Neurotransmitters of the retino-hypothalamic tract

The brain's biological clock, which, in mammals, is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), generates circadian rhythms in behaviour and physiology. These biological rhythms are adjusted daily (entrained) to the environmental light/dark cycle via a monosynaptic retinofugal pathway, the retinohypothalamic tract (RHT). In this review, the anatomical and physiological evidence for glutamate and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) as principal transmitters of the RHT will be considered. A combination of immunohistochemistry at both the light- and electron-microscopic levels and tract-tracing studies have revealed that these two transmitters are co-stored in a subpopulation of retinal ganglion cells projecting to the retino-recipient zone of the ventral SCN. The PACAP/glutamate-containing cells, which constitute the RHT, also contain a recently identified photoreceptor protein, melanopsin, which may function as a "circadian photopigment". In vivo and in vitro studies have shown that glutamate and glutamate agonists such as N-methyl- D-aspartate mimic light-induced phase shifts and that application of glutamate antagonists blocks light-induced phase shifts at subjective night indicating that glutamate mediates light signalling to the clock. PACAP in nanomolar concentrations has similar phase-shifting capacity as light and glutamate, whereas PACAP in micromolar concentrations modulates glutamate-induced phase shifts. Possible targets for PACAP and glutamate are the recently identified clock genes Per1 and Per2, which are induced in the SCN by light, glutamate and PACAP at night.     

5-HT1B receptor knockout mice exhibit an enhanced response to constant light

Serotonin (5-HT) can act presynaptically at 5-HT1B receptors on retinal terminals in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) to inhibit glutamate release, thereby modulating the effects of light on circadian behavior. 5-HT1B receptor agonists (1) inhibit light-induced phase shifts of circadian activity rhythms, (2) attenuate light-induced Fos expression in the SCN, and (3) reduce the amplitude of optic nerve-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents in SCN neurons in vitro. To determine whether functional disruption of the 5-HT1B presynaptic receptors would result in an amplified response of the SCN to light, the period (tau) of the circadian rhythm of wheel-running activity was estimated under several different conditions in 5-HT1B receptor knockout (KO) mice and genetically matched wild-type animals. Under constant light (LL) conditions, the tau of 5-HT1B receptor KO mice was significantly greater than the tau of wild-type mice. A quantitative analysis of the wheel-running activity revealed no differences between wild-type and KO mice in either total activity or the temporal distribution of activity under LL conditions, suggesting that the observed increase in tau was not a function of reduced activity. Under constant dark conditions, the period of the circadian rhythm of wheel-running activity of wild-type and 5-HT1B receptor KO mice was similar. In addition, no differences were noted between wild-type and 5-HT1B receptor KO mice in the rate of reentrainment to a 6 h phase advance in the 12:12 light:dark cycle or in phase shifts in response to a 10 min light pulse presented at circadian time 16. The enhanced response of the SCN circadian clock of the 5-HT1B receptor KO mice to LL conditions is consistent with the hypothesis that the endogenous activation of 5-HT1B presynaptic receptors modulates circadian behavior by attenuating photic input to the SCN.     

Mice lacking the PACAP type I receptor have impaired photic entrainment and negative masking

The retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) is a retinofugal neuronal pathway which, in mammals, mediates nonimage-forming vision to various areas in the brain involved in circadian timing, masking behavior, and regulation of the pupillary light reflex. The RHT costores the two neurotransmitters glutamate and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP), which in a rather complex interplay are mediators of photic adjustment of the circadian system. To further characterize the role of PACAP/PACAP receptor type 1 (PAC1) receptor signaling in light entrainment of the clock and in negative masking behavior, we extended previous studies in mice lacking the PAC1 receptor (PAC1 KO) by examining their phase response to single light pulses using Aschoff type II regime, their ability to entrain to non-24-h light-dark (LD) cycles and large phase shifts of the LD cycle (jet lag), as well as their negative masking response during different light intensities. A prominent finding in PAC1 KO mice was a significantly decreased phase delay of the endogenous rhythm at early night. In accordance, PAC1 KO mice had a reduced ability to entrain to T cycles longer than 26 h and needed more time to reentrain to large phase delays, which was prominent at low light intensities. The data obtained at late night indicated that PACAP/PAC1 receptor signaling is less important during the phase-advancing part of the phase-response curve. Finally, the PAC1 KO mice showed impaired negative masking behavior at low light intensities. Our findings substantiate a role for PACAP/PAC1 receptor signaling in nonimage-forming vision and indicate that the system is particularly important at lower light intensities.     

