Molecular cytogenetic analysis of eight inversion duplications of human chromosome 13q that each contain a neocentromere

Neocentromeres are fully functional centromeres that have arisen in previously noncentromeric chromosomal locations on rearranged chromosomes. The formation of neocentromeres results in the mitotic stability of chromosomal fragments that do not contain endogenous centromeres and that would normally be lost. Here we describe a unique collection of eight independent patient-derived cell lines, each of which contains a neocentromere on a supernumerary inversion duplication of a portion of human chromosome 13q. Findings in these patients reveal insight into the clinical manifestations associated with polysomy for portions of chromosome 13q. The results of FISH and immunofluorescent analysis of the neocentromeres in these chromosomes confirm the lack of alpha-satellite DNA and the presence of CENtromere proteins (CENP)-C, -E, and hMAD2. The positions of the inversion breakpoints in these chromosomes have been placed onto the physical map of chromosome 13, by means of FISH mapping with cosmid probes. These cell lines define, within chromosome 13q, at least three distinct locations where neocentromeres have formed, with five independent neocentromeres in band 13q32, two in band 13q21, and one in band 13q31. The results of examination of the set of 40 neocentromere-containing chromosomes that have thus far been described, including the 8 neocentromere-containing chromosomes from chromosome 13q that are described in the present study, suggest that chromosome 13q has an increased propensity for neocentromere formation, relative to some other human chromosomes. These neocentromeres will provide the means for testing hypotheses about sequence requirements for human centromere formation.     

First prenatally detected small supernumerary neocentromeric derivative chromosome 13 resulting in a non-mosaic partial tetrasomy 13q

Neocentromeres are functional centromeres located in non-centromeric euchromatic regions of chromosomes. The formation of neocentromeres results in conferring mitotic stability to chromosome fragments that do not contain centromeric alpha satellite DNA. We present a report of a prenatal diagnosis referred to cytogenetic studies due to ultrasound malformations such as large cisterna magna, no renal differentiation, hypotelorism and ventriculomegaly. Cytogenetic analysis of GTG-banded chromosomes from amniotic fluid cells and fetal blood cells revealed a de novo small supernumerary marker chromosome. Molecular cytogenetic studies using fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization showed this marker to be an inverted duplication of the distal portion of chromosome 13q which did not contain detectable alpha satellite DNA. The neocentromeric constriction was located at band 13q31. The presence of a functional neocentromere on this marker chromosome was confirmed by immunofluorescence with antibodies to centromere protein-C. The anatomopathologic study revealed a female fetus with facial dysmorphisms, low set ears and renal dysplasia. Ten small supernumerary neocentromeric chromosomes originating from the distal region of chromosome 13q have been reported to date. There are only three additional cases described with the location of the neocentromere in band 13q31. This is the first reported case detected prenatally.     

Neocentromeres Form Efficiently at Multiple Possible Loci in Candida albicans

Centromeres are critically important for chromosome stability and integrity. Most eukaryotes have regional centromeres that include long tracts of repetitive DNA packaged into pericentric heterochromatin. Neocentromeres, new sites of functional kinetochore assembly, can form at ectopic loci because no DNA sequence is strictly required for assembly of a functional kinetochore. In humans, neocentromeres often arise in cells with gross chromosome rearrangements that rescue an acentric chromosome. Here, we studied the properties of centromeres in Candida albicans, the most prevalent fungal pathogen of humans, which has small regional centromeres that lack pericentric heterochromatin. We functionally delimited centromere DNA on Chromosome 5 (CEN5) and then replaced the entire region with the counter-selectable URA3 gene or other marker genes. All of the resulting cen5Δ::URA3 transformants stably retained both copies of Chr5, indicating that a functional neocentromere had assembled efficiently on the homolog lacking CEN5 DNA. Strains selected to maintain only the cen5Δ::URA3 homolog and no wild-type Chr5 homolog also grew well, indicating that neocentromere function is independent of the presence of any wild-type CEN5 DNA. Two classes of neocentromere (neoCEN) strains were distinguishable: “proximal neoCEN” and “distal neoCEN” strains. Neocentromeres in the distal neoCEN strains formed at loci about 200–450 kb from cen5Δ::URA3 on either chromosome arm, as detected by massively parallel sequencing of DNA isolated by CENP-A^Cse4p chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). In the proximal neoCEN strains, the neocentromeres formed directly adjacent to cen5Δ::URA3 and moved onto the URA3 DNA, resulting in silencing of its expression. Functional neocentromeres form efficiently at several possible loci that share properties of low gene density and flanking repeated DNA sequences. Subsequently, neocentromeres can move locally, which can be detected by silencing of an adjacent URA3 gene, or can relocate to entirely different regions of the chromosome. The ability to select for neocentromere formation and movement in C. albicans permits mechanistic analysis of the assembly and maintenance of a regional centromere.     

