Intracranial pressure changes in craniosynostotic rabbits

Cranial vault and brain deformities in individuals with craniosynostosis are thought to result, in part, from changes in intracranial pressure, but clinical findings are still inconclusive. The present study describes intracranial pressure changes in a rabbit model with naturally occurring, uncorrected coronal suture synostosis. Longitudinal and cross-sectional intracranial pressure data were collected from 241 New Zealand White rabbits, divided into four groups: normal controls (n = 81); rabbits with delayed-onset coronal suture synostosis (n = 78); rabbits with early-onset unilateral coronal suture synostosis (n = 32); and rabbits with early-onset bilateral coronal suture synostosis (n = 50). Epidural intracranial pressure measurements were obtained at 10, 25, 42, and 84 days of age using a NeuroMonitor microsensor transducer. Normal rabbits and rabbits with delayed-onset coronal suture and early-onset unilateral coronal suture synostosis showed a similar oscillating pattern of age-related changes in normal and head-down intracranial pressure from 10 to 84 days of age. In contrast, rabbits with early-onset bilateral coronal suture synostosis showed markedly elevated normal and head-down intracranial pressure levels from 10 to 25 days and showed a different pattern through 84 days. Results from one-way analysis of variance revealed significant (p < 0.01) group differences only at 25 days of age. Rabbits with early-onset bilateral coronal suture synostosis had significantly (p < 0.05) greater normal and head-down intracranial pressure (by 42 percent) than the other three groups. These results showed differing intracranial pressure compensations in rabbits with uncorrected multiple-suture synostosis compared with normal rabbits or rabbits with uncorrected single-suture synostosis, possibly through progressive cerebral atrophy and decreased intracranial volume, abnormal intracranial vascular patterns and blood volume, and/or differing cranial vault compensatory changes.     

Mandibular condylar growth alterations after unilateral partial facial paralysis: an experimental study in the rabbit.

In a previous study in the rabbit, the authors defined the macroscopic growth alterations after unilateral partial facial paralysis. Dry skull measurements revealed a reduced premaxillary, maxillary, mandibular, and anterior corpus length with a simultaneous increase in mandibular ramal height on the paralyzed side. The authors hypothesize that these mandibular growth alterations are, among others, caused by alterations in condylar growth activity and that an altered occlusal relationship may be involved in the adaptive condylar growth response after facial paralysis.A total of 84 New Zealand White rabbits were used for this study. The animals were randomly assigned to either a control group that was not operated on (n = 28), a group that underwent a sham-operation (n = 28), or an experimental group (n = 28). In the sham-operation group, the facial nerve was dissected as in the experimental group but was left intact. In the experimental group, a left-side partial facial paralysis involving the midfacial muscles was induced by an operation at the age of 12 days. After different follow-up time intervals of 3.5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, and 56 days, four control, four sham-operation, and four experimental animals (all randomly selected) were killed for histomorphometric measurements of the left control and sham condyles and the left-side and right-side experimental condyles.No significant differences between the control and sham-operation groups were found. The other results revealed that shortly after the paralysis in the experimental group, as compared with the controls, a decrease in condylar growth activity was seen before a catch-up increase in activity, as expressed by the time-sequenced decrease and increase in the height of the functional and hypertrophic chondroblast layer. The response on the right side was analogous, though less intense.It is suggested that the mandibular ramal growth alterations might be the result of a chain of adaptations involving the lateral pterygoid muscle and the condylar growth activity. The unilaterally restricted length increment of the maxillary snout, as a result of the loss of tensile forces caused by paralysis of the midfacial musculature, necessitated an adaptation in the position of the mandible to maintain a normal occlusal relationship. Subsequently, the function of muscles involved or influenced by an altered mandibular position, such as the lateral pterygoid muscle, were changed. These altered muscle activities induced condylar growth adaptations, which in turn explained the alterations in mandibular ramal growth.     