Photic resetting of the human circadian pacemaker in the absence of conscious vision

Ocular light exposure patterns are the primary stimuli for entraining the human circadian system to the local 24-h day. Many totally blind persons cannot use these stimuli and, therefore, have circadian rhythms that are not entrained. However, a few otherwise totally blind persons retain the ability to suppress plasma melatonin concentrations after ocular light exposure, probably using a neural pathway that includes the site of the human circadian pacemaker, suggesting that light information is reaching this site. To test definitively whether ocular light exposure could affect the circadian pacemaker of some blind persons and whether melatonin suppression in response to bright light correlates with light-induced phase shifts of thecircadian system, the authorsperformed experiments with 5 totally blind volunteers using a protocol known to induce phase shifts of the circadian pacemaker in sighted individuals. In the 2 blind individuals who maintained light-induced melatonin suppression, the circadian system was shifted by appropriately timed bright-light stimuli. These data demonstrate that light can affect the circadian pacemaker of some totally blind individuals--either by altering the phase of the circadian pacemaker or by affecting its amplitude. They are consistent with data from animal studies demonstrating that there are different neural pathways and retinal cells that relay photic information to the brain: one for conscious light perception and the other for non-image-forming functions.     

Reduced hypothermic and hypnotic responses to ethanol in PACAP-deficient mice

Using pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP)-deficient mice, we investigated whether PACAP is involved in the intoxicating effects of ethanol. The structure of PACAP is highly conserved during evolution, and in Drosophila, loss-of-function mutations in a PACAP-like neuropeptide gene, amnesiac, result in impairment of memory retention and increased sensitivity to ethanol. In mice, PACAP deficiency is associated with impaired memory performance and hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), however, sensitivity to ethanol has not been well investigated. Here, we addressed this issue in our recently developed PACAP-deficient mice. Sleep time (duration of the loss of righting reflex) was markedly shortened in PACAP-deficient mice compared with wild-type, although latency to the loss of righting reflex was not different between the two groups. Ethanol-induced hypothermia in wild-type control mice was significantly reduced in PACAP-deficient mice. Blood ethanol levels were not different between the two groups, excluding the possibility of increased ethanol metabolism. Thus, in contrast to that in Drosophila, PACAP deficiency in mammals caused a reduced sensitivity to ethanol. However, in both cases, PACAP or amnesiac products are likely to play significant roles in modifying the intoxicating effects of ethanol.     

Endogenous PACAP acts as a stress response peptide to protect cerebellar neurons from ethanol or oxidative insult

The rodent cerebellum is richly supplied with PACAPergic innervation. Exogenous pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) increases cerebellar granule cell survival and differentiation in culture, and enhances the number of neuroblasts in the molecular and internal granule cell layers (IGL) when injected postnatally into the cerebellum in vivo. Here, we have investigated the role of endogenous PACAP during cerebellar development by comparing the morphology of normal and PACAP-deficient mouse cerebellum, and the response of cerebellar granule cells from normal and PACAP-deficient mice subjected to neurotoxic insult in culture. There was no difference in cerebellar volume or granule cell number, in 11-day-old wild type versus PACAP-deficient mice. Cultured cerebellar neurons from PACAP-deficient and wild type mice also showed no apparent differences in survival and differentiation either under depolarizing conditions, or non-depolarizing conditions in the presence or absence of either dibutyryl cAMP or 100 nM PACAP. However, cultured cerebellar neurons from PACAP-deficient mice were significantly more sensitive than wild type neurons to ethanol- or hydrogen peroxide-induced toxicity. Differential ethanol toxicity was reversed by addition of 100 nM exogenous PACAP, suggesting that endogenous PACAP has neuroprotective activity in the context of cellular insult or stress. The neuroprotective action of PACAP was mimicked by dibutryl cAMP, indicating that it occurred via activation of adenylate cyclase. These results indicate that PACAP might act to protect the brain from paraphysiological insult, including exposure to toxins or hypoxia.     

