin reaction with Ac(Phe)2-tRNA nor peptide bond formation between AcPhe-tRNA and Phe-tRNA. The drug facilitates the release of Ac(Phe)2-4-tRNA from ribosomes at 14 mM Mg2+ while it hardly affects the overall synthesis of poly(Phe) or poly(Lys).     

Folding of a three-stranded coiled coil

Coiled coils consist of two or more amphipathic a-helices wrapped around each other to form a superhelical structure stabilized at the interhelical interface by hydrophobic residues spaced in a repeating 3-4 sequence pattern. Dimeric coiled coils have been shown to often form in a single step reaction in which association and folding of peptide chains are tightly coupled. Here, we ask whether such a simple folding mechanism may also apply to the formation of a three-stranded coiled coil. The designed 29-residue peptide LZ16A was shown previously to be in a concentration-dependent equilibrium between unfolded monomer (M), folded dimer (D), and folded trimer (T). We show by time-resolved fluorescence change experiments that folding of LZ16A to D and T can be described by 2M (k1)<==>(k(-1)) D and M + D (k2)<==>(k(-2)) T. The following rate constants were determined (25 degrees C, pH 7): k1 = 7.8 x 10(4) M(-1) s(-1), k(-1) = 0.015 s(-1), k2 = 6.5 x 10(5) M(-1) s(-1), and k(-2) = 1.1 s(-1). In a separate experiment, equilibrium binding constants were determined from the change with concentration of the far-ultraviolet circular dichroism spectrum of LZ16A and were in good agreement with the kinetic rate constants according to K(D) = k1/2k(-1) and K(T) = k2/k(-2). Furthermore, pulsed hydrogen-exchange experiments indicated that only unfolded M and folded D and T were significantly populated during folding. The results are compatible with a two-step reaction in which a subpopulation of association competent (e.g., partly helical) monomers associate to dimeric and trimeric coiled coils.     

Interaction of arginine with the ribosomal peptidyl transferase centre.

Arginine inhibits the formation of acetylleucyl-puromycin from C(U)-A-C-C-A-LeuAc and puromycin ('fragment reaction'), catalized by Escherichia coli and yeast ribosomes. From 18 different L-amino acids assayed, arginine was the most effective in producing inhibition (50% inhibition at 20 mM, with 1 mM puromycin). L-Argininamide and D-arginine gave about the same inhibition as L-arginine. The inhibition by L-arginine is competitive with respect to puromycin. The plot of the slopes obtained in a Lineweaver and Burk representation versus [Arg]2, and the plot of 1/v versus [Arg]2 at a fixed concentration of puromycin, are linear, which seems to indicate that two arginine molecules must interact at the puromycin binding site to produce inhibition. In addition to the 'fragment reaction', arginine inhibits the non-enzymatic binding of AcPhe-tRNA, C(U)-A-C-C-A-Leu and C(U)-A-C-C-A-LeuAc to ribosomes. However, it does not inhibit poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis or the reaction of puromycin with AcPhe-tRNA previously bound to the peptidyl site. The results agree with arginine binding to the acceptor site, and with a sequential mechanism for the 'fragment reaction', puromycin binding first.     

Deacylated tRNA binds with 50S subunits of Escherichia coli ribosomes at a special site not corresponding to the P'-site

In the presence of methanol 50S ribosomal subunits reveal two independents sites for binding of deacylated tRNA and/or AcPhe-tRNA. The site with lower affinity was identified with the donor (P') site as the dissociation constant (Ka) for AcPhe-tRNA was equal to the Michaelis constant for its reaction with puromycin both at 0 degrees C and 25 degrees C. Log Ka increases linearly with methanol concentration. This suggests that there are no conformational transitions of the interacting components, the affinity increases only quantatively due to lowering of the dielectric constant of water, and the site can exist even in the absence of methanol, but its Ka may be too low to be measured. It follows from these data that the higher-affinity site, which is observed both in the absence and presence of methanol, cannot be the P' site as it was generally believed. By all its properties it is more like the additional E site, which has been recently found on 70S ribosomes. Specifically, its affinity for deacylated tRNA is about 1000-fold higher than for AcPhe-tRNA (in the P'-site they are almost the same).     