American society of maxillofacial surgeons outcome study: preoperative and postoperative neurodevelopmental findings in single-suture craniosynostosis

The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the neurodevelopmental effects associated with single-suture, nonsyndromic craniosynostosis before and after surgery. Children diagnosed with single-suture craniosynostosis were evaluated by a psychologist using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (BSID-II) within 2 months before and again 1 year after surgical correction. The BSID-II is a widely used measure of infant cognitive and motor development. The scale consists of three parts, the Mental Developmental Index (MDI), the Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI), and the Behavior Rating Scale. The MDI and PDI yield age-standard scores (mean, 100; SD, 16). The children ranged in age from 2.5 to 10 months at the time of the craniofacial reconstruction (average age, 5.9 months). Metopic synostosis was diagnosed in 23 percent, sagittal synostosis in 45 percent, and unilateral coronal synostosis in 32 percent of patients. Twenty-two patients were evaluated preoperatively, of whom 15 patients were evaluated postoperatively. Mean baseline BSID-II scores revealed a mild delay in mental and motor scores (MDI, 82.3; PDI, 79.5). Mean postoperative BSID-II scores still revealed a mild delay in mental scores but significantly improved motor scores (MDI, 79.3; PDI, 89.3). Of the 15 children, four (27 percent) had BSID-II evaluations that were in the average range for all scales and nine infants (60 percent) had at least one MDI or PDI score in the significantly delayed range (<70). Among children with single-suture nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, mean Bayley scores indicated mild baseline deficits in both mental and motor scores. After surgical treatment, improvement was seen in the motor scale. It appears from this sample that neurodevelopmental abnormalities may be present in children with single-suture synostosis, and some may persist at 1 year of follow-up.     

Effect of unilateral partial facial paralysis on periosteal growth at the muscle-bone interface of facial muscles and facial bones

In a previous study, the influence of the midfacial musculature upon growth and development of the maxilla and mandible was established macroscopically. Dry skull measurements revealed a reduced premaxillary, maxillary, mandibular, and anterior corpus length with a simultaneous increase in mandibular ramal height on the paralyzed side. It was demonstrated that these reduced premaxillary and maxillary lengths were among others the result of reduced nasofrontal growth, whereas the increased ramal height was accompanied by condylar growth alterations. This study investigated whether the growth alterations at the mandibular corpus region could be explained by altered periosteal growth at the muscle-bone interface of the zygomatico-auricular muscle and the mandibular corpus, caused by altered muscle activity acting upon the periosteal sleeve. Fifty-six 12-day-old New Zealand White rabbits were randomly assigned to either a control or an experimental group. In the experimental group, left-sided partial facial paralysis was induced surgically when the animals were 12 days old. To study the muscle-bone interface, seven follow-up time intervals were defined between 3.5 and 60 days following the surgery. At these time intervals, four randomly selected control animals and four randomly selected experimental animals were killed. The anterior mandibular corpus region with the muscle-bone interface of the left control hemimandible and the left and right experimental hemimandibles was processed for undecalcified tissue preparation. Quantitative analysis of the total bone area at the muscle-bone interface revealed no significant differences between the left control hemimandible and the left and right experimental hemimandibles. Also, qualitative study of the histologic sections showed no major changes in the appearance or development of the trabecular pattern between the groups. However, slight differences in the distribution pattern of osteoblasts and osteoclasts along the bony surface were found between the left control hemimandible and the left and right experimental hemimandibles, which seemed to explain the alterations in mandibular corpus shape between these groups. It was suggested that these changes in the distribution pattern of osteoblasts and osteoclasts were the result of changes in the loading distribution pattern acting upon the mandible, caused by an altered neuromuscular recruitment pattern of the remaining functionally intact, mandibularly attached muscles. The latter was probably the result of adaptive mandibular positioning in response to an altered occlusal relationship, which was induced by the abnormal maxillary growth as a result of the unilateral partial facial paralysis.     