Effects of prolonged exposure to darkness on circadian photic responsiveness in the mouse

Circadian rhythms in mammals are generated by an endogenous pacemaker but are modulated by environmental cycles, principally the alternation of light and darkness. Although much is known about nonparametric effects of light on the circadian system, little is known about other effects of photic stimulation. In the present study, which consists of a series of five experiments in mice, various manipulations of photic stimulation were used to dissect the mechanisms responsible for a variation in the magnitude of light-induced phase-shifts that results from prolonged exposure to darkness. The results confirmed previous observations that prolonged exposure to darkness causes an increase in the magnitude of phase shifts (both phase advances and phase delays) evoked by discrete light pulses. The results also indicated that the increase in responsiveness results from the lack of exposure to light per se and not from collateral effects of exposure to constant darkness such as the lack of previous entrainment. The lack of exposure to light causes the circadian system to undergo a process of dark adaptation similar to dark adaptation in the visual system but with a much slower temporal course. The results suggest that circadian dark adaptation may take place at the retinal level, but it is not clear whether it involves a change in the sensitivity or maximal responsiveness of the system.     

Effects of Prolonged Exposure to Darkness on Circadian Photic Responsiveness in the Mouse

Circadian rhythms in mammals are generated by an endogenous pacemaker but are modulated by environmental cycles, principally the alternation of light and darkness. Although much is known about nonparametric effects of light on the circadian system, little is known about other effects of photic stimulation. In the present study, which consists of a series of five experiments in mice, various manipulations of photic stimulation were used to dissect the mechanisms responsible for a variation in the magnitude of light-induced phase-shifts that results from prolonged exposure to darkness. The results confirmed previous observations that prolonged exposure to darkness causes an increase in the magnitude of phase shifts (both phase advances and phase delays) evoked by discrete light pulses. The results also indicated that the increase in responsiveness results from the lack of exposure to light per se and not from collateral effects of exposure to constant darkness such as the lack of previous entrainment. The lack of exposure to light causes the circadian system to undergo a process of dark adaptation similar to dark adaptation in the visual system but with a much slower temporal course. The results suggest that circadian dark adaptation may take place at the retinal level, but it is not clear whether it involves a change in the sensitivity or maximal responsiveness of the system.     

Loss of dexras1 alters nonphotic circadian phase shifts and reveals a role for the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) in gene-targeted mice

Loss of Dexras1 in gene-targeted mice impairs circadian entrainment to light cycles and produces complex changes to phase-dependent resetting responses (phase shifts) to light. The authors now describe greatly enhanced and phase-specific nonphotic responses induced by arousal in dexras1(-/-) mice. In constant conditions, mutant mice exhibited significant arousal-induced phase shifts throughout the subjective day. Unusual phase advances in the late subjective night were also produced when arousal has little effect in mice. Bilateral lesions of the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) completely eliminated both the nonphotic as well as the light-induced phase shifts of circadian locomotor rhythms during the subjective day, but had no effect on nighttime phase shifts. The expression of FOS-like protein in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was not affected by either photic or nonphotic stimulation in the subjective day in either genotype. Therefore, the loss of Dexras1 (1) enhances nonphotic phase shifts in a phase-dependent manner, and (2) demonstrates that the IGL in mice is a primary mediator of circadian phase-resetting responses to both photic and nonphotic events during the subjective day, but plays a different functional role in the subjective night. Furthermore, (3) the change in FOS level does not appear to be a critical step in the entrainment pathways for either light or arousal during the subjective day. The cumulative evidence suggests that Dexras1 regulates multiple photic and nonphotic signal-transduction pathways, thereby playing an essential role modulating species-specific characteristics of circadian entrainment.     