Formation of novel CENP-A domains on tandem repetitive DNA and across chromosome breakpoints on human chromosome 8q21 neocentromeres

Endogenous human centromeres form on megabase-sized arrays of tandemly repeated alpha satellite DNA. Human neocentromeres form epigenetically at ectopic sites devoid of alpha satellite DNA and permit analysis of centromeric DNA and chromatin organization. In this study, we present molecular cytogenetic and CENP-A chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on CHIP analyses of two neocentromeres that have formed in chromosome band 8q21 each with a unique DNA and CENP-A chromatin configuration. The first neocentromere was found on a neodicentric chromosome 8 with an inactivated endogenous centromere, where the centromeric activity and CENP-A domain were repositioned to band 8q21 on a large tandemly repeated DNA. This is the first example of a neocentromere forming on repetitive DNA, as all other mapped neocentromeres have formed on single copy DNA. Quantitative fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis showed a 60% reduction in the alpha satellite array size at the inactive centromere compared to the active centromere on the normal chromosome 8. This neodicentric chromosome may provide insight into centromere inactivation and the role of tandem DNA in centromere structure. The second neocentromere was found on a neocentric ring chromosome that contained the 8q21 tandemly repeated DNA, although the neocentromere was localized to a different genomic region. Interestingly, this neocentromere is composed of two distinct CENP-A domains in bands 8q21 and 8q24, which are brought into closer proximity on the ring chromosome. This neocentromere suggests that chromosomal rearrangement and DNA breakage may be involved in neocentromere formation. These novel examples provide insight into the formation and structure of human neocentromeres.     

Genome characterization and CRISPR-Cas9 editing of a human neocentromere

The maintenance of genome integrity is ensured by proper chromosome inheritance during mitotic and meiotic cell divisions. The chromosomal counterpart responsible for chromosome segregation to daughter cells is the centromere, at which the spindle apparatus attaches through the kinetochore. Although all mammalian centromeres are primarily composed of megabase-long repetitive sequences, satellite-free human neocentromeres have been described. Neocentromeres and evolutionary new centromeres have revolutionized traditional knowledge about centromeres. Over the past 20 years, insights have been gained into their organization, but in spite of these advancements, the mechanisms underlying their formation and evolution are still unclear. Today, through modern and increasingly accessible genome editing and long-read sequencing techniques, research in this area is undergoing a sudden acceleration. In this article, we describe the primary sequence of a previously described human chromosome 3 neocentromere and observe its possible evolution and repair results after a chromosome breakage induced through CRISPR-Cas9 technologies. Our data represent an exciting advancement in the field of centromere/neocentromere evolution and chromosome stability.

     

Neocentromeres: new insights into centromere structure, disease development, and karyotype evolution

Since the discovery of the first human neocentromere in 1993, these spontaneous, ectopic centromeres have been shown to be an astonishing example of epigenetic change within the genome. Recent research has focused on the role of neocentromeres in evolution and speciation, as well as in disease development and the understanding of the organization and epigenetic maintenance of the centromere. Here, we review recent progress in these areas of research and the significant insights gained.     

Prenatal molecular cytogenetic diagnosis of partial tetrasomy 10p due to neocentromere formation in an inversion duplication analphoid marker chromosome

Neocentromeres are fully functional centromeres found on rearranged or marker chromosomes that have separated from endogenous centromeres. Neocentromeres often result in partial tri- or tetrasomy because their formation confers mitotic stability to acentric chromosome fragments that would normally be lost. We describe the prenatal identification and characterization of a de novo supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) containing a neocentromere in a 20-wk fetus by the combined use of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). GTG-banding of fetal metaphases revealed a 47,XY,+mar karyotype in 100% of cultured amniocytes; parental karyotypes were both normal. Although sequential tricolor FISH using chromosome-specific painting probes identified a chromosome 10 origin of the marker, a complete panel of chromosome-specific centromeric satellite DNA probes failed to hybridize to any portion of the marker. The presence of a neocentromere on the marker chromosome was confirmed by the absence of hybridization of an all-human-centromere alpha-satellite DNA probe, which hybridizes to all normal centromeres, and the presence of centromere protein (CENP)-C, which is associated specifically with active kinetochores. Based on CGH analysis and FISH with a chromosome 10p subtelomeric probe, the marker was found to be an inversion duplication of the distal portion of chromosome 10p. Thus, the proband's karyotype was 47,XY,+inv dup(10)(pter-->p14 approximately 15::p14 approximately 15-->neo-->pter), which is the first report of partial tetrasomy 10p resulting from an analphoid marker chromosome with a neocentromere. This study illustrates the use of several molecular strategies in distinguishing centric alphoid markers from neocentric analphoid markers.     