Coronal ring involvement in patients treated for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis

The etiopathology of the clinical entity normally referred to as unilateral coronal synostosis is commonly used to connote unilateral fusion of the frontoparietal suture. However, other sutures in the coronal ring may exhibit synostosis concomitant with or independent from frontoparietal synostosis and give rise to similar clinical phenotypes. This study retrospectively analyzes high-resolution computed tomographic data sets to determine patency of sutures within the coronal ring. Computed tomographic scan digital data from 33 infants who subsequently underwent surgical correction of unilateral coronal synostosis were assessed for sutural patency using Analyze imaging software. The frontosphenoidal suture was subdivided into intraorbital frontosphenoidal and extraorbital frontosphenoidal portions, and the patency of the frontoethmoidal suture was also assessed. Patients were sorted into two groups on the basis of the status of their frontosphenoidal sutures: group 1 had patent frontosphenoidal but synostotic frontoparietal sutures (n = 21) and group 2 had both frontosphenoidal and frontoparietal synostoses. Observer reproducibility was tested. The vertical and horizontal dimensions of the bony orbit and the endocranial base deflection angle were measured with the observer blinded with regard to sutural status group. Frontoethmoidal synostosis was not noted in any patients in either group. Two patients had no frontoparietal suture synostosis with isolated intraorbital frontosphenoidal and extraorbital frontosphenoidal suture closures. Suture diagnosis reproducibility was 99 percent. In group 1, the ipsilateral-to-contralateral vertical orbit dimension ratio averaged 1.11, whereas in group 2 it averaged 1.04 (p < 0.05). The ratio of horizontal orbit measurements was not significantly different between groups. In both groups, the endocranial base was deflected ipsilateral to the synostotic frontoparietal suture, with an average angle of 12 degrees in group 1 and 17 degrees in group 2 (p < 0.005). The extent of synostosis along the coronal sutural ring contributes to the dysmorphology of the orbit and the endocranial base deflection in patients whose clinical phenotypic diagnosis is unilateral coronal synostosis.     

Maxillary volume growth in craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis, and in particular, craniofacial dysostosis, exhibits abnormalities of the nasomaxillary complex in form, position, and development. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the volumetric maxillary abnormality in patients at the time of initial diagnosis of craniosynostosis and to make comparisons with a "normal" reference range for maxillary volumes throughout childhood. The technique of segmentation was applied to preoperative computed tomographic head scans obtained in 31 children (14 boys, 17 girls), between 1 and 34 months of age (mean, 11.06 months), who underwent cranial expansion surgery for craniosynostosis affecting the coronal suture complex. Maxillary volumes were plotted against age for the first 3 years of life and were compared with a healthy population. There was no statistical difference between the two sexes for mean maxillary volume. The mean maxillary volumes for the entire group were statistically smaller than the norm (p = 0.046, linear regression with age as a covariable), but there was no statistical difference among the four different groups of coronal synostosis (unilateral coronal, nonsyndromic bilateral coronal, nonsyndromic complex pansynostosis, syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis) (p = 0.407, one-way analysis of variance). On graphic data analysis, the maxillary volume was smaller than the norm in craniosynostotic children who presented in the first few months of life. However, by 7 months of age in nonsyndromic bilateral coronal synostosis and by 17 months of age in syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis, the maxillary volumes had increased toward the norm. This implies that the effect of the craniosynostotic process on the midface structures is present from birth and parallels the effect on the cranial vault sutures.     

Unilateral and bilateral expression of a quantitative trait: asymmetry and symmetry in coronal craniosynostosis

Bilateral symmetry in vertebrates is imperfect and mild asymmetries are found in normal growth and development. However, abnormal development is often characterized by strong asymmetries. Coronal craniosynostosis, defined here as consisting of premature suture closure and a characteristic skull shape, is a complex trait. The premature fusion of the coronal suture can occur unilaterally associated with skull asymmetry (anterior plagiocephaly) or bilaterally associated with a symmetric but brachycephalic skull. We investigated the relationship between coronal craniosynostosis and skull bilateral symmetry. Three-dimensional landmark coordinates were recorded on preoperative computed tomography images of children diagnosed with coronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (N = 40) and that of unaffected individuals (N = 20) and analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Our results showed that the fusion pattern of the coronal suture is similar across individuals and types of coronal craniosynostosis. Shape analysis showed that skulls of bilateral coronal craniosynostosis (BCS) and unaffected individuals display low degrees of asymmetry, whereas right and left unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) skulls are asymmetric and mirror images of one another. When premature fusion of the coronal suture (without taking into account cranial dysmorphology) is scored as a qualitative trait, the expected relationship between trait frequency and trait unilateral expression (i.e. negative correlation) is confirmed. Overall, we interpret our results as evidence that the same biological processes operate on the two sides in BCS skulls and on the affected side in UCS skulls, and that coronal craniosynostosis is a quantitative trait exhibiting a phenotypic continuum with BCS displaying more intense shape changes than UCS.     