PACAP-Deficient Mice Exhibit Light Parameter–Dependent Abnormalities on Nonvisual Photoreception and Early Activity Onset

Background

The photopigment melanopsin has been suggested to act as a dominant photoreceptor in nonvisual photoreception including resetting of the circadian clock (entrainment), direct tuning or masking of vital status (activity, sleep/wake cycles, etc.), and the pupillary light reflex (PLR). Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is exclusively coexpressed with melanopsin in a small subset of retinal ganglion cells and is predicted to be involved extensively in these responses; however, there were inconsistencies in the previous reports, and its functional role has not been well understood.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here we show that PACAP-deficient mice exhibited severe dysfunctions of entrainment in a time-dependent manner. The abnormalities in the mutant mice were intensity-dependent in phase delay and duration-dependent in phase advance. The knockout mice also displayed blunted masking, which was dependent on lighting conditions, but not completely lost. The dysfunctions of masking in the mutant mice were recovered by infusion of PACAP-38. By contrast, these mutant mice show a normal PLR. We examined the retinal morphology and innervations in the mutant mice, and no apparent changes were observed in melanopsin-immunoreactive cells. These data suggest that the dysfunctions of entrainment and masking were caused by the loss of PACAP, not by the loss of light input itself. Moreover, PACAP-deficient mice express an unusually early onset of activities, from approximately four hours before the dark period, without influencing the phase of the endogenous circadian clock.

Conclusions/Significance

Although some groups including us reported the abnormalities in photic entrainments in PACAP- and PAC₁-knockout mice, there were inconsistencies in their results [1], [2], [3], [4]. The time-dependent dysfunctions of photic entrainment in the PACAP-knockout mice described in this paper can integrate the incompatible data in previous reports. The recovery of impaired masking by infusion of PACAP-38 in the mutant mice is the first direct evidence of the relationship between PACAP and masking. These results indicate that PACAP regulates particular nonvisual light responses by conveying parametric light information—that is, intensity and duration. The “early-bird” phenotype in the mutant mice originally reported in this paper supposed that PACAP also has a critical role in daily behavioral patterns, especially during the light-to-dark transition period.     

Functional diversities of two activity components of circadian rhythm in genetical splitting mice (CS strain)

CS mice, an inbred strain, showed two distinctive characteristics in the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity: (1) large variation in the freerunning period, and (2) spontaneous rhythm splitting under continuous darkness. In the splitting rhythm there was a positive correlation between the freerunning period of the evening component and the activity time of the morning component. The phase-shifting effect of a 15-min light pulse was examined on the two activity components of the splitting rhythm. There were significant differences in the amount of light-induced phase response between the two components. A light pulse during the late subjective night induced a phase advance shift only in the morning component, while a light pulse during the early subjective night induced a phase delay shift only in the evening component. These results indicate functional diversities of the two activity components in the circadian locomotor rhythm of CS mice, and suggest that the circadian system in CS mice consists of two mutually coupled oscillators which have different circadian periods and different responsiveness to light. The CS mouse is a useful model to explore a genetic background of oscillator coupling in the circadian system of nocturnal rodents. Accepted: 19 November 1998     

TheBulla ocular circadian pacemaker

In an effort to understand the cellular basis of entrainment of circadian oscillators we have studied the role of membrane potential changes in the neurons which comprise the ocular circadian pacemaker of Bulla gouldiana in mediating phase shifts of the ocular circadian rhythm. We report that: 1. Intracellular recording was used to measure directly the effects of the phase shifting agents light, serotonin, and 8-bromo-cAMP on the membrane potential of the basal retinal neurons. We found that light pulses evoke a transient depolarization followed by a smaller sustained depolarization. Application of serotonin produced a biphasic response; a transient depolarization followed by a sustained hyperpolarization. Application of a membrane permeable analog of the intracellular second messenger cAMP, 8-bromo-cAMP, elicited sustained hyperpolarization, and occasionally a weak phasic depolarization. 2. Changing the membrane potential of the basal retinal neurons directly and selectively with intracellularly injected current phase shifts the ocular circadian rhythm. Both depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current can shift the phase of the circadian oscillator. Depolarizing current mimics the phase shifting action of light, while hyperpolarizing current produces phase shifts which are transposed approximately 180 degrees in circadian time to depolarization. 3. Altering BRN membrane potential with ionic treatments, depolarizing with elevated K+ seawater or hyperpolarizing with lowered Na+ seawater, produces phase shifts similar to current injection. 4. The light-induced depolarization of the basal retinal neurons is necessary for phase shifts by light. Suppressing the light-induced depolarization with injected current inhibits light-induced phase shifts. 5. The ability of membrane potential changes to shift oscillator phase is dependent on extracellular calcium. Reducing extracellular free Ca++ from 10 mM to 1.3 X 10(-7) M inhibits light-induced phase shifts without blocking the photic response of the BRNs. The results indicate that changes in the membrane potential of the pacemaker neurons play a critical role in phase shifting the circadian rhythm, and imply that a voltage-dependent and calcium-dependent process, possibly Ca++ influx, shifts oscillator phase in response to light.     

