Connectin: a homophilic cell adhesion molecule expressed on a subset of muscles and the motoneurons that innervate them in Drosophila.

Each abdominal hemisegment in the Drosophila embryo contains a stereotyped array of 30 muscles, each specifically innervated by one or a few motoneurons. We screened 11,000 enhancer trap lines, isolated several expressing beta-galactosidase in small subsets of muscle fibers prior to innervation, and identified two of these as inserts in connectin and Toll, members of the leucine-rich repeat gene family. Connectin contains a signal sequence, ten leucine-rich repeats, and a putative phosphatidylinositol membrane linkage; in S2 cells, connectin can mediate homophilic cell adhesion. Connectin is expressed on the surface of eight muscles, the motoneurons that innervate them, and several glial cells along the pathways leading to them. During synapse formation, the protein localizes to synaptic sites; afterward, it largely disappears. Thus, connectin is a novel cell adhesion molecule whose expression suggests a role in target recognition.     

LIM同源框基因家族与神经系统

同源框基因是指一类含有同源序列的基因,它编码的蛋白质作为转录调节因子调节细胞的发育和分化,控制基因的表达形式。ＬＩＭ同源框基因不仅含有同源框基因也含有编码ＬＩＭ结构域的保守序列。     

Solution structure of the chicken cysteine-rich protein, CRP1, a double-LIM protein implicated in muscle differentiation

The mechanism by which the contractile machinery of muscle is assembled and maintained is not well-understood. Members of the cysteine-rich protein (CRP) family have been implicated in these processes. Three vertebrate CRPs (CRP1-3) that exhibit developmentally regulated muscle-specific expression have been identified. All three proteins are associated with the actin cytoskeleton, and one has been shown to be required for striated muscle structure and function. The vertebrate CRPs identified to date display a similar molecular architecture; each protein is comprised of two tandemly arrayed LIM domains, protein-binding motifs found in a number of proteins with roles in cell differentiation. Each LIM domain coordinates two Zn(II) ions that are bound independently in CCHC (C=Cys, H=His) and CCCC modules. Here we describe the solution structure of chicken CRP1 determined by homonuclear and 1H-15N heteronuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Comparison of the structures of the two LIM domains of CRP1 reveals a high degree of similarity in their tertiary folds. In addition, the two component LIM domains represent two completely independent folding units and exhibit no apparent interactions with each other. The structural independence and spatial separation of the two LIM domains of CRP1 are compatible with an adapter or linker role for the protein.     

Myoblast fusion in Drosophila

The body wall musculature of a Drosophila larva is composed of an intricate pattern of 30 segmentally repeated muscle fibers in each abdominal hemisegment. Each muscle fiber has unique spatial and behavioral characteristics that include its location, orientation, epidermal attachment, size and pattern of innervation. Many, if not all, of these properties are dictated by founder cells, which determine the muscle pattern and seed the fusion process. Myofibers are then derived from fusion between a specific founder cell and several fusion competent myoblasts (FCMs) fusing with as few as 3-5 FCMs in the small muscles on the most ventral side of the embryo and as many as 30 FCMs in the larger muscles on the dorsal side of the embryo. The focus of the present review is the formation of the larval muscles in the developing embryo, summarizing the major issues and players in this process. We have attempted to emphasize experimentally-validated details of the mechanism of myoblast fusion and distinguish these from the theoretically possible details that have not yet been confirmed experimentally. We also direct the interested reader to other recent reviews that discuss myoblast fusion in Drosophila, each with their own perspective on the process [1], [2], [3] and [4]. With apologies, we use gene nomenclature as specified by Flybase (http://flybase.org) but provide Table 1 with alternative names and references.     