Plasticity of the endocranial base in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis

Limited in vivo data exist on the dysmorphology of the cranial base in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Few studies have documented the effect of calvarial surgery for synostosis on endocranial morphology. Previous work has suggested that the dysmorphology of the endocranial base is diagnostically specific for metopic, sagittal, and unicoronal sutures. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the endocranial base in infants with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis by testing the hypothesis that the dysmorphology is, to some degree, a secondary deformation rather than a primary malformation. Three questions were addressed: (1) Can individuals reliably identify affected suture-specific endocranial-base morphology using standard templates? (2) Does calvarial surgery in infancy for craniosynostosis affect the perception of endocranial-base morphology? and (3) Does calvarial surgery in infancy for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis normalize the endocranial base?In this study, three-dimensional volumetric reconstructions from archived computed tomography digital data were processed using the ANALYZE imaging software. Dysmorphology was assessed by nine independent, blinded skilled observers who reviewed two separate sets of images of endocranial bases. Both sets contained images from the same patients: one set contained preoperative images, and the other contained images of the endocranial base 1 year after calvarial surgery. Observers were asked to sort each set into four suture-specific diagnostic groups: normal, unicoronal, metopic, and sagittal. Each set contained 10 patients with unicoronal synostosis, 10 with metopic synostosis, 10 with sagittal synostosis, and four normal patients. Seventy-eight percent of the total number of preoperative images were correctly sorted into the suture-specific diagnostic group, whereas only 55 percent of the total number of postoperative images were correctly matched. With regard to the individual sutures, the results were as follows (data are presented as preoperative accuracy versus postoperative accuracy): metopic, 76 percent versus 44 percent; sagittal, 58 percent versus 34 percent; unicoronal, 100 percent versus 79 percent; and normal, 83 percent versus 72 percent. Although 36 of 306 total images per group (12 percent) actually represented normal patients, the observers called 72 of 306 normal (24 percent) in the preoperative set versus 110 of 306 normal (36 percent) in the postoperative set. In conclusion, (1) the endocranial dysmorphology of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is recognizably specific to the affected suture; (2) calvarial surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis normalizes the endocranial base qualitatively with regard to the diminished ability of raters to identify the primary pathology; and (3) the documented postoperative changes in endocranial base morphology after calvarial surgery for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis in infancy indicates that a major component of that dysmorphology is a secondary deformity rather than a primary malformation.     

Positional changes of the frontoparietal ossification centers in perinatal craniosynostotic rabbits.

It has been suggested that craniosynostosis is caused by abnormally located ossification centers (i.e., bony tubers) in the developing skull prior to suture formation [Mathijssen et al., 1996, 1997]. The present study was designed to test this hypothesis in a rabbit model of human familial, nonsyndromic coronal suture (CS) synostosis. Calvariae were taken from 99 New Zealand White rabbit perinates (55 normal controls, 15 with delayed-onset CS synostosis, and 29 with bilateral or unilateral CS synostosis), ranging in age from 23 to 34 days postconception (synostosis occurs at approximately 23 days in this model). Frontoparietal, interfrontal, and interparietal ossification center distances were obtained using a Wild microscope with camera lucida attachment and a 2-D computer digitization technique. Linear regression analysis was used to compare age-related changes in the perinatal ossification centers among groups. Results revealed that frontoparietal ossification center regression line slopes had similar start points (24-day intercepts) with significantly (P < 0.05) diverging slopes over time. Normal and delayed-onset ossification center distance increased more rapidly than in synostosed perinates. No significant (P > 0.05) differences were noted in regression line slopes among groups for interparietal or interfrontal ossification center distances. Results demonstrated that, in synostosed perinates, frontoparietal ossification center location was similar to normals around the time of synostosis and became displaced later. These findings suggest that ossification center (i.e., bony tuber) displacement seen in infants with craniosynostosis is probably a secondary and compensatory, postsynostotic change and not a primary causal factor of synostosis in this rabbit model.     