Photic sensitivity for circadian response to light varies with photoperiod

The response of the circadian system to light varies markedly depending on photic history. Under short day lengths, hamsters exhibit larger maximal light-induced phase shifts as compared with those under longer photoperiods. However, effects of photoperiod length on sensitivity to subsaturating light remain unknown. Here, Syrian hamsters were entrained to long or short photoperiods and subsequently exposed to a 15-min light pulse across a range of irradiances (0-68.03 μW/cm(2)) to phase shift activity rhythms. Phase advances exhibited a dose response, with increasing irradiances eliciting greater phase resetting in both conditions. Photic sensitivity, as measured by the half-saturation constant, was increased 40-fold in the short photoperiod condition. In addition, irradiances that generated similar phase advances under short and long days produced equivalent phase delays, and equal photon doses produced larger delays in the short photoperiod condition. Mechanistically, equivalent light exposure induced greater pERK, PER1, and cFOS immunoreactivity in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of animals under shorter days. Patterns of immunoreactivity in all 3 proteins were related to the size of the phase shift rather than the intensity of the photic stimulus, suggesting that photoperiod modulation of light sensitivity lies upstream of these events within the signal transduction cascade. This modulation of light sensitivity by photoperiod means that considerably less light is necessary to elicit a circadian response under the relatively shorter days of winter, extending upon the known seasonal changes in sensitivity of sensory systems. Further characterizing the mechanisms by which photoperiod alters photic response may provide a potent tool for optimizing light treatment for circadian and affective disorders in humans.     

Response of the mouse circadian system to serotonin 1A/2/7 agonists in vivo: surprisingly little

Serotonin (5-HT) is thought to play a role in regulating nonphotic phase shifts and modulating photic phase shifts of the mammalian circadian system, but results with different species (rats vs. hamsters) and techniques (in vivo vs. in vitro; systemic vs. intracerebral drug delivery) have been discordant. Here we examined the effects of the 5-HT1A/7 agonist 8-OH-DPAT and the 5-HT1/2 agonist quipazine on the circadian system in mice, with some parallel experiments conducted with hamsters for comparative purposes. In mice, neither drug, delivered systemically at a range of circadian phases and doses, induced phase shifts significantly different from vehicle injections. In hamsters, quipazine intraperitoneally (i.p.) did not induce phase shifts, whereas 8-OH-DPAT induced phase shifts after i.p. but not intra-SCN injections. In mice, quipazine modestly increased c-Fos expression in the SCN (site of the circadian pacemaker) during the subjective day, whereas 8-OH-DPAT did not affect SCN c-Fos. In hamsters, both drugs suppressed SCN c-Fos in the subjective day. In both species, both drugs strongly induced c-Fos in the paraventricular nucleus (within-subject positive control). 8-OH-DPAT did not significantly attenuate light-induced phase shifts in mice but did in hamsters (between-species positive control). These results indicate that in the intact mouse in vivo, acute activation of 5-HT1A/2/7 receptors in the circadian system is not sufficient to reset the SCN pacemaker or to oppose phase-shifting effects of light. There appear to be significant species differences in the susceptibility of the circadian system to modulation by systemically delivered serotonergics.     

The circadian system of Trypanosoma cruzi-infected mice

The effects of Chagas disease on the mammalian circadian system were studied in Trypanosoma cruzi-infected C57-Bl6J mice. Animals were inoculated with CAI or RA strains of T. cruzi or vehicle, parasitism confirmed by blood specimen visualization and locomotor activity rhythms analyzed by wheel-running recording. RA-strain infected mice exhibited significantly decreased amplitude of circadian rhythms, both under light-dark and constant dark conditions, probably due to motor deficiencies. CAI-treated animals showed normal locomotor activity rhythms. However, in these mice, reentrainment to a 6h phase shift of the LD cycle took significantly longer than controls, and application of 15min light pulses in DD produced smaller phase delays of the rhythms. All groups exhibited light-induced Fos expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei. We conclude that the main effect of T. cruzi infection on the circadian system is an impairment of the motor output from the clock toward controlled rhythms, together with an effect on circadian visual sensitivity.     