Puromycin interacts with the donor (P) site of Escherichia coli ribosomes

Puromycin inhibits the interaction of peptidyl-tRNA analogs AcPhe-tRNA Phe ox-red, AcPhe-tRNA Phe and FMet-tRNA f Met with the donor (P) site of Escherichia coli ribosomes. It affects both template-free and poly(U)-dependent systems. The inhibition is apparently due to direct competition for the P-site. On isolated 30S ribosomal subunits it was shown that the puromycin binding site is situated far from the peptidyl transferase center. Quantitative measurements of the inhibition revealed that the affinity constant of puromycin for the P-site is not less than its affinity for the A-moiety of the peptidyl transferase center [1.1 divided by 3.8) X 10(3) M-1).     

Tetracycline can inhibit tRNA binding to the ribosomal P site as well as to the A site

A and P sites of Escherichia coli ribosomes were titrated with AcPhe-tRNAPhe, in the absence or presence of tetracycline. The P-site location of the bound AcPhe-tRNA was assessed by means of a quantitative puromycin reaction. The results demonstrate that, in agreement with the generally held view, tetracycline exclusively inhibits the A-site binding, if the statistical number of bound acyl-tRNA molecules per ribosome does not exceed about 0.5. However, above this value the P site becomes sensitive to tetracycline as well. It follows that the tightly coupled 70S ribosomes used in functional studies appear to be functionally heterogeneous, i.e. those P sites which cannot be affected by tetracycline are preferentially occupied by AcPhe-tRNA, whereas higher concentrations of this tRNA species are required to fill tetracycline-sensitive P sites. Furthermore, the results imply that under tRNA saturation conditions the tetracycline inhibition cannot be used as an indicator for the site location of bound tRNA.     

The identification of spermine binding sites in 16S rRNA allows interpretation of the spermine effect on ribosomal 30S subunit functions

A photoreactive analogue of spermine, N¹-azidobenzamidino (ABA)-spermine, was covalently attached after irradiation to Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits or naked 16S rRNA. By means of RNase H digestion and primer extension, the cross-linking sites of ABA-spermine in naked 16S rRNA were characterised and compared with those identified in 30S subunits. The 5′ domain, the internal and terminal loops of helix H24, as well as the upper part of helix H44 in naked 16S rRNA, were found to be preferable binding sites for polyamines. Association of 16S rRNA with ribosomal proteins facilitated its interaction with photoprobe, except for 530 stem–loop nt, whose modification by ABA-spermine was abolished. Association of 30S with 50S subunits, poly(U) and AcPhe-tRNA (complex C) further altered the susceptibility of ABA-spermine cross-linking to 16S rRNA. Complex C, modified in its 30S subunit by ABA-spermine, reacted with puromycin similarly to non-photolabelled complex. On the contrary, poly(U)-programmed 70S ribosomes reconstituted from photolabelled 30S subunits and untreated 50S subunits bound AcPhe-tRNA more efficiently than untreated ribosomes, but were less able to recognise and reject near cognate aminoacyl-tRNA. The above can be interpreted in terms of conformational changes in 16S rRNA, induced by the incorporation of ABA-spermine.     

Kinetic studies on activation of peptide bond formation by hyaluronic acid.

1. In this study, a cell-free system derived from Escherichia coli has been used in order to examine in detail the effect of hyaluronic acid on peptide bond formation with the aid of puromycin reaction. 2. This reaction is activated by hyaluronic acid. 3. The degree of activation of peptide bond formation depends on the molecular size of hyaluronic acid. 4. The kinetic analysis revealed that the hyaluronic acid acts as a mixed-type nonessential activator. 5. The presence of hyaluronic acid improves about 9-fold the activity status of ternary complex as it can be calculated by k3/k5 ratio.     

Photoaffinity polyamines: interactions with AcPhe-tRNA free in solution or bound at the P-site of Escherichia coli ribosomes