Microscopic study of the rabbit mandibular periosteum and attached structures.

The structure of the mandibular periosteum in rabbits of different ages has been studied by different histological staining techniques and polarization microscopy. The periosteum consisted of two layers. From the inner, cellular layer the functional state could be determined. A reproducible pattern of resorptive and depository areas was found on the bony surface. In the outer, fibrous periosteal layer, collagenous and elastin fibers were running in distinct directions. The masticatory muscles appeared to be attached directly endomysially or indirectly endomysially, via the perimysium or tendinous attachment. From the periosteal structures and the characteristics of muscular fiber attachments to the bone and periosteum, especially in the ramal and condylar areas, it could be concluded that a mechanical influence of the periosteum on condylar growth is very well possible, which will probably vary during life. The masticatory muscles seemed to be only of minor influence in condylar activity.     

The incidence and expression of the subcondylar tubercle of the mandible in early Polynesians, modern Indians and modern Europeans

A sample of pre-European Polynesian and Melanesian mandibles, modern Asian Indians and cadaveric European mandibles were investigated to establish the prevalence of a subcondylar tubercle and to attempt to relate its presence to mandibular function. Among the three population samples, the subcondylar tubercle appeared 1.5 times more frequently among the Polynesians/Melanesians, than either the Indian or European groups. It was fairly equally present on both sides in all three groups. Where it was present unilaterally, it was far more likely to be present on the left side. This left-side presence coincided with a significantly greater right-side condylar height and ramal width.     

Experimental unilateral coronal synostosis in rabbits

Immobilization of the coronal suture was produced unilaterally in 9-day-old rabbits to determine its effect on subsequent craniofacial development. The suture was immobilized unilaterally by the topical application of methylcyanoacrylate adhesive. Subsequent growth effects on the cranial vault, base, and facial skeleton were assessed by serial radiographic cephalometry. Unilateral coronal suture immobilization resulted in significantly decreased bone growth at the coronal suture (mean 0.95 mm +/- 0.35 SE) when compared to sham-treated control animals (mean 5.06 mm +/- 0.20 SE). Frontonasal suture bone growth contralateral to the immobilized half of the coronal suture, however, was significantly increased. The anterior cranial base became significantly shortened, and orbital asymmetry developed. The pattern of induced abnormalities simulates unilateral coronal synostosis in humans.     

Unilateral fusion of the frontosphenoidal suture: a rare cause of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly

Unilateral coronal synostosis is the common appellation for premature, one-sided fusion of the frontoparietal suture-the most common cause of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. However, frontal asymmetry can also result from isolated fusion across the anterior cranial base without involvement of the frontoparietal suture. This article describes three patients with localized synostosis of the frontosphenoidal suture, the medial extension of the coronal ring. Two patients were initially misdiagnosed as having unilateral coronal synostosis and the other as having deformational frontal plagiocephaly. The patients had variable frontal flattening, with depression and recession of the ipsilateral orbital rim. The nasal root was midline or slightly deviated to the contralateral side. The sagittal position of the ipsilateral malar eminence was slightly retruded in one patient and symmetric in the other two. The auricular position was symmetric in the sagittal plane for all patients. In all three patients, computed tomography examination demonstrated a patent frontoparietal suture and fusion of the frontosphenoidal suture (basilar hemicoronal ring). Two patients had involvement of contiguous sutures: one had fusion extending to the sphenoethmoidal suture and the other's involved part of the sphenozygomatic suture. The sagittal suture was midline in all patients. In summary, synostotic frontal plagiocephaly denotes a relatively broad phenotypic spectrum that includes unilateral coronal synostosis and more isolated fusions in the basilar coronal ring. The physical findings resulting from frontosphenoidal synostosis are unique, yet careful evaluation will minimize confusion with other causes of asymmetric frontal flattening. Proper diagnosis necessitates awareness of this uncommon entity and requires focused computed tomographic assessment.     