hhLIM与actin相互作用依赖其C端LIM结构域

hhLIM是LIM蛋白家族成员之一,该蛋白质含有两个LIM结构域,在基因表达调节、细胞骨架组构及细胞肥大过程中发挥重要作用.构建hhLIM不同LIM结构域的突变体,探讨其两个LIM结构域在与actin相互结合中的作用及其可能机制.GST-pull down和hhLIM及其突变体与actin细胞定位关系的免疫荧光分析结果表明,C端的LIM结构域2是hhLIM与actin结合所必需的,该结构域中的两个Cys置换为Ser后可使hhLIM结合actin的功能完全丧失,N端的LIM结构域1突变使hhLIM结合actin的能力下降.F-actin交联实验结果显示,hhLIM通过LIM结构域2与actin直接结合并起到交联F-actin的作用.结果表明,LIM结构域2在hhLIM与actin相互作用及调节actin细胞骨架组构中起决定性作用.     

The LIM proteins FHL1 and FHL3 are expressed differently in skeletal muscle

We have determined the complete mRNA sequence of FHL3 (formerly SLIM2). We have confirmed that it is a member of the family of LIM proteins that share a similar secondary protein structure, renamed as Four-and-a-Half-LIM domain (or FHL) proteins in accordance with this structure. The "half-LIM" domain is a single zinc finger domain that may represent a subfamily of LIM domains and defines this particular family of LIM proteins. The distribution of FHL mRNA expression within a variety of murine tissues is complex. Both FHL1 and FHL3 were expressed in a number of skeletal muscles while FHL2 was expressed at high levels in cardiac muscle. Localisation of FHL3 to human chromosome 1 placed this gene in the proximity of, but not overlapping with, alleles associated with muscle diseases. FHL1 and FHL3 mRNAs were reciprocally expressed in the murine C2C12 skeletal muscle cell line and this suggested that the pattern of expression was linked to key events in myogenesis.     

Molecular dissection of PINCH-1 reveals a mechanism of coupling and uncoupling of cell shape modulation and survival

How cells couple and uncouple regulation of cellular processes such as shape change and survival is an important question in molecular cell biology. PINCH-1, a widely expressed protein consisting of five LIM domains and a C-terminal tail, is an essential focal adhesion protein with multiple functions including regulation of the integrin-linked kinase (ILK) level, cell shape, and survival signaling. We show here that the LIM1-mediated interaction with ILK regulates all these three processes. By contrast, the LIM4-mediated interaction with Nck-2, which regulates cell morphology and migration, is not required for the control of the ILK level and survival. Remarkably, a short 15-residue tail C-terminal to LIM5 is required for both cell shape modulation and survival, albeit it is not required for the control of the ILK level. The C-terminal tail not only regulates PINCH-1 localization to focal adhesions but also functions after it localizes there. These findings suggest that PINCH-1 functions as a molecular platform for coupling and uncoupling diverse cellular processes via overlapping but yet distinct domain interactions.     

LIM factor Lhx3 contributes to the specification of motor neuron and interneuron identity through cell-type-specific protein-protein interactions

LIM homeodomain codes regulate the development of many cell types, though it is poorly understood how these factors control gene expression in a cell-specific manner. Lhx3 is involved in the generation of two adjacent, but distinct, cell types for locomotion, motor neurons and V2 interneurons. Using in vivo function and protein interaction assays, we found that Lhx3 binds directly to the LIM cofactor NLI to trigger V2 interneuron differentiation. In motor neurons, however, Isl1 is available to compete for binding to NLI, displacing Lhx3 to a high-affinity binding site on the C-terminal region of Isl1 and thereby transforming Lhx3 from an interneuron-promoting factor to a motor neuron-promoting factor. This switching mechanism enables specific LIM complexes to form in each cell type and ensures that neuronal fates are tightly segregated.     