Two photoreactive derivatives of spermine, azidobenzamidino (ABA)-spermine and azidonitrobenzoyl (ANB)-spermine, were used for mapping of polyamine binding sites in AcPhe-tRNA free in solution or bound at the P-site of Escherichia coli poly(U)-programmed ribosomes. Partial nuclease digestion indicated that the deep pocket formed by nucleosides of the D-stem and the variable loop, as well as the anticodon stem, are preferable polyamine binding sites for AcPhe-tRNA in the free state. ABA-spermine was a stronger cross-linker than ANB-spermine. Both photoprobes were linked to AcPhe-tRNA with higher affinity when the latter was non-enzymatically bound to poly(U)-programmed ribosomes. In particular, the cross-linking at the TψC stem and acceptor stem was substantially promoted. The photolabeled AcPhe-tRNA·poly(U)·ribosome complex exhibited moderate reactivity towards puromycin. The attachment of photoprobes to AcPhe-tRNA was mainly responsible for this defect. A more complicated situation was revealed when the AcPhe-tRNA·poly(U)·ribosome complex was formed in the presence of translation factors; the reactivity towards puromycin was stimulated by irradiating such a complex in the presence of photoprobes at 50 µM, with higher concentrations being inhibitory. The stimulatory effect was closely related with the binding of photoprobes to ribosomes. The results are discussed on the basis of possible AcPhe-tRNA conformational changes induced by the incorporation of photoprobes.     

Recombineering Reveals a Diverse Collection of Ribosomal Proteins L4 and L22 that Confer Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics

Mutations in ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 confer resistance to erythromycin and other macrolide antibiotics in a variety of bacteria. L4 and L22 have elongated loops whose tips converge in the peptide exit tunnel near the macrolide-binding site, and resistance mutations typically affect residues within these loops. Here, we used bacteriophage λ Red-mediated recombination, or “recombineering,” to uncover new L4 and L22 alleles that confer macrolide resistance in Escherichia coli. We randomized residues at the tips of the L4 and L22 loops using recombineered oligonucleotide libraries and selected the mutagenized cells for erythromycin-resistant mutants. These experiments led to the identification of 341 resistance mutations encoding 278 unique L4 and L22 proteins—the overwhelming majority of which are novel. Many resistance mutations were complex, involving multiple missense mutations, in-frame deletions, and insertions. Transfer of L4 and L22 mutations into wild-type cells by phage P1-mediated transduction demonstrated that each allele was sufficient to confer macrolide resistance. Although L4 and L22 mutants are typically resistant to most macrolides, selections carried out on different antibiotics revealed macrolide-specific resistance mutations. L22 Lys90Trp is one such allele that confers resistance to erythromycin but not to tylosin and spiramycin. Purified L22 Lys90Trp ribosomes show reduced erythromycin binding but have the same affinity for tylosin as wild-type ribosomes. Moreover, dimethyl sulfate methylation protection assays demonstrated that L22 Lys90Trp ribosomes bind tylosin more readily than erythromycin in vivo. This work underscores the exceptional functional plasticity of the L4 and L22 proteins and highlights the utility of Red-mediated recombination in targeted genetic selections.     

Hygromycin A, a novel inhibitor of ribosomal peptidyltransferase

In cell-free systems from Escherichia coli, hygromycin A inhibits polypeptide synthesis directed by either poly(U) or phage R 17 RNA, and the reaction of puromycin with either natural peptidyl-tRNA, or AcPhe-tRNA, or the 3'-terminal fragment of AcLeu-tRNA (C-A-C-C-A-LeuAc). In contrast, the antibiotic does no inhibit the enzymatic binding of Phe-tRNA to ribosomes or the translocation of AcPhe-tRNA. It is concluded that hygromycin A is a specific inhibitor of the peptide bond formation step of protein synthesis. The action of hygromycin A on peptidyl transfer is similar to that of chloramphenicol, an antibiotic that shares some common structural features with hygromycin A. Both antibiotics inhibit the binding of C-A-C-C-A-Leu to the acceptor site of peptidyl transferase and stimulate that of C-A-C-C-A-LeuAc to the donor site of the enzyme. Moreover, hygromycin A blocks the binding of chloramphenicol to ribosomes, indicating that the binding sites of the antibiotics may be closely related. Hygromycin A is a more potent agent than chloramphenicol and binds quite strongly to ribosomes.     