Endoscopic craniectomy for early correction of craniosynostosis

Twelve patients between 0.4 and 7.8 months of age were treated by an endoscopic approach to strip craniectomy. Nine patients had sagittal suture involvement. Two patients had a single unilateral lambdoid suture synostosis, and one patient had a combination of a right coronal synostosis and a metopic synostosis. Postoperatively, all patients were placed in cranial remodeling helmets and the results showed that the estimated blood loss ranged from 5 cc to 150 cc, with blood transfusion required in only one patient. All patients were discharged from the hospital by day 2, and all patients had an improvement in their cranial head shape. The specific technique of using the endoscope to aid in performing a strip craniectomy will be discussed. Nine endoscopically treated patients with the diagnosis of sagittal suture synostosis were compared with nine patients treated by using the Marchac remodeling techniques. The mean operative time (1.6 hours versus 3.5 hours), estimated blood loss (43 cc versus 168 cc), hospital costs ($11,671 versus $36,685), and length of stay (1.16 days versus 5.1 days) were less by using the endoscopic technique. All nine patients treated by using the Marchac technique required a blood transfusion, whereas only one patient was transfused in the endoscopically treated group.     

Skull expansion in experimental craniosynostosis

Bilateral coronal suture immobilization was performed in 9-day-old rabbits to simulate the brachycephaly deformity characteristic of coronal synostosis. Growth abnormalities were documented by serial radiographic cephalometry. A "corrective" linear craniectomy procedure was performed on the rabbits with an immobilized coronal suture at 60 days of age. The degree of amelioration of the induced abnormalities by the surgery in these animals was compared with a similar group of animals that had the same surgery plus supplemental implantation of a spring expansion device at the coronal suture craniectomy site. The mean marker separation at the coronal suture was significantly greater (5.61 mm +/- 0.52 SE versus 2.53 mm +/- 0.38 SE; p less than 0.05) following spring expander implantation than with linear craniectomy alone. Similarly, induced anterior cranial base shortening and distortion of craniofacial cephalometrics were more significantly improved by the additional use of the spring expansion device.     

Molecular analysis of patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis)

Mutations in genes known to be responsible for most of the recognizable syndromes associated with bilateral coronal synostosis can be detected by molecular testing. The genetic alterations that could cause unilateral coronal synostosis are more elusive. It is recognized that FGFR and TWIST mutations can give rise to either bilateral or unilateral coronal synostosis, even in the same family. The authors undertook a prospective study of patients presenting with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis) to Children's Hospital Boston during the period from 1997 to 2000. Mutational analysis was performed on all patients and on selected parents whenever familial transmission was suspected. Intraoperative anthropometry was used in an effort to differentiate those patients in whom a mutation was detected from those in whom it was not. The anthropometric measures included bilateral sagittal orbital-globe distance, inter medial canthal distance, and nasal angulation. Macrocephaly and palpebral angulation were also considered possible determinants. There was a 2:1 female preponderance in 47 patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. Mutations were found in eight of 47 patients: two patients with different single-amino-acid changes in FGFR2, three patients with FGFR3 Pro250Arg, and three patients with TWIST mutations. Another patient had craniofrontonasal syndrome for which a causative locus has been mapped to chromosome X, although molecular testing is not yet available. Two features were strongly associated with a detectable mutation in patients with synostotic frontal plagiocephaly: asymmetrical brachycephaly (retrusion of both supraorbital rims) and orbital hypertelorism. Other abnormalities in the craniofacial region and extremities were clues to a particular mutation in FGFR2, FGFR3, TWIST, or the X-linked mutation. Neither macrocephaly nor degree of nasal angulation nor relative vertical position of the lateral canthi correlated with mutational detection. An additional four patients in this study had either unilateral or bilateral coronal synostosis in an immediate relative and had anthropometric findings that predicted a mutation, and yet no genetic alteration was found. This suggests either that the authors' screening methods were not sufficiently sensitive or that perhaps there are other unknown pathogenic loci. Nevertheless, molecular testing is recommended for infants who have unilateral coronal synostosis, particularly if there are the anthropometric findings highlighted in this study or an otherwise suspicious feature in the child or a parent. Infants with either an identified or a suspected mutation usually need bilateral asymmetric advancement of the bandeau and may be more likely to require frontal revision in childhood.     