A 330 kb CENP-A binding domain and altered replication timing at a human neocentromere

Centromere protein A (CENP-A) is an essential centromere-specific histone H3 homologue. Using combined chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA array analysis, we have defined a 330 kb CENP-A binding domain of a 10q25.3 neocentromere found on the human marker chromosome mardel(10). This domain is situated adjacent to the 80 kb region identified previously as the neocentromere site through lower-resolution immunofluorescence/FISH analysis of metaphase chromosomes. The 330 kb CENP-A binding domain shows a depletion of histone H3, providing evidence for the replacement of histone H3 by CENP-A within centromere-specific nucleosomes. The DNA within this domain has a high AT-content comparable to that of alpha-satellite, a high prevalence of LINEs and tandem repeats, and fewer SINEs and potential genes than the surrounding region. FISH analysis indicates that the normal 10q25.3 genomic region replicates around mid-S phase. Neocentromere formation is accompanied by a replication time lag around but not within the CENP-A binding region, with this lag being significantly more prominent to one side. The availability of fully sequenced genomic markers makes human neocentromeres a powerful model for dissecting the functional domains of complex higher eukaryotic centromeres.     

Analysis of mitotic and expression properties of human neocentromere-based transchromosomes in mice

Human neocentromeres are functional centromeres that are devoid of the typical human centromeric alpha-satellite DNA. We have transferred a 60-Mb chromosome 10-derived neocentric marker chromosome, mardel(10), and its truncated 3.5-Mb derivative, NC-MiC1, into mouse embryonic stem cell and have demonstrated a relatively high structural and mitotic stability of the transchromosomes in a heterologous genetic background. We have also produced chimeric mice carrying mardel(10) or NC-MiC1. Both transchromosomes were detected as intact episomal entities in a variety of adult chimeric mouse tissues including hemopoietic stem cells. Genes residing on these transchromosomes were expressed in the different tissues tested. Meiotic transmission of both transchromosomes in the chimeric mice was evident from the detection of DNA from these chromosomes in sperm samples. In particular, germ line transmission of NC-MiC1 was demonstrated in the F1 embryos of the chimeric mice. Variable (low in mardel(10)- or NC-MiC1-containing embryonic stem cells and chimeric mouse tissues and relatively high in NC-MiC1-containing F1 embryos) levels of missegregation of these transchromosomes were detected, suggesting that they are not optimally predisposed to full mitotic regulation in the mouse background, particularly during early embryogenesis. These results provide promising data in support of the potential use of neocentromere-based human marker chromosomes and minichromosomes as a tool for the study of centromere, neocentromere, and chromosome biology and for gene therapy studies in a mouse model system. They also highlight the need to further understand and overcome the factors that are responsible for the definable rates of instability of these transchromosomes in a mouse model.     

Co-localization of CENP-C and CENP-H to discontinuous domains of CENP-A chromatin at human neocentromeres

Background  

Mammalian centromere formation is dependent on chromatin that contains centromere protein (CENP)-A, which is the centromere-specific histone H3 variant. Human neocentromeres have acquired CENP-A chromatin epigenetically in ectopic chromosomal locations on low-copy complex DNA. Neocentromeres permit detailed investigation of centromeric chromatin organization that is not possible in the highly repetitive alpha satellite DNA present at endogenous centromeres.     

Independently regulated neocentromere activity of two classes of tandem repeat arrays

Tandem repeat arrays often are found in interstitial (i.e., normally gene-rich) regions on chromosomes. In maize, genes on abnormal chromosome 10 induce the tandem repeats that make up knobs to move poleward on the meiotic spindle. This so-called neocentromere activity results in the preferential recovery, or meiotic drive, of the knobs in progeny. Here we show that two classes of repeats differ in their capacity to form neocentromeres and that their motility is controlled in trans by at least two repeat-specific activators. Microtubule dynamics appear to contribute little to the movement of neocentromeres (they are active in the presence of taxol), suggesting that the mechanism of motility involves microtubule-based motors. These data suggest that maize knob repeats and their binding proteins have coevolved to ensure their preferential recovery in progeny. Neocentromere-mediated drive provides a plausible mechanism for the evolution and maintenance of repeat arrays that occur in interstitial positions.     

Evolutionary and clinical neocentromeres: two faces of the same coin?