Early events in insect neurogenesis. II. The role of cell interactions and cell lineage in the determination of neuronal precursor cells

The insect central nervous system (CNS) is composed of a brain and a chain of segmental ganglia; each hemiganglion contains about 1000 individually identifiable neurons. How is the enormous neuronal diversity and specificity generated? Neurons of a hemiganglion largely arise during embryogenesis from a stereotyped pattern of individually identified neuronal precursor cells, called neuroblasts (NBs). The transition from ectoderm to individual neurons thus involves two major steps: first, an undifferentiated ectodermal cell sheet produces the stereotyped pattern of 30 NBs per hemisegment; second, each of these NBs contributes a specific family of neuronal progeny to the developing CNS. We have used a laser microbeam to ablate individual cells in the grasshopper embryo in order to study the initial events of neuronal determination. In particular, how does a layer of apparently equivalent ectodermal cells produce a highly stereotyped pattern of unique NBs? Our results suggest the following mechanism for NB determination. (1) Cell interactions between the approximately 150 equivalent ectodermal cells of a hemisegment allow 30 cells to enlarge into NBs. (2) As these young NBs enlarge they inhibit adjacent ectodermal cells from becoming NBs; the adjacent cells then either differentiate into nonneuronal support cells or die. (3) Each NB is assigned a unique identity due to its position of enlargement within the neuroepithelium. (4) The NB then generates its characteristic family of neurons by an invariant cell lineage. Development of the insect CNS depends on cell interactions and positional cues to create a pattern of NBs, and then on cell lineage to restrict the fate of the NB progeny.     

Roles for the tubulin- and PTP-PEST-binding paxillin LIM domains in cell adhesion and motility

Cell dynamics mediated through cell-extracellular matrix contacts, such as adhesion and motility involve the precise regulation of large complexes of structural and signaling molecules called focal adhesions (FAs). Paxillin is a multi-domain FA adaptor protein containing five amino-terminal paxillin leucine-aspartate repeat (LD) motifs and four carboxyl-terminal Lin-11 Isl-1 and Mec-3 (LIM) domains. The LD motifs support paxillin binding to actopaxin, integrin linked kinase (ILK), FA kinase (FAK), paxillin kinase linker (PKL) and vinculin. Of the LIM domains, LIM2 and 3 comprise the paxillin FA-targeting motif, with phosphorylation of these domains modulating paxillin targeting and cell adhesion to fibronectin (Fn). The identity of the paxillin FA targeting partner remains to be determined; however, the LIM domains mediate interactions with tubulin and the protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP)-PEST. PTP-PEST binding requires both LIM3 and 4, whereas, the precise LIM target of tubulin binding is not known. In this report, we demonstrate that the individual paxillin LIM2 and 3 domains support specific binding to tubulin and suggest a potential role for this interaction in the regulation of paxillin sub-cellular compartmentalization. In addition, expression of paxillin molecules with mutations in the tubulin- and PTP-PEST-binding LIM domains differentially impaired Chinese hamster ovary K1 (CHO.K1) cell adhesion and migration to Fn. Perturbation of LIM3 or 4 inhibited adhesion while mutation of LIM2 or 4 decreased cell motility. Interestingly, expression of tandem LIM2-3 inhibited cell adhesion and spreading while LIM3-4 stimulated a well-spread polarized phenotype. These data offer further support for a critical role for paxillin in cell adhesion and motility.     

Lineage, migration, and morphogenesis of longitudinal glia in the Drosophila CNS as revealed by a molecular lineage marker

Previous studies described three different classes of glial cells in the developing CNS of the early Drosophila embryo that prefigure and ensheath the major CNS axon tracts. Among these are 6 longitudinal glial cells on each side of each segment that overlie the longitudinal axon tracts. Here we use transformant lines carrying a P element containing a 130 bp sequence from the fushi tarazu gene in front of the lacZ reporter gene to direct beta-galactosidase expression in the longitudinal glia. Using this molecular lineage marker, we show that 1 of the "neuroblasts" in each hemisegment is actually a glioblast, which divides once symmetrically, in contrast to the typical asymmetric neuroblast divisions, producing 2 glial cells, which migrate medially and divide to generate the 6 longitudinal glial cells. As with neuroblasts, mutations in Notch and other neurogenic genes lead to supernumerary glioblasts. The results indicate that the glioblast is similar to other neuroblasts; however, the positionally specified fate of this blast cell is to generate a specific lineage of glia rather than a specific family of neurons.