Reactivity of the P-site-bound donor in ribosomal peptide-bond formation

The puromycin reaction, catalyzed by the ribosomal peptidyltransferase, has been carried out so as to make the definition of two distinct parameters of this reaction possible. These are (a) the final degree of the reaction which gives the proportion of peptidyl (P)-site binding of the donor and (b) the reactivity of the donor substrate expressed as an apparent rate constant (kobs). This kobs varies with the concentration of puromycin; the maximal value (k3) of the kobs, at saturating concentrations of puromycin, gives the reactivity of the donor independently of the concentrations of both the donor and puromycin. k3 is also a measure of the activity of peptidyltransferase expressed as its catalytic rate constant (kcat). If we assume that the puromycin-reactive donor is bound at the ribosomal P site, we observe the following, depending on the conditions of the experiment: the proportion of P-site binding of the donor substrates AcPhe-tRNA or fMet-tRNA can be the same and close to 100%, while there is a tenfold increase in the reactivity of the donor (k3 = 0.8 min-1 versus 8.3 min-1). On the other hand there are conditions, under which the proportion of P-site binding increases from 30% to 100% while k3 remains low and equal to 0.8 min-1. Using the puromycin reaction it was also found that an increase of Mg2+ from 10 mM to 20 mM reduces the reactivity of the donor and, hence, the activity of peptidyltransferase, provided that this change in Mg2+ occurs during the binding of the donor but not when it occurs during peptide bond formation per se. The fact that the donor substrate may exist in various states of reactivity in this cell-free system raises the possibility that the rate of peptide bond formation may not be uniform during protein synthesis.     

Cooperative and antagonistic interactions of peptidyl-tRNA and antibiotics with bacterial ribosomes.

There is a single-site interaction of [methylene-14C]thiamphenicol and [methylene-14C]chloramphenicol with run-off ribosomes with dissociation constants Kd = 6.8 micronM and Kd = 4.6 micronM respectively. Similar affinities for the antibiotics are observed in polysomes totally deprived of nascent peptides, or bearing nascent peptides on the A-site. However, two types of interaction are observed in endogenous polysomes with some ribosomes bearing nascent peptides on the P-site and other in the A-site. The lower-affinity bindings (dissociation constants Kd = 6.4 micronM and Kd = 1.5 micronM for thiamphenicol and chloramphenicol respectively) are due to the ribosomes bearing nascent peptides on the A-site. The higher-affinity bindings (dissociation constants Kd = 2.3 micronM and Kd = 1.5 micronM for thiamphenicol and chloramphenicol, respectively) are due to the ribosomes bearing nascent peptides on the P-site. Therefore binding of nascent peptides to the A-site does not affect the affinities of thiamphenicol and chloramphenicol for the ribosome. On the other hand interaction of the nascent peptides with the P-site of the ribosomes increases the affinities of both antibiotics for the ribosome. Thiamphenicol and chloramphenicol are thus good inhibitors of peptide bond formation in ribosomes and polysomes. Their affinities are increased precisely when the peptidyl-tRNA is placed in the P-site preceeding the peptide bond formation step, which is specifically blocked by the antibiotics. There is a single-site interaction per ribosome for [35S]thiostrepton, which does not appear to be affected by the attachment to the ribosomes of mRNA, tRNA and nascent peptides either to the A or the P-site. [N-methyl-14C]Lincomycin, [N-methyl-14C]erythromycin, [G-3H]streptogramin B and [G-3H]-streptogramin A bind to run-off ribosomes and polysomes totally free from nascent peptides. However, these antibiotics do not interact with ribosomes bearing nascent peptides either in the A or the P-site and therefore are not active on preformed polysomes. Thus lincomycin and streptogramin A only interact with free ribosomes and 50-S subunits and block the early rounds of peptide bond formation prior to polysome formation. Erythromycin and streptogramin B do not inhibit either initiation or the first round of peptide bond formation. However, erythromycin and streptogramin B, prebound to the ribosome, block peptide elongation probably by steric hindrance with the growing oligopeptide chain when this reaches a certain critical length.     

Puromycin reaction of the A-site bound peptidyl-tRNA.

AcPhe2-tRNA(Phe) which appears in ribosomes after consecutive binding of AcPhe-tRNA(Phe) at the P sites and EF-Tu-directed binding of Phe-tRNA(Phe) at the A sites is able to react quantitatively with puromycin in the absence of EF-G. One could readily explain this fact to be the consequence of spontaneous translocation. However, a detailed study of kinetics of puromycin reaction carried out with the use of viomycin (inhibitor of translocation) and the P-site test revealed that, apart from spontaneous translocation, this peptidyl-tRNA could react with puromycin being located at the A site. This leads to the conclusion that the transpeptidation reaction triggers conformational changes in the A-site ribosomal complex bringing the 3'-end of a newly synthesized peptidyl-tRNA nearer to the peptidyl site of peptidyltransferase center. This is detected functionally as a highly pronounced ability of such a peptidyl-tRNA to react with puromycin.