Loss of dexras1 Alters Nonphotic Circadian Phase Shifts and Reveals a Role for the Intergeniculate Leaflet (IGL) in Gene-Targeted Mice

Loss of Dexras1 in gene-targeted mice impairs circadian entrainment to light cycles and produces complex changes to phase-dependent resetting responses (phase shifts) to light. The authors now describe greatly enhanced and phase-specific nonphotic responses induced by arousal in dexras1^?/? mice. In constant conditions, mutant mice exhibited significant arousal-induced phase shifts throughout the subjective day. Unusual phase advances in the late subjective night were also produced when arousal has little effect in mice. Bilateral lesions of the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) completely eliminated both the nonphotic as well as the light-induced phase shifts of circadian locomotor rhythms during the subjective day, but had no effect on nighttime phase shifts. The expression of FOS-like protein in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was not affected by either photic or nonphotic stimulation in the subjective day in either genotype. Therefore, the loss of Dexras1 (1) enhances nonphotic phase shifts in a phase-dependent manner, and (2) demonstrates that the IGL in mice is a primary mediator of circadian phase-resetting responses to both photic and nonphotic events during the subjective day, but plays a different functional role in the subjective night. Furthermore, (3) the change in FOS level does not appear to be a critical step in the entrainment pathways for either light or arousal during the subjective day. The cumulative evidence suggests that Dexras1 regulates multiple photic and nonphotic signal-transduction pathways, thereby playing an essential role modulating species-specific characteristics of circadian entrainment. (Author correspondence: ralph@psych.utoronto.ca)     

NMDA as well as non-NMDA receptor antagonists can prevent the phase-shifting effects of light on the circadian system of the golden hamster.

The present experiments were designed to evaluate whether the intraventricular administration of excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptor antagonists would prevent light-induced phase shifts of the circadian rhythm of wheel-running activity in the hamster. Administration of the non-N-methyl-D-aspartate (non-NMDA) antagonist 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) blocked light-induced phase advances and delays. Similarly, administration of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, 3(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-propyl-l-phosphonic acid (CPP), prevented light-induced phase advances and delays. Neither drug by itself caused any consistent effect on the phase of the rhythm. These data provide further evidence that EAA receptors mediate the effects of light on the circadian system, and suggest that both NMDA and non-NMDA receptor types may be involved.     

Deletion of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors 2 and 3 (mGlu2 & mGlu3) in Mice Disrupts Sleep and Wheel-Running Activity,and Increases the Sensitivity of the Circadian System to Light

Sleep and/or circadian rhythm disruption (SCRD) is seen in up to 80% of schizophrenia patients. The co-morbidity of schizophrenia and SCRD may in part stem from dysfunction in common brain mechanisms, which include the glutamate system, and in particular, the group II metabotropic glutamate receptors mGlu2 and mGlu3 (encoded by the genes Grm2 and Grm3). These receptors are relevant to the pathophysiology and potential treatment of schizophrenia, and have also been implicated in sleep and circadian function. In the present study, we characterised the sleep and circadian rhythms of Grm2/3 double knockout (Grm2/3^-/-) mice, to provide further evidence for the involvement of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in the regulation of sleep and circadian rhythms. We report several novel findings. Firstly, Grm2/3^-/- mice demonstrated a decrease in immobility-determined sleep time and an increase in immobility-determined sleep fragmentation. Secondly, Grm2/3^-/- mice showed heightened sensitivity to the circadian effects of light, manifested as increased period lengthening in constant light, and greater phase delays in response to nocturnal light pulses. Greater light-induced phase delays were also exhibited by wildtype C57Bl/6J mice following administration of the mGlu2/3 negative allosteric modulator RO4432717. These results confirm the involvement of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors in photic entrainment and sleep regulation pathways. Finally, the diurnal wheel-running rhythms of Grm2/3^-/- mice were perturbed under a standard light/dark cycle, but their diurnal rest-activity rhythms were unaltered in cages lacking running wheels, as determined with passive infrared motion detectors. Hence, when assessing the diurnal rest-activity rhythms of mice, the choice of assay can have a major bearing on the results obtained.