Neurodevelopment in children with single-suture craniosynostosis and plagiocephaly without synostosis.

The objective of this study was to determine whether children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and plagiocephaly without synostosis demonstrated cognitive and psychomotor delays when compared with a standardized population sample. This was the initial assessment of a larger prospective study, which involved 21 subjects with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (mean age, 10.9 months) and 42 subjects with plagiocephaly without synostosis (mean age, 8.4 months). Each child was assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID-II) for cognitive and psychomotor development before therapeutic intervention (surgery for craniosynostosis and molding-helmet therapy for plagiocephaly without synostosis). The distribution of the scores was divided into four groups: accelerated, normal, mild delay, and significant delay. The distributions of the mental developmental index (MDI) and the psychomotor developmental index (PDI) were then compared with a standardized Bayley's age-matched population, using Fisher's exact chi-square test. Within the craniosynostosis group, the PDI scores were significantly different from the standardized distribution (p < 0.001). With regard to the PDI scores, 0 percent of the subjects in the craniosynostosis group were accelerated, 43 percent were normal, 48 percent had mild delay, and 9 percent had significant delay. In contrast, the MDI scores were not statistically different (p = 0.08). Within the group with plagiocephaly without synostosis, both the PDI and MDI scores were significantly different from the normal curve distribution (p < 0.001). With regard to the PDI scores, 0 percent of the subjects in the group with plagiocephaly without synostosis were accelerated, 67 percent were normal, 20 percent had mild delay, and 13 percent had significant delay. With regard to the MDI scores, 0 percent of the subjects in this group were accelerated, 83 percent were normal, 8 percent had mild delay and 9 percent had significant delay. This study indicates that before any intervention, subjects with single-suture syndromic craniosynostosis and plagiocephaly without synostosis demonstrate delays in cognitive and psychomotor development. Continued postintervention assessments are needed to determine whether these developmental delays can be ameliorated with treatment.     

Anthropometric study of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly: before and after fronto-orbital advancement with correction of nasal angulation

Surgical correction of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly (unilateral coronal synostosis) focuses on the asymmetry of the forehead and orbits. However, there is controversy regarding whether nasal angulation should be addressed during primary fronto-orbital advancement in infancy. This prospective study was undertaken to answer that question. Preoperative and postoperative anthropometric measurements were obtained for 19 infants with nonsyndromic synostotic frontal plagiocephaly. The measurements included nasal angulation, nasion-to-endocanthion distance, nasion-to-exocanthion distance, and exocanthion-to-tragion distance. All patients underwent bilateral parallelogrammatic fronto-orbital correction. Closing wedge nasal ostectomy was performed for group I (n = 14) and was not performed for group II (n = 5). The average age at the time of follow-up assessments was 3 years 8 months (range, 1 to 14 years) in group I and 5 years 5 months (range, 2 to 15 years) in group II. A statistically significant change was observed for patients who underwent primary correction of nasal angulation; the change correlated with improved naso-orbital symmetry, as judged with nasion-to-endocanthion and nasion-to-exocanthion measurements (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Group I patients exhibited an average preoperative nasal angulation of 9.15 +/- 0.8 degrees that decreased to 3.1 +/- 0.6 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.01). Group II patients exhibited an average preoperative nasal angulation of 6.4 +/- 0.7 degrees that was unchanged postoperatively at 7.2 +/- 1 degrees. The improvement in nasal angulation in group I was particularly striking because the patients in group II exhibited, on average, a lesser degree of preoperative nasal deviation (p < 0.01). This prospective comparison of fronto-orbital correction of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly with and without nasal correction confirmed an earlier study and demonstrated that angulation of the nasal pyramid does not self-correct within 5 years after traditional bilateral fronto-orbital repair. Closing wedge nasal ostectomy results in improved nasal angulation and naso-orbital symmetry, without evidence of distortion or inhibition of nasal growth.