It has been hypothesized that human clinical neocentromeres and evolutionary novel centromeres (ENC) represent two faces of the same phenomenon. However, there are only two reports of loci harboring both a novel centromere and a clinical neocentromere. We suggest that only the tip of the iceberg has been scratched because most neocentromerization events have a very low chance of being observed. In support of this view, we report here on a neocentromere at 9q33.1 that emerged in a ring chromosome of about 12 Mb. The ring was produced by a balanced rearrangement that was fortuitously discovered because of its malsegregation in the propositus. Chromatin-immunoprecipitation-on-chip experiments using anti-centromere protein (CENP)-A and anti-CENP-C antibodies strongly indicated that a novel centromeric domain was present in the ring, in a chromosomal domain where an ENC emerged in the ancestor to Old World monkeys.     

Direct Cloning of Human 10q25 Neocentromere DNA Using Transformation-Associated Recombination (TAR) in Yeast

The transformation-associated recombination (TAR) procedure allows rapid, site-directed cloning of specific human chromosomal regions as yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs). The procedure requires knowledge of only a single, relatively small genomic sequence that resides adjacent to the chromosomal region of interest. We applied this approach to the cloning of the neocentromere DNA of a marker chromosome that we have previously shown to have originated through the activation of a latent centromere at human chromosome 10q25. Using a unique 1.4-kb DNA fragment as a “hook” in TAR experiments, we achieved single-step isolation of the critical neocentromere DNA region as two stable, 110- and 80-kb circular YACs. For obtaining large quantities of highly purified DNA, these YACs were retrofitted with the yeast–bacteria–mammalian-cells shuttle vector BRV1, electroporated intoEscherichia coliDH10B, and isolated as bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs). Extensive characterization of these YACs and BACs by PCR and restriction analyses revealed that they are identical to the corresponding regions of the normal chromosome 10 and provided further support for the formation of the neocentromere within the marker chromosome through epigenetic activation.     

Cytogenetic analysis and construction of a BAC contig across a common neocentromeric region from 9p

Over 40 cases of neocentric marker chromosomes, without detectable alpha-satellite DNA, have been reported. Although these have originated from many different chromosomes, a few of these chromosomes have been involved in multiple cases of marker formation. In this study, two different markers originating from the short arm of chromosome 9 were analyzed, identifying a common neocentromeric region. A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) contig extending over more than 900 kb has been assembled across this neocentromeric region. Fluorescent in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence assays (CENP-C and CENP-E) have localized the neocentromere to a 500 kb region. Preliminary analysis of DNA sequences in this neocentromere revealed a highly AT-rich region, which also has an increase in the level of retroviral elements compared with the average levels in the genome.     

Transmission of a fully functional human neocentromere through three generations

An unusual Y chromosome with a primary constriction inside the long-arm heterochromatin was found in the amniocytes of a 38-year-old woman. The same Y chromosome was found in her husband and brother-in-law, thus proving that it was already present in the father. FISH with alphoid DNA showed hybridization signals at the usual position of the Y centromere but not at the primary constriction. Centromere proteins (CENP)-A, CENP-C, and CENP-E could not be detected at the site of the canonic centromere but were present at the new constriction, whereas CENP-B was not detected on this Y chromosome. Experiments with 82 Y-specific loci distributed throughout the chromosome confirmed that no gross deletion or rearrangement had taken place, and that the Y chromosome belonged to a haplogroup whose members have a mean alphoid array of 770 kb (range 430-1,600 kb), whereas that of this case was approximately 250 kb. Thus, this Y chromosome appeared to be deleted for part of the alphoid DNA. It seems likely that this deletion was responsible for the silencing of the normal centromere and that the activation of the neocentromere prevented the loss of this chromosome. Alternatively, neocentromere activation could have occurred first and stimulated inactivation of the normal centromere by partial deletion. Whatever the mechanism, the presence of this chromosome in three generations demonstrates that it functions sufficiently well in mitosis for male sex determination and fertility and that neocentromeres can be transmitted normally at meiosis.     

Rye terminal neocentromeres: characterisation of the underlying DNA and chromatin structure

We have studied rye plants with neocentromeres on the terminal regions of the chromosomes. These neocentromeres only appear in meiosis, they are active together with the normal centromere and move the chromosomal arms polewards from prometaphase to anaphase at both the first and second meiotic divisions. All chromosomes of the normal set may show neocentric activity, but chromosomal arms with terminal heterochromatic blocks, as assessed by C-banding, are significantly more susceptible than those that do not have them. At least three repetitive sequences underlie the neocentromeres: pSc34, pSc74 and pSc200. These sequences are not detectable in B chromosomes, which never showed neocentric activity. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation with these sequences used as probes revealed elongated chromatin extensions on the neocentromeres that have not been observed using other staining techniques. These extensions were never observed in control plants. They suggest a modified chromatin structure, which might be responsible for the interaction with proteins involved in chromosomal movement on the